Southern California Law Review, 81:3 (March 2008)

Southern California Law Review, 81:3 (March 2008)

Articles

Margaret H. Lemos, The Other Delegate: Judicially Administered Statutes and the Nondelegation Doctrine, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 405 (2008)

David Luban, On the Commander in Chief Power, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 477 (2008)

Notes

Padraic Foran, Unreasonably Wrong: The Supreme Court's Supremacy, the AEDPA Standard, and Carey v. Musladin, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 571 (2008)

Michael Moulton, Effecting the Impossible: An Argument Against Tax Strategy Patents, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 631 (2008)

Posted by Southern California Law Review at 01:44 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Southern California Law Review, 81:2 (January 2008)

Southern California Law Review, 81:2 (January 2008)

Articles

Robin J. Effron, Event Jurisdiction and Protective Coordination: Lessons from the September 11th Litigation, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 199 (2008)

Mark A. Geistfeld, Punitive Damages, Retribution, and Due Process, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 263 (2008)

Notes

Josh Cavinato, Turbulence in the Airline Industry: Rethinking America's Foreign Ownership Restrictions, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 311 (2008)

Joel M. Purles, Balancing the Scales: Expanding the Family Movie Act to Protect Consumers After Clean Flicks of Colorado, LLC v. Soderbergh, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 351 (2008)

Posted by Southern California Law Review at 01:47 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Southern California Law Review, 81:1 (November 2007)

Southern California Law Review, 81:1 (November 2007)

Articles

Paul H. Robinson & John M. Darley, Intuitions of Justice: Implications for Criminal Law and Justice Policy, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1 (2007)

Barak D. Richman & Christopher R. Murray, Rebuilding Illinois Brick: A Functionalist Approach to the Indirect Purchaser Rule, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 69 (2007)

Notes

Kenneth Kronstadt, Looking Behind the Curtain: Applying Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act to Businesses Behind Commercial Websites, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 111 (2007)

Gabriel Morgan, No More Playing Favorites: Reconsidering the Conclusive Congressional Presumption that Intercollegiate Athletics are Substantially Related to Educational Purposes, 81 S. Cal. L. Rev. 149 (2007)

Posted by Southern California Law Review at 11:00 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Announcing Postscript, the Online Companion to the Southern California Law Review

The Southern California Law Review is pleased to announce the launch of its new online companion, Postscript. Other top law schools have added online companions, and the Law Review finds these new mediums to be a developing and important component of legal scholarship. Postscript permits us to publish a wider variety of material than we can accommodate in our printed journal. Postscript is intended to enhance legal scholarship by providing a forum where academics, practitioners, and students can respond to articles published in the Law Review and to recent legal developments in a concise and expedited format.

Postscript invites two categories of submissions. First, Postscript publishes responses to articles published in the Law Review. Second, Postscript publishes commentaries on legal developments and significant court decisions. We issue topic prompts for commentaries. In addition, authors are free to submit commentaries on other topics.

Postscript utilizes a more expedited production process than the Law Review. Thus, we encourage responses and commentaries under 3,000 words and lightly footnoted. Academics, judges, practitioners, and students are free to submit pieces of original scholarship to Postscript.

For more information, please visit our website. For comments or suggestions, please e-mail postscript@law.usc.edu. We invite and look forward to your participation in Postscript.

Posted by Southern California Law Review at 01:48 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Southern California Law Review, 80:6 (September 2007)

Southern California Law Review, 80:6 (September 2007)

Articles

Paul Berman, Global Legal Pluralism, 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1155 (2007)

Stavros Gadinis & Howell E. Jackson, Markets as Regulators: A Survey, 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1239 (2007)

Notes

Kyle Alexander Casazza, Inkblots: How the Ninth Amendment and the Privileges or Immunities Clause Protect Unenumerated Constitutional Rights, 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1383 (2007)

Richard C. Herrera, Policing State Testing Under No Child Left Behind: Encouraging Students with Disabilities to Blow the Whistle on Unscrupulous Educators, 80 S. Cal. L. Rev. 1433 (2007)

Posted by Southern California Law Review at 12:38 AM | Comments (1) | TrackBack

Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project

I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.

The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!

Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.

Participating law reviews thus far include:
* Boston College
* Chicago
* Columbia
* Cornell
* Duke
* Emory
* Fordham
* Georgetown
* GW
* Harvard
* Indiana
* Michigan
* Minnesota
* NYU
* Northwestern
* Notre Dame
* Southern California
* Stanford
* Texas
* UCLA
* Vanderbilt
* Virginia
* Washington University
* Yale

We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.

We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.

Posted by Daniel J. Solove at 12:10 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack