<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; UCLA Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/author/UCLA-Law-Review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2012 04:43:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review Vol. 58, Issue 5 (June 2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/06/ucla-law-review-vol-58-issue-5-june-2011.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/06/ucla-law-review-vol-58-issue-5-june-2011.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2011 03:42:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[LGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=47461</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58, Issue 5 (June 2011)</p>
<p>
Articles
</p>



Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture: What Is a Copyrighted Work? Why Does It Matter?
Paul Goldstein
1175


Equal Opportunity for Arbitration
Hiro N. Aragaki
1189


Asymmetrical Jurisdiction
Matthew I. Hall
1257













<p>
Comments
</p>



Multiracial Work: Handing Over the Discretionary Judicial Tool of Multiracialism
Scot Rives
1303


Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, and Your Queer: The Need and Potential for Advocacy for LGBTQ Immigrant Detainees
CT Turney
1343








<p>
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/logo.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="70" /></p>
<p><strong>Volume 58, Issue 5 (June 2011)</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
<strong>Articles</strong><br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1730">Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture: What Is a Copyrighted Work? Why Does It Matter?</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Paul Goldstein</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">1175</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1732">Equal Opportunity for Arbitration</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Hiro N. Aragaki</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">1189</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1734">Asymmetrical Jurisdiction</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Matthew I. Hall</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">1257</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1736">Multiracial Work: Handing Over the Discretionary Judicial Tool of Multiracialism</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Scot Rives</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">1303</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1738">Give Me Your Tired, Your Poor, and Your Queer: The Need and Potential for Advocacy for LGBTQ Immigrant Detainees</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">CT Turney</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">1343</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/06/ucla-law-review-vol-58-issue-5-june-2011.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review Vol. 58, Issue 4 (April 2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/04/ucla-law-review-vol-58-issue-4-april-2011.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/04/ucla-law-review-vol-58-issue-4-april-2011.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 Apr 2011 16:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Amazon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Employment Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[First Amendment]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google & Search Engines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Media Law]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=44169</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58, Issue 4 (April 2011)</p>
<p>
Articles
</p>



Digital Exhaustion
Aaron Perzanowski &#38; Jason Schultz
889


Fixing Inconsistent Paternalism Under Federal Employment Discrimination Law
Craig Robert Senn
947


Awakening the Press Clause
Sonja R. West
1025













<p>
Comments
</p>



Still Fair After All These Years? How Claim Preclusion and Issue Preclusion Should Be Modified in Cases of Copyright&#8217;s Fair Use Doctrine
Karen L. Jones
1071


Patenting Everything Under the Sun: Invoking the First Amendment to Limit the Use of Gene Patents
Krysta Kauble
1123













<p>
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/logo.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="70" /></p>
<p><strong>Volume 58, Issue 4 (April 2011)</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
<strong>Articles</strong><br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1677">Digital Exhaustion</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Aaron Perzanowski &amp; Jason Schultz</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">889</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1679">Fixing Inconsistent Paternalism Under Federal Employment Discrimination Law</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Craig Robert Senn</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">947</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1682">Awakening the Press Clause</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Sonja R. West</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">1025</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1685">Still Fair After All These Years? How Claim Preclusion and Issue Preclusion Should Be Modified in Cases of Copyright&#8217;s Fair Use Doctrine</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Karen L. Jones</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">1071</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1689">Patenting Everything Under the Sun: Invoking the First Amendment to Limit the Use of Gene Patents</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Krysta Kauble</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">1123</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/04/ucla-law-review-vol-58-issue-4-april-2011.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review Vol. 58, Issue 3 (February 2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/02/ucla-law-review-vol-58-issue-3-february-2011.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/02/ucla-law-review-vol-58-issue-3-february-2011.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 25 Feb 2011 18:19:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Bankruptcy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Civil Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Courts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Criminal Procedure]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Economic Analysis of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Empirical Analysis of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Evidence Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Indian Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International & Comparative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jurisprudence]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology and Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sociology of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=32615</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58, Issue 3 (February 2011)</p>
<p>
Articles
</p>



Good Faith and Law Evasion
Samuel W. Buell
611


Making Sovereigns Indispensable: Pimentel and the Evolution of Rule 19
Katherine Florey
667


The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences
Jennifer L. Mnookin et al.
725


Commentary on The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences
Joseph P. Bono
781


Commentary on The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences
Judge Nancy Gertner
789


Commentary on The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences
Pierre Margot
795













<p>
Comments
</p>



What&#8217;s Your Position? Amending the Bankruptcy Disclosure Rules to Keep Pace With Financial Innovation
Samuel M. Kidder
803


Defendant Class Actions and Patent Infringement Litigation
Matthew K. K. Sumida
843













