<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Law Rev (NYU)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/category/law-rev-nyu/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 85:1 (April 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/27396.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/27396.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 13:35:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/27396.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[










Volume 85
April 2010
Number 1



<p>&#160;</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>The New Poor at Our Gates: Global Justice Implications for International Trade and Tax Law </p>
<p>Ilan Benshalom</p>
<p>The Anti-Stereotyping Principle in Constitutional Sex Discrimination Law </p>
<p>Cary Franklin</p>
<p>Blind Expertise</p>
<p>Christopher Tarver Robertson</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>Maintaining Educational Adequacy in Times of Recession:  Judicial Review of State Education Budget Cuts </p>
<p>Vinay Harpalani</p>
<p>Aggregate Reliance and Overcharges: Removing Hurdles to Class Certification for Victims of Mass Fraud </p>
<p>Shawn S. Ledingham, Jr.</p>
<p>Global Institutional Choice </p>
<p>Frederick J. Lee</p>
<p>Improving the Protection of Species Endangered in the United States by Revising the Distinct Population Segment Policy </p>
<p>Allison L. Westfahl Kong</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="width: 100%" border="0" bgcolor="#111d5f">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" alt="New York University Law Review" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<table style="width: 100%" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 85</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">April 2010</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_065472.pdf">The New Poor at Our Gates: Global Justice Implications for International Trade and Tax Law </a></p>
<p><em>Ilan Benshalom</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_065473.pdf">The Anti-Stereotyping Principle in Constitutional Sex Discrimination Law </a></p>
<p><em>Cary Franklin</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv1/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_065474.pdf">Blind Expertise</a></p>
<p><em>Christopher Tarver Robertson</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv1/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_065475.pdf">Maintaining Educational Adequacy in Times of Recession:  Judicial Review of State Education Budget Cuts </a></p>
<p><em>Vinay Harpalani</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv1/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_065476.pdf">Aggregate Reliance and Overcharges: Removing Hurdles to Class Certification for Victims of Mass Fraud </a></p>
<p><em>Shawn S. Ledingham, Jr.</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv1/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_065477.pdf">Global Institutional Choice </a></p>
<p><em>Frederick J. Lee</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv1/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_065478.pdf">Improving the Protection of Species Endangered in the United States by Revising the Distinct Population Segment Policy </a></p>
<p><em>Allison L. Westfahl Kong</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/27396.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 84:6 (December 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/new-york-university-law-review-846-december-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/new-york-university-law-review-846-december-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 Jan 2010 17:31:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=23847</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[










