<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Law Rev (Georgetown)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/category/law-rev-georgetown/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:51:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 98.1 (November 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/georgetown-law-journal-issue-98-1-november-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/georgetown-law-journal-issue-98-1-november-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 21:00:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Georgetown Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21500</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 98.1 (August 2009)
<p> </p>
<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Taking the Measure of Ideology: Empirically Measuring Supreme Court Cases
</p>
<p>Tonja Jacobi &#38; Matthew Sag</p>
<p>A Pragmatic Defense of Contract Law
</p>
<p>Nathan B. Oman

Rethinking Bivens: Legitimacy and Constitutional Adjudication
</p>
<p>James E. Pfander &#38; David Baltmanis</p>
<p> </p>
<p></p>
<p>Notes</p>

<p>The Liability of Clergy for the Acts of Their Congregants</p>
<p></p>
<p>Mark Herman</p>

<p>Climate Change Litigation: Drawing Lines to Avoid Strict, Joint, and Several Liability
</p>
<p>Kirk Maag</p>

<p>Insuring Fairness: The Popular Creation of Genetic Antidiscrimination</p>
<p>Jeffrey Morrow
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/GLJ-logo.jpg" alt="GLJ-logo.jpg" width="402" height="127" /></p>
<div><strong><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/current/">Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 98.1 (August 2009)</a></strong></div>
<p><strong> </p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/98-1/Jacobi%20&amp;%20Sag.PDF">Taking the Measure of Ideology: Empirically Measuring Supreme Court Cases<br />
</a></p>
<p><em>Tonja Jacobi &amp; Matthew Sag</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/98-1/Oman.PDF">A Pragmatic Defense of Contract Law<br />
</a></p>
<p><em>Nathan B. Oman</em>
<div><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/98-1/Pfander%20&amp;%20Baltmanis.PDF"><br />
Rethinking Bivens: Legitimacy and Constitutional Adjudication<br />
</a></p>
<p><em>James E. Pfander &amp; David Baltmanis</em></p>
<p><strong> </p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<div><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/98-1/Herman.PDF"></a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/98-1/Herman.PDF">The Liability of Clergy for the Acts of Their Congregants</p>
<p></a></p>
<p><em>Mark Herman</em></p>
<div><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/98-1/Maag.PDF"></a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/98-1/Maag.PDF">Climate Change Litigation: Drawing Lines to Avoid Strict, Joint, and Several Liability<br />
</a></p>
<p><em>Kirk Maag</em></p>
<div><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/98-1/Morrow.PDF"></a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/98-1/Morrow.PDF">Insuring Fairness: The Popular Creation of Genetic Antidiscrimination</a></p>
<p><em>Jeffrey Morrow</em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/georgetown-law-journal-issue-98-1-november-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.5 (June 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/georgetown-law-journal-issue-975-june-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/georgetown-law-journal-issue-975-june-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 22:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Georgetown Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=17890</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.5 (June 2009)
<p> </p>
<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>(Still) Not Fit To Be Named: Moving Beyond Race To Explain Why ‘Separate’ Nomenclature for Gay and Straight Relationships Will Never Be ‘Equal’
</p>
<p>Courtney Megan Cahill</p>
<p>A Voice-Based Framework for Evaluating Claims of Minority Shareholder Oppression in the Close Corporation
</p>
<p>Benjamin Means</p>

Judicial Review of Congress Before the Civil War
</p>
<p>Keith E. Whittington</p>
<p>Notes</p>

<p>“That’s a Wrap! (Or Is It?)”: The Unanswered Question of Severability Under California’s Talent Agencies Act After Marathon Entertainment, Inc. v. Blasi</p>
<p></p>
<p>Erick Flores</p>

<p>The Suspension of Intellectual Property Obligations Under TRIPS: A Proposal for Retaliating Against Technology-Exporting Countries in the World Trade Organization
</p>
<p>Gabriel L. Slater</p>

<p>The Least Televised Branch: A Separation of Powers Analysis of Legislation to Televise the Supreme Court</p>
<p>Brandon Smith
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/GLJ-logo.jpg" alt="GLJ-logo.jpg" width="402" height="127" /></p>
<div><strong><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/current/">Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.5 (June 2009)</a></strong></div>
<p><strong> </p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-5/Cahill.PDF">(Still) Not Fit To Be Named: Moving Beyond Race To Explain Why ‘Separate’ Nomenclature for Gay and Straight Relationships Will Never Be ‘Equal’<br />
</a></p>
