Concurring Opinions » Law Rev (UCLA)

UCLA Law Review 57:1 (October)

UCLA Law Review — Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:21:12 +0000

Volume 57, Issue 1 (October 2009)

Articles

From Privacy To Liberty: The Fourth Amendment After Lawrence	Thomas P. Crocker	1
Who Can Sue Over Government Surveillance?	Scott Michelman	71
Leverage in the Board Room: The Unsung Influence of Private Lenders in Corporate Governance	Frederick Tung	115

Essay

After the Bailout: Regulating Systemic Moral Hazard

Karl S. Okamoto

183

Comments

Evaluating The Public Interest: Regulation Of Industrial Hemp Under The Controlled Substances Act	Christine A. Kolosov	237
Improving The Education Of California’s Juvenile Offenders: An Alternative To Consent Decrees	Stefanie Low	275
The Right to Control One’s Name	Julia Shear Kushner	313

Discourse

Getting the Framers Wrong: A Response to Professor Geoffrey Stone	Samuel Calhoun
The Perils of Religious Passion: A Response to Professor Samuel Calhoun	Geoffrey Stone

Th UCLA Law Review is also pleased to announce the launch of a our new website.

UCLA Law Review 56:6 (August 2009)

UCLA Law Review — Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:17:37 +0000

Volume 56, Issue 6 (August 2009)

Articles

Overcoming Overdisclosure: Toward Tax Shelter Detection (pdf)
Joshua D. Blank

First Amendment Enforcement in Government Institutions and Programs (pdf)
Gia B. Lee

Ezra Pound’s Copyright Statute: Perpetual Rights and the Problem of Heirs (pdf)
Robert Spoo

Comments

Nonwaiver Agreements After Federal Rule of Evidence 502: A Glance at Quick-Peek and Clawback Agreements (pdf)
Jessica Wang

Narrowing the Definition of “Dwelling” Under the Fair Housing Act (pdf)
Karen Wong

Addressing Youth Bias Crime (pdf)
Jordan Blair Woods

UCLA Law Review 56:4 (April 2009)

UCLA Law Review — Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:11:55 +0000

Volume 56, Issue 4 (April 2009)

Articles

A Constitutional Birthright: The State, Parentage, and the Rights Of Newborn Persons (pdf)

James G. Dwyer

“Which Is To Be Master,” The Judiciary or the Legislature? When Statutory Directives Violate Separation Of Powers (pdf)

Linda D. Jellum

Normative Methods for Lawyers (pdf)

Joseph William Singer

Comment

Sex Outside of the Therapy Hour: Practical and Constitutional Limits on Therapist Sexual Misconduct Regulations (pdf)

S. Wesley Gorman

UCLA Law Review Discourse

UCLA Law Review — Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:37:21 +0000

56 UCLA Law Review Discourse (December 2008).

Articles

Stephen M. Bainbridge, Reflections on Twenty Years of Law Teaching, 56 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 13 (2008).

UCLA Law Review, Issue 56:2 (December 2008)

UCLA Law Review — Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:06:00 +0000

UCLA Law Review, Issue 56:2 (December 2008).

Articles

Jeffrey Kahn, International Travel and the Constitution, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 271 (2008).

Carol Sanger, Seeing and Believing: Mandatory Ultrasound and the Path to a Protected Choice, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 351 (2008).

William K. Sjostrom, Jr., The Birth of Rule 144A Equity Offerings, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 409 (2008).

Comments

Dale Larson, Unconsciously Regarded as Disabled: Implicit Bias and the Regarded-As Prong of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 451 (2008).

Jordan Blair Woods, Taking the “Hate” Out of Hate Crimes: Applying Unfair Advantage Theory to Justify the Enhanced Punishment of Opportunistic Bias Crimes, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 489 (2008).

UCLA Law Review, Issue 56:1 (October 2008)

UCLA Law Review — Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:46:13 +0000

UCLA Law Review, Issue 56:1 (October 2008).

Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture

Geoffrey R. Stone, The World of the Framers: A Christian Nation?, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 1 (2008).

Articles

Adam M. Gershowitz, The iPhone Meets the Fourth Amendment, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 27 (2008).

Marco J. Jimenez, The Value of a Promise: A Utilitarian Approach to Contract Law Remedies, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 59 (2008).