Volume 84
December 2009
Number 6



<p>&#160;</p>
<p>THOMAS M. FRANCK TRIBUTE</p>
<p>Professor Thomas M. Franck</p>
<p>Richard L. Revesz</p>
<p>Remembering Thomas Franck</p>
<p>Thomas Buergenthal</p>
<p>Thomas M. Franck</p>
<p>Normen Dorsen</p>
<p>In Memoriam: Thomas M. Franck (1931-2009)</p>
<p>Michael J. Glennon</p>
<p>The Invisible College of Thomas Franck </p>
<p>Harold Hongju Koh, Miriam E. Saprio, Christopher J. Borgen, Peter A. Gutherie &#38; Michael J. Mattler</p>
<p>Thomas M. Franck: A Selected Bibliography</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>The Rights of Migrants: An Optimal Contract Framework</p>
<p>Adam B. Cox &#38; Eric A. Posner</p>
<p>Protecting Them from Themselves: The Persistence of Mutual Benefits Arguments for Sex and Race Inequality</p>
<p>Jill Elaine Hasday</p>
<p>Tax Expenditures and Global Labor Mobility</p>
<p>Ruth Mason</p>
<p>&#160;</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>Reining in Non-State Actors: State Responsibility and Attribution in Cases of Genocide</p>
<p>Berglind Halldorsdottir Birkland</p>
<p>Preventing Real Takings for Imaginary Purposes: A Post-Kelo Public Use Proposal</p>
<p>William A. Curran</p>
<p>An Administrative Law Approach to Reforming the State Secrets Privilege</p>
<p>Beth George</p>
<p>Paying-to-Play in Securities Class Actions: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="width: 100%" border="0" bgcolor="#111d5f">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" alt="New York University Law Review" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<table style="width: 100%" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 84</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">December 2009</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 6</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>THOMAS M. FRANCK TRIBUTE</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064057.pdf">Professor Thomas M. Franck</a></p>
<p><em>Richard L. Revesz</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064058.pdf">Remembering Thomas Franck</a></p>
<p><em>Thomas Buergenthal</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064059.pdf">Thomas M. Franck</a></p>
<p><em>Normen Dorsen</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064060.pdf">In Memoriam: Thomas M. Franck (1931-2009)</a></p>
<p><em>Michael J. Glennon</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064061.pdf">The Invisible College of Thomas Franck </a></p>
<p><em>Harold Hongju Koh, Miriam E. Saprio, Christopher J. Borgen, Peter A. Gutherie &amp; Michael J. Mattler</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064062.pdf">Thomas M. Franck: A Selected Bibliography</a></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064063.pdf">The Rights of Migrants: An Optimal Contract Framework</a></p>
<p><em>Adam B. Cox &amp; Eric A. Posner</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064064.pdf">Protecting Them from Themselves: The Persistence of Mutual Benefits Arguments for Sex and Race Inequality</a></p>
<p><em>Jill Elaine Hasday</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064065.pdf">Tax Expenditures and Global Labor Mobility</a></p>
<p><em>Ruth Mason</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064066.pdf">Reining in Non-State Actors: State Responsibility and Attribution in Cases of Genocide</a></p>
<p><em>Berglind Halldorsdottir Birkland</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064067.pdf">Preventing Real Takings for Imaginary Purposes: A Post-Kelo Public Use Proposal</a></p>
<p><em>William A. Curran</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064068.pdf">An Administrative Law Approach to Reforming the State Secrets Privilege</a></p>
<p><em>Beth George</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064069.pdf">Paying-to-Play in Securities Class Actions: A Look at Lawyers&#8217; Campaign Contributions</a></p>
<p><em>Drew T. Johnson-Skinner</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064070.pdf">Blameless Ignorance? The Ledbetter Act and Limitations Period for Title VII Pay Discrimination Claims</a></p>
<p><em>Jeremy A. Weinberg</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_064071.pdf">The Choice-of-Law Problem(s) in the Class Action Context</a></p>
<p><em>Genevieve G. York-Erwin</em></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/new-york-university-law-review-846-december-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 84:5 (November 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/new-york-university-law-review-845-november-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/new-york-university-law-review-845-november-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[










Volume 84
November 2009
Number 5



<p>&#160;
BRENNAN LECTURE</p>
<p>The Reach of State Corporate Law Beyond State Borders: Reflections Upon Federalism</p>
<p>The Honorable Jack B. Jacobs
&#160;
ARTICLES</p>
<p>Internal Poison Pills</p>
<p>George S. Geis</p>
<p>Existing Uses and the Limits of Land Use Regulations</p>
<p>Christopher Serkin
&#160;
NOTES</p>
<p>The Costs of &#8220;Discernible and Manageable Standards&#8221; in Vieth and Beyond</p>
<p>Joshua S. Stillman</p>
<p>The Constitutional Life of Legislative Instructions in America</p>
<p>Christopher Terranova</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="width: 100%" border="0" bgcolor="#111d5f">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" alt="New York University Law Review" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<table style="width: 100%" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 84</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">November 2009</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
<strong>BRENNAN LECTURE</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063660.pdf">The Reach of State Corporate Law Beyond State Borders: Reflections Upon Federalism</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Jack B. Jacobs</em><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063661.pdf">Internal Poison Pills</a></p>
<p><em>George S. Geis</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063662.pdf">Existing Uses and the Limits of Land Use Regulations</a></p>
<p><em>Christopher Serkin</em><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063663.pdf">The Costs of &#8220;Discernible and Manageable Standards&#8221; in <em>Vieth</em> and Beyond</a></p>
<p><em>Joshua S. Stillman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063664.pdf">The Constitutional Life of Legislative Instructions in America</a></p>
<p><em>Christopher Terranova</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/new-york-university-law-review-845-november-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 84:4 (October 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/new-york-university-law-review-844-october-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/new-york-university-law-review-844-october-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[










