<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Law Rev (Wm &amp; Mary)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/category/law-rev-wm-mary/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>William and Mary Law Review, Issue 51:6 (May 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-516-may-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-516-may-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 17:41:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=27665</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"></p>
<p style="text-align: center">Articles</p>
<p>Robin J. Effron, The Plaintiff Neutrality Principle: Pleading Complex Litigation in the Era of Twombly and Iqbal</p>
<p>Grant Hayden &#38; Matthew T. Bodie, Shareholder Democracy and the Curious Turn Toward Board Primacy</p>
<p>Michael M. O&#8217;Hear, Appellate Review of Sentences: Reconsidering Deference</p>
<p>David S. Rubenstein, &#8220;Relative Checks&#8221;: Towards Optimal Control of Administrative Power</p>
<p style="text-align: center">Notes</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<p align="left">Colin P. McCarthy,  Paging Dr. Google: Personal Health Records and Patient Privacy
 </p>
<p> </p>
<p align="left">Andrew M. Szlagyi, Blowing Its Cover: How the Intelligence Identities Protection Act Has Masqueraded as an Effective Law and Why It Must Be Amended</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" alt="WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Robin J. Effron, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Effron_final.pdf">The Plaintiff Neutrality Principle: Pleading Complex Litigation in the Era of <i>Twombly</i> and <i>Iqbal</i></a></p>
<p>Grant Hayden &amp; Matthew T. Bodie, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Hayden-Bodie_final.pdf">Shareholder Democracy and the Curious Turn Toward Board Primacy</a></p>
<p>Michael M. O&#8217;Hear, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/O'Hear_final.pdf">Appellate Review of Sentences: Reconsidering Deference</a></p>
<p>David S. Rubenstein, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Rubenstein_final.pdf">&#8220;Relative Checks&#8221;: Towards Optimal Control of Administrative Power</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>
<p align="left"><span style="font-weight: normal">Colin P. McCarthy, </span><em><a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/McCarthyNote_final.pdf"><span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal"> Paging Dr. Google: Personal Health Records and Patient Privacy<br />
 </span></span></a></em></p>
<p> </strong></p>
<p align="left"><span style="font-weight: normal">Andrew M. Szlagyi, </span><em><a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/SzilagyiNote_final.pdf"><span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal">Blowing Its Cover: How the Intelligence Identities Protection Act Has Masqueraded as an Effective Law and Why It Must Be Amended</span></span></a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-516-may-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William and Mary Law Review, Issue 51:5 (April 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-515-april-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-515-april-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Apr 2010 15:01:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=27006</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"></p>
<p style="text-align: center">Articles</p>
<p>David S. Law &#38; David Zaring, Law Versus Ideology: The Supreme Court and the Use of Legislative History</p>
<p>Jessica Erickson, Corporate Governance in the Courtroom: An Empirical Analysis</p>
<p>Michael B. Kent, Jr., Theoretical Tension and Doctrinal Discord: Analyzing Development Impact Fees as Takings</p>
<p>W. Mark C. Weidemaier, Toward a Theory of Precedent in Arbitration</p>
<p style="text-align: center">Notes</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<p align="left">Jessica R. Coulter, A Sea Change To Change the Sea: Stopping the Spread of the Pacific Garbage Patch with Small-Scale Environmental Legislation</p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" alt="WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>David S. Law &amp; David Zaring, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Law_Zaring_final.pdf">Law Versus Ideology: The Supreme Court and the Use of Legislative History</a></p>
<p>Jessica Erickson, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Erickson_final.pdf">Corporate Governance in the Courtroom: An Empirical Analysis</a></p>
<p>Michael B. Kent, Jr., <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Kent_final.pdf">Theoretical Tension and Doctrinal Discord: Analyzing Development Impact Fees as Takings</a></p>
