<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Law Rev (Boston College)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/category/law-rev-boston-college/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:4 (September 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-504-september-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-504-september-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:4 (September 2009)
</p>
<p>Remarks
</p>
<p>Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, Flexibility and Optimism in an Unpredictable World, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 941 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>Miriam Hechler Baer, Governing Corporate Compliance, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 949 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Lawrence A. Hamermesh &#38; Michael L. Wachter, Rationalizing Appraisal Standards in Compulsory Buyouts, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1021 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Carissa Byrne Hessick, Ineffective Assistance at Sentencing, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1069 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Gary Lawson &#38; Robert D. Sloane, The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico&#8217;s Legal Status Reconsidered, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1123 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Jesse H. Alderman, Crying Wolf: The Unlawful Delisting of Northern Rocky Mountain Gray Wolves from Endangered Species Act Protections, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1195 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Adam M. Leamon, Section 108 of the I.R.C. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg" alt="Boston College Law Review Logo" /></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:4 (September 2009)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Remarks</b>
</p>
<p>Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, <i>Flexibility and Optimism in an Unpredictable World</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 941 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/01_bernanke.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Miriam Hechler Baer, <i>Governing Corporate Compliance</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 949 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/02_baer.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Lawrence A. Hamermesh &amp; Michael L. Wachter, <i>Rationalizing Appraisal Standards in Compulsory Buyouts</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1021 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/03_hamermesh%20%26%20wachter.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Carissa Byrne Hessick, <i>Ineffective Assistance at Sentencing</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1069 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/04_hessick.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Gary Lawson &amp; Robert D. Sloane, <i>The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico&#8217;s Legal Status Reconsidered</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1123 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/05_lawson-sloane.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Jesse H. Alderman, <i>Crying Wolf: The Unlawful Delisting of Northern Rocky Mountain Gray Wolves from Endangered Species Act Protections</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1195 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/06_alderman.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Adam M. Leamon, <i>Section 108 of the I.R.C. and the Inclusion of </i>Tufts<i> Gain: A Proposal for Reform</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1243 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/07_leamon.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Caitlin M. Mulligan, <i>From AAA to F: How the Credit Rating Agencies Failed America and What Can Be Done to Protect Investors</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1275 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/08_mulligan.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-504-september-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:3 (May 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-503-may-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-503-may-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:3 (May 2009)
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>William K. Sjostrom, Jr., Carving a New Path to Equity Capital and Share Liquidity, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 639 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Brian Z. Tamanaha, The Distorting Slant in Quantitative Studies of Judging, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 685 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Suja A. Thomas, The Fallacy of Dispositive Procedure, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 759 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Bruce J. Winick, The Supreme Court&#8217;s Evolving Death Penalty Jurisprudence: Severe Mental Illness as the Next Frontier, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 785 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Reagan S. Bissonnette, Reasonably Accommodating Nonmitigating Plaintiffs After the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 859 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>James D. Myers, Bringing the Vice President into the Fold: Executive Immunity and the Vice Presidency, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 897 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Contents of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"/></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:3 (May 2009)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>William K. Sjostrom, Jr., <i>Carving a New Path to Equity Capital and Share Liquidity</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 639 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/01_sjostrom.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Brian Z. Tamanaha, <i>The Distorting Slant in Quantitative Studies of Judging</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 685 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/02_tamanaha.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Suja A. Thomas, <i>The Fallacy of Dispositive Procedure</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 759 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/03_thomas.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Bruce J. Winick, <i>The Supreme Court&#8217;s Evolving Death Penalty Jurisprudence: Severe Mental Illness as the Next Frontier</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 785 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/04_winick.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Reagan S. Bissonnette, <i>Reasonably Accommodating Nonmitigating Plaintiffs After the ADA Amendments Act of 2008</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 859 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/05_bissonette.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>James D. Myers, <i>Bringing the Vice President into the Fold: Executive Immunity and the Vice Presidency</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 897 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/06_myers.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-503-may-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:2 (March 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/boston_college_7.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/boston_college_7.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/04/boston-college-law-review-issue-502-march-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:2 (March 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Kimberly Jenkins Robinson, The Constitutional Future of Race-Neutral Efforts to Achieve Diversity and Avoid Racial Isolation in Elementary and Secondary Schools, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 277 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p> Fabio Arcila, Jr., The Framers&#8217; Search Power: The Misunderstood Statutory History of Suspicion &#038; Probable Cause, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 363 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Margit Livingston, Inspiration or Imitation: Copyright Protection for Stage Directions, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 427 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Mark S. Stein, Nussbaum: A Utilitarian Critique, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 489 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Kristen MacIsaac, Medicare&#8217;s August Rule: Necessary Step Toward Minimizing Federal Spending or Overbroad Decision Leading to Higher Malpractice Costs?, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 533 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Jacob Tabor, Students&#8217; First Amendment Rights in the Age of the Internet: Off-Campus Cyberspeech [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:2 (March 2009)</b></p>
<p><b>Articles</b></p>
<p>Kimberly Jenkins Robinson, <i>The Constitutional Future of Race-Neutral Efforts to Achieve Diversity and Avoid Racial Isolation in Elementary and Secondary Schools</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 277 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/01_robinson.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p> Fabio Arcila, Jr., <i>The Framers&#8217; Search Power: The Misunderstood Statutory History of Suspicion &#038; Probable Cause</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 363 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/02_arcila.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Margit Livingston, <i>Inspiration or Imitation: Copyright Protection for Stage Directions</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 427 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/03_livingston.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Essay</b></p>
<p>Mark S. Stein, <i>Nussbaum: A Utilitarian Critique</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 489 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/04_stein.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Notes</b></p>
<p>Kristen MacIsaac, <i>Medicare&#8217;s August Rule: Necessary Step Toward Minimizing Federal Spending or Overbroad Decision Leading to Higher Malpractice Costs?</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 533 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/05_macisaac.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Jacob Tabor, <i>Students&#8217; First Amendment Rights in the Age of the Internet: Off-Campus Cyberspeech and School Regulation</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 561 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/06_tabor.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Peter Tipps, <i>Controlling the Lead Paint Debate: Why Control Is Not an Element of Public Nuisance</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 605 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/07_tipps.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/boston_college_7.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:1 (January 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/boston_college_6.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/boston_college_6.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/boston-college-law-review-issue-501-january-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:1 (January 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Elena Baylis, Reassessing the Role of International Criminal Law: Rebuilding National Courts Through Transnational Networks, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Adam Candeub, An Economic Theory of Criminal Excuse, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 87 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>David Fagundes, Crystals in the Public Domain, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 139 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Emily Barbour, Separate and Invisible: Alternative Education Programs and Our Educational Rights, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 197 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Tim Castelli, Not Guilty by Association: Why the Taint of Their &#8220;Blank Check&#8221; Predecessors Should Not Stunt the Growth of Modern Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 237 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Contents of current and past issues are available at our website.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:1 (January 2009)</b></p>
<p><b>Articles</b></p>
<p>Elena Baylis, <i>Reassessing the Role of International Criminal Law: Rebuilding National Courts Through Transnational Networks</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/02_baylis.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Adam Candeub, <i>An Economic Theory of Criminal Excuse</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 87 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/03_candeub.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>David Fagundes, <i>Crystals in the Public Domain</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 139 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/04_fagundes.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Notes</b></p>
<p>Emily Barbour, <i>Separate and Invisible: Alternative Education Programs and Our Educational Rights</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 197 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/05_barbour.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Tim Castelli, <i>Not Guilty by Association: Why the Taint of Their &#8220;Blank Check&#8221; Predecessors Should Not Stunt the Growth of Modern Special Purpose Acquisition Companies</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 237 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/06_castelli.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/boston_college_6.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:5 (November 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/boston_college_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/boston_college_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/boston-college-law-review-issue-495-november-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:5 (November 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Marc O. DeGirolami, The Problem of Religious Learning, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1213 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Ruth Mason, Made in America for European Tax: The International Consistency Test, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1277 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Richard E. Myers II, Responding to the Time-Base Failures of the Criminal Law Through a Criminal Sunset Amendment, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1327 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p> Douglas G. Smith, The Constitutionality of Civil Commitment and the Requirement of Adequate Treatment, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1383 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Note</p>
