Archive for the ‘Law Rev (GW)’ Category

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 81:2 (March 2013)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 81:2 (March 2013)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles:

Mary Louise Fellows & Lily Kahng, Costly Mistakes: Undertaxed Business Owners and Overtaxed Workers, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 329 (2013) [PDF]

Marin K. Levy, Judicial Attention as a Scarce Resource: A Preliminary Defense of How Judges Allocate Time Across Cases in the Federal Courts of Appeals, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 401 (2013) [PDF]

Renee Lettow Lerner, The Rise of Directed Verdict: Jury Power in Civil Cases Before the Federal Rules of 1938, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 448 (2013) [PDF]

Notes:

Jessica L. Bayles, Regulating Bioreactor Landfills to Decrease Greenhouse Gas Emissions and Provide an Alternative Energy Source, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 526 (2013) [PDF]

Anna Crane, Lost in Translation: The Affordable Care Act’s Attempt to Make Insurance-Speak Understandable, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 556 (2013) [PDF]

Jeff Stricker, Casting a Wider ‘Net: How and Why State Laws Restricting Municipal Broadband Networks Must Be Modified, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 589 (2013) [PDF]

Yuri Weigel, Is “Protection” Always in the Best Interests of the Government?: An Argument to Narrow the Scope of Suspension and Debarment, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 627 (2013) [PDF]

  March 2, 2013 at 1:18 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   One Comment

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 81:1 (January 2013)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 81:1 (January 2013)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles:

Mark Bartholomew & John Tehranian, An Intersystemic View of Intellectual Property and Free Speech, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1 (2013) [PDF]

Barry Friedman & Sara Solow, The Federal Right to an Adequate Education, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 92 (2013) [PDF]

Shima Baradaran, Race, Prediction, and Discretion, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 157 (2013) [PDF]

Notes:

Jessica Horne, Pink Profiteers: Cause-Related Marketing and the Exploitation of Consumers’ Consciences, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 223 (2013) [PDF]

Daniel J. Riegel, Closing the 90/10 Loophole in the Higher Education Act: How to Stop Exploitation of Veterans, Protect American Taxpayers, and Restore Market Incentives to the For-Profit College Industry, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 259 (2013) [PDF]

Kathleen M. Stoughton, A New Approach to Voter ID Challenges: Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, 81 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 292 (2013) [PDF]

 

  January 26, 2013 at 1:22 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 80:6 (November 2012)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 80:6 (November 2012)

COMMEMORATING THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF FARRAND’S RECORDS OF THE FEDERAL CONVENTION

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Introduction:

William K. Kelley, Justice Antonin Scalia and the Long Game, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1601 (2012) [PDF]

Dialogue:

The Honorable Antonin Scalia & John F. Manning, A Dialogue on Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1610 (2012) [PDF]

Articles:

Mary Sarah Bilder, How Bad Were the Official Records of the Federal Convention?, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1620 (2012) [PDF]

Jamal Greene, The Case for Original Intent, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1683 (2012) [PDF]

Gregory E. Maggs, A Concise Guide to the Records of the Federal Constitutional Convention of 1787 as a Source of the Original Meaning of the U.S. Constitution, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1707 (2012) [PDF]

John F. Manning, The Role of the Philadelphia Convention in Constitutional Adjudication, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1753 (2012) [PDF]

Maeva Marcus, The Effect (or Non-Effect) of Founders on the Supreme Court Bench, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1794 (2012) [PDF]

Stephen E. Sachs, Constitutional Backdrops, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1813 (2012) [PDF]

Panel:

Amanda L. Tyler, Moderator, The Honorable Frank H. Easterbrook, The Honorable Brett M. Kavanaugh, The Honorable Charles F. Lettow, The Honorable Reena Raggi, The Honorable Jeffrey S. Sutton & The Honorable Diane P. Wood, A Dialogue with Federal Judges on the Role of History in Interpretation, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1889 (2012) [PDF]

 

 

  November 30, 2012 at 10:41 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 80:5 (July 2012)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 80:5 (July 2012)

ANNUAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Foreword:

Gillian E. Metzger, Embracing Administrative Common Law, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1293 (2012) [PDF]

Articles:

Patricia L. Bellia, PCAOB and the Persistence of the Removal Puzzle, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1371 (2012) [PDF]