<p>
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/logo.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="70" /></p>
<p><strong>Volume 58, Issue 3 (February 2011)</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
<strong>Articles</strong><br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1556">Good Faith and Law Evasion</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Samuel W. Buell</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">611</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1561">Making Sovereigns Indispensable: <em>Pimentel </em>and the Evolution of Rule 19</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Katherine Florey</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">667</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1565">The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Jennifer L. Mnookin et al.</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">725</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1571">Commentary on <em>The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences</em></a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Joseph P. Bono</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">781</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1574">Commentary on <em>The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences</em></a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Judge Nancy Gertner</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">789</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1577">Commentary on <em>The Need for a Research Culture in the Forensic Sciences</em></a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Pierre Margot</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">795</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td></td>
<td></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
</span></p>
<table style="width: 545px;height: 183px" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1580">What&#8217;s Your Position? Amending the Bankruptcy Disclosure Rules to Keep Pace With Financial Innovation</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Samuel M. Kidder</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">803</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1583">Defendant Class Actions and Patent Infringement Litigation</a></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">Matthew K. K. Sumida</td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none">843</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 11pt;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
<td style="text-align: right;font-style: italic;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
<td style="text-align: right;width: 50px;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom;padding-top: 20px;border: 0pt none"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/02/ucla-law-review-vol-58-issue-3-february-2011.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review Vol. 57, Issue 5 (June 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/07/ucla-law-review-vol-57-issue-5-june-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/07/ucla-law-review-vol-57-issue-5-june-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 Jul 2010 23:12:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles and Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Feminism and Gender]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[History of Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Immigration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Humanities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Inequality]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law and Psychology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Practice]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law School]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Psychology and Behavior]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Supreme Court]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=30965</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 57, Issue 5 (June 2010)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Articles</p>



Introduction to the Symposium Issue: Sexuality and Gender Law: The Difference a Field Makes
Nan D. Hunter
1129


Elusive Coalitions: Reconsidering the Politics of Gender and Sexuality
Kathryn Abrams
1135


The Sex Discount
Kim Shayo Buchanan
1149






What Feminists Have to Lose in Same-Sex Marriage Litigation
Mary Ann Case
1199


Lawyering for Marriage Equality
Scott L. Cummings Douglas NeJaime
1235


Sexual and Gender Variation in American Public Law: From Malignant to Benign to Productive
William N. Eskridge, Jr.
1333






Sticky Intuitions and the Future of Sexual Orientation Discrimination
Suzanne B. Goldberg
1375


The Dissident Citizen
Sonia K. Katyal
1415


Raping Like a State
Teemu Ruskola
1477






The Gay Tipping Point
Kenji Yoshino
1537



<p> </p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/logo.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="70" /></p>
<p><strong>Volume 57, Issue 5 (June 2010)</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"> </span></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1262">Introduction to the Symposium Issue: Sexuality and Gender Law: The Difference a Field Makes</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Nan D. Hunter</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">1129</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1267">Elusive Coalitions: Reconsidering the Politics of Gender and Sexuality</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Kathryn Abrams</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">1135</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1269">The Sex Discount</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Kim Shayo Buchanan</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">1149</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1271">What Feminists Have to Lose in Same-Sex Marriage Litigation</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Mary Ann Case</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">1199</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1273">Lawyering for Marriage Equality</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Scott L. Cummings Douglas NeJaime</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">1235</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1275">Sexual and Gender Variation in American Public Law: From Malignant to Benign to Productive</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">William N. Eskridge, Jr.</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">1333</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1277">Sticky Intuitions and the Future of Sexual Orientation Discrimination</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Suzanne B. Goldberg</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">1375</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1279">The Dissident Citizen</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Sonia K. Katyal</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">1415</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1282">Raping Like a State</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Teemu Ruskola</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">1477</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="width: 545px;height: 45px" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1284">The Gay Tipping Point</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Kenji Yoshino</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">1537</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"> </span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/07/ucla-law-review-vol-57-issue-5-june-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review Vol. 57, Issue 4 (April 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/27690.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/27690.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Apr 2010 23:23:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=27690</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 57, Issue 4 (April 2010)</p>
<p>
Articles
</p>



Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture: Facts and the First Amendment
Frederick Schauer
877


The Upside of Intellectual Property’s Downside
Christopher A. Cotropia &#38; James Gibson
921


The False Promise of the Mixed-Income Housing Project
Robert Ellickson
983






Myths and Mechanics of Deterrence:
The Role of Lawsuits in Law Enforcement Decisionmaking
Joanna C. Schwartz
1023



<p>
Comment
</p>



Revising the Revision: Procedural Alternatives to the Arbitration Fairness Act
Bradley Dillon-Coffman
1095













