<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Law Rev Contents</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/category/law-rev-contents/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 84:5 (November 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/new-york-university-law-review-845-november-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/new-york-university-law-review-845-november-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Nov 2009 14:44:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22117</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[










Volume 84
November 2009
Number 5



<p>&#160;
BRENNAN LECTURE</p>
<p>The Reach of State Corporate Law Beyond State Borders: Reflections Upon Federalism</p>
<p>The Honorable Jack B. Jacobs
&#160;
ARTICLES</p>
<p>Internal Poison Pills</p>
<p>George S. Geis</p>
<p>Existing Uses and the Limits of Land Use Regulations</p>
<p>Christopher Serkin
&#160;
NOTES</p>
<p>The Costs of &#8220;Discernible and Manageable Standards&#8221; in Vieth and Beyond</p>
<p>Joshua S. Stillman</p>
<p>The Constitutional Life of Legislative Instructions in America</p>
<p>Christopher Terranova</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="width: 100%" border="0" bgcolor="#111d5f">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" alt="New York University Law Review" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<table style="width: 100%" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 84</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">November 2009</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
<strong>BRENNAN LECTURE</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063660.pdf">The Reach of State Corporate Law Beyond State Borders: Reflections Upon Federalism</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Jack B. Jacobs</em><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063661.pdf">Internal Poison Pills</a></p>
<p><em>George S. Geis</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063662.pdf">Existing Uses and the Limits of Land Use Regulations</a></p>
<p><em>Christopher Serkin</em><br />
&nbsp;<br />
<strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063663.pdf">The Costs of &#8220;Discernible and Manageable Standards&#8221; in <em>Vieth</em> and Beyond</a></p>
<p><em>Joshua S. Stillman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063664.pdf">The Constitutional Life of Legislative Instructions in America</a></p>
<p><em>Christopher Terranova</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/new-york-university-law-review-845-november-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 95 Number 1 (November 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/cornell-law-review-volume-95-number-1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/cornell-law-review-volume-95-number-1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 95 Number 1 (November 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>The Structural Case for Vertical Maximalism
Tara Leigh Grove</p>
<p>Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory?
Victoria Nourse &#38; Gregory Shaffer</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Evolutionary Theory and the Origin of Property Rights
James E. Krier</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Negative Equity and Purchase-Money Security Interests Under the Uniform Commercial Code and the BAPCPA
Geoffrey M. Collins</p>
<p>An Uncertain Precedent: United States v. Santos and the Possibility of a Legislative Remedy
Evan Ennis</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Current-Issue.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 95 Number 1 (November 2009)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Grove-final.pdf">The Structural Case for Vertical Maximalism</a><br />
<em><span>Tara Leigh Grove</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Nourse-Shaffer-final.pdf">Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory?</a><br />
<em><span>Victoria Nourse &amp; Gregory Shaffer</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Essay</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Krier-final.pdf">Evolutionary Theory and the Origin of Property Rights</a><br />
<em><span>James E. Krier</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Notes</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Collins-final.pdf">Negative Equity and Purchase-Money Security Interests Under the Uniform Commercial Code and the BAPCPA</a><br />
<em><span>Geoffrey M. Collins</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Ennis-final.pdf">An Uncertain Precedent: <em><span>United States v. Santos</span></em> and the Possibility of a Legislative Remedy</a><br />
<em><span>Evan Ennis</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/cornell-law-review-volume-95-number-1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Law Review, Volume 78 Number 2 (November 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-2-november-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-2-november-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fordham Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
</p>



Volume 78

<p align="center">November 2009</p>


<p align="right">Number 2</p>




<p align="center">THE ROBERT L. LEVINE DISTINGUISHED LECTURE
OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO IMMIGRANT REPRESENTATION:
EXPLORING SOLUTIONS</p>
<p>Deepening the Legal Profession&#8217;s Pro Bono
Commitment to the Immigrant Poor
Hon. Robert A. Katzmann
</p>
<p align="center">Report of Subcommittee 1:  Increasing Pro Bono Activity
</p>
<p>The Representational and Counseling
Needs of the Immigrant Poor
Jennifer L. Colyer, Sarah French Russell, Robert E. Juceam &#38; Lewis J. Liman
</p>
<p align="center">Reports of Subcommittee 2:  Enhancing Mechanisms for Service Delivery</p>
<p>Introduction
Claudia Slovinsky</p>
<p>The Immigration Representation Project:
Meeting the Critical Needs of Low-Wage and
Indigent New Yorkers Facing Removal
Jojo Annobil</p>
<p>Barriers to Representation for Detained
Immigrants Facing Deportation:  Varick
Street Detention Facility, A Case Study
Peter L. Markowitz</p>
<p align="center">Report of Subcommittee 3:  Addressing Inadequate Representation</p>
<p>Regulating Immigration Legal Service Providers:
Inadequate Representation and Notario Fraud
Careen Shannon</p>
<p align="center">Essay</p>
<p>A View from the Immigration Bench
Hon. Noel Brennan</p>
<p align="center">Epilogue</p>
<p>Representation for Immigrants:
A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/fordham-law-review/7983.htm"><br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21298" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/fordhamlrev_header.jpg" border="0" alt="fordhamlrev_header" width="500" height="177" /></a></p>
<table style="width: 500px;" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="167">Volume 78</td>
<td width="166">
<p align="center">November 2009</p>
</td>
<td width="167">
<p align="right">Number 2</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="center"><strong>THE ROBERT L. LEVINE DISTINGUISHED LECTURE<br />
OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO IMMIGRANT REPRESENTATION:<br />
EXPLORING SOLUTIONS</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Katzmann_November_2009.pdf">Deepening the Legal Profession&#8217;s Pro Bono<br />
Commitment to the Immigrant Poor</a><br />
Hon. Robert A. Katzmann
</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Report of Subcommittee 1:  Increasing Pro Bono Activity<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Juceam_November_2009.pdf">The Representational and Counseling<br />
Needs of the Immigrant Poor</a><br />
Jennifer L. Colyer, Sarah French Russell, Robert E. Juceam &amp; Lewis J. Liman
</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Reports of Subcommittee 2:  Enhancing Mechanisms for Service Delivery</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Slovinsky_November_2009.pdf">Introduction</a><br />
Claudia Slovinsky</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Annobil_November_2009.pdf">The Immigration Representation Project:<br />
Meeting the Critical Needs of Low-Wage and<br />
Indigent New Yorkers Facing Removal</a><br />
Jojo Annobil</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Markowitz_November_2009.pdf">Barriers to Representation for Detained<br />
Immigrants Facing Deportation:  Varick<br />
Street Detention Facility, A Case Study</a><br />
Peter L. Markowitz</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Report of Subcommittee 3:  Addressing Inadequate Representation</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Shannon_November_2009.pdf">Regulating Immigration Legal Service Providers:<br />
Inadequate Representation and Notario Fraud</a><br />
Careen Shannon</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Essay</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Brennan_November_2009.pdf">A View from the Immigration Bench</a><br />
Hon. Noel Brennan</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Epilogue</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Chin_November_2009.pdf">Representation for Immigrants:<br />
A Judge&#8217;s Personal Perspective</a><br />
Hon. Denny Chin</p>
<p align="center"><strong>ARTICLES<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Sandoval_November_2009.pdf">Disclosure, Deception, and Deep-Packet<br />
Inspection: The Role of the Federal Trade<br />
Commission Act&#8217;s Deceptive Conduct<br />
Prohibitions in the Net Neutrality Debate</a><br />
Catherine J. K. Sandoval</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Sloan_November_2009.pdf">The Dog That Didn&#8217;t Bark:  Stealth<br />
Procedures and the Erosion of Stare Decisis<br />
in the Federal Courts of Appeals</a><br />
Amy E. Sloan
</p>
<p align="center"><strong><span id="more-21868"></span>NOTES<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Colasacco_November_2009.pdf">Where Were the Accountants?<br />
Deepening Insolvency as a Means of Ensuring<br />
Accountants&#8217; Presence When Corporate<br />
Turmoil Materializes</a><br />
Lauren Colasacco</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Klinka_November_2009.pdf">It&#8217;s Been a Privilege:  Advising Patients<br />
of the <em>Tarasoff</em> Duty and Its<br />
Legal Consequences for the Federal<br />
Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege</a><br />
Elisia Klinka</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/McNamara_November_2009.pdf">How the Decisions in Favor of the <em>Stein</em><br />
Thirteen Will Affect the Litigation of<br />
Corporate Crime and Department of<br />
Justice Policies and Expand the<br />
Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel</a><br />
Christopher McNamara</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Nicholds_November_2009.pdf">The Free Jammie Movement:  Is<br />
Making a File Available to Other Users over a<br />
Peer-to-Peer Computer<br />
Network Sufficient To Infringe the Copyright<br />
Owner&#8217;s 17 U.S.C. § 106(3) Distribution Right?</a><br />
Ken Nicholds</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Yanovich_November_2009.pdf">Answering Justice Scalia&#8217;s Question:<br />
Dual Sovereignty and the Sixth<br />
Amendment Right to Counsel<br />
After <em>Texas v. Cobb</em> and <em>Montejo v. Louisiana</em></a><br />
Ryan M. Yanovich
</p>
<p align="center"><strong>COMMENT<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Patel_November_2009.pdf">Delayed Access to Generic Medicine:<br />
A Comment on the Hatch-Waxman<br />
Act and the &#8220;Approval Bottleneck&#8221;</a><br />
Ankur N. Patel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-2-november-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Yale Law Journal Vol. 119, Issue 1 (2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/the-yale-law-journal-vol-119-issue-1-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/the-yale-law-journal-vol-119-issue-1-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 15:35:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yale Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Yale)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21773</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
October 2009 &#124; Volume 119,  Issue 1





