Archive for the ‘Law Rev Contents’ Category

Illinois Law Review, Issue 2012:1 (January 2012)

posted by University of Illinois Law Review

University of Illinois Law Review, Issue 2012:1

Please see our website for past issues

Articles

A Positive Political Theory of Rules and Standards – Frank Cross, Tonja Jacobi & Emerson Tiller  (PDF)

The People Paradox – Nicole Stelle Garnett  (PDF)

Contract’s Constitutive Core: Solving Problems by Making Deals – James A. Henderson, Jr.  (PDF)

Fairness Versus Welfare in Health Insurance Content Regulation – Amy B. Monahan  (PDF)

David C. Baum Memorial Lecture

The Power of Persuasion Before and Within the Supreme Court: Reflections on NEPA’s Zero for Seventeen Record at the High Court – Richard J. Lazarus  (PDF)

Notes

Drawing a Line: The Need to Rethink Remedies Under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act – Justin A. Walters  (PDF)

Abandoning Property Taxes Assessed on Fallow Nonprofit Property – Brittany L. Viola  (PDF)

  January 27, 2012 at 7:00 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Illinois), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

Harvard Law Review, 125:3 (2012)

posted by Harvard Law Review

Volume 125 · January 2012 · Number 3

ARTICLE
Worth a Thousand Words: The Images of Copyright
Rebecca Tushnet

BOOK REVIEW
Capital Punishment and Contingency
Carol S. Steiker

NOTE
Spare the Mod: In Support of Total-Conversion Modified Video Games

RECENT CASES
Second Circuit Holds that Qualified Immunity Shields School Officials Who Discipline Students for Their Online Speech. — Doninger v. Niehoff, 642 F.3d 334 (2d Cir. 2011), cert. denied, No. 11-113, 2011 WL 3204853 (U.S. Oct. 31, 2011).

District of Oregon Invalidates Biological Opinion for Federally Operated Dams on Columbia River. — National Wildlife Federation v. National Marine Fisheries Service, No. CV 01- 00640-RE, 2011 WL 3322793 (D. Or. Aug. 2, 2011).

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court Unanimously Voids Foreclosure Sales Because Securitization Trusts Could Not Demonstrate Clear Chains of Title to Mortgages. — U.S. Bank National Ass’n v. Ibanez, 941 N.E.2d 40 (Mass. 2011).

Fifth Circuit Holds that Undocumented Immigrants Do Not Have Second Amendment Rights. — United States v. Portillo- Munoz, 643 F.3d 437 (5th Cir. 2011).

Fourth Circuit Upholds Federal Firearms Regulation. — United States v. Masciandaro, 638 F.3d 458 (4th Cir. 2011), cert. denied, No. 10-11212, 2011 WL 2516854 (U.S. Nov. 28, 2011).

Federal Circuit Holds that Mental Processes that Do Not, as a Practical Matter, Require a Computer to Be Performed Are Unpatentable. — CyberSource Corp. v. Retail Decisions, Inc., 654 F.3d 1366 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

RECENT LEGISLATION
Food Safety Modernization Act Implements Private Regulatory Scheme. — FDA Food Safety Modernization Act, Pub. L. No. 111-353, 124 Stat. 3885 (2011) (codified in scattered sections of the U.S. Code).

Congress Delegates Power to Raise the Debt Ceiling. — Budget Control Act of 2011, Pub. L. No. 112-25, 125 Stat. 240 (to be codified in scattered sections of the U.S. Code).