<p>W. Mark C. Weidemaier, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Weidemaier_final.pdf">Toward a Theory of Precedent in Arbitration</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>
<p align="left"><span style="font-weight: normal">Jessica R. Coulter, </span><em><a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/CoulterNote_final.pdf"><span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal">A Sea Change To Change the Sea: Stopping the Spread of the Pacific Garbage Patch with Small-Scale Environmental Legislation</span></span></a></em></p>
<p> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-515-april-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William and Mary Law Review, Issue 51:4 (March 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-514-march-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-514-march-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Apr 2010 15:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"></p>
<p style="text-align: center">Articles</p>
<p>Fabio Arcila, The Death of Suspicion</p>
<p>Derek Black, Unlocking the Power of State Constitutions with Equal Protection: The First Step Toward Education as a Federally Protected Right</p>
<p>Robert J. Rhee, Bonding Limited Liability</p>
<p>Jeffrey W. Stempel, The Insurance Policy and Social Instrument and Social Institution</p>
<p style="text-align: center">Notes</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
<p align="left">Krysta R. Edwards, The Vote from Beyond the Grave</p>
<p align="left">Noah A. Kuschel, Exempting Police from 18 U.S.C. 924(c)</p>
<p> </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" alt="WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Fabio Arcila, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/arcila.pdf">The Death of Suspicion</a></p>
<p>Derek Black, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/black.pdf">Unlocking the Power of State Constitutions with Equal Protection: The First Step Toward Education as a Federally Protected Right</a></p>
<p>Robert J. Rhee, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/rhee.pdf">Bonding Limited Liability</a></p>
<p>Jeffrey W. Stempel, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/stempel.pdf">The Insurance Policy and Social Instrument and Social Institution</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>
<p align="left"><span style="font-weight: normal">Krysta R. Edwards, </span><em><a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/edwards.pdf"><span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal">The Vote from Beyond the Grave</span></span></a></em></p>
<p align="left"><span style="font-weight: normal">Noah A. Kuschel, </span><em><a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/kuschel.pdf"><span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal">Exempting Police from 18 U.S.C. 924(c)</span></span></a></em></p>
<p> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-514-march-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William and Mary Law Review, Issue 51:3 (December 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-513-december-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-513-december-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 22:29:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=23987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"></p>
<p style="text-align: center">Articles</p>
<p>Alan Devlin &#38; Neel Sukhatme, Self-Realizing Inventions and the Utilitarian Foundation of Patent Law</p>
<p>David Glazier, Playing by the Rules: Combating al Qaeda Within the Law of War</p>
<p>Anita S. Krishnakumar, The Hidden Legacy of Holy Trinity Church: The Unique National Institution Canon</p>
<p>Mark Moller, A New Look at the Original Meaning of the Diversity Clause</p>
<p style="text-align: center">Notes</p>
<p style="text-align: center"></p>
<p align="left">Andrew T. Erwin, Avoiding Another Eldorado: Balancing Parental Liberty and the Risk of Error with Governmental Interest in the Well-Being of Children in Complex Cases of Child Removal</p>
<p align="left">Christopher G. Wilson, Embedded Federal Questions, Exclusive Jurisdiction, and Patent-Based Malpractice Claims</p>
<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" alt="WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Alan Devlin &amp; Neel Sukhatme, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/devlin_final.pdf">Self-Realizing Inventions and the Utilitarian Foundation of Patent Law</a></p>
<p>David Glazier, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/glazier_final.pdf">Playing by the Rules: Combating al Qaeda Within the Law of War</a></p>
<p>Anita S. Krishnakumar, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/krishnakumar_final.pdf">The Hidden Legacy of <i>Holy Trinity Church</i>: The Unique National Institution Canon</a></p>