<p><em>Courtney Megan Cahill</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-5/Means.PDF">A Voice-Based Framework for Evaluating Claims of Minority Shareholder Oppression in the Close Corporation<br />
</a></p>
<p><em>Benjamin Means</em></p>
<div><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-5/Whittington.PDF"><br />
Judicial Review of Congress Before the Civil War<br />
</a></p>
<p><em>Keith E. Whittington</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<div><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-5/Flores.PDF"></a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-5/Flores.PDF">“That’s a Wrap! (Or Is It?)”: The Unanswered Question of Severability Under California’s Talent Agencies Act After Marathon Entertainment, Inc. v. Blasi</p>
<p></a></p>
<p><em>Erick Flores</em></p>
<div><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-5/Slater.PDF"></a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-5/Slater.PDF">The Suspension of Intellectual Property Obligations Under TRIPS: A Proposal for Retaliating Against Technology-Exporting Countries in the World Trade Organization<br />
</a></p>
<p><em>Gabriel L. Slater</em></p>
<div><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-5/BSmith.PDF"></a></div>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-5/BSmith.PDF">The Least Televised Branch: A Separation of Powers Analysis of Legislation to Televise the Supreme Court</a></p>
<p><em>Brandon Smith</em></div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/georgetown-law-journal-issue-975-june-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.4 (April 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/georgetown_law_7.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/georgetown_law_7.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 18:28:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Georgetown Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/04/georgetown-law-journal-issue-974-april-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.4 (April 2009)</p>
<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Government as Educator: A New Understanding of First Amendment Protection of Academic Freedom and Governance</p>
<p>Judith Areen</p>
<p>Torture Nation, Torture Law</p>
<p>John T. Parry</p>
<p></p>
<p>Symbolic Expression and the Original Meaning of the First Amendment</p>
<p>Eugene Volokh</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p></p>
<p>Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts: A Historical Perspective</p>
<p>Daniel R. Kahan</p>
<p></p>
<p>An International Hit Job: Prosecuting Organized Crime Acts as Crimes Against Humanity</p>
<p>Jennifer M. Smith</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="GLJ-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/GLJ-logo.jpg" width="402" height="127" /></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/current/">Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.4 (April 2009)</a></p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-4/Areen.PDF">Government as Educator: A New Understanding of First Amendment Protection of Academic Freedom and Governance</a></p>
<p><em>Judith Areen</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-4/Parry.PDF">Torture Nation, Torture Law</a></p>
<p><em>John T. Parry</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-4/Volokh.PDF"></p>
<p>Symbolic Expression and the Original Meaning of the First Amendment</a></p>
<p><em>Eugene Volokh</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-4/Kahan.PDF"></p>
<p>Shareholder Liability for Corporate Torts: A Historical Perspective</a></p>
<p><em>Daniel R. Kahan</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-4/Smith.PDF"></p>
<p>An International Hit Job: Prosecuting Organized Crime Acts as Crimes Against Humanity</a></p>
<p><em>Jennifer M. Smith</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/georgetown_law_7.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.3 (March 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/georgetown_law_6.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/georgetown_law_6.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 01:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Georgetown Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/03/georgetown-law-journal-issue-973-march-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.3 (March 2009)</p>
<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Selling Originalism</p>
<p>Jamal Greene</p>
<p>A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review</p>
<p>David S. Law</p>
<p>Essay and Responses</p>
<p></p>
<p>Spam Jurisprudence, Air Law, and the Rank Anxiety of Nothing Happening (A Report on the State of the Art)</p>
<p>Pierre Schlag</p>
<p></p>
<p>Get a LIfe?</p>
<p>Daniel R. Ortiz</p>
<p></p>
<p>The State of Legal Scholarship Today (A Comment on Schlag)</p>
<p>Richard A. Posner</p>
<p></p>
<p>Daniel Arises: Notes (Such as 30 and 31) from the Schlagaground</p>
<p>Richard H. Weisberg</p>
<p></p>
<p>A Reply to Pierre</p>
<p>Robin West</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p></p>
<p>Procurement and the Polls: How Sharing Responsibility for Acquiring Voting Machines Can Improve and Restore Confidence in American Voting Systems</p>
<p>Philip J. Peisch</p>
<p></p>
<p>“The Great Equalizer”: Making Sense of the Supreme Court&#8217;s Equal Protection Jurisprudence in American Public Education and Beyond</p>
