Archive for the ‘Law Rev (UCLA)’ Category
UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:2 (December, 2007)
posted by UCLA Law Review
UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:2 (December 2007).
Articles
Alejandro E. Camacho, Can Regulation Evolve? Lessons From a Study in Maladaptive Management, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 293 (2007).
Susan P. Crawford, The Internet and the Project of Communications Law, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 359 (2007).
Renée McDonald Hutchins, Tied Up in Knotts? GPS Technology and the Fourth Amendment, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 409 (2007).
Comments
Jordan Berman, Overworking the Presumption of Sanity: Clark’s Use of Mental Disease Evidence to Negate Mens Rea, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 467 (2007).
Ross Naughton, State Statutes Limiting the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine: Tools for Tribes to Reclaim Criminal Jurisdiction Stripped by Public Law 280?, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 489 (2007).
Kristen A. Williams, Employing Ex-Offenders: Shifting the Evaluation of Workplace Risks and Opportunities From Employers to Corrections, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 521 (2007).
January 15, 2008 at 2:16 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (UCLA), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
One Comment
UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:1 (October 2007)
posted by UCLA Law Review
UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:1 (October 2007).
Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture
William W. Fisher III, When Should We Permit Differential Pricing of Information?, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1 (2007).
Articles
Jill E. Fisch, Does Analyst Independence Sell Investors Short?, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 39 (2007).
Kenneth L. Karst, The Liberties of Equal Citizens: Groups and the Due Process Clause, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 99 (2007).
Peter S. Menell & David Nimmer, Legal Realism in Action: Indirect Copyright Liability’s Continuing Tort Framework and Sony’s De Facto Demise, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 143 (2007).
Comments
Richard J. Hawkins, Dysfunctional Equivalence: The New Approach to Defining “Postal Channels” Under the Hague Service Convention, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 205 (2007).
Vanessa A. Lavely, The Path to Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage: Reconciling the Inconsistencies Between Marriage and Adoption Cases, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 247 (2007).
November 21, 2007 at 9:51 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (UCLA), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments
Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project
posted by Daniel Solove
I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.
The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!
Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.
Participating law reviews thus far include:
* Boston College
* Chicago
* Columbia
* Cornell
* Duke
* Emory
* Fordham
* Georgetown
* GW
* Harvard
* Indiana
* Michigan
* Minnesota
* NYU
* Northwestern
* Notre Dame
* Southern California
* Stanford
* Texas
* UCLA
* Vanderbilt
* Virginia
* Washington University
* Yale
We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.
We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.
November 13, 2007 at 12:10 am
Posted in: Administrative Announcements, Law Rev (Boston College), Law Rev (Chicago), Law Rev (Columbia), Law Rev (Cornell), Law Rev (Duke), Law Rev (Emory), Law Rev (Fordham), Law Rev (Georgetown), Law Rev (GW), Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev (Indiana), Law Rev (Michigan), Law Rev (Minnesota), Law Rev (Northwestern), Law Rev (Notre Dame), Law Rev (NYU), Law Rev (S Cal), Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev (Texas), Law Rev (UCLA), Law Rev (Vanderbilt), Law Rev (Virginia), Law Rev (Yale), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
7 Comments
Announcing the Law Review Forum Project
posted by Daniel Solove
I am very pleased to announce a new project here at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Forum Project. We will be hosting online forums for several law reviews. Increasingly, law reviews are creating online forums as companions to their regular law review issues. These forums contain very short response pieces, essays, debates, and other works that attempt to bridge the gap between regular legal scholarship and the blogosphere.
Journals seeking to create their own online forum face two daunting challenges. First, they must create and actively maintain a web presence. Second, they must find ways to attract readers, which is difficult in an age where so many blogs and other websites exist. A wide readership for a website depends upon having daily content. Law review forums produce content sporadically throughout the year at intervals that are not regular enough to attract a significant readership.
Therefore, we have invited a number of law reviews to participate in a partnership with our blog. Throughout the year, each law review will periodically post forum essays here at Concurring Opinions. We are not requiring an exclusive license, so participating law reviews can also cross-post at their own websites.
We see this as a mutually-beneficial arrangement. We can bring great content to our blog, and law reviews can reach our significant audience without the pressures of having to build and maintain an online readership or of having to produce content with regularity.
Law reviews currently with and without existing forums will be participating. Thus far, the following law reviews have agreed to participate:
* Harvard Law Review
* Virginia Law Review
* Michigan Law Review
* University of Pennsylvania Law Review
* Northwestern Law Review
* UCLA Law Review
* George Washington Law Review
In the near future, we hope to be expanding the list of participating law reviews.
April 24, 2007 at 1:04 am
Posted in: Administrative Announcements, Law Rev (GW), Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev (Michigan), Law Rev (Northwestern), Law Rev (Penn), Law Rev (UCLA), Law Rev (Virginia), Law Rev Forum, Law School (Law Reviews), Law School (Scholarship)
Print This Post
4 Comments