<p>Mark Moller, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/moller_final.pdf">A New Look at the Original Meaning of the Diversity Clause</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong></p>
<p align="left"><span style="font-weight: normal">Andrew T. Erwin, </span><em><a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/erwinNote_final.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal">Avoiding Another Eldorado: Balancing Parental Liberty and the Risk of Error with Governmental Interest in the Well-Being of Children in Complex Cases of Child Removal</span></span></a></em></p>
<p align="left"><span style="font-weight: normal">Christopher G. Wilson, </span><em><a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/wilsonNote_final.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal">Embedded Federal Questions, Exclusive Jurisdiction, and Patent-Based Malpractice Claims</span></span></a></em></p>
<p></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-513-december-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William and Mary Law Review, Issue 51:2 (November 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-512-november-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-512-november-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Dec 2009 04:03:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"></p>
<p style="text-align: center">Boundaries of Intellectual Property Symposium</p>
<p>Trotter Hardy, Introduction</p>
<p>Dan L. Burk and Brett H. McDonnell, Trademarks and the Boundaries of the Firm</p>
<p>Jason Mazzone, Administering Fair Use</p>
<p>Pamela Samuelson and Tara Wheatland, Statutory Damages in Copyright Law: A Remedy in Need of Reform</p>
<p>Rebecca Tushnet, Economies of Desire: Fair Use and Marketplace Assumptions</p>
<p>Jane Winn and Nicolas Jondet, A New Deal for End Users? Lessons from a French Innovation in the Regulation of Interoperability</p>
<p>Margo A. Bagley, The New Invention Creation Activity Boundary in Patent Law</p>
<p>John F. Duffy, Rules and Standards on the Forefront of Patentability</p>
<p>Mark A. Lemley, Distinguishing Lost Profits from Reasonable Royalties</p>
<p>Michael J. Meurer, Patent Examination Priorities</p>
<p>Graeme B. Dimwoodie, Developing a Private International Intellectual Property Law: The Demise of Territoriality?</p>
<p>Brett Frischmann, Spillovers Theory and its Conceptual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" alt="WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Boundaries of Intellectual Property Symposium</strong></p>
<p>Trotter Hardy, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/HardyIntro_final.pdf">Introduction</a></p>
<p>Dan L. Burk and Brett H. McDonnell, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Burk-McDonnell_final.pdf">Trademarks and the Boundaries of the Firm</a></p>
<p>Jason Mazzone, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Mazzone_final.pdf">Administering Fair Use</a></p>
<p>Pamela Samuelson and Tara Wheatland, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Samuelson-Wheatland_final.pdf">Statutory Damages in Copyright Law: A Remedy in Need of Reform</a></p>
<p>Rebecca Tushnet, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Tushnet_final.pdf">Economies of Desire: Fair Use and Marketplace Assumptions</a></p>
<p>Jane Winn and Nicolas Jondet, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Winn-Jondet_final.pdf">A New Deal for End Users? Lessons from a French Innovation in the Regulation of Interoperability</a></p>
<p>Margo A. Bagley, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Bagley_final.pdf">The New Invention Creation Activity Boundary in Patent Law</a></p>
<p>John F. Duffy, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Duffy_final.pdf">Rules and Standards on the Forefront of Patentability</a></p>
<p>Mark A. Lemley, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Lemley_final.pdf">Distinguishing Lost Profits from Reasonable Royalties</a></p>
<p>Michael J. Meurer, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Meurer_final.pdf">Patent Examination Priorities</a></p>
<p>Graeme B. Dimwoodie, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Dinwoodie_final.pdf">Developing a Private International Intellectual Property Law: The Demise of Territoriality?</a></p>
<p>Brett Frischmann, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Frischmann_final.pdf">Spillovers Theory and its Conceptual Boundaries</a></p>
<p>Laura A. Heymann, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Heymann_final.pdf">How to Write a Life: Some Thoughts on Fixaiton and the Copyright/Privacy Divide</a></p>
<p>Mark P. McKenna, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/McKenna_final.pdf">An Alternate Approach to Channeling?</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Online Response</strong></p>