<p>Matthew Scutari</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="GLJ-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/GLJ-logo.jpg" width="402" height="127" /></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/current/">Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.3 (March 2009)</a></p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-3/Greene.PDF">Selling Originalism</a></p>
<p><em>Jamal Greene</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-3/Law.PDF">A Theory of Judicial Power and Judicial Review</a></p>
<p><em>David S. Law</em></p>
<p><strong>Essay and Responses</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-3/Schlag.PDF"></p>
<p>Spam Jurisprudence, Air Law, and the Rank Anxiety of Nothing Happening (A Report on the State of the Art)</a></p>
<p><em>Pierre Schlag</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-3/Ortiz.PDF"></p>
<p>Get a LIfe?</a></p>
<p><em>Daniel R. Ortiz</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-3/Posner.PDF"></p>
<p>The State of Legal Scholarship Today (A Comment on Schlag)</a></p>
<p><em>Richard A. Posner</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-3/Weisberg.PDF"></p>
<p>Daniel Arises: Notes (Such as 30 and 31) from the Schlagaground</a></p>
<p><em>Richard H. Weisberg</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-3/West.PDF"></p>
<p>A Reply to Pierre</a></p>
<p><em>Robin West</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-3/Peisch.PDF"></p>
<p>Procurement and the Polls: How Sharing Responsibility for Acquiring Voting Machines Can Improve and Restore Confidence in American Voting Systems</a></p>
<p><em>Philip J. Peisch</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-3/Scutari.PDF"></p>
<p>“The Great Equalizer”: Making Sense of the Supreme Court&#8217;s Equal Protection Jurisprudence in American Public Education and Beyond</a></p>
<p><em>Matthew Scutari</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/georgetown_law_6.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.2 (January 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/georgetown_law_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/georgetown_law_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:07:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Georgetown Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/01/georgetown-law-journal-issue-972-january-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.2 (January 2009)</p>
<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Legislative Supremacy in The United States? Rethinking the Enrolled Bill Doctrine</p>
<p>Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov</p>
<p>Substance or Illusion? The Dangers of Imposing a Standing Threshold</p>
<p>Amanda Leiter</p>
<p></p>
<p>The Optimal Relationship Between Taxable Income and Financial Accounting Income: Analysis and a Proposal</p>
<p>Daniel Shaviro</p>
<p></p>
<p>Is Privacy a Woman?</p>
<p>Jeannie Suk</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p></p>
<p>When “Turnabout” Is Not “Fair Play”: Tribal Immunity Under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act</p>
<p>Courtney J. A. DaCosta</p>
<p></p>
<p>When Is a Search Not a Search? When It’s a Quarter: The Third Amendment, Originalism, and NSA Wiretapping</p>
<p>Josh Dugan</p>
<p></p>
<p>A “Margin of Appreciation” for “Marriages of Appreciation”: Reconciling South Asian Adult Arranged Marriages with the Matrimonial Consent Requirement in International Human Rights Law</p>
<p>Prashina J. Gagoomal</p>
<p></p>
<p>Unpublished Opinions: A Convenient Means to an Unconstitutional End</p>
<p>Erica Weisgerber</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="GLJ-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/GLJ-logo.jpg" width="402" height="127" /></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/current/">Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.2 (January 2009)</a></p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/97-2/Bar-Siman-Tov.PDF">Legislative Supremacy in The United States? Rethinking the Enrolled Bill Doctrine</a></p>
<p><em>Ittai Bar-Siman-Tov</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-2/Leiter.PDF">Substance or Illusion? The Dangers of Imposing a Standing Threshold</a></p>
<p><em>Amanda Leiter</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-2/Shaviro.PDF"></p>
<p>The Optimal Relationship Between Taxable Income and Financial Accounting Income: Analysis and a Proposal</a></p>
<p><em>Daniel Shaviro</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-2/Suk.PDF"></p>
<p>Is Privacy a Woman?</a></p>
<p><em>Jeannie Suk</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-2/DaCosta.PDF"></p>
<p>When “Turnabout” Is Not “Fair Play”: Tribal Immunity Under the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act</a></p>
<p><em>Courtney J. A. DaCosta</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-2/Dugan.PDF"></p>
<p>When Is a Search Not a Search? When It’s a Quarter: The Third Amendment, Originalism, and NSA Wiretapping</a></p>
<p><em>Josh Dugan</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-2/Gagoomal.PDF"></p>
<p>A “Margin of Appreciation” for “Marriages of Appreciation”: Reconciling South Asian Adult Arranged Marriages with the Matrimonial Consent Requirement in International Human Rights Law</a></p>
