<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Law Rev (Boston University)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/category/law-rev-boston-university/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 11:31:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Boston University Law Review, Issue 91:1 (January 2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/02/boston-university-law-review-issue-911-january-2011.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/02/boston-university-law-review-issue-911-january-2011.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Feb 2011 02:23:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston University Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston University)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=40849</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
Volume 91 Number 1 &#8211; January 2011
ARTICLES
<p>Melville M. Bigelow: Boston University&#8217;s Neglected Pioneer of Historical Legal Scholarship in America 
David M. Rabban
Page 1</p>
<p>Beyond Individualism in Law and Economics 
Robert Ahdieh
Page 43</p>
<p>Litigating Together: Social, Moral, and Legal Obligations 
Elizabeth Chamblee Burch
Page 87</p>
<p>Congress&#8217;s Inability to Solve Standing Problems 
Heather Elliott
Page 159</p>
<p>Structural Obstacles to Settlement of Land Use Disputes 
Stewart E. Sterk
Page 227</p>
BOOK REVIEW
<p>Toward a Representational Theory of the Executive 
Victoria F. Nourse &#38; John P. Figura
Page 273</p>
NOTES
<p>Regulating Abortion Through Direct Democracy: The Liberty of All Versus the Moral Code of a Majority
Molly E. Carter
Page 305</p>
<p>Regulating Corruption: Analyzing Uncertainty in Current Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement 
Lauren Giudice
Page 347</p>
RESPONSES
<p>Response to Robert Adhieh&#8217;s Beyond Individualism in Law and Economics 
Richard R.W. Brooks
Page 379</p>
<p>The Whole is Greater than the Sum [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-40856" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bu_law_logo.jpg" alt="" width="142" height="131" /></p>
<h2><span style="font-size: large">Volume 91 Number 1 &#8211; January 2011</span></h2>
<h3><span style="font-size: small">ARTICLES</span></h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/RABBAN.pdf">Melville M. Bigelow: Boston University&#8217;s Neglected Pioneer of Historical Legal Scholarship in America </a><br />
David M. Rabban<br />
Page 1</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/AHDIEH.pdf">Beyond Individualism in Law and Economics </a><br />
Robert Ahdieh<br />
Page 43</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/BURCH.pdf">Litigating Together: Social, Moral, and Legal Obligations </a><br />
Elizabeth Chamblee Burch<br />
Page 87</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/ELLIOTT.pdf">Congress&#8217;s Inability to Solve Standing Problems </a><br />
Heather Elliott<br />
Page 159</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/STERK.pdf">Structural Obstacles to Settlement of Land Use Disputes </a><br />
Stewart E. Sterk<br />
Page 227</p>
<h3><span style="font-size: small">BOOK REVIEW</span></h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/NOURSEandFIGURA.pdf">Toward a Representational Theory of the Executive </a><br />
Victoria F. Nourse &amp; John P. Figura<br />
Page 273</p>
<h3><span style="font-size: small">NOTES</span></h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/CARTER.pdf">Regulating Abortion Through Direct Democracy: The Liberty of All Versus the Moral Code of a Majority</a><br />
Molly E. Carter<br />
Page 305</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/GIUDICE.pdf">Regulating Corruption: Analyzing Uncertainty in Current Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Enforcement </a><br />
Lauren Giudice<br />
Page 347</p>
<h3><span style="font-size: small">RESPONSES</span></h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/BROOKS.pdf">Response to Robert Adhieh&#8217;s <em>Beyond Individualism in Law and Economics </em></a><br />
Richard R.W. Brooks<br />
Page 379</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/DAU-SCHMIDT.pdf">The Whole is Greater than the Sum of the Parts: Analyzing Legal Problems in an Endogenous World <em> </em></a><br />
Kenneth G. Dau-Schmidt<br />
Page 385</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/ULEN.pdf">A Comment on Ahdieh, <em>Beyond Individualism in Law and Economics </em></a><br />
Thomas S. Ulen<br />
Page 393</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small">Boston University Law Review 2010-2011 • <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html">http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/02/boston-university-law-review-issue-911-january-2011.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston University Law Review, Issue 90:6 (December 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/12/boston-university-law-review-issue-906-december-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/12/boston-university-law-review-issue-906-december-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Dec 2010 03:48:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston University Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston University)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=41113</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
Volume 90 Number 6 &#8211; December 2010
ARTICLES
<p>Does Ricci Herald a New Disparate Impact? 
Joseph A. Seiner &#38; Benjamin N. Gutman
Page 2181</p>
<p>Is Punishment Relevant After All? A Prescription for Informing Juries of the Consequences of Conviction 
Jeffrey Bellin
Page 2223</p>
<p>The Trademark Fair Use Reform Act 
William McGeveran
Page 2267</p>
<p>The Supreme Court&#8217;s Assault on Litigation: Why (and How) it Might Be Good for Health Law 
Abigail R. Moncrieff
Page 2323</p>
ESSAY
<p>Shades of Gray: Applying the Benefit-the-Beneficiaries Rule to Trust Investment Directives 
Jeffrey A. Cooper
Page 2383</p>
NOTES
<p>Federal  Regulation of the &#8220;Smart Choices Program&#8221;: Subjecting Front-of-Package  Nutrition Labeling Schemes to Concurrent Regulation by the FDA and the  FTC 
Chelsea M. Childs
Page 2403</p>
<p>Caught in the Crossfire: The Right of Federal Land Residents to a State Education 
Daphne Putka
Page 2427</p>
<p>Freedom of Movement at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="/Users/RACHEL%7E1/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot-1.png" alt="" /><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-41117" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/bu_law_logo.jpg" alt="" width="142" height="131" /></p>
<h3>Volume 90 Number 6 &#8211; December 2010</h3>
<h4>ARTICLES</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/SEINERANDGUTMAN.pdf">Does Ricci Herald a New Disparate Impact? </a><br />
Joseph A. Seiner &amp; Benjamin N. Gutman<br />
Page 2181</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/BELLIN.pdf">Is Punishment Relevant After All? A Prescription for Informing Juries of the Consequences of Conviction </a><br />
Jeffrey Bellin<br />
Page 2223</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/MCGEVERAN.pdf">The Trademark Fair Use Reform Act </a><br />
William McGeveran<br />
Page 2267</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/MONCRIEFF.pdf">The Supreme Court&#8217;s Assault on Litigation: Why (and How) it Might Be Good for Health Law </a><br />
Abigail R. Moncrieff<br />
Page 2323</p>
<h4>ESSAY</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/COOPER.pdf">Shades of Gray: Applying the Benefit-the-Beneficiaries Rule to Trust Investment Directives </a><br />
Jeffrey A. Cooper<br />
Page 2383</p>
<h4>NOTES</h4>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/CHILDS_001.pdf">Federal  Regulation of the &#8220;Smart Choices Program&#8221;: Subjecting Front-of-Package  Nutrition Labeling Schemes to Concurrent Regulation by the FDA and the  FTC </a><br />
Chelsea M. Childs<br />
Page 2403</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/PUTKA.pdf">Caught in the Crossfire: The Right of Federal Land Residents to a State Education </a><br />
Daphne Putka<br />
Page 2427</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/WILHELM.pdf">Freedom of Movement at a Standstill? Toward the Establishment of a Fundamental Right to Intrastate Travel </a><br />
Kathryn E. Wilhelm<br />
Page 2461</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small">Boston University Law Review 2010-2011 • <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html">http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html</a><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/12/boston-university-law-review-issue-906-december-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston University Law Review, Issue 90:5 (October 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/10/boston-university-law-review-issue-90-october-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/10/boston-university-law-review-issue-90-october-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Oct 2010 06:23:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston University Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston University)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=41121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
Volume 90 Number 5 &#8211; October 2010
ARTICLES
<p>International Extradition, the Rule of Non-Inquiry, and the Problem of Sovereignty 
John T. Parry
Page 1973</p>
<p>Is &#8220;Pay-to-Play&#8221; Driving Public Pension Fund Activism In Securities Class Actions? An Empirical Study 
David H. Webber
Page 2031</p>
ESSAY
<p>Baseball&#8217;s Moral Hazard: Law, Economics, and the Designated Hitter Rule 
Dustin E. Buehler &#38; Steve P. Calandrillo
Page 2083</p>
NOTES
<p>Two Nations, One Web: Comparative Legal Approaches to Pornographic Obscenity by the United States and the United Kingdom 
William T. Goldberg
Page 2121</p>
<p>Elemental Copyright: The Complexity of Ideas and the Alchemy of Mind-Share 
Todd Marabella
Page 2149</p>
<p>Boston University Law Review 2010-2011 • http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-41125" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/02/bu_law_logo2.jpg" alt="" width="136" height="125" /></p>
<h2>Volume 90 Number 5 &#8211; October 2010</h2>
<h3><span style="font-size: small">ARTICLES</span></h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/PARRY.pdf">International Extradition, the Rule of Non-Inquiry, and the Problem of Sovereignty </a><br />
John T. Parry<br />
Page 1973</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/WEBBER.pdf">Is &#8220;Pay-to-Play&#8221; Driving Public Pension Fund Activism In Securities Class Actions? An Empirical Study </a><br />
David H. Webber<br />
Page 2031</p>
<h3><span style="font-size: small">ESSAY</span></h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/BUEHLERandCALANDRILLO.pdf">Baseball&#8217;s Moral Hazard: Law, Economics, and the Designated Hitter Rule </a><br />
Dustin E. Buehler &amp; Steve P. Calandrillo<br />
Page 2083</p>
<h3><span style="font-size: small">NOTES</span></h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/GOLDBERG_000.pdf">Two Nations, One Web: Comparative Legal Approaches to Pornographic Obscenity by the United States and the United Kingdom </a><br />
William T. Goldberg<br />
Page 2121</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/MARABELLA.pdf">Elemental Copyright: The Complexity of Ideas and the Alchemy of Mind-Share </a><br />
Todd Marabella<br />
Page 2149</p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small">Boston University Law Review 2010-2011 • <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html">http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html</a></span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/10/boston-university-law-review-issue-90-october-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston University Law Review, Issue 90:3 (June 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/07/boston-university-law-review-issue-903-june-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/07/boston-university-law-review-issue-903-june-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Jul 2010 22:26:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston University Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston University)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=31593</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston University Law Review, Issue 90:3 (June 2010)</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>Adverse  Inferences About Adverse Inferences: Restructuring Juridicial Roles for  Responding to Evidence Tampering by Parties to Litigation
 Dale A. Nance, Page 1089</p>
<p>Resurrecting  Autonomy: The Criminal Defendant&#8217;s Right to Control the Case
 Erica J. Hashimoto, Page 1147</p>
ESSAY
<p>Regulating  Reproductive Technologies: Timing, Uncertainty, and Donor Anonymity
 Gaia Bernstein, Page 1189</p>
NOTES
<p>Applying  Liability Rules to Metatag Cases and Other Instances of Trademark  Infringement on the Internet: How to Get to &#8220;No Harm, No Foul&#8221;
 Daniel Devoe, Page 1221</p>
<p>Men  Come and Go, but Roe Abides: Why Roe v. Wade Will Not  Be Overruled
 Anthony Dutra, Page 1261</p>
<p>Interpretive  Rules: Can the Amount of Deference Accorded Them Offer Insight into the  Procedural Inquiry?
