Concurring Opinions » Law Rev (Emory)

Emory Law Journal 58:4 (2009)

Emory Law Journal — Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:52:29 +0000

Emory Law Journal, 58:4 (2009)

Articles

Jonathan Remy Nash, The Majority That Wasn’t: Stare Decisis, Majority Rule, and the Mischief of Quorum Requirements, 58 EMORY L.J. 831 (2009)

Peter Lee, Contracting to Preserve Open Science: Consideration-Based Regulation in Patent Law, 58 EMORY L.J. 889 (2009)

Comments

Jennifer E. Fairbairn, Keeping Grable Slim: Federal Question Jurisdiction and the Centrality Test, 58 EMORY L.J. 977 (2009)

Michael P. Jungman, You’ve Got Libel: How the CAN-SPAM Act Delivers Defamation Liability to Spam-Fighters and Why the First Amendment Should Delete the Problem, 58 EMORY L.J. 1013 (2009)

Emory Law Journal 58:3 (2009)

Emory Law Journal — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:48:01 +0000

Emory Law Journal, 58:3 (2009)

Article

Frederick Mark Gedicks, An Originalist Defense of Substantive Due Process: Magna Carta, Higher-Law Constitutionalism, and the Fifth Amendment, 58 EMORY L.J. 585 (2009)

Essays

Jeremy Waldron, Can There Be a Democratic Jurisprudence?, 58 EMORY L.J. 675 (2009)

Marcel Kahan & Edward Rock, How To Prevent Hard Cases from Making Bad Law: Bear Stearns, Delaware, and the Strategic Use of Comity, 58 EMORY L.J. 713 (2009)

Comments

Margaret J. Kochuba, Public Health vs. Patient Rights: Reconciling Informed Consent with HPV Vaccination, 58 EMORY L.J. 761 (2009)

Sean Jessee, Fulfilling the Promise of the Medicaid Act: Why the Equal Access Clause Creates Privately Enforceable Rights, 58 EMORY L.J. 791 (2009)

Emory Law Journal 58:2 (2008)

Emory Law Journal — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:41:54 +0000

Emory Law Journal, 58:2 (2008)

The 2008 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium — Legal Science: An Interdisciplinary Examination of the Use and Misuse of Science in the Law

Thomas O. McGarity, Corporate Accountability for Scientific Fraud: Ketek and the Perils of Aggressive Agency Preemption, 58 EMORY L.J. 287 (2008)

Katherine L. Gross & Gary G. Mittelbach, What Maintains the Integrity of Science: An Essay for Nonscientists, 58 EMORY L.J. 341 (2008)

Joni Hersch, Skin Color Discrimination and Immigrant Pay, 58 EMORY L.J. 357 (2008)

David E. Adelman, The Challenge of Abrupt Climate Change for U.S. Environmental Regulation, 58 EMORY L.J. 379 (2008)

Lisa Heinzerling, Thrower Keynote Address: The Role of Science in Massachusetts v. EPA, 58 EMORY L.J. 411 (2008)

William H. Schlesinger, An Ecologist’s Thoughts on Forests and Farms in a Cap-and-Trade System, 58 EMORY L.J. 423 (2008)

Julie A. Seaman, Black Boxes, 58 EMORY L.J. 427 (2008)

Erin Murphy, The Art in the Science of DNA: A Layperson’s Guide to the Subjectivity Inherent in Forensic DNA Typing, 58 EMORY L.J. 489 (2008)

Comments

John P. Figura, You’re in the Army Now: Borrowed Servants, Dual Servants, and Torts Committed by Contractors’ Employees in the Theaters of U.S. Military Operations, 58 EMORY L.J. 513 (2008)

Gabrielle Marie D’Adamo, Separatism in the Age of Public School Choice: A Constitutional Analysis, 58 EMORY L.J. 547 (2008)

Emory Law Journal 58:1 (2008)

Emory Law Journal — Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:17:49 +0000

Emory Law Journal, 58:1 (2008)

The Future of Law, Religion, and the Family: A 25th Anniversary Symposium Sponsored by the Center for the Study of Law and Religion

Leah Ward Sears, Foreword: The Frontiers of Law, Religion, and Marriage, 58 EMORY L.J. 1 (2008)

Enola G. Aird, Toward a Renaissance for the African-American Family: Confronting the Lie of Black Inferiority, 58 EMORY L.J. 7 (2008)

Stephen L. Carter, Religion, Education, and the Primacy of the Family, 58 EMORY L.J. 23 (2008)