<p><em>Prashina J. Gagoomal</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-2/Weisgerber.PDF"></p>
<p>Unpublished Opinions: A Convenient Means to an Unconstitutional End</a></p>
<p><em>Erica Weisgerber</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/georgetown_law_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.1 (November 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/georgetown_law_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/georgetown_law_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 18:49:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Georgetown Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/09/georgetown-law-journal-issue-971-november-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.1 (November 2008)</p>
<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Risk Governance and Deliberative Democracy in Health Care</p>
<p>Nan D. Hunter</p>
<p>Judicial Review and the Right To Resist</p>
<p>Edward Rubin</p>
<p></p>
<p>Crimen Sine Lege: Judicial Lawmaking at the Intersection of Law and Morals</p>
<p>Beth Van Schaack</p>
<p></p>
<p>Systemic Risk</p>
<p>Steven L. Schwarcz</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p></p>
<p>Preserving the Value of Unanimous Criminal Jury Verdicts in Anti-Deadlock Instructions</p>
<p>Emil J. Bove III</p>
<p></p>
<p>The Elusive Value: Protecting Privacy During Class Action Discovery</p>
<p>Jeff Kosseff</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="GLJ-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/GLJ-logo.jpg" width="402" height="127" /></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/current/">Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 97.1 (November 2008)</a></p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-1/Hunter.PDF">Risk Governance and Deliberative Democracy in Health Care</a></p>
<p><em>Nan D. Hunter</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-1/Rubin.PDF">Judicial Review and the Right To Resist</a></p>
<p><em>Edward Rubin</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-1/VanSchaack.PDF"></p>
<p><em>Crimen Sine Lege</em>: Judicial Lawmaking at the Intersection of Law and Morals</a></p>
<p><em>Beth Van Schaack</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-1/Schwarcz.PDF"></p>
<p>Systemic Risk</a></p>
<p><em>Steven L. Schwarcz</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-1/Bove.PDF"></p>
<p>Preserving the Value of Unanimous Criminal Jury Verdicts in Anti-Deadlock Instructions</a></p>
<p><em>Emil J. Bove III</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/97-1/Kosseff.PDF"></p>
<p>The Elusive Value: Protecting Privacy During Class Action Discovery</a></p>
<p><em>Jeff Kosseff</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/georgetown_law_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96.6 (August 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/08/georgetown_law_4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/08/georgetown_law_4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 18 Aug 2008 20:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Georgetown Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/08/georgetown-law-journal-issue-966-august-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96.6 (August 2008)</p>
<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>The Judgment Power</p>
<p>William Baude</p>
<p>Should Courts Give Stare Decisis Effect to Statutory Interpretation Methodology?</p>
<p>Sydney Foster</p>
<p></p>
<p>Responders&#8217; Responsibility: Liability and Immunity in Public Health Emergencies</p>
<p>Sharona Hoffman</p>
<p></p>
<p>Tabloid Constitutionalism: How a Bill Doesn&#8217;t Become a Law</p>
<p>Brian C. Kalt</p>
<p></p>
<p>The Property Puzzle</p>
<p>Amnon Lehavi</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p></p>
<p>&#8220;The Provision of Material Support and Resources&#8221; and Lawsuits Against State Sponsors of Terrorism</p>
<p>Michael T. Kotlarczyk</p>
<p></p>
<p>Taking the Temple: Eminent Domain and the Limits of RLUIPA</p>
<p>Daniel N. Lerman</p>
<p></p>
<p>Gods &#038; Gays: Analyzing the Same-Sex Marriage Debate from a Religious Perspective</p>
<p>Ben Schuman</p>
<p></p>
<p>Expanding Expanded Access: How the Food and Drug Administration Can Achieve Better Access to Experimental Drugs for Seriously Ill Patients</p>
<p>Judy Vale</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="GLJ-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/GLJ-logo.jpg" width="402" height="127" /></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/current/">Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96.6 (August 2008)</a></p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-6/Baude.PDF">The Judgment Power</a></p>
<p><em>William Baude</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-6/Foster.PDF">Should Courts Give Stare Decisis Effect to Statutory Interpretation Methodology?</a></p>
<p><em>Sydney Foster</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-6/Hoffman.PDF"></p>
<p>Responders&#8217; Responsibility: Liability and Immunity in Public Health Emergencies</a></p>
<p><em>Sharona Hoffman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-6/Kalt.PDF"></p>
<p>Tabloid Constitutionalism: How a Bill Doesn&#8217;t Become a Law</a></p>
<p><em>Brian C. Kalt</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-6/Lehavi.PDF"></p>