 Thomas J. Fraser, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignnone" src="http://www.bu.edu/brand/common/images/logo/master_logo.gif" alt="Boston University Logo" width="189" height="85" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html">Boston University Law Review, Issue 90:3 (June 2010)</a></p>
<p><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/NANCE.pdf">Adverse  Inferences About Adverse Inferences: Restructuring Juridicial Roles for  Responding to Evidence Tampering by Parties to Litigation</a><br />
<em> Dale A. Nance</em>, Page 1089</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/HASHIMOTO.pdf">Resurrecting  Autonomy: The Criminal Defendant&#8217;s Right to Control the Case</a><br />
<em> Erica J. Hashimoto</em>, Page 1147</p>
<h3>ESSAY</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/BERNSTEIN.pdf">Regulating  Reproductive Technologies: Timing, Uncertainty, and Donor Anonymity</a><br />
<em> Gaia Bernstein</em>, Page 1189</p>
<h3>NOTES</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/DEVOE.pdf">Applying  Liability Rules to Metatag Cases and Other Instances of Trademark  Infringement on the Internet: How to Get to &#8220;No Harm, No Foul&#8221;</a><br />
<em> Daniel Devoe</em>, Page 1221</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/DUTRA.pdf">Men  Come and Go, but Roe Abides: Why Roe v. Wade Will Not  Be Overruled</a><br />
<em> Anthony Dutra</em>, Page 1261</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/FRASER.pdf">Interpretive  Rules: Can the Amount of Deference Accorded Them Offer Insight into the  Procedural Inquiry?</a><br />
<em> Thomas J. Fraser</em>, Page 1303</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/ROSA.pdf">Should  Owners Have to Share? An Examination of Forced Sharing in the Name of  Fairness in Recent Multiple Fraud Victim Cases</a><br />
<em> Claire Seaton Rosa</em>, Page 1331</p>
<div style="width: 1px;height: 1px;overflow: hidden">
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/NANCE.pdf">Adverse  Inferences About Adverse Inferences: Restructuring Juridicial Roles for  Responding to Evidence Tampering by Parties to Litigation</a><br />
Dale A. Nance<br />
Page 1089</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/HASHIMOTO.pdf">Resurrecting  Autonomy: The Criminal Defendant&#8217;s Right to Control the Case</a><br />
Erica J. Hashimoto<br />
Page 1147</p>
<h3>ESSAY</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/BERNSTEIN.pdf">Regulating  Reproductive Technologies: Timing, Uncertainty, and Donor Anonymity</a><br />
Gaia Bernstein<br />
Page 1189</p>
<h3>NOTES</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/DEVOE.pdf">Applying  Liability Rules to Metatag Cases and Other Instances of Trademark  Infringement on the Internet: How to Get to &#8220;No Harm, No Foul&#8221;</a><br />
Daniel Devoe<br />
Page 1221</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/DUTRA.pdf">Men  Come and Go, but <em>Roe</em> Abides: Why <em>Roe v. Wade</em> Will Not  Be Overruled</a><br />
Anthony Dutra<br />
Page 1261</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/FRASER.pdf">Interpretive  Rules: Can the Amount of Deference Accorded Them Offer Insight into the  Procedural Inquiry?</a><br />
Thomas J. Fraser<br />
Page 1303</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/ROSA.pdf">Should  Owners Have to Share? An Examination of Forced Sharing in the Name of  Fairness in Recent Multiple Fraud Victim Cases</a><br />
Claire Seaton Rosa<br />
Page 1331</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/NANCE.pdf">Adverse  Inferences About Adverse Inferences: Restructuring Juridicial Roles for  Responding to Evidence Tampering by Parties to Litigation</a><br />
Dale A. Nance<br />
Page 1089</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/HASHIMOTO.pdf">Resurrecting  Autonomy: The Criminal Defendant&#8217;s Right to Control the Case</a><br />
Erica J. Hashimoto<br />
Page 1147</p>
<h3>ESSAY</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/BERNSTEIN.pdf">Regulating  Reproductive Technologies: Timing, Uncertainty, and Donor Anonymity</a><br />
Gaia Bernstein<br />
Page 1189</p>
<h3>NOTES</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/DEVOE.pdf">Applying  Liability Rules to Metatag Cases and Other Instances of Trademark  Infringement on the Internet: How to Get to &#8220;No Harm, No Foul&#8221;</a><br />
Daniel Devoe<br />
Page 1221</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/DUTRA.pdf">Men  Come and Go, but <em>Roe</em> Abides: Why <em>Roe v. Wade</em> Will Not  Be Overruled</a><br />
Anthony Dutra<br />
Page 1261</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/FRASER.pdf">Interpretive  Rules: Can the Amount of Deference Accorded Them Offer Insight into the  Procedural Inquiry?</a><br />
Thomas J. Fraser<br />
Page 1303</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/ROSA.pdf">Should  Owners Have to Share? An Examination of Forced Sharing in the Name of  Fairness in Recent Multiple Fraud Victim Cases</a><br />
Claire Seaton Rosa<br />
Page 1331</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/07/boston-university-law-review-issue-903-june-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston University Law Review, Issue 90:2 (April 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/boston-university-law-review-902-april-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/boston-university-law-review-902-april-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 May 2010 15:45:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston University Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston University)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=29444</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston University Law Review, Issue 90:2 (April 2010)</p>
<p>SYMPOSIUM</p>
<p>Justice for Hedgehogs: A Conference on Ronald Dworkin&#8217;s Forthcoming Book</p>
<p>Editors&#8217; Foreword</p>
<p>KEYNOTE ADDRESS</p>
<p>Justice for Hedgehogs
Ronald Dworkin, Page 469</p>
<p>PANEL I: TRUTH AND METAETHICS</p>
<p>The Possibility of Metaethics
Russ Shafer-Landau, Page 479</p>
<p>Moral Skepticism for Foxes
Daniel Star, Page 497</p>
<p>Dworkin on External Skepticism
Michael Smith, Page 509</p>
<p>A Historian&#8217;s Comment on the Metaethics Panel at Justice for Hedgehogs: A Conference on Ronald Dworkin&#8217;s Forthcoming Book