Volume 84
October 2009
Number 4



<p>&#160;
ARTICLES</p>
<p>Cruelty, Prison Conditions, and the Eighth Amendment </p>
<p>Sharon Dolovich</p>
<p>Are All Legal Probabilities Created Equal? </p>
<p>Yuval Feldman &#38; Doron Teichman</p>
<p>Contract Design and the Structure of Contractual Intent </p>
<p>Jody S. Kraus &#38; Robert E. Scott
&#160;</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>Privacy, Free Speech, and the Patriot Act: First and Fourth Amendment Limits on National Security Letters </p>
<p>Patrick P. Garlinger</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="width: 100%" border="0" bgcolor="#111d5f">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" alt="New York University Law Review" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<table style="width: 100%" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 84</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">October 2009</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
<strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063495.pdf">Cruelty, Prison Conditions, and the Eighth Amendment </a></p>
<p><em>Sharon Dolovich</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063496.pdf">Are All Legal Probabilities Created Equal? </a></p>
<p><em>Yuval Feldman &amp; Doron Teichman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063497.pdf">Contract Design and the Structure of Contractual Intent </a></p>
<p><em>Jody S. Kraus &amp; Robert E. Scott</em><br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063498.pdf">Privacy, Free Speech, and the Patriot Act: First and Fourth Amendment Limits on National Security Letters </a></p>
<p><em>Patrick P. Garlinger</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/new-york-university-law-review-844-october-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 84:3 (June 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/new-york-university-law-review-843-june-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/new-york-university-law-review-843-june-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=18447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[










Volume 84
June 2009
Number 3



TRIBUTES</p>
<p>Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye</p>
<p>Chief Judge Kaye:  A Creative Reformer</p>
<p>The Honorable Stephen G. Breyer</p>
<p>Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye:  A Modern-Day Arthur Vanderbilt</p>
<p>Samuel Estreicher &#38; Oscar G. Chase </p>
<p>In Praise of Judith S. Kaye </p>
<p>The Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg</p>
<p>Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye:  A Visionary Third Branch Leader</p>
<p>The Honorable Jonathan Lippman</p>
<p>A Distinguished Path in Public Service</p>
<p>The Honorable Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor</p>
<p>Not a Mute Swan</p>
<p>Ellen Schall</p>
<p>Judith Kaye as a Chief Among Chiefs</p>
<p>The Honorable Randall T. Shepard</p>
<p>Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye:  Proud to Call Her One of Our Own</p>
<p>Richard L. Revesz</p>
<p>A Portrait of Judith S. Kaye</p>
<p>The Honorable Richard C. Wesley </p>
<p>MADISON LECTURE</p>
<p>Securing Fragile Foundations:  Affirmative Constitutional Adjudication in Federal Courts</p>
<p>The Honorable Marsha S. Berzon</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>Myth of Mess?  International Choice of Law [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="width: 100%;" border="0" bgcolor="#111d5f">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" alt="New York University Law Review" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<table style="width: 100%;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 84</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">June 2009</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr /><strong>TRIBUTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062383.pdf">Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye</a></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062384.pdf">Chief Judge Kaye:  A Creative Reformer</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Stephen G. Breyer</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062385.pdf">Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye:  A Modern-Day Arthur Vanderbilt</a></p>
<p><em>Samuel Estreicher &amp; Oscar G. Chase </em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062392.pdf">In Praise of Judith S. Kaye </a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062393.pdf">Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye:  A Visionary Third Branch Leader</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Jonathan Lippman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062394.pdf">A Distinguished Path in Public Service</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062396.pdf">Not a Mute Swan</a></p>
<p><em>Ellen Schall</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062397.pdf">Judith Kaye as a Chief Among Chiefs</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Randall T. Shepard</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062395.pdf">Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye:  Proud to Call Her One of Our Own</a></p>
<p><em>Richard L. Revesz</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062398.pdf">A Portrait of Judith S. Kaye</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Richard C. Wesley </em></p>
<p><strong>MADISON LECTURE</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062378.pdf">Securing Fragile Foundations:  Affirmative Constitutional Adjudication in Federal Courts</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Marsha S. Berzon</em></p>
<p><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062379.pdf">Myth of Mess?  International Choice of Law in Action</a></p>
<p><em>Christopher A. Whytock</em></p>
<p><strong>ESSAYS</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062380.pdf">Rethinking the Federal Role in State Criminal Justice</a></p>
<p><em>Joseph L. Hoffman &amp; Nancy J. King</em></p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062381.pdf">In Search of an Enforceable Medical Malpractice Exculpatory Agreement:  Introducting Confidential Contracts as a Solution to the Doctor-Patient Relationship Problem </a></p>
<p><em>Matthew J.B. Lawrence</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/new-york-university-law-review-843-june-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 84:2 (May 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/new-york-university-law-review-842-may-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/new-york-university-law-review-842-may-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 17:11:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16295</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[










