Concurring Opinions » Law Rev (GW)

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 79:2 (February 2011)

George Washington Law Review — Tue, 01 Mar 2011 01:50:36 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 79:2 (February 2011)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Aggregate Litigation: Critical Perspectives

Foreword

Roger H. Trangsrud, Aggregate Litigation Reconsidered, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 293 (2011)

Keynote

Deborah R. Hensler, The Future of Mass Litigation: Global Class Actions and Third-Party Litigation Funding, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 306 (2011)

Issues in the Certification of Class Actions

Richard Marcus, Reviving Judicial Gatekeeping of Aggregation: Scrutinizing the Merits on Class Certification, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 324 (2011)

Luke McCloud & David Rosenberg, A Solution to the Choice of Law Problem of Differing State Laws in Class Actions: Average Law, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 374 (2011)

Patrick Woolley, The Jurisdictional Nature of Adequate Representation in Class Litigation, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 410 (2011)

Other Issues Attending the Use of Class Actions

Alan B. Morrison, Improving the Class Action Settlement Process: Little Things Mean a Lot, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 428 (2011)

Linda S. Mullenix, Federal Class Actions: A Near-Death Experience in a Shady Grove, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 448 (2011)

Edward F. Sherman, “Abandoned Claims” in Class Actions: Implications for Preclusion and Adequacy of Counsel, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 483 (2011)

Nonclass Aggregate Litigation

Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Group Consensus, Individual Consent, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 506 (2011)

David Betson & Jay Tidmarsh, Optimal Class Size, Opt-Out Rights, and “Indivisible” Remedies, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 542 (2011)

Robert G. Bone, The Puzzling Idea of Adjudicative Representation: Lessons for Aggregate Litigation and Class Actions, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 577 (2011)

Judith Resnik, Compared to What?: ALI Aggregation and the Shifting Contours of Due Process and of Lawyers’ Powers, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 628 (2011)

Ethics in Aggregate Litigation

Lester Brickman, Anatomy of an Aggregate Settlement: The Triumph of Temptation over Ethics, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 700 (2011)

Nancy J. Moore, The Absence of Legal Ethics in the ALI’s Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation: A Missed Opportunity—and More, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 717 (2011)

Thomas D. Morgan, Client Representation vs. Case Administration: The ALI Looks at Legal Ethics Issues in Aggregate Settlements, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 734 (2011)

Charles Silver, Ethics and Innovation, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 754 (2011)

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 79:1 (November 2010)

George Washington Law Review — Tue, 30 Nov 2010 22:46:35 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 79:1 (November 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles

Geoffrey P. Miller, The Corporate Law Background of the Necessary and Proper Clause, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1 (2010)

Brian Galle & Manuel Utset, Is Cap-and-Trade Fair to the Poor? Shortsighted Households and the Timing of Consumption Taxes, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 33 (2010)

Todd David Peterson, The Timing of Minimum Contacts, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 101 (2010)

Michael R. Siebecker, A New Discourse Theory of the Firm After Citizens United, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 161 (2010)

Notes

Shireen Y. Husain, A Voice for the Voiceless: A Child’s Right to Legal Representation in Dependency Proceedings, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 232 (2010)

Joshua Weiss, Medical Marketing in the United States: A Prescription for Reform, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 260 (2010)

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:6 (September 2010)

George Washington Law Review — Tue, 28 Sep 2010 01:39:08 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:6 (September 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

JUDICIAL REVIEW: HISTORICAL DEBATE, MODERN PERSPECTIVES, AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES

LAW AND JUDICIAL DUTY

Ann Althouse, The Historical Ordinariness of Judicial Review, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1123 (2010)

Mary Sarah Bilder, Expounding the Law, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1129 (2010)

G. Edward White, The Lost Origins of American Judicial Review, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1145 (2010)

Philip Hamburger, A Tale of Two Paradigms: Judicial Review and Judicial Duty, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1162 (2010)

THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE

Jenna Bednar, The Dialogic Theory of Judicial Review: A New Social Science Research Agenda, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1178 (2010)

William E. Forbath, The Will of the People? Pollsters, Elites, and Other Difficulties, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1191 (2010)

Richard Primus, Public Consensus as Constitutional Authority, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1207 (2010)

Barry Friedman, The Will of the People and the Process of Constitutional Change, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1232 (2010)

CONTEMPORARY AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO JUDICIAL REVIEW