<p>The Property Puzzle</a></p>
<p><em>Amnon Lehavi</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-6/Kotlarczyk.PDF"></p>
<p>&#8220;The Provision of Material Support and Resources&#8221; and Lawsuits Against State Sponsors of Terrorism</a></p>
<p><em>Michael T. Kotlarczyk</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-6/Lerman.PDF"></p>
<p>Taking the Temple: Eminent Domain and the Limits of RLUIPA</a></p>
<p><em>Daniel N. Lerman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-6/Schuman.PDF"></p>
<p>Gods &#038; Gays: Analyzing the Same-Sex Marriage Debate from a Religious Perspective</a></p>
<p><em>Ben Schuman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-6/Vale.PDF"></p>
<p>Expanding Expanded Access: How the Food and Drug Administration Can Achieve Better Access to Experimental Drugs for Seriously Ill Patients</a></p>
<p><em>Judy Vale</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/08/georgetown_law_4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96.5 (June 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/06/georgetown_law_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/06/georgetown_law_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Jun 2008 19:15:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Georgetown Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/06/georgetown-law-journal-issue-965-june-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96.5 (June 2008)</p>
<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>The Antidomination Model and the Judicial Oversight of Democracy</p>
<p>Yasmin Dawood</p>
<p>Advocacy Matters Before and Within the Supreme Court: Transforming the Court by Transforming the Bar</p>
<p>Richard J. Lazarus</p>
<p></p>
<p>Climate Change Justice</p>
<p>Eric A. Posner &#038; Cass R. Sunstein</p>
<p></p>
<p>The Executive&#8217;s Duty To Disregard Unconstitutional Laws</p>
<p>Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p></p>
<p>Zero to Life: Sentencing Appeals at the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda</p>
<p>Jennifer J. Clark</p>
<p></p>
<p>Hamlet Was a Law Student: A &#8220;Dramatic&#8221; Look at Emotion&#8217;s Effect on Analogical Reasoning</p>
<p>Jonathan Uffelman</p>
<p></p>
<p>How Self-Restriction Laws Can Influence Societal Norms and Address Problems of Bounded Rationality</p>
<p>Cecil VanDevender</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="GLJ-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/GLJ-logo.jpg" width="402" height="127" /></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/current/">Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96.5 (June 2008)</a></p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-5/Dawood.PDF">The Antidomination Model and the Judicial Oversight of Democracy</a></p>
<p><em>Yasmin Dawood</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-5/Lazarus.PDF">Advocacy Matters Before and Within the Supreme Court: Transforming the Court by Transforming the Bar</a></p>
<p><em>Richard J. Lazarus</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-5/Posner-Sunstein.PDF"></p>
<p>Climate Change Justice</a></p>
<p><em>Eric A. Posner &#038; Cass R. Sunstein</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-5/Prakash.PDF"></p>
<p>The Executive&#8217;s Duty To Disregard Unconstitutional Laws</a></p>
<p><em>Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-5/Clark.PDF"></p>
<p>Zero to Life: Sentencing Appeals at the International Criminal Tribunals for the Former Yugoslavia and Rwanda</a></p>
<p><em>Jennifer J. Clark</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-5/Uffelman.PDF"></p>
<p>Hamlet Was a Law Student: A &#8220;Dramatic&#8221; Look at Emotion&#8217;s Effect on Analogical Reasoning</a></p>
<p><em>Jonathan Uffelman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-5/VanDevender.PDF"></p>
<p>How Self-Restriction Laws Can Influence Societal Norms and Address Problems of Bounded Rationality</a></p>
<p><em>Cecil VanDevender</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/06/georgetown_law_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96.4 (April 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/georgetown_law_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/georgetown_law_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 19:30:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Georgetown Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/04/georgetown-law-journal-issue-964-april-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96.4 (April 2008)</p>
<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>The Continuum of Deference: Supreme Court Treatment of Agency Statutory Interpretations from Chevron to Hamdan</p>
<p>William N. Eskridge &#038; Lauren E. Baer</p>
<p>The Hanging Chads of Corporate Voting</p>
<p>Marcel Kahan &#038; Edward Rock</p>
<p></p>
<p>Writing, Cognition, and the Nature of the Judicial Function</p>
<p>Chad M. Oldfather</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p></p>
<p>When Clarity Means Ambiguity: An Examination of Statutory Interpretation at the Environmental Protection Agency</p>
<p>Susannah Landes Foster</p>
<p></p>
<p>Hearsay at Guantanamo: A &#8220;Fundamental Value Determination&#8221;</p>
<p>Martin A. Hewett</p>
