Archive for the ‘Law Rev (Duke)’ Category
Duke Law Journal May 2008 Issue
posted by Duke Law Journal

Volume 57 May 2008 Number 7
Articles
Administrative Law’s Federalism: Preemption, Delegation, and Agencies at the Edge of Federal Power
Brian Galle, Mark Seidenfeld
Administrative Law as the New Federalism
Gillian E. Metzger
Essays
Tennis with the Net Down: Administrative Federalism Without Congress
Stuart Minor Benjamin, Ernest A. Young
The California Greenhouse Gas Waiver Decision and Agency Interpretation: A Response to Professors Galle and Seidenfeld
Nina A. Mendelson
November 7, 2008 at 6:25 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Duke), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments
Duke Law Journal April 2008 Issue
posted by Duke Law Journal

Volume 57 April 2008 Number 6
Articles
Is It Wrong to Sue for Rape?
Tom Lininger
The Right’s Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Woman-Protective Anti-Abortion Argument
Reva B. Siegel
Economic Foundations of Intellectual Property Rights
Joseph E. Stiglitz
In Defense of Prometheus: Some Ethical, Economic, and Regulatory Issues of Sports Doping
Richard A. Posner
The Problem of Doping
Doriane Lambelet Coleman and James E. Coleman, Jr.
Notes
The Costs of Perceived Hypocrisy: The Impact of U.S. Treatment of Foreign Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises
Destiny Duron Deas
Assessing the Constitutionality of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court
John Dorsett Niles
Cell Phone Ringtones: A Case Study Exemplifying the Complexities of the Section 115 Mechanical License of the Copyright Act of 1976
Daniel M. Simon
The Shadows of Future Generations
Matthew W. Wolfe
November 7, 2008 at 6:07 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Duke), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments
Duke Law Journal, March 2008 Issue
posted by Duke Law Journal

Volume 57 March 2008 Number 5
Articles
Clare Huntington
Erin Murphy
Notes
Hindsight Is 20/20: Revisiting the Reapportionment Cases to Gain Perspective on Partisan Gerrymanders
Douglass Calidas
From New London to Norwood: A Year in the Life of Eminent Domain
Andrew S. Han
Isaac A. Linnartz
How Reasonable Is “Reasonable”? The Search for Satisfactory Approach to Employment Handbooks
Bryce Yoder
August 10, 2008 at 8:19 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Duke)
Print This Post
No Comments
Duke Law Journal Vol. 57 Issue 4 (February 2008)
posted by Duke Law Journal

Volume 57 February 2008 Number 4
Articles
Institutions in the Marketplace of Ideas
Joseph Blocher
The Internationalization of Public Interest Law
Scott L. Cummings
Is Secured Debt Used to Redistribute Value from Tort Claimants in Bankruptcy? An Empirical Analysis
Yair Listokin
Notes
Regulating Corporations the American Way: Why Exhaustive Rules and Just Deserts Are the Mainstay of U.S. Corporate Governance
Jonas V. Anderson
Court-Ordered Restrictions on Trial Participant Speech
Jonathan Eric Pahl
The Continued Relevance of the Irrelevance-of-Motive Maxim
Michael T. Rosenberg
Freedom to Defraud: Stoneridge, Primary Liability, and the Need to Properly Define Section 10(b)
Travis S. Souza
Rendering Turner Toothless: The Supreme Court’s Decision in Beard v. Banks
Jennifer N. Wimsatt
May 16, 2008 at 8:35 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Duke)
Print This Post
No Comments
Duke Law Journal, Volume 57, Issue 3 (December 2007)
posted by Duke Law Journal

Volume 57 December 2007 Number 3
Articles
The Legal Ethics of Pediatric Research
Doriane Lambelet Coleman
The Competing Paradigms of Securities Regulation
James J. Park
The Grand Bargain: Revitalizing Labor through NLRA Reform and Radical Workplace Relations
Unionizing NCAA Division I Athletics: A Viable Solution?
Rohith A. Parasuraman
Standing Up to Legislative Bullies: Separation of Powers, State Courts and Educational Rights
Sonja Ralston Elder
Judicial Discretion and the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention Act
Lauren E. Tribble
March 20, 2008 at 7:31 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (Duke)
Print This Post
No Comments
Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project
posted by Daniel Solove

I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project. We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.
The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool. Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult. If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published. Now you don’t have to. Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!
Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called Law Rev Contents – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.
Participating law reviews thus far include:
* Boston College
* Chicago
* Columbia
* Cornell
* Duke
* Emory
* Fordham
* Georgetown
* GW
* Harvard
* Indiana
* Michigan
* Minnesota
* NYU
* Northwestern
* Notre Dame
* Southern California
* Stanford
* Texas
* UCLA
* Vanderbilt
* Virginia
* Washington University
* Yale
We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.
We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful. We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.
November 13, 2007 at 12:10 am
Posted in: Administrative Announcements, Law Rev (Boston College), Law Rev (Chicago), Law Rev (Columbia), Law Rev (Cornell), Law Rev (Duke), Law Rev (Emory), Law Rev (Fordham), Law Rev (Georgetown), Law Rev (GW), Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev (Indiana), Law Rev (Michigan), Law Rev (Minnesota), Law Rev (Northwestern), Law Rev (Notre Dame), Law Rev (NYU), Law Rev (S Cal), Law Rev (Stanford), Law Rev (Texas), Law Rev (UCLA), Law Rev (Vanderbilt), Law Rev (Virginia), Law Rev (Yale), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
7 Comments