<p>Steven Hetcher, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/HetcherOnline_final_2.pdf">A Response to Rebecca Tushnet&#8217;s <i>Economies of Desire</i></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/william-and-mary-law-review-issue-512-november-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William &amp; Mary Law Review, Issue 51:1 (October 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/william-mary-law-review-issue-511-october-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/william-mary-law-review-issue-511-october-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Oct 2009 13:34:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21622</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"></p>
<p style="text-align: center">Articles</p>
<p>Adam M. Samaha, Randomization in Adjudication</p>
<p>Elizabeth T. Lear, Federalism, Forum Shopping, and the Foreign Injury Paradox</p>
<p>Wayne A. Logan, Contingent Constitutionalism: State and Local Laws and the Applicability of Federal Constitutional Rights</p>
<p>Scott A. Moss and Peter H. Huang, How the New Economics Can Improve Employment Discrimination Law, and How Economics Can Survive the Demise of the Rational Actor</p>
<p style="text-align: center">Notes</p>
<p style="text-align: center"></p>
<p align="left">Anna C. Leist, Voting With Their Feet and Dollars: The Role of Investors and the Influence of the Mutual Fund Market in Regulating Fees</p>
<p align="left">Scott J. Upright, Suspicionless Border Seizures of Electronic Files: The Overextension of the Border Search Exception to the Fourth Amendment</p>
<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" alt="WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Adam M. Samaha, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Samaha_final.pdf">Randomization in Adjudication</a></p>
<p>Elizabeth T. Lear, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Lear_final.pdf">Federalism, Forum Shopping, and the Foreign Injury Paradox</a></p>
<p>Wayne A. Logan, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Logan_final.pdf">Contingent Constitutionalism: State and Local Laws and the Applicability of Federal Constitutional Rights</a></p>
<p>Scott A. Moss and Peter H. Huang, <a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/Moss_final.pdf">How the New Economics Can Improve Employment Discrimination Law, and How Economics Can Survive the Demise of the Rational Actor</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong></p>
<p align="left"><span style="font-weight: normal">Anna C. Leist, </span><em><a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/LeistNote_final.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal">Voting With Their Feet and Dollars: The Role of Investors and the Influence of the Mutual Fund Market in Regulating Fees</span></span></a></em></p>
<p align="left"><span style="font-weight: normal">Scott J. Upright, </span><em><a href="http://wmlawreview.org/files/UprightNote_final.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal"><span style="font-style: normal">Suspicionless Border Seizures of Electronic Files: The Overextension of the Border Search Exception to the Fourth Amendment</span></span></a></em></p>
<p></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/william-mary-law-review-issue-511-october-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William &amp; Mary Law Review, Issue 50:6 (May 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/william-mary-law-review-issue-506-may-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/william-mary-law-review-issue-506-may-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 03:24:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16540</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Articles</p>
<p>Andrew Koppelman, Corruption of Religion and the Establishment Clause</p>
<p>Thomas A. Lambert, Dr. Miles is Dead. Now What?: Structuring a Rule of Reason for Evaluating Minimum Resale Price Maintenance</p>
<p>Robert T. Miller, The Economics of Deal Risk: Allocating Risk Through MAC Clauses in Business Combination Agreements</p>
<p>Matthew J. Tokson, The Content/Envelope Distinction in Internet Law</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Notes</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p align="left">Aaron C. Garrett, New Theories of Guilt on Appeal in Virginia Criminal Cases</p>
<p align="left">David W. Tyler, Clarifying Departmentalism: How the Framers&#8217; Vision of Judicial and Presidential Review Makes the Case for Deductive Judicial Supremacy</p>
<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" alt="WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Andrew Koppelman, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Koppelman_final.pdf">Corruption of Religion and the Establishment Clause</a></p>