Article



Proposing a Place for Politics in
Arbitrary and Capricious Review
Kathryn A. Watts
2







Note 



When the Interests of Municipalities and
Their Officials Diverge: Municipal Dual Representation
and Conflicts of Interest in § 1983 Litigation 
Dina Mishra
86







Comment



Fantasy Liability: Publicity Law, the First Amendment,
and Fantasy Sports
131



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://yalelawjournal.org/"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/11/cop_ylj.jpg" alt="The Yale Law Journal" width="530" height="102" /></a></p>
<div><span style="font-size: medium"><strong>October 2009 | Volume 119,  Issue 1</strong></span></div>
<div><span style="font-size: medium"><strong><br />
</strong></span></div>
<table style="width: 600px;height: 456px" border="0" cellspacing="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="top"><span style="font-size: medium"><strong>Article</strong></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="font-size: small"><a href="http://yalelawjournal.org/119/1/Watts.html">Proposing a Place for Politics in<br />
Arbitrary and Capricious Review</a><br />
Kathryn A. Watts</span></td>
<td align="right" valign="top">2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="top"><span style="font-size: medium"><strong>Note </strong></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="font-size: small"><a href="http://yalelawjournal.org/119/1/Mishra.html">When the Interests of Municipalities and<br />
Their Officials Diverge: Municipal Dual Representation<br />
and Conflicts of Interest in § 1983 Litigation </a><br />
Dina Mishra</span></td>
<td align="right" valign="top">86</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td colspan="3" valign="top"><span style="font-size: medium"><strong>Comment</strong></span></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td valign="top"></td>
<td valign="top"><span style="font-size: small"><a href="http://yalelawjournal.org/119/1/Bhatnagar.html">Fantasy Liability: Publicity Law, the First Amendment,<br />
and Fantasy Sports</a></span></td>
<td align="right" valign="top">131</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/the-yale-law-journal-vol-119-issue-1-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 84:4 (October 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/new-york-university-law-review-844-october-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/new-york-university-law-review-844-october-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21475</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[










Volume 84
October 2009
Number 4



<p>&#160;
ARTICLES</p>
<p>Cruelty, Prison Conditions, and the Eighth Amendment </p>
<p>Sharon Dolovich</p>
<p>Are All Legal Probabilities Created Equal? </p>
<p>Yuval Feldman &#38; Doron Teichman</p>
<p>Contract Design and the Structure of Contractual Intent </p>
<p>Jody S. Kraus &#38; Robert E. Scott
&#160;</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>Privacy, Free Speech, and the Patriot Act: First and Fourth Amendment Limits on National Security Letters </p>
<p>Patrick P. Garlinger</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="width: 100%" border="0" bgcolor="#111d5f">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" alt="New York University Law Review" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<table style="width: 100%" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 84</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">October 2009</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 4</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>&nbsp;<br />
<strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063495.pdf">Cruelty, Prison Conditions, and the Eighth Amendment </a></p>
<p><em>Sharon Dolovich</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063496.pdf">Are All Legal Probabilities Created Equal? </a></p>
<p><em>Yuval Feldman &amp; Doron Teichman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063497.pdf">Contract Design and the Structure of Contractual Intent </a></p>
<p><em>Jody S. Kraus &amp; Robert E. Scott</em><br />
&nbsp;</p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_063498.pdf">Privacy, Free Speech, and the Patriot Act: First and Fourth Amendment Limits on National Security Letters </a></p>
<p><em>Patrick P. Garlinger</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/new-york-university-law-review-844-october-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia Law Review 95:6 (October 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/virginia-law-review-956-october-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/virginia-law-review-956-october-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:21:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Virginia)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21388</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center">VOLUME 95      OCTOBER 2009     ISSUE 6</p>
<p style="text-align: center"></p>
<p style="text-align: center">Virginia Law Review 95:6 (October 2009)</p>
<p style="text-align: center">
ARTICLES</p>



National Security Fact Deference

<p style="text-align: right" align="right">Robert M. Chesney</p>



Intent to Contract


<p style="text-align: right">Gregory Klass</p>




<p style="text-align: center"> ESSAY</p>



Originality

<p style="text-align: right" align="right">Gideon Parchomovsky  &#38; Alex Stein</p>




<p style="text-align: center">NOTE</p>



Separate, But Equal? Virginia&#8217;s &#8220;Independent&#8221; Cities and the Purported Virtues of Voluntary Interlocal Agreements

<p style="text-align: right" align="right">David K. Roberts</p>




]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><strong>VOLUME 95      OCTOBER 2009     ISSUE 6</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img style="border: 0px initial initial" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/rotunda3.gif" alt="" width="189" height="154" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?issue=57">Virginia Law Review 95:6 (October 2009)</a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong><br />
ARTICLES</strong></p>
<table style="text-align: center;width: 500px;cursor: default;border: #bbbbbb 0px dashed" border="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: left;margin: 8px;width: 50%;color: #000000;font-size: 11px;cursor: text;border: #ffffff 1px dashed;padding: 0.75pt" valign="top"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=269">National Security Fact Deference</a><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=222"></a></td>
<td style="margin: 8px;width: 50%;color: #000000;font-size: 11px;cursor: text;border: #ffffff 1px dashed;padding: 0.75pt" valign="top">
<p style="text-align: right" align="right">Robert M. Chesney</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: left;margin: 8px;width: 49%;color: #000000;font-size: 11px;cursor: text;border: #ffffff 1px dashed;padding: 0.75pt" valign="top"><span><a></a></span><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=272">Intent to Contract</a><br />
<a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=225"></a></td>
<td style="margin: 8px;width: 49%;color: #000000;font-size: 11px;cursor: text;border: #ffffff 1px dashed;padding: 0.75pt" valign="top">
<p style="text-align: right">Gregory Klass</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong> </strong><strong>ESSA</strong><strong>Y</strong></p>
<table style="text-align: center;width: 500px;height: 38px;cursor: default;border: #bbbbbb 0px dashed" border="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: left;margin: 8px;width: 50%;color: #000000;font-size: 11px;cursor: text;border: #ffffff 1px dashed;padding: 0.75pt" valign="top"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=271">Originality</a><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=270"></a></td>
<td style="margin: 8px;width: 50%;color: #000000;font-size: 11px;cursor: text;border: #ffffff 1px dashed;padding: 0.75pt" valign="top">
<p style="text-align: right" align="right">Gideon Parchomovsky  &amp; Alex Stein</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong>NOTE</strong></p>
<table style="text-align: center;width: 500px;height: 38px;cursor: default;border: #bbbbbb 0px dashed" border="0" cellpadding="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="text-align: left;margin: 8px;width: 50%;color: #000000;font-size: 11px;cursor: text;border: #ffffff 1px dashed;padding: 0.75pt" valign="top"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=270">Separate, But Equal? Virginia&#8217;s &#8220;Independent&#8221; Cities and the Purported Virtues of Voluntary Interlocal Agreements</a></td>
<td style="margin: 8px;width: 50%;color: #000000;font-size: 11px;cursor: text;border: #ffffff 1px dashed;padding: 0.75pt" valign="top">
<p style="text-align: right" align="right">David K. Roberts</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/virginia-law-review-956-october-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Law Review, Volume 78 Number 1 (October 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-1-october-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-1-october-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fordham Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
</p>