<p>The dataset for Eskridge &#038; Baer&#8217;s The Continuum of Deference is available here.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="GLJ-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/GLJ-logo.jpg" width="402" height="127" /></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/current/">Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96.4 (April 2008)</a></p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-4/Eskridge-Baer.PDF">The Continuum of Deference: Supreme Court Treatment of Agency Statutory Interpretations from <em>Chevron</em> to <em>Hamdan</em></a></p>
<p><em>William N. Eskridge &#038; Lauren E. Baer</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-4/Kahan-Rock.PDF">The Hanging Chads of Corporate Voting</a></p>
<p><em>Marcel Kahan &#038; Edward Rock</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-4/Oldfather.PDF"></p>
<p>Writing, Cognition, and the Nature of the Judicial Function</a></p>
<p><em>Chad M. Oldfather</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-4/Foster.PDF"></p>
<p>When Clarity Means Ambiguity: An Examination of Statutory Interpretation at the Environmental Protection Agency</a></p>
<p><em>Susannah Landes Foster</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/issues/pdf/96-4/Hewett.PDF"></p>
<p>Hearsay at Guantanamo: A &#8220;Fundamental Value Determination&#8221;</a></p>
<p><em>Martin A. Hewett</em></p>
<p>The dataset for Eskridge &#038; Baer&#8217;s <em>The Continuum of Deference</em> is available <a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.com/extras/96.4">here</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/georgetown_law_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96.3 (March 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/georgetown_law.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/georgetown_law.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 17:53:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Georgetown Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/georgetown-law-journal-issue-963-march-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96.3 (March 2008)</p>
<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Confronting Evil: Victims&#8217; Rights in an Age of Terror</p>
<p>Wayne A. Logan</p>
<p>The Private Enforcement of Immigration Laws</p>
<p>Huyen Pham</p>
<p></p>
<p>Triangulating Testimonial Hearsay: The Constitutional Boundaries of Expert Opinion Testimony</p>
<p>Julie E. Seaman</p>
<p>The New Servitudes</p>
<p>Molly Shaffer Van Houweling</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p></p>
<p>Stitching Together the Patchwork: Burlington Northern&#8217;s Lessons for State Whistleblower Law</p>
<p>Courtney J. Anderson DaCosta</p>
<p>Burlamaqui, the Constitution, and the Imperfect War on Terror</p>
<p>Kathryn L. Einspanier</p>
<p></p>
<p>Discriminatory Condemnations and the Fair Housing Act</p>
<p>Edward Imperatore</p>
<p>From Georgia v. Tennessee to Massachusetts v. EPA: Parens Patriae Standing for State Global Warming Plaintiffs</p>
<p>Sara Zdeb</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="GLJ-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/GLJ-logo.jpg" width="402" height="127" /></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/current/">Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96.3 (March 2008)</a></p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-3/Logan.PDF">Confronting Evil: Victims&#8217; Rights in an Age of Terror</a></p>
<p><em>Wayne A. Logan</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-3/Pham.PDF">The Private Enforcement of Immigration Laws</a></p>
<p><em>Huyen Pham</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-3/Seaman.PDF"></p>
<p>Triangulating Testimonial Hearsay: The Constitutional Boundaries of Expert Opinion Testimony</a></p>
<p><em>Julie E. Seaman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-3/VanHouweling.PDF">The New Servitudes</a></p>
<p><em>Molly Shaffer Van Houweling</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-3/DaCosta.PDF"></p>
<p>Stitching Together the Patchwork: <em>Burlington Northern</em>&#8217;s Lessons for State Whistleblower Law</p>
<p></a><em>Courtney J. Anderson DaCosta</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-3/Einspanier.PDF">Burlamaqui, the Constitution, and the Imperfect War on Terror</a></p>
<p><em>Kathryn L. Einspanier</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-3/Imperatore.PDF"></p>
<p>Discriminatory Condemnations and the Fair Housing Act</a></p>
<p><em>Edward Imperatore</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-3/Zdeb.PDF">From<em> Georgia v. Tennessee</em> to<em> Massachusetts v. EPA</em>: <em>Parens Patriae </em>Standing for State Global Warming Plaintiffs</a></p>
<p><em>Sara Zdeb</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/georgetown_law.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96:2 (January 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/02/the_georgetown_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/02/the_georgetown_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Feb 2008 00:47:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Georgetown Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/02/the-georgetown-law-journal-issue-962-january-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>The Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96:2 (January 2008)</p>
