Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 84, Issue 1 (November 2008)

ARTICLES

Climate Change Confusion and the Supreme Court: The Misguided Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean Air Act

Jason Scott Johnston, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1

Corporate Misconduct and the Perfect Storm of Shareholder Litigation

Jessica Erickson, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 75

Why Protect Private Arms Possession? Nine Theories of the Second Amendment

Michael Steven Green, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 131

The Fundamental Goal of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers, Not Increasing Efficiency

John B. Kirkwood & Robert H. Lande, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 191

What is the Erie Doctrine (And What Does it Mean for the Contemporary Politics of Judicial Federalism?)

Adam N. Steinman, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 245

Opting Out of the Internet in the United States and the European [...]]]>

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 84, Issue 1 (November 2008)

Climate Change Confusion and the Supreme Court: The Misguided Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean Air Act

Jason Scott Johnston, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1

Corporate Misconduct and the Perfect Storm of Shareholder Litigation

Jessica Erickson, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 75

Why Protect Private Arms Possession? Nine Theories of the Second Amendment

Michael Steven Green, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 131

The Fundamental Goal of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers, Not Increasing Efficiency

John B. Kirkwood & Robert H. Lande, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 191

What is the Erie Doctrine (And What Does it Mean for the Contemporary Politics of Judicial Federalism?)

Adam N. Steinman, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 245

Opting Out of the Internet in the United States and the European Union: Copyright, Safe Harbors, and International Law

Hannibal Travis, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 331

The Foundations of the American Common Market

Norman R. Williams, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 409

The Root of All Evil: Expanding Criminal Liability for Providing Material Support to Terror

James J. Ward, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 471

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 5 (July 2008)

ARTICLES

The Original Meaning of an Omission: The Tenth Amendment, Popular Sovereignty, and “Expressly” Delegated Power

Kurt T. Lash, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1889

Rules of Weight

Charles L. Barzun, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1957

Liars and Terrorists and Judges, Oh My: Moral Panic and the Symbolic Politics of Appellate Review in Asylum Cases

Eric M. Fink, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2019

Doctrine Formulation and Distrust

Toby J. Heytens, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2045

NOTES

Giving HIPAA Enforcement Room to Grow: Why There Should Not (Yet) Be a Private Cause of Action

Jack Brill, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2105

Not So Fast! Scrutinizing the “Gun Jumping” Provisions of the Securities Act Under the Commercial Speech Doctrine

Edward T. Highberger, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. [...]]]>

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 5 (July 2008)

The Original Meaning of an Omission: The Tenth Amendment, Popular Sovereignty, and “Expressly” Delegated Power

Kurt T. Lash, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1889

Rules of Weight

Charles L. Barzun, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1957

Liars and Terrorists and Judges, Oh My: Moral Panic and the Symbolic Politics of Appellate Review in Asylum Cases

Eric M. Fink, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2019

Doctrine Formulation and Distrust

Toby J. Heytens, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2045

Giving HIPAA Enforcement Room to Grow: Why There Should Not (Yet) Be a Private Cause of Action

Jack Brill, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2105

Not So Fast! Scrutinizing the “Gun Jumping” Provisions of the Securities Act Under the Commercial Speech Doctrine

Edward T. Highberger, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2141

Fulfilling the Promise of Brown? What Parents Involved Means for Louisville and the Future of Race in Public Education

Meaghan Hines, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2173

The Elephant in the Classroom: A Proposed Framework for Applying Viewpoint Neutrality to Student Speech in the Secondary School Setting

Alexis Zouhary, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2227

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 4 (May 2008)

FEDERAL COURTS, PRACTICE, & PROCEDURE

SYMPOSIUM: SEPARATION OF POWERS AS A SAFEGUARD OF FEDERALISM

Forward: The Importance of Structure in Constitutional Interpretation

Antonin Scalia, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1417

Constitutional Compromise and the Supremacy Clause

Bradford R. Clark, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1421

Vetogates, Chevron, Preemption

William N. Eskridge, Jr., 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1441

