Home | About | RSS Feed | Contact and Publicity Guidelines | Comment Policy the Law, the Universe, and Everything 

Search


Concurring Opinions is a
general-interest legal blog
operated by Concurring
Opinions LLC, a Pennsylvania
Limited Liability Corporation.

jr_114_9780195367195_bnr

jr_114_9780195383768_bnr

advertise-here4


FC-CO(SS)

Our Podcast

Subscribe to Law Talk

law-rev-contents2.jpg


  • Posts by Author

  • Categories

  • Archives


  • Recent Comments

    • Mike Zimmer on From the other side at AALS . . .

    • Mike Zimmer on The Employer’s Strategy in Gross v. FBL Financials

    • Mike Zimmer on Drafting the 28th Amendment

    • M.G.M on Drafting the 28th Amendment

    • A.J. Sutter on Lawyers: Don’t Trade on Inside Information!

    • No Load Funds on Consumer Financial Product Safety?

    • grad student on Princeton and the Behavioral Revolution

    • Anon321 on The Passive Voice in Statutory Interpretation

    • Steven Kaminshine on The Employer’s Strategy in Gross v. FBL Financials

    • Alex Kreit on Politicians: Have you talked to your constituents about drug policy?

    • Alex Kreit on Election Night 2009

    • mikeb302000 on Election Night 2009

    • Neal Goldfarb on The Passive Voice in Statutory Interpretation

    • Orin Kerr on Politicians: Have you talked to your constituents about drug policy?

    • MYarnell on Curricular Reform Revisited

  •  

    Site Meter

Archive for the ‘Law Rev (Harvard)’ Category

Harvard Law Review, 122:6 (April 2009)

posted by Harvard Law Review

HLR-logo2a.bmp

Vol. 122 · April 2009 · No. 6

ARTICLES
FORESEEABILITY AND

COPYRIGHT INCENTIVES

Shyamkrishna Balganesh

ANTI-INQUISITORIALISM

David Alan Sklansky
NOTES
Retreat: The Supreme Court and the New Police
Go Directly to Jail: White Collar Sentencing After the Sarbanes-Oxley Act
Church, Choice, and Charters: A New Wrinkle for Public Education?
RECENT CASES

Third Circuit Holds University Sexual Harassment Policy
Unconstitutional.
— DeJohn v. Temple University, 537 F.3d 301 (3d Cir. 2008).
Wisconsin Supreme Court Applies Sexual Assault Statute to Attempted
Sexual Intercourse with a Corpse. — State v. Grunke, 752 N.W.2d 769 (Wis. 2008).
RECENT PUBLICATIONS

Full

Text

  April 22, 2009 at 3:43 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev Contents  Print This Post Print This Post   Comments Closed

Harvard Law Review, 122:5 (March 2009)

posted by Harvard Law Review

HLR-logo2a.bmp

Vol. 122 · March 2009 · No. 5

IN

MEMORIAM: OLIVER OLDMAN

William P. Alford         Richard M. Bird

Michael J. McIntyre

Minoru Nakazato and J. Mark Ramseyer     Richard Pomp

Eric M. Zolt

ARTICLES
INTIMATE DISCRIMINATION: THE STATE’S ROLE IN THE ACCIDENTS OF SEX AND LOVE
Elizabeth F. Emens
ADJUSTING ALIENABILITY Lee Anne Fennell
NOTES
Political Gerrymandering 2000-2008: “A Self-Limiting Enterprise”?
Designing the Public Domain
The Rule of Law in the Marketplace of Ideas:
Pledges or Promises by Candidates for Judicial Election
RECENT CASES

Seventh Circuit Allows Employee Terminated for Undergoing
In Vitro Fertilization To Bring Sex Discrimination Claim.
— Hall v. Nalco Co., 534 F.3d 644 (7th Cir. 2008).
D.C. Circuit Again Invalidates FEC Regulations Implementing
Bipartisan Campaign Reform Act of 2002. — Shays v. FEC,
528 F.3d 914 (D.C. Cir. 2008).
Second Circuit Suggests that Statutory Interpretations in Agency Manuals
Are Ineligible for Chevron Deference.
— Estate of Landers v. Leavitt, 545 F.3d 98 (2d Cir. 2008).
California Supreme Court Declares Prohibition of Same-Sex Marriages
Unconstitutional.— In re Marriage Cases, 183 P.3d 384 (Cal. 2008).
RECENT PUBLICATIONS

Full

Text

  March 23, 2009 at 3:10 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev Contents  Print This Post Print This Post   Comments Closed

Harvard Law Review, 122:4 (February 2009)

posted by Harvard Law Review

HLR-logo2a.bmp

Vol. 122 · February 2009 · No. 4

"margin-left: auto; margin-right: auto;">

"-1">ARTICLES

"http://www.harvardlawreview.org/issues/122/feb09/sunstein.shtml"> 200 OK

OK

The server encountered an internal error or misconfiguration and was unable to complete your request.

Please contact the server administrator, support@supportwebsite.com and inform them of the time the error occurred, and anything you might have done that may have caused the error.

More information about this error may be available in the server error log.


Apache/1.3.33 Server at www.concurringopinions.com Port 80