<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Law Rev (California)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/category/law-rev-california/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>California Law Review, Volume 98 Number 3 (June 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/10/california-law-review-volume-98-number-3-june-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/10/california-law-review-volume-98-number-3-june-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2010 21:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>California Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (California)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=35202</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
California Law Review, Volume 98 Number 3 (June 2010)
Symposium

<p>Martha C. Nussbaum, A Right to Marry?</p>


<p>Pamela S. Karlan, Let&#8217;s Call the Whole Thing Off: Can States Abolish the Institution of Marriage? </p>


<p>David Novak, Response to Martha Nussbaum&#8217;s &#8220;A Right to Marry?&#8221; </p>


<p>Michael Warner, Response to Martha Nussbaum </p>


<p>Martha C. Nussbaum, Reply
</p>


 

Articles

<p>David Gamage, Preventing State Budget Crises: Managing the Fiscal Volatility Problem </p>
<p>Daniel E. Ho and Kevin M. Quinn, How Not to Lie with Judicial Votes: Misconceptions, Measurement, and Models </p>
<p>Richard Lempert, The Inevitability of Theory </p>
<p>Dan Markel and Chad Flanders, Bentham on Stilts: The Bare Relevance of Subjectivity to Retributive Justice</p>

Comments
<p>Sonia R. Farber, Forgotten at Guantánamo: The Boumediene Decision and Its Implications for Refugees at the Base Under the Obama Administration</p>
Essays
<p>Ian F. Haney López, Post-Racial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.californialawreview.org/assets/images/clr_logo_concurring.png" alt="" /></p>
<h4><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/26">California Law Review, Volume 98 Number 3 (June 2010)</a></h4>
<h3>Symposium</h3>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><em>Martha C. Nussbaum</em>, <a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/a-right-to-marry">A Right to Marry<em>?</em></a></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><em>Pamela S. Karlan</em>, <a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/let-s-call-the-whole-thing-off-can-states-abolish-the-institution-of-marriage">Let&#8217;s Call the Whole Thing Off: Can States Abolish the Institution of Marriage?</a><em> </em></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><em>David Novak</em>, <a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/response-to-martha-nussbaum-s-a-right-to-marry">Response to Martha Nussbaum&#8217;s &#8220;A Right to Marry?&#8221;</a></span><span style="font-size: small"><em> </em></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><em>Michael Warner</em>, <a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/response-to-martha-nussbaum">Response to Martha Nussbaum</a></span><span style="font-size: small"><em> </em></span></p>
</div>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><em>Martha C. Nussbaum</em>, <a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/reply">Reply</a><br />
</span></p>
</div>
<div>
<h1><span style="font-size: small"> </span></h1>
</div>
<h3>Articles</h3>
<div>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><em>David Gamage</em>, <a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/preventing-state-budget-crises-managing-the-fiscal-volatility-problem">Preventing State Budget Crises: Managing the Fiscal Volatility Problem</a></span><span style="font-size: small"><em> </em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><em>Daniel E. Ho and Kevin M. Quinn</em>, <a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/how-not-to-lie-with-judicial-votes-misconceptions-measurement-and-models">How Not to Lie with Judicial Votes: Misconceptions, Measurement, and Models</a><em> </em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><em>Richard Lempert</em>, <a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/the-inevitability-of-theory">The Inevitability of Theory</a><em> </em></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><em>Dan Markel and Chad Flanders</em>, <a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/bentham-on-stilts-the-bare-relevance-of-subjectivity-to-retributive-justice">Bentham on Stilts: The Bare Relevance of Subjectivity to Retributive Justice</a></span></p>
</div>
<h3>Comments</h3>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><em>Sonia R. Farber</em>, <a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/forgotten-at-guantanamo-the-boumediene-decision-and-its-implications-for-refugees-at-the-base-under-the-obama-administration">Forgotten at Guantánamo: The Boumediene Decision and Its Implications for Refugees at the Base Under the Obama Administration</a></span></p>