Aaron Garrett, Page 521</p>
<p>PANEL II: INTERPRETATION</p>
<p>Two Takes on Truth in Normative Discourse
Benjamin C. Zipursky, Page 525</p>
<p>Is Moral Reasoning Conceptual Interpretation?
Richard H. Fallon, Jr., Page 535</p>
<p>The Unity of Interpretation
Lawrence B. Solum, Page 551</p>
<p>Material Rights, Underenforcement, and the Adjudication Thesis
Lawrence Sager, Page 579</p>
<p>Moral Limits of Dworkin&#8217;s Theory of Law and Legal Interpretation
David Lyons, Page 595</p>
<p>PANEL III: ETHICS AND FREE WILL</p>
<p>Varieties of Responsibility
T.M. Scanlon, Page 603</p>
<p>Responsibility [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bu.edu/brand/common/images/logo/master_logo.gif" alt="Boston University Logo" width="189" height="85" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html">Boston University Law Review, Issue 90:2 (April 2010)</a></p>
<p><strong>SYMPOSIUM</strong></p>
<p><em>Justice for Hedgehogs</em>: A Conference on Ronald Dworkin&#8217;s Forthcoming Book</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/EDITORSFOREWORD.pdf">Editors&#8217; Foreword</a></p>
<p><strong>KEYNOTE ADDRESS</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/DWORKIN_K.pdf">Justice for Hedgehogs</a><br />
<em>Ronald Dworkin</em>, Page 469</p>
<p><strong>PANEL I: TRUTH AND METAETHICS</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/SHAFER-LANDAU.pdf">The Possibility of Metaethics</a><br />
<em>Russ Shafer-Landau</em>, Page 479</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/STAR.pdf">Moral Skepticism for Foxes</a><br />
<em>Daniel Star</em>, Page 497</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/SMITH.pdf">Dworkin on External Skepticism</a><br />
<em>Michael Smith</em>, Page 509</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/GARRETT.pdf">A Historian&#8217;s Comment on the Metaethics Panel at Justice for Hedgehogs: A Conference on Ronald Dworkin&#8217;s Forthcoming Book</a><br />
<em>Aaron Garrett</em>, Page 521</p>
<p><strong>PANEL II: INTERPRETATION</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/ZIPURSKY.pdf">Two Takes on Truth in Normative Discourse</a><br />
<em>Benjamin C. Zipursky</em>, Page 525</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/FALLON.pdf">Is Moral Reasoning Conceptual Interpretation?</a><br />
<em>Richard H. Fallon, Jr.</em>, Page 535</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/SOLUM.pdf">The Unity of Interpretation</a><br />
<em>Lawrence B. Solum</em>, Page 551</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/SAGER.pdf">Material Rights, Underenforcement, and the Adjudication Thesis</a><br />
<em>Lawrence Sager</em>, Page 579</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/LYONS.pdf">Moral Limits of Dworkin&#8217;s Theory of Law and Legal Interpretation</a><br />
<em>David Lyons</em>, Page 595</p>
<p><strong>PANEL III: ETHICS AND FREE WILL</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/SCANLON.pdf">Varieties of Responsibility</a><br />
<em>T.M. Scanlon</em>, Page 603</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/KANE.pdf">Responsibility and Free Will in Dworkin&#8217;s Justice for Hedgehogs</a><br />
<em>Robert Kane</em>, Page 611</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/ALLEN.pdf">Mental Disorders and the &#8220;System of Judgmental Responsibility&#8221;</a><br />
<em>Anita L. Allen</em>, Page 621</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/JOLLS.pdf">Dworkin&#8217;s Living Well and the Well-Being Revolution</a><br />
<em>Christine Jolls</em>, Page 641</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/SEN.pdf">Dworkin on Ethics and Freewill: Comments and Questions</a><br />
<em>Amartya Sen</em>, Page 657</p>
<p><strong>PANEL IV: MORALITY: AID, HARM, AND OBLIGATION</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/APPIAH.pdf">Dignity and Global Duty</a><br />
<em>Kwame Anthony Appiah</em>, Page 661</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/GOLDBERG.pdf">Liberal Responsibility: A Comment on Justice for Hedgehogs</a><br />
<em>John C.P. Goldberg</em>, Page 677</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/KAMM.pdf">What Ethical Responsibility Cannot Justify: A Discussion of Ronald Dworkin&#8217;s Justice for Hedgehogs</a><br />
<em>F.M. Kamm</em>, Page 691</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/SIMONS.pdf">Dworkin&#8217;s Two Principles of Dignity: An Unsatisfactory Nonconsequentialist Account of Interpersonal Moral Duties</a><br />
<em>Kenneth W. Simons</em>, Page 715</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/SREEDHARANDDELMAS.pdf">State Legitimacy and Political Obligation in Justice for Hedgehogs: The Radical Potential of Dworkinian Dignity</a><br />
<em>Susanne Sreedhar &amp; Candice Delmas</em>, Page 737</p>
<p><strong>PANEL V: POLITICS AND JUSTICE I</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/BAKER_000.pdf">In Hedgehog Solidarity</a><br />
<em>C. Edwin Baker</em>, Page 759</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/WEST.pdf">Rights, Harms, and Duties: A Response to Justice for Hedgehogs</a><br />
<em> Robin West</em>, Page 819</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/FLEMING.pdf">Taking Responsibilities as Well as Rights Seriously</a><br />
<em> James E. Fleming</em>, Page 839</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/BAXTER.pdf">Dworkin&#8217;s &#8220;One-System&#8221; Conception of Law and Morality</a><br />
<em> Hugh Baxter</em>, Page 857</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/MCCLAIN.pdf">Justice and Elegance for Hedgehogs &#8211; In Life, Law, and Literature</a><br />
<em> Linda C. McClain</em>, Page 863</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/MINOWANDSINGER.pdf">In Favor of Foxes: Pluralism as Fact and Aid to the Pursuit of Justice</a><br />
<em> Martha Minow &amp; Joseph William Singer</em>, Page 903</p>
<p><strong>PANEL VI: POLITICS AND JUSTICE II</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/FREEMAN.pdf">Equality of Resources, Market Luck, and the Justification of Adjusted Market Distributions</a><br />
<em>Samuel Freeman</em>, Page 921</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/MICHELMAN.pdf">Foxy Freedom?</a><br />