<p>Michael K. Avery, Whose Rights? Why States Should Set the Parameters for Federal Honest Services Mail and Wire Fraud Protections, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1431 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Contents of current and past issues are available at our website.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 49:5 (November 2008)</b></p>
<p><b>Articles</b></p>
<p>Marc O. DeGirolami, <i>The Problem of Religious Learning</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1213 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/01_degirolami.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Ruth Mason, <i>Made in America for European Tax: The International Consistency Test</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1277 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/02_mason.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Richard E. Myers II, <i>Responding to the Time-Base Failures of the Criminal Law Through a Criminal Sunset Amendment</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1327 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/03_myers.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p> Douglas G. Smith, <i>The Constitutionality of Civil Commitment and the Requirement of Adequate Treatment</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1383 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/04_smith.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Note</b></p>
<p>Michael K. Avery, <i>Whose Rights? Why States Should Set the Parameters for Federal Honest Services Mail and Wire Fraud Protections</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1431 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/05_avery.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/boston_college_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:4 (September 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/boston_college_4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/boston_college_4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/boston-college-law-review-issue-494-september-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:4 (September 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Donald G. Gifford, Impersonating the Legislature: State Attorneys General and Parens Patriae Product Litigation, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 913 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Thomas A. Piraino, Jr., The Antitrust Implications of &#8220;Going Private&#8221; and Other Changes of Corporate Control, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 971 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Mark DeFeo, Unlocking the iPhone: How Antitrust Law Can Save Consumers from the Inadequacies of Copyright Law, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1037 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Michael Kaneb, Neither Realistic Nor Constitutionally Sound: The Problem of the FCC&#8217;s Community Standard for Broadcast Indecency Determinations, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1081 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Daniel McFadden, A First Amendment Analysis of Military Regulations Restricting the Wearing of Military Uniforms by Members of the Individual Ready Reserve Who Participate in Politically Themed Theatrical Productions, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em></strong><strong>, Issue 49:4 (September 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Donald G. Gifford, <em>Impersonating the Legislature: State Attorneys General and Parens Patriae Product Litigation</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 913 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/01_gifford_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Thomas A. Piraino, Jr., <em>The Antitrust Implications of &#8220;Going Private&#8221; and Other Changes of Corporate Control</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 971 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/02_piraino_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Mark DeFeo, <em>Unlocking the iPhone: How Antitrust Law Can Save Consumers from the Inadequacies of Copyright Law</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1037 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/03_defeo_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Michael Kaneb, <em>Neither Realistic Nor Constitutionally Sound: The Problem of the FCC&#8217;s Community Standard for Broadcast Indecency Determinations</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1081 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/04_kaneb_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Daniel McFadden, <em>A First Amendment Analysis of Military Regulations Restricting the Wearing of Military Uniforms by Members of the Individual Ready Reserve Who Participate in Politically Themed Theatrical Productions</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1131 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/05_mcfadden_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Kevin J. O&#8217;Brien, <em>Federal Regulation of State Employment Under the Commerce Clause and &#8220;National Defense&#8221; Powers: Constitutional Issues Presented by the Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1175 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/06_o%27brien_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available on our website.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/boston_college_4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:3 (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/boston_college_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/boston_college_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/04/boston-college-law-review-issue-493-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:3 (May 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Steven A. Dean, The Incomplete Global Market for Tax Information, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 605 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Jonathan Remy Nash, Economic Efficiency Versus Public Choice: The Case of Property Rights in Road Traffic Management, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 673 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Katherine J. Strandburg, Freedom of Association in a Networked World: First Amendment Regulation of Relational Surveillance, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 741 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Jonathan K. Geldert, Presidential Advisors and Their Most Unpresidential Activities: Why Executive Privilege Cannot Shield White House Information in the U.S. Attorney Firings Controversy, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 823 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>John A. Kupiec, Returning to Principles of &#8220;Fairness and Justice&#8221;: The Role of Investment-Backed Expectations in Total Regulatory Taking Claims, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 865 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Contents [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BC-logo2.