Jason Webb Yackee & Susan Webb Yackee, Testing the Ossification Thesis: An Empirical Examination of Federal Regulatory Volume and Speed, 1950–1990, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1414 (2012) [PDF]

Response:
Richard J. Pierce, Jr., Rulemaking Ossification Is Real: A Response to Testing the Ossification Thesis, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1493 (2012) [PDF]

Administrative Law Essays:

Erik Benny, “Natural” Modifications: The FDA’s Need to Promulgate an Official Definition of
“Natural” that Includes Genetically Modified Organisms, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1504 (2012) [PDF]

Benjamin Kapnik, Affirming the Status Quo?: The FCC, ALJs, and Agency Adjudications, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1527 (2012) [PDF]

Matthew Radler, Amending the EEOC’s Disability Discrimination Regulations to Protect Employees with Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1546 (2012) [PDF]

Thomas Yeh, The International Trade Commission and the Nonpracticing Entity: Reviving the Injury Requirement for Domestic Industries Based on Licensing, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1574 (2012) [PDF]

  July 31, 2012 at 7:40 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 80:4 (June 2012)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 80:4 (June 2012)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles:

Claudia E. Haupt, Transnational Nonestablishment, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 991 (2012) [PDF]

Chester S. Chuang, Offensive Venue: The Curious Use of Declaratory Judgment to Forum Shop in Patent Litigation, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1065 (2012) [PDF]

Kimani Paul-Emile, The Regulation of Race in Science, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1115 (2012) [PDF]

Notes:

Christopher W. Dawson, From Wall Street to Wheat Fields: Using the Business Method Patent’s “First Inventor Defense” as a Model for Genetically Engineered Seed Protection, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1174 (2012) [PDF]

Matthew Radler, Privacy Is the Problem: United States v. Maynard and a Case for a New Regulatory Model for Police Surveillance, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1209 (2012) [PDF]

Brittany Warren, “If You Have a Zero-Tolerance Policy, Why Aren’t You Doing Anything?”: Using the Uniform Code of Military Justice to Combat Human Trafficking Abroad, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1255 (2012) [PDF]

  June 30, 2012 at 9:04 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 80:3 (April 2012)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 80:3 (April 2012)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles:

Allen Rostron, Justice Breyer’s Triumph in the Third Battle over the Second Amendment, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 703 (2012) [PDF]

Andrew A. Schwartz, The Perpetual Corporation, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 764 (2012) [PDF]

Sarah Tran, Administrative Law, Patents, and Distorted Rules, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 831 (2012) [PDF]

Notes:

Sam Cowin, You Don’t Have Mail: The Permissibility of Internet-Use Bans in Child Pornography Cases and the Need for Uniformity Across the Circuits, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 885 (2012) [PDF]

Scott A. Gilmore, Immunity Disorders: The Conflict of Foreign Official Immunity and Human Rights Litigation, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 918 (2012) [PDF]

Cyrus Zarraby, Regulating Carbon Capture and Sequestration: A Federal Regulatory Regime to Promote the Construction of a National Carbon Dioxide Pipeline Network, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 950 (2012) [PDF]

  May 4, 2012 at 3:39 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   7 Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 79:2 (February 2011)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 79:2 (February 2011)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Aggregate Litigation: Critical Perspectives

Foreword

Roger H. Trangsrud, Aggregate Litigation Reconsidered, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 293 (2011)

Keynote

Deborah R. Hensler, The Future of Mass Litigation: Global Class Actions and Third-Party Litigation Funding, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 306 (2011)

Issues in the Certification of Class Actions

Richard Marcus, Reviving Judicial Gatekeeping of Aggregation: Scrutinizing the Merits on Class Certification, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 324 (2011)

Luke McCloud & David Rosenberg, A Solution to the Choice of Law Problem of Differing State Laws in Class Actions: Average Law, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 374 (2011)

Patrick Woolley, The Jurisdictional Nature of Adequate Representation in Class Litigation, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 410 (2011)

Other Issues Attending the Use of Class Actions

Alan B. Morrison, Improving the Class Action Settlement Process: Little Things Mean a Lot, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 428 (2011)

Linda S. Mullenix, Federal Class Actions: A Near-Death Experience in a Shady Grove, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 448 (2011)

Edward F. Sherman, “Abandoned Claims” in Class Actions: Implications for Preclusion and Adequacy of Counsel, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 483 (2011)

Nonclass Aggregate Litigation

Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Group Consensus, Individual Consent, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 506 (2011)