RECENT PUBLICATIONS
Recent Publications

  January 23, 2012 at 1:57 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   Comments Closed

The Harvard Law Review Online Forum: Responding to Jamal Greene, The Anticanon, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 379 (2011)

posted by Harvard Law Review

 

Hollow Hopes and Exaggerated Fears: The Canon/Anticanon in Context

Mark A. Graber :: The conventional constitutional canon and constitutional anticanon promote courts as powerful institutions. But neither the canonical nor the anticanonical constitutional decisions by the Supreme Court have produced the wonderful results or horrible evils sometimes attributed to them. In many cases, elected officials made cotemporaneous constitutional decisions that had as much influence as the celebrated or condemned judicial rulings. More often than not, judicial rulings matter by changing the political dynamics than by directly changing public policy. READ MORE
  

  January 11, 2012 at 11:03 am   Posted in: Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev Contents, Law Rev Forum   Print This Post   Comments Closed

University of Toronto Law Journal – Volume 61, Number 4, 2011

posted by University of Toronto Law Journal

University of Toronto Law Journal – Volume 61, Number 4, 2011

Special Issue: Constitutionalism and the Criminal Law

Editors’ Note
Shai Lavi, Hamish Stewart

Mind The Gap: Canada’s Different Criminal And Constitutional Standards Of Fault
Kent Roach

The Abiding Presence Of Conscience: Criminal Justice Against The Law And The Modern Constitutional Imagination
Benjamin L Berger

The Habibi Libel Trial: Defamation And The Hidden-Community Basis Of Criminal Law
Leora Bilsky

Covenants For The Sword
Alice Ristroph

Constitutional Rights In The Balance: Modern Exclusionary Rules And The Toleration Of Police Lawlessness In The Search For Truth
Stephen C Thaman

Policing Morality: Constitutional Law And The Criminalization Of Incest
Markus D Dubber

Basic Rights And Substantive Criminal Law: The Incest Case
Otto Lagodny

Citizenship Revocation As Punishment: On The Modern Duties Of Citizens And Their Criminal Breach
Shai Lavi

Constitutionalism And The Criminal Law: Rethinking Criminal Trial Bifurcation
Talia Fisher

Necessity Knows No Law: On Extreme Cases And Uncodifiable Necessities
Alon Harel, Assaf Sharon

Constitutionalizing Self-Defence
Alan Brudner

The Constitution And The Right Of Self-Defence
Hamish Stewart

Full text of University of Toronto Law Journal issues is available online at UTLJ Online,  Project Muse, JSTOR, HeinOnline, Westlaw, Westlaw-CARSWELL, LexisNexis and Quicklaw

 

  January 10, 2012 at 7:21 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Toronto), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

Florida Law Review, 64:1 (January 2012)

posted by Florida Law Review

 

Climate Change Special Issue

 

INTRODUCTION

Lisa Heinzerling, Climate Change at EPA, 64 Fla. L. Rev. 1 (2012)| PDF

ARTICLES

David Markell & J.B. Ruhl, An Empirical Assessment of Climate Change in the Courts: A New Jurisprudence or Business as Usual?, 64 Fla. L. Rev. 15 (2012)| PDF

Sarah Krakoff, Planetarian Identity Formation and the Relocalization of Environmental Law, 64 Fla. L. Rev. 87 (2012)| PDF

Dave Owen, Critical Habitat and the Challenge of Regulating Small Harms, 64 Fla. L. Rev. 141 (2012)| PDF

Robert W. Adler, Balancing Compassion and Risk in Climate Adaptation: U.S. Water, Drought, and Agricultural Law, 64 Fla. L. Rev. 201 (2012)| PDF

ESSAY

Victor B. Flatt, Adapting Laws for a Changing World: A Systemic Approach to Climate Change Adaptation, 64 Fla. L. Rev. 269 (2012)| PDF

CASE COMMENT

Allison Fischman, Preserving Legal Avenues for Climate Justice in Florida Post-American Electric Power, 64 Fla. L. Rev. 295 (2012)| PDF

 *     *     *

Have an opinion about any of these works? Consider submitting a short response for publication in the Florida Law Review Forum, an online companion to our printed volume.

  January 10, 2012 at 10:21 am   Posted in: Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

posted by Harvard Law Review

 

Responding to Jamal Greene, The Anticanon, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 379 (2011).