Don S. Browning, Modern Law and Christian Jurisprudence on Marriage and Family, 58 EMORY L.J. 31 (2008)

Margaret F. Brinig, Children’s Beliefs and Family Law, 58 EMORY L.J. 55 (2008)

Jean Bethke Elshtain, “There Oughta Be a Law”—Not Necessarily, 58 EMORY L.J. 71 (2008)

John Witte, Jr., Afterword: Exploring the Frontiers of Law, Religion, and Family Life, 58 EMORY L.J. 87 (2008)

Article & Essay

Alexandra B. Klass & Elizabeth J. Wilson, Climate Change and Carbon Sequestration: Assessing a Liability Regime for Long-Term Storage of Carbon Dioxide, 58 EMORY L.J. 103 (2008)

Mark A. Lemley & Bhaven Sampat, Is the Patent Office a Rubber Stamp?, 58 EMORY L.J. 181 (2008)

Comments

Michael L. Eber, When the Dissent Creates the Law: Cross-Cutting Majorities and the Prediction Model of Precedent, 58 EMORY L.J. 207 (2008)

Erin E. Patrick, Lose Weight or Lose Out: The Legality of State Medicaid Programs That Make Overweight Beneficiaries’ Receipt of Funds Contingent Upon Health Lifestyle Choices, 58 EMORY L.J. 249 (2008)

Emory Law Journal 57:6 (2008)

Emory Law Journal — Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:13:19 +0000

Emory Law Journal, 57:6 (2008)

IN PRAISE OF A LEGAL POLYMATH: A SPECIAL ISSUE DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF HAROLD J. BERMAN (1918-2007)

Including tributes by Frank S. Alexander, David J. Bederman, Michael J. Broyde, William E. Butler, W. Cole Durham, Jr., Edward McGlynn Gaffney, Jr., Peter Hay, John T. Noonan, Jr., Boris Ossipian, Michael Perry, John Quigley, Yuri Senokosov, David Sun, Detlev F. Vagts, Tibor Varady, Lloyd W. Weinreb, John Witte, Jr., and Reinhard Zimmermann.

Articles

David A. Skeel, Jr., The Unbearable Lightness of Christian Legal Scholarship, 57 EMORY L.J. 1471 (2008).

John Witte, Jr., Prophets, Priests, and Kings: John Milton and the Reformation of Rights and Liberties in England, 57 EMORY L.J. 1527 (2008).

Comment

Eric R. Swibel, Churches and Campaign Intervention: Why the Tax Man is Right and How Congress Can Improve His Reputation, 57 EMORY L.J. 1605 (2008).

Emory Law Journal 57:5 (2008)

Emory Law Journal — Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:39:44 +0000

Emory Law Journal, 57:5 (2008)

Articles

Adam Benforado & Jon Hanson, Legal Academic Backlash: The Response of Legal Theorists to Situationist Insights, 57 EMORY L.J. 1087 (2008).

Janet Koven Levit, Bottom-Up Lawmaking Through a Pluralist Lens:The ICC Banking Commission and the Transnational Regulation of Letters of Credit, 57 EMORY L.J. 1147 (2008).

Essay

Frank B. Cross, Thomas A. Smith & Antonio Tomarchio, The Reagan Revolution in the Network of Law, 57 EMORY L.J. 1227 (2008).

Comments

Sarah Tope Reise, “Just Say No” to Pro-Drug and Alcohol Student Speech: The Constitutionality of School Prohibitions of Student Speech Promoting Drug and Alcohol Use, 57 EMORY L.J. 1259 (2008).

Andrea Vanina Arias, Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Swords and Armor: Regulating the Theft of Virtual Goods, 57 EMORY L.J. 1301 (2008).

Amber Leigh Bagley, An Era of Human Zoning: Banishing Sex Offenders from Communities Through Residence and Work Restrictions, 57 EMORY L.J. 1347 (2008).

Emory Law Journal 57:4 (2008)

Emory Law Journal — Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:33:52 +0000

Emory Law Journal, 57:4 (2008)

Articles

Thomas A. Piraino, Jr., The Antitrust Analysis of Joint Ventures after the Supreme Court’s Daugher Decision, 57 EMORY L.J. 735 (2008).

Frederick Tung, The New Death of Contract: Creeping Corporate Fiduciary Duties for Creditors, 57 EMORY L.J. 809 (2008).

DEBATE: Saving the World with Corporate Law?

Kent Greenfield, Proposition: Saving the World with Corporate Law, 57 EMORY L.J. 948 (2008).

