Author Archive for vanderbilt-law-review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 65, Number 1 (January 2012)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 65, Number 1 (January 2012).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is proud to announce the publication of our January issue.

ARTICLES

Darian M. Ibrahim, The New Exit in Venture Capital, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 1 (2012).

Lloyd Hitoshi Mayer, The “Independent” Sector: Fee-for-Service Charity and the Limits of Autonomy, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 51 (2012).

Timothy Zick, Falsely Shouting Fire in a Global Theater: Emerging Complexities of Transborder Expression, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 125 (2012).

NOTES

Caroline Cecot, Blowing Hot Air: An Analysis of State Involvement in Greenhouse Gas Litigation, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 189 (2012).

Mike Dreyfuss, My Fellow Americans, We Are Going to Kill You: The Legality of Targeting and Killing U.S. Citizens Abroad, 65 Vand. L. Rev. 249 (2012).

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

January 31, 2012 at 5:31 pm Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt), Uncategorized Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 64, Number 6 (November 2011)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 64, Number 6 (November 2011)

The Vanderbilt Law Review is proud to announce the publication of our November issue. This issue follows a conference hosted on April 1, 2011 titled Rigs, Risk, and Responsibility: Conference on the BP Oil Spill.

CONFERENCE

W. Kip Viscusi & Richard J. Zeckhauser, Deterring and Compensating Oil-Spill Catastrophes: The Need for Strict and Two-Tier Liability, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1717 (2011).

Kenneth S. Abraham, Catastrophic Oil Spills and the Problem of Insurance, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1769 (2011).

Joseph E. Aldy, Real-Time Economic Analysis and Policy Development During the BP Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1795 (2011).

Edward B. Barbier, Coastal Wetland Restoration and the Deepwater Horizon Oil Spill, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1821 (2011).

Mark A. Cohen, Madeline Gottlieb, Joshua Linn & Nathan Richardson, Deepwater Drilling: Law, Policy, and Economics of Firm Organization and Safety, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1853 (2011).

Bruce L. Hay, Christopher Rendall-Jackson & David Rosenberg, Litigating BP’s Contribution Claims in Publicly Subsidized Courts: Should Contracting Parties Pay Their Own Way?, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1919 (2011).

Erin O’Hara O’Connor, Organizational Apologies: BP as a Case Study, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1959 (2011).

Steven Shavell, Should BP Be Liable for Economic Losses Due to the Moratorium on Oil Drilling Imposed After the Deepwater Horizon Accident?, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1995 (2011).

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit our website for more details.

November 30, 2011 at 1:37 am Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 64, Number 5 (October 2011)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 64, Number 5 (October 2011)

The Vanderbilt Law Review is proud to announce the publication of our October issue. This issue includes tributes to Professor Richard A. Nagareda.

RICHARD A. NAGAREDA, IN MEMORIAM

Andrew R. Gould, Foreword, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1397 (2011).

J. Maria Glover, Tribute Essay, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1401 (2011).

John C.P. Goldberg, Tribute Essay, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1409 (2011).

Chris Guthrie, Tribute Essay, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1415 (2011).

Samuel Issacharoff, Tribute Essay, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1419 (2011).

Suzanna Sherry, Tribute Essay, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1423 (2011).

ARTICLES

R. Michael Cassidy, Plea Bargaining, Discovery, and the Intractable Problem of Impeachment Disclosures, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1429 (2011).

Sean B. Seymore, Patently Impossible, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1491 (2011).

Tess Wilkinson-Ryan, Breaching the Mortgage Contract: The Behavioral Economics of Strategic Default, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1547 (2011).

NOTES

Jenna G. Farleigh, Splitting the Baby: Standardizing Issue Class Certification, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1585 (2011).

Nathan Pysno, Should Twombly and Iqbal Apply to Affirmative Defenses?, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1633 (2011).

Gavin Reinke, When a Promise Isn’t a Promise: Public Employers’ Ability to Alter Pension Plans of Retired Employees, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1673 (2011).

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit our website for more details.