Volume 78

<p align="center">October 2009</p>


<p align="right">Number 1</p>




<p align="center">THE PHILIP D. REED LECTURE SERIES</p>
<p>Sanctions in Electronic Discovery Cases:  Views from the Judges
Panel Discussion</p>
<p align="center">ESSAY
</p>
<p>A Matter of Context:  Social Framework Evidence in Employment Discrimination Class Actions
Melissa Hart &#38; Paul M. Secunda</p>
<p align="center">ARTICLE
</p>
<p>Toward a Duty-Based Theory of Executive Power
David M. Driesen</p>
<p align="center">NOTES
</p>
<p>Post-Davis Conduit Bonds:  At the Intersection of the Dormant Commerce Clause and Municipal Debt
Sean Carey</p>
<p>Best Evidence and the Wayback Machine:  Toward a Workable Authentication Standard for Archived Internet Evidence
Deborah R. Eltgroth</p>
<p>&#8220;The Right of the People&#8221;:  The NSA, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance of Americans Overseas
Jonathan D. Forgang</p>
<p>What the Right Hand Gives:  Prohibitive Interpretations of the State Constitutional Right to Bail
Ariana Lindermayer</p>
<p>An Analysis of the Judicial Panel on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/fordham-law-review/7983.htm"><br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21298" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/fordhamlrev_header.jpg" border="0" alt="fordhamlrev_header" width="500" height="177" /></a></p>
<table align="center" style="width: 500px" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="167">Volume 78</td>
<td width="166">
<p align="center">October 2009</p>
</td>
<td width="167">
<p align="right">Number 1</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="center"><b>THE PHILIP D. REED LECTURE SERIES</b></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/ReedLecture_October_2009.pdf">Sanctions in Electronic Discovery Cases:  Views from the Judges</a><br />
Panel Discussion</p>
<p align="center"><b>ESSAY<br />
</b></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Hart_Secunda_October_2009.pdf">A Matter of Context:  Social Framework Evidence in Employment Discrimination Class Actions</a><br />
Melissa Hart &amp; Paul M. Secunda</p>
<p align="center"><b>ARTICLE<br />
</b></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Driesen_October_2009.pdf">Toward a Duty-Based Theory of Executive Power</a><br />
David M. Driesen</p>
<p align="center"><b>NOTES<br />
</b></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Carey_October_2009.pdf">Post-<em>Davis</em> Conduit Bonds:  At the Intersection of the Dormant Commerce Clause and Municipal Debt</a><br />
Sean Carey</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Eltgroth_October_2009.pdf">Best Evidence and the Wayback Machine:  Toward a Workable Authentication Standard for Archived Internet Evidence</a><br />
Deborah R. Eltgroth</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Forgang_October_2009.pdf">&#8220;The Right of the People&#8221;:  The NSA, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance of Americans Overseas</a><br />
Jonathan D. Forgang</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Lindermayer_October_2009.pdf">What the Right Hand Gives:  Prohibitive Interpretations of the State Constitutional Right to Bail</a><br />
Ariana Lindermayer</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Richards_October_2009.pdf">An Analysis of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation&#8217;s Selection of Transferee District and Judge</a><br />
Daniel A. Richards</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Scolnik_October_2009.pdf">Protections for Electronic Communications:  The Stored Communications Act and the Fourth Amendment</a><br />
Alexander Scolnik</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/VanOstrand_October_2009.pdf">A Close Look at ADEA Mixed-Motives Claims and <em>Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.</em></a><br />
Leigh A. Van Ostrand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-1-october-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Yale Law Journal Online</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/the-yale-law-online.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/the-yale-law-online.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 14:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Yale Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Yale)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School (Law Reviews)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>The Yale Law Journal is pleased to present its new online platform, The Yale Law Journal Online (http://www.yalelawjournal.org/).  YLJ Online will continue the Journal&#8217;s mission of providing accessible and substantive scholarship through the online medium.  It offers original essays on timely and novel legal developments and responses to articles in the print Journal, as well as adapted lectures and recordings/podcasts of featured pieces.</p>
<p>When the Journal launched The Pocket Part in 2005, it was the first law review to establish an original online companion; as the Journal nears its 120th anniversary, YLJ Online represents the next step in that endeavor.  The launch of YLJ Online&#8217;s original content section features an essay by Hiro N. Aragaki, addressing the Hall Street v. Mattel litigation and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.yalelawjournal.org"><img src="../wp-content/uploads/2009/10/yljonline-550x97.jpg" alt="yljonline" width="550" height="97" /></a></p>
<p><em>The Yale Law Journal</em> is pleased to present its new online platform,<em> The Yale Law Journal Online </em>(<a href="http://www.yalelawjournal.org">http://www.yalelawjournal.org/</a>).  <em>YLJ Online </em>will continue the <em>Journal</em>&#8217;s mission of providing accessible and substantive scholarship through the online medium.  It offers original essays on timely and novel legal developments and responses to articles in the print <em>Journal</em>, as well as adapted lectures and recordings/podcasts of featured pieces.</p>
<p>When the <em>Journal </em>launched <em>The Pocket Part </em>in 2005, it was the first law review to establish an original online companion; as the <em>Journal </em>nears its 120th anniversary, <em>YLJ Online</em> represents the next step in that endeavor.  The launch of <em>YLJ Online</em>&#8217;s original content section features an essay by Hiro N. Aragaki, addressing the H<em>all Street v. Mattel </em>litigation and manifest disregard, as well as responses by selected scholars to Michael Stokes Paulsen&#8217;s <em>The Constitutional Power To Interpret International Law</em> (118 Yale L.J. 1762 (2009)).</p>
<p>In the coming weeks, <em>YLJ Online</em> will present a variety of essays and features on marriage, property, and corporate law, as well as a selection of pieces from the Hon. J. Harvie Wilkinson III and other participants in its <a href="http://www.law.com/jsp/article.jsp?id=1202433962900">inaugural Washington, D.C. conference on the Supreme Court&#8217;s certiorari process</a>.  Among the many features that <em>YLJ Online </em>offers are Essays (4,000-6,000 words), Commentaries (under 2,000 words), Responses, adapted lectures and solicited pieces.  More information can be found on the Submissions page (<a href="http://www.yalelawjournal.org/submissions.html">http://www.yalelawjournal.org/submissions.html</a>).  All <em>YLJ Online </em>publications are available and fully searchable through LexisNexis and Westlaw.  The <em>Journal </em>also provides all<em> YLJ Online </em>pieces in PDF/reprint format, and podcasts on its website/iTunes for selected pieces.  For questions regarding <em>YLJ Online</em>, please contact the <em>Journal</em>&#8217;s Managing Online Editor, Jeff K. Lee, <a href="mailto:jeffrey.k.lee@yale.edu">here</a>.</p>
<p>Now available on <em>YLJ Online</em>:</p>
<p><em><strong>Essay</strong></em></p>
<p>Hiro N. Aragaki, <em>The Mess of Manifest Disregard</em>, 119 <span>Yale L.J. Online</span> 1 (2009). [<a href="http://yalelawjournal.org/2009/09/29/aragaki.html">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://www.yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/817.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em><strong>Responses</strong></em></p>
<p>Julian Ku, <em>The Prospects for the Peaceful Co-Existence of Constitutional and International Law</em>, 119 <span>Yale L.J. Online 15 (2009</span>). [<a href="http://yalelawjournal.org/2009/09/29/ku.html">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://www.yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/820.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Peter J. Spiro, <em>Wishing International Law Away</em>, 119 <span>Yale L.J. Online 23 (2009)</span>. [<a href="http://yalelawjournal.org/2009/09/29/spiro.html">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://www.yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/821.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Margaret E. McGuinness, <em>Old W(h)ine, Old Bottles: A Response to Professor Paulsen</em>, 119 Yale L.J. Online 31 (2009). [<a href="http://yalelawjournal.org/2009/09/29/mcguinness.html">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://www.yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/819.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Robert Ahdieh, <em>The Fog of Certainty</em>, 119 <span>Yale L.J. Online 41 (2009)</span>. [<a href="http://www.yalelawjournal.org/2009/09/29/ahdieh.html">HTML</a>] [<a href="http://www.yalelawjournal.org/images/pdfs/818.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/the-yale-law-online.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:4 (September 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-504-september-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-504-september-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:4 (September 2009)
</p>
<p>Remarks
</p>
<p>Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, Flexibility and Optimism in an Unpredictable World, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 941 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>Miriam Hechler Baer, Governing Corporate Compliance, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 949 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Lawrence A. Hamermesh &#38; Michael L. Wachter, Rationalizing Appraisal Standards in Compulsory Buyouts, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1021 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Carissa Byrne Hessick, Ineffective Assistance at Sentencing, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1069 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Gary Lawson &#38; Robert D. Sloane, The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico&#8217;s Legal Status Reconsidered, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1123 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Jesse H. Alderman, Crying Wolf: The Unlawful Delisting of Northern Rocky Mountain Gray Wolves from Endangered Species Act Protections, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1195 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Adam M. Leamon, Section 108 of the I.R.C. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg" alt="Boston College Law Review Logo" /></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:4 (September 2009)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Remarks</b>
</p>
<p>Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, <i>Flexibility and Optimism in an Unpredictable World</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 941 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/01_bernanke.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Miriam Hechler Baer, <i>Governing Corporate Compliance</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 949 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/02_baer.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Lawrence A. Hamermesh &amp; Michael L. Wachter, <i>Rationalizing Appraisal Standards in Compulsory Buyouts</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1021 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/03_hamermesh%20%26%20wachter.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Carissa Byrne Hessick, <i>Ineffective Assistance at Sentencing</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1069 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/04_hessick.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Gary Lawson &amp; Robert D. Sloane, <i>The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico&#8217;s Legal Status Reconsidered</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1123 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/05_lawson-sloane.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Jesse H. Alderman, <i>Crying Wolf: The Unlawful Delisting of Northern Rocky Mountain Gray Wolves from Endangered Species Act Protections</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1195 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/06_alderman.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Adam M. Leamon, <i>Section 108 of the I.R.C. and the Inclusion of </i>Tufts<i> Gain: A Proposal for Reform</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1243 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/07_leamon.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Caitlin M. Mulligan, <i>From AAA to F: How the Credit Rating Agencies Failed America and What Can Be Done to Protect Investors</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1275 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/08_mulligan.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-504-september-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia Law Review 95:5 (September 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/virginia-law-review-955-september-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/virginia-law-review-955-september-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:27:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Virginia)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center">VOLUME 95      SEPTEMBER 2009     ISSUE 5</p>
<p style="text-align: center"></p>
<p style="text-align: center">Virginia Law Review 95:5 (September 2009)</p>
<p style="text-align: center">ARTICLES</p>