<p>Thomas A. Lambert, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Lambert_final.pdf"><em>Dr. Miles</em> is Dead. Now What?: Structuring a Rule of Reason for Evaluating Minimum Resale Price Maintenance</a></p>
<p>Robert T. Miller, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Miller_final.pdf">The Economics of Deal Risk: Allocating Risk Through MAC Clauses in Business Combination Agreements</a></p>
<p>Matthew J. Tokson, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Tokson_final.pdf">The Content/Envelope Distinction in Internet Law</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong></p>
<p align="left"><span style="font-weight: normal;">Aaron C. Garrett, </span><em><a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/GarrettNote_final.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-style: normal;">New Theories of Guilt on Appeal in Virginia Criminal Cases</span></span></a></em></p>
<p align="left"><span style="font-weight: normal;">David W. Tyler, </span><em><a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/TylerNote_final.pdf" target="_blank"><span style="font-weight: normal;"><span style="font-style: normal;">Clarifying Departmentalism: How the Framers&#8217; Vision of Judicial and Presidential Review Makes the Case for Deductive Judicial Supremacy</span></span></a></em></p>
<p></strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/william-mary-law-review-issue-506-may-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William &amp; Mary Law Review, Issue 50:5 (April 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/william-mary-law-review-volume-505-april-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/william-mary-law-review-volume-505-april-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 May 2009 23:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16357</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Articles</p>
<p>Alexandra B. Klass, Tort Experiments in the Laboratories of Democracy</p>
<p>Minna J. Kotkin, Diversity and Discrimination: A Look at Complex Bias</p>
<p>Kurt T. Lash, Leaving the Chisholm Trail: The Eleventh Amendment and the Background Principle of Strict Construction</p>
<p>David L. Schwartz, Courting Specialization: An Empirical Study of Claim Construction Comparing Patent Litigation Before Federal District Courts and the International Trade Commission</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Notes</p>
<p>Arpan A. Sura, An End-Run Around the Takings Clause? The Law and Economics of Bivens Actions for Property Rights Abuse</p>
<p>Angela J. Tang, Taking Aim at Tiahrt</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" alt="WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Alexandra B. Klass, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Klass_final.pdf">Tort Experiments in the Laboratories of Democracy</a></p>
<p>Minna J. Kotkin, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Kotkin_final.pdf">Diversity and Discrimination: A Look at Complex Bias</a></p>
<p>Kurt T. Lash, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Lash_final_002.pdf">Leaving the <em>Chisholm</em> Trail: The Eleventh Amendment and the Background Principle of Strict Construction</a></p>
<p>David L. Schwartz, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Schwartz_final.pdf">Courting Specialization: An Empirical Study of Claim Construction Comparing Patent Litigation Before Federal District Courts and the International Trade Commission</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Arpan A. Sura, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Sura_final.pdf">An End-Run Around the Takings Clause? The Law and Economics of <em>Bivens</em> Actions for Property Rights Abuse</a></p>
<p>Angela J. Tang, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Tang_final.pdf">Taking Aim at Tiahrt</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/william-mary-law-review-volume-505-april-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William &amp; Mary Law Review, Issue 50:4 (March 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/william_mary_la_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/william_mary_la_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 18:52:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/04/william-mary-law-review-issue-504-march-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Symposium: The Citizen Lawyer</p>
<p>Paul D. Carrington &#038; Roger C. Cramton, Original Sin and Judicial Independence: Providing Accountability for Justices</p>
<p>Lawrence M. Friedman, Some Thoughts about Citizen Lawyers</p>
<p>Robert W. Gordon, The Citizen Lawyer&#8211;A Brief History of a Myth with Some Basis in Reality</p>
<p>Bruce A. Green &#038; Russell G. Pearce, &#8220;Public Service Must Begin at Home&#8221;: The Lawyer as Civics Teacher in Everyday Practice</p>
