Archive for the ‘Law Rev (Harvard)’ Category
Harvard Law Review, 123:4 (2010)
posted by Harvard Law Review
Volume 123 · February 2010 · Number 4
ARTICLE
Intellectual Property Law and the Sumptuary Code
Barton Beebe
BOOK REVIEW
The Possibilities and Limitations of Privatization
Edward Rubin
NOTES
Prosecutorial Power and the Legitimacy of the Military Justice System
Badging: Section 230 Immunity in a Web 2.0 World
Making Ballot Initiatives Work: Some Assembly Required
RECENT PUBLICATIONS
Recent Publications
March 2, 2010 at 10:38 am
Posted in: Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
Comments Closed
Harvard Law Review, 123:3 (2010)
posted by Harvard Law Review
Volume 123 · January 2010 · Number 3
ARTICLES
Complementary Constraints: Separation of Powers, Rational Voting, and Constitutional Design
Jide O. Nzelibe and Matthew C. Stephenson
Enabling Employee Choice: A Structural Approach to the Rules of Union Organizing
Benjamin I. Sachs
NOTE
Central Bank and Intellectual Property
January 22, 2010 at 3:05 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments
Harvard Law Review, 123:2 (2009)
posted by Harvard Law Review
Volume 123 · December 2009 · Number 2
ARTICLES
Tying, Bundled Discounts, and the Death of the Single Monopoly Profit Theory
Einer Elhauge
Mobile Capital, Local Economic Regulation, and the Democratic City
Richard C. Schragger
NOTE
Textualism as Fair Notice
RECENT PUBLICATIONS
Recent Publications
December 20, 2009 at 2:35 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments
Harvard Law Review, 123:1 (2009)
posted by Harvard Law Review
Volume 123 · November 2009 · Number 1
The Supreme Court 2008 Term
FOREWORD
System Effects and the Constitution
Adrian Vermeule
COMMENTS
Caperton v. A.T. Massey Coal Co.: Due Process Limitations on the Appearance of Judicial Bias
Electing Judges, Judging Elections, and the Lessons of Caperton
Pamela S. Karlan
What Everybody Knows and What Too Few Accept
Lawrence Lessig
Relinquished Responsibilities
Penny J. White
LEADING CASES
CRIMINAL LAW AND PROCEDURE
Fourth Amendment — Exclusionary Rule: Herring v. United States.
Fourth Amendment — Search by School Officials: Safford Unified School District No. 1 v. Redding.
Fourth Amendment — Search Incident to Arrest: Arizona v. Gant.
Sixth Amendment — Right to Counsel — Interrogation Without Counsel Present: Montejo v. Louisiana.
Sixth Amendment — Sentencing — Factfinding in Sentencing for Multiple Offenses: Oregon v. Ice.
DUE PROCESS
Peremptory Challenges — Harmless Error Doctrine: Rivera v. Illinois.
Postconviction Access to DNA Evidence: District Attorney’s Office v. Osborne.
FREEDOM OF SPEECH AND EXPRESSION
Government Speech: Pleasant Grove City v. Summum.
Government Subsidies of Political Speech: Ysursa v. Pocatello Education Ass’n.
CIVIL PROCEDURE
Pleading Standards: Ashcroft v. Iqbal.
FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW
Preemption of State Common Law Claims: Wyeth v. Levine.
QUALIFIED IMMUNITY
Order of Analysis: Pearson v. Callahan.
CIVIL RIGHTS ACT, TITLE VII
Compliance Efforts: Ricci v. DeStefano.
FOREIGN SOVEREIGN IMMUNITIES ACT
Iraqi Sovereign Immunity: Republic of Iraq v. Beaty.
HAWAII APOLOGY RESOLUTION
Alienation of Hawaiian Land: Hawaii v. Office of Hawaiian Affairs.
IDENTITY THEFT
Mens Rea Requirement: Flores-Figueroa v. United States.
NATIONAL BANK ACT
Preemption of State Law Enforcement: Cuomo v. Clearing House Ass’n.
NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS ACT
Waiver of Right to a Federal Forum: 14 Penn Plaza LLC v. Pyett.
REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE ACTION
Clean Water Act — Judicial Review of Cost-Benefit Analysis: Entergy Corp. v. Riverkeeper, Inc.
Communications Act — Scope of Arbitrary and Capricious Review: FCC v. Fox Television Stations, Inc.
VOTING RIGHTS ACT
Preclearance: Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. One v. Holder.
Vote Dilution: Bartlett v. Strickland.
STATISTICS
The Statistics
November 20, 2009 at 1:42 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
Comments Closed
Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project
posted by Daniel Solove
I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.
The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!
Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.
Participating law reviews thus far include:
* Boston College
* Chicago
* Columbia
* Cornell
* Duke
* Emory
* Fordham
* Georgetown
* GW
* Harvard
* Indiana
* Michigan
* Minnesota
* NYU
* Northwestern
* Notre Dame
* Southern California
* Stanford
* Texas
* UCLA
* Vanderbilt
* Virginia
* Washington University
* Yale
We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.
We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.
November 13, 2007 at 12:10 am
Posted in: Administrative Announcements, Law Rev (Boston College), Law Rev (Chicago), Law Rev (Columbia), Law Rev (Cornell), Law Rev (Duke), Law Rev (Emory), Law Rev (Fordham), Law Rev (GW), Law Rev (Georgetown), Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev (Indiana), Law Rev (Michigan), Law Rev (Minnesota), Law Rev (NYU), Law Rev (Northwestern), Law Rev (Notre Dame), Law Rev (S Cal), Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev (Texas), Law Rev (UCLA), Law Rev (Vanderbilt), Law Rev (Virginia), Law Rev (Yale), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
7 Comments
Announcing the Law Review Forum Project
posted by Daniel Solove
I am very pleased to announce a new project here at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Forum Project. We will be hosting online forums for several law reviews. Increasingly, law reviews are creating online forums as companions to their regular law review issues. These forums contain very short response pieces, essays, debates, and other works that attempt to bridge the gap between regular legal scholarship and the blogosphere.
Journals seeking to create their own online forum face two daunting challenges. First, they must create and actively maintain a web presence. Second, they must find ways to attract readers, which is difficult in an age where so many blogs and other websites exist. A wide readership for a website depends upon having daily content. Law review forums produce content sporadically throughout the year at intervals that are not regular enough to attract a significant readership.
Therefore, we have invited a number of law reviews to participate in a partnership with our blog. Throughout the year, each law review will periodically post forum essays here at Concurring Opinions. We are not requiring an exclusive license, so participating law reviews can also cross-post at their own websites.
We see this as a mutually-beneficial arrangement. We can bring great content to our blog, and law reviews can reach our significant audience without the pressures of having to build and maintain an online readership or of having to produce content with regularity.
Law reviews currently with and without existing forums will be participating. Thus far, the following law reviews have agreed to participate:
* Harvard Law Review
* Virginia Law Review
* Michigan Law Review
* University of Pennsylvania Law Review
* Northwestern Law Review
* UCLA Law Review
* George Washington Law Review
In the near future, we hope to be expanding the list of participating law reviews.
April 24, 2007 at 1:04 am
Posted in: Administrative Announcements, Law Rev (GW), Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev (Michigan), Law Rev (Northwestern), Law Rev (Penn), Law Rev (UCLA), Law Rev (Virginia), Law Rev Forum, Law School (Law Reviews), Law School (Scholarship)
Print This Post
4 Comments