David Betson & Jay Tidmarsh, Optimal Class Size, Opt-Out Rights, and “Indivisible” Remedies, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 542 (2011)

Robert G. Bone, The Puzzling Idea of Adjudicative Representation: Lessons for Aggregate Litigation and Class Actions, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 577 (2011)

Judith Resnik, Compared to What?: ALI Aggregation and the Shifting Contours of Due Process and of Lawyers’ Powers, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 628 (2011)

Ethics in Aggregate Litigation

Lester Brickman, Anatomy of an Aggregate Settlement: The Triumph of Temptation over Ethics, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 700 (2011)

Nancy J. Moore, The Absence of Legal Ethics in the ALI’s Principles of the Law of Aggregate Litigation: A Missed Opportunity—and More, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 717 (2011)

Thomas D. Morgan, Client Representation vs. Case Administration: The ALI Looks at Legal Ethics Issues in Aggregate Settlements, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 734 (2011)

Charles Silver, Ethics and Innovation, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 754 (2011)

  February 28, 2011 at 8:50 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 79:1 (November 2010)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 79:1 (November 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

 Articles

Geoffrey P. Miller, The Corporate Law Background of the Necessary and Proper Clause, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1 (2010)

Brian Galle & Manuel Utset, Is Cap-and-Trade Fair to the Poor? Shortsighted Households and the Timing of Consumption Taxes, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 33 (2010)

Todd David Peterson, The Timing of Minimum Contacts, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 101 (2010)

Michael R. Siebecker, A New Discourse Theory of the Firm After Citizens United, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 161 (2010) 

Notes

Shireen Y. Husain, A Voice for the Voiceless: A Child’s Right to Legal Representation in Dependency Proceedings, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 232 (2010) 

Joshua Weiss, Medical Marketing in the United States: A Prescription for Reform, 79 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 260 (2010)

  November 30, 2010 at 5:46 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW), Uncategorized   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:6 (September 2010)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:6 (September 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

JUDICIAL REVIEW: HISTORICAL DEBATE, MODERN PERSPECTIVES, AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES 

 LAW AND JUDICIAL DUTY

Ann Althouse, The Historical Ordinariness of Judicial Review, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1123 (2010)

Mary Sarah Bilder, Expounding the Law, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1129 (2010)

G. Edward White, The Lost Origins of American Judicial Review, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1145 (2010)

Philip Hamburger, A Tale of Two Paradigms: Judicial Review and Judicial Duty, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1162 (2010) 

THE WILL OF THE PEOPLE

Jenna Bednar, The Dialogic Theory of Judicial Review: A New Social Science Research Agenda, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1178 (2010)

William E. Forbath, The Will of the People? Pollsters, Elites, and Other Difficulties, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1191 (2010) 

Richard Primus, Public Consensus as Constitutional Authority, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1207 (2010)

Barry Friedman, The Will of the People and the Process of Constitutional Change, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1232 (2010) 

CONTEMPORARY AND COMPARATIVE APPROACHES TO JUDICIAL REVIEW

Craig S. Lerner & Nelson Lund, Judicial Duty and the Supreme Court’s Cult of Celebrity, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1255 (2010)

Mark Tushnet, Incentives and the Supreme Court, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1300 (2010) 

ESSAY

Amanda L. Tyler, Setting the Supreme Court’s Agenda: Is There a Place for Certification, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1310 (2010)

  September 27, 2010 at 9:39 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW), Uncategorized   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:5 (July 2010)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:5 (July 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

ANNUAL REVIEW OF ADMINISTRATIVE LAW

Foreword

Jerry L. Mashaw, The American Model of Federal Administrative Law: Remembering the First One Hundred Years, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 975 (2010)

Case Study

Wayne A. Logan, The Adam Walsh Act and the Failed Promise of Administrative Federalism, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 993 (2010)

Administrative Law Essays

Matthew Albanese, Reasonably Untimely: The Difficulty of Knowing When to File a Claim for Attorney’s Fees in Social Security Cases, and an Administrative Solution, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1014 (2010)

Robert Hatch, Reforming the Murky Depths of Wall Street: Putting the Spotlight on the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Regulatory Proposal Concerning Dark Pools of Liquidity, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1032 (2010) 

Joseph A. Peters, The Meaningful Vote Commission: Restraining Gerrymanders with a Federal Agency, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1051 (2010)