Volume 84
May 2009
Number 2



ARTICLES</p>
<p>Categoricalism and Balancing in First and Second Amendment Analysis</p>
<p>Joseph Blocher</p>
<p>A Theory of Taxing Sovereign Wealth</p>
<p>Victor Fleischer</p>
<p>Toward Procedural Optionality: Private Ordering of Public Adjudication</p>
<p>Robert J. Rhee</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>A Relational Approach to Schools&#8217; Regulation of Youth Online Speech</p>
<p>Benjamin F. Heidlage</p>
<p>Toward Constitutional Minority Recruitment and Retention Programs: A Narrowly Tailored Approach</p>
<p>Ellison S. Ward</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="width: 100%;" border="0" bgcolor="#111d5f">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" alt="New York University Law Review" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<table style="width: 100%;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 84</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">May 2009</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 2</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr /><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062099.pdf">Categoricalism and Balancing in First and Second Amendment Analysis</a></p>
<p><em>Joseph Blocher</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062102.pdf">A Theory of Taxing Sovereign Wealth</a></p>
<p><em>Victor Fleischer</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062100.pdf">Toward Procedural Optionality: Private Ordering of Public Adjudication</a></p>
<p><em>Robert J. Rhee</em></p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062103.pdf">A Relational Approach to Schools&#8217; Regulation of Youth Online Speech</a></p>
<p><em>Benjamin F. Heidlage</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062101.pdf">Toward Constitutional Minority Recruitment and Retention Programs: A Narrowly Tailored Approach</a></p>
<p><em>Ellison S. Ward</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/new-york-university-law-review-842-may-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 84:1 (April 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/new_york_univer_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/new_york_univer_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:13:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/04/new-york-university-law-review-841-april-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[










