Minnesota Law Review, 92:3 (February 2008)

Minnesota Law Review, Issue 92:3 (February 2008)

Articles

Laurie L. Levenson, Courtroom Demeanor: The Theater of the Courtroom, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 573 (2008)

Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir, More Is not Always Better than Less: An Exploration in Property Law, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 634 (2008)

J. Gregory Sidak, Holdup, Royalty Stacking, and the Presumption of Injunctive Relief for Patent Infringement: A Reply to Lemley and Shapiro, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 714 (2008)

Exchange

Oren Bar-Gill, The Behavioral Economics of Consumer Contracts, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 749 (2008)

Richard A. Epstein, The Neoclassical Economics of Consumer Contracts, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 803 (2008)

Notes

Karen P. Seifert, Interpreting the Law of War: Rewriting the Rules of Engagement to Police Iraq, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 836 (2008)

Bryan M. Seiler, Moving from "Broken Windows" to Healthy Neighborhood Policy: Reforming Urban Nuisance Law in Public and Private Sectors, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 883 (2008)

Posted by Minnesota Law Review at 11:41 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Minnesota Law Review, 92:2 (December 2007)

Minnesota Law Review, Issue 92:2 (December 2007)


Articles

Todd E. Pettys, State Habeas Relief for Federal Extrajudicial Detainees, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 265 (2007)

Lawrence A. Cunningham, Beyond Liability: Rewarding Effective Gatekeepers, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 323 (2007)

Jonathan R. Siegel, Judicial Interpretation in the Cost-Benefit Crucible, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 387 (2007)

Michael Waterstone, A New Vision of Public Enforcement, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 434 (2007)

Notes

Elizabeth M. Flanagan, No Free Parking: Obtaining Relief from Trademark-Infringing Domain Name Parking, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 498 (2007)

João C. J. G. de Medeiros, How the Presumption Against Extraterritoriality Has Created a Gap in Environmental Protection at the 49th Parallel, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 529 (2007)

---

Posted by Minnesota Law Review at 06:39 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Minnesota Law Review, 92:1 (November 2007)

Minnesota Law Review, Issue 92:1 (November 2007)

See below for abstracts.

Articles

Jason Mazzone, The Bill of Rights in the Early State Courts, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 1 (2007)

Alexandra B. Klass, Punitive Damages and Valuing Harm, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 83 (2007)

Susan D. Franck, Integrating Investment Treaty Conflict and Dispute Systems Design, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 161 (2007)

Note

Carrie Ryan Gallia, To Fix or Not to Fix: Copyright's Fixation Requirement and the Rights of Theatrical Collaborators, 92 Minn. L. Rev. 231 (2007)

---

Posted by Minnesota Law Review at 02:46 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack

Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project

I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.

The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!

Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.

Participating law reviews thus far include:
* Boston College
* Chicago
* Columbia
* Cornell
* Duke
* Emory
* Fordham
* Georgetown
* GW
* Harvard
* Indiana
* Michigan
* Minnesota
* NYU
* Northwestern
* Notre Dame
* Southern California
* Stanford
* Texas
* UCLA
* Vanderbilt
* Virginia
* Washington University
* Yale

We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.

We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.

Posted by Daniel J. Solove at 12:10 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack