<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Law Rev (Duke)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/category/law-rev-duke/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 16:03:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Volume 60 April 2011 Number 7</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/04/volume-60-april-2011-number-7.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/04/volume-60-april-2011-number-7.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Apr 2011 20:35:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=42898</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 60     April 2011          Number 7</p>
<p>Article</p>
<p>Environmental Harms, Use Conflicts, and Neutral Baselines in Environmental Law</p>
<p> Todd S. Aagaard</p>
<p>Lecture</p>
<p>Administrative Law in the 1930s: The Supreme Court’s Accommodation of Progressive Legal Theory</p>
<p> Mark Tushnet</p>
<p>Note</p>
<p>Promoting Progress with Fair Use</p>
<p> Joshua N. Mitchell</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 60     April 2011          Number 7</p>
<p><strong>Article</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1505+pdf">Environmental Harms, Use Conflicts, and Neutral Baselines in Environmental Law</a></p>
<p><em> Todd S. Aagaard</em></p>
<p><strong>Lecture</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1565+pdf">Administrative Law in the 1930s: The Supreme Court’s Accommodation of Progressive Legal Theory</a></p>
<p><em> Mark Tushnet</em></p>
<p><strong>Note</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1639+pdf">Promoting Progress with Fair Use</a></p>
<p><em> Joshua N. Mitchell</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/04/volume-60-april-2011-number-7.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Volume 60 March 2011 Number 6</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/03/volume-60-march-2011-number-6.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/03/volume-60-march-2011-number-6.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Mar 2011 17:17:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=41972</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 60     March 2011          Number 6</p>
<p>Article</p>
<p>Unbundling Risk</p>
<p> Lee Anne Fennell</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Mohammed Jawad and the Military Commissions of Guantánamo</p>
<p> David J. R. Frakt</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>A Quest for Fair and Balanced: The Supreme Court, State Courts, and the Future of Same-Sex Marriage Review after Perry</p>
<p> Chase D. Anderson</p>
<p>Where Are My Children &#8230; and My Rights? Parental Rights Termination as a Consequence of Deportation</p>
<p> C. Elizabeth Hall</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 60     March 2011          Number 6</p>
<p><strong>Article</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1285+pdf">Unbundling Risk</a></p>
<p><em> Lee Anne Fennell</em></p>
<p><strong>Essay</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1367+pdf">Mohammed Jawad and the Military Commissions of Guantánamo</a></p>
<p><em> David J. R. Frakt</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1413+pdf">A Quest for Fair and Balanced: The Supreme Court, State Courts, and the Future of Same-Sex Marriage Review after <em>Perry</em></a></p>
<p><em> Chase D. Anderson</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1459+pdf">Where Are My Children &#8230; and My Rights? Parental Rights Termination as a Consequence of Deportation</a></p>
<p><em> C. Elizabeth Hall</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/03/volume-60-march-2011-number-6.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Volume 60 February 2011 Number 5</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/02/volume-60-february-2011-number-5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/02/volume-60-february-2011-number-5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Feb 2011 21:27:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=40251</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 60     February 2011          Number 5</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Executive Deference in U.S. Refugee Law: Internationalist Paths Through and Beyond Chevron</p>
<p> Bassina Farbenblum</p>
<p>Prescription for Fairness: A New Approach to Tort Liability of Brand-Name and Generic Drug Manufacturers</p>
<p> Allen Rostron</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Relevance and Fairness: Protecting the Rights of Domestic-Violence Victims and Left-Behind Fathers under the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction</p>
<p> Noah L. Browne</p>
<p>&#8220;There Is Something Unique &#8230; about the Government Funding of the Arts for First Amendment Purposes&#8221;: An Institutional Approach to Granting Government Entities Free Speech Rights</p>
<p> Leslie Cooper Mahaffey</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 60     February 2011          Number 5</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1059+pdf">Executive Deference in U.S. Refugee Law: Internationalist Paths Through and Beyond <em>Chevron</em></a></p>
<p><em> Bassina Farbenblum</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1123+pdf">Prescription for Fairness: A New Approach to Tort Liability of Brand-Name and Generic Drug Manufacturers</a></p>
<p><em> Allen Rostron</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1193+pdf">Relevance and Fairness: Protecting the Rights of Domestic-Violence Victims and Left-Behind Fathers under the Hague Convention on International Child Abduction</a></p>