Peter E. Shapiro, Union Shops, Not Border Shops: Updating NRLB Sanctions to Help Organize Immigrant Workers After Hoffman, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1069 (2010)

Paul T. Stepnowsky, Deference to Presidential Signing Statements in Administrative Law, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1086 (2010)

Mark Taticchi, Avoiding the Chill: A Proposal to Impose the Avoidance Canon on the FCC, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1102 (2010)

  July 27, 2010 at 9:15 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:4 (June 2010)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:4 (June 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles

Christopher S. Yoo, Free Speech and the Myth of the Internet as an Unintermediated Experience, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 697 (2010)

Steve P. Calandrillo, Penalizing Punitive Damages: Why the Supreme Court Needs a Lesson in Law and Economics, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 774 (2010)

Essay

Danielle Keats Citron, Fulfilling Government 2.0′s Promise with Robust Privacy Protections, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 822 (2010)

Book Review

Chad M. Oldfather, Oral History and the Study of the Judiciary, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 846 (2010) 

Notes

Joshua P. Borden, Derailing Penn Central: A Post-Lingle, Cost-Basis Approach to Regulatory Takings, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 870 (2010)

Alex Brazier, The People on the Bus Get Searched and Seized: Why Police Conduct in Suspicionless Bus Sweeps Should Be Circumscribed, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 908 (2010)

Daniel George, That Is What We Said, but This Is What We Meant: Putting the Meaning Back into Use-of-Force Legislation, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 942 (2010)

  June 24, 2010 at 1:46 am   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   One Comment

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:3 (April 2010)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:3 (April 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

THE FEDERAL  CIRCUIT:  THE NATIONAL APPELLATE COURT CELEBRATION AND INTROSPECTIVE SYMPOSIUM

The Honorable Orrin G. Hatch, Keynote Address, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 513 (2010)

John F. Duffy, The Federal Circuit in the Shadow of the Solicitor General, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 518 (2010)

John M. Golden, The Federal Circuit and the D.C. Circuit: Comparative Trials of Two Semi-Specialized Courts, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 553 (2010)

Paul D. Carrington & Paulina Orchard, The Federal Circuit: A Model for Reform?, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 575 (2010)

Ralph C. Nash, Jr., The Government Contract Decisions of the Federal Court, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 586 (2010)

Notes

Anthony Bernard, Holding Corporations Liable in the United States for Aiding and Abetting Human Rights Violations Abroad: A Statutory Solution, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 615 (2010)

Timothy Frey, Your Insurance Does Not Cover That: Disability-Based Discrimination Where It Hurts the Most, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 636 (2010)

Andrew Frohlich, Volunteering to Deceive: Criminalizing Citizen-Group Espionage, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 668 (2010)

  April 28, 2010 at 9:37 am   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review – Arguendo (March 2010)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review - Arguendo (March 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Essay

Danielle Keats Citron, Fulfilling Government 2.0′s Promise with Robust Privacy Protections, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo (March 2010).

Book Review

Chad M. Oldfather,  Oral History and the Study of the Judiciary, Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo (March 2010).

* Note: the above Essay and Book Review have now been published in 78:4, which can be found here.

  April 10, 2010 at 2:58 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:2 (February 2010)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:2 (February 2010)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles

Austen L. Parrish, Duplicative Foreign Litigation, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 237 (2010)

Nathan Alexander Sales, Share and Share Alike: Intelligence Agencies and Information Sharing, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 279 (2010)

Essay

A. Benjamin Spencer, The Restrictive Ethos in Civil Procedure, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 353 (2010)

Notes

Bruce Corey, At Writ’s End: Using the Law of Nations to Decide the Extraterritorial Reach of the Suspension Clause, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 374 (2010)

Allison S. Owen, Leaving Behind a Good Idea: How No Child Left Behind Fails to Incorporate the Individualized Spirit of the IDEA, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 405 (2010)

Richard F. Shordt, Not Registered to Vote? Sign This, Mail It, and Go Hire a Lawyer, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 438 (2010)

Mark Taticchi, Redefining Possessory Interests: Perfect Copies of Information as Fourth Amendment Seizures, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 476 (2010)

  February 28, 2010 at 10:57 am   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:1 (November 2009)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 78:1 (November 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

A Tribute to Jack H. Friedenthal: Fifty Years in Legal Education

Mary Kay Kane, Pretrial Procedural Reform and Jack Friedenthal, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 30 (2009)

