Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search


Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

jr_114_9780195367195_bnr

jr_114_9780195383768_bnr

advertise-here4


FC-CO(SS)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • Observer on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • Mike Rich on Negligent Corpse Mishandling

    • anon on Privacy and Tattletales

    • orly lobel on At CELS, Hoping to Blog

    • harry brooks on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • RJ on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • Michael H Schneider on Negligent Corpse Mishandling

    • flood pictures on Public opinion on same-sex marriage

    • gtownstudent on And Justache For All at GW Law

    • AF on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • RJ on Ricci and Briscoe as Disparate Impact Cases

    • Maryland Conservatarian on Ricci: Color-Blind Standards in a Race Conscious Society?

    • Daniel S. Goldberg on Negligent Corpse Mishandling

  •  

    Site Meter

Archive for the ‘Law Rev (Notre Dame)’ Category

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 84, Issue 1 (November 2008)

posted by Notre Dame Law Review

Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 84, Issue 1 (November 2008)

ARTICLES

Climate Change Confusion and the Supreme Court: The Misguided Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean Air Act

Jason Scott Johnston, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1

Corporate Misconduct and the Perfect Storm of Shareholder Litigation

Jessica Erickson, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 75

Why Protect Private Arms Possession? Nine Theories of the Second Amendment

Michael Steven Green, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 131

The Fundamental Goal of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers, Not Increasing Efficiency

John B. Kirkwood & Robert H. Lande, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 191

What is the Erie Doctrine (And What Does it Mean for the Contemporary Politics of Judicial Federalism?)

Adam N. Steinman, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 245

Opting Out of the Internet in the United States and the European Union: Copyright, Safe Harbors, and International Law

Hannibal Travis, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 331

The Foundations of the American Common Market

Norman R. Williams, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 409

NOTE

The Root of All Evil: Expanding Criminal Liability for Providing Material Support to Terror

James J. Ward, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 471

  December 29, 2008 at 10:01 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Notre Dame)  Print This Post Print This Post   No Comments

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 5 (July 2008)

posted by Notre Dame Law Review

Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 5 (July 2008)

ARTICLES

The Original Meaning of an Omission: The Tenth Amendment, Popular Sovereignty, and “Expressly” Delegated Power

Kurt T. Lash, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1889

Rules of Weight

Charles L. Barzun, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1957

Liars and Terrorists and Judges, Oh My: Moral Panic and the Symbolic Politics of Appellate Review in Asylum Cases

Eric M. Fink, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2019

Doctrine Formulation and Distrust

Toby J. Heytens, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2045

NOTES

Giving HIPAA Enforcement Room to Grow: Why There Should Not (Yet) Be a Private Cause of Action

Jack Brill, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2105

Not So Fast! Scrutinizing the “Gun Jumping” Provisions of the Securities Act Under the Commercial Speech Doctrine

Edward T. Highberger, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2141

Fulfilling the Promise of Brown? What Parents Involved Means for Louisville and the Future of Race in Public Education

Meaghan Hines, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2173

The Elephant in the Classroom: A Proposed Framework for Applying Viewpoint Neutrality to Student Speech in the Secondary School Setting

Alexis Zouhary, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2227

  December 29, 2008 at 9:35 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Notre Dame)  Print This Post Print This Post   No Comments

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 4 (May 2008)

posted by Notre Dame Law Review

Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 4 (May 2008)

FEDERAL COURTS, PRACTICE, & PROCEDURE

SYMPOSIUM: SEPARATION OF POWERS AS A SAFEGUARD OF FEDERALISM

Forward: The Importance of Structure in Constitutional Interpretation

Antonin Scalia, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1417

Constitutional Compromise and the Supremacy Clause

Bradford R. Clark, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1421

Vetogates, Chevron, Preemption

William N. Eskridge, Jr., 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1441

Framework Legislation and Federalism

Elizabeth Garrett, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1495

Lessons from a Nondelegation Canon

John F. Manning, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1541

The Perils of Theory

Peter L. Strauss, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1567

The Separation of Powers as a Safeguard of Nationalism

Carlos Manuel Vazquez, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1601

Preemption of Federal Common Law

Ernest A. Young, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1639

The Procedural Safeguards of Federalism

Bradford R. Clark, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1681

NOTES

From Public Square to Market Square: Theoretical Foundations of First and Fourteenth Amendment Protection of Corporate Religious Speech

Julie Marie Baworowsky, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1713

“It Belongs in a Museum”: Appropriate Donor Incentives for Fractional Gifts of Art

Emily J. Follas, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1779

Much Ado About Twombly? A Study on the Impact of Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly on 12(b)(6) Motions

Kendall W. Hannon, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1811

Discerning the Meaning of Gonzales v. Carhart: The End of the Physician Veto and the Resulting Change in Abortion Jurisprudence