<p>Sanford Levinson, What Should Citizens (As Participants in a Republican Form of Government) Know About the Constitution?</p>
<p>James E. Moliterno, A Golden Age of Civic Involvement: The Client Centered Disadvantage for Lawyers Acting as Public Officials</p>
<p>W. Taylor Reveley III, The Citizen Lawyer</p>
<p>Deborah L. Rhode, Lawyers as Citizens</p>
<p>Edward Rubin, The Citizen Lawyer and the Administrative State</p>
<p>Mark Tushnet, Citizen as Lawyer, Lawyer as Citizen</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Troy L. Gwartney, Harmonizing the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img alt="WM-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></center></p>
<p><center><strong>Symposium: The Citizen Lawyer</strong></center></p>
<p>Paul D. Carrington &#038; Roger C. Cramton, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Carrington_Final.pdf">Original Sin and Judicial Independence: Providing Accountability for Justices</a></p>
<p>Lawrence M. Friedman, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Friedman_Final.pdf">Some Thoughts about Citizen Lawyers</a></p>
<p>Robert W. Gordon, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Gordon_Final.pdf">The Citizen Lawyer&#8211;A Brief History of a Myth with Some Basis in Reality</a></p>
<p>Bruce A. Green &#038; Russell G. Pearce, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Green_Final.pdf">&#8220;Public Service Must Begin at Home&#8221;: The Lawyer as Civics Teacher in Everyday Practice</a></p>
<p>Sanford Levinson, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Levinson_Final.pdf">What Should Citizens (As Participants in a Republican Form of Government) Know About the Constitution?</a></p>
<p>James E. Moliterno, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Moliterno_Final.pdf">A Golden Age of Civic Involvement: The Client Centered Disadvantage for Lawyers Acting as Public Officials</a></p>
<p>W. Taylor Reveley III, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Reveley_Final.pdf">The Citizen Lawyer</a></p>
<p>Deborah L. Rhode, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Rhode_Final.pdf">Lawyers as Citizens</a></p>
<p>Edward Rubin, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Rubin_Final.pdf">The Citizen Lawyer and the Administrative State</a></p>
<p>Mark Tushnet, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Tushnet_Final.pdf">Citizen as Lawyer, Lawyer as Citizen</a></p>
<p><center><strong>Notes</strong></center></p>
<p>Troy L. Gwartney, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/GwartneyNote_Final.pdf">Harmonizing the Exclusionary Rights of Patents with Compulsory Licensing</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/william_mary_la_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William &amp; Mary Law Review, Issue 50:3 (Jan. 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/william_mary_la_4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/william_mary_la_4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 18:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/01/william-mary-law-review-issue-503-jan-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Daralyn J. Durie &#038; Mark A. Lemley, A Realistic Approach to the Obviousness of Inventions</p>
<p></p>
<p>Aaron Xavier Fellmeth, State Regulation of Sexuality in International Human Rights Law and Theory</p>
<p></p>
<p>Clayton P. Gillette, Can Public Debt Enhance Democracy?</p>
<p></p>
<p>Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash, Imperial and Imperiled: The Curious State of the Executive</p>
<p></p>
<p>Joseph A. Seiner, The Failure of Punitive Damages in Employment Discrimination Cases: A Call for Change</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Emily Jane Dodds, I&#8217;ll Make You a Deal: How Repeat Informants Are Corrupting the Criminal Justice System and What To Do About It</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img alt="WM-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></center></p>
<p><center><strong>Articles</strong></center></p>
<p>Daralyn J. Durie &#038; Mark A. Lemley, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/LemleyDurie_Final.pdf">A Realistic Approach to the Obviousness of Inventions</p>
<p></a></p>
<p>Aaron Xavier Fellmeth, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Fellmeth_final.pdf">State Regulation of Sexuality in International Human Rights Law and Theory</p>
<p></a></p>
<p>Clayton P. Gillette, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Gillette_Final.pdf">Can Public Debt Enhance Democracy?</p>
<p></a></p>
<p>Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Prakash_Final.pdf">Imperial and Imperiled: The Curious State of the Executive</p>
<p></a></p>