Volume 84
April 2009
Number 1



ARTICLES</p>
<p>Originalism Is Bunk</p>
<p>MItchell N. Berman</p>
<p>Class Certification in the Age of Aggregate Proof </p>
<p>Richard A. Nagareda</p>
<p>Temporary-Effect Legislation, Political Accountability, and Fiscal Restraint </p>
<p>George K. Yin</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>Limiting Preemption in Environmental Law: An Analysis of the Cost-Externalization Argument and California Assembly Bill 1493</p>
<p>Brian T. Burgess</p>
<p>The Implementation of &#8220;Balanced Diversity&#8221; Through the Class Action Fairness Act</p>
<p>Jacob R. Karabell</p>
<p>New Dirty War Judgments in Argentina: National Courts and Domestic Prosecutions of International Human Rights Violations</p>
<p>Margarita K. O&#8217;Donnell</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="width: 100%;" border="0" bgcolor="#111d5f">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" alt="New York University Law Review" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<table style="width: 100%;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 84</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">April 2009</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 1</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr /><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv1/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_061536.pdf">Originalism Is Bunk</a></p>
<p><em>MItchell N. Berman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_061537.pdf">Class Certification in the Age of Aggregate Proof </a></p>
<p><em>Richard A. Nagareda</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_061538.pdf">Temporary-Effect Legislation, Political Accountability, and Fiscal Restraint </a></p>
<p><em>George K. Yin</em></p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_061539.pdf">Limiting Preemption in Environmental Law: An Analysis of the Cost-Externalization Argument and California Assembly Bill 1493</a></p>
<p><em>Brian T. Burgess</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_061540.pdf">The Implementation of &#8220;Balanced Diversity&#8221; Through the Class Action Fairness Act</a></p>
<p><em>Jacob R. Karabell</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv3/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_061541.pdf">New Dirty War Judgments in Argentina: National Courts and Domestic Prosecutions of International Human Rights Violations</a></p>
<p><em>Margarita K. O&#8217;Donnell</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/new_york_univer_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 83:6 (December 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/new_york_univer_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/new_york_univer_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 03:39:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/01/new-york-university-law-review-836-december-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[







Volume 83
December 2008
Number 6


</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>Efficient Breach Theory Through the Looking Glass</p>
<p>Barry E. Adler</p>
<p>Three Pictures of Contract:  Duty, Power, and Compound Rule</p>
<p>Gregory Klass</p>
<p>Judicial Review of Legislative Purpose</p>
<p>Caleb Nelson</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>An Unfree Trade in Ideas:  How OFAC&#8217;s Regulations Restrain First Amendment Rights</p>
<p>Tracy J. Chin</p>
<p>Valuing the Federal Right:  Reevaluating the Outer Limits of Supplemental Jurisdiction</p>
<p>Neel K. Chopra</p>
<p>Is Private Securities Litigation Essential for the Development of China&#8217;s Stock Markets?</p>
<p>Marlon A. Layton</p>
<p>Things Better Left Unwritten?:  Constitutional Text and the Rule of Law</p>
<p>Jane Pek</p>
<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%" bgcolor="#111D5f">
<tr>
<td align="center"><img alt="New York University Law Review" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
<hr style="border-top: 1px solid #000; border-bottom: 1px solid #000; color: #fff;  background-color: #fff; height: 3px;">
<table width="100%">
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 83</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">December 2008</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 6</td>
</tr>
</table>
<hr style="border-top: 1px solid #000; border-bottom: 1px solid #000; color: #fff;  background-color: #fff; height: 3px;"></p>
<p><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_060012.pdf">Efficient Breach Theory Through the Looking Glass</a></p>
<p><em>Barry E. Adler</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv1/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_060013.pdf">Three Pictures of Contract:  Duty, Power, and Compound Rule</a></p>
<p><em>Gregory Klass</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv1/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_060014.pdf">Judicial Review of Legislative Purpose</a></p>
<p><em>Caleb Nelson</em></p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv1/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_060015.pdf">An Unfree Trade in Ideas:  How OFAC&#8217;s Regulations Restrain First Amendment Rights</a></p>
<p><em>Tracy J. Chin</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv1/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_060016.pdf">Valuing the Federal Right:  Reevaluating the Outer Limits of Supplemental Jurisdiction</a></p>
<p><em>Neel K. Chopra</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv1/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_060017.pdf">Is Private Securities Litigation Essential for the Development of China&#8217;s Stock Markets?</a></p>
<p><em>Marlon A. Layton</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv1/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_060018.pdf">Things Better Left Unwritten?:  Constitutional Text and the Rule of Law</a></p>
<p><em>Jane Pek</em></p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/new_york_univer_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 83:5 (November 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/new_york_univer.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/new_york_univer.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 04:08:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/new-york-university-law-review-835-november-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[







