Author: Vanderbilt Law Review

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 4 (May 2010)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 4 (May 2010)

ARTICLES

Brad Snyder, Taking Great Cases: Lessons from the Rosenberg Case, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 885 (2010)

Randall Thomas, Erin O’Hara & Kenneth Martin, Arbitration Clauses in CEO Employment Contracts: An Empirical and Theoretical Analysis, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 959 (2010)

Tess Wilkinson-Ryan & David A. Hoffman, Breach Is For Suckers, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1003 (2010)

NOTES

Katherin J. Chapman, The Untouchables: Private Military Contractors’ Criminal Accountability under the UCMJ, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1047 (2010)

Gregory W. Traylor, Big Tobacco, Medicaid-Covered Smokers, and the Substance of the Master Settlement Agreement, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1081 (2010)

Nancy Danforth Zeronda, Street Shootings: Covert Photography and Public Privacy, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1131 (2010)

Interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Check out our website for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 3 (April 2010)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 3 (April 2010)

ARTICLES

Lisa Schultz Bressman & Robert B. Thompson, The Future of Agency Independence, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 533 (2010).

Daniel A. Crane, Optimizing Private Antitrust Enforcement, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 675 (2010).

Nantiya Ruan, Facilitating Wage Theft: How Courts Use Procedural Rules to Undermine Substantive Rights of Low-Wage Workers, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 727 (2010).

Edward Rubin, Assisted Suicide, Morality, and Law: Why Prohibiting Assisted Suicide Violates the Establishment Clause, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 763 (2010).

NOTES

Richard Aaron Chastain, Cleaning Up Punitive Damages: A Statutory Solution for Unguided Punitive-Damages Awards in Maritime Cases, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 813 (2010).

Alison Virginia King, Constitutionality of Cyberbullying Laws: Keeping the Online Playground Safe for Both Teens and Free Speech, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 845 (2010).

Interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Check out our website for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 2 (March 2010)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 2 (March 2010)

ARTICLES

Adam M. Gershowitz, Statewide Capital Punishment: The Case for Eliminating Counties’ Role in the Death Penalty, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 307 (2010).

Margaret H. Lemos, The Consequences of Congress’s Choice of Delegate: Judicial and Agency Interpretations of Title VII, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 363 (2010).

Jessica L. Roberts, Preempting Discrimination: Lessons from the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 439 (2010).

NOTES

Ashley Bassel, Order at the End of Life: Establishing a Clear and Fair Mechanism for the Resolution of Futility Disputes, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 491 (2010).

Timothy Brandon Waddell, Bringing It All Back Home: Establishing a Coherent Constitutional Framework for the Re-regulation of Homeschooling, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 541 (2010).

Interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Check out our website for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc Skilling Roundtable

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to present its latest Roundtable on Skilling v. United States. Professor Nancy King lays the foundation for the Roundtable with her introduction, and professors Julie O’Sullivan and Ellen Podgor and practitioners William Farmer, Abbe Lowell, and Timothy O’Toole offer their first takes on the case.


Nancy J. King, Introduction: Skilling v. United States, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 1 (2010).

William H. Farmer, Presumed Prejudiced, but Fair?, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 5 (2010)

Abbe David Lowell, Christopher D. Man & Paul M. Thompson, “Not Every Wrong is a Crime”: The Legal and Practical Problems with the Federal “Honest-Services” Statute, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 11 (2010).

Julie R. O’Sullivan, Honest-Services Fraud: A (Vague) Threat to Millions of Blissfully Unaware (and Non-Culpable) American Workers, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 23 (2010).

Timothy P. O’Toole, The Honest-Services Surplus: Why There’s No Need (or Place) for a Federal Law Prohibiting “Criminal-esque” Conduct in the Nature of Bribes and Kickbacks, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 49 (2010).

Ellen S. Podgor, Intangible Rights-A Déjà Vu, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 63 (2010).

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 1 (January 2010)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 1 (January 2010)

ARTICLES

Jennifer G. Hill, Subverting Shareholder Rights: Lessons from News Corp.’s Migration to Delaware, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1 (2010).

Brian Sheppard & Fiery Cushman, Evaluating Norms: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Norm-Content, Operator, and Charitable Behavior, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 55 (2010).

Charles Silver & Geoffrey P. Miller, The Quasi-Class Action Method of Managing Multi-District Litigations: Problems and a Proposal, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 107 (2010).

Verity Winship, Cooperative Interbranch Federalism: Certification of State-Law Questions by Federal Agencies, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 181 (2010).

NOTES

Benjamin K. Raybin, “Objection: Your Honor is Being Unreasonable!”-Law and Policy Opposing the Federal Sentencing Order Objection Requirement, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 235 (2010).

Jennifer Bennett Shinall, Slipping Away from Justice: The Effect of Attorney Skill on Trial Outcomes, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 267 (2010).

Interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Check out our website for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc PCAOB Roundtable

Logo

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to present the response pieces, as well as Professor Strauss’s table setting article, for its inaugural Roundtable. Professors Peter Strauss, Hal Bruff, Steven Calabresi, Gary Lawson, and Christopher Yoo have responded to the “first take” articles each wrote last month. The debate is on Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

TABLE SETTING ARTICLE

Peter L. Strauss, Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 51 (2009).

RESPONSES

Peter L. Strauss, Our Twenty-First Century Constitution, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 121 (2009).

Harold H. Bruff, On Hunting Elephants in Mouseholes, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 127 (2009).

Steven G. Calabresi & Christopher S. Yoo, Why Professors Bruff and Pildes are Wrong about the PCAOB Case, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 133 (2009).

Gary Lawson, It Depends, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 139 (2009).

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 62, Number 6 (November 2009)

Logo

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 62, Number 6 (November 2009)

ARTICLES

Brian T. Fitzpatrick, The End of Objector Blackmail?, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1623 (2009).

Raymond Shih Ray Ku, Jiayang Sun & Yiying Fan, Does Copyright Law Promote Creativity? An Empirical Analysis of Copyright’s Bounty, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1669 (2009).

William E. Nelson, Harvey Rishikof, I. Scott Messinger & Michael Jo, The Liberal Tradition of the Supreme Court Clerkship: Its Rise, Fall, and Reincarnation?, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1749 (2009).

Noah M. Sachs, Jumping the Pond: Transnational Law and the Future of Chemical Regulation, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1817 (2009).

NOTES

Joel A. Heller, Fearing Fear Itself: Photo Identification Laws, Fear of Fraud, and the Fundamental Right to Vote, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1871 (2009)

Ryan T. Holt, A Uniform System for the Enforceability of Forum Selection Clauses in Federal Courts, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1913 (2009).

Michael A. Thomason, Jr., Auditing the PCAOB: A Test to the Accountability of the Uniquely Structured Regulator of Accountants, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1953 (2009).

Interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Check out our website for more details.

1

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc PCAOB Roundtable

Logo

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to present the “first take” pieces for its inaugural Roundtable from Professors Hal Bruff, Steven Calabresi, Gary Lawson, Rick Pildes, and Christopher Yoo. The debate is on Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Professor Peter Strauss’s previously laid the foundation for the debate with his introductory piece. We will also be publishing response pieces from the professors on December 7.

Harold H. Bruff, Bringing the Independent Agencies in from the Cold, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 63 (2009).

Gary Lawson, The “Principal” Reason Why the PCAOB is Unconstitutional, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 73 (2009).

Richard H. Pildes, Putting Power Back Into Separation of Powers Analysis: Why the SEC-PCAOB Structure is Constitutional, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 85 (2009).

Steven G. Calabresi & Christopher S. Yoo, Remove Morrison v. Olson, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 103 (2009).

1

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 62, Number 5 (October 2009)

vlr3

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 62, Number 5 (October 2009)

ARTICLES

Kerry Abrams, The Hidden Dimension of Nineteenth-Century Immigration Law, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1353 (2009).

Robert A. Mikos, On the Limits of Supremacy: Medical Marijuana and the States’ Overlooked Power to Legalize Federal Crime, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1421 (2009).

Alan R. Palmiter & Ahmed E. Taha, Star Creation: The Incubation of Mutual Funds, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1485

COMMENT

Andrew R. Gould, The Hidden Second Amendment Framework within District of Columbia v. Heller, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1535 (2009).

NOTE

Christopher Hamp-Lyons, The Dragon in the Room: China’s Anti-Monopoloy Law and International Merger Review, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1577 (2009).

Interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Check out our website for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 62, Number 4 (May 2009)

 

vlr3 

 

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 62, Number 4 (May 2009)

 

ARTICLES

 

Kristin A. Collins, Administering Marriage: Marriage-Based Entitlements, Bureaucracy, and the Legal Construction of the Family, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1085 (2009).

 

Kevin M. Stack, The Reviewability of the President’s Statutory Powers, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1171 (2009).

 

ESSAY

 

Grant Hayden & Matthew Bodie, Arrow’s Theorem and the Exclusive Shareholder Franchise, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1217 (2009).

 

NOTES

 

Lauren Lowe, What Employees Say, or What Employers Do: How Post-Cleveland Decisions Continue to Obscure Discrimination, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1245 (2009).

 

John Benjamin Schrader, Reawakening “Privileges or Immunities”: An Originalist Blueprint for Invalidating State Felon Disenfranchisement Laws, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1285 (2009).

 

Charles Thompson Switzer, Escaping the Takings Maze: Impact Fees and the Limits of the Takings Clause, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1315 (2009).

 

Interested in writing a response to one of these articles? Check out our website to find out how.