<p><em> Noah L. Browne</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1239+pdf">&#8220;There Is Something Unique &#8230; about the Government Funding of the Arts for First Amendment Purposes&#8221;: An Institutional Approach to Granting Government Entities Free Speech Rights</a></p>
<p><em> Leslie Cooper Mahaffey</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/02/volume-60-february-2011-number-5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Volume 60 January 2011 Number 4</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/01/volume-60-january-2011-number-4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/01/volume-60-january-2011-number-4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Jan 2011 18:11:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=39128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 60           January 2011          Number 4</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Blind Dates: When Should the Statute of Limitations Begin to Run on a Method-of-Execution Challenge?</p>
<p> Ty Alper</p>
<p>Rethinking Novelty in Patent Law</p>
<p> Sean B. Seymore</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Fee Shifting in Investor-State Arbitration: Doctrine and Policy Justifying Application of the English Rule</p>
<p> David P. Riesenberg</p>
<p>Congressional Manipulation of the Sentencing Guideline for Child Pornography Possession: An Argument For or Against Deference?</p>
<p> John Gabriel Woodlee</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 60           January 2011          Number 4</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+865+pdf">Blind Dates: When Should the Statute of Limitations Begin to Run on a Method-of-Execution Challenge?</a></p>
<p><em> Ty Alper</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+919+pdf">Rethinking Novelty in Patent Law</a></p>
<p><em> Sean B. Seymore</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+977+pdf">Fee Shifting in Investor-State Arbitration: Doctrine and Policy Justifying Application of the English Rule</a></p>
<p><em> David P. Riesenberg</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1015+pdf">Congressional Manipulation of the Sentencing Guideline for Child Pornography Possession: An Argument For or Against Deference?</a></p>
<p><em> John Gabriel Woodlee</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/01/volume-60-january-2011-number-4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Volume 60 December 2010 Number 3</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/12/volume-60-december-2010-number-3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/12/volume-60-december-2010-number-3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Dec 2010 22:08:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=37710</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 60         November 2010         Number 3</p>
<p style="text-align: center">Special Symposium Issue
2010 Civil Litigation Review Conference</p>
<p>Introduction</p>
<p>Progress in the Spirit of Rule 1</p>
<p> John G. Koeltl</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Discovering a Better Way: The Need for Effective Civil Litigation Reform</p>
<p> John H. Beisner</p>
<p>Politics and Civil Procedure Rulemaking: Reflections on Experience</p>
<p> Paul D. Carrington</p>
<p>Judicial Case Management: Caught in the Crossfire</p>
<p> Steven S. Gensler</p>
<p>The Present Plight of the United States District Courts</p>
<p> Patrick E. Higginbotham</p>
<p>Defining the Problem of Cost in Federal Civil Litigation</p>
<p> Emery G. Lee III &#38; Thomas E. Willging</p>
<p>Sanctions for E-Discovery Violations: By the Numbers</p>
<p> Dan H. Willoughby, Jr., Rose Hunter Jones, &#38; Gregory R. Antine</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 60         November 2010         Number 3</p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>Special Symposium Issue<br />
2010 Civil Litigation Review Conference</strong></p>
<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+537+pdf">Progress in the Spirit of Rule 1</a></p>
<p><em> John G. Koeltl</em></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+547+pdf">Discovering a Better Way: The Need for Effective Civil Litigation Reform</a></p>
<p><em> John H. Beisner</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+597+pdf">Politics and Civil Procedure Rulemaking: Reflections on Experience</a></p>
<p><em> Paul D. Carrington</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+669+pdf">Judicial Case Management: Caught in the Crossfire</a></p>
<p><em> Steven S. Gensler</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+745+pdf">The Present Plight of the United States District Courts</a></p>
<p><em> Patrick E. Higginbotham</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+765+pdf">Defining the Problem of Cost in Federal Civil Litigation</a></p>
<p><em> Emery G. Lee III &amp; Thomas E. Willging</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+789+pdf">Sanctions for E-Discovery Violations: By the Numbers</a></p>
<p><em> Dan H. Willoughby, Jr., Rose Hunter Jones, &amp; Gregory R. Antine</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/12/volume-60-december-2010-number-3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Volume 60 October 2010 Number 1</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/09/volume-60-october-2010-number-1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/09/volume-60-october-2010-number-1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 19:26:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=34514</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 60       October 2010       Number 1</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>From Conley to Twombly to Iqbal: A Double Play on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure</p>