Craig S. Lerner & Nelson Lund, Judicial Duty and the Supreme Court’s Cult of Celebrity, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1255 (2010)

Mark Tushnet, Incentives and the Supreme Court, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1300 (2010)

ESSAY

Amanda L. Tyler, Setting the Supreme Court’s Agenda: Is There a Place for Certification, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1310 (2010)

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:5 (July 2010)

George Washington Law Review — Wed, 28 Jul 2010 01:15:36 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:5 (July 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

ANNUAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Foreword

Jerry L. Mashaw, The American Model of Federal Administrative Law: Remembering the First One Hundred Years, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 975 (2010)

Case Study

Wayne A. Logan, The Adam Walsh Act and the Failed Promise of Administrative Federalism, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 993 (2010)

Administrative Law Essays

Matthew Albanese, Reasonably Untimely: The Difficulty of Knowing When to File a Claim for Attorney’s Fees in Social Security Cases, and an Administrative Solution, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1014 (2010)

Robert Hatch, Reforming the Murky Depths of Wall Street: Putting the Spotlight on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulatory Proposal Concerning Dark Pools of Liquidity, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1032 (2010)

Joseph A. Peters, The Meaningful Vote Commission: Restraining Gerrymanders with a Federal Agency, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1051 (2010)

Peter E. Shapiro, Union Shops, Not Border Shops: Updating NRLB Sanctions to Help Organize Immigrant Workers After Hoffman, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1069 (2010)

Paul T. Stepnowsky, Deference to Presidential Signing Statements in Administrative Law, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1086 (2010)

Mark Taticchi, Avoiding the Chill: A Proposal to Impose the Avoidance Canon on the FCC, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1102 (2010)

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:4 (June 2010)

George Washington Law Review — Thu, 24 Jun 2010 05:46:10 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:4 (June 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles

Christopher S. Yoo, Free Speech and the Myth of the Internet as an Unintermediated Experience, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 697 (2010)

Steve P. Calandrillo, Penalizing Punitive Damages: Why the Supreme Court Needs a Lesson in Law and Economics, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 774 (2010)

Essay

Danielle Keats Citron, Fulfilling Government 2.0′s Promise with Robust Privacy Protections, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 822 (2010)

Book Review

Chad M. Oldfather, Oral History and the Study of the Judiciary, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 846 (2010)

Notes

Joshua P. Borden, Derailing Penn Central: A Post-Lingle, Cost-Basis Approach to Regulatory Takings, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 870 (2010)

Alex Brazier, The People on the Bus Get Searched and Seized: Why Police Conduct in Suspicionless Bus Sweeps Should Be Circumscribed, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 908 (2010)

Daniel George, That Is What We Said, but This Is What We Meant: Putting the Meaning Back into Use-of-Force Legislation, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 942 (2010)

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:3 (April 2010)

George Washington Law Review — Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:37:50 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:3 (April 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

THE FEDERAL CIRCUIT: THE NATIONAL APPELLATE COURT CELEBRATION AND INTROSPECTIVE SYMPOSIUM

The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch, Keynote Address, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 513 (2010)

John F. Duffy, The Federal Circuit in the Shadow of the Solicitor General, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 518 (2010)

John M. Golden, The Federal Circuit and the D.C. Circuit: Comparative Trials of Two Semi-Specialized Courts, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 553 (2010)

Paul D. Carrington & Paulina Orchard, The Federal Circuit: A Model for Reform?, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 575 (2010)

Ralph C. Nash, Jr., The Government Contract Decisions of the Federal Court, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 586 (2010)

Notes

Anthony Bernard, Holding Corporations Liable in the United States for Aiding and Abetting Human Rights Violations Abroad: A Statutory Solution, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 615 (2010)

Timothy Frey, Your Insurance Does Not Cover That: Disability-Based Discrimination Where It Hurts the Most, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 636 (2010)

Andrew Frohlich, Volunteering to Deceive: Criminalizing Citizen-Group Espionage, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 668 (2010)

The George Washington Law Review – Arguendo (March 2010)

George Washington Law Review — Sat, 10 Apr 2010 18:58:23 +0000

The George Washington Law Review - Arguendo (March 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Essay

Danielle Keats Citron, Fulfilling Government 2.0′s Promise with Robust Privacy Protections, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo (March 2010).

Book Review

Chad M. Oldfather, Oral History and the Study of the Judiciary, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo (March 2010).

