Site Meter

Category: Law Rev (GW)

1

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:4 (June 2010)

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:4 (June 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles

Christopher S. Yoo, Free Speech and the Myth of the Internet as an Unintermediated Experience, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 697 (2010)

Steve P. Calandrillo, Penalizing Punitive Damages: Why the Supreme Court Needs a Lesson in Law and Economics, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 774 (2010)

Essay

Danielle Keats Citron, Fulfilling Government 2.0′s Promise with Robust Privacy Protections, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 822 (2010)

Book Review

Chad M. Oldfather, Oral History and the Study of the Judiciary, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 846 (2010) 

Notes

Joshua P. Borden, Derailing Penn Central: A Post-Lingle, Cost-Basis Approach to Regulatory Takings, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 870 (2010)

Alex Brazier, The People on the Bus Get Searched and Seized: Why Police Conduct in Suspicionless Bus Sweeps Should Be Circumscribed, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 908 (2010)

Daniel George, That Is What We Said, but This Is What We Meant: Putting the Meaning Back into Use-of-Force Legislation, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 942 (2010)

0

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:3 (April 2010)

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:3 (April 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

THE FEDERAL  CIRCUIT:  THE NATIONAL APPELLATE COURT CELEBRATION AND INTROSPECTIVE SYMPOSIUM

The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch, Keynote Address, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 513 (2010)

John F. Duffy, The Federal Circuit in the Shadow of the Solicitor General, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 518 (2010)

John M. Golden, The Federal Circuit and the D.C. Circuit: Comparative Trials of Two Semi-Specialized Courts, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 553 (2010)

Paul D. Carrington & Paulina Orchard, The Federal Circuit: A Model for Reform?, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 575 (2010)

Ralph C. Nash, Jr., The Government Contract Decisions of the Federal Court, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 586 (2010)

Notes

Anthony Bernard, Holding Corporations Liable in the United States for Aiding and Abetting Human Rights Violations Abroad: A Statutory Solution, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 615 (2010)

Timothy Frey, Your Insurance Does Not Cover That: Disability-Based Discrimination Where It Hurts the Most, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 636 (2010)

Andrew Frohlich, Volunteering to Deceive: Criminalizing Citizen-Group Espionage, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 668 (2010)

0

The George Washington Law Review – Arguendo (March 2010)

The George Washington Law Review - Arguendo (March 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Essay

Danielle Keats Citron, Fulfilling Government 2.0′s Promise with Robust Privacy Protections, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo (March 2010).

Book Review

Chad M. Oldfather,  Oral History and the Study of the Judiciary, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo (March 2010).

* Note: the above Essay and Book Review have now been published in 78:4, which can be found here.

0

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:2 (February 2010)

GWLRbannerTOC.gif

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:2 (February 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles

Austen L. Parrish, Duplicative Foreign Litigation, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 237 (2010)

Nathan Alexander Sales, Share and Share Alike: Intelligence Agencies and Information Sharing, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 279 (2010)

Essay

A. Benjamin Spencer, The Restrictive Ethos in Civil Procedure, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 353 (2010)

Notes

Bruce Corey, At Writ’s End: Using the Law of Nations to Decide the Extraterritorial Reach of the Suspension Clause, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 374 (2010)

Allison S. Owen, Leaving Behind a Good Idea: How No Child Left Behind Fails to Incorporate the Individualized Spirit of the IDEA, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 405 (2010)

Richard F. Shordt, Not Registered to Vote? Sign This, Mail It, and Go Hire a Lawyer, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 438 (2010)

Mark Taticchi, Redefining Possessory Interests: Perfect Copies of Information as Fourth Amendment Seizures, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 476 (2010)

2

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:1 (November 2009)

GWLRbannerTOC.gif

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:1 (November 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

A Tribute to Jack H. Friedenthal: Fifty Years in Legal Education

The George Washington Law Review, Dedication, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev.  i (2009)

The Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg, In Celebration of Jack Friedenthal, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1 (2009)

Frederick M. Lawrence, Jack Friedenthal: A Scholar, a Teacher, and a Dean’s Dean, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 3 (2009)

Helen Hershkoff and Arthur R. Miller, Celebrating Jack H. Friedenthal: The Views of Two Co-authors, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 9 (2009)

Mary Kay Kane, Pretrial Procedural Reform and Jack Friedenthal, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 30 (2009)

Articles

Justin R. Long, Against Certification, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 114 (2009)