Is Dred Scott Really the Worst Opinion of All Time? Why Prigg Is Worse Than Dred Scott (But Is Likely to Stay Out of the “Anticanon”)

Sanford Levinson :: In The Anticanon, Professor Jamal Greene examines how a particular set of cases came to constitute the “anticanon” of constitutional law, that is, cases whose names can be spoken only to be condemned.  In this response, Professor Sanford Levinson questions whether the vitriol visited upon anticanonical cases, whether by lawyers or the laity, is necessarily defensible.  Levinson suggests that anticanonical cases may be indistinguishable from cases accorded far greater respect (and, indeed, treated as “canonical” exemplars of legal craft).  Some anticanonical cases may have genuine merit and lessons worth drawing on.  More particularly, Levinson asks why Prigg v. Pennsylvania, written by Justice Joseph Story, suffered neither the public obloquy nor the condemnation by professional legal academics directed at Chief Justice Taney for his opinion in Dred Scott, even though Greene notes that Prigg may be the worst Supreme Court decision of all time and Dred Scott, according to Levinson, contains potentially inspirational passages.  We want to believe that the canon and anticanon are separated by an impermeable wall.  But what if they are not? READ MORE

 

Responding to Orin S. Kerr, An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment, 125 Harv. L. Rev. 476 (2011).

An Original Take on Originalism

Christopher Slobogin :: In An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment, Professor Orin Kerr argues that Fourth Amendment law ought to be structured to ensure that the balance of power between government and citizenry remains constant.  In this response, Professor Christopher Slobogin acknowledges that this equilibrium-adjustment theory is elegant and, because it rests on a relatively “neutral” historical foundation, might be attractive to judges and scholars from different perspectives.  However, contrary to Kerr’s assertion, Slobogin argues that equilibrium adjustment does not easily explain many of the Court’s cases, nor does it help address the most difficult Fourth Amendment issues facing the Court today.  The historical foundations on which it rests are often shaky or insufficiently cognizant of modern preferences.  At bottom, equilibrium-adjustment theory is originalism, and thus suffers from all of the problems associated with that methodology. READ MORE

  January 4, 2012 at 3:55 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   Comments Closed

Washington Law Review, Issue 86:4 (December 2011)

posted by Washington Law Review

Volume 86  |  December 2011  |  Issue 4

Tribute:

IN MEMORIAM: PROFESSOR PAUL STEVEN MILLER

Kellye Y. Testy, Clark B. Lombardi, Chai R. Feldblum, Joseph M. Sellers, Michael E. Waterstone & Michael Ashley Stein

 

Articles:

BLINDSIGHT: HOW WE SEE DISABILITIES IN TORT LITIGATION

Anne Bloom with Paul Steven Miller

 

FORECLOSING MODIFICATIONS: HOW SERVICER INCENTIVES DISCOURAGE LOAN MODIFICATIONS

Diane E. Thompson

 

Comments:

FALSE VALOR: AMENDING THE STOLEN VALOR ACT TO CONFORM WITH THE FIRST AMENDMENT’S FRAUDULENT SPEECH EXCEPTION

Jeffery C. Barnum

 

A “NARROW EXCEPTION” RUN AMOK: HOW COURTS HAVE MISCONSTRUED EMPLOYEE-RIGHTS LAWS’ EXCLUSION OF “POLICYMAKING” APPOINTEES, AND A PROPOSED FRAMEWORK FOR GETTING BACK ON TRACK

Angela Galloway

 

AEDPA’S RATCHET: INVOKING THE MIRANDA RIGHT TO COUNSEL AFTER THE ANTITERRORISM AND EFFECTIVE DEATH PENALTY ACT

David Rubenstein

 

BANISHING HABEAS JURISDICTION: WHY FEDERAL COURTS LACK JURISDICTION TO HEAR TRIBAL BANISHMENT ACTIONS

Mary Swift

 

Table of Contents

 

  December 21, 2011 at 3:08 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Washington), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