<em> Frank I. Michelman</em>, Page 949</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/SLOANE_000.pdf">Human Rights for Hedgehogs?: Global Value Pluralism, International Law, and Some Reservations of the Fox</a><br />
<em> Robert D. Sloane</em>, Page 975</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/BONE.pdf">Procedure, Participation, Rights</a><br />
<em> Robert G. Bone</em>, Page 1011</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/MACEDO.pdf">Against Majoritarianism: Democratic Values and Institutional Design</a><br />
<em> Stephen Macedo</em>, Page 1029</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/WALDRON.pdf">A Majority in the Lifeboat</a><br />
<em> Jeremy Waldron</em>, Page 1043</p>
<p><strong>RESPONSE</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/DWORKIN_R.pdf">Response</a><br />
<em>Ronald Dworkin</em>, Page 1059</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/boston-university-law-review-902-april-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston University Law Review, 88:4 (October 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/boston_universi_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/boston_universi_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Oct 2008 18:17:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston University Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston University)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/boston-university-law-review-884-october-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston University Law Review, 88:4 (October 2008)</p>
<p>For prior issues, please visit our website.</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Brian Galle, Federal Grants, State Decisions, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 875 (2008)</p>
<p>Michelle Adams, Stifling the Potential of Grutter v. Bollinger:  Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 937 (2008)</p>
<p>Joanna M. Shepherd, Frederick Tung &#038; Albert H. Yoon, What Else Matters for Corporate Governance?: The Case of Bank Monitoring, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 991 (2008)</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Achal Oza, Amend the ECPA: Fourth Amendment Protection Erodes as E-Mails Get Dusty, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 1043 (2008)</p>
<p>Anne M. Macrander, Bloggers as Newsmen: Expanding the Testimonial Privilege, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 1075 (2008)</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BU logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BU%20logo.jpg" width="500" height="158" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html">Boston University Law Review, 88:4 (October 2008)</a></p>
<p><em>For <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/archives.html">prior issues</a>, please visit our website.</em></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Brian Galle, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n4/documents/GALLE-FederalGrants.pdf"><em>Federal Grants, State Decisions</em></a>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 875 (2008)</p>
<p>Michelle Adams, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n4/documents/ADAMS-StiflingthePotential.pdf">Stifling the Potential of <i>Grutter v. Bollinger</i>: <i> Parents Involved in Community Schools v. Seattle School District No. 1</i></a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 937 (2008)</p>
<p>Joanna M. Shepherd, Frederick Tung &#038; Albert H. Yoon, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n4/documents/YOON-WhatElseMatters.pdf">What Else Matters for Corporate Governance?: The Case of Bank Monitoring</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 991 (2008)</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Achal Oza, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n4/documents/OZA-AmendtheECPA.pdf">Amend the ECPA: Fourth Amendment Protection Erodes as E-Mails Get Dusty</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 1043 (2008)</p>
<p>Anne M. Macrander, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n4/documents/MACRANDER-BloggersasNewsmen.pdf">Bloggers as Newsmen: Expanding the Testimonial Privilege</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 1075 (2008)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/boston_universi_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston University Law Review, 88:3 (June 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/boston_universi_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/boston_universi_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Jul 2008 07:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston University Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston University)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/boston-university-law-review-883-june-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston University Law Review, 88:3 (June 2008)</p>
<p>For prior issues, please visit our website.</p>
<p>Tribute</p>
<p>Tribute: To William E. Ryckman, Jr., 88 B.U. L. Rev. 577 (2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Helen Norton, The Measure of Government Speech: Identifying Expression&#8217;s Source, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 587 (2008)</p>
<p>Omer Kimhi, Reviving Cities: Legal Remedies to Municipal Financial Crises, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 633 (2008)</p>
<p>Book Review</p>
<p>Roberta R. Kwall, The Author as Steward &#8220;For Limited Times&#8221;, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 685 (2008)</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Joshua M. Daniels, &#8220;Lost in Translation&#8221;: Anime, Moral Rights, and Market Failure, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 709 (2008)</p>
<p>Christiaan Highsmith, The Liberty-Speech Framework: Resolving the Tension Between Foreign Affairs Power and First Amendment Freedoms, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 745 (2008)</p>
<p>Benjamin B. Strawn, Do Judicial Ethics Canons Affect Perceptions of Judicial Impartiality?, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 781 (2008)</p>
<p>Replies [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BU logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BU%20logo.jpg" width="500" height="158" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html">Boston University Law Review, 88:3 (June 2008)</a></p>