Peter M. Ladwein, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1847

  December 29, 2008 at 9:05 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Notre Dame)  Print This Post Print This Post   One Comment

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 3 (May 2008)

posted by Notre Dame Law Review

Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 3 (May 2008)

ARTICLES

Standing at the Crossroads: The Roberts Court in Historical Perspective

Maxwell L. Stearns, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 875

The Culpability of Felony Murder

Guyora Binder, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 965

Three Faces of Deference

Paul Horwitz, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1061

SYMPOSIUM

STARE DECISIS AND NONJUDICIAL ACTORS

Introduction

Amy Coney Barrett, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1147

Stare Decisis and the Constitution: Four Questions and Answers

Thomas Healy, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1173

Lincoln and Judicial Authority

Michael Stokes Paulsen, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1227

Polyphonic Stare Decisis: Listening to Non-Article III Actors

Kermit Roosevelt III, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1303

Legislative and Executive Stare Decisis

Mark Tushnet, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1339

NOTES

A Comparative Analysis of the Origins and Structure of Public Health Financing for HIV Care in the United States and England

Steven R. Keener, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1357

Damages and Damocles: The Propriety of Recoupment Orders as Remedies for Violations of the Establishment Clause

David T. Raimer, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1385

  July 6, 2008 at 9:12 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Notre Dame)  Print This Post Print This Post   No Comments

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 2 (January 2008)

posted by Notre Dame Law Review

Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 2 (January 2008)

ARTICLES

A Truism WIth Attitudes: The Tenth Amendment in Constitutional Context

Gary Lawson, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 469

Arbitrating Human Rights

Roger P. Alford, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 505

Misguided Fairness? Regulating Arbitration by Statute: Empirical Evidence of Declining Award Finality

Michael H. LeRoy, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 551

Debt and Democracy: Towards a Constitutional Theory of Bankruptcy

Jonathan C. Lipson, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 605

Performance Values

Sara K. Stadler, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 697

ESSAY

Locating Authority in Law, and Avoiding the Authoritarianism of “Textualism”

Patrick McKinley Brennan, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 761

NOTES

A Textual Approach to Harmonizing Sherbert and Smith on Free Exercise

Nicholas J. Nelson, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 801

Your Opinion Really Does Not Matter: How the Use Referenda in Funding Public University Student Groups Violates Constitutional Free Speech Principles

Gregory B. Sanford, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 845

  April 10, 2008 at 7:01 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Notre Dame), Law Rev Contents  Print This Post Print This Post   One Comment

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 1 (November 2007)

posted by Notre Dame Law Review

Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg

Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 1 (November 2007)

ARTICLES

“Necessary to the Security of a Free State”

Eugene Volokh, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1

Created Facts and the Flawed Ontology of Copyright Law

Justin Hughes, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 43

Reclaiming McDonnell Douglas

Martin J. Katz, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 109

The Jurisprudence of Colliding First Amendment Interests: From the Dead End of Neutrality to the Open Road of Participation-Enhancing Review

Gregory P. Magarian, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 185

The Commandeerer in Chief

Jason Mazzone, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 265

Contract as Agreement

Lawrence M. Solan, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 353

NOTES

Can Separate Be Equal? Single-Sex Classrooms, the Constitution, and Title IX

Benjamin P. Carr, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 409

Crusading For the Helpless or Biting the Hand That Feeds? Applying Landlord-Tenant Law to Residents in Shelters

Matthew R. Hays, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 443

  March 19, 2008 at 6:24 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Notre Dame), Law Rev Contents  Print This Post Print This Post   One Comment

Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project

posted by Daniel Solove

table-of-contents1.jpg

I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.

The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!

Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.

Participating law reviews thus far include:

* Boston College

* Chicago

* Columbia

* Cornell

* Duke

* Emory

* Fordham

* Georgetown

* GW

* Harvard

* Indiana

* Michigan

* Minnesota

* NYU

* Northwestern

* Notre Dame

* Southern California

* Stanford

* Texas

* UCLA

* Vanderbilt

* Virginia

* Washington University

* Yale

We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.

We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.