<h3>Essays</h3>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><em>Ian F. Haney López</em>, <a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/post-racial-racism-racial-stratification-and-mass-incarceration-in-the-age-of-obama">Post-Racial Racism: Racial Stratification and Mass Incarceration in the Age of Obama</a></span></p>
<h3>Book Reviews</h3>
<p><span style="font-size: small"><em>Richard L. Hasen</em>, <a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/election-administration-reform-and-the-new-institutionalism">Election Administration Reform and the New Institutionalism</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/10/california-law-review-volume-98-number-3-june-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Law Review, Volume 97, Issue 1 (February 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/california_law_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/california_law_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>California Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (California)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/california-law-review-volume-97-issue-1-february-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
Articles
<p>An Estoppel Doctrine for Patented Standards</p>
<p>Robert P. Merges, Jeffrey M. Kuhn</p>
<p>Should Greenhouse Gas Permits Be Allocated on a Per Capita Basis?</p>
<p>Eric A. Posner, Cass R. Sunstein</p>
<p>The Federal Courts as a Franchise: Rethinking the Justifications for Federal Question Jurisdiction</p>
<p>Gil Seinfeld</p>
Comments
<p>No Way Out: An Analysis of Exit Processes for Gang Injunctions</p>
<p>Lindsay Crawford</p>
<p>Enterprise Liability: Reviewing and Revitalizing Liability for Corporate Groups</p>
<p>Meredith Dearborn</p>
Essays
<p>Against Moral Rights</p>
<p>Amy M. Adler</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org"><img alt="Cal-logo2.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Cal-logo2.jpg" width="310" height="110" /></a></p>
<h3>Articles</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/09Feb_Merges.pdf">An Estoppel Doctrine for Patented Standards</a></strong></p>
<p><i>Robert P. Merges, Jeffrey M. Kuhn</i></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/09Feb_Posner.pdf">Should Greenhouse Gas Permits Be Allocated on a Per Capita Basis?</a></strong></p>
<p><i>Eric A. Posner, Cass R. Sunstein</i></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/09Feb_Seinfeld.pdf">The Federal Courts as a Franchise: Rethinking the Justifications for Federal Question Jurisdiction</a></strong></p>
<p><i>Gil Seinfeld</i></p>
<h3>Comments</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/09Feb_Crawford.pdf">No Way Out: An Analysis of Exit Processes for Gang Injunctions</a></strong></p>
<p><i>Lindsay Crawford</i></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/09Feb_Dearborn.pdf">Enterprise Liability: Reviewing and Revitalizing Liability for Corporate Groups</a></strong></p>
<p><i>Meredith Dearborn</i></p>
<h3>Essays</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/09Feb_Adler.pdf">Against Moral Rights</a></strong></p>
<p><i>Amy M. Adler</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/california_law_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Law Review, Volume 96, Issue 6 (December 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/california_law_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/california_law_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>California Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (California)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/california-law-review-volume-96-issue-6-december-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Articles
<p>Keeping Imports Safe: A Proposal for Discriminatory Regulation of International Trade	</p>
<p>Kenneth A. Bamberger, Andrew T. Guzman</p>
<p>Virginity Testing and South Africa&#8217;s HIV/AIDS Crisis: Beyond Rights Universalism and Cultural Relativism Toward Health Capabilities 	</p>
<p> Erika R. George </p>
<p>Mourning Miranda</p>
<p> Charles D. Weisselberg </p>
Comments
<p>Learning from the Recent Interpretation of INA Section 245(a): Factors to Consider When Interpreting Immigration Law</p>
<p> Mayte Santacruz Benavidez  </p>
<p>An Analysis of Current Whistleblower Laws:Defending a More Flexible Approach to Reporting Requirements</p>
<p> Gerard Sinzdak  </p>
Essays
<p>Critical Inquiry: A Tool for Protecting the Dissident Professor&#8217;s Academic Freedom</p>
<p> Jennifer Elrod </p>
<p>The Myth of International Delegation</p>
<p> Andrew T. Guzman, Jennifer Landsidle </p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org"><img alt="Cal-logo2.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Cal-logo2.jpg" width="310" height="110" /></a></p>
<p><h3>Articles</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_Bamberger.pdf">Keeping Imports Safe: A Proposal for Discriminatory Regulation of International Trade</a></strong>	</p>
<p><i>Kenneth A. Bamberger, Andrew T. Guzman</i></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_George.pdf">Virginity Testing and South Africa&#8217;s HIV/AIDS Crisis: Beyond Rights Universalism and Cultural Relativism Toward Health Capabilities</a></strong> 	</p>