Sean B. Seymore, Heightened Enablement in the Unpredictable Arts, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 127 (2008).

Comments

Erin J. Cox, Freeing Exercise at Expression’s Expense: When RFRA Privileges the Religiously Motivated Speaker, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 169 (2008).

Adam I. Kaplan, The Case for Comparative Fault in Compensating the Wrongfully Convicted, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 227 (2008).

UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:6 (August 2008)

UCLA Law Review — Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:23:15 +0000

UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:6 (August 2008).

Articles

Ann E. Carlson, Implementing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Caps: A Case Study of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1479 (2008).

Daniel A. Farber, The Place-Based Theory of Standing, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1505 (2008).

Sean B. Hecht, Climate Change and the Transformation of Risk: Insurance Matters, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1559 (2008).

Douglas A. Kysar & Bernadette A. Meyler, Like a Nation State, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1621 (2008).

Cass R. Sunstein, The World vs. the United States and China? The Complex Climate Change Incentives of the Leading Greenhouse Gas Emitters, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1675 (2008).

Michael P. Vandenbergh, Jack Barkenbus & Jonathan Gilligan, Individual Carbon Emissions: The Low-Hanging Fruit, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1701 (2008).

Michael Wara, Measuring the Clean Development Mechanism’s Performance and Potential, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1759 (2008).

Jonathan B. Wiener, Climate Change Policy and Policy Change in China, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1805 (2008).

Jonathan Zasloff, The Judicial Carbon Tax: Reconstructing Public Nuisance and Climate Change, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1827 (2008).

Comments

Alina Ball, An Imperative Redefinition of “Community”: Incorporating Reentry Lawyers to Increase the Efficacy of Community Economic Development Initiatives, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1883 (2008).

Maureen Carroll, Educating Expelled Students After No Child Left Behind: Mending an Incentive Structure That Discourages Alternative Education and Reinstatment, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1909 (2008).

Amy Riley Lucas, Specialty License Plates: The First Amendment and the Intersection of Government Speech and Public Forum Doctrines, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1971 (2008).

UCLA Law Review Discourse

UCLA Law Review — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:00:11 +0000

56 UCLA Law Review Discourse (October 2008).

Articles

Gary Blasi, Lawyers, Clients, and the “Third Person in the Room”, 56 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 1 (2008).

UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:5 (June 2008)

UCLA Law Review — Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:52:00 +0000

UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:5 (June 2008).

Articles

Michelle Wilde Anderson, Cities Inside Out: Race, Poverty, and Exclusion at the Urban Fringe, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1095 (2008).

Jennifer Gordon & R.A. Lenhardt, Rethinking Work and Citizenship, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1161 (2008).

Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr. & Clint A. Carpenter, The Return of Seditious Libel, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1239 (2008).

Adam J. Levitin, Priceless? The Economic Costs of Credit Card Merchant Restraints, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1321 (2008).

Essay

Michael L. Kramer & Michael N. Schmitt, Lawyers on Horseback? Thoughts on Judge Advocates and Civil-Military Relations, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1407 (2008).

Comments

Richard J. Hawkins, Substantially Modifying the Visual Artists Rights Act: A Copyright Proposal for Interpreting the Act’s Prejudicial Modification Clause, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1437 (2008).

UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:4 (April 2008)

UCLA Law Review — Thu, 15 May 2008 10:30:41 +0000

UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:4 (April 2008).

Articles

Josh Bowers, Contraindicated Drug Courts, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 783 (2008).

Noah Sachs, Beyond the Liability Wall: Strengthening Tort Remedies in International Environmental Law, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 837 (2008).

Joanna M. Shepherd, Tort Reforms’ Winners and Losers: The Competing Effects of Care and Activity Levels, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 905 (2008).

John G. Sprankling, Owning the Center of the Earth, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 979 (2008).

Comments

Megan Roberts, The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: Why Considering Individuals One at a Time Creates Untenable Situations for Students and Educators, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1041 (2008).

UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:3 (February 2008)

UCLA Law Review — Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:35:06 +0000

UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:3 (February 2008).

Articles

Stephen M. Bainbridge, The Convergence of Good Faith and Oversight, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 559 (2008).

Kamal Ghali, No Slavery Except as a Punishment for Crime: The Punishment Clause and Sexual Slavery, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 607 (2008).