Harvard Law Review, 125:2 (2011)

posted by Harvard Law Review

Volume 125 · December 2011 · Number 2

ARTICLES
The Anticanon
Jamal Greene

An Equilibrium-Adjustment Theory of the Fourth Amendment
Orin S. Kerr

BOOK REVIEW
The Founding Revisited
Michael J. Klarman

NOTES
Deweyan Democracy and the Administrative State

(In)efficient Breach of International Trade Law: The State of the “Free Pass” After China’s Rare Earths Export Embargo

RECENT CASES
D.C. Circuit Vacates District Court’s Preliminary Injunction of Federal Funding for Research Using Human Embryonic Stem Cells. — Sherley v. Sebelius, 644 F.3d 388 (D.C. Cir. 2011).

Ninth Circuit Holds that Exercise of Personal Jurisdiction over Company Whose Website Cultivates Significant Forum State User Base Comports with Due Process. — Mavrix Photo, Inc. v. Brand Technologies, Inc., 647 F.3d 1218 (9th Cir. 2011).

D.C. Court of Appeals Allows Recovery for Emotional Harm Outside Zone of Danger. — Hedgepeth v. Whitman Walker Clinic, 22 A.3d 789 (D.C. 2011) (en banc).

Seventh Circuit Invalidates Wisconsin Inmate Sex Change Prevention Act. — Fields v. Smith, 653 F.3d 550 (7th Cir. 2011).

Federal Circuit Invalidates Diagnostic Method Claims as Drawn to “Abstract Mental Processes.” — Association for Molecular Pathology v. U.S. Patent & Trademark Office, 653 F.3d 1329 (Fed. Cir. 2011).

Seventh Circuit Holds Ban on Firing Ranges Unconstitutional. — Ezell v. City of Chicago, 651 F.3d 684 (7th Cir. 2011).

D.C. Circuit Holds Corporations Not Immune from ATS Claims. — Doe VIII v. Exxon Mobil Corp., Nos. 09-7125, 09-7127, 09-7134, 09-7135, 2011 WL 2652384 (D.C. Cir. July 8, 2011).

RECENT PUBLICATIONS
Recent Publications

  December 20, 2011 at 1:47 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   Comments Closed

Hastings Law Journal, Issue 63.1 (Dec. 2011)

posted by Hastings Law Journal

Hastings Law Journal, Issue 63.1 (December 2011)

Articles
Institutionalization, Investment Adviser Regulation, and the Hedge Fund Problem
Anita K. Krug

Patent-Eligible Inventions After Bilski: History and Theory
Joshua D. Sarnoff

The Psychology of Procedural Justice in the Federal Courts
Rebecca Hollander-Blumoff

Crime Mapping and the Fourth Amendment: Redrawing “High-Crime Areas”
Andrew Guthrie Ferguson

Is There a Constitutional Right to Select the Genes of One’s Offspring?
Andrew B. Coan

Fashioning a New Look in Intellectual Property: Sui Generis Protection for the Innovative Designer
Linna T. Loangkote

The Hastings Law Journal’s online companion, Voir Dire, is now accepting submissions.

Recent Essays:
Excluding Unemployed Workers from Job Opportunities: Why Disparate Impact Protections Still Matter
Helen Norton

The Supreme Court’s Open-Ended Protection Against Third-Party Retaliation
Jessica Fink

  December 6, 2011 at 4:20 am   Posted in: Law Rev (Hastings), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:5 (November 2011)

posted by Boston College Law Review

Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:5 (November 2011)

Articles

Thomas P. Crocker, Presidential Power and Constitutional Responsibility, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1551 (2011) [PDF]

Babette E.L. Boliek, FCC Regulation Versus Antitrust: How Net Neutrality is Defining the Boundaries, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 685 (2011) 1627 [PDF]

Bryan Clark & Amanda C. Leiter, Regulatory Hide and Seek: What Agencies Can (and Can’t) Do to Limit Judicial Review, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1687 (2011) [PDF]

Brendan S. Maher, The Benefits of Opt-in Federalism, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1733 (2011) [PDF]