October 26, 2011 at 4:40 pm Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt), Uncategorized Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc Golan Roundtable

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to present our current Roundtable on Golan v. Holder, which is to be argued at the Supreme Court on October 5, 2011. In Golan, the Court will consider whether Congress may constitutionally confer copyright on works that have fallen into the public domain. Congress created a new class of “restored” works in 1996 in order to fulfill its obligations under the Berne Convention, an international copyright treaty. Professor Tyler T. Ochoa introduces the case, discusses the history of the Berne Convention, and analyzes how the Court’s decision will affect the idea of the public domain. Professor Daniel Gervais takes a closer look at the Berne Convention. He argues that Berne is a flexible document and that Congress provided greater protection to restored works than is actually required by the treaty. Dale Nelson, Senior Intellectual Property Counsel at Warner Bros., questions whether restoration has had as significant an effect on the public domain as its detractors believe. She argues that the benefits of restoring foreign works to copyright greatly outweigh the burdens to users. Professor David Olson looks at Golan’s constitutional questions from a perspective not emphasized in the parties’ briefs. He argues that, because restoration is in violation of the Progress Clause, the Government can assert no legitimate interest to support its claim that restoration does not unconstitutionally restrict the Petitioners’ First Amendment speech rights. Finally, Professor Elizabeth Townsend Gard takes a detailed look at the mechanics of the statute enacting copyright restoration. In her view, the statute does not achieve the Government’s stated interests and transgresses the traditional contours of copyright. She provides several recommendations for statutory amendments that would make determination of public domain status a more manageable exercise.

Tyler T. Ochoa, Is the Copyright Public Domain Irrevocable? An Introduction to Golan v. Holder, 64 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 123 (2011).

Daniel Gervais, Golan v. Holder: A Look at the Constraints Imposed by the Berne Convention, 64 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 147 (2011).

Dale Nelson, Golan Restoration: Small Burden, Big Gains, 64 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 165 (2011).

David S. Olson, A Legitimate Interest in Promoting the Progress of Science: Constitutional Constraints on Copyright Laws, 64 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 185 (2011).

Elizabeth Townsend Gard, In the Trenches with § 104A: An Evaluation of the Parties’ Arguments in Golan v. Holder as It Heads to the Supreme Court, 64 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 199 (2011).

October 3, 2011 at 3:17 pm Tags: copyright, First Amendment, Supreme Court Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 64, Number 4 (May 2011)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 64, Number 4 (May 2011)

Congratulations and a special thank you to the outgoing editorial board!

ARTICLES

Eleanor Marie Lawrence Brown, Visa as Property, Visa as Collateral, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1047 (2011)

Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Optimal Lead Plaintiffs, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1109 (2011)

O. Carter Snead, Memory and Punishment, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1195 (2011)

NOTES

Michael G. Bowers, Implementing an Online Dispute Resolution Scheme: Using Domain Name Registration Contracts to Create a Workable Framework, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1265 (2011)

Steven J. Haymore, Public(ly Oriented) Companies: B Corporations and the Delaware Stakeholder Provision Dilemma, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1311 (2011)

Seth M. Hyatt, Text Offenders: Privacy, Text Messages, and the Failure of the Title III Minimization Requirement, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1347 (2011)

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit our website for more details.

May 30, 2011 at 4:40 am Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 64, Number 3 (April 2011)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 64, Number 3 (April 2011)

ARTICLES

Mark Bartholomew & Patrick F. McArdle, Causing Infringement, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 675 (2011)

Michelle M. Harner & Jamie Marincic, Committee Capture? An Empirical Analysis of the Role of Creditors’ Committees in Business Reorganizations, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 749 (2011)

Herbert Hovenkamp & Christopher R. Leslie, The Firm as Cartel Manager, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 813 (2011)

Jay Tidmarsh, Procedure, Substance, and Erie, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 877 (2011)

NOTES

Lauren Z. Curry, Agents in Secrecy: The Use of Information Surrogates in Trust Administration, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 925 (2011)

James M. Gottry, Just Shoot Me: Public Accommodation Anti-Discrimination Laws Take Aim at First Amendment Freedom of Speech, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 961 (2011)

Rachel E. Moore, Giving It Another Shot: A Reexamination of the “Second or Subsequent Conviction” Language of the Firearm Possession Sentencing Statute, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1005 (2011)

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit our website for more details.