<p> Arthur R. Miller</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Correcting Mandatory Injustice: Judicial Recommendation of Executive Clemency</p>
<p> Joanna M. Huang</p>
<p>War of the Words: How Courts Can Use Dictionaries Consistent with Textualist Principles</p>
<p> Phillip A. Rubin</p>
<p>The Arab-Israeli Conflict and Civil Litigation against Terrorism</p>
<p> Adam N. Schupack</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 60       October 2010       Number 1</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+1+pdf">From <em>Conley</em> to <em>Twombly</em> to <em>Iqbal:</em> A Double Play on the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure</a></p>
<p><em> Arthur R. Miller</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+131+pdf">Correcting Mandatory Injustice: Judicial Recommendation of Executive Clemency</a></p>
<p><em> Joanna M. Huang</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+167+pdf">War of the Words: How Courts Can Use Dictionaries Consistent with Textualist Principles</a></p>
<p><em> Phillip A. Rubin</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?60+Duke+L.+J.+207+pdf">The Arab-Israeli Conflict and Civil Litigation against Terrorism</a></p>
<p><em> Adam N. Schupack</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/09/volume-60-october-2010-number-1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Volume 59 May 2010 Number 8</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/volume-59-may-2010-number-8.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/volume-59-may-2010-number-8.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Apr 2010 22:41:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=28001</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Volume 59       May 2010       Number 8</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Judicial Specialization and the Adjudication of Immigration Cases</p>
<p> Lawrence Baum</p>
<p>A Diversion of Attention? Immigration Courts and the Adjudication of Fourth and Fifth Amendment Rights</p>
<p> Jennifer M. Chacón</p>
<p>Restructuring Immigration Adjudication</p>
<p> Stephen H. Legomsky</p>
<p>The Rights of Others: Legal Claims and Immigration Outside the Law</p>
<p> Hiroshi Motomura</p>
<p>Constraint through Delegation: The Case of Executive Control over Immigration Policy</p>
<p> Cristina M. Rodríguez</p>
<p>Response</p>
<p>Practical Impediments to Structural Reform and the Promise of Third Branch Analytic Methods: A Reply to Professors Baum and Legomsky</p>
<p> Russell R. Wheeler</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Volume 59       May 2010       Number 8</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+1501+pdf">Judicial Specialization and the Adjudication of Immigration Cases</a></p>
<p><em> Lawrence Baum</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+1563+pdf">A Diversion of Attention? Immigration Courts and the Adjudication of Fourth and Fifth Amendment Rights</a></p>
<p><em> Jennifer M. Chacón</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+1635+pdf">Restructuring Immigration Adjudication</a></p>
<p><em> Stephen H. Legomsky</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+1723+pdf">The Rights of Others: Legal Claims and Immigration Outside the Law</a></p>
<p><em> Hiroshi Motomura</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+1787+pdf">Constraint through Delegation: The Case of Executive Control over Immigration Policy</a></p>
<p><em> Cristina M. Rodríguez</em></p>
<p><strong>Response</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+1847+pdf">Practical Impediments to Structural Reform and the Promise of Third Branch Analytic Methods: A Reply to Professors Baum and Legomsky</a></p>
<p><em> Russell R. Wheeler</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/volume-59-may-2010-number-8.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Volume 59 April 2010 Number 7</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/volume-59-april-2010-number-7.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/volume-59-april-2010-number-7.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 23:06:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p style="text-align: left">Volume 59         April 2010          Number 7</p>
<p>Article</p>
<p>The Last Bankrupt Hanged: Balancing Incentives in the Development of Bankruptcy Law</p>
<p> Emily Kadens</p>
<p>Administrative Law, Filter Failure, and Information Capture</p>
<p> Wendy E. Wagner</p>
<p>Tribute</p>
<p>Robinson O. Everett</p>
<p> Dean David F. Levi, Walter Thompson Cox III, Scott L. Silliman &#38; James M. Markham</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Protecting Shareholder Access to Director Elections: A Response to CA, Inc. v. AFSCME Urging the Adoption of a Blasius Standard of Review for the Exercise of a Fiduciary-Out Clause</p>
<p>Christopher Fawal</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left">Volume 59         April 2010          Number 7</p>
<p><strong>Article</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+1229+pdf">The Last Bankrupt Hanged: Balancing Incentives in the Development of Bankruptcy Law</a></p>
<p><em> Emily Kadens</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+1321+pdf">Administrative Law, Filter Failure, and Information Capture</a></p>
<p><em> Wendy E. Wagner</em></p>
<p><strong>Tribute</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+1433+pdf">Robinson O. Everett</a></p>
<p><em> Dean David F. Levi, Walter Thompson Cox III, Scott L. Silliman &amp; James M. Markham</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+1457+pdf">Protecting Shareholder Access to Director Elections: A Response to <em>CA, Inc. v. AFSCME</em> Urging the Adoption of a <em>Blasius</em> Standard of Review for the Exercise of a Fiduciary-Out Clause</a></p>