* Note: the above Essay and Book Review have now been published in 78:4, which can be found here.

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:2 (February 2010)

George Washington Law Review — Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:57:13 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:2 (February 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles

Austen L. Parrish, Duplicative Foreign Litigation, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 237 (2010)

Nathan Alexander Sales, Share and Share Alike: Intelligence Agencies and Information Sharing, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 279 (2010)

Essay

A. Benjamin Spencer, The Restrictive Ethos in Civil Procedure, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 353 (2010)

Notes

Bruce Corey, At Writ’s End: Using the Law of Nations to Decide the Extraterritorial Reach of the Suspension Clause, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 374 (2010)

Allison S. Owen, Leaving Behind a Good Idea: How No Child Left Behind Fails to Incorporate the Individualized Spirit of the IDEA, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 405 (2010)

Richard F. Shordt, Not Registered to Vote? Sign This, Mail It, and Go Hire a Lawyer, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 438 (2010)

Mark Taticchi, Redefining Possessory Interests: Perfect Copies of Information as Fourth Amendment Seizures, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 476 (2010)

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:1 (November 2009)

George Washington Law Review — Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:28:49 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:1 (November 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

A Tribute to Jack H. Friedenthal: Fifty Years in Legal Education

The George Washington Law Review, Dedication, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. i (2009)

The Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg, In Celebration of Jack Friedenthal, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1 (2009)

Frederick M. Lawrence, Jack Friedenthal: A Scholar, a Teacher, and a Dean’s Dean, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 3 (2009)

Helen Hershkoff and Arthur R. Miller, Celebrating Jack H. Friedenthal: The Views of Two Co-authors, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 9 (2009)

Mary Kay Kane, Pretrial Procedural Reform and Jack Friedenthal, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 30 (2009)

Articles

Lawrence A. Cunningham and David Zaring, The Three or Four Approaches to Financial Regulation: A Cautionary Analysis Against Exuberance in Crisis Response, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 39 (2009)

Justin R. Long, Against Certification, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 114 (2009)

Notes

Nikhel Sus, Yes We Can . . . Fire You For Sending Political E-mails: A Proposal to Update the Hatch Act for the Twenty-First Century, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 171 (2009)

Mike Wagner, Warrantless Wiretapping, Retroactive Immunity, and the Fifth Amendment, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 204 (2009)

_____________________________________

The George Washington Law Review is pleased to announce the launch of its new website and online forum, Arguendo (www.gwlawreview.org). Arguendo will publish original articles and essays directly to the web, giving contributing authors an opportunity to contribute to scholarly discourse much sooner than with traditional (print) legal scholarship. In general, such pieces should range from 5,000 – 10,000 words (including footnotes), though exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis. The Law Review will subsequently publish all non-student (and select student) pieces exceeding 5,000 words in a cumulative print issue at the end of the year. This will allow contributing authors both to have their work published more quickly than is standard for legal periodicals and to receive a traditional citation, e.g., 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. ___ (2009), for their piece.

Submissions for Arguendo will be accepted on a rolling basis. If interested in publishing on Arguendo, please e-mail gwlrarguendo@law.gwu.edu with a copy of your essay and curriculum vitae attached. Please also e-mail that address with any questions about Arguendo or our publication process.

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:5/6 (September 2009)

George Washington Law Review — Thu, 01 Oct 2009 20:55:29 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:5/6 (September 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

What Does our Legal System Owe Future Generations? New Analysis of Intergenerational Justice for a New Century

Philosophical Perspectives on Intergenerational Justice: Who, What, How, and Why?

Robert Hockett, Justice in Time, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1135 (2009) [PDF]

Ori J. Herstein, The Identity and (Legal) Rights of Future Generations, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1173 (2009) [PDF]

David DeGrazia, Just(ice) in Time for Future Generations: A Response to Hockett and Herstein , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1216 (2009) [PDF]

Government Finances Today and Economic Prosperity Tomorrow

Neil H. Buchanan, What Do We Owe Future Generations?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1237 (2009) [PDF]

Daniel Shaviro, The Long-Term U.S. Fiscal Gap: Is the Main Problem Generational Inequity?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1298 (2009) [PDF]

Lawrence Zelenak, Does Intergenerational Justice Require Rising Standards of Living?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1358 (2009) [PDF]

Nancy J. Altman, Social Security and Intergenerational Justice, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1383 (2009) [PDF]

