May 10, 2008
Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 4 (May 2008)
Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 4 (May 2008)
Articles
Grand Jury Discretion and Constitutional Design
Roger A. Fairfax, Jr.
Can Law Manage Competitive Energy Markets?
David B. Spence
Notes
Striking a Better Public-Private Balance in Forum Non Conveniens
Emily J. Derr
Restitution and the Lacey Act: New Solutions, Old Remedies
Kenneth B. Meyer
Book Review
The Quantitative Moment and the Qualitative Opportunity: Legal Studies of Judicial Decision Making
Gregory C. Sisk
Posted by Cornell Law Review at 12:33 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
March 31, 2008
Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 3 (March 2008)
Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 3 (March 2008)
Articles and Responses
State Courts Unbound
Frederic M. Bloom
Trust Privacy
Frances H. Foster
Notes
Torturous Consequences and the Case of Maher Arar: Can Canadian Solutions "Cure" the Due Process Deficiencies in U.S. Removal Proceedings?
Erin Craddock
The Mangnuson-Moss Warranty Act, the Federal Arbitration Act, and the Future of Consumer Protection
Jonathan D. Grossberg
Book Review
Against Judgment
Katherine Y. Barnes
Posted by Cornell Law Review at 04:03 PM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
December 18, 2007
Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 1 (November 2007)
Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 1 (November 2007)
Articles and Responses
Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases
Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski & Andrew J. Wistrich
Unleashing the Dogs of War: What the Constitution Means by “Declare War”
Saikrishna Prakash
Making War
Robert J. Delahunty & John Yoo
The President’s Power to Respond to Attacks
Michael D. Ramsey
A Two-Front War
Saikrishna Prakash
Notes
“Respectful Consideration” After Sanchez-Llamas V. Oregon: Why the Supreme Court Owes More to the International Court of Justice
Steven Arrigg Koh
Posted by Cornell Law Review at 11:30 AM | Comments (0) | TrackBack
November 13, 2007
Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project
I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.
The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!
Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.
Participating law reviews thus far include:
* Boston College
* Chicago
* Columbia
* Cornell
* Duke
* Emory
* Fordham
* Georgetown
* GW
* Harvard
* Indiana
* Michigan
* Minnesota
* NYU
* Northwestern
* Notre Dame
* Southern California
* Stanford
* Texas
* UCLA
* Vanderbilt
* Virginia
* Washington University
* Yale
We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.
We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.
Posted by Daniel J. Solove at 12:10 AM | Comments (7) | TrackBack