Standing for the Public: A Lost History

<p align="right">M. Elizabeth Magill</p>



Full Faith and Credit in the Early Congress
Stephen E. Sachs



<p style="text-align: center">NOTES</p>



Is O Centro Really A Sign of Hope for RFRA Claimants?

<p align="right">Matt Nicholson</p>



The Hapless Ecosystem: A Federalist Argument in Favor of an Ecosystem Approach to the Endangered Species Act
Scott Schwartz



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center"><strong><span style="font-size: small">VOLUME 95      SEPTEMBER 2009     ISSUE 5</span></strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/rotunda3.gif" alt="" width="189" height="154" /></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?issue=55"><span style="font-size: small">Virginia Law Review 95:5 (September 2009)</span></a></p>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong><span style="font-size: small">ARTICLES</span></strong></p>
<table style="width: 90%" border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 50%;padding: 0.75pt" width="50%"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=255"><span style="font-size: small">Standing for the Public: A Lost History</span></a></td>
<td style="width: 50%;padding: 0.75pt" width="50%">
<p align="right"><span style="font-size: small">M. Elizabeth Magill</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 49.7%;padding: 0.75pt" width="49%"><a></a><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=245"><span style="font-size: small">Full Faith and Credit in the Early Congress</span></a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 49.7%;padding: 0.75pt" width="49%"><span style="font-size: small">Stephen E. Sachs</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="text-align: center"><strong><span style="font-size: small">NOTES</span></strong></p>
<table style="width: 90%" border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 50%;padding: 0.75pt" width="50%"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=274"><span style="font-size: small">Is O Centro Really A Sign of Hope for RFRA Claimants?</span></a></td>
<td style="width: 50%;padding: 0.75pt" width="50%">
<p align="right"><span style="font-size: small">Matt Nicholson</span></p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 49.7%;padding: 0.75pt" width="49%"><a></a><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=275"><span style="font-size: small">The Hapless Ecosystem: A Federalist Argument in Favor of an Ecosystem Approach to the Endangered Species Act</span></a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 49.7%;padding: 0.75pt" width="49%"><span style="font-size: small">Scott Schwartz</span></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/virginia-law-review-955-september-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 6 (September 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-6-september-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-6-september-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 6 (September 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>  Taking a Stand on Taking the Stand: The Effect of a Prior Criminal Record on the Decision to Testify and on Trial Outcomes
Theodore Eisenberg &#38; Valerie P. Hans</p>
<p>Identifying Intense Preferences
Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Reducing the Unfair Effects of Nonmutual Issue Preclusion Through Damages Limits
Steven P. Nonkes</p>
<p>Inquiry Notice Gone Awry: A Doctrine Abused in DeBenedictis v. Merrill Lynch
Joseph Robertson</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Current-Issue.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 6 (September 2009)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><span> </span> <a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Eisenberg-Hans-final.pdf">Taking a Stand on Taking the Stand: The Effect of a Prior Criminal Record on the Decision to Testify and on Trial Outcomes</a><br />
<em><span>Theodore Eisenberg &amp; Valerie P. Hans</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Lewinsohn-Zamir-final.pdf">Identifying Intense Preferences</a><br />
<em><span>Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Notes</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Nonkes-final.pdf">Reducing the Unfair Effects of Nonmutual Issue Preclusion Through Damages Limits</a><br />
<em><span>Steven P. Nonkes</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Robertson-final.pdf">Inquiry Notice Gone Awry: A Doctrine Abused in <em><span>DeBenedictis v. Merrill Lynch</span></em></a><br />
<em><span>Joseph Robertson</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-6-september-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa Law Review, Volume 94, Issue 5 (July 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/iowa-law-review-volume-94-issue-5-july-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/iowa-law-review-volume-94-issue-5-july-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 16:35:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Iowa)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School (Law Reviews)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20214</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>CRITICAL RACE THEORY SPEAKER SERIES
CRT 20: HONORING OUR PAST, CHARTING OUR FUTURE</p>
<p>Introduction</p>