Neil H. Buchanan, Four out of Four Panelists Agree: U.S. Fiscal Policy Does Not Cheat Future Generations, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1402 (2009) [PDF]

Does the Earth Belong to the Living? Property and Environmental Law Perspectives on the Rights of Future Generations

Jamison E. Colburn, Splitting the Atom of Property: Rights Experimentalism as Obligation to Future Generations, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1411 (2009) [PDF]

Matthew D. Adler, Future Generations: A Prioritarian View, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1478 (2009) [PDF]

William W. Buzbee, Preemption Hard Look Review, Regulatory Interaction, and the Quest for Stewardship and Intergenerational Equity , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1521 (2009) [PDF]

The Impact of Reproductive Rights Today on the Composition of Future Generations

Sherry F. Colb, To Whom Do We Refer When We Speak of Obligations to “Future Generations”? Reproductive Rights and the Intergenerational Community, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1521 (2009) [PDF]

Ann Shalleck, Offspring and Bodies: Dependency and Vulnerability in the Constitutional Jurisprudence of Reproductive Rights, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1620 (2009) [PDF]

The Living Constitution and Future Generations

Michael C. Dorf, The Aspirational Constitution, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1631 (2009) [PDF]

The George Washington Law Review

George Washington Law Review — Mon, 14 Sep 2009 14:28:12 +0000

The George Washington Law Review will soon launch launch its new web site and online forum, Arguendo. Arguendo will publish original articles and essays directly to the web, giving contributing authors an opportunity to contribute to scholarly discourse much sooner than with traditional (print) legal scholarship. In general, such pieces should range from 5,000 – 10,000 words (including footnotes), though exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis. The Law Review will subsequently publish all non-student (and select student) pieces exceeding 5,000 words in a cumulative print issue at the end of the year. This will allow contributing authors both to have their work published more quickly than is standard for legal periodicals and to receive a traditional citation, e.g., 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. ___ (2009), for their piece.

We are currently accepting submissions for Arguendo and will continue doing so on a rolling basis. If interested in publishing on Arguendo, please e-mail gwlrarguendo@law.gwu.edu with a copy of your essay and curriculum vitae attached. Please also e-mail that address with any questions about Arguendo or our publication process.

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:4 (June 2009)

George Washington Law Review — Fri, 28 Aug 2009 15:49:00 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:4 (June 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Annual Review of Administrative Law

Foreword

Elizabeth Magill, Agency Self-Regulation, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 859 (2009) [PDF]

Essay

John F. Duffy, Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 904 (2009) [PDF]

Report

Cary Coglianese, Heather Kilmartin, and Evan Mendelson, Transparency and Public Participation in the Federal Rulemaking Process: Recommendations for the New Administration , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 924 (2009) [PDF]

Book Review

Peter H. Schuck, Is a Competent Federal Government Becoming Oxymoronic?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 973 (2009) [PDF]

Administrative Law Essays

Christopher Carlberg, Early to Bed for Federal Regulations: A New Attempt to Avoid “Midnight Regulations” and Its Effect on Political Accountability, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 992 (2009) [PDF]

Andrew Croner, Morrison, Edmond, and the Power of Appointments, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1002 (2009) [PDF]

Shaina N. Elias, Challenges to Inclusion on the “No-Fly List” Should Fly in District Court: Considering the Jurisdictional Implications of Administrative Agency Structure, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1015 (2009) [PDF]

Ben Everard, Early Termination Fees: Fair Game or Federally Preempted?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1033 (2009) [PDF]

Elliot Golding, Medicare Part D: Rights Without Remedies, Bars to Relief, and Miles of Red Tape, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1044 (2009) [PDF]

Julian Helisek, The Fault, Dear PCAOB, Lies Not in the Appointments Clause, but in the Removal Power, That You Are Unconstitutional, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1063 (2009) [PDF]

Elliott Karr, Independent Litigation Authority and Calls for the View of the Solicitor General , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1080 (2009) [PDF]

Megan Keane, Patent Reexamination and the Seventh Amendment, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1101 (2009) [PDF]

Stephen Satterfield, A New Interpretation, and Absurd Result: How HHS Is Short-Changing Children with Severe Mental Illness , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1114 (2009) [PDF]

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:3 (April 2009)

George Washington Law Review — Sat, 30 May 2009 19:11:36 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:3 (April 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles

Matthew I. Hall, The Partially Prudential Doctrine of Mootness, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 562 (2009) [PDF]

Anthony J. Colangelo, “De facto Sovereignty”: Boumediene and Beyond, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 623 (2009) [PDF]

Colloquy

Beyond the ‘Races’: Re-examining the Relationship Between Federalism and Corporate Governance

William W. Bratton, Unentrapped, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 677 (2009) [PDF]

Lawrence A. Cunningham, The New Federal Corporation Law?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 685 (2009) [PDF]

M. Todd Henderson, Two Visions of Corporate Law, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 708 (2009) [PDF]

Robert B. Ahdieh, The (Misunderstood) Genius of American Corporate Law, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 730 (2009) [PDF]

Notes

Christopher Carlberg, Cooperative Noncooperation: A Proposal for an Effective Uniform Noncooperation Immigration Policy for Local Governments, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 730 (2009) [PDF]

Andrew Croner, A Snake in the Grass?: Section 798 of the Espionage Act and Its Constitutionality as Applied to the Press, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 766 (2009) [PDF]

Evan Mayor, The “Bong Hits” Case and Viewpoint Discrimination: A State Law Answer to Protecting Unpopular Student Viewpoints, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 799 (2009) [PDF]

Christopher Meeks, The Pollution Delusion: A Proposal for a Uniform Interpretation of Pollution in General Liability Absolute Pollution Exclusions, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 824 (2009) [PDF]

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:2 (February 2009)

George Washington Law Review — Fri, 15 May 2009 15:41:56 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:2 (February 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles:

Robert B. Ahdieh, Trapped in a Metaphor: The Limited Implications of Federalism for Corporate Governance, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 255 (2009) [PDF]

Chad M. Oldfather, Universal De Novo Review, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 308 (2009) [PDF]

Todd S. Aagaard, Factual Premises of Statutory Interpretation in Agency Review Cases, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 366 (2009) [PDF]

Notes:

Rachel Frankel, Sharks and Minnows: Using Temporary Alien Deportation Immunity to Catch the Big Fish, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 431 (2009) [PDF]

Rita Glasionov, In Furtherance of Transparency and Litigants’ Rights: Reforming the State Secrets Privilege, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 458 (2009) [PDF]

Megha Shah, Grassroots Enforcement of EISA: The Need for a Citizen Suit Provision in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 488 (2009) [PDF]

Ross L. Weiner, The Office of Legal Counsel and Torture: The Law as Both a Sword and Shield, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 524 (2009) [PDF]

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:1 (November 2008)

George Washington Law Review — Wed, 15 Apr 2009 19:13:06 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:1 (November 2008)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles:

Stuart Minor Benjamin and Arti K. Rai, Fixing Innovation Policy: A Structural Perspective , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1 (2008) [PDF]

Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash, Exhuming the Seemingly Moribund Declaration of War, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 89 (2008) [PDF]

Notes:

Christopher Bruno, A Right to Decide Not to Be a Legal Father: Gonzales v. Carhart and the Acceptance of Emotional Harm as a Constitutionally Protected Interest, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 141 (2008) [PDF]

Shaina N. Elias, From Bereavement to Banishment: The Deportation of Surviving Alien Spouses Under the “Widow Penalty” , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 172 (2008) [PDF]

Stephen Satterfield, Still Crying Out for Clarification: The Scope of Liability Under the Alien Tort Statute After Sosa, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 216 (2008) [PDF]

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 76:6 (June 2008)

George Washington Law Review — Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:34:44 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 76:6 (June 2008)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles:

Radhika Rao, Equal Liberty: Assisted Reproductive Technology and Reproductive Equality, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1457 (2008) [PDF]

John A. Robertson, Assisting Reproduction, Choosing Genes, and the Scope of Reproductive Freedom , 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1490 (2008) [PDF]

Sonia M. Suter, The “Repugnance” Lens of Gonzales v. Carhart and Other Theories of Reproductive Rights: Evaluating Advanced Reproductive Technologies, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1514 (2008) [PDF]

Rebecca Dresser, From Double Standard to Double Bind: Informed Choice in Abortion Law, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1599 (2008) [PDF]

Marsha Garrison, Regulating Reproduction, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1623 (2008) [PDF]

Michele Goodwin, Prosecuting the Womb, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1657 (2008) [PDF]

June Carbone, If I Say “Yes” to Regulation Today, Will You Still Respect me in The Morning?, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1747 (2008) [PDF]