April 27, 2011 at 7:19 pm Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 64, Number 2 (March 2011)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 64, Number 2 (March 2011)

SYMPOSIUM

Kenneth R. Feinberg, Symposium on Executive Compensation Keynote Address, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 349 (2011)

Ruth Bender, Paying for Advice: The Role of the Remuneration Consultant in U.K. Listed Companies, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 361 (2011)

Martin J. Conyon, Executive Compensation Consultants and CEO Pay, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 399 (2011)

Guido Ferrarini & Maria Cristina Ungureanu, Economics, Politics, and the International Principles for Sound Compensation Practices: An Analysis of Executive Pay at European Banks, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 431 (2011)

M. Todd Henderson, Insider Trading and CEO Pay, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 505 (2011)

Jennifer G. Hill, Ronald W. Masulis & Randall S. Thomas, Comparing CEO Employment Contract Provisions: Differences Between Australia and the United States, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 559 (2011)

David I. Walker, Evolving Executive Equity Compensation and the Limits of Optimal Contracting, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 611 (2011)

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit our website for more details.

March 30, 2011 at 5:01 pm Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt), Uncategorized Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 64, Number 1 (January 2011)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 64, Number 1 (January 2011)

ARTICLES

J.B. Ruhl & James Salzman, Gaming the Past: The Theory and Practice of Historic Baselines in the Administrative State, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 1 (2011)

Anthony J. Sebok, The Inauthentic Claim, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 61 (2011)

Dan Simon, The Limited Diagnosticity of Criminal Trials, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 143 (2011)

NOTES

Barbara R. Barreno, In Search of Guidance: An Examination of Past, Present, and Future Adjudications of Domestic Violence Asylum Claims, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 225 (2011)

Carter T. Coker, Hope-Fulfilling or Effectively Chilling? Reconciling the Hate Crimes Prevention Act With the First Amendment, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 271 (2011)

Lauren N. Fromme, Unreliable Securities for Retirement Income Security: Certifying the ERISA Stock-Drop Class, 64 Vand. L. Rev. 301 (2011)

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit our website for more details.

January 30, 2011 at 8:26 pm Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 6 (November 2010)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 6 (November 2010)

ARTICLES

Shyamkrishna Balganesh, The Pragmatic Incrementalism of Common Law Intellectual Property, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1543 (2010)

David Gray, Punishment as Suffering, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1619 (2010)

Jamie Henikoff Moffitt, Merging in the Shadow of the Law: The Case for Consistent Judicial Efficiency Analysis, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1697 (2010)

NOTES

Anne D. Gooch, Admitting Guilt by Professing Innocence: When Sentence Enhancements Based on Alford Pleas Are Unconstitutional, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1755 (2010)

Keith Hollingshead-Cook, Another Can of Crawford Worms: Certificates of Nonexistence of Public Record and the Confrontation Clause, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1793 (2010)

Niels Jensen, How to Kill the Scapegoat: Addressing Offshore Tax Evasion with a Special View to Switzerland, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1823 (2010)

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit our website for more details.

November 23, 2010 at 1:06 pm Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc Dukes Roundtable

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to present its latest Roundtable on Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.. Professor Elizabeth Burch’s introductory piece lays the foundation for the debate. Professors Robert Bone, Alexandra Lahav, Greg Mitchell, and Richard Nagareda are providing their “first takes” on the case. We hope you find the Roundtable informative and engaging.

Elizabeth Chamblee Burch, Introduction: Dukes v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 77 (2010).

Robert G. Bone, Sorting Through the Certification Muddle, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 105 (2010)

Alexandra D. Lahav, The Curse of Bigness and the Optimal Size of Class Actions, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 117 (2010).

Gregory Mitchell, Good Causes and Bad Science, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 133 (2010).

Richard A. Nagareda, Common Answers for Class Certification, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 149 (2010).

November 1, 2010 at 11:56 pm Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 5 (October 2010)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 5 (October 2010)

ARTICLES

Afra Afsharipour, Transforming the Allocation of Deal Risk Through Reverse Termination Fees, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1161 (2010)

Wayne A. Logan, Erie and Federal Criminal Courts, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1243 (2010)

Neil M. Richards, The Puzzle of Brandeis, Privacy, and Speech, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1295 (2010)

Paul Rose, Common Agency and the Public Corporation, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1355 (2010)

NOTES

David M. Barnes, Shotgun Weddings: Director and Officer Fiduciary Duties in Government-Controlled and Partially-Nationalized Corporations, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1419 (2010)

Ryan M. Davis, Trimming the “Judicial Oak”: Rule 10b5-2(b)(1), Confidentiality Agreements, and the Proper Scope of Insider Trading Liability, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1469 (2010)

Jacob William Neu, “Workers of God”: The Holy See’s Liability for Clerical Sexual Abuse, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1507 (2010)

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit our website for more details.