Notes

Vincent Chiappini, How American Are American Depository Receipts? ADRs, Rule 10b-5 Suits, and Morrison v. National Australia Bank, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1795 (2011) [PDF]

Randall L. Newsom, Cease and Desist: Finding an Equitable Solution in Trademark Disputes Between High Schools and Colleges, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1833 (2011) [PDF]

Kevin C. Quigley, Uncorking Granholm: Extending the Nondiscrimination Principle to All Interstate Commerce in Wine, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1871 (2011) [PDF]

Eli R. Shindelman, Time for the Court to Become “Intimate” with Surveillance Technology, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1909 (2011) [PDF]

Contents of current and past issues are available at our website.

  November 30, 2011 at 3:47 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Boston College), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

Harvard Law Review, 125:1 (2011)

posted by Harvard Law Review

Volume 125 · November 2011 · Number 1

 

The Supreme Court 2010 Term

 
FOREWORD
Neutral Principles, Motivated Cognition, and Some Problems for Constitutional Law
Dan M. Kahan
 
COMMENT
Fairness in Numbers: A Comment on AT&T v. Concepcion, Wal-Mart v. Dukes, and Turner v. Rogers
Judith Resnik
 
LEADING CASES

FIRST AMENDMENT
Establishment Clause — Taxpayer Standing: Arizona Christian School Tuition Organization v.Winn

Freedom of Speech — Categorical Exclusions: Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n

Freedom of Speech — Mixed Public-Private Speech: Snyder v. Phelps

Freedom of Speech — Campaign Finance Regulation: Arizona Free Enterprise Club’s Freedom Club PAC v. Bennett

FOURTH AMENDMENT
Exigent Circumstances Exception: Kentucky v. King

Material Witness Statute: Ashcroft v. al-Kidd

Right to Informational Privacy: NASA v. Nelson

FIFTH AMENDMENT
Self-Incrimination Clause: J.D.B. v. North Carolina

SIXTH AMENDMENT
Confrontation Clause: Bullcoming v. New Mexico

EIGHTH AMENDMENT
Prison Population Reduction Order: Brown v. Plata

SEPARATION OF POWERS
Displacement of Federal Common Law: American Electric Power Co. v. Connecticut

FEDERAL PREEMPTION OF STATE LAW
Agency Deference: Williamson v. Mazda Motor of America, Inc.

Immigration Law: Chamber of Commerce v. Whiting

Tort Law: Bruesewitz v. Wyeth LLC

PERSONAL JURISDICTION
Stream-of-Commerce Doctrine: J. McIntyre Machinery, Ltd. v. Nicastro

42 U.S.C. § 1983
Postconviction Access to DNA Evidence: Skinner v. Switzer

Scope of Municipal Liability: Connick v. Thompson

FREEDOM OF INFORMATION ACT
Personnel Exemption: Milner v. Department of the Navy

PATENT ACT OF 1952
Standard of Proof: Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. Partnership
 
STATISTICS
The Statistics

RECENT PUBLICATIONS
Recent Publications

  November 15, 2011 at 3:26 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Harvard), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   Comments Closed

Florida Law Review, 63:6 (December 2011)

posted by Florida Law Review

 

Volume 63, Issue 6 (December 2011):

 

DUNWODY DISTINGUISHED LECTURE IN LAW

Richard A. Epstein, The Constitutional Paradox of the Durbin Amendment: How Monopolies Are Offered Constitutional Protections Denied to Competitive Firms, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1307 (2011)| PDF

ARTICLES

Jeffrey Manns, Building Better Bailouts: The Case for a Long-Term Investment Approach, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1349 (2011)| PDF

Scott A. Moss, The Overhyped Path from Tinker to Morse: How the Student Speech Cases Show the Limits of Supreme Court Decisions – for the Law and for the Litigants, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1407 (2011)| PDF

NOTES

Courtney Gaughan, Some More Watters, Please: The Dodd-Frank Act’s New Preemption Standards Lighten Consumers’ Wallets, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1459 (2011)| PDF