Caleb E. Mason, An Aesthetic Defense of the Nonprecedential Opinion: The Easy Cases Debate in the Wake of the 2007 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 643 (2008).

Comments

Malinda Lee, Reorienting the Debate on Presidential Signing Statements: The Need for Transparency in the President’s Constitutional Objections, Reservations, and Assertions of Power, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 705 (2008).

Nancy Olson, Does Practice Make Perfect? An Examination of Congress’s Proposed District Court Patent Pilot Program, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 745 (2008).

UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:2 (December, 2007)

UCLA Law Review — Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:16:13 +0000

UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:2 (December 2007).

Articles

Alejandro E. Camacho, Can Regulation Evolve? Lessons From a Study in Maladaptive Management, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 293 (2007).

Susan P. Crawford, The Internet and the Project of Communications Law, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 359 (2007).

Renée McDonald Hutchins, Tied Up in Knotts? GPS Technology and the Fourth Amendment, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 409 (2007).

Comments

Jordan Berman, Overworking the Presumption of Sanity: Clark’s Use of Mental Disease Evidence to Negate Mens Rea, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 467 (2007).

Ross Naughton, State Statutes Limiting the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine: Tools for Tribes to Reclaim Criminal Jurisdiction Stripped by Public Law 280?, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 489 (2007).

Kristen A. Williams, Employing Ex-Offenders: Shifting the Evaluation of Workplace Risks and Opportunities From Employers to Corrections, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 521 (2007).

UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:1 (October 2007)

UCLA Law Review — Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:51:54 +0000

UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:1 (October 2007).

Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture

William W. Fisher III, When Should We Permit Differential Pricing of Information?, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1 (2007).

Articles

Jill E. Fisch, Does Analyst Independence Sell Investors Short?, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 39 (2007).

Kenneth L. Karst, The Liberties of Equal Citizens: Groups and the Due Process Clause, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 99 (2007).

Peter S. Menell & David Nimmer, Legal Realism in Action: Indirect Copyright Liability’s Continuing Tort Framework and Sony’s De Facto Demise, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 143 (2007).

Comments

Richard J. Hawkins, Dysfunctional Equivalence: The New Approach to Defining “Postal Channels” Under the Hague Service Convention, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 205 (2007).

Vanessa A. Lavely, The Path to Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage: Reconciling the Inconsistencies Between Marriage and Adoption Cases, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 247 (2007).

Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project

Daniel Solove — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:10:48 +0000

I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.

The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!

Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.

Participating law reviews thus far include:

* Boston College

* Chicago

* Columbia

* Cornell

* Duke

* Emory

* Fordham

* Georgetown

* GW

* Harvard

* Indiana

* Michigan

* Minnesota

* NYU

* Northwestern

* Notre Dame

* Southern California

* Stanford

* Texas

* UCLA

* Vanderbilt

* Virginia

* Washington University

* Yale

We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.

We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.

Announcing the Law Review Forum Project

Daniel Solove — Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:04:13 +0000

I am very pleased to announce a new project here at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Forum Project. We will be hosting online forums for several law reviews. Increasingly, law reviews are creating online forums as companions to their regular law review issues. These forums contain very short response pieces, essays, debates, and other works that attempt to bridge the gap between regular legal scholarship and the blogosphere.

Journals seeking to create their own online forum face two daunting challenges. First, they must create and actively maintain a web presence. Second, they must find ways to attract readers, which is difficult in an age where so many blogs and other websites exist. A wide readership for a website depends upon having daily content. Law review forums produce content sporadically throughout the year at intervals that are not regular enough to attract a significant readership.

Therefore, we have invited a number of law reviews to participate in a partnership with our blog. Throughout the year, each law review will periodically post forum essays here at Concurring Opinions. We are not requiring an exclusive license, so participating law reviews can also cross-post at their own websites.

We see this as a mutually-beneficial arrangement. We can bring great content to our blog, and law reviews can reach our significant audience without the pressures of having to build and maintain an online readership or of having to produce content with regularity.

Law reviews currently with and without existing forums will be participating. Thus far, the following law reviews have agreed to participate:

* Harvard Law Review

* Virginia Law Review

* Michigan Law Review

* University of Pennsylvania Law Review

* Northwestern Law Review

* UCLA Law Review

* George Washington Law Review

In the near future, we hope to be expanding the list of participating law reviews.