Site Meter

Category: Law Rev (Vanderbilt)

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 4 (May 2013)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 4 (May 2013).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is pleased to announce the publication of our May 2013 issue.
Congratulations to the class of 2013 and a special thank you to the outgoing editorial board for a great year!

 

ARTICLES

Sean J. Griffith & Alexandra D. Lahav, The Market for Preclusion in Merger Litigation, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1053 (2013).

Adam J. Kolber, Against Proportional Punishment, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1141 (2013).

D. Theodore Rave, Governing the Anticommons in Aggregate Litigation, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1183 (2013).

 

NOTES

Amy E. Sanders, A Gap in the Affordable Care Act: Will Tax Credits Be Available for Insurance Purchased Through Federal Exchanges?, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1259 (2013).

Andrew Tunnard, Not-So-Sweet Sixteen: When Minor Convictions Have Major Consequences Under Career Offender Guidelines, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1309 (2013).

 

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc – Roundtable: The JOBS Act and SEC Rulemaking

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to present our Spring 2013 Roundtable, which considers the SEC’s rulemaking authority under the JOBS Act of April 2012.

Practicing securities attorney Douglas Ellenoff, and Professors Usha Rodrigues and Andrew Schwartz each consider the public policy rationales of the JOBS Act, its legislative history, congressional intent, and practical considerations in order to offer some friendly advice to new Chairman Mary Jo White and the Commission.

Mr. Ellenoff and Prof. Schwartz focus on the rules required or allowed relating to crowdfunding under Title III of the Act, while Prof. Rodrigues examines the lifting of the ban on solicitation and advertising of securities offered to accredited investors under Title II. We hope you find this Roundtable informative and engaging.

Roundtable Essays

Making Crowdfunding CREDIBLE
Douglas S. Ellenoff · 66 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 19 (2013)

In Search of Safe Harbor: Suggestions for the New Rule 506(c)
Usha Rodrigues · 66 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 29 (2013)

Keep It Light, Chairman White: SEC Rulemaking Under the CROWDFUND Act
Andrew A. Schwartz · 66 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 43 (2013)

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 3 (April 2013)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 3 (April 2013).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is pleased to announce the publication of our April 2013 issue.

 

ARTICLES

Daniel Abebe & Aziz Z. Huq, Foreign Affairs Federalism: A Revisionist Approach, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 723 (2013).

Kent Barnett, Resolving the ALJ Quandary, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 797 (2013).

Anna di Robilant, Property: A Bundle of Sticks or a Tree?, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 869 (2013).

 

NOTES

Wesley C. Jackson, Life on Streets and Trails: Fourth Amendment Rights for the Homeless and Homeward Bound, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 933 (2013).

Benjamin J. McMichael, Constitutional Limitations on Punitive Damages: Ambiguous Effects and Inconsistent Justifications, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 961 (2013).

Emilie Winckel, Hardly a Black-and-White Matter: Analyzing the Validity and Protection of Single-Color Trademarks Within the Fashion Industry, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1015 (2013).

 

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 2 (March 2013)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 2 (March 2013).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is pleased to announce the publication of our March 2013 issue.

 

ARTICLES

Eric Biber, Cultivating a Green Political Landscape: Lessons for Climate Change Policy from the Defeat of California’s Proposition 23, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 399 (2013).

Kristin E. Hickman, Unpacking the Force of Law, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 465 (2013).

Michael S. Pardo, The Nature and Purpose of Evidence Theory, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 547 (2013).

 

NOTES

Matthew Chiarizio, An American Tragedy: E-Books, Licenses, and the End of Public Lending Libraries?, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 615 (2013).

Justin P. Gunter, Dual Standards for Third-Party Intervenors: Distinguishing Between Public-Law and Private-Law Intervention, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 645 (2013).

Eric Yeager, Looking For Trouble: An Exploration of How to Regulate Digital Searches, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 685 (2013).

 

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 1 (January 2013)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 1 (January 2013).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is proud to announce the publication of our January issue.

 

ARTICLES

Tun-Jen Chiang, The Reciprocity of Search, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1 (2013).

Michael D. Frakes & Melissa F. Wasserman, Does Agency Funding Affect Decisionmaking?: An Empirical Assessment of the PTO’s Granting Patterns, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 67 (2013).

Andrew Kent, Judicial Review for Enemy Fighters: The Court’s Fateful Turn in Ex parte Quirin, the Nazi Saboteur Case, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 153 (2013).

Joanna M. Shepherd, Products Liability and Economic Activity: An Empirical Analysis of Tort Reform’s Impact on Businesses, Employment, and Production, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 257 (2013).

 

NOTES

Taylor M. Owings, Identifying a Maverick: When Antitrust Law Should Protect a Low-Cost Competitor, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 323 (2013).

V. Blair Druhan, Severe or Pervasive: An Analysis of Who, What, and Where Matters When Determining Sexual Harassment, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 355 (2013).

 

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

1

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 65, Number 6 (November 2012): Supply and Demand: Barriers to a New Energy Future Symposium

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 65, Number 6 (November 2012).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is proud to announce the publication of our November issue, featuring articles from the Symposium held at Vanderbilt Law School on February 24, 2012, Supply and Demand: Barriers to a New Energy Future.

