Site Meter

Category: Law Rev (Stanford)

0

Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:2 (November 2008)

Banner Draft 5.jpg

ARTICLES

Rethinking Constitutional Welfare Rights

Goodwin Liu

Corporate Crime and Deterrence

Assaf Hamdani & Alon Klement

The Surprising Virtues of Treating Trade Secrets as IP Rights

Mark A. Lemley

Ask, Don’t Tell: Ethical Issues Surrounding Undocumented Workers’ Status in Employment Litigation

Christine N. Cimini

RESPONSE

Military Lawyering and Professional Independence in the War on Terror: A Response to David Luban

Major General Charles J. Dunlap, Jr. & Major Linell A. Letendre

COMMENT

FEC v. Wisconsin Right to . . . Petition?: A Comment on FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life

Shireen A. Barday

7

Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project

table-of-contents1.jpg

I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.

The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!

Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.

Participating law reviews thus far include:

* Boston College

* Chicago

* Columbia

* Cornell

* Duke

* Emory

* Fordham

* Georgetown

* GW

* Harvard

* Indiana

* Michigan

* Minnesota

* NYU

* Northwestern

* Notre Dame

* Southern California

* Stanford

* Texas

* UCLA

* Vanderbilt

* Virginia

* Washington University

* Yale

We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.

We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.