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"width="479" height="149" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em>, Issue 49:3 (May 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Steven A. Dean, <em>The Incomplete Global Market for Tax Information</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 605 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/01_dean_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Jonathan Remy Nash, <em>Economic Efficiency Versus Public Choice: The Case of Property Rights in Road Traffic Management</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 673 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/02_nash_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Katherine J. Strandburg, <em>Freedom of Association in a Networked World: First Amendment Regulation of Relational Surveillance</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 741 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/03_strandburg_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Jonathan K. Geldert, <em>Presidential Advisors and Their Most Unpresidential Activities: Why Executive Privilege Cannot Shield White House Information in the U.S. Attorney Firings Controversy</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 823 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/04_geldert_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>John A. Kupiec, <em>Returning to Principles of &#8220;Fairness and Justice&#8221;: The Role of Investment-Backed Expectations in Total Regulatory Taking Claims</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 865 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/05_kupiec_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/boston_college_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:2 (March 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/boston_college_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/boston_college_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/boston-college-law-review-issue-492-march-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:2 (March 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Jonathan H. Adler, Money or Nothing: The Adverse Environmental Consequences of Uncompensated Land Use Controls, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 301 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Nancy Levit, Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>A. Benjamin Spencer, Plausibility Pleading, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 431 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Courtney P. Fain, What’s in a Name? The Worrisome Interchange of Juvenile “Adjudications” with Criminal “Convictions”, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 495 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Jessica L. Lambert, Developing a Legal Framework for Resolving Disputes Between “Adoptive Parents” of Frozen Embryos: A Comparison to Resolutions of Divorce Disputes Between Progenitors, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 529 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>William Trunk, The Scourge of Contextualism: Ceremonial Deism and the Establishment Clause, 49 B.C. L. Rev. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BC-logo2.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"width="479" height="149" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em>, Issue 49:2 (March 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Jonathan H. Adler, <em>Money or Nothing: The Adverse Environmental Consequences of Uncompensated Land Use Controls</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 301 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/01_adler.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Nancy Levit, <em>Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/02_levit.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>A. Benjamin Spencer, <em>Plausibility Pleading</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 431 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/03_spencer.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Courtney P. Fain, <em>What’s in a Name? The Worrisome Interchange of Juvenile “Adjudications” with Criminal “Convictions”</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 495 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/04_fain.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Jessica L. Lambert, <em>Developing a Legal Framework for Resolving Disputes Between “Adoptive Parents” of Frozen Embryos: A Comparison to Resolutions of Divorce Disputes Between Progenitors</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 529 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/05_lambert.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>William Trunk, <em>The Scourge of Contextualism: Ceremonial Deism and the Establishment Clause</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 571 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/06_trunk.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website</p>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/boston_college_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:1 (January 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/boston_college.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/boston_college.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/12/boston-college-law-review-issue-491-january-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:1 (January 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Michael L. Seigel, Corporate America Fights Back: The Battle over Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Jacqueline D. Lipton, Who Owns “Hillary.com”? Political Speech and the First Amendment in Cyberspace, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 55 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Dru Stevenson, Entrapment and Terrorism, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 125 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Rebecca A. Kiselewich, In Defense of the 2006 Title IX Regulations for Single-Sex Public Education: How Separate Can Be Equal, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 217 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Melissa Whitney, The Statistical Evidence of Racial Profiling in Traffic Stops and Searches: Rethinking the Use of Statistics to Prove Discriminatory Intent, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 263 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Contents of current and past issues are available at our website</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BC-logo2.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"width="479" height="149" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em>, Issue 49:1 (January 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Michael L. Seigel, <em>Corporate America Fights Back: The Battle over Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/01_seigel_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Jacqueline D. Lipton, <em>Who Owns “Hillary.com”? Political Speech and the First Amendment in Cyberspace</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 55 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/02_lipton_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Dru Stevenson, <em>Entrapment and Terrorism</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 125 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/03_stevenson_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Rebecca A. Kiselewich,<em> In Defense of the 2006 Title IX Regulations for Single-Sex Public Education: How Separate Can Be Equal</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 217 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/04_kiselewich_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Melissa Whitney, <em>The Statistical Evidence of Racial Profiling in Traffic Stops and Searches: Rethinking the Use of Statistics to Prove Discriminatory Intent</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 263 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/05_whitney_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/boston_college.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 48:5 (November 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/boston_college_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/boston_college_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/11/boston-college-law-review-issue-485-november-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 48:5 (November 2007)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Mary J. Davis, The Battle over Implied Preemption: Products Liability &#038; the FDA, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1089 (2007) [PDF]</p>