 

ARTICLES

Michael P. Vandenbergh, J.B. Ruhl & Jim Rossi, Symposium: Introduction, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1447 (2012).

Robert H. Socolow, Truths We Must Tell Ourselves to Manage Climate Change, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1455 (2012).

Daniel A. Farber, Sustainable Consumption, Energy Policy, and Individual Well-Being, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1479 (2012).

Michael P. Vandenbergh & Jim Rossi, Good for You, Bad for Us: The Financial Disincentive for Net Demand Reduction, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1527 (2012).

Katrina Fischer Kuh, Personal Environmental Information: The Promise and Perils of the Emerging Capacity to Identify Individual Environmental Harms, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1565 (2012).

Noah M. Sachs, Can We Regulate Our Way to Energy Efficiency? Product Standards as Climate Policy, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1631 (2012).

Uma Outka, Environmental Law and Fossil Fuels: Barriers to Renewable Energy, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1679 (2012).

Dan Tarlock, Hydro Law and the Future of Hydoelectric Power Generation in the United States, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1723 (2012).

J.B. Ruhl, Harmonizing Commercial Wind Power and the Endangered Species Act Through Administrative Reform, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1769 (2012).

Alexandra B. Klass & Elizabeth J. Wilson, Interstate Transmission Challenges for Renewable Energy: A Federalism Mismatch, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1801 (2012).

Sara C. Bronin, Building-Related Renewable Energy and the Case of 360 State Street, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1875 (2012).

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 65, Number 5 (October 2012)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 65, Number 5 (October 2012).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is proud to announce the publication of our October issue.

 

ARTICLES

Wayne A. Logan, Constitutional Cacophony: Federal Circuit Splits and the Fourth Amendment, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1137 (2012).

Terry A. Maroney, Angry Judges, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1207 (2012).

Morgan Ricks, A Regulatory Design for Monetary Stability, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1289 (2012).

 

NOTES

Angela L. Bergman, For Their Own Good? Exploring Legislative Responses to the Commercial Sexual Exploitation of Children and the Illinois Safe Children Act, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1361 (2012).

Marcy Nicks Moody, WARNING: MAY CAUSE WARMING Potential Trade Challenges to Private Environmental Labels, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1401 (2012).

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc – New Publications

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to announce several new publications.

Three response essays in our Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin Roundtable are now available, including:

Revisiting Grutter and Its Diversity Rationale: A Few Reactions to Professor Blumstein’s Critique
Vikram David Amar · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 195 (2012)

Whatever
Girardeau A. Spann · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 203 (2012)

The Education of an Admissions Office
Gerald Torres · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 211 (2012)

We have also published two new book reviews:

American Legal History Revisited
James W. Ely, Jr. · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 185 (2012), Reviewing: G. Edward White, Law in American History, Volume 1: From the Colonial Years Through the Civil War (Oxford University Press, 2012).

Justice for All?
Rebecca K. Lee · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 217 (2012), Reviewing: Judith Resnik & Dennis Curtis, Representing Justice: Invention, Controversy, and Rights in City-States and Democratic Courtrooms (Yale University Press, 2011).

0

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc Fisher v. University of Texas Roundtable

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to present the first round of our current Roundtable, which looks at Fisher v. University of Texas at Austin. Fisher will be argued in the October 2012 Supreme Court Term and the Court will consider whether the University of Texas’s use of race in its undergraduate admissions process is lawful under the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Professors Vikram Amar, James Blumstein, Tomiko Brown-Nagin, Girardeau Spann, and Gerald Torres consider the issues and offer their views on how the Court might—or should—approach this case in their “First Take” articles. In approximately eight weeks, these same scholars will offer responses to each other’s essays. We look forward to a spirited debate on these interesting and often contentious issues.

Roundtable: First Takes

Is Honesty the Best (Judicial) Policy in Affirmative Action Cases? Fisher v. University of Texas Gives the Court (Yet) Another Chance to Say Yes
Vikram David Amar · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 77 (2012)

Grutter and Fisher: A Reassessment and a Preview
James F. Blumstein · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 57 (2012)

The Diversity Paradox: Judicial Review in an Age of Demographic and Educational Change
Tomiko Brown-Nagin · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 113 (2012)

Fisher v. Grutter
Girardeau A. Spann · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 45 (2012)

Fisher v. University of Texas: Living in the Dwindling Shadow of LBJ’s America
Gerald Torres · 65 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 97 (2012)

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 65, Number 4 (May 2012)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 65, Number 4 (May 2012).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is proud to announce the publication of our May issue. Congratulations to the Class of 2012 and a special thank you to the outgoing editorial board!

 

ARTICLES

Sergio J. Campos, Mass Torts and Due Process, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1059 (2012).

David S. Rubenstein, Delegating Supremacy?, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1125 (2012).

Franita Tolson, Reinventing Sovereignty?: Federalism as a Constraint on the Voting Rights Act, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1195 (2012).

 

NOTES

Evie Whiting, Square Dance: Fitting the Square Peg of Fixation into the Round Hole of Choreographic Works, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1261 (2012).

John C. Williams, Qualifying Qualified Immunity, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1295 (2012).

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.