Jordan E. Pratt, An Open and Shut Case: Why (and How) the Eleventh Circuit Should Restrain the Government’s Forum Closure Power, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1487 (2011)| PDF

Kathryn A. Kimball, Losing Our Soul: Judicial Discretion in Sentencing Child Pornography Offenders, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1515 (2011)| PDF

CASE COMMENT

Caycee Hampton, Confirmation of a Catch-22: Glik v. Cunniffe and the Paradox of Citizen Recording, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1549 (2011)| PDF

 *     *     *

Have an opinion about any of these works? Consider submitting a short response for publication in the Florida Law Review Forum, an online companion to our printed volume.

  November 3, 2011 at 1:59 pm   Posted in: Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

Illinois Law Review, Issue 2011:5 (October 2011)

posted by University of Illinois Law Review

University of Illinois Law Review, Issue 2011:5

Please see our website for past issues

Symposium: Law and Economics Conference to Honor Thomas S. Ulen

Introduction – John Colombo  (PDF)

Law and Economics in Japan – J. Mark Ramseyer  (PDF)

Maturing into Normal Science: The Effect of Empirical Legal Studies on Law and Economics – Robert Cooter  (PDF)

Formats for Law and Economics in Legal Scholarship: Views and Wishes from Europe – Carole M. Billiet  (PDF)

The Law and Economics of Legal Parochialism – Nuno Garoupa  (PDF)

Two Culture Problems in Law and Economics – Alan Schwartz  (PDF)

The Future of Law and Finance After the Financial Crisis: New Perspectives on Regulation and Corporate Governance for Banks – Dirk Heremans & Katrien Bosquet  (PDF)

The Legal Academy As Dinner Party: A (Short) Manifesto on the Necessity of Inter-Interdisciplinary Legal Scholarship – Paul J. Stancil  (PDF)

The Cross-Atlantic Law and Economics Divide: A Dissent – Ben Depoorter & Jef Demot  (PDF)

Present Bias and Criminal Law – Richard H. McAdams  (PDF)

Bail-Ins: Cyclical Effects of a Common Response to Financial Crises – Amitai Aviram  (PDF)

What Comes After Victory for Behavioral Law and Economics? – Russell Korobkin  (PDF)

The Psychological Foundations of Behavioral Law and Economics – Jeffrey J. Rachlinski  (PDF)

The Optimism Bias of the Behavioral Analysis of Crime Control – Doron Teichman  (PDF)

The Origins, Nature, and Promise of Empirical Legal Studies and a Response to Concerns – Theodore Eisenberg  (PDF)

An Empirical Analysis of Empirical Legal Scholarship Production, 1990–2009 – Michael Heise  (PDF)

Measuring Maximizing Judges: Empirical Legal Studies, Public Choice Theory, and Judicial Behavior – Joanna Shepherd  (PDF)

Very Like a Law Professor: An Essay in Honor of Tom Ulen – Ian Ayres  (PDF)

Empiricism and the Rising Incidence of Coauthorship in Law – Tom Ginsburg & Thomas J. Miles  (PDF)

Notes

Who’s Behind Door Number One?: Problems with Using Confidential Sources in Securities Litigation – David Artman  (PDF)

Whose Right Is It Anyway?:The Evisceration of an Infringer’s Seventh Amendment Right in Patent Litigation – Devon Curtis Beane  (PDF)

Keep it Quiet: How Facially Neutral Affirmative Action Passes Constitutional Scrutiny – Alan Wendler Hersh  (PDF)

  October 28, 2011 at 6:00 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Illinois), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

University of Toronto Law Journal – Volume 61, Number 3 /2011

posted by University of Toronto Law Journal

University of Toronto Law Journal – Volume 61, Number 3 / 2011

A Contextual Approach To The Admissibility Of The State’s Forensic Science And Medical Evidence
Gary Edmond, Kent Roach