<p>Celebrating Critical Race Theory at 20
Angela Onwuachi-Willig</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Liberal McCarthyism and the Origins of Critical Race Theory
Richard Delgado</p>
<p>The Re-Emergence of Race as a Biological Category: The Societal Implications—Reaffirmation of Race
Alex M. Johnson, Jr.</p>
<p>Post-Racialism
Sumi Cho</p>
<p>Jim Crow Ethics and the Defense of the Jena Six
Anthony V. Alfieri</p>
<p>Notes

<p>The Branding of America: The Rise of Geographic Trademarks and the Need for a Strong Fair Use Defense
Joseph C. Daniels</p>
<p>There’s “No Such Thing as Too Much Speech”: How Advertising Deregulation and the Marketplace of Ideas Can Protect Democracy in America
Kristen M. Formanek</p>
<p>The Antifraud Savings Clause of the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996
Evan J. Leitch</p>
<p>Real Estate Causes Real Problems for Investors: Regulating Executive Liquidation of Stock Options as a Source of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Iowa Law Review" href="http://www.uiowa.edu/~ilr/"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/Iowa%20Law%20Review%20Banner.jpg" alt="Iowa Law Review Banner.jpg" width="540" height="119" /></a></p>
<p><strong>CRITICAL RACE THEORY SPEAKER SERIES<br />
CRT 20: HONORING OUR PAST, CHARTING OUR FUTURE</strong></p>
<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<div>
<div>
<p><em><a href="http://www.uiowa.edu/~ilr/Issue PDFs/ILR_94-5_Onwuachi-Willig.pdf">Celebrating Critical Race Theory at 20</a></em><br />
Angela Onwuachi-Willig</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.uiowa.edu/~ilr/Issue PDFs/ILR_94-5_Delgado.pdf">Liberal McCarthyism and the Origins of Critical Race Theory</a></em><br />
Richard Delgado</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.uiowa.edu/~ilr/Issue PDFs/ILR_94-5_Johnson.pdf">The Re-Emergence of Race as a Biological Category: The Societal Implications—Reaffirmation of Race<br />
</a></em>Alex M. Johnson, Jr.</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.uiowa.edu/~ilr/Issue PDFs/ILR_94-5_Cho.pdf">Post-Racialism</a></em><br />
Sumi Cho</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.uiowa.edu/~ilr/Issue PDFs/ILR_94-5_Alfieri.pdf">Jim Crow Ethics and the Defense of the Jena Six</a></em><br />
Anthony V. Alfieri</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></div>
<div>
<p><em><a href="http://www.uiowa.edu/~ilr/Issue PDFs/ILR_94-5_Daniels.pdf">The Branding of America: The Rise of Geographic Trademarks and the Need for a Strong Fair Use Defense<br />
</a></em>Joseph C. Daniels</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.uiowa.edu/~ilr/Issue PDFs/ILR_94-5_Formanek.pdf">There’s “No Such Thing as Too Much Speech”: How Advertising Deregulation and the Marketplace of Ideas Can Protect Democracy in America<br />
</a></em>Kristen M. Formanek</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.uiowa.edu/~ilr/Issue PDFs/ILR_94-5_Leitch.pdf">The Antifraud Savings Clause of the National Securities Markets Improvement Act of 1996</a></em><br />
Evan J. Leitch</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.uiowa.edu/~ilr/Issue PDFs/ILR_94-5_Reighard.pdf">Real Estate Causes Real Problems for Investors: Regulating Executive Liquidation of Stock Options as a Source of Real-Estate Financing<br />
</a></em>Lindsey A. Reighard</div>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/iowa-law-review-volume-94-issue-5-july-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Iowa Law Review, Volume 94, Issue 4 (May 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/08/iowa-law-review-volume-94-issue-4-may-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/08/iowa-law-review-volume-94-issue-4-may-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 19:46:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Iowa Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Iowa)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School (Law Reviews)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=19318</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Saving Facebook
James Grimmelmann</p>
<p>Attempt by Omission
Michael T. Cahill</p>
<p>Strange Bedfellows: Criminal Law, Family Law, and the Legal Construction of Intimate Life
Melissa Murray</p>
<p>Insider Trading and the Gradual Demise of Fiduciary Principles
Donna M. Nagy</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Corporate Liability for Violations of Labor Rights Under the Alien Tort Claims Act
Wesley V. Carrington</p>
<p>The Right and Wrong Ways to Sell A Public Forum
John C. Crees</p>
<p>Searching for a Solution: A Proposed Change to the Code of Iowa Chapter 808A
Morgan N. Engling</p>
<p>Nonprofits: Are You at Risk of Losing Your Tax-Exempt Status?
Gina M. Lavarda</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a title="Iowa Law Review" href="http://www.law.uiowa.edu/journals/ilr/ILRhome.html"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/Iowa%20Law%20Review%20Banner.jpg" alt="Iowa Law Review Banner.jpg" width="540" height="119" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.law.uiowa.edu/journals/ilr/Issue%20PDFs/ILR_94-4_Grimmelmann.pdf">Saving Facebook<br />
</a></em>James Grimmelmann</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.law.uiowa.edu/journals/ilr/Issue%20PDFs/ILR_94-4_Cahill.pdf">Attempt by Omission<br />
</a></em>Michael T. Cahill</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.law.uiowa.edu/journals/ilr/Issue%20PDFs/ILR_94-4_Murray.pdf">Strange Bedfellows: Criminal Law, Family Law, and the Legal Construction of Intimate Life<br />
</a></em>Melissa Murray</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.law.uiowa.edu/journals/ilr/Issue%20PDFs/ILR_94-4_Nagy.pdf">Insider Trading and the Gradual Demise of Fiduciary Principles</a><br />
</em>Donna M. Nagy</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.law.uiowa.edu/journals/ilr/Issue%20PDFs/ILR_94-4_Carrington.pdf">Corporate Liability for Violations of Labor Rights Under the Alien Tort Claims Act<br />
</a></em>Wesley V. Carrington</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.law.uiowa.edu/journals/ilr/Issue%20PDFs/ILR_94-4_Crees.pdf">The Right and Wrong Ways to Sell A Public Forum</a><br />
</em>John C. Crees</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.law.uiowa.edu/journals/ilr/Issue%20PDFs/ILR_94-4_Engling.pdf">Searching for a Solution: A Proposed Change to the Code of Iowa Chapter 808A</a><br />
</em>Morgan N. Engling</p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.law.uiowa.edu/journals/ilr/Issue%20PDFs/ILR_94-4_Lavarda.pdf">Nonprofits: Are You at Risk of Losing Your Tax-Exempt Status?<br />
</a></em>Gina M. Lavarda</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/08/iowa-law-review-volume-94-issue-4-may-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 5 (July 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/08/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-5-july-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/08/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-5-july-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=18813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 5 (July 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>The Law, Economics and Psychology of Subprime Mortgage Contracts
Oren Bar-Gill</p>
<p>Super Wicked Problems and Climate Change: Restraining the Present to Liberate the Future
Richard J. Lazarus</p>
<p>Regulating Funny: Humor and the Law
Laura E. Little</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Alternate Remedies &#38; The False Claims Act: Protecting Qui Tam Relators in Light of Government Intervention and Criminal Prosecution Decisions
Thomas L. Harris</p>
<p>Defining the Contours of United States v. Hensley: Limiting the Use of Terry Stops for Completed Misdemeanors
Rachel S. Weiss</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Current-Issue.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 5 (July 2009)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Bar-Gill.pdf">The Law, Economics and Psychology of Subprime Mortgage Contracts</a><br />
<em><span>Oren Bar-Gill</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Lazarus.pdf">Super Wicked Problems and Climate Change: Restraining the Present to Liberate the Future</a><br />
<em><span>Richard J. Lazarus</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Little-2.pdf">Regulating Funny: Humor and the Law</a><br />
<em><span>Laura E. Little</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Notes</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Harris-2.pdf">Alternate Remedies &amp; The False Claims Act: Protecting Qui Tam Relators in Light of Government Intervention and Criminal Prosecution Decisions</a><br />
<em><span>Thomas L. Harris</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Weiss-2.pdf">Defining the Contours of <span>United States v. Hensley</span>: Limiting the Use of Terry Stops for Completed Misdemeanors</a><br />
<em><span>Rachel S. Weiss</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/08/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-5-july-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>New York University Law Review, 84:3 (June 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/new-york-university-law-review-843-june-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/new-york-university-law-review-843-june-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:13:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>NYU Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=18447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[