October 28, 2010 at 1:35 am Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 4 (May 2010)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 4 (May 2010)

ARTICLES

Brad Snyder, Taking Great Cases: Lessons from the Rosenberg Case, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 885 (2010)

Randall Thomas, Erin O’Hara & Kenneth Martin, Arbitration Clauses in CEO Employment Contracts: An Empirical and Theoretical Analysis, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 959 (2010)

Tess Wilkinson-Ryan & David A. Hoffman, Breach Is For Suckers, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1003 (2010)

NOTES

Katherin J. Chapman, The Untouchables: Private Military Contractors’ Criminal Accountability under the UCMJ, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1047 (2010)

Gregory W. Traylor, Big Tobacco, Medicaid-Covered Smokers, and the Substance of the Master Settlement Agreement, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1081 (2010)

Nancy Danforth Zeronda, Street Shootings: Covert Photography and Public Privacy, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1131 (2010)

Interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Check out our website for more details.

June 7, 2010 at 7:11 pm Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 3 (April 2010)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 3 (April 2010)

ARTICLES

Lisa Schultz Bressman & Robert B. Thompson, The Future of Agency Independence, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 533 (2010).

Daniel A. Crane, Optimizing Private Antitrust Enforcement, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 675 (2010).

Nantiya Ruan, Facilitating Wage Theft: How Courts Use Procedural Rules to Undermine Substantive Rights of Low-Wage Workers, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 727 (2010).

Edward Rubin, Assisted Suicide, Morality, and Law: Why Prohibiting Assisted Suicide Violates the Establishment Clause, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 763 (2010).

NOTES

Richard Aaron Chastain, Cleaning Up Punitive Damages: A Statutory Solution for Unguided Punitive-Damages Awards in Maritime Cases, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 813 (2010).

Alison Virginia King, Constitutionality of Cyberbullying Laws: Keeping the Online Playground Safe for Both Teens and Free Speech, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 845 (2010).

Interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Check out our website for more details.

May 2, 2010 at 10:11 am Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 2 (March 2010)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 2 (March 2010)

ARTICLES

Adam M. Gershowitz, Statewide Capital Punishment: The Case for Eliminating Counties’ Role in the Death Penalty, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 307 (2010).

Margaret H. Lemos, The Consequences of Congress’s Choice of Delegate: Judicial and Agency Interpretations of Title VII, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 363 (2010).

Jessica L. Roberts, Preempting Discrimination: Lessons from the Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 439 (2010).

NOTES

Ashley Bassel, Order at the End of Life: Establishing a Clear and Fair Mechanism for the Resolution of Futility Disputes, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 491 (2010).

Timothy Brandon Waddell, Bringing It All Back Home: Establishing a Coherent Constitutional Framework for the Re-regulation of Homeschooling, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 541 (2010).

Interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Check out our website for more details.

March 30, 2010 at 7:14 am Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc Skilling Roundtable

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to present its latest Roundtable on Skilling v. United States. Professor Nancy King lays the foundation for the Roundtable with her introduction, and professors Julie O’Sullivan and Ellen Podgor and practitioners William Farmer, Abbe Lowell, and Timothy O’Toole offer their first takes on the case.

Nancy J. King, Introduction: Skilling v. United States, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 1 (2010).

William H. Farmer, Presumed Prejudiced, but Fair?, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 5 (2010)

Abbe David Lowell, Christopher D. Man & Paul M. Thompson, “Not Every Wrong is a Crime”: The Legal and Practical Problems with the Federal “Honest-Services” Statute, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 11 (2010).

Julie R. O’Sullivan, Honest-Services Fraud: A (Vague) Threat to Millions of Blissfully Unaware (and Non-Culpable) American Workers, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 23 (2010).

Timothy P. O’Toole, The Honest-Services Surplus: Why There’s No Need (or Place) for a Federal Law Prohibiting “Criminal-esque” Conduct in the Nature of Bribes and Kickbacks, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 49 (2010).

Ellen S. Podgor, Intangible Rights-A Déjà Vu, 63 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 63 (2010).