<p><em>Christopher Fawal</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/volume-59-april-2010-number-7.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal,     Volume 59,     January 2010</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/duke-law-journal-volume-59-january-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/duke-law-journal-volume-59-january-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Jan 2010 02:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=23998</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p style="text-align: left">Volume 59         January 2010          Number 4</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>International Idealism Meets Domestic-Criminal-Procedure Realism</p>
<p>Stephanos Bibas &#38; William W. Burke-White</p>
<p>Of Christmas Trees and Corpus Christi: Ceremonial Deism and Change in Meaning over Time</p>
<p>B. Jessie Hill</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Struck by Stereotype: Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Pregnancy Discrimination as Sex Discrimination</p>
<p>Neil S. Siegel &#38; Reva B. Siegel</p>
<p>Postscript</p>
<p>A Postscript to Struck by Stereotype</p>
<p>Ruth Bader Ginsburg</p>
<p>Note</p>
<p>Narrowing the Bankruptcy Safe Harbor for Derivatives to Combat Systemic Risk</p>
<p>Bryan G. Faubus</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p style="text-align: left">Volume 59         January 2010          Number 4</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+637+pdf">International Idealism Meets Domestic-Criminal-Procedure Realism</a></p>
<p><em>Stephanos Bibas &amp; William W. Burke-White</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+705+pdf">Of Christmas Trees and Corpus Christi: Ceremonial Deism and Change in Meaning over Time</a></p>
<p><em>B. Jessie Hill</em></p>
<p><strong>Essay</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+771+pdf"><em>Struck</em> by Stereotype: Ruth Bader Ginsburg on Pregnancy Discrimination as Sex Discrimination</a></p>
<p><em>Neil S. Siegel &amp; Reva B. Siegel</em></p>
<p><strong>Postscript</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+799+pdf">A Postscript to Struck <em>by Stereotype</em></a></p>
<p><em>Ruth Bader Ginsburg</em></p>
<p><strong>Note</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+801+pdf">Narrowing the Bankruptcy Safe Harbor for Derivatives to Combat Systemic Risk</a></p>
<p><em>Bryan G. Faubus</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/duke-law-journal-volume-59-january-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal, Volume 59, December 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/duke-law-journal-volume-59-december-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/duke-law-journal-volume-59-december-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 2009 18:58:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22748</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 59         December 2009          Number 3</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Cybersieves</p>
<p>Derek E. Bambauer</p>
<p>The Limits of Advocacy</p>
<p>Amanda Frost</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Constitutional Limits on Private Policing and the State&#8217;s Allocation of Force</p>
<p>M. Rhead Enion</p>
<p>The NCAA&#8217;s Lost Cause and the Legal Ease of Redefining Amateurism</p>
<p>Virginia A. Fitt</p>
<p>Not Peace, but a Sword: Navy v. Egan and the Case Against Judicial Abdication in Foreign Affairs</p>
<p>Jason Rathod</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 59         December 2009          Number 3</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+377+pdf">Cybersieves</a></p>
<p><em>Derek E. Bambauer</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+447+pdf">The Limits of Advocacy</a></p>
<p><em>Amanda Frost</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+519+pdf">Constitutional Limits on Private Policing and the State&#8217;s Allocation of Force</a></p>
<p><em>M. Rhead Enion</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+555+pdf">The NCAA&#8217;s Lost Cause and the Legal Ease of Redefining Amateurism</a></p>
<p><em>Virginia A. Fitt</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+595+pdf">Not Peace, but a Sword: Navy v. Egan and the Case Against Judicial Abdication in Foreign Affairs</a></p>
<p><em>Jason Rathod</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/duke-law-journal-volume-59-december-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 59 November 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/duke-law-journal-volume-59-november-2009-number-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/duke-law-journal-volume-59-november-2009-number-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 59    November 2009     Number 2</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>How the Dissent Becomes the Majority: Using Federalism to Transform Coalitions in the U.S. Supreme Court</p>
<p>Vanessa Baird &#38; Tonja Jacobi</p>
<p>Living Originalism</p>
<p>Thomas B. Colby &#38; Peter J. Smith</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Reasonableness Meets Requirements: Regulating Security and Privacy in Software</p>
<p>Paul N. Otto</p>
<p>Making Amends: Amending the ICSID Convention to Reconcile Competing Interests in International Investment Law</p>
<p>Kate M. Supnik</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 59    November 2009     Number 2</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+183+pdf">How the Dissent Becomes the Majority: Using Federalism to Transform Coalitions in the U.S. Supreme Court</a></p>
