Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:6 (April 2009)

SYMPOSIUM: MEDIA, JUSTICE, AND THE LAW

Introduction

ARTICLES

Investigating the ‘CSI Effect’ Effect: Media and Litigation Crisis in Criminal Law

Simon A. Cole & Rachel Dioso-Villa

Criminal Madness: Cultural Iconography and Insanity

Russell D. Covey

Virtue and Vice: Who Will Report on the Failings of the Criminal Justice System?

William R. Montross & Patrick Mulvaney

Racing the Closet

Russell K. Robinson

NOTE

Ex Parte Blogging: The Legal Ethics of Supreme Court Advocacy in the Internet Era

Rachel C. Lee

Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:5 (March 2009)

ARTICLES

Jurisdiction’s Noble Lie

Frederic M. Bloom

The Injustice of Appearance

Deborah L. Rhode

Private Immigration Screening in the Workplace

Stephen Lee

The Law, Culture, and Economics of Fashion

C. Scott Hemphill & Jeannie Suk

RESPONSE

The Piracy Paradox Revisited

Kal Raustiala & Christopher Sprigman

REPLY

Remix and Cultural Production

C. Scott Hemphill & Jeannie Suk

NOTES

Pleading Sovereign Immunity: The Doctrinal Underpinnings of Hans v. Louisiana and Ex Parte Young

Sina Kian

Who May Be Tried Under the Military Commissions Act of 2006?

Michael Montaño

Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:4 (February 2009)

ARTICLES

Viewpoint Diversity and Media Consolidation: An Empirical Study

Daniel E. Ho & Kevin M. Quinn

Institutional Design and the Policing of Prosecutors: Lessons from Administrative Law

Rachel E. Barkow

NOTES

The Reasonable Child Declarant After Davis v. Washington

Christopher Cannon Funk

Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:3 (December 2008)

ARTICLES

The Functions of Standing

Heather Elliott

The Myth of the Generalist Judge

Edward K. Cheng

Soft Law: Lessons from Congressional Practice

Jacob E. Gersen & Eric A. Posner

Legislative Threats

Guy Halfteck

NOTES

Punitive Damages, Remunerated Research, and the Legal Profession

Shireen A. Barday

The Right of Confrontation, Ongoing Emergencies, and the Violent-Perpetrator-at-Large Problem

Scott G. Stewart

ARTICLES

Rethinking Constitutional Welfare Rights

Goodwin Liu

Corporate Crime and Deterrence

Assaf Hamdani & Alon Klement

The Surprising Virtues of Treating Trade Secrets as IP Rights

Mark A. Lemley

Ask, Don’t Tell: Ethical Issues Surrounding Undocumented Workers’ Status in Employment Litigation

Christine N. Cimini

RESPONSE

Military Lawyering and Professional Independence in the War on Terror: A Response to David Luban

Major General Charles J. Dunlap, Jr. & Major Linell A. Letendre

COMMENT

FEC v. Wisconsin Right to . . . Petition?: A Comment on FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life

Shireen A. Barday

Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:1 (October 2008)

ARTICLES

Mandatory Rules

Scott Dodson

Super Medians

Lee Epstein & Tonja Jacobi

The End of Privacy

Jed Rubenfeld

Holmes on Emergencies

Adrian Vermeule

I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.

The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have [...]]]>

I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.

The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!

Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.

Participating law reviews thus far include:

* Boston College

* Chicago

* Columbia

* Cornell

* Duke

* Emory

* Fordham

* Georgetown

* GW

* Harvard

* Indiana

* Michigan

* Minnesota

* NYU

* Northwestern

* Notre Dame

* Southern California

* Stanford

* Texas

* UCLA

* Vanderbilt

* Virginia

* Washington University

* Yale

We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.

We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.