Archive for the ‘Law Rev (Emory)’ Category
Emory Law Journal 58:4 (2009)
posted by Emory Law Journal
Emory Law Journal, 58:4 (2009)
Articles
Jonathan Remy Nash, The Majority That Wasn’t: Stare Decisis, Majority Rule, and the Mischief of Quorum Requirements, 58 EMORY L.J. 831 (2009)
Peter Lee, Contracting to Preserve Open Science: Consideration-Based Regulation in Patent Law, 58 EMORY L.J. 889 (2009)
Comments
Jennifer E. Fairbairn, Keeping Grable Slim: Federal Question Jurisdiction and the Centrality Test, 58 EMORY L.J. 977 (2009)
Michael P. Jungman, You’ve Got Libel: How the CAN-SPAM Act Delivers Defamation Liability to Spam-Fighters and Why the First Amendment Should Delete the Problem, 58 EMORY L.J. 1013 (2009)
April 2, 2009 at 8:52 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Emory)
Print This Post
No Comments
Emory Law Journal 58:3 (2009)
posted by Emory Law Journal
Emory Law Journal, 58:3 (2009)
Article
Frederick Mark Gedicks, An Originalist Defense of Substantive Due Process: Magna Carta, Higher-Law Constitutionalism, and the Fifth Amendment, 58 EMORY L.J. 585 (2009)
Essays
Jeremy Waldron, Can There Be a Democratic Jurisprudence?, 58 EMORY L.J. 675 (2009)
Marcel Kahan & Edward Rock, How To Prevent Hard Cases from Making Bad Law: Bear Stearns, Delaware, and the Strategic Use of Comity, 58 EMORY L.J. 713 (2009)
Comments
Margaret J. Kochuba, Public Health vs. Patient Rights: Reconciling Informed Consent with HPV Vaccination, 58 EMORY L.J. 761 (2009)
Sean Jessee, Fulfilling the Promise of the Medicaid Act: Why the Equal Access Clause Creates Privately Enforceable Rights, 58 EMORY L.J. 791 (2009)
March 19, 2009 at 7:48 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Emory)
Print This Post
No Comments
Emory Law Journal 58:2 (2008)
posted by Emory Law Journal
Emory Law Journal, 58:2 (2008)
The 2008 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium — Legal Science: An Interdisciplinary Examination of the Use and Misuse of Science in the Law
Thomas O. McGarity, Corporate Accountability for Scientific Fraud: Ketek and the Perils of Aggressive Agency Preemption, 58 EMORY L.J. 287 (2008)
Katherine L. Gross & Gary G. Mittelbach, What Maintains the Integrity of Science: An Essay for Nonscientists, 58 EMORY L.J. 341 (2008)
Joni Hersch, Skin Color Discrimination and Immigrant Pay, 58 EMORY L.J. 357 (2008)
David E. Adelman, The Challenge of Abrupt Climate Change for U.S. Environmental Regulation, 58 EMORY L.J. 379 (2008)
Lisa Heinzerling, Thrower Keynote Address: The Role of Science in Massachusetts v. EPA, 58 EMORY L.J. 411 (2008)
William H. Schlesinger, An Ecologist’s Thoughts on Forests and Farms in a Cap-and-Trade System, 58 EMORY L.J. 423 (2008)
Julie A. Seaman, Black Boxes, 58 EMORY L.J. 427 (2008)
Erin Murphy, The Art in the Science of DNA: A Layperson’s Guide to the Subjectivity Inherent in Forensic DNA Typing, 58 EMORY L.J. 489 (2008)
Comments
John P. Figura, You’re in the Army Now: Borrowed Servants, Dual Servants, and Torts Committed by Contractors’ Employees in the Theaters of U.S. Military Operations, 58 EMORY L.J. 513 (2008)
Gabrielle Marie D’Adamo, Separatism in the Age of Public School Choice: A Constitutional Analysis, 58 EMORY L.J. 547 (2008)
January 27, 2009 at 8:41 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Emory)
Print This Post
No Comments
Emory Law Journal 58:1 (2008)
posted by Emory Law Journal
Emory Law Journal, 58:1 (2008)
The Future of Law, Religion, and the Family: A 25th Anniversary Symposium Sponsored by the Center for the Study of Law and Religion
Leah Ward Sears, Foreword: The Frontiers of Law, Religion, and Marriage, 58 EMORY L.J. 1 (2008)
Enola G. Aird, Toward a Renaissance for the African-American Family: Confronting the Lie of Black Inferiority, 58 EMORY L.J. 7 (2008)
Stephen L. Carter, Religion, Education, and the Primacy of the Family, 58 EMORY L.J. 23 (2008)
Don S. Browning, Modern Law and Christian Jurisprudence on Marriage and Family, 58 EMORY L.J. 31 (2008)