Volume 84
June 2009
Number 3



TRIBUTES</p>
<p>Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye</p>
<p>Chief Judge Kaye:  A Creative Reformer</p>
<p>The Honorable Stephen G. Breyer</p>
<p>Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye:  A Modern-Day Arthur Vanderbilt</p>
<p>Samuel Estreicher &#38; Oscar G. Chase </p>
<p>In Praise of Judith S. Kaye </p>
<p>The Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg</p>
<p>Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye:  A Visionary Third Branch Leader</p>
<p>The Honorable Jonathan Lippman</p>
<p>A Distinguished Path in Public Service</p>
<p>The Honorable Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor</p>
<p>Not a Mute Swan</p>
<p>Ellen Schall</p>
<p>Judith Kaye as a Chief Among Chiefs</p>
<p>The Honorable Randall T. Shepard</p>
<p>Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye:  Proud to Call Her One of Our Own</p>
<p>Richard L. Revesz</p>
<p>A Portrait of Judith S. Kaye</p>
<p>The Honorable Richard C. Wesley </p>
<p>MADISON LECTURE</p>
<p>Securing Fragile Foundations:  Affirmative Constitutional Adjudication in Federal Courts</p>
<p>The Honorable Marsha S. Berzon</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>Myth of Mess?  International Choice of Law [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<table style="width: 100%;" border="0" bgcolor="#111d5f">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td align="center"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/nyulrevbanner.jpg" alt="New York University Law Review" width="519" height="150" /></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr />
<table style="width: 100%;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="33%" align="left">Volume 84</td>
<td width="33%" align="center">June 2009</td>
<td width="33%" align="right">Number 3</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<hr /><strong>TRIBUTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062383.pdf">Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye</a></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062384.pdf">Chief Judge Kaye:  A Creative Reformer</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Stephen G. Breyer</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062385.pdf">Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye:  A Modern-Day Arthur Vanderbilt</a></p>
<p><em>Samuel Estreicher &amp; Oscar G. Chase </em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062392.pdf">In Praise of Judith S. Kaye </a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Ruth Bader Ginsburg</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062393.pdf">Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye:  A Visionary Third Branch Leader</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Jonathan Lippman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062394.pdf">A Distinguished Path in Public Service</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Sandra Day O&#8217;Connor</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062396.pdf">Not a Mute Swan</a></p>
<p><em>Ellen Schall</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062397.pdf">Judith Kaye as a Chief Among Chiefs</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Randall T. Shepard</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062395.pdf">Chief Judge Judith S. Kaye:  Proud to Call Her One of Our Own</a></p>
<p><em>Richard L. Revesz</em></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062398.pdf">A Portrait of Judith S. Kaye</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Richard C. Wesley </em></p>
<p><strong>MADISON LECTURE</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062378.pdf">Securing Fragile Foundations:  Affirmative Constitutional Adjudication in Federal Courts</a></p>
<p><em>The Honorable Marsha S. Berzon</em></p>
<p><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062379.pdf">Myth of Mess?  International Choice of Law in Action</a></p>
<p><em>Christopher A. Whytock</em></p>
<p><strong>ESSAYS</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062380.pdf">Rethinking the Federal Role in State Criminal Justice</a></p>
<p><em>Joseph L. Hoffman &amp; Nancy J. King</em></p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.nyu.edu/ecm_dlv2/groups/public/@nyu_law_website__journals__law_review/documents/documents/ecm_pro_062381.pdf">In Search of an Enforceable Medical Malpractice Exculpatory Agreement:  Introducting Confidential Contracts as a Solution to the Doctor-Patient Relationship Problem </a></p>
<p><em>Matthew J.B. Lawrence</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/new-york-university-law-review-843-june-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Virginia Law Review 95:4 (June 2009): The SEC in a Time of Discontinuity</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/virginia-law-review-954-june-2009-the-sec-in-a-time-of-discontinuity.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/virginia-law-review-954-june-2009-the-sec-in-a-time-of-discontinuity.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 20:44:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Virginia Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Virginia)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=18145</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;">VOLUME 95      JUNE 2009     ISSUE 4</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"> </p>
<p style="text-align: center;">Virginia Law Review 95:4 (June 2009)</p>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: center;">Symposium Issue: The SEC in a Time of Discontinuity</p>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: left;">



The SEC in a Time of Discontinuity: Introduction to Virginia Law Review Symposium

<p class="style5" style="text-align: right;" align="right">Joel Seligman</p>




<p class="style7" style="text-align: center;">ARTICLES</p>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: left;">



The Race for the Bottom in Corporate Governance

<p class="style5" style="text-align: right;" align="right">Frank H. Easterbrook</p>




<p class="style7"></p>
<p>Redesigning the SEC: Does the Treasury Have a Better Idea?


<p style="text-align: right;">John C. Coffee, Jr. and Hillary A. Sale </p>



Top Cop or Regulatory Flop? The SEC at 75
Jill E. Fisch


Commentary On Redesigning The Sec: Does The Treasury Have A Better Idea?
Steven M.H. Wallman


Securities Law and the New Deal Justices
A.C. Pritchard and Robert B. Thompson



<p class="style7" style="text-align: center;">ESSAY</p>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: left;">