<p>
</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/logo.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="70" /></p>
<p><strong>Volume 57, Issue 4 (April 2010)</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 14pt;"><br />
Articles<br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 340px; font-family: georgia; font-variant: small-caps; padding-left: 20px; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=940">Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture: Facts and the First Amendment</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 120px; font-family: georgia; text-align: right; font-style: italic; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">Frederick Schauer</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 50px; text-align: right; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">877</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 340px; font-family: georgia; font-variant: small-caps; padding-left: 20px; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1186">The Upside of Intellectual Property’s Downside</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 120px; font-family: georgia; text-align: right; font-style: italic; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">Christopher A. Cotropia &amp; James Gibson</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 50px; text-align: right; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">921</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 340px; font-family: georgia; font-variant: small-caps; padding-left: 20px; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1188">The False Promise of the Mixed-Income Housing Project</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 120px; font-family: georgia; text-align: right; font-style: italic; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">Robert Ellickson</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 50px; text-align: right; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">983</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<table style="width: 545px; height: 45px;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 340px; font-family: georgia; font-variant: small-caps; padding-left: 20px; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=1190">Myths and Mechanics of Deterrence:<br />
The Role of Lawsuits in Law Enforcement Decisionmaking</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 120px; font-family: georgia; text-align: right; font-style: italic; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 10pt; vertical-align: bottom;">Joanna C. Schwartz</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 50px; text-align: right; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">1023</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 14pt;"><br />
Comment<br />
</span></p>
<table style="width: 545px; height: 76px;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 340px; font-family: georgia; font-variant: small-caps; padding-left: 20px; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=942">Revising the Revision: Procedural Alternatives to the Arbitration Fairness Act</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 120px; font-family: georgia; text-align: right; font-style: italic; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 10pt; vertical-align: bottom;">Bradley Dillon-Coffman</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 50px; text-align: right; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">1095</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 340px; font-family: georgia; font-variant: small-caps; padding-left: 20px; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 11pt;"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=792"></a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 120px; font-family: georgia; text-align: right; font-style: italic; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 10pt; vertical-align: bottom;"></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 50px; text-align: right; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 340px; font-family: georgia; font-variant: small-caps; padding-left: 20px; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 11pt;"></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 120px; font-family: georgia; text-align: right; font-style: italic; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 10pt; vertical-align: bottom;"></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 50px; text-align: right; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 14pt;"><br />
</span></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/27690.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 57:3</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/ucla-law-review-issue-573.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/ucla-law-review-issue-573.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 03:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26323</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 57, Issue 3</p>
<p>Articles
</p>



The Shadow Terms: Contract Procedure and Unilateral Amendments
David Horton
605


The Many Faces of Promissory Estoppel:  An Empirical Analysis Under the Restatement  (Second) of Contracts
Marco J. Jimenez
669


Portraits of Resistance: Lawyer Responses to Unjust Proceedings
Alexandra D. Lahav
725


A “Standard Clause Analysis” of the Frustration Doctrine and the Material Adverse Change Clause
Andrew A. Schwartz
789



<p>
Comment
</p>



Coercive Discovery and the First Amendment: Towards a Heightened Discoverability Standard
Amy Pomerantz Nickerson
841



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/logo.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="70" /></p>
<p><strong>Volume 57, Issue 3</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 14pt;"><strong>Articles</strong><br />
</span></p>
<table style="width: 545px; height: 260px;" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 340px; font-family: georgia; font-variant: small-caps; padding-left: 20px; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 11pt;"><a class="article" href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=922">The Shadow Terms: Contract Procedure and Unilateral Amendments</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 120px; font-family: georgia; text-align: right; font-style: italic; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">David Horton</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 50px; text-align: right; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">605</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 340px; font-family: georgia; font-variant: small-caps; padding-left: 20px; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 11pt;"><a class="article" href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=924">The Many Faces of Promissory Estoppel:  An Empirical Analysis Under the Restatement  (Second) of Contracts</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 120px; font-family: georgia; text-align: right; font-style: italic; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">Marco J. Jimenez</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 50px; text-align: right; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">669</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 340px; font-family: georgia; font-variant: small-caps; padding-left: 20px; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 11pt;"><a class="article" href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=926">Portraits of Resistance: Lawyer Responses to Unjust Proceedings</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 120px; font-family: georgia; text-align: right; font-style: italic; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">Alexandra D. Lahav</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 50px; text-align: right; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">725</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 340px; font-family: georgia; font-variant: small-caps; padding-left: 20px; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 11pt;"><a class="article" href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=928">A “Standard Clause Analysis” of the Frustration Doctrine and the Material Adverse Change Clause</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 120px; font-family: georgia; text-align: right; font-style: italic; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">Andrew A. Schwartz</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 50px; text-align: right; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">789</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps; font-size: 14pt;"><br />
<strong>Comment</strong><br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 340px; font-family: georgia; font-variant: small-caps; padding-left: 20px; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 11pt;"><a class="article" href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=930">Coercive Discovery and the First Amendment: Towards a Heightened Discoverability Standard</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 120