March 26, 2010 at 9:06 am Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 1 (January 2010)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 63, Number 1 (January 2010)

ARTICLES

Jennifer G. Hill, Subverting Shareholder Rights: Lessons from News Corp.’s Migration to Delaware, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 1 (2010).

Brian Sheppard & Fiery Cushman, Evaluating Norms: An Empirical Analysis of the Relationship between Norm-Content, Operator, and Charitable Behavior, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 55 (2010).

Charles Silver & Geoffrey P. Miller, The Quasi-Class Action Method of Managing Multi-District Litigations: Problems and a Proposal, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 107 (2010).

Verity Winship, Cooperative Interbranch Federalism: Certification of State-Law Questions by Federal Agencies, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 181 (2010).

NOTES

Benjamin K. Raybin, “Objection: Your Honor is Being Unreasonable!”-Law and Policy Opposing the Federal Sentencing Order Objection Requirement, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 235 (2010).

Jennifer Bennett Shinall, Slipping Away from Justice: The Effect of Attorney Skill on Trial Outcomes, 63 Vand. L. Rev. 267 (2010).

Interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Check out our website for more details.

February 3, 2010 at 9:03 am Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc PCAOB Roundtable

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Logo

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to present the response pieces, as well as Professor Strauss’s table setting article, for its inaugural Roundtable. Professors Peter Strauss, Hal Bruff, Steven Calabresi, Gary Lawson, and Christopher Yoo have responded to the “first take” articles each wrote last month. The debate is on Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

TABLE SETTING ARTICLE

Peter L. Strauss, Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 51 (2009).

RESPONSES

Peter L. Strauss, Our Twenty-First Century Constitution, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 121 (2009).

Harold H. Bruff, On Hunting Elephants in Mouseholes, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 127 (2009).

Steven G. Calabresi & Christopher S. Yoo, Why Professors Bruff and Pildes are Wrong about the PCAOB Case, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 133 (2009).

Gary Lawson, It Depends, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 139 (2009).

December 16, 2009 at 6:44 am Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 62, Number 6 (November 2009)

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Logo

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 62, Number 6 (November 2009)

ARTICLES

Brian T. Fitzpatrick, The End of Objector Blackmail?, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1623 (2009).

Raymond Shih Ray Ku, Jiayang Sun & Yiying Fan, Does Copyright Law Promote Creativity? An Empirical Analysis of Copyright’s Bounty, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1669 (2009).

William E. Nelson, Harvey Rishikof, I. Scott Messinger & Michael Jo, The Liberal Tradition of the Supreme Court Clerkship: Its Rise, Fall, and Reincarnation?, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1749 (2009).

Noah M. Sachs, Jumping the Pond: Transnational Law and the Future of Chemical Regulation, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1817 (2009).

NOTES

Joel A. Heller, Fearing Fear Itself: Photo Identification Laws, Fear of Fraud, and the Fundamental Right to Vote, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1871 (2009)

Ryan T. Holt, A Uniform System for the Enforceability of Forum Selection Clauses in Federal Courts, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1913 (2009).

Michael A. Thomason, Jr., Auditing the PCAOB: A Test to the Accountability of the Uniquely Structured Regulator of Accountants, 62 Vand. L. Rev. 1953 (2009).

Interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Check out our website for more details.

December 1, 2009 at 9:36 am Posted in: Law Rev (Vanderbilt) Print This Post No Comments

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc PCAOB Roundtable

posted by Vanderbilt Law Review

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to present the “first take” pieces for its inaugural Roundtable from Professors Hal Bruff, Steven Calabresi, Gary Lawson, Rick Pildes, and Christopher Yoo. The debate is on Free Enterprise Fund v. Public Company Accounting Oversight Board. Professor Peter Strauss’s previously laid the foundation for the debate with his introductory piece. We will also be publishing response pieces from the professors on December 7.

Harold H. Bruff, Bringing the Independent Agencies in from the Cold, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 63 (2009).

Gary Lawson, The “Principal” Reason Why the PCAOB is Unconstitutional, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 73 (2009).

Richard H. Pildes, Putting Power Back Into Separation of Powers Analysis: Why the SEC-PCAOB Structure is Constitutional, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 85 (2009).

Steven G. Calabresi & Christopher S. Yoo, Remove Morrison v. Olson, 62 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 103 (2009).

November 2, 2009 at 2:37 pm Posted in: Uncategorized Print This Post One Comment