<p><i> Erika R. George </i></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_Weisselberg.pdf">Mourning Miranda</a></strong></p>
<p><i> Charles D. Weisselberg </i></p>
<h3>Comments</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_Santacruz.pdf">Learning from the Recent Interpretation of INA Section 245(a): Factors to Consider When Interpreting Immigration Law</a></strong></p>
<p><i> Mayte Santacruz Benavidez </i> </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_Sinzdak.pdf">An Analysis of Current Whistleblower Laws:Defending a More Flexible Approach to Reporting Requirements</a></strong></p>
<p><i> Gerard Sinzdak </i> </p>
<h3>Essays</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_Elrod.pdf">Critical Inquiry: A Tool for Protecting the Dissident Professor&#8217;s Academic Freedom</a></strong></p>
<p><i> Jennifer Elrod </i></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_Guzman.pdf">The Myth of International Delegation</a></strong></p>
<p><i> Andrew T. Guzman, Jennifer Landsidle </i></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/california_law_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Law Review, Volume 96:5 (October 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/california_law_review_volume_965_october_2008.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/california_law_review_volume_965_october_2008.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>California Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (California)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/california-law-review-volume-965-october-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>SYMPOSIUM: TAKING INITIATIVE ON INITIATIVES: EXAMINING PROPOSITION 209 AND BEYOND
Articles
<p>The New Racial Preferences	</p>
<p>Devon W. Carbado and Cheryl I. Harris</p>
<p>Race as a Diagnostic Tool: Latinas/os and Higher Education in California, Post-209 	</p>
<p>Jennifer M. Chacón</p>
<p>A Handicapped, Not “Sleeping,” Giant: The Devastating Impact of the Initiative Process on Latina/o and Immigrant Communities</p>
<p>Kevin R. Johnson</p>
<p>Cracking the Egg: Which Came First — Stigma or Affirmative Action?</p>
<p>Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Emily Houh,  Mary Campbell</p>
Comment
<p>Imprisoning Right: The Failure of Negotiated Governance in the Prison Inmate Grievance Process</p>
<p>Van Swearingen </p>
Remarks
<p>The First Justice Harlan</p>
<p>Goodwin Liu</p>
<p>Equal Rites and Equal Rights</p>
<p>Melissa Murray</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Cal-logo2.jpg"</p>
<p>src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Cal-logo2.jpg"</p>
<p>width="310" height="110" /></p>
<p><h3>SYMPOSIUM: TAKING INITIATIVE ON INITIATIVES: EXAMINING PROPOSITION 209 AND BEYOND</h3>
<h3>Articles</h3>
<p><strong>The New Racial Preferences</strong>	</p>
<p><i>Devon W. Carbado and Cheryl I. Harris</i></p>
<p><strong>Race as a Diagnostic Tool: Latinas/os and Higher Education in California, Post-209</strong> 	</p>
<p><i>Jennifer M. Chacón</i></p>
<p><strong>A Handicapped, Not “Sleeping,” Giant: The Devastating Impact of the Initiative Process on Latina/o and Immigrant Communities</strong></p>
<p><i>Kevin R. Johnson</i></p>
<p><strong>Cracking the Egg: Which Came First — Stigma or Affirmative Action?</strong></p>
<p><i>Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Emily Houh,  Mary Campbell</i></p>
<h3>Comment</h3>
<p><strong>Imprisoning Right: The Failure of Negotiated Governance in the Prison Inmate Grievance Process</strong></p>
<p><i>Van Swearingen</i> </p>
<h3>Remarks</h3>
<p><strong>The First Justice Harlan</strong></p>
<p><i>Goodwin Liu</i></p>
<p><strong>Equal Rites and Equal Rights</strong></p>
<p><i>Melissa Murray</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/california_law_review_volume_965_october_2008.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Success: California Law Review Drops Foolish Rules</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/success_califor.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/success_califor.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 06 Apr 2008 22:42:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Hoffman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (California)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School (Law Reviews)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/04/success-california-law-review-drops-foolish-rules.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>Several weeks ago, I blogged about rules promulgated by the California Law Review that appeared to discourage empirical submissions.  Michael Heise, at the ELS blog, then added to the chorus.</p>
<p>For fun, I checked the website of the CLR today, and found that the offending rules (#4, no images or graphics; and #5, only five charts/graphs/tables allowed) were gone.  Way to go, anonymous California Law Review student editors!</p>