<p><em>Vanessa Baird &amp; Tonja Jacobi</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+239+pdf">Living Originalism</a></p>
<p><em>Thomas B. Colby &amp; Peter J. Smith</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+309+pdf">Reasonableness Meets Requirements: Regulating Security and Privacy in Software</a></p>
<p><em>Paul N. Otto</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+343+pdf">Making Amends: Amending the ICSID Convention to Reconcile Competing Interests in International Investment Law</a></p>
<p><em>Kate M. Supnik</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/duke-law-journal-volume-59-november-2009-number-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 59 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/duke-law-journal-volume-59-october-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/duke-law-journal-volume-59-october-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 59    October 2009     Number 1</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Constraining Public Employee Speech: Government&#8217;s Control of Its Workers&#8217; Speech to Protect Its Own Expression</p>
<p>Helen Norton</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Rescuing the Hero: The Ramifications of Expanding the Duty to Rescue on Society and the Law</p>
<p>Amelia H. Ashton</p>
<p>When Insiders Become Outsiders: Parental Objections to Public School Sex Education Programs</p>
<p>Emily J. Brown</p>
<p>The Fiduciary Duty in Mutual Fund Excessive Fee Cases: Ripe for Reexamination</p>
<p>Emily D. Johnson</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 59    October 2009     Number 1</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+1+pdf">Constraining Public Employee Speech: Government&#8217;s Control of Its Workers&#8217; Speech to Protect Its Own Expression</a></p>
<p><em>Helen Norton</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+69+pdf">Rescuing the Hero: The Ramifications of Expanding the Duty to Rescue on Society and the Law</a></p>
<p><em>Amelia H. Ashton</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+109+pdf">When Insiders Become Outsiders: Parental Objections to Public School Sex Education Programs</a></p>
<p><em>Emily J. Brown</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+145+pdf">The Fiduciary Duty in Mutual Fund Excessive Fee Cases: Ripe for Reexamination</a></p>
<p><em>Emily D. Johnson</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/duke-law-journal-volume-59-october-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 58 May 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/duke-law-journal-volume-58-may-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/duke-law-journal-volume-58-may-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 17:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=17939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    May 2009     Number 8</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Pitfalls of Empirical Studies that Attempt to Understand the Factors Affecting Appellate Decisionmaking</p>
<p>Hon. Harry T. Edwards &#38; Michael A. Livermore</p>
<p>A More Perfect System: The 2002 Reforms of the Board of Immigration Appeals</p>
<p>John D. Ashcroft &#38; Kris W. Kobach</p>
<p>The NLRB in Administrative Law Exile: Problems with Its Structure and Function and Suggestions for Reform</p>
<p>Catherine L. Fisk &#38; Deborah C. Malamud</p>
<p>Political Control of Federal Prosecutions: Looking Back and Looking Forward</p>
<p>Daniel Richman</p>
<p>Federalism Accountability: &#8220;Agency-Forcing&#8221; Measures</p>
<p>Catherine M. Sharkey</p>
<p>Depoliticizing Administrative Law</p>
<p>Cass R. Sunstein &#38; Thomas J. Miles</p>
<p>The Parliament of the Experts</p>
<p>Adrian Vermeule</p>
<p>Administration of War</p>
<p>John Yoo</p>
<p>Comment</p>
<p>Comment on Professor Yoo, Administration of War</p>
<p>Richard H. Kohn</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    May 2009     Number 8</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1895+pdf">Pitfalls of Empirical Studies that Attempt to Understand the Factors Affecting Appellate Decisionmaking</a></p>
<p><em>Hon. Harry T. Edwards &amp; Michael A. Livermore</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1991+pdf">A More Perfect System: The 2002 Reforms of the Board of Immigration Appeals</a></p>
<p><em>John D. Ashcroft &amp; Kris W. Kobach</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2013+pdf">The NLRB in Administrative Law Exile: Problems with Its Structure and Function and Suggestions for Reform</a></p>
<p><em>Catherine L. Fisk &amp; Deborah C. Malamud</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2087+pdf">Political Control of Federal Prosecutions: Looking Back and Looking Forward</a></p>
<p><em>Daniel Richman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2125+pdf">Federalism Accountability: &#8220;Agency-Forcing&#8221; Measures</a></p>
<p><em>Catherine M. Sharkey</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2193+pdf">Depoliticizing Administrative Law</a></p>
<p><em>Cass R. Sunstein &amp; Thomas J. Miles</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2231+pdf">The Parliament of the Experts</a></p>
<p><em>Adrian Vermeule</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2277+pdf">Administration of War</a></p>
<p><em>John Yoo</em></p>
<p><strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2313+pdf">Comment on Professor Yoo, Administration of War</a></p>
