Archive for the ‘Law Rev (California)’ Category
California Law Review, Volume 97, Issue 1 (February 2009)
posted by California Law Review
Articles
An Estoppel Doctrine for Patented Standards
Robert P. Merges, Jeffrey M. Kuhn
Should Greenhouse Gas Permits Be Allocated on a Per Capita Basis?
Eric A. Posner, Cass R. Sunstein
The Federal Courts as a Franchise: Rethinking the Justifications for Federal Question Jurisdiction
Gil Seinfeld
Comments
No Way Out: An Analysis of Exit Processes for Gang Injunctions
Lindsay Crawford
Enterprise Liability: Reviewing and Revitalizing Liability for Corporate Groups
Meredith Dearborn
Essays
Amy M. Adler
February 19, 2009 at 2:39 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (California)
Print This Post
3 Comments
California Law Review, Volume 96, Issue 6 (December 2008)
posted by California Law Review
Articles
Keeping Imports Safe: A Proposal for Discriminatory Regulation of International Trade
Kenneth A. Bamberger, Andrew T. Guzman
Erika R. George
Charles D. Weisselberg
Comments
Mayte Santacruz Benavidez
Gerard Sinzdak
Essays
Critical Inquiry: A Tool for Protecting the Dissident Professor’s Academic Freedom
Jennifer Elrod
The Myth of International Delegation
Andrew T. Guzman, Jennifer Landsidle
February 3, 2009 at 6:05 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (California)
Print This Post
No Comments
California Law Review, Volume 96:5 (October 2008)
posted by California Law Review
src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Cal-logo2.jpg"
width="310" height="110" />
SYMPOSIUM: TAKING INITIATIVE ON INITIATIVES: EXAMINING PROPOSITION 209 AND BEYOND
Articles
The New Racial Preferences
Devon W. Carbado and Cheryl I. Harris
Race as a Diagnostic Tool: Latinas/os and Higher Education in California, Post-209
Jennifer M. Chacón
A Handicapped, Not “Sleeping,” Giant: The Devastating Impact of the Initiative Process on Latina/o and Immigrant Communities
Kevin R. Johnson
Cracking the Egg: Which Came First — Stigma or Affirmative Action?
Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Emily Houh, Mary Campbell
Comment
Imprisoning Right: The Failure of Negotiated Governance in the Prison Inmate Grievance Process
Van Swearingen
Remarks
The First Justice Harlan
Goodwin Liu
Equal Rites and Equal Rights
Melissa Murray
October 13, 2008 at 4:59 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (California), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments
Success: California Law Review Drops Foolish Rules
posted by Dave Hoffman
Several weeks ago, I blogged about rules promulgated by the California Law Review that appeared to discourage empirical submissions. Michael Heise, at the ELS blog, then added to the chorus.
For fun, I checked the website of the CLR today, and found that the offending rules (#4, no images or graphics; and #5, only five charts/graphs/tables allowed) were gone. Way to go, anonymous California Law Review student editors!
Next target: the Yale Law Journal’s incomprehensible policy on replication, which, as Katie Porter pointed out, seems to require authors to send YLJ a copy of STATA/SPSS with their submission. Query: has anyone actually complied with this rule? If so, did you pay for an extra program license?
April 6, 2008 at 3:42 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (California), Law School (Law Reviews)
Print This Post
8 Comments
California Law Review, Volume 95, Issue 5 (October 2007)
posted by California Law Review

Symposium: Race, Economic Justice, and Community Lawyering in the New Century
ARTICLES
Introduction: Lawyers and Community Economic Development
William H. Simon
Faith in Community: Representing “Colored Town”
Anthony V. Alfieri
Public Interest Lawyers and Resistance Movements
Sameer M. Ashar
Law in the Labor Movement’s Challenge to Wal-Mart: A Case Study of the Inglewood Site Fight
Scott L. Cummings
Integrative Lawyering: Navigating the Political Economy of Urban Development
Shelia R. Foster and Brian Glick
From “The Art of War” to “Being Peace”: Mindfulness and Community Lawyering in the Neoliberal Age
Angela Harris, Margaretta Lin, and Jeff Selbin
Concluding Essay: The Lawyer is not the Protagonist: Community Campaigns, Law, and Social Change
Jennifer Gordon
COMMENT
Putative Partners: Protecting Couples from the Consequences of Technically Invalid Domestic Partnerships
Ben Johnson
We are currently in the process of redesigning our website. PDF versions of the articles will be available in the future.
December 17, 2007 at 5:42 pm
Posted in: Law Rev (California), Law Rev Contents
Print This Post
No Comments