<p>Next target: the Yale Law Journal&#8217;s incomprehensible policy on replication, which, as Katie Porter pointed out, seems to require authors to send YLJ a copy of STATA/SPSS with their submission.  Query: has anyone actually complied with this rule?  If so, did you pay for an extra program license?</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several weeks ago, I <a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/02/law_journals_po.html#comments">blogged </a>about rules promulgated by the California Law Review that appeared to discourage empirical submissions.  Michael Heise, at the ELS blog, then <a href="http://www.elsblog.org/the_empirical_legal_studi/2008/02/california-law.html">added </a>to the chorus.</p>
<p>For fun, I checked the website of the CLR today, and found that the offending rules (#4, no images or graphics; and #5, only five charts/graphs/tables allowed) <a href="http://clr.boalt.org/submissions.php">were gone</a>.  Way to go, anonymous California Law Review student editors!</p>
<p><strong>Next target:</strong> the Yale Law Journal&#8217;s incomprehensible policy on replication, which, as <a href="http://www.elsblog.org/the_empirical_legal_studi/2008/02/california-law.html#comment-105716514">Katie Porter</a> <a href="http://www.elsblog.org/the_empirical_legal_studi/2008/02/california-law.html#comment-105716514">pointed out,</a> seems to require authors to send YLJ a copy of STATA/SPSS with their submission.  Query: has anyone actually complied with this rule?  If so, did you pay for an extra program license?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/success_califor.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>8</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Law Review, Volume 95, Issue 5 (October 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/california_law.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/california_law.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>California Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (California)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/12/california-law-review-volume-95-issue-5-october-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Symposium: Race, Economic Justice, and Community Lawyering in the New Century</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>Introduction: Lawyers and Community Economic Development</p>
<p>William H. Simon</p>
<p>Faith in Community: Representing “Colored Town”	</p>
<p>Anthony V. Alfieri</p>
<p>Public Interest Lawyers and Resistance Movements</p>
<p>Sameer M. Ashar</p>
<p></p>
<p>Law in the Labor Movement’s Challenge to Wal-Mart: A Case Study of the Inglewood Site Fight</p>
<p>Scott L. Cummings</p>
<p>Integrative Lawyering: Navigating the Political Economy of Urban Development</p>
<p>Shelia R. Foster and Brian Glick</p>
<p>From “The Art of War” to “Being Peace”: Mindfulness and Community Lawyering in the Neoliberal Age</p>
<p>Angela Harris, Margaretta Lin, and Jeff Selbin</p>
<p></p>
<p>Concluding Essay: The Lawyer is not the Protagonist: Community Campaigns, Law, and Social Change</p>
<p>Jennifer Gordon</p>
<p>COMMENT</p>
<p>Putative Partners: Protecting Couples from the Consequences of Technically Invalid Domestic Partnerships</p>
<p>Ben Johnson</p>
<p>We are currently in the process of redesigning our website. PDF versions of the articles will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Cal-logo2.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Cal-logo2.jpg" width="310" height="110" /></p>
<p><strong>Symposium: Race, Economic Justice, and Community Lawyering in the New Century</p>
<p></strong><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><strong>Introduction: Lawyers and Community Economic Development</strong></p>
<p><em>William H. Simon</em></p>
<p><strong>Faith in Community: Representing “Colored Town”	</strong></p>
<p><em>Anthony V. Alfieri</em></p>
<p><strong>Public Interest Lawyers and Resistance Movements</strong></p>
<p><em>Sameer M. Ashar</em></p>
<p><strong></p>
<p>Law in the Labor Movement’s Challenge to Wal-Mart: A Case Study of the Inglewood Site Fight</strong></p>
<p><em>Scott L. Cummings</em></p>
<p><strong>Integrative Lawyering: Navigating the Political Economy of Urban Development</strong></p>
<p><em>Shelia R. Foster and Brian Glick</em></p>
<p><strong>From “The Art of War” to “Being Peace”: Mindfulness and Community Lawyering in the Neoliberal Age</strong></p>
<p><em>Angela Harris, Margaretta Lin, and Jeff Selbin</em></p>
<p><strong></p>
<p>Concluding Essay: The Lawyer is not the Protagonist: Community Campaigns, Law, and Social Change</strong></p>
<p><em>Jennifer Gordon</em></p>
<p><strong>COMMENT</strong></p>
<p><strong>Putative Partners: Protecting Couples from the Consequences of Technically Invalid Domestic Partnerships</strong></p>
<p><em>Ben Johnson</em></p>
<p>We are currently in the process of redesigning our website. PDF versions of the articles will be available in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/california_law.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