<p><em>Richard H. Kohn</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/duke-law-journal-volume-58-may-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 58 April 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/duke-law-journal-volume-58-april-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/duke-law-journal-volume-58-april-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 02:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles and Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=15497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58 	April 2009 	Number 7</p>
<p>Foreword</p>
<p>Measuring Judges and Justice</p>
<p>Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky &#38; Jonathan L. Williams</p>
<p>Introduction</p>
<p>“Only Connect”: Toward a Unified Measurement Project</p>
<p>David F. Levi &#38; Mitu Gulati</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Economic Trends and Judicial Outcomes: A Macrotheory of the Court</p>
<p>Thomas Brennan, Lee Epstein &#38; Nancy Staudt</p>
<p>The Warp and Woof of Statutory Interpretation: Comparing Supreme Court Approaches in Tax Law and Workplace Law</p>
<p>James J. Brudney &#38; Corey Ditslear</p>
<p>Judicial Evaluations and Information Forcing: Ranking State High Courts and Their Judges</p>
<p>Stephen J. Choi, Mitu Gulati &#38; Eric A. Posner</p>
<p>Judging the Judges</p>
<p>Frank B. Cross &#38; Stefanie Lindquist</p>
<p>Remaking the United States Supreme Court in the Courts’ of Appeals Image</p>
<p>Tracey E. George &#38; Chris Guthrie</p>
<p>The “Hidden Judiciary”: An Empirical Examination of Executive Branch Justice</p>
<p>Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski &#38; Andrew J. Wistrich</p>
<p>Are Empiricists Asking the Right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58 	April 2009 	Number 7</p>
<p><strong>Foreword</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1173+pdf">Measuring Judges and Justice</a></p>
<p><em>Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky &amp; Jonathan L. Williams</em></p>
<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1181+pdf">“Only Connect”: Toward a Unified Measurement Project</a></p>
<p><em>David F. Levi &amp; Mitu Gulati</em></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1191+pdf">Economic Trends and Judicial Outcomes: A Macrotheory of the Court</a></p>
<p><em>Thomas Brennan, Lee Epstein &amp; Nancy Staudt</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1231+pdf">The Warp and Woof of Statutory Interpretation: Comparing Supreme Court Approaches in Tax Law and Workplace Law</a></p>
<p><em>James J. Brudney &amp; Corey Ditslear</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1313+pdf">Judicial Evaluations and Information Forcing: Ranking State High Courts and Their Judges</a></p>
<p><em>Stephen J. Choi, Mitu Gulati &amp; Eric A. Posner</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1383+pdf">Judging the Judges</a></p>
<p><em>Frank B. Cross &amp; Stefanie Lindquist</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1439+pdf">Remaking the United States Supreme Court in the Courts’ of Appeals Image</a></p>
<p><em>Tracey E. George &amp; Chris Guthrie</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1477+pdf">The “Hidden Judiciary”: An Empirical Examination of Executive Branch Justice</a></p>
<p><em>Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski &amp; Andrew J. Wistrich</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1531+pdf">Are Empiricists Asking the Right Questions about Judicial Decisionmaking?</a></p>
<p><em>Jack Knight</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1531+pdf">Predicting Court Outcomes through Political Preferences: The Japanese Supreme Court and the Chaos of 1993</a></p>
<p><em>J. Mark Ramseyer</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1589+pdf">Are Appointed Judges Strategic Too?</a></p>
<p><em>Joanna M. Shepherd</em></p>
<p><span id="more-15497"></span></p>
<p><strong>Responses</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1627+pdf">Justices as Economic Fixers: A Response to <em>A Macrotheory of the Court</em></a></p>
<p><em>Scott Baker, Adam Feibelman &amp; William P. Marshall</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1645+pdf">The Continuing Search for a Meaningful Model of Judicial Rankings and Why It (Unfortunately) Matters</a></p>
<p><em>Scott Baker, Adam Feibelman &amp; William P. Marshall</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1667+pdf">Probing the Effects of Judicial Specialization</a></p>
<p><em>Lawrence Baum</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1685+pdf">A Response to Professors George and Guthrie,<em> Remaking the United States Supreme Court in the Courts’ of Appeals Image</em></a></p>
<p><em>Michael Boudin</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1687+pdf">A Response to Professor Ramseyer, <em>Predicting Court Outcomes through Political Preferences</em></a></p>
<p><em>Michael Boudin</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1691+pdf">No Warrant for Radical Change: A Response to Professors George and Guthrie</a></p>
<p><em>Erwin Chemerinsky</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1703+pdf">Do Judges Think? Comments on Several Papers Presented at the<em> Duke Law Journal’s</em> Conference on Measuring Judges and Justice</a></p>
<p><em>Robert Henry</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1725+pdf">A Response to Professor Knight, <em>Are Empiricists Asking the Right Questions about Judicial Decisionmaking?</em></a></p>
<p><em>H. Jefferson Powell</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1731+pdf">On Doctors and Judges</a></p>
<p><em>Barak Richman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1743+pdf">Just Because You Can Measure Something, Does It Really Count?</a></p>
<p><em>Laura Denvir Stith</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1759+pdf">Does the Supreme Court Follow the Economic Returns? A Response to <em>A Macrotheory of the Court</em></a></p>