<p>Joseph A. Seiner, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Seiner_Final.pdf">The Failure of Punitive Damages in Employment Discrimination Cases: A Call for Change</a></p>
<p><center><strong>Notes</strong></center></p>
<p>Emily Jane Dodds, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Dodds_Final.pdf">I&#8217;ll Make You a Deal: How Repeat Informants Are Corrupting the Criminal Justice System and What To Do About It</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/william_mary_la_4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William &amp; Mary Law Review, Issue 50:2 (Nov. 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/william_mary_la_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/william_mary_la_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 21:53:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/william-mary-law-review-issue-502-nov-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Steve P. Calandrillo &#038; Ewa M. Davison, The Dangers of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act: Much Ado About Nothing?</p>
<p></p>
<p>Brannon P. Denning, Reconstructing the Dormant Commerce Clause Doctrine</p>
<p></p>
<p>Gregory C. Sisk, The Continuing Drift of Federal Sovereign Immunity Jurisprudence</p>
<p></p>
<p>Andrew J. Wistrich, Procrastination, Deadlines, and Statutes of Limitation</p>
<p></p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Jennifer Gwynne Case, How Wide Should the Actual Innocence Gateway Be? An Attempt to Clarify the Miscarriage of Justice Exception for Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings</p>
<p></p>
<p>Heather Leigh Stangle, Murderous Madonna: Femininity, Violence, and The Myth of Postpartum Mental Disorder in Cases of Maternal Infanticide and Filicide</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img alt="WM-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></center></p>
<p><center><strong>Articles</strong></center></p>
<p>Steve P. Calandrillo &#038; Ewa M. Davison, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Calandrillo-10-BP.pdf">The Dangers of the Digital Millenium Copyright Act: Much Ado About Nothing?</p>
<p></a></p>
<p>Brannon P. Denning, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Denning-10-BP.pdf">Reconstructing the Dormant Commerce Clause Doctrine</p>
<p></a></p>
<p>Gregory C. Sisk, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Sisk-10-BP.pdf">The Continuing Drift of Federal Sovereign Immunity Jurisprudence</p>
<p></a></p>
<p>Andrew J. Wistrich, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Wistrich-10-BP.pdf">Procrastination, Deadlines, and Statutes of Limitation</p>
<p></a></p>
<p><center><strong>Notes</strong></center></p>
<p>Jennifer Gwynne Case, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/CaseNote-10-BP.pdf">How Wide Should the Actual Innocence Gateway Be? An Attempt to Clarify the Miscarriage of Justice Exception for Federal Habeas Corpus Proceedings</p>
<p></a></p>
<p>Heather Leigh Stangle, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/StangleNote-10-BP.pdf">Murderous Madonna: Femininity, Violence, and The Myth of Postpartum Mental Disorder in Cases of Maternal Infanticide and Filicide</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/william_mary_la_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William &amp; Mary Law Review, Issue 50:1 (Oct. 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/william_mary_la_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/william_mary_la_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 19:35:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/william-mary-law-review-issue-501-oct-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Larry Alexander &#038; Saikrishna B. Prakash, Tempest in an Empty Teapot: Why the Constitution Does Not Regulate Gerrymandering</p>
<p>Colleen V. Chien, Patently Protectionist? An Empirical Analysis of Patent Cases at the International Trade Commission</p>
<p>Michael S. Knoll, The Taxation of Private Equity Carried Interests: Estimating the Revenue Effects of Taxing Profit Interests as Ordinary Income</p>
<p>Nancy Morawetz, Rethinking Drug Inadmissibility</p>
<p>Giovanna Shay &#038; Christopher Lasch, Initiating a New Constitutional Dialogue: The Increased Importance Under AEDPA of Seeking Certiorari from Judgments of State Courts </p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>David C. Holman, Death by a Thousand Cases: After Booker, Rita, and Gall, the Guidelines Still Violate the Sixth Amendment</p>
<p>Meghaan Cecilia McElroy, Possession is Nine Tenths of the Law: But Who Really Owns a Church&#8217;s Property in the Wake of a Religious Split Within a Hierarchical [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img alt="WM-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></center></p>
<p><center><strong>Articles</strong></center></p>