Framework Legislation and Federalism

Elizabeth Garrett, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1495

Lessons from a Nondelegation Canon

John F. Manning, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1541

The Perils of Theory

Peter L. Strauss, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1567

The Separation of Powers as a Safeguard of Nationalism

Carlos Manuel Vazquez, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1601

Preemption of Federal Common Law

Ernest A. Young, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1639

The Procedural Safeguards of Federalism

Bradford [...]]]>

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 4 (May 2008)

Forward: The Importance of Structure in Constitutional Interpretation

Antonin Scalia, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1417

Constitutional Compromise and the Supremacy Clause

Bradford R. Clark, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1421

Vetogates, Chevron, Preemption

William N. Eskridge, Jr., 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1441

Framework Legislation and Federalism

Elizabeth Garrett, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1495

Lessons from a Nondelegation Canon

John F. Manning, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1541

The Perils of Theory

Peter L. Strauss, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1567

The Separation of Powers as a Safeguard of Nationalism

Carlos Manuel Vazquez, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1601

Preemption of Federal Common Law

Ernest A. Young, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1639

The Procedural Safeguards of Federalism

Bradford R. Clark, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1681

From Public Square to Market Square: Theoretical Foundations of First and Fourteenth Amendment Protection of Corporate Religious Speech

Julie Marie Baworowsky, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1713

“It Belongs in a Museum”: Appropriate Donor Incentives for Fractional Gifts of Art

Emily J. Follas, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1779

Much Ado About Twombly? A Study on the Impact of Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly on 12(b)(6) Motions

Kendall W. Hannon, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1811

Discerning the Meaning of Gonzales v. Carhart: The End of the Physician Veto and the Resulting Change in Abortion Jurisprudence

Peter M. Ladwein, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1847

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 3 (May 2008)

ARTICLES

Standing at the Crossroads: The Roberts Court in Historical Perspective

Maxwell L. Stearns, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 875

The Culpability of Felony Murder

Guyora Binder, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 965

Three Faces of Deference

Paul Horwitz, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1061

SYMPOSIUM

STARE DECISIS AND NONJUDICIAL ACTORS

Introduction

Amy Coney Barrett, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1147

Stare Decisis and the Constitution: Four Questions and Answers

Thomas Healy, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1173

Lincoln and Judicial Authority

Michael Stokes Paulsen, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1227

Polyphonic Stare Decisis: Listening to Non-Article III Actors

Kermit Roosevelt III, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1303

Legislative and Executive Stare Decisis

Mark Tushnet, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1339

NOTES

A Comparative Analysis of the Origins and Structure of Public Health Financing for HIV [...]]]>

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 3 (May 2008)

ARTICLES

Standing at the Crossroads: The Roberts Court in Historical Perspective

Maxwell L. Stearns, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 875

The Culpability of Felony Murder

Guyora Binder, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 965

Three Faces of Deference

Paul Horwitz, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1061

SYMPOSIUM

STARE DECISIS AND NONJUDICIAL ACTORS

Introduction

Amy Coney Barrett, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1147

Stare Decisis and the Constitution: Four Questions and Answers

Thomas Healy, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1173

Lincoln and Judicial Authority

Michael Stokes Paulsen, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1227

Polyphonic Stare Decisis: Listening to Non-Article III Actors

Kermit Roosevelt III, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1303

Legislative and Executive Stare Decisis

Mark Tushnet, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1339

NOTES

A Comparative Analysis of the Origins and Structure of Public Health Financing for HIV Care in the United States and England

Steven R. Keener, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1357

Damages and Damocles: The Propriety of Recoupment Orders as Remedies for Violations of the Establishment Clause

David T. Raimer, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1385

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 2 (January 2008)