Volume 83
November 2008
Number 5


</p>
<p>BRENNAN LECTURE</p>
<p>Evidence-Based Judicial Discretion:  Promoting Public Safety Through State Sentencing Reform</p>
<p>The Honorable Michael A. Wolff</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p></p>
<p>The Unconscionability Game:  Strategic Judging and the Evolution of Federal Arbitration Law</p>
<p>Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl</p>
<p>The Upside of Overbreadth</p>
<p>Samuel W. Buell</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>Using Structural Interdicts and the South African Human Rights Commission To Achieve Judicial Enforcement of Economic and Social Rights in South Africa</p>
<p>Mitra Ebadolahi</p>
<p></p>
<p>How To Fix the Inconsistent Application of Forum Non Conveniens to Latin American Jurisdiction—And Why Consistency May Not Be Enough</p>
<p>Rajeev Muttreja</p>
<p>Providing Effective Remedies to Victims of Abuse by Peacekeeping Personnel</p>
<p>Catherine E. Sweetser</p>
<p></p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%" bgcolor="#111D5f">
<tr>
<td align="center"><img alt="New York University Law Review" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
<hr style="border-top: 1px solid #000; border-bottom: 1px solid #000; color: #fff;  background-color: #fff; height: 3px;">
<table width="100%">
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 83</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">November 2008</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 5</td>
</tr>
</table>
<hr style="border-top: 1px solid #000; border-bottom: 1px solid #000; color: #fff;  background-color: #fff; height: 3px;"></p>
<p><strong>BRENNAN LECTURE</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number5/ECM_PRO_059794">Evidence-Based Judicial Discretion:  Promoting Public Safety Through State Sentencing Reform</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Michael A. Wolff</em></p>
<p><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number5/ECM_PRO_059795"></p>
<p>The Unconscionability Game:  Strategic Judging and the Evolution of Federal Arbitration Law</a></p>
<p><em>Aaron-Andrew P. Bruhl</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number5/ECM_PRO_059796">The Upside of Overbreadth</a></p>
<p><em>Samuel W. Buell</em></p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number5/ECM_PRO_059797">Using Structural Interdicts and the South African Human Rights Commission To Achieve Judicial Enforcement of Economic and Social Rights in South Africa</a></p>
<p><em>Mitra Ebadolahi</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number5/ECM_PRO_059798"></p>
<p>How To Fix the Inconsistent Application of Forum Non Conveniens to Latin American Jurisdiction—And Why Consistency May Not Be Enough</a></p>
<p><em>Rajeev Muttreja</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number5/ECM_PRO_059799">Providing Effective Remedies to Victims of Abuse by Peacekeeping Personnel</a></p>
<p><em>Catherine E. Sweetser</em></p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/new_york_univer.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 83:4 (October 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/new_york_univer_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/new_york_univer_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Oct 2008 07:50:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/new-york-university-law-review-834-october-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[