Notes

Nikhel Sus, Yes We Can . . . Fire You For Sending Political E-mails: A Proposal to Update the Hatch Act for the Twenty-First Century, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 171 (2009)

Mike Wagner, Warrantless Wiretapping, Retroactive Immunity, and the Fifth Amendment, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 204 (2009)

_____________________________________

The George Washington Law Review is pleased to announce the launch of its new website and online forum, Arguendo (www.gwlawreview.org). Arguendo will publish original articles and essays directly to the web, giving contributing authors an opportunity to contribute to scholarly discourse much sooner than with traditional (print) legal scholarship. In general, such pieces should range from 5,000 – 10,000 words (including footnotes), though exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis. The Law Review will subsequently publish all non-student (and select student) pieces exceeding 5,000 words in a cumulative print issue at the end of the year. This will allow contributing authors both to have their work published more quickly than is standard for legal periodicals and to receive a traditional citation, e.g., 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. ___ (2009), for their piece.

Submissions for Arguendo will be accepted on a rolling basis. If interested in publishing on Arguendo, please e-mail gwlrarguendo@law.gwu.edu with a copy of your essay and curriculum vitae attached. Please also e-mail that address with any questions about Arguendo or our publication process.

0

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:5/6 (September 2009)

GWLRbannerTOC.gif

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:5/6 (September 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

What Does our Legal System Owe Future Generations? New Analysis of Intergenerational Justice for a New Century

Philosophical Perspectives on Intergenerational Justice: Who, What, How, and Why?

Robert Hockett, Justice in Time, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1135 (2009) [PDF]

Ori J. Herstein, The Identity and (Legal) Rights of Future Generations, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1173 (2009) [PDF]

David DeGrazia, Just(ice) in Time for Future Generations: A Response to Hockett and Herstein , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1216 (2009) [PDF]

Government Finances Today and Economic Prosperity Tomorrow

Neil H. Buchanan, What Do We Owe Future Generations?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1237 (2009) [PDF]

Daniel Shaviro, The Long-Term U.S. Fiscal Gap: Is the Main Problem Generational Inequity?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1298 (2009) [PDF]

Lawrence Zelenak, Does Intergenerational Justice Require Rising Standards of Living?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1358 (2009) [PDF]

Nancy J. Altman, Social Security and Intergenerational Justice, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1383 (2009) [PDF]

Neil H. Buchanan, Four out of Four Panelists Agree: U.S. Fiscal Policy Does Not Cheat Future Generations, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1402 (2009) [PDF]

Does the Earth Belong to the Living? Property and Environmental Law Perspectives on the Rights of Future Generations

Jamison E. Colburn, Splitting the Atom of Property: Rights Experimentalism as Obligation to Future Generations, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1411 (2009) [PDF]

Matthew D. Adler, Future Generations: A Prioritarian View, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1478 (2009) [PDF]

William W. Buzbee, Preemption Hard Look Review, Regulatory Interaction, and the Quest for Stewardship and Intergenerational Equity , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1521 (2009) [PDF]

The Impact of Reproductive Rights Today on the Composition of Future Generations

Sherry F. Colb, To Whom Do We Refer When We Speak of Obligations to “Future Generations”? Reproductive Rights and the Intergenerational Community, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1521 (2009) [PDF]

Ann Shalleck, Offspring and Bodies: Dependency and Vulnerability in the Constitutional Jurisprudence of Reproductive Rights, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1620 (2009) [PDF]

The Living Constitution and Future Generations

Michael C. Dorf, The Aspirational Constitution, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1631 (2009) [PDF]

0

The George Washington Law Review

GWLRbannerTOC.gif

The George Washington Law Review will soon launch launch its new web site and online forum, Arguendo. Arguendo will publish original articles and essays directly to the web, giving contributing authors an opportunity to contribute to scholarly discourse much sooner than with traditional (print) legal scholarship. In general, such pieces should range from 5,000 – 10,000 words (including footnotes), though exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis. The Law Review will subsequently publish all non-student (and select student) pieces exceeding 5,000 words in a cumulative print issue at the end of the year. This will allow contributing authors both to have their work published more quickly than is standard for legal periodicals and to receive a traditional citation, e.g., 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. ___ (2009), for their piece.

We are currently accepting submissions for Arguendo and will continue doing so on a rolling basis. If interested in publishing on Arguendo, please e-mail gwlrarguendo@law.gwu.edu with a copy of your essay and curriculum vitae attached. Please also e-mail that address with any questions about Arguendo or our publication process.