Articles

Notes

Nikhel Sus, Yes We Can . . . Fire You For Sending Political E-mails: A Proposal to Update the Hatch Act for the Twenty-First Century, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 171 (2009)

Mike Wagner, Warrantless Wiretapping, Retroactive Immunity, and the Fifth Amendment, 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 204 (2009)

_____________________________________

The George Washington Law Review is pleased to announce the launch of its new website and online forum, Arguendo (www.gwlawreview.org). Arguendo will publish original articles and essays directly to the web, giving contributing authors an opportunity to contribute to scholarly discourse much sooner than with traditional (print) legal scholarship. In general, such pieces should range from 5,000 – 10,000 words (including footnotes), though exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis. The Law Review will subsequently publish all non-student (and select student) pieces exceeding 5,000 words in a cumulative print issue at the end of the year. This will allow contributing authors both to have their work published more quickly than is standard for legal periodicals and to receive a traditional citation, e.g., 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. ___ (2009), for their piece.

Submissions for Arguendo will be accepted on a rolling basis. If interested in publishing on Arguendo, please e-mail gwlrarguendo@law.gwu.edu with a copy of your essay and curriculum vitae attached. Please also e-mail that address with any questions about Arguendo or our publication process.

  November 30, 2009 at 5:28 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   2 Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:5/6 (September 2009)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:5/6 (September 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Robert Hockett, Justice in Time, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1135 (2009) [PDF]

Ori J. Herstein, The Identity and (Legal) Rights of Future Generations, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1173 (2009) [PDF]

David DeGrazia, Just(ice) in Time for Future Generations: A Response to Hockett and Herstein , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1216 (2009) [PDF]

Neil H. Buchanan, What Do We Owe Future Generations?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1237 (2009) [PDF]

Daniel Shaviro, The Long-Term U.S. Fiscal Gap: Is the Main Problem Generational Inequity?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1298 (2009) [PDF]

Lawrence Zelenak, Does Intergenerational Justice Require Rising Standards of Living?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1358 (2009) [PDF]

Nancy J. Altman, Social Security and Intergenerational Justice, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1383 (2009) [PDF]

Neil H. Buchanan, Four out of Four Panelists Agree: U.S. Fiscal Policy Does Not Cheat Future Generations, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1402 (2009) [PDF]

Jamison E. Colburn, Splitting the Atom of Property: Rights Experimentalism as Obligation to Future Generations, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1411 (2009) [PDF]

Matthew D. Adler, Future Generations: A Prioritarian View, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1478 (2009) [PDF]

William W. Buzbee, Preemption Hard Look Review, Regulatory Interaction, and the Quest for Stewardship and Intergenerational Equity , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1521 (2009) [PDF]

Sherry F. Colb, To Whom Do We Refer When We Speak of Obligations to “Future Generations”? Reproductive Rights and the Intergenerational Community, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1521 (2009) [PDF]

Ann Shalleck, Offspring and Bodies: Dependency and Vulnerability in the Constitutional Jurisprudence of Reproductive Rights, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1620 (2009) [PDF]

Michael C. Dorf, The Aspirational Constitution, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1631 (2009) [PDF]

  October 1, 2009 at 1:55 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review will soon launch launch its new web site and online forum, Arguendo. Arguendo will publish original articles and essays directly to the web, giving contributing authors an opportunity to contribute to scholarly discourse much sooner than with traditional (print) legal scholarship. In general, such pieces should range from 5,000 – 10,000 words (including footnotes), though exceptions will be considered on a case-by-case basis. The Law Review will subsequently publish all non-student (and select student) pieces exceeding 5,000 words in a cumulative print issue at the end of the year. This will allow contributing authors both to have their work published more quickly than is standard for legal periodicals and to receive a traditional citation, e.g., 78 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. ___ (2009), for their piece.

We are currently accepting submissions for Arguendo and will continue doing so on a rolling basis. If interested in publishing on Arguendo, please e-mail gwlrarguendo@law.gwu.edu with a copy of your essay and curriculum vitae attached. Please also e-mail that address with any questions about Arguendo or our publication process.