<p>Symposium:  The O&#8217;Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law</p>
<p>Foreword:  National and Global Health Law:  A Scholarly Examination of the Most Pressing Health Hazards</p>
<p>Lawrence O. Gostin</p>
<p>GLOBAL HEALTH</p>
<p>Meeting Basic Survival Needs of the World&#8217;s Least Healthy People:  Toward a Framework Convention on Global Health</p>
<p>Lawrence O. Gostin</p>
<p>Global Health Jurisprudence:  A Time of Reckoning</p>
<p>David P. Fidler</p>
<p>Global Health Care Financing Law:  A Useful Concept?</p>
<p>Timothy Stoltzfus Jost</p>
<p>Normative Foundations of Global Health Law</p>
<p>Jennifer Prah Ruger</p>
<p>HEALTH REGULATION AND GOVERNANCE</p>
<p>Climate Change, Human Health, and the Post-Cautionary Principle</p>
<p>Lisa Heinzerling</p>
<p>A Critical Examination of the FDA&#8217;s Efforts To Preempt Failure-To-Warn Claims</p>
<p>David A. Kessler &#038; David C. Vladeck</p>
<p>Relational Duties, Regulatory Duties, and the Widening Gap Between Individual Health Law and Collective Health Policy</p>
<p>William M. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="GLJ-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/GLJ-logo.jpg" width="402" height="127" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/current/">The Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96:2 (January 2008)</a></p>
<p><strong>Symposium:  The O&#8217;Neill Institute for National and Global Health Law</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Gostin-Foreword.PDF">Foreword:  National and Global Health Law:  A Scholarly Examination of the Most Pressing Health Hazards</a></p>
<p><em>Lawrence O. Gostin</em></p>
<p>GLOBAL HEALTH</p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Gostin-Article.PDF">Meeting Basic Survival Needs of the World&#8217;s Least Healthy People:  Toward a Framework Convention on Global Health</a></p>
<p><em>Lawrence O. Gostin</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Fidler.PDF">Global Health Jurisprudence:  A Time of Reckoning</a></p>
<p><em>David P. Fidler</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Jost.PDF">Global Health Care Financing Law:  A Useful Concept?</a></p>
<p><em>Timothy Stoltzfus Jost</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/PrahRuger.PDF">Normative Foundations of Global Health Law</a></p>
<p><em>Jennifer Prah Ruger</em></p>
<p>HEALTH REGULATION AND GOVERNANCE</p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Heinzerling.PDF">Climate Change, Human Health, and the Post-Cautionary Principle</a></p>
<p><em>Lisa Heinzerling</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Kessler&#038;Vladeck.PDF">A Critical Examination of the FDA&#8217;s Efforts To Preempt Failure-To-Warn Claims</a></p>
<p><em>David A. Kessler &#038; David C. Vladeck</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Sage.PDF">Relational Duties, Regulatory Duties, and the Widening Gap Between Individual Health Law and Collective Health Policy</a></p>
<p><em>William M. Sage</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Westmoreland.PDF">Can We Get There from Here?  Universal Health Insurance and the Congressional Budget Process</a></p>
<p><em>Tim Westmoreland</em></p>
<p>HEALTH CARE FINANCING AND ORGANIZATION</p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Aaron.PDF">Health Care Rationing:  Inevitable but Impossible?</a></p>
<p><em>Henry J. Aaron</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Epstein.PDF">The Erosion of Individual Autonomy in Medical Decisionmaking:  Of the FDA and IRBs</a></p>
<p><em>Richard A. Epstein</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Hall.PDF">The Legal and Historical Foundations of Patients as Medical Consumers</a></p>
<p><em>Mark A. Hall</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Mello&#038;Studdert.PDF">Deconstructing Negligence:  The Role of Individual and System Factors in Causing Medical Injuries</a></p>
<p><em>Michelle M. Mello &#038; David M. Studdert</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/TheodoreRuger.PDF">Health Law&#8217;s Coherence Anxiety</a></p>
<p><em>Theodore W. Ruger</em></p>
<p>DISEASE PREVENTION AND HEALTH OUTCOMES</p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Mello&#038;Zeiler.PDF">Empirical Health Law Scholarship:  The State of the Field</a></p>
<p><em>Michelle M. Mello &#038; Kathryn Zeiler</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-2/Stoto.PDF">Public Health Surveillance in the Twenty-First Century:  Achieving Population Health Goals While Protecting Individuals&#8217; Privacy and Confidentiality</a></p>
<p><em>Michael A. Stoto</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/02/the_georgetown_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96:1 (October 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/the_georgetown.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/the_georgetown.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Nov 2007 20:20:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Georgetown Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/11/the-georgetown-law-journal-issue-961-october-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>The Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96:1 (October 2007)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>School Naming Rights and the First Amendment&#8217;s Perfect Storm</p>