Margaret F. Brinig, Children’s Beliefs and Family Law, 58 EMORY L.J. 55 (2008)
Jean Bethke Elshtain, “There Oughta Be a Law”—Not Necessarily, 58 EMORY L.J. 71 (2008)
John Witte, Jr., Afterword: Exploring the Frontiers of Law, Religion, and Family Life, 58 EMORY L.J. 87 (2008)
Article & Essay
Alexandra B. Klass & Elizabeth J. Wilson, Climate Change and Carbon Sequestration: Assessing a Liability Regime for Long-Term Storage of Carbon Dioxide, 58 EMORY L.J. 103 (2008)
Mark A. Lemley & Bhaven Sampat, Is the Patent Office a Rubber Stamp?, 58 EMORY L.J. 181 (2008)
Comments
Michael L. Eber, When the Dissent Creates the Law: Cross-Cutting Majorities and the Prediction Model of Precedent, 58 EMORY L.J. 207 (2008)
Erin E. Patrick, Lose Weight or Lose Out: The Legality of State Medicaid Programs That Make Overweight Beneficiaries’ Receipt of Funds Contingent Upon Health Lifestyle Choices, 58 EMORY L.J. 249 (2008)
January 27, 2009 at 8:17 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Emory)
Print This Post
One Comment
Emory Law Journal 57:6 (2008)
posted by Emory Law Journal
Emory Law Journal, 57:6 (2008)
Including tributes by Frank S. Alexander, David J. Bederman, Michael J. Broyde, William E. Butler, W. Cole Durham, Jr., Edward McGlynn Gaffney, Jr., Peter Hay, John T. Noonan, Jr., Boris Ossipian, Michael Perry, John Quigley, Yuri Senokosov, David Sun, Detlev F. Vagts, Tibor Varady, Lloyd W. Weinreb, John Witte, Jr., and Reinhard Zimmermann.
Articles
David A. Skeel, Jr., The Unbearable Lightness of Christian Legal Scholarship, 57 EMORY L.J. 1471 (2008).
John Witte, Jr., Prophets, Priests, and Kings: John Milton and the Reformation of Rights and Liberties in England, 57 EMORY L.J. 1527 (2008).
Comment
Eric R. Swibel, Churches and Campaign Intervention: Why the Tax Man is Right and How Congress Can Improve His Reputation, 57 EMORY L.J. 1605 (2008).
September 1, 2008 at 1:13 am
Posted in: Law Rev (Emory)
Print This Post
No Comments
Emory Law Journal 57:5 (2008)
posted by Emory Law Journal
Emory Law Journal, 57:5 (2008)
Articles
Adam Benforado & Jon Hanson, Legal Academic Backlash: The Response of Legal Theorists to Situationist Insights, 57 EMORY L.J. 1087 (2008).
Janet Koven Levit, Bottom-Up Lawmaking Through a Pluralist Lens:The ICC Banking Commission and the Transnational Regulation of Letters of Credit, 57 EMORY L.J. 1147 (2008).
Essay
Frank B. Cross, Thomas A. Smith & Antonio Tomarchio, The Reagan Revolution in the Network of Law, 57 EMORY L.J. 1227 (2008).
Comments
Sarah Tope Reise, “Just Say No” to Pro-Drug and Alcohol Student Speech: The Constitutionality of School Prohibitions of Student Speech Promoting Drug and Alcohol Use, 57 EMORY L.J. 1259 (2008).
Andrea Vanina Arias, Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Swords and Armor: Regulating the Theft of Virtual Goods, 57 EMORY L.J. 1301 (2008).
Amber Leigh Bagley, An Era of Human Zoning: Banishing Sex Offenders from Communities Through Residence and Work Restrictions, 57 EMORY L.J. 1347 (2008).
August 15, 2008 at 1:39 am
Posted in: Law Rev (Emory)
Print This Post
No Comments
Emory Law Journal 57:4 (2008)
posted by Emory Law Journal
Emory Law Journal, 57:4 (2008)
Articles
Thomas A. Piraino, Jr., The Antitrust Analysis of Joint Ventures after the Supreme Court’s Daugher Decision, 57 EMORY L.J. 735 (2008).
Frederick Tung, The New Death of Contract: Creeping Corporate Fiduciary Duties for Creditors, 57 EMORY L.J. 809 (2008).
DEBATE: Saving the World with Corporate Law?
Kent Greenfield, Proposition: Saving the World with Corporate Law, 57 EMORY L.J. 948 (2008).
D. Gordon Smith, Response: The Dystopian Potential of Corporate Law, 57 EMORY L.J. 985 (2008).
Comments
Jordon T. Stringer, Criminalizing Voter Suppression: The Necessity of Restoring Legitimacy in Federal Elections and Reversing Disillusionment in Minority Communities, 57 EMORY L.J. 1011 (2008).
Elisabeth Bassett, Reform Through Exposure, 57 EMORY L.J. 1049 (2008).