John Gastil, Justin Reedy, Donald Braman, & Dan M. Kahan, Deliberation Across the Cultural Divide: Assessing the Potential for Reconciling Conflicting Cultural Orientations to Reproductive Technology, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1772 (2008) [PDF]

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 76:2 (February 2008)

George Washington Law Review — Mon, 18 Feb 2008 01:23:59 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 76:2 (February 2008)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Lecture:

Roger H. Trangsrud, James F. Humphreys Complex Litigation Lecture:

The Adversary System and Modern Class Action Practice, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 181 (2008) [PDF]

Articles:

Gia B. Lee, The President’s Secrets, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 197 (2008) [PDF]

Jeffrey M. Hirsch, The Silicon Bullet: Will the Internet Kill the NLRA?, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 262 (2008) [PDF]

Jonathan Turley, Too Clever By Half: The Unconstitutionality of Partial Representation of the District of Columbia in Congress, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 305 (2008) [PDF]

Notes:

Russell M. Gold, Is This Your Bedroom?: Reconsidering Third-Party Consent Searches Under Modern Living Arrangements, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 375 (2008) [PDF]

Jacob Rogers, A Passive Approach to Regulation of Virtual Worlds, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 405 (2008) [PDF]

R. Andrew Schwentker, Experimenting With the Experimental-Use Exception: Proposals for a Tax Alternative, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 426 (2008) [PDF]

George Washington Law Review, Issue 76:1 (November 2007)

George Washington Law Review — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:18:48 +0000

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 76:1 (November 2007)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles:

Calvin Massey, Two Zones of Prophylaxis: The Scope of the Fourteenth Amendment Enforcement Power, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1 (2007) [PDF]

Debra Lyn Bassett, Statutory Interpretation in the Context of Federal Jurisdiction, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 52 (2007) [PDF]

Essay:

Jerry L. Mashaw, Reasoned Administration: The E.U., the U.S., and the Project of Democratic Governance, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 99 (2007) [PDF]

Notes:

Seema Mittal, The Constitutionality of an Expedited Rescission Act: The New Line Item Veto or a New Constitutional Method of Achieving Deficit Reduction?, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 125 (2007) [PDF]

Kathryn E. Vertigan, Foreign Antisuit Injunctions: Taking a Lesson from the Act of State Doctrine, 76 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 155 (2007) [PDF]

Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project

Daniel Solove — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:10:48 +0000

I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.

The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!

Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.

Participating law reviews thus far include:

* Boston College

* Chicago

* Columbia

* Cornell

* Duke

* Emory

* Fordham

* Georgetown

* GW

* Harvard

* Indiana

* Michigan

* Minnesota

* NYU

* Northwestern

* Notre Dame

* Southern California

* Stanford

* Texas

* UCLA

* Vanderbilt

* Virginia

* Washington University

* Yale

We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.

We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.

Announcing the Law Review Forum Project

Daniel Solove — Tue, 24 Apr 2007 08:04:13 +0000

I am very pleased to announce a new project here at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Forum Project. We will be hosting online forums for several law reviews. Increasingly, law reviews are creating online forums as companions to their regular law review issues. These forums contain very short response pieces, essays, debates, and other works that attempt to bridge the gap between regular legal scholarship and the blogosphere.

Journals seeking to create their own online forum face two daunting challenges. First, they must create and actively maintain a web presence. Second, they must find ways to attract readers, which is difficult in an age where so many blogs and other websites exist. A wide readership for a website depends upon having daily content. Law review forums produce content sporadically throughout the year at intervals that are not regular enough to attract a significant readership.

Therefore, we have invited a number of law reviews to participate in a partnership with our blog. Throughout the year, each law review will periodically post forum essays here at Concurring Opinions. We are not requiring an exclusive license, so participating law reviews can also cross-post at their own websites.

We see this as a mutually-beneficial arrangement. We can bring great content to our blog, and law reviews can reach our significant audience without the pressures of having to build and maintain an online readership or of having to produce content with regularity.

Law reviews currently with and without existing forums will be participating. Thus far, the following law reviews have agreed to participate:

* Harvard Law Review

* Virginia Law Review

* Michigan Law Review

* University of Pennsylvania Law Review

* Northwestern Law Review

* UCLA Law Review

* George Washington Law Review

In the near future, we hope to be expanding the list of participating law reviews.