<p><em>For <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/archives.html">prior issues</a>, please visit our website.</em></p>
<p><strong>Tribute</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n3/documents/TRIBUTE.pdf"><em>Tribute: To William E. Ryckman, Jr.</em></a>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 577 (2008)</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Helen Norton, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n3/documents/NORTON.pdf"><em>The Measure of Government Speech: Identifying Expression&#8217;s Source</em></a>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 587 (2008)</p>
<p>Omer Kimhi, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n3/documents/KIMHI.pdf">Reviving Cities: Legal Remedies to Municipal Financial Crises</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 633 (2008)</p>
<p><strong>Book Review</strong></p>
<p>Roberta R. Kwall, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n3/documents/KWALL.pdf">The Author as Steward &#8220;For Limited Times&#8221;</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 685 (2008)</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Joshua M. Daniels, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n3/documents/DANIELS.pdf">&#8220;Lost in Translation&#8221;: Anime, Moral Rights, and Market Failure</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 709 (2008)</p>
<p>Christiaan Highsmith, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n3/documents/HIGHSMITH.pdf">The Liberty-Speech Framework: Resolving the Tension Between Foreign Affairs Power and First Amendment Freedoms</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 745 (2008)</p>
<p>Benjamin B. Strawn, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n3/documents/STRAWN.pdf">Do Judicial Ethics Canons Affect Perceptions of Judicial Impartiality?</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 781 (2008)</p>
<p><strong>Replies &#038; Response</strong></p>
<p><strong>To Scott Baker, <em>Should We Pay Federal Circuit Judges More?</em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 63 (2008)</strong></p>
<p>Frank B. Cross, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n3/documents/CROSS.pdf">Perhaps We Should Pay Federal Circuit Judges More</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 815 (2008)</p>
<p>Christopher Zorn, William D. Henderson &#038; Jason J. Czarnezki, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n3/documents/ZORN.pdf">Working Class Judges</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 829 (2008)</p>
<p>Stephen Marks, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n3/documents/MARKS.pdf">A Common on the Relationship Between Judicial Salary and Judicial Quality</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 843 (2008)</p>
<p>Scott Baker, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume88n3/documents/BAKER.pdf">Refining the Judicial Salary/Judicial Performance Debate: A Response to Professors Cross, Czarnezki, Henderson, Marks, and Zorn</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 855 (2008)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/boston_universi_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston University Law Review, 88:2 (April 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/boston_universi_4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/boston_universi_4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 17:04:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston University Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston University)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/05/boston-university-law-review-882-april-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston University Law Review, 88:2 (April 2008)</p>
<p>For prior issues, please visit our website.</p>
<p>SYMPOSIUM: THE ROLE OF THE PRESIDENT IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY</p>
<p>Contents</p>
<p>Introduction, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 321 (2008)</p>
<p>Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash, A Taxonomy of Presidential Powers, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 327 (2008)</p>
<p>Robert D. Sloane, The Scope of Executive Power in the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 341 (2008)</p>
<p>Michael D. Ramsey, Presidential Originalism?, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 353 (2008)</p>
<p>Gary Lawson, What Lurks Beneath: NSA Surveillance and Executive Power, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 375 (2008)</p>
<p>Dawn E. Johnsen, What’s a President To Do? Interpreting the Constitution in the Wake of Bush Administration Abuses, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 395 (2008)</p>
<p>John Yoo, Jefferson and Executive Power, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 421 (2008)</p>
<p>Neal Devins &#038; David E. Lewis, Not-So [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BU logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BU%20logo.jpg" width="500" height="158" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html">Boston University Law Review, 88:2 (April 2008)</a></p>
<p><em>For <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/archives.html">prior issues</a>, please visit our website.</em></p>
<p><strong>SYMPOSIUM: THE ROLE OF THE PRESIDENT IN THE TWENTY-FIRST CENTURY</strong></p>
<p><strong>Contents</strong></p>
<p><em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/INTRO.pdf">Introduction</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 321 (2008)</p>
<p>Saikrishna Bangalore Prakash, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/PRAKASH.pdf"><em>A Taxonomy of Presidential Powers</em></a>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 327 (2008)</p>
<p>Robert D. Sloane, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/SLOANE.pdf">The Scope of Executive Power in the Twenty-First Century: An Introduction</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 341 (2008)</p>
<p>Michael D. Ramsey, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/RAMSEY.pdf">Presidential Originalism?</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 353 (2008)</p>