ARTICLES

A Truism WIth Attitudes: The Tenth Amendment in Constitutional Context

Gary Lawson, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 469

Arbitrating Human Rights

Roger P. Alford, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 505

Misguided Fairness? Regulating Arbitration by Statute: Empirical Evidence of Declining Award Finality

Michael H. LeRoy, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 551

Debt and Democracy: Towards a Constitutional Theory of Bankruptcy

Jonathan C. Lipson, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 605

Performance Values

Sara K. Stadler, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 697

ESSAY

Locating Authority in Law, and Avoiding the Authoritarianism of “Textualism”

Patrick McKinley Brennan, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 761

NOTES

A Textual Approach to Harmonizing Sherbert and Smith on Free Exercise

Nicholas J. Nelson, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 801

Your Opinion Really Does Not Matter: How the Use Referenda in [...]]]>

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 2 (January 2008)

ARTICLES

A Truism WIth Attitudes: The Tenth Amendment in Constitutional Context

Gary Lawson, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 469

Arbitrating Human Rights

Roger P. Alford, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 505

Misguided Fairness? Regulating Arbitration by Statute: Empirical Evidence of Declining Award Finality

Michael H. LeRoy, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 551

Debt and Democracy: Towards a Constitutional Theory of Bankruptcy

Jonathan C. Lipson, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 605

Performance Values

Sara K. Stadler, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 697

ESSAY

Locating Authority in Law, and Avoiding the Authoritarianism of “Textualism”

Patrick McKinley Brennan, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 761

NOTES

A Textual Approach to Harmonizing Sherbert and Smith on Free Exercise

Nicholas J. Nelson, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 801

Your Opinion Really Does Not Matter: How the Use Referenda in Funding Public University Student Groups Violates Constitutional Free Speech Principles

Gregory B. Sanford, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 845

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 1 (November 2007)

ARTICLES

“Necessary to the Security of a Free State”

Eugene Volokh, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1

Created Facts and the Flawed Ontology of Copyright Law

Justin Hughes, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 43

Reclaiming McDonnell Douglas

Martin J. Katz, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 109

The Jurisprudence of Colliding First Amendment Interests: From the Dead End of Neutrality to the Open Road of Participation-Enhancing Review

Gregory P. Magarian, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 185

The Commandeerer in Chief

Jason Mazzone, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 265

Contract as Agreement

Lawrence M. Solan, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 353

NOTES

Can Separate Be Equal? Single-Sex Classrooms, the Constitution, and Title IX

Benjamin P. Carr, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 409

Crusading For the Helpless or Biting the Hand That Feeds? Applying [...]]]>

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 1 (November 2007)

ARTICLES

“Necessary to the Security of a Free State”

Eugene Volokh, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1

Created Facts and the Flawed Ontology of Copyright Law

Justin Hughes, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 43

Reclaiming McDonnell Douglas

Martin J. Katz, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 109

The Jurisprudence of Colliding First Amendment Interests: From the Dead End of Neutrality to the Open Road of Participation-Enhancing Review

Gregory P. Magarian, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 185

The Commandeerer in Chief

Jason Mazzone, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 265

Contract as Agreement

Lawrence M. Solan, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 353

NOTES

Can Separate Be Equal? Single-Sex Classrooms, the Constitution, and Title IX

Benjamin P. Carr, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 409

Crusading For the Helpless or Biting the Hand That Feeds? Applying Landlord-Tenant Law to Residents in Shelters

Matthew R. Hays, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 443

I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.

The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have [...]]]>

I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.

The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!

Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.

Participating law reviews thus far include:

* Boston College

* Chicago

* Columbia

* Cornell

* Duke

* Emory

* Fordham

* Georgetown

* GW

* Harvard

* Indiana

* Michigan

* Minnesota

* NYU

* Northwestern

* Notre Dame

* Southern California

* Stanford

* Texas

* UCLA

* Vanderbilt

* Virginia

* Washington University

* Yale

We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.

We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.