<p><em>Ernest A. Young &amp; Erin C. Blondel</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1783+pdf">The Court and the Code: A Response to <em>The Warp and Woof of Statutory Interpretation</em></a></p>
<p><em>Lawrence Zelenak</em></p>
<p><strong>Book Review</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1791+pdf">Autocrat of the Armchair</a></p>
<p><em>David F. Levi</em></p>
<p><strong>Interview</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1807+pdf">A Conversation with Judge Richard A. Posner</a></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1825+pdf">Applying Lawrence: Teenagers and the Crime against Nature</a></p>
<p><em>Daniel Allender</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1859+pdf">A Picture Imperfect: The Rights of Art Consignor-Collectors When Their Art Dealer Files for Bankruptcy</a></p>
<p><em>Hilary Jay</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/duke-law-journal-volume-58-april-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 58 March 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/duke_law_journa_12.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/duke_law_journa_12.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/03/duke-law-journal-volume-58-march-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    March 2009     Number 6</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Litigation Discovery Cannot Be Optimal but Could Be Better: The Economics of Improving Discovery Timing in a Digital Age</p>
<p>Scott A. Moss</p>
<p>The Lost History of Governance and Equal Protection</p>
<p>V.F. Nourse, Sarah A. Maguire</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Are American CEOs Overpaid, and, if So, What if Anything Should Be Done about It?</p>
<p>Richard A. Posner</p>
<p>Lecture</p>
<p>What Can Brown Do for You?: Neutral Principles and the Struggle over the Equal Protection Clause</p>
<p>Pamela S. Karlan</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Restoring RLUIPAs Equal Terms Provision</p>
<p>Sarah Keeton Campbell</p>
<p>Abandonment and Reconciliation: Addressing Political and Common Law Objections to Fetal Homicide Laws</p>
<p>Douglas S. Curran</p>
<p>Fraud on the Market Gets a Minitrial: Eisen through In re IPO</p>
<p>Patricia Groot</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    March 2009     Number 6</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+889+pdf">Litigation Discovery Cannot Be Optimal but Could Be Better: The Economics of Improving Discovery Timing in a Digital Age</a></p>
<p><em>Scott A. Moss</em></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+955+pdf">The Lost History of Governance and Equal Protection</a></p>
<p><em>V.F. Nourse, Sarah A. Maguire</em></p>
<p><strong>Essay</strong></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1013+pdf">Are American CEOs Overpaid, and, if So, What if Anything Should Be Done about It?</a></p>
<p><em>Richard A. Posner</em></p>
<p><strong>Lecture</strong></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1049+pdf">What Can Brown Do for You?: Neutral Principles and the Struggle over the Equal Protection Clause</a></p>
<p><em>Pamela S. Karlan</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1071+pdf">Restoring RLUIPAs Equal Terms Provision</a></p>
<p><em>Sarah Keeton Campbell</em></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1107+pdf">Abandonment and Reconciliation: Addressing Political and Common Law Objections to Fetal Homicide Laws</a></p>
<p><em>Douglas S. Curran</em></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1143+pdf">Fraud on the Market Gets a Minitrial: Eisen through In re IPO</a></p>
<p><em>Patricia Groot</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/duke_law_journa_12.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 58 February 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/duke_law_journa_10.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/duke_law_journa_10.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/duke-law-journal-volume-58-february-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    February 2009     Number 5</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Judgment-Sharing Agreements</p>
<p>Christopher R. Leslie</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Remembering Democracy in the Debate over Election Reform</p>
<p>Matthew Michael Calabria</p>
<p>A Question of Costs: Considering Pressure on White-Collar Criminal Defendants</p>
<p>Sarah Ribstein</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    February 2009     Number 5</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Judgment-Sharing Agreements</p>
<p><em>Christopher R. Leslie</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Remembering Democracy in the Debate over Election Reform</p>
<p><em>Matthew Michael Calabria</em></p>
<p>A Question of Costs: Considering Pressure on White-Collar Criminal Defendants</p>
<p><em>Sarah Ribstein</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/duke_law_journa_10.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Vol. 58 January 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/duke_law_journa_9.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/duke_law_journa_9.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/01/duke-law-journal-vol-58-january-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    January 2009     Number 4</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Chevron&#8217;s Mistake</p>
<p>Lisa Schultz Bressman</p>
<p>Money, Politics, and Impartial Justice</p>
<p>Joanna M. Shepherd</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Avoiding Mere Incantations: Evaluating Success on Nonfee Claims When Determing Prevailing-Party Status under 42 U.S.C. § 1998</p>