  November 13, 2007 at 12:10 am   Posted in: Administrative Announcements, Law Rev (Boston College), Law Rev (Chicago), Law Rev (Columbia), Law Rev (Cornell), Law Rev (Duke), Law Rev (Emory), Law Rev (Fordham), Law Rev (GW), Law Rev (Georgetown), Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev (Indiana), Law Rev (Michigan), Law Rev (Minnesota), Law Rev (NYU), Law Rev (Northwestern), Law Rev (Notre Dame), Law Rev (S Cal), Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev (Texas), Law Rev (UCLA), Law Rev (Vanderbilt), Law Rev (Virginia), Law Rev (Yale), Law Rev Contents  Print This Post Print This Post   7 Comments




Authors

Daniel J. Solove

Website
Understanding Privacy

Kaimipono Wenger

Website
SSRN Page

Dave Hoffman

Website
SSRN Page

Nate Oman

Website
SSRN Page

Frank Pasquale

Website
SSRN Page

Deven Desai

Website
SSRN Page

Danielle Citron

Website
SSRN Page

Lawrence Cunningham

Website
SSRN Page

Sarah Waldeck

Website
SSRN Page

Jaya Ramji-Nogales

Website
SSRN Page

Solangel Maldonado

Website
SSRN Page

Gerard Magliocca

Website
SSRN Page


Guests

Rachel Godsil
Alex Kreit
Anita Krishnakumar
Matthew Sag
Michael Zimmer






Previous Guests

Michael Abramowicz
Michelle Adams
Robert Ahdieh
Michelle Anderson
Laura Appleman
Ann Bartow
Francesca Bignami
Jeremy Blumenthal
Kathleen Boozang
Bruce Boyden
Donald Braman
Al Brophy
Neil H. Buchanan
Bill Burke-White
Scott Burris
Paul Butler
Naomi Cahn
Anupam Chander
Miriam Cherry
Jack Chin
Jennifer Collins
Allison Danner
Brannon Denning
Deven Desai
Mike Dimino
Mark Edwards
David Fagundes
Christine Haight Farley
Kim Ferzan
Dan Filler
Michael Froomkin
Amanda Frost
Timothy Glynn
Rachel Godsil
Eric Goldman
David Gray
Craig Green
Tristin Green
Jeffrey Harrison
Erica Hashimoto
Carissa Hessick
Laura Heymann
Robert Hillman
Christine Hurt
Darian Ibrahim
John Ip
Kevin Johnson
Dan Kahan
Brian Kalt
Sam Kamin
Michael Kang
Chimène Keitner
Orin Kerr
Nancy Kim
Heidi Kitrosser
Adam Kolber
Russell Korobkin
Anita S. Krishnakumar
Susan Kuo
Greg Lastowka
Sarah Lawsky
Erik Lillquist
Jeff Lipshaw
Jonathan Lipson
Jacqueline Lipton
Joseph Liu
Michael Madison
Solangel Maldonado
Jason Mazzone
Linda McClain
William McGeveran
Salil Mehra
Carrie Menkel-Meadow
Max Minzner
Scott Moss
Eric Muller
Jaya Ramji-Nogales
Helen Norton
Elizabeth Nowicki
Paul Ohm
Michael O'Shea
David Opderback
Kristen Osenga
Rafael Pardo
Marcy Peek
Eduardo Peñalver
Robert Percival
David Post
Shruti Rana
Geoffrey Rapp
Neil Richards
Lori Ringhand
Alice Ristroph
Susan Scafidi
Paul Secunda
Jonathan Siegel
Jessica Silbey
Peter Smith
Charles Sullivan
Rick Swedloff
Steph Tai
Andrew Taslitz
Robert Tsai
Jenia Turner
Steve Vladeck
Sarah Waldeck
Melissa Waters
Alfred Yen
David Zaring
Timothy Zick
Spencer Weber Waller
Howard Wasserman
Frank Wu
Corey Yung
Jonathan Zittrain

Blogroll

Above the Law
ACS Blog
Althouse
Balkinization
Becker-Posner Blog
BlackProf
BoingBoing
Chicago Law Faculty Blog
Conglomerate
CrimLaw
Crime & Federalism
CrimProf Blog
Crooked Timber
Discourse.net
Dorf on Law
Election Law
Emergent Chaos
The Faculty Lounge
Feminist Law Profs
43(B)log
Freakonomics Blog
Freedom to Tinker
Google Blogoscoped
How Appealing
Ideoblog
Info/Law
Instapundit.com
Juris Novus
Jurisdynamics
Law and Humanities Blog
Law and Letters
Law Librarian Blog
Legal Profession Blog
Legal Theory Blog
Legal Times Blog
Leiter Reports
Brian Leiter's Law School Reports
Lessig Blog
Madisonian Theory
Media Law Blog
Mirror of Justice
The Moderate Voice
National Security Advisors
Opinio Juris
Point of Law
PrawfsBlawg
ProfessorBainbridge.com
Property Prof Blog
Red Tape Chronicles
The Right Coast
Schneier on Security
SCOTUSBlog
Security Dilemmas
Sentencing Law and Policy
Simple Justice
Sivacracy.net
The Situationist
Susan Crawford
TalkLeft
Talking Points Memo
TaxProf Blog
Tech & Marketing Law
Truth on the Market
Volokh Conspiracy
WorkPlace Prof Blog
WSJ Law Blog
Wonkette
The Yin Blog


© Concurring Opinions

Powered by WordPress