<p>Joseph Blocher</p>
<p>The One Court That Congress Cannot Take Away: Singularity, Supremacy, and Article III</p>
<p>Laurence Claus</p>
<p>Privacy&#8217;s Other Path: Recovering the Law of Confidentiality</p>
<p>Neil M. Richards &#038; Daniel J. Solove</p>
<p>Witchcraft and Statecraft: Liberal Democracy in Africa</p>
<p>Nelson Tebbe</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>The Ties That Bind: The Constitution, Structural Restraints, and Government Action Overseas</p>
<p>Jessica Powley Hayden</p>
<p>A More Reliable Right To Present a Defense: The Compulsory Process Clause After Crawford v. Washington</p>
<p>Martin A. Hewett</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="GLJ-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/GLJ-logo.jpg" width="402" height="127" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/current/">The Georgetown Law Journal, Issue 96:1 (October 2007)</a></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-1/Blocher.PDF">School Naming Rights and the First Amendment&#8217;s Perfect Storm</a></p>
<p><em>Joseph Blocher</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-1/Claus.PDF">The One Court That Congress Cannot Take Away: Singularity, Supremacy, and Article III</a></p>
<p><em>Laurence Claus</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-1/Richards%20&#038;%20Solove%20-%20REVISED.PDF">Privacy&#8217;s Other Path: Recovering the Law of Confidentiality</a></p>
<p><em>Neil M. Richards &#038; Daniel J. Solove</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-1/Tebbe.PDF">Witchcraft and Statecraft: Liberal Democracy in Africa</a></p>
<p><em>Nelson Tebbe</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-1/Hayden.PDF">The Ties That Bind: The Constitution, Structural Restraints, and Government Action Overseas</a></p>
<p><em>Jessica Powley Hayden</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.georgetownlawjournal.org/issues/pdf/96-1/Hewett.PDF">A More Reliable Right To Present a Defense: The Compulsory Process Clause After <em>Crawford v. Washington</em></a></p>
<p><em>Martin A. Hewett</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/the_georgetown.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/announcing_the_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/announcing_the_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Solove</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Chicago)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Columbia)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (GW)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Harvard)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Indiana)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Michigan)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Minnesota)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Northwestern)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Notre Dame)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (S Cal)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Stanford)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Texas)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Vanderbilt)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Virginia)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Yale)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/11/announcing-the-law-review-table-of-contents-project.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project.  We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.</p>
<p>The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool.  Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult.  If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published.  Now you don’t have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="table-of-contents1.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/table-of-contents1.jpg" width="379" height="293" ></p>
<p>I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the <a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/law_rev_contents/">Law Review Table of Contents Project</a>.  We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.</p>
<p>The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool.  Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult.  If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published.  Now you don’t have to.   Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!</p>
<p>Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called <a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/law_rev_contents/">Law Rev Contents</a> – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.</p>
<p>Participating law reviews thus far include:</p>
<p>* Boston College</p>
<p>* Chicago</p>
<p>* Columbia</p>
<p>* Cornell</p>
<p>* Duke</p>
<p>* Emory</p>
<p>* Fordham</p>
<p>* Georgetown</p>
<p>* GW</p>
<p>* Harvard</p>
<p>* Indiana</p>
<p>* Michigan</p>
<p>* Minnesota</p>
<p>* NYU</p>
<p>* Northwestern</p>
<p>* Notre Dame</p>
<p>* Southern California</p>
<p>* Stanford</p>
<p>* Texas</p>
<p>* UCLA</p>
<p>* Vanderbilt</p>
<p>* Virginia</p>
<p>* Washington University</p>
<p>* Yale</p>
<p>We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.</p>
<p>We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful.  We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/announcing_the_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