Equality Under And Before The Law
William Lucy

Property And Collective Undertaking: The Principle Of Numerus Clausus
Avihay Dorfman

Book Reviews
William Kaplan: Canadian maverick: The life and times of Ivan C Rand
David Dyzenhaus

Michael Grossberg & Christopher Tomlins, Eds: The Cambridge history of law in America; vol 1, Early America (1580–1815); vol 2, The long nineteenth century (1789–1920)
Philip Girard

William E Conklin: Hegel’s laws: The legitimacy of a modern legal order
Whitten Sullivan Watson

Mary Sarah Bilder, Maeva Marcus, & R Kent Newmyer, Eds: Blackstone in America: Selected essays of Kathryn Preyer
Angela Fernandez

Andrew Petter: The politics of the Charter: The illusive promise of constitutional rights
Hamish Stewart

 

Full text of University of Toronto Law Journal issues is available online at UTLJ Online,  Project Muse, JSTOR, HeinOnline, Westlaw, Westlaw-CARSWELL, LexisNexis and Quicklaw

  October 21, 2011 at 7:54 am   Posted in: Law Rev (Toronto), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:4 (September 2011)

posted by Boston College Law Review

Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:4 (September 2011)

Articles

Gregory C. Shaffer & Mark A. Pollack, Hard Versus Soft Law in International Security, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1147 (2011) [PDF]

Roger A. Fairfax, Jr., Prosecutorial Nullification, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 685 (2011) 7243 [PDF]

Michael Grynberg, The Judicial Role in Trademark Law, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1283 (2011) [PDF]

Laura A. Heymann, The Law of Reputation and the Interest of the Audience, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1341 (2011) [PDF]

Notes

Emily C. Gainor, Initial Disclosures and Discovery Reform in the Wake of Plausible Pleading Standards, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1441 (2011) [PDF]

Katherine A. McAllister, A Distinction Without a Difference? ERISA Preemption and the Untenable Differential Treatment of Revocation-on-Divorce and Slayer Statutes, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1481 (2011) [PDF]

Sebastian Waisman, Pullman Abstention in Preemption Cases, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1515 (2011) [PDF]

Contents of current and past issues are available at our website.

  September 30, 2011 at 8:54 am   Posted in: Law Rev (Boston College), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

Hastings Law Journal, Issue 62.6 (July, 2011)

posted by Hastings Law Journal

 

Hastings Law Journal, Issue 62.6 (July, 2011)

Articles
Network Accountability for the Domestic Intelligence Apparatus
Danielle Keats Citron and Frank Pasquale

Severability of Statutes
Tom Campbell

Race Audits
R.A. Lenhardt

Jury 2.0
Caren Myers Morrison

The New Common Law: Courts, Culture, and the Localization of the Model Penal Code
Anders Walker

Forced Federalism: States as Laboratories of Immigration Reform
Keith Cunningham-Parmeter

Apportioning Liability Behind a Veil of Uncertainty
J. Shahar Dillbary

Someone is Watching: The Need for Enhanced Data Protection
Nic Roethlisberger

Bridging the Gap: An Application of Social Frameworks  Evidence to Shaken Baby Syndrome
Lauren Quint

  August 31, 2011 at 9:55 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Hastings), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   One Comment

Florida Law Review, 63:5 (September 2011)

posted by Florida Law Review

 

Volume 63, Issue 5 (September 2011):

 

Articles

Steven L. Schwarcz, Compensating Market Value Losses: Rethinking the Theory of Damages in a Market Economy, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1053 (2011)| PDF

Hari M. Osofsky, Multidimensional Governance and the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill , 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1077 (2011)| PDF

Stewart E. Sterk & Kimberly J. Brunelle, Zoning Finality: Reconceptualizing Res Judicata Doctrine in Land Use Cases, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1139 (2011)| PDF

Jonathan Witmer-Rich, Interrogation and the Roberts Court, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1189 (2011)| PDF