<p>Gary Lawson, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/LAWSON.pdf">What Lurks Beneath: NSA Surveillance and Executive Power</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 375 (2008)</p>
<p>Dawn E. Johnsen, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/JOHNSEN.pdf">What’s a President To Do? Interpreting the Constitution in the Wake of Bush Administration Abuses</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 395 (2008)</p>
<p>John Yoo, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/YOO.pdf">Jefferson and Executive Power</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 421 (2008)</p>
<p>Neal Devins &#038; David E. Lewis, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/DEVINS.pdf">Not-So Independent Agencies: Party Polarization and the Limits of Institutional Design</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 459 (2008)</p>
<p>Julian E. Zelizer, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/ZELIZER.pdf">The Conservative Embrace of Presidential Power</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 499 (2008)</p>
<p>William P. Marshall, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/MARSHALL.pdf">Eleven Reasons Why Presidential Power Inevitably Expands and Why It Matters</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 505 (2008)</p>
<p>Harold J. Krent, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/KRENT.pdf">From a Unitary to a Unilateral Presidency</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 523 (2008)</p>
<p>Daniela Caruso, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/CARUSO.pdf">(Presidential) Powers in the European Union</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 561 (2008)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/boston_universi_4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston University Law Review, 88:1 (February 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/boston_universi_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/boston_universi_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 06:08:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston University Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston University)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/boston-university-law-review-881-february-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston University Law Review, 88:1 (February 2008)</p>
<p>For prior issues, please visit our website.</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>J.B. Ruhl, Climate Change and the Endangered Species Act: Building Bridges to the No-Analog Future, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 1 (2008)</p>
<p>Scott Baker, Should We Pay Federal Circuit Judges More?, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 63 (2008)</p>
<p>Eric A. Johnson, Causal Relevance in the Law of Search and Seizure, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 113 (2008)</p>
<p>Scott A. Moss &#038; Douglas M. Raines, The Intriguing Federalist Future of Reproductive Rights, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 175 (2008)</p>
<p>Philip G. Peters, Jr., Health Courts?, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 227 (2008)</p>
<p>Note</p>
<p>James R. Gadwood, The Framework Comes Crumbling Down: JuryQuest in a Batson World, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 291 (2008)</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BU logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BU%20logo.jpg" width="500" height="158" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html">Boston University Law Review, 88:1 (February 2008)</a></p>
<p><em>For <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/archives.html">prior issues</a>, please visit our website.</em></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>J.B. Ruhl, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/RUHL.pdf">Climate Change and the Endangered Species Act: Building Bridges to the No-Analog Future</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 1 (2008)</p>
<p>Scott Baker, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/BAKER.pdf">Should We Pay Federal Circuit Judges More?</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 63 (2008)</p>
<p>Eric A. Johnson, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/JOHNSON.pdf">Causal Relevance in the Law of Search and Seizure</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 113 (2008)</p>
<p>Scott A. Moss &#038; Douglas M. Raines, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/MOSS.pdf">The Intriguing Federalist Future of Reproductive Rights</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 175 (2008)</p>
<p>Philip G. Peters, Jr., <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/PETERS.pdf">Health Courts?</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 227 (2008)</p>
<p><strong>Note</strong></p>
<p>James R. Gadwood, <em><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/GADWOOD.pdf">The Framework Comes Crumbling Down: JuryQuest in a Batson World</a></em>, 88 B.U. L. Rev. 291 (2008)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/boston_universi_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston University Law Review, 87:5 (December 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/boston_universi_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/boston_universi_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Jan 2008 23:34:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston University Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston University)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/01/boston-university-law-review-875-december-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston University Law Review, 87:5 (December 2007)</p>
<p>For prior issues, please visit our website.</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Alan L. Durham, Patent Symmetry, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 969 (2007)</p>
<p>Stephen Choi and Marcel Kahan, The Market Penalty for Mutual Fund Scandals, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 1021 (2007)</p>
<p>Kenworthy Bilz, The Puzzle of Delegated Revenge, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 1059 (2007)</p>