<p>Jessica L. Brumley</p>
<p>Counting Offenses</p>
<p>Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    January 2009     Number 4</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Chevron&#8217;s Mistake</p>
<p><em>Lisa Schultz Bressman</em></p>
<p>Money, Politics, and Impartial Justice</p>
<p><em>Joanna M. Shepherd</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Avoiding Mere Incantations: Evaluating Success on Nonfee Claims When Determing Prevailing-Party Status under 42 U.S.C. § 1998</p>
<p><em>Jessica L. Brumley</em></p>
<p>Counting Offenses</p>
<p><em>Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/duke_law_journa_9.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 58 December Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/duke_law_journa_8.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/duke_law_journa_8.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/12/duke-law-journal-volume-58-december-issue.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    December 2008     Number 3</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Spending Clause Litigation in the Roberts Court</p>
<p>Samuel R. Bagenstos</p>
<p>Regulation with Placebo Effects</p>
<p>Anup Malani</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Constitutional Secrecy: Aligning National Security Letter Nondisclosure Provisions with First Amendment Rights</p>
<p>Brian D. Eyink</p>
<p>Milberg&#8217;s Monopoly: Restoring Honesty and Competition to the Plaintiffs&#8217; Bar</p>
<p>James P. McDonald</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    December 2008     Number 3</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Spending Clause Litigation in the Roberts Court</p>
<p><em>Samuel R. Bagenstos</em></p>
<p>Regulation with Placebo Effects</p>
<p><em>Anup Malani</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Constitutional Secrecy: Aligning National Security Letter Nondisclosure Provisions with First Amendment Rights</p>
<p><em>Brian D. Eyink</em></p>
<p>Milberg&#8217;s Monopoly: Restoring Honesty and Competition to the Plaintiffs&#8217; Bar</p>
<p><em>James P. McDonald</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/duke_law_journa_8.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal November 2008 Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_7.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_7.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/duke-law-journal-november-2008-issue.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    November 2008     Number 2</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Leaving the House: The Constitutional Status of Resignation from the House of Representatives</p>
<p>Josh Chafetz</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Victims&#8217; Rights in an Adversary System</p>
<p>Erin C. Blondel </p>
<p>The Newest Spectator Sport: Why Extending Victims&#8217; Rights to the Spectators&#8217; Gallery Erodes the Presumption of Innocence</p>
<p>Sierra Elizabeth</p>
<p>The Development and Failure of Social Norms in Second Life</p>
<p>Phillip Stoup</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    November 2008     Number 2</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Leaving the House: The Constitutional Status of Resignation from the House of Representatives</p>
<p><em>Josh Chafetz</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Victims&#8217; Rights in an Adversary System</p>
<p><em>Erin C. Blondel </em></p>
<p>The Newest Spectator Sport: Why Extending Victims&#8217; Rights to the Spectators&#8217; Gallery Erodes the Presumption of Innocence</p>
<p><em>Sierra Elizabeth</em></p>
<p>The Development and Failure of Social Norms in Second Life</p>
<p><em>Phillip Stoup</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_7.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal October 2008 Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_6.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_6.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/duke-law-journal-october-2008-issue.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    October 2008     Number 1</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Habeas Corpus and State Sentencing Reform: A Story of Unintended Consequences</p>
<p>Nancy J. King, Suzanna Sherry</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>A Divine Comity: Certification (at Last) in North Carolina</p>
<p>Eric Eisenberg</p>
<p>Buyer Beware: Why the Class Arbitration Waiver Presents a Gloomy Future for Consumers</p>
<p>Daniel R. Higginbotham 	</p>
<p>The Next &#8220;Great Dissenter&#8221;? How Clarence Thomas Is Using the Words and Principles of John Marshall Harlan to Craft a New Era of Civil Rights</p>
<p>Hannah L. Weiner</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    October 2008     Number 1</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Habeas Corpus and State Sentencing Reform: A Story of Unintended Consequences</p>
<p><em>Nancy J. King, Suzanna Sherry</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>A Divine Comity: Certification (at Last) in North Carolina</p>
<p><em>Eric Eisenberg</em></p>
<p>Buyer Beware: Why the Class Arbitration Waiver Presents a Gloomy Future for Consumers</p>
<p><em>Daniel R. Higginbotham 	</em></p>
<p>The Next &#8220;Great Dissenter&#8221;? How Clarence Thomas Is Using the Words and Principles of John Marshall Harlan to Craft a New Era of Civil Rights</p>
<p><em>Hannah L. Weiner</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/dljtoc58n1">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_6.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