Volume 83
October 2008
Number 4


</p>
<p>SYMPOSIUM: THE HART-FULLER DEBATE AT FIFTY</p>
<p>Foreword:  Fifty Years Later</p>
<p>The Grudge Informer Case Revisited</p>
<p>David Dyzenhaus</p>
<p>Positivism and the Inseparability of Law and Morals</p>
<p>Leslie Green</p>
<p>Philosophy, Political Morality, and History:  Explaining the Enduring Resonance of the Hart-Fuller Debate</p>
<p>Nicola Lacey</p>
<p>Better To See Law This Way</p>
<p>Liam Murphy</p>
<p>A Critical Guide to Vehicles in the Park</p>
<p>Frederick Schauer</p>
<p>Positivism and Legality:  Hart’s Equivocal Response to Fuller</p>
<p>Jeremy Waldron</p>
<p>Practical Positivism Versus Practical Perfectionism:  The Hart-Fuller Debate at Fifty</p>
<p>Benjamin C. Zipursky</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>The Resolution of Contested Elections in the U.S. House of Representatives:  Why State Courts Should Not Help with the House Work</p>
<p>Kristen R. Lisk</p>
<p>The Costs of Waiver:  Cost-Benefit Analysis as a New Basis for Selective Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege</p>
<p>Mathew S. Miller</p>
<p>Rethinking the Narrative on Judicial Deference in Student Speech Cases</p>
<p>Sean [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table width="100%" bgcolor="#111D5f">
<tr>
<td align="center"><img alt="New York University Law Review" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</table>
<hr style="border-top: 1px solid #000; border-bottom: 1px solid #000; color: #fff;  background-color: #fff; height: 3px;">
<table width="100%">
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 83</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">October 2008</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 4</td>
</tr>
</table>
<hr style="border-top: 1px solid #000; border-bottom: 1px solid #000; color: #fff;  background-color: #fff; height: 3px;"></p>
<p><strong>SYMPOSIUM: THE HART-FULLER DEBATE AT FIFTY</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059772">Foreword:  Fifty Years Later</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059774">The Grudge Informer Case Revisited</a></p>
<p><em>David Dyzenhaus</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059775">Positivism and the Inseparability of Law and Morals</a></p>
<p><em>Leslie Green</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059776">Philosophy, Political Morality, and History:  Explaining the Enduring Resonance of the Hart-Fuller Debate</a></p>
<p><em>Nicola Lacey</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059777">Better To See Law This Way</a></p>
<p><em>Liam Murphy</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059778">A Critical Guide to Vehicles in the Park</a></p>
<p><em>Frederick Schauer</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059779">Positivism and Legality:  Hart’s Equivocal Response to Fuller</a></p>
<p><em>Jeremy Waldron</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059780">Practical Positivism Versus Practical Perfectionism:  The Hart-Fuller Debate at Fifty</a></p>
<p><em>Benjamin C. Zipursky</em></p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059781">The Resolution of Contested Elections in the U.S. House of Representatives:  Why State Courts Should Not Help with the House Work</a></p>
<p><em>Kristen R. Lisk</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059782">The Costs of Waiver:  Cost-Benefit Analysis as a New Basis for Selective Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege</a></p>
<p><em>Mathew S. Miller</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059783">Rethinking the Narrative on Judicial Deference in Student Speech Cases</a></p>
<p><em>Sean R. Nuttall</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059784">Warrantless Location Tracking</a></p>
<p><em>Ian James Samuel</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/journals/lawreview/issues/vol832008/number4/ECM_PRO_059785">Resetting Scales:  An Examination of Due Process Rights in Material Support Prosecutions</a></p>
<p><em>Benjamin Yaster</em></p>
<p><br/><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/new_york_univer_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/announcing_the_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/announcing_the_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Solove</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Chicago)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Columbia)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (GW)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Harvard)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Indiana)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Michigan)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Minnesota)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Northwestern)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Notre Dame)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (S Cal)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Stanford)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Texas)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Vanderbilt)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Virginia)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Yale)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/11/announcing-the-law-review-table-of-contents-project.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project.  We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.</p>
<p>The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool.  Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult.  If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published.  Now you don’t have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="table-of-contents1.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/table-of-contents1.jpg" width="379" height="293" ></p>
<p>I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the <a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/law_rev_contents/">Law Review Table of Contents Project</a>.  We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.</p>
<p>The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool.  Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult.  If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published.  Now you don’t have to.   Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!</p>
<p>Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called <a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/law_rev_contents/">Law Rev Contents</a> – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.</p>
<p>Participating law reviews thus far include:</p>
<p>* Boston College</p>
<p>* Chicago</p>
<p>* Columbia</p>
<p>* Cornell</p>
<p>* Duke</p>
<p>* Emory</p>
<p>* Fordham</p>
<p>* Georgetown</p>
<p>* GW</p>
<p>* Harvard</p>
<p>* Indiana</p>
<p>* Michigan</p>
<p>* Minnesota</p>
<p>* NYU</p>
<p>* Northwestern</p>
<p>* Notre Dame</p>
<p>* Southern California</p>
<p>* Stanford</p>
<p>* Texas</p>
<p>* UCLA</p>
<p>* Vanderbilt</p>
<p>* Virginia</p>
<p>* Washington University</p>
<p>* Yale</p>
<p>We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.</p>
<p>We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful.  We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/announcing_the_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

