Archive for the ‘Law Rev (Stanford)’ Category
Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:6 (April 2009)
posted by Stanford Law Review
Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:6 (April 2009)
SYMPOSIUM: MEDIA, JUSTICE, AND THE LAW
ARTICLES
Investigating the ‘CSI Effect’ Effect: Media and Litigation Crisis in Criminal Law
Simon A. Cole & Rachel Dioso-Villa
Criminal Madness: Cultural Iconography and Insanity
Russell D. Covey
Virtue and Vice: Who Will Report on the Failings of the Criminal Justice System?
William R. Montross & Patrick Mulvaney
Russell K. Robinson
NOTE
Ex Parte Blogging: The Legal Ethics of Supreme Court Advocacy in the Internet Era
Rachel C. Lee
May 27, 2009 at 6:12 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev Contents, Uncategorized
Print This Post
No Comments
Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:5 (March 2009)
posted by Stanford Law Review
Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:5 (March 2009)
ARTICLES
Frederic M. Bloom
Deborah L. Rhode
Private Immigration Screening in the Workplace
Stephen Lee
The Law, Culture, and Economics of Fashion
C. Scott Hemphill & Jeannie Suk
RESPONSE
Kal Raustiala & Christopher Sprigman
REPLY
C. Scott Hemphill & Jeannie Suk
NOTES
Pleading Sovereign Immunity: The Doctrinal Underpinnings of Hans v. Louisiana and Ex Parte Young
Sina Kian
Who May Be Tried Under the Military Commissions Act of 2006?
Michael Montaño
May 27, 2009 at 6:00 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
One Comment
Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:4 (February 2009)
posted by Stanford Law Review
Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:4 (February 2009)
ARTICLES
Viewpoint Diversity and Media Consolidation: An Empirical Study
Daniel E. Ho & Kevin M. Quinn
Institutional Design and the Policing of Prosecutors: Lessons from Administrative Law
Rachel E. Barkow
NOTES
The Reasonable Child Declarant After Davis v. Washington
Christopher Cannon Funk
April 6, 2009 at 2:40 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments
Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:3 (December 2008)
posted by Stanford Law Review
Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:3 (December 2008)
ARTICLES
Heather Elliott
The Myth of the Generalist Judge
Edward K. Cheng
Soft Law: Lessons from Congressional Practice
Jacob E. Gersen & Eric A. Posner
Guy Halfteck
NOTES
Punitive Damages, Remunerated Research, and the Legal Profession
Shireen A. Barday
The Right of Confrontation, Ongoing Emergencies, and the Violent-Perpetrator-at-Large Problem
Scott G. Stewart
February 18, 2009 at 1:41 am
Posted in: Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
One Comment
Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:2 (November 2008)
posted by Stanford Law Review
ARTICLES
Rethinking Constitutional Welfare Rights
Goodwin Liu
Corporate Crime and Deterrence
Assaf Hamdani & Alon Klement
The Surprising Virtues of Treating Trade Secrets as IP Rights
Mark A. Lemley
Ask, Don’t Tell: Ethical Issues Surrounding Undocumented Workers’ Status in Employment Litigation
Christine N. Cimini
RESPONSE
Military Lawyering and Professional Independence in the War on Terror: A Response to David Luban
Major General Charles J. Dunlap, Jr. & Major Linell A. Letendre
COMMENT
FEC v. Wisconsin Right to . . . Petition?: A Comment on FEC v. Wisconsin Right to Life
Shireen A. Barday
January 29, 2009 at 9:35 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments
Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:1 (October 2008)
posted by Stanford Law Review
Stanford Law Review, Issue 61:1 (October 2008)
ARTICLES
Scott Dodson
Lee Epstein & Tonja Jacobi
Jed Rubenfeld
Adrian Vermeule
October 29, 2008 at 9:21 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments
Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project
posted by Daniel Solove
I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.
The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!
Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.
Participating law reviews thus far include:
* Boston College
* Chicago
* Columbia
* Cornell
* Duke
* Emory
* Fordham
* Georgetown
* GW
* Harvard
* Indiana
* Michigan
* Minnesota
* NYU
* Northwestern
* Notre Dame
* Southern California
* Stanford
* Texas
* UCLA
* Vanderbilt
* Virginia
* Washington University
* Yale
We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.
We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.
November 13, 2007 at 12:10 am
Posted in: Administrative Announcements, Law Rev (Boston College), Law Rev (Chicago), Law Rev (Columbia), Law Rev (Cornell), Law Rev (Duke), Law Rev (Emory), Law Rev (Fordham), Law Rev (GW), Law Rev (Georgetown), Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev (Indiana), Law Rev (Michigan), Law Rev (Minnesota), Law Rev (NYU), Law Rev (Northwestern), Law Rev (Notre Dame), Law Rev (S Cal), Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev (Texas), Law Rev (UCLA), Law Rev (Vanderbilt), Law Rev (Virginia), Law Rev (Yale), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
7 Comments