The Securities [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>VOLUME 95      JUNE 2009     ISSUE 4</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/rotunda3.gif" alt="" width="189" height="154" /> </p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?issue=54">Virginia Law Review 95:4 (June 2009)</a></p>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: center;"><strong>Symposium Issue: The SEC in a Time of Discontinuity</strong></p>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: left;">
<table style="width: 90%;" border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 50%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="50%"><span class="list_title"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=264">The SEC in a Time of Discontinuity: Introduction to Virginia Law Review Symposium</a></span><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=222"></a></td>
<td style="width: 50%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="50%">
<p class="style5" style="text-align: right;" align="right">Joel Seligman</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: center;"><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: left;">
<table style="width: 90%;" border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 50%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="50%"><span class="list_title"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=263">The Race for the Bottom in Corporate Governance</a></span><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=222"></a></td>
<td style="width: 50%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="50%">
<p class="style5" style="text-align: right;" align="right">Frank H. Easterbrook</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 49.7%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="49%">
<p class="style7"><span class="listtitlestyle5"><a></a></span></p>
<p><span class="list_title"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=260">Redesigning the SEC: Does the Treasury Have a Better Idea?</a></span><br />
<a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=225"></a></td>
<td style="width: 49.7%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="49%">
<p style="text-align: right;">John C. Coffee, Jr. and Hillary A. Sale </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="list_title"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=259">Top Cop or Regulatory Flop? The SEC at 75</a></span></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">Jill E. Fisch</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="list_title"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=285">Commentary On Redesigning The Sec: Does The Treasury Have A Better Idea?</a></span></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">Steven M.H. Wallman</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="list_title"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=250">Securities Law and the New Deal Justices</a></span></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">A.C. Pritchard and Robert B. Thompson</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: center;"><strong>ESSAY</strong></p>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: left;">
<table style="width: 90%;" border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 50%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="50%"><span class="list_title"><span class="list_title"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=268">The Securities Laws and the Mechanics of Legal Change</a></span></span><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=222"></a></td>
<td style="width: 50%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="50%">
<p class="style5" style="text-align: right;" align="right">Barry Cushman</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: center;"><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: left;">
<table style="width: 90%;" border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 50%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="50%"><span class="list_title"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=261">Coping in a Global Marketplace: Survival Strategies for a 75-Year-Old SEC</a></span><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=222"></a></td>
<td style="width: 50%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="50%">
<p class="style5" style="text-align: right;" align="right">James D. Cox</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 49.7%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="49%">
<p class="style7"><span class="listtitlestyle5"><a></a></span></p>
<p><span class="list_title"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=262">Treatment Differences and Political Realities in the GAAP-IFRS Debate</a></span><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=225"></a></td>
<td style="width: 49.7%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="49%">
<p style="text-align: right;">William W. Bratton and Lawrence A. Cunningham </p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><span class="list_title"><span class="list_title"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=267">The SEC, Retail Investors, and the Institutionalization of the Securities Markets</a></span><a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-admin/articles.php?article=259"></a></span></td>
<td style="text-align: right;">Donald C. Langevoort</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: center;"><strong>ESSAYS</strong></p>
<p class="style7" style="text-align: left;">
<table style="width: 90%;" border="0" cellpadding="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="width: 50%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="50%"><span class="list_title"><span class="list_title"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=265">Whither the SEC Now?</a></span></span><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=222"></a></td>
<td style="width: 50%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="50%">
<p class="style5" style="text-align: right;" align="right">Brian G. Cartwright</p>
</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="width: 49.7%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="49%">
<p class="style7"><span class="listtitlestyle5"><a></a></span></p>
<p><span class="list_title"><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=266">A Requiem for the Retail Investor?</a></span><a href="http://virginialawreview.org/articles.php?article=225"></a></td>
<td style="width: 49.7%; padding: 0.75pt;" width="49%">
<p style="text-align: right;">Alicia Davis Evans </p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/virginia-law-review-954-june-2009-the-sec-in-a-time-of-discontinuity.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Law Review 93:6 (June 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/minnesota-law-review-936-june-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/minnesota-law-review-936-june-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 14:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minnesota Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Minnesota)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=18118</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Now that the Minnesota Law Review has moved to its new internet home, Minnesota Law Review Headnotes, we will begin clearing our backlog of Table of Contents entries covering the past year of publication. With this entry, we are now entirely up to date. We look forward to making our articles available on Concurring Opinions in the coming academic year.</p>
<p>Volume 93, Issue 6 (June 2009):</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Pamela Samuelson, Are Patents on Interfaces Impeding Interoperability?, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1943 (2009)</p>
<p>Nathan B. Oman, Specific Performance and the Thirteenth Amendment, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 2020 (2009)</p>
<p>Ilya Somin, The Limits of Backlash: Assessing the Political Response to Kelo, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 2100 (2009)</p>
<p>Review Essay</p>
<p>Michael J. Gerhardt, How a Judge Thinks, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 2185 (2009)</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>David A. Couillard, Note, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-15965 alignnone" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/minnesota-logo2.bmp" alt="minnesota-logo2" width="183" height="124" /></p>
<p>Now that the <em>Minnesota Law Review</em> has moved to its new internet home, <a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org"><em>Minnesota Law Review Headnotes</em></a>, we will begin clearing our backlog of Table of Contents entries covering the past year of publication. With this entry, we are now entirely up to date. We look forward to making our articles available on <em>Concurring Opinions</em> in the coming academic year.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/epublish/1/27"><strong>Volume 93, Issue 6 (June 2009):</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/are-patents-interfaces-impeding-interoperability">Pamela Samuelson, <em>Are Patents on Interfaces Impeding Interoperability?</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1943 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/specific-performance-and-thirteenth-amendment">Nathan B. Oman, <em>Specific Performance and the Thirteenth Amendment</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 2020 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/limits-backlash-assessing-political-response-kelo">Ilya Somin, <em>The Limits of Backlash: Assessing the Political Response to </em>Kelo, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 2100 (2009)</a></p>
<p><strong>Review Essay</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/review-essay-how-judge-thinks">Michael J. Gerhardt, <em>How a Judge Thinks</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 2185 (2009)</a></p>
<p><strong>Notes<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/note-defogging-cloud-applying-fourth-amendment-principles-evolving-privacy-expectations-clou">David A. Couillard, Note, <em>Defogging the Cloud: Applying Fourth Amendment Principles to Evolving Privacy Expectations in Cloud Computing</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 2205 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/note-cramming-down-housing-crisis-amending-11-usc-1322b-protect-homeowners-and-create-sustai">Nina Liao, Note, <em>Cramming Down the Housing Crisis: Amending 11 U.S.C. 1322(b) to Protect Homeowners and Create a Sustainable Bankruptcy System</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 2240 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/note-inequitable-conduct-doctrine-reform-death-penalty-patents-still-appropriate">Nicole M. Murphy, Note, <em>Inequitable-Conduct Doctrine Reform: Is the Death Penalty for Patents Still Appropriate?</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 2274 (2009)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/minnesota-law-review-936-june-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Minnesota Law Review 93:5 (May 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/minnesota-law-review-935-may-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/minnesota-law-review-935-may-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 12:00:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Minnesota Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Minnesota)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=17957</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Now that the Minnesota Law Review has moved to its new internet home, Minnesota Law Review Headnotes, we will begin clearing our backlog of Table of Contents entries covering the past year of publication. We will be bringing our entries up to date over the next few weeks.</p>
<p>Volume 93, Issue 5 (May 2009): </p>
<p>2008 Symposium: Law &#38; Politics in the 21st Century</p>
<p>Jeffrey P. Justman, Symposium Foreward: Law &#38; Politics in the 21st Century, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1447 (2009)</p>
<p>Brett M. Kavanaugh, Separation of Powers in the Fourty-Fourth Presidency and Beyond, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1454 (2009)</p>
<p>Benjamin Wittes, Judicial Nominations in an Umpireless Game: Trusted Sources, a Complaint, and a Proposal, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1487 (2009)</p>
<p>Thomas Brennan, Lee Epstein &#38; Nancy Staudt, The Political Economy [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="size-full wp-image-15965 alignnone" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/05/minnesota-logo2.bmp" alt="minnesota-logo2" width="183" height="124" /></p>
