Author: Vanderbilt Law Review

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 67, Number 5

The Vanderbilt Law Review is pleased to announce the publication of our October 2014 issue:

ARTICLES

Mehrsa Baradaran, Regulation by Hypothetical, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 1247 (2014).

Matthew R. Ginther et al., The Language of Mens Rea, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 1327 (2014).

Anna Su, Speech Beyond Borders: Extraterritoriality and the First Amendment, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 1373 (2014).

NOTES

Philip L. Lu, Trademarked for Death? A Licensee’s Trademark Rights After an Executory Contract Is Rejected in Bankruptcy, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 1431 (2014).

Courtney J. Mitchell, Keep Your Friends Close: A Framework for Addressing Rights to Social Media Contacts, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 1459 (2014).

Tom S. Xu, Confrontation and the Law of Evidence: Can the Language Conduit Theory Survive in the Wake of Crawford?, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 1497 (2014).

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 67, Number 4

The Vanderbilt Law Review is pleased to announce the publication of our May 2014 issue:

 

ARTICLES

Peter B. Rutledge & Christopher R. Drahozal, “Sticky” Arbitration Clauses? The Use of Arbitration Clauses After Concepcion and Amex, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 955 (2014).

Jane K. Stoever, Enjoining Abuse: The Case for Indefinite Domestic Violence Protection Orders, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 1015 (2014).

 

ESSAY

Hon. J. Harvie Wilkinson III, In Defense of American Criminal Justice, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 1099 (2014).

 

NOTES

Michael Deshmukh, Is FINRA a State Actor? A Question that Exposes the Flaws of the State Action Doctrine and Suggests a Way to Redeem It, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 1173 (2014).

Laura Emmy Malament, Making or Breaking Your Billion Dollar Case: U.S. Judicial Assistance to Private International Arbitration Under 28 U.S.C. § 1782(a), 67 Vand. L. Rev. 1213 (2014).

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 67, Number 1

The Vanderbilt Law Review is pleased to announce the publication of our January 2014 issue:

ARTICLES

Robin Kundis Craig & J.B. Ruhl, Designing Administrative Law for Adaptive Management, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 1 (2014).

Joshua A. Douglas, The Right to Vote Under State Constitutions, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 89 (2014).

Joanna Shepherd, Uncovering the Silent Victims of the American Medical Liability System, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 151 (2014).

 

REVIEW ESSAY

David J. Garrow, Toward a Definitive History of Griggs v. Duke Power, Co., 67 Vand. L. Rev. 197 (2014).

 

NOTES

Andrea J. Sinclair, Delimiting Title VII: Reverse Religious Discrimination and Proxy Claims in Employment Discrimination Litigation, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 239 (2014).

William R. Weaver, Multiple-Agency Delegations & One-Agency Chevron, 67 Vand. L. Rev. 275 (2014).

 

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc also recently published an Essay by Samuel Bray on Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.. Read the Essay at the link below.

Samuel L. Bray, A Little Bit of Laches Goes a Long Way: Notes on Petrella v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc., 67 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 1 (2014).

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 5

The Vanderbilt Law Review is pleased to announce the publication of our October 2013 issue:

ARTICLES

L. Rush Atkinson, The Fourth Amendment’s National Security Exception: Its History and Limits, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1343 (2013).

John M. Newman, Copyright Freeconomics, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1409 (2013).

Monica Youn, The Chilling Effect and the Problem of Private Action, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1437 (2013).

 

NOTES

Keane A. Barger, Be a Liar or You’re Fired! First Amendment Protection for Public Employees Who Object to Their Employer’s Criminal Demands?, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1541 (2013).

Cameron T. Norris, Your Right to Look Like an Ugly Criminal: Resolving the Circuit Split over Mug Shots and the Freedom of Information Act, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1573 (2013).

Michael Snow, Seeing Through the Murky Vial: Does the FDA Have the Authority to Stop Compounding Pharmacies from Pirate Manufacturing?, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1609 (2013).

 

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc Roundtable

En Banc, the online companion to the Vanderbilt Law Review, recently published the first part of its semiannual Roundtable on the upcoming case DaimlerChrysler AG v. Bauman, set to be argued before the Court on October 15, 2013. We assembled a cadre of esteemed authors, all with vastly different takes on what the Court might have to say as it addresses unresolved issues of general personal jurisdiction.

Link: http://www.vanderbiltlawreview.org/enbanc/roundtable/daimlerchrysler-ag-v-bauman/

Authors:
Donald Childress III, Professor of Law, Pepperdine
Howard Erichson, Professor of Law, Fordham
Burt Neuborne, Inez Milholland Professor of Civil Liberties, NYU
Suzanna Sherry, Herman O. Loewenstein Professor of Law, Vanderbilt
Linda Silberman, Martin Lipton Professor of Law, NYU

Thanks for visiting our site!

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 4 (May 2013)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 4 (May 2013).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is pleased to announce the publication of our May 2013 issue.
Congratulations to the class of 2013 and a special thank you to the outgoing editorial board for a great year!