<p>Paul Diller, Intrastate Preemption, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 1113 (2007)</p>
<p>Luke M. Milligan, A Theory of Stability: John Rawls, Fetal Homicide, and Substantive Due Process, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 1177 (2007)</p>
<p>Note</p>
<p>Mark Glover, Timely Filing in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Cases: Does Rule 3002(C)’s Deadline Apply to Secured Creditors?, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 1231 (2007)</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BU logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BU%20logo.jpg" width="500" height="158" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html">Boston University Law Review, 87:5 (December 2007)</a></p>
<p><em>For <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/archives.html">prior issues</a>, please visit our website.</em></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Alan L. Durham, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume87n5/documents/DURHAM_v2.pdf"><em>Patent Symmetry</em></a>, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 969 (2007)</p>
<p>Stephen Choi and Marcel Kahan, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume87n5/documents/KAHAN_v2.pdf"><em>The Market Penalty for Mutual Fund Scandals</em></a>, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 1021 (2007)</p>
<p>Kenworthy Bilz, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume87n5/documents/BILZ_v2.pdf"><em>The Puzzle of Delegated Revenge</em></a>, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 1059 (2007)</p>
<p>Paul Diller, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume87n5/documents/DILLER_v2.pdf"><em>Intrastate Preemption</em></a>, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 1113 (2007)</p>
<p>Luke M. Milligan, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume87n5/documents/MILLIGAN_v2.pdf"><em>A Theory of Stability: John Rawls, Fetal Homicide, and Substantive Due Process</em></a>, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 1177 (2007)</p>
<p><strong>Note</strong></p>
<p>Mark Glover, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/volume87n5/documents/GLOVER_v2.pdf"><em>Timely Filing in Chapter 13 Bankruptcy Cases: Does Rule 3002(C)’s Deadline Apply to Secured Creditors?</em></a>, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 1231 (2007)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/boston_universi_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston University Law Review, 87:4 (October 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/boston_universi.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/boston_universi.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 06:54:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston University Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston University)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/11/boston-university-law-review-874-october-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston University Law Review, 87:4 (October 2007)</p>
<p>For prior issues, please visit our website.</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Mitchell M. Gans and Jay A. Soled, Reforming the Gift Tax and Making It Enforceable, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 759 (2007)</p>
<p>Gregory E. Maggs, A Concise Guide to the Federalist Papers as a Source of the Original Meaning of the United States Constitution, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 801 (2007)</p>
<p>Lecture</p>
<p>Kathryn Abrams, Women and Antiwar Protest: Rearticulating Gender and Citizenship, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 849 (2007)</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Jason Englund, Small Town Defenders or Constitutional Foes: Does the Hazleton, PA Anti-Illegal-Immigration Ordinance Encroach on Federal Power?, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 883 (2007)</p>
<p>Mark Esposito, Massachusetts Pay Equity and Its Limits, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 911 (2007)</p>
<p>Renee E. Williams, Third Party Consent Searches After Georgia v. Randolph: Dueling Approaches to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BU logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BU%20logo.jpg" width="500" height="158" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/index.html">Boston University Law Review, 87:4 (October 2007)</a></p>
<p><em>For <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/archives.html">prior issues</a>, please visit our website.</em></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Mitchell M. Gans and Jay A. Soled, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/SOLED.pdf"><em>Reforming the Gift Tax and Making It Enforceable</em></a>, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 759 (2007)</p>
<p>Gregory E. Maggs, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/MAGGS.pdf"><em>A Concise Guide to the Federalist Papers as a Source of the Original Meaning of the United States Constitution</em></a>, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 801 (2007)</p>
<p><strong>Lecture</strong></p>
<p>Kathryn Abrams, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/ABRAMS.pdf"><em>Women and Antiwar Protest: Rearticulating Gender and Citizenship</em></a>, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 849 (2007)</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Jason Englund, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/ENGLUND.pdf"><em>Small Town Defenders or Constitutional Foes: Does the Hazleton, PA Anti-Illegal-Immigration Ordinance Encroach on Federal Power?</em></a>, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 883 (2007)</p>
<p>Mark Esposito, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/ESPOSITO.pdf"><em>Massachusetts Pay Equity and Its Limits</em></a>, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 911 (2007)</p>
<p>Renee E. Williams, <a href="http://www.bu.edu/law/central/jd/organizations/journals/bulr/documents/WILLIAMS.pdf"><em>Third Party Consent Searches After</em> Georgia v. Randolph<em>: Dueling Approaches to the Dueling Roommates</em></a>, 87 B.U. L. Rev. 937 (2007)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/boston_universi.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