0

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:4 (June 2009)

GWLRbannerTOC.gif

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:4 (June 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Annual Review of Administrative Law
Foreword

Elizabeth Magill, Agency Self-Regulation, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 859 (2009) [PDF]

Essay

John F. Duffy, Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 904 (2009) [PDF]

Report

Cary Coglianese, Heather Kilmartin, and Evan Mendelson, Transparency and Public Participation in the Federal Rulemaking Process: Recommendations for the New Administration , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 924 (2009) [PDF]

Book Review

Peter H. Schuck, Is a Competent Federal Government Becoming Oxymoronic?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 973 (2009) [PDF]

Administrative Law Essays

Christopher Carlberg, Early to Bed for Federal Regulations: A New Attempt to Avoid “Midnight Regulations” and Its Effect on Political Accountability, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 992 (2009) [PDF]

Andrew Croner, Morrison, Edmond, and the Power of Appointments, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1002 (2009) [PDF]

Shaina N. Elias, Challenges to Inclusion on the “No-Fly List” Should Fly in District Court: Considering the Jurisdictional Implications of Administrative Agency Structure, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1015 (2009) [PDF]

Ben Everard, Early Termination Fees: Fair Game or Federally Preempted?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1033 (2009) [PDF]

Elliot Golding, Medicare Part D: Rights Without Remedies, Bars to Relief, and Miles of Red Tape, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1044 (2009) [PDF]

Julian Helisek, The Fault, Dear PCAOB, Lies Not in the Appointments Clause, but in the Removal Power, That You Are Unconstitutional, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1063 (2009) [PDF]

Elliott Karr, Independent Litigation Authority and Calls for the View of the Solicitor General , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1080 (2009) [PDF]

Megan Keane, Patent Reexamination and the Seventh Amendment, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1101 (2009) [PDF]

Stephen Satterfield, A New Interpretation, and Absurd Result: How HHS Is Short-Changing Children with Severe Mental Illness , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1114 (2009) [PDF]

0

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:3 (April 2009)

GWLRbannerTOC.gif

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:3 (April 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles

Matthew I. Hall, The Partially Prudential Doctrine of Mootness, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 562 (2009) [PDF]

Anthony J. Colangelo, “De facto Sovereignty”: Boumediene and Beyond, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 623 (2009) [PDF]

Colloquy
Beyond the ‘Races’: Re-examining the Relationship Between Federalism and Corporate Governance

William W. Bratton, Unentrapped, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 677 (2009) [PDF]

Lawrence A. Cunningham, The New Federal Corporation Law?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 685 (2009) [PDF]

M. Todd Henderson, Two Visions of Corporate Law, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 708 (2009) [PDF]

Robert B. Ahdieh, The (Misunderstood) Genius of American Corporate Law, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 730 (2009) [PDF]

Notes

Christopher Carlberg, Cooperative Noncooperation: A Proposal for an Effective Uniform Noncooperation Immigration Policy for Local Governments, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 730 (2009) [PDF]

Andrew Croner, A Snake in the Grass?: Section 798 of the Espionage Act and Its Constitutionality as Applied to the Press, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 766 (2009) [PDF]

Evan Mayor, The “Bong Hits” Case and Viewpoint Discrimination: A State Law Answer to Protecting Unpopular Student Viewpoints, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 799 (2009) [PDF]

Christopher Meeks, The Pollution Delusion: A Proposal for a Uniform Interpretation of Pollution in General Liability Absolute Pollution Exclusions, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 824 (2009) [PDF]

0

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:2 (February 2009)

GWLRbannerTOC.gif

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:2 (February 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles:

Robert B. Ahdieh, Trapped in a Metaphor: The Limited Implications of Federalism for Corporate Governance, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 255 (2009) [PDF]

Chad M. Oldfather, Universal De Novo Review, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 308 (2009) [PDF]

Todd S. Aagaard, Factual Premises of Statutory Interpretation in Agency Review Cases, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 366 (2009) [PDF]

Notes:

Rachel Frankel, Sharks and Minnows: Using Temporary Alien Deportation Immunity to Catch the Big Fish, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 431 (2009) [PDF]

Rita Glasionov, In Furtherance of Transparency and Litigants’ Rights: Reforming the State Secrets Privilege, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 458 (2009) [PDF]

Megha Shah, Grassroots Enforcement of EISA: The Need for a Citizen Suit Provision in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 488 (2009) [PDF]

Ross L. Weiner, The Office of Legal Counsel and Torture: The Law as Both a Sword and Shield, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 524 (2009) [PDF]