<p>Christine A. Klein, The New Nuisance: An Antidote to Wetland Loss, Sprawl, and Global Warming, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1155 (2007) [PDF]</p>
<p>Adam N. Steinman, Reinventing Appellate Jurisdiction, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1237 (2007) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Rebecca L. Puskas, Measure 37’s Federal Law Exception: A Critical Protection for Oregon’s Federally Approved Land Use Laws, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1301 (2007) [PDF]</p>
<p>Adam Mueller, The Implications of Legislative Power: State Constitutions, State Legislatures, and Mid-Decade Redistricting, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1343 (2007) [PDF]</p>
<p>Julie Roman Lackner, The Evolution and Future of Substantial Nexus in State Taxation of Corporate Income, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1387 (2007) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BC-logo2.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg" width="479" height="149" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em>, Issue 48:5 (November 2007)</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Mary J. Davis, <em>The Battle over Implied Preemption: Products Liability &#038; the FDA</em>, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1089 (2007) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/48_5/01_davis_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Christine A. Klein, <em>The New Nuisance: An Antidote to Wetland Loss, Sprawl, and Global Warming</em>, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1155 (2007) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/48_5/02_klein_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Adam N. Steinman, <em>Reinventing Appellate Jurisdiction</em>, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1237 (2007) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/48_5/03_steinman_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Rebecca L. Puskas, <em>Measure 37’s Federal Law Exception: A Critical Protection for Oregon’s Federally Approved Land Use Laws</em>, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1301 (2007) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/48_5/04_livermore-puskas_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Adam Mueller, <em>The Implications of Legislative Power: State Constitutions, State Legislatures, and Mid-Decade Redistricting</em>, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1343 (2007) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/48_5/05_mueller_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Julie Roman Lackner, <em>The Evolution and Future of Substantial Nexus in State Taxation of Corporate Income</em>, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1387 (2007) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/48_5/06_roman-lackner_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/boston_college_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Announcing the Law Review Table of Contents Project</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/announcing_the_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/announcing_the_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Nov 2007 07:10:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Daniel Solove</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Announcements]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Chicago)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Columbia)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (GW)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Georgetown)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Harvard)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Indiana)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Michigan)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Minnesota)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (NYU)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Northwestern)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Notre Dame)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (S Cal)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Stanford)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Texas)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Vanderbilt)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Virginia)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Yale)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/11/announcing-the-law-review-table-of-contents-project.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the Law Review Table of Contents Project.  We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.</p>
<p>The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool.  Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult.  If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published.  Now you don’t have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="table-of-contents1.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/table-of-contents1.jpg" width="379" height="293" ></p>
<p>I’m pleased to announce a new feature at Concurring Opinions – the <a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/law_rev_contents/">Law Review Table of Contents Project</a>.  We have invited a number of the top law reviews to post the table of contents to their new issues and to provide links to the articles if they are posted on the law review’s website.</p>
<p>The goal of the Table of Contents Project is to provide you with a useful research tool.  Finding out about the latest law review publications can be difficult.  If you’re like me, you rarely read the physical issues of law reviews anymore; and you don’t have time to constantly keep checking each law review’s website to see if a new issue has been published.  Now you don’t have to.   Just keep reading Concurring Opinions, and information about the latest law review scholarship will be brought to you – all in one place!</p>
<p>Each journal’s tables of contents will be archived in two categories: (1) a category called <a href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/law_rev_contents/">Law Rev Contents</a> – collecting all the law review table of contents postings; and (2) a category for each specific law review.</p>
<p>Participating law reviews thus far include:</p>
<p>* Boston College</p>
<p>* Chicago</p>
<p>* Columbia</p>
<p>* Cornell</p>
<p>* Duke</p>
<p>* Emory</p>
<p>* Fordham</p>
<p>* Georgetown</p>
<p>* GW</p>
<p>* Harvard</p>
<p>* Indiana</p>
<p>* Michigan</p>
<p>* Minnesota</p>
<p>* NYU</p>
<p>* Northwestern</p>
<p>* Notre Dame</p>
<p>* Southern California</p>
<p>* Stanford</p>
<p>* Texas</p>
<p>* UCLA</p>
<p>* Vanderbilt</p>
<p>* Virginia</p>
<p>* Washington University</p>
<p>* Yale</p>
<p>We still have a bunch of open invitations, so we anticipate that the number of participants will grow. Unfortunately, we cannot include all law reviews, as this will overwhelm the regular content of our blog.</p>
<p>We hope that you find this new feature to be helpful.  We’re very excited about it here, as we believe that this will be of great use to keep you informed about new legal scholarship.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/announcing_the_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