  September 14, 2009 at 7:28 am   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:4 (June 2009)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:4 (June 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Elizabeth Magill, Agency Self-Regulation, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 859 (2009) [PDF]

John F. Duffy, Are Administrative Patent Judges Unconstitutional?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 904 (2009) [PDF]

Cary Coglianese, Heather Kilmartin, and Evan Mendelson, Transparency and Public Participation in the Federal Rulemaking Process: Recommendations for the New Administration , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 924 (2009) [PDF]

Peter H. Schuck, Is a Competent Federal Government Becoming Oxymoronic?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 973 (2009) [PDF]

Christopher Carlberg, Early to Bed for Federal Regulations: A New Attempt to Avoid “Midnight Regulations” and Its Effect on Political Accountability, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 992 (2009) [PDF]

Andrew Croner, Morrison, Edmond, and the Power of Appointments, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1002 (2009) [PDF]

Shaina N. Elias, Challenges to Inclusion on the “No-Fly List” Should Fly in District Court: Considering the Jurisdictional Implications of Administrative Agency Structure, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1015 (2009) [PDF]

Ben Everard, Early Termination Fees: Fair Game or Federally Preempted?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1033 (2009) [PDF]

Elliot Golding, Medicare Part D: Rights Without Remedies, Bars to Relief, and Miles of Red Tape, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1044 (2009) [PDF]

Julian Helisek, The Fault, Dear PCAOB, Lies Not in the Appointments Clause, but in the Removal Power, That You Are Unconstitutional, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1063 (2009) [PDF]

Elliott Karr, Independent Litigation Authority and Calls for the View of the Solicitor General , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1080 (2009) [PDF]

Megan Keane, Patent Reexamination and the Seventh Amendment, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1101 (2009) [PDF]

Stephen Satterfield, A New Interpretation, and Absurd Result: How HHS Is Short-Changing Children with Severe Mental Illness , 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1114 (2009) [PDF]

  August 28, 2009 at 8:49 am   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:3 (April 2009)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:3 (April 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Matthew I. Hall, The Partially Prudential Doctrine of Mootness, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 562 (2009) [PDF]

Anthony J. Colangelo, “De facto Sovereignty”: Boumediene and Beyond, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 623 (2009) [PDF]

William W. Bratton, Unentrapped, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 677 (2009) [PDF]

Lawrence A. Cunningham, The New Federal Corporation Law?, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 685 (2009) [PDF]

M. Todd Henderson, Two Visions of Corporate Law, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 708 (2009) [PDF]

Robert B. Ahdieh, The (Misunderstood) Genius of American Corporate Law, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 730 (2009) [PDF]

Christopher Carlberg, Cooperative Noncooperation: A Proposal for an Effective Uniform Noncooperation Immigration Policy for Local Governments, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 730 (2009) [PDF]

Andrew Croner, A Snake in the Grass?: Section 798 of the Espionage Act and Its Constitutionality as Applied to the Press, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 766 (2009) [PDF]

Evan Mayor, The “Bong Hits” Case and Viewpoint Discrimination: A State Law Answer to Protecting Unpopular Student Viewpoints, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 799 (2009) [PDF]

Christopher Meeks, The Pollution Delusion: A Proposal for a Uniform Interpretation of Pollution in General Liability Absolute Pollution Exclusions, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 824 (2009) [PDF]

  May 30, 2009 at 12:11 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:2 (February 2009)

posted by George Washington Law Review

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 77:2 (February 2009)

(Contents of current and past issues are available from our website.)

Articles:

Robert B. Ahdieh, Trapped in a Metaphor: The Limited Implications of Federalism for Corporate Governance, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 255 (2009) [PDF]

Chad M. Oldfather, Universal De Novo Review, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 308 (2009) [PDF]

Todd S. Aagaard, Factual Premises of Statutory Interpretation in Agency Review Cases, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 366 (2009) [PDF]

Notes:

Rachel Frankel, Sharks and Minnows: Using Temporary Alien Deportation Immunity to Catch the Big Fish, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 431 (2009) [PDF]

Rita Glasionov, In Furtherance of Transparency and Litigants’ Rights: Reforming the State Secrets Privilege, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 458 (2009) [PDF]

Megha Shah, Grassroots Enforcement of EISA: The Need for a Citizen Suit Provision in the Energy Independence and Security Act of 2007, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 488 (2009) [PDF]

Ross L. Weiner, The Office of Legal Counsel and Torture: The Law as Both a Sword and Shield, 77 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 524 (2009) [PDF]

  May 15, 2009 at 8:41 am   Posted in: Law Rev (GW)   Print This Post   No Comments

• « Older Entries