<p>Larry Alexander &#038; Saikrishna B. Prakash, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/AlexanderPrakash-10-BP.pdf">Tempest in an Empty Teapot: Why the Constitution Does Not Regulate Gerrymandering</a></p>
<p>Colleen V. Chien, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Chien-10-BP.pdf">Patently Protectionist? An Empirical Analysis of Patent Cases at the International Trade Commission</a></p>
<p>Michael S. Knoll, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Knoll-10-BP.pdf">The Taxation of Private Equity Carried Interests: Estimating the Revenue Effects of Taxing Profit Interests as Ordinary Income</a></p>
<p>Nancy Morawetz, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/Morawetz-10-BP.pdf">Rethinking Drug Inadmissibility</a></p>
<p>Giovanna Shay &#038; Christopher Lasch, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/ShayLasch-10-BP.pdf">Initiating a New Constitutional Dialogue: The Increased Importance Under AEDPA of Seeking Certiorari from Judgments of State Courts </a></p>
<p><center><strong>Notes</strong></center></p>
<p>David C. Holman, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/HolmanNote-10-BP.pdf">Death by a Thousand Cases: After <em>Booker</em>, <em>Rita</em>, and <em>Gall</em>, the Guidelines Still Violate the Sixth Amendment</a></p>
<p>Meghaan Cecilia McElroy, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/McElroyNote-10-BP.pdf">Possession is Nine Tenths of the Law: But Who Really Owns a Church&#8217;s Property in the Wake of a Religious Split Within a Hierarchical Church? </a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/william_mary_la_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>William &amp; Mary Law Review, Issue 49:6 (May 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/william_mary_la.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/william_mary_la.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Sep 2008 19:49:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>William & Mary Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Wm & Mary)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Forum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/09/william-mary-law-review-issue-496-may-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Owen D. Jones &#038; Sarah F. Brosnan, Law, Biology, and Property: A New Theory of the Endowment Effect</p>
<p>Stephen A. Saltzburg &#038; Daniel J. Capra, The Unrecognized Right of Criminal Defendants to Admit Their Own Pretrial Statements</p>
<p>Jim Hawkins, Renting the Good Life</p>
<p>Timothy J. Holbrook, Extraterritoriality in U.S. Patent Law</p>
<p>Wren Cross Controversy</p>
<p>Gerard V. Bradley, Religion at a Public University</p>
<p>Erwin Chemerinsky, Why Church and State Should Be Separate</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Jocelyn Kempema, Imitation is the Sincerest Form of &#8230; Infringement?: Guitar Tabs, Fair Use and the Internet</p>
<p>Bin Wang, All Bark and No Bite: A Modern Evidentiary Argument for the Retirement of the Age-Old Pennsylvania Rule</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><center><img alt="WM-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/WM-logo.jpg" width="550" height="150" /></center></p>
<p><center><strong>Articles</strong></center></p>
<p>Owen D. Jones &#038; Sarah F. Brosnan, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/vol49-6_jones.pdf">Law, Biology, and Property: A New Theory of the Endowment Effect</a></p>
<p>Stephen A. Saltzburg &#038; Daniel J. Capra, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/vol49-6_capra.pdf">The Unrecognized Right of Criminal Defendants to Admit Their Own Pretrial Statements</a></p>
<p>Jim Hawkins, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/vol49-6_hawkins.pdf">Renting the Good Life</a></p>
<p>Timothy J. Holbrook, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/vol49-6_holbrook.pdf">Extraterritoriality in U.S. Patent Law</a></p>
<p><center><strong>Wren Cross Controversy</strong></center></p>
<p>Gerard V. Bradley, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/vol49-6_bradley.pdf">Religion at a Public University</a></p>
<p>Erwin Chemerinsky, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/vol49-6_chemerinsky.pdf">Why Church and State Should Be Separate</a></p>
<p><center><strong>Notes</strong></center></p>
<p>Jocelyn Kempema, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/vol49-6_kempema.pdf">Imitation is the Sincerest Form of &#8230; Infringement?: Guitar Tabs, Fair Use and the Internet</a></p>
<p>Bin Wang, <a href="http://web.wm.edu/law/publications/lawreview/documents/vol49-6_wang.pdf">All Bark and No Bite: A Modern Evidentiary Argument for the Retirement of the Age-Old Pennsylvania Rule</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/william_mary_la.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