 

ARTICLES

Sean J. Griffith & Alexandra D. Lahav, The Market for Preclusion in Merger Litigation, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1053 (2013).

Adam J. Kolber, Against Proportional Punishment, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1141 (2013).

D. Theodore Rave, Governing the Anticommons in Aggregate Litigation, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1183 (2013).

 

NOTES

Amy E. Sanders, A Gap in the Affordable Care Act: Will Tax Credits Be Available for Insurance Purchased Through Federal Exchanges?, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1259 (2013).

Andrew Tunnard, Not-So-Sweet Sixteen: When Minor Convictions Have Major Consequences Under Career Offender Guidelines, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1309 (2013).

 

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc – Roundtable: The JOBS Act and SEC Rulemaking

Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc is pleased to present our Spring 2013 Roundtable, which considers the SEC’s rulemaking authority under the JOBS Act of April 2012.

Practicing securities attorney Douglas Ellenoff, and Professors Usha Rodrigues and Andrew Schwartz each consider the public policy rationales of the JOBS Act, its legislative history, congressional intent, and practical considerations in order to offer some friendly advice to new Chairman Mary Jo White and the Commission.

Mr. Ellenoff and Prof. Schwartz focus on the rules required or allowed relating to crowdfunding under Title III of the Act, while Prof. Rodrigues examines the lifting of the ban on solicitation and advertising of securities offered to accredited investors under Title II. We hope you find this Roundtable informative and engaging.

Roundtable Essays

Making Crowdfunding CREDIBLE
Douglas S. Ellenoff · 66 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 19 (2013)

In Search of Safe Harbor: Suggestions for the New Rule 506(c)
Usha Rodrigues · 66 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 29 (2013)

Keep It Light, Chairman White: SEC Rulemaking Under the CROWDFUND Act
Andrew A. Schwartz · 66 Vand. L. Rev. En Banc 43 (2013)

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 3 (April 2013)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 3 (April 2013).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is pleased to announce the publication of our April 2013 issue.

 

ARTICLES

Daniel Abebe & Aziz Z. Huq, Foreign Affairs Federalism: A Revisionist Approach, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 723 (2013).

Kent Barnett, Resolving the ALJ Quandary, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 797 (2013).

Anna di Robilant, Property: A Bundle of Sticks or a Tree?, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 869 (2013).

 

NOTES

Wesley C. Jackson, Life on Streets and Trails: Fourth Amendment Rights for the Homeless and Homeward Bound, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 933 (2013).

Benjamin J. McMichael, Constitutional Limitations on Punitive Damages: Ambiguous Effects and Inconsistent Justifications, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 961 (2013).

Emilie Winckel, Hardly a Black-and-White Matter: Analyzing the Validity and Protection of Single-Color Trademarks Within the Fashion Industry, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1015 (2013).

 

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 2 (March 2013)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 2 (March 2013).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is pleased to announce the publication of our March 2013 issue.

 

ARTICLES

Eric Biber, Cultivating a Green Political Landscape: Lessons for Climate Change Policy from the Defeat of California’s Proposition 23, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 399 (2013).

Kristin E. Hickman, Unpacking the Force of Law, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 465 (2013).

Michael S. Pardo, The Nature and Purpose of Evidence Theory, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 547 (2013).

 

NOTES

Matthew Chiarizio, An American Tragedy: E-Books, Licenses, and the End of Public Lending Libraries?, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 615 (2013).

Justin P. Gunter, Dual Standards for Third-Party Intervenors: Distinguishing Between Public-Law and Private-Law Intervention, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 645 (2013).

Eric Yeager, Looking For Trouble: An Exploration of How to Regulate Digital Searches, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 685 (2013).

 

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.

0

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 1 (January 2013)

Vanderbilt Law Review, Volume 66, Number 1 (January 2013).

The Vanderbilt Law Review is proud to announce the publication of our January issue.

 

ARTICLES

Tun-Jen Chiang, The Reciprocity of Search, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 1 (2013).

Michael D. Frakes & Melissa F. Wasserman, Does Agency Funding Affect Decisionmaking?: An Empirical Assessment of the PTO’s Granting Patterns, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 67 (2013).

Andrew Kent, Judicial Review for Enemy Fighters: The Court’s Fateful Turn in Ex parte Quirin, the Nazi Saboteur Case, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 153 (2013).

Joanna M. Shepherd, Products Liability and Economic Activity: An Empirical Analysis of Tort Reform’s Impact on Businesses, Employment, and Production, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 257 (2013).

 

NOTES

Taylor M. Owings, Identifying a Maverick: When Antitrust Law Should Protect a Low-Cost Competitor, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 323 (2013).

V. Blair Druhan, Severe or Pervasive: An Analysis of Who, What, and Where Matters When Determining Sexual Harassment, 66 Vand. L. Rev. 355 (2013).

 

Are you interested in writing a response to one of these pieces? Visit Vanderbilt Law Review En Banc for more details.