<p>Now that the <em>Minnesota Law Review</em> has moved to its new internet home, <a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org"><em>Minnesota Law Review Headnotes</em></a>, we will begin clearing our backlog of Table of Contents entries covering the past year of publication. We will be bringing our entries up to date over the next few weeks.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/law-review"><strong>Volume 93, Issue 5 (May 2009): </strong></a></p>
<p><em><strong>2008 Symposium: Law &amp; Politics in the 21st Century</strong></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/symposium-foreward-law-politics-21st-century">Jeffrey P. Justman, <em>Symposium Foreward: Law &amp; Politics in the 21st Century</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1447 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/separation-powers-forty-fourth-presidency-and-beyond">Brett M. Kavanaugh, <em>Separation of Powers in the Fourty-Fourth Presidency and Beyond</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1454 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/judicial-nominations-umpireless-game-trusted-sources-complaint-and-proposal">Benjamin Wittes, <em>Judicial Nominations in an Umpireless Game: Trusted Sources, a Complaint, and a Proposal</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1487 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/political-economy-judging">Thomas Brennan, Lee Epstein &amp; Nancy Staudt, <em>The Political Economy of Judging</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1503 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/dissents-against-type">Ward Farnsworth, <em>Dissents Against Type</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1535 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/hear-me-roar-what-provokes-supreme-court-justices-dissent-bench">Timothy R. Johnson, Ryan C. Black &amp; Eve M. Ringsmuth, <em>Hear Me Roar: What Provokes Supreme Court Justices to Dissent from the Bench</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1560 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/shortcuts-reform">Heather K. Gerkin, <em>Shortcuts to Reform</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1582 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/withdrawal-roberts-court-and-retreat-election-law">Ellen Katz, <em>Withdrawal: The Roberts Court and the Retreat from Election Law</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1615 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/defacing-democracy-changing-nature-and-rising-importance-applied-challenges-supreme-courts-r">Nathaniel Persily &amp; Jennifer S. Rosenberg, <em>Defacing Democracy?: The Changing Nature and Rising Importance of As-Applied Challenges in the Supreme Court&#8217;s Recent Election-Law Decisions</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1644 (2009) </a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/disappearing-districts-minority-vote-dilution-doctrine-politics">Terry Smith, <em>Disappearing Districts: Minority Vote Dilution Doctrine as Politics</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1680 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/fatally-flawed-theory-unbundled-executive">Steven G. Calabresi &amp; Nicholas Terrell, <em>The Fatally Flawed Theory of the Unbundled Executive</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1696 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/accountable-executive">Heidi Kitrosser, <em>The Accountable Executive</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1741 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/wartime-judgments-presidential-power-striking-down-not-back">William G. Howell, <em>Wartime Judgments of Presidential Power: Striking Down but not Back</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1778 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/shaping-supreme-court-policy-through-appointments-impact-new-justice">Charles Cameron &amp; Jee-Kwang Park, with Deborah Beim, <em>Shaping Supreme Court Policy Through Appointments: The Impact of a New Justice</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1820 (2009)</a></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/note-murder-and-military-commissions-prohibiting-executives-unauthorized-expansion-jurisdict">Joseph C. Hansen, Note, <em>Murder and the Military Commissions: Prohibiting the Executive&#8217;s Unauthorized Expansion of Jurisdiction</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1871 (2009)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.minnesotalawreview.org/content/note-native-american-rape-victims-desperately-seeking-oliphant-fix">Marie Quasius, Note, <em>Native American Rape Victims: Desperately Seeking an </em>Oliphant-<em>Fix</em>, 93 Minn. L. Rev. 1902 (2009)</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/minnesota-law-review-935-may-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Columbia Law Review, Volume 109 Issue 4 (May 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/columbia-law-review-volume-109-issue-4-may-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/columbia-law-review-volume-109-issue-4-may-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 17:25:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Columbia Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Columbia)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16829</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Columbia Law Review, Volume 109 Issue 4 (May 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>An Aggregate Approach to Antitrust:  Using New Data and Rulemaking to Preserve Drug Competition</p>
<p>C. Scott Hemphill</p>
<p>Revealing Choices:  Using Taxpayer Choice to Target Tax Enforcement</p>
<p>Alex Raskolnikov</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Between Healthy and Hartman:  Probable Cause in Retaliatory Arrest Cases </p>
<p>The Lorax State:  Parens Patriae and the Provision of Public Goods</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Federalization Snowballs:  The Need for National Action in Medical Malpractice Reform</p>
<p>Abigail R. Moncrieff</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/CLR-logo2.jpg" alt="CLR-logo2jpg" width="436" height="150" /></p>
<p><a href="http://columbialawreview.org/issues?issue=157&amp;commit=GO">Columbia Law Review, Volume 109 Issue 4 (May 2009)</a></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://columbialawreview.org/articles/an-aggregate-approach-to-antitrust-using-new-data-and-rulemaking-to-preserve-drug-competition">An Aggregate Approach to Antitrust:  Using New Data and Rulemaking to Preserve Drug Competition</a></p>
<p><em>C. Scott Hemphill</em></p>
<p><a href="http://columbialawreview.org/articles/revealing-choices-using-taxpayer-choice-to-target-tax-enforcement">Revealing Choices:  Using Taxpayer Choice to Target Tax Enforcement</a></p>
<p><em>Alex Raskolnikov</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://columbialawreview.org/articles/between-i-healthy-i-and-i-hartman-i-probable-cause-in-retaliatory-arrest-cases">Between <em>Healthy</em> and <em>Hartman</em>:  Probable Cause in Retaliatory Arrest Cases </a></p>
<p><a href="http://columbialawreview.org/articles/the-lorax-state-parens-patriae-and-the-provision-of-public-goods">The Lorax State:  Parens Patriae and the Provision of Public Goods</a></p>
<p><strong>Essay</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://columbialawreview.org/articles/federalization-snowballs-the-need-for-national-action-in-medical-malpractice-reform">Federalization Snowballs:  The Need for National Action in Medical Malpractice Reform</a></p>
<p><em>Abigail R. Moncrieff</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/columbia-law-review-volume-109-issue-4-may-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 62, Number 4 (May 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/vanderbilt-law-review-volume-62-number-4-may-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/vanderbilt-law-review-volume-62-number-4-may-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Jun 2009 20:03:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Vanderbilt Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Vanderbilt)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=17504</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 62, Number 4 (May 2009)</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">ARTICLES</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Kristin A. Collins, Administering Marriage: Marriage-Based Entitlements, Bureaucracy, and the Legal Construction of the Family, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1085 (2009).</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Kevin M. Stack, The Reviewability of the President’s Statutory Powers, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1171 (2009).</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">ESSAY</p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;">Grant Hayden &#38; Matthew Bodie, Arrow’s Theorem and the Exclusive Shareholder Franchise, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-17517" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/vlr3.jpg" alt="vlr3" width="397" height="123" /> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><a href="http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/vanderbilt-law-review/index.aspx">Vanderbilt Law Review</a>, Volume 62, Number 4 (May 2009)</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ARTICLES</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Kristin A. Collins, </span><a href="http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/vanderbilt-law-review/archive/volume-62-number-4-may-2009/index.aspx"><span style="font-size: medium;">Administering Marriage: Marriage-Based Entitlements, Bureaucracy, and the Legal Construction of the Family</span></a><span style="font-size: medium;">, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1085 (2009).</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Kevin M. Stack, </span><a href="http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/vanderbilt-law-review/archive/volume-62-number-4-may-2009/index.aspx"><span style="font-size: medium;">The Reviewability of the President’s Statutory Powers</span></a><span style="font-size: medium;">, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1171 (2009).</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">ESSAY</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Grant Hayden &amp; Matthew Bodie, </span><a href="http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/vanderbilt-law-review/archive/volume-62-number-4-may-2009/index.aspx"><span style="font-size: medium;">Arrow’s Theorem and the Exclusive Shareholder Franchise</span></a><span style="font-size: medium;">, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1217 (2009).</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">NOTES</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Lauren Lowe, </span><a href="http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/vanderbilt-law-review/archive/volume-62-number-4-may-2009/index.aspx"><span style="font-size: medium;">What Employees Say, or What Employers Do: How Post-<em>Cleveland</em> Decisions Continue to Obscure Discrimination</span></a><span style="font-size: medium;">, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1245 (2009).</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">John Benjamin Schrader, </span><a href="http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/vanderbilt-law-review/archive/volume-62-number-4-may-2009/index.aspx"><span style="font-size: medium;">Reawakening “Privileges or Immunities”: An Originalist Blueprint for Invalidating State Felon Disenfranchisement Laws</span></a><span style="font-size: medium;">, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1285 (2009).</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;"> </span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Charles Thompson Switzer, </span><a href="http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/vanderbilt-law-review/archive/volume-62-number-4-may-2009/index.aspx"><span style="font-size: medium;">Escaping the Takings Maze: Impact Fees and the Limits of the Takings Clause</span></a><span style="font-size: medium;">, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1315 (2009).</span></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"> </p>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin: 0in 0in 0pt;"><span style="font-size: small; font-family: Times New Roman;"><span style="font-size: medium;">Interested in writing a response to one of these articles? Check out our <a href="http://law.vanderbilt.edu/publications/vanderbilt-law-review/online-companion/about/index.aspx"><span style="color: #006699;">website</span></a> to find out how.</span></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/vanderbilt-law-review-volume-62-number-4-may-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