D. Gordon Smith, Response: The Dystopian Potential of Corporate Law, 57 EMORY L.J. 985 (2008).

Comments

Jordon T. Stringer, Criminalizing Voter Suppression: The Necessity of Restoring Legitimacy in Federal Elections and Reversing Disillusionment in Minority Communities, 57 EMORY L.J. 1011 (2008).

Elisabeth Bassett, Reform Through Exposure, 57 EMORY L.J. 1049 (2008).

Emory Law Journal 57:3 (2008)

Emory Law Journal — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:35:00 +0000

Emory Law Journal, 57:3 (2008)

Articles

Adam Benforado & Jon Hanson, Naive Cynicism: Maintaining False Perceptions in Policy Debates, 57 EMORY L.J. 499 (2008).

Thomas R. Lee, Glenn L. Christensen & Eric D. DeRosia, Trademarks, Consumer Psychology, and the Sophisticated Consumer, 57 EMORY L.J. 575 (2008).

Comments

Juhi Kaveeshvar, Kicking the Rock & the Hard Place to the Curb: An Alternative and Integrated Approach to Suicidal Students in Higher Education, 57 EMORY L.J. 651 (2008).

Carlissa R. Carson, The Military Commissions Act of 2006: How its Inability to Curb Abusive Interrogations Threatens the Future Treatment of Detainees and the United States Reputation, 57 EMORY L.J. 695 (2008).

Emory Law Journal, 57:2 (2008)

Emory Law Journal — Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:25:00 +0000

Emory Law Journal, 57:2 (2008)

Articles

Adam Benforado & Jon Hanson, The Great Attributional Divide: How Divergent Views of Human Behavior are Shaping Legal Policy, 57 EMORY L.J. 311 (2008).

Barak Y. Orbach, Indirect Free Riding on the Wheels of Commerce: Dual-Use Technologies and Copyright Liability, 57 EMORY L.J. 409 (2008).

Comment

C. Jordan Myers, Learning to Live with Jones v. Flowers: A “New Wrinkle” For an Old Standard, 57 EMORY L.J. 463 (2008).

Emory Law Journal, 57:1 (December 2007)

Emory Law Journal — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:11:49 +0000

Emory Law Journal, 57:1 (December 2007)

The 2007 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium — The New Federalism: Plural Governance in a Decentered World

Robert B. Ahdieh, From Federalism to Intersystemic Governance: The Changing Nature of Modern Jurisdiction, 57 EMORY L.J. 1 (2007)

Articles & Essays

Judith Resnik, Foreign as Domestic Affairs: Rethinking Horizontal Federalism and Foreign Affairs Preemption in Light of Translocal Internationalism, 57 EMORY L.J. 31 (2007)

Ernest A. Young, Toward a Framework Statute for Supranational Adjudication, 57 EMORY L.J. 93 (2007)

Robert A. Schapiro, Federalism as Intersystemic Governance: Legitimacy in a Post-Westphalian World, 57 EMORY L.J. 115 (2007)

Mark Tushnet, Judicial Enforcement of Federalist-Based Constitutional Limitations: Some Skeptical Comparative Observations, 57 EMORY L.J. 135 (2007)

William W. Buzbee, Interaction’s Promise: Preemption Policy Shifts, Risk Regulation, and Experimentalism Lessons, 57 EMORY L.J. 146 (2007)

Charles H. Koch, Jr., The Devolution of Implementing Policymaking in Network Governments, 57 EMORY L.J. 167 (2007)

David J. Bederman, Diversity and Permeability in Transnational Governance, 57 EMORY L.J. 201 (2007)

Robert B. Ahdieh, From Federal Rules to Intersystemic Governance in Securities Regulation, 57 EMORY L.J. 233 (2007)

Comments

Jessica Leigh Rosenthal, The Interactive Process Disabled: Improving ADA and Strengthening the EEOC Through the Adoption of the Interactive Process, 57 EMORY L.J. 247 (2007)

Holly M. Sharp, The Day the Music Died: How Overly Extended Copyright Terms Threaten the Very Existence of Our Nation’s Earliest Musical Works, 57 EMORY L.J. 279 (2007)

Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project

Daniel Solove — Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:10:48 +0000

I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.

The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!

Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.

Participating law reviews thus far include:

* Boston College

* Chicago

* Columbia

* Cornell

* Duke

* Emory

* Fordham

* Georgetown

* GW

* Harvard

* Indiana

* Michigan

* Minnesota

* NYU

* Northwestern

* Notre Dame

* Southern California

* Stanford

* Texas

* UCLA

* Vanderbilt

* Virginia

* Washington University

* Yale

We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.

We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.