July 31, 2008 at 9:33 am
Posted in: Law Rev (Emory)
Print This Post
One Comment
Emory Law Journal 57:3 (2008)
posted by Emory Law Journal
Emory Law Journal, 57:3 (2008)
Articles
Adam Benforado & Jon Hanson, Naive Cynicism: Maintaining False Perceptions in Policy Debates, 57 EMORY L.J. 499 (2008).
Thomas R. Lee, Glenn L. Christensen & Eric D. DeRosia, Trademarks, Consumer Psychology, and the Sophisticated Consumer, 57 EMORY L.J. 575 (2008).
Comments
Juhi Kaveeshvar, Kicking the Rock & the Hard Place to the Curb: An Alternative and Integrated Approach to Suicidal Students in Higher Education, 57 EMORY L.J. 651 (2008).
Carlissa R. Carson, The Military Commissions Act of 2006: How its Inability to Curb Abusive Interrogations Threatens the Future Treatment of Detainees and the United States Reputation, 57 EMORY L.J. 695 (2008).
June 2, 2008 at 9:35 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Emory), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments
Emory Law Journal, 57:2 (2008)
posted by Emory Law Journal
Emory Law Journal, 57:2 (2008)
Articles
Adam Benforado & Jon Hanson, The Great Attributional Divide: How Divergent Views of Human Behavior are Shaping Legal Policy, 57 EMORY L.J. 311 (2008).
Barak Y. Orbach, Indirect Free Riding on the Wheels of Commerce: Dual-Use Technologies and Copyright Liability, 57 EMORY L.J. 409 (2008).
Comment
C. Jordan Myers, Learning to Live with Jones v. Flowers: A “New Wrinkle” For an Old Standard, 57 EMORY L.J. 463 (2008).
June 2, 2008 at 9:25 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Emory), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments
Emory Law Journal, 57:1 (December 2007)
posted by Emory Law Journal
Emory Law Journal, 57:1 (December 2007)
The 2007 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium — The New Federalism: Plural Governance in a Decentered World
Robert B. Ahdieh, From Federalism to Intersystemic Governance: The Changing Nature of Modern Jurisdiction, 57 EMORY L.J. 1 (2007)
Articles & Essays
Judith Resnik, Foreign as Domestic Affairs: Rethinking Horizontal Federalism and Foreign Affairs Preemption in Light of Translocal Internationalism, 57 EMORY L.J. 31 (2007)
Ernest A. Young, Toward a Framework Statute for Supranational Adjudication, 57 EMORY L.J. 93 (2007)
Robert A. Schapiro, Federalism as Intersystemic Governance: Legitimacy in a Post-Westphalian World, 57 EMORY L.J. 115 (2007)
Mark Tushnet, Judicial Enforcement of Federalist-Based Constitutional Limitations: Some Skeptical Comparative Observations, 57 EMORY L.J. 135 (2007)
William W. Buzbee, Interaction’s Promise: Preemption Policy Shifts, Risk Regulation, and Experimentalism Lessons, 57 EMORY L.J. 146 (2007)
Charles H. Koch, Jr., The Devolution of Implementing Policymaking in Network Governments, 57 EMORY L.J. 167 (2007)
David J. Bederman, Diversity and Permeability in Transnational Governance, 57 EMORY L.J. 201 (2007)
Robert B. Ahdieh, From Federal Rules to Intersystemic Governance in Securities Regulation, 57 EMORY L.J. 233 (2007)
Comments
Jessica Leigh Rosenthal, The Interactive Process Disabled: Improving ADA and Strengthening the EEOC Through the Adoption of the Interactive Process, 57 EMORY L.J. 247 (2007)
Holly M. Sharp, The Day the Music Died: How Overly Extended Copyright Terms Threaten the Very Existence of Our Nation’s Earliest Musical Works, 57 EMORY L.J. 279 (2007)
February 28, 2008 at 11:11 am
Posted in: Law Rev (Emory), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments
Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project
posted by Daniel Solove
I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.
The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!
Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.
Participating law reviews thus far include:
* Boston College
* Chicago
* Columbia
* Cornell
* Duke
* Emory
* Fordham
* Georgetown
* GW
* Harvard
* Indiana
* Michigan
* Minnesota
* NYU
* Northwestern
* Notre Dame
* Southern California
* Stanford
* Texas
* UCLA
* Vanderbilt
* Virginia
* Washington University
* Yale
We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.
We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.
November 13, 2007 at 12:10 am
Posted in: Administrative Announcements, Law Rev (Boston College), Law Rev (Chicago), Law Rev (Columbia), Law Rev (Cornell), Law Rev (Duke), Law Rev (Emory), Law Rev (Fordham), Law Rev (GW), Law Rev (Georgetown), Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev (Indiana), Law Rev (Michigan), Law Rev (Minnesota), Law Rev (NYU), Law Rev (Northwestern), Law Rev (Notre Dame), Law Rev (S Cal), Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev (Texas), Law Rev (UCLA), Law Rev (Vanderbilt), Law Rev (Virginia), Law Rev (Yale), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
7 Comments