Benjamin J. Steinberg & Dwayne Antonio Robinson, Making BP’s Blood Curd-le: Duty, Economic Loss, and the Potential Cardozian Nightmare After Curd v. Mosaic Fertilizer, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1245 (2011)| PDF

 

Note

Jacob D. Moore, The Forgotten Victim in the Human Gene Patenting Debate: Pharmaceutical Companies, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1277 (2011)| PDF

  August 24, 2011 at 9:17 am   Posted in: Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

Illinois Law Review, Issue 2011:4 (August 2011)

posted by University of Illinois Law Review

University of Illinois Law Review, Issue 2011:4

Please see our website for past issues

Articles

Disintermediating Avarice: A Legal Framework for Commercially Sustainable Microfinance – Steven L. Schwarcz  (PDF)

Measure Twice, Shoot Once: Higher Care for CIA-Targeted Killing – Afsheen John Radsan & Richard Murphy  (PDF)

State Constitutional Failure – Daniel B. Rodriguez  (PDF)

Rescuing the Strong Precautionary Principle from Its Critics – Noah M. Sachs  (PDF)

David C. Baum Memorial Lecture

Transparency in Three Dimensions – Frederick Schauer  (PDF)

Notes

Applying Apprendi to Jury Sentencing: Why State Felony Jury Sentencing Threatens the Right to a Jury Trial – Melissa Carrington  (PDF)

Adjudicating in the Kingdom of Ends: A Constructivist Response to the Hart/Dworkin Debate – Matthew D. Friedlander  (PDF)

Getting Abused and Neglected Children into Court: A Child’s Right of Access Under the Petition Clause of the First Amendment – Ryan M. Rappa  (PDF)

  August 20, 2011 at 11:19 am   Posted in: Law Rev (Illinois), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   Comments Closed

The University of Chicago Law Review Volume 78, Issue 2

posted by University of Chicago Law Review

Articles

The Alien Tort Statute and the Law of Nations
Anthony J. Bellia Jr & Bradford R. Clark

Reconsidering Racial and Partisan Gerrymandering
Adam B. Cox & Richard T. Holden

Strategic Liability in the Corporate Group
Richard Squire

Comment

Understanding the Statutory Tax Practitioner Privilege: What Is Tax Shelter “Promotion”?
Jared T. Meier

Book Reviews

Federalism from the Bottom Up
Gordon S. Wood
The Ideological Origins of American Federalism, Alison L. LaCroix

Rhetoric and Reality in Early American Legal History: A Reply to Gordon Wood
Alison L. LaCroix

  August 4, 2011 at 10:50 pm   Posted in: Law Rev (Chicago), Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

Florida Law Review, 63:4 (July 2011)

posted by Florida Law Review

 

Volume 63, Issue 4 (July 2011):

 

Articles

Frances H. Foster, Should Pets Inherit?, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 801 (2011)| PDF

Shannon Weeks McCormack, Too Close to Home: Limiting the Organizations Subsidized by the Charitable Deduction to Those in Economic Need , 63 Fla. L. Rev. 857 (2011)| PDF

Kit Johnson, The Wonderful World of Disney Visas, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 915 (2011)| PDF

 

Notes

Kimon Korres, Bankrupting Bankruptcy: Circumventing Chapter 11 Protections Through Manipulation of the Business Justification Standard in § 363 Asset Sales, and a Refined Standard to Safeguard Against Abuse, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 959 (2011)| PDF

R. Benjamin Lingle, Post-Kelo Eminent Domain Reform: A Double-Edged Sword for Historic Preservation, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 985 (2011)| PDF

Heather Reynolds, Irreconcilable Regulations: Why the Sun Has Set on the Cuban Adjustment Act in Florida, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1013 (2011)| PDF

 

Case Comment

Lauren A. Kirkpatrick, Treading on Sacred Ground: Denying the Appointment of a Testator’s Nominated Personal Representative, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1041 (2011)| PDF

  July 5, 2011 at 8:08 am   Posted in: Law Rev Contents   Print This Post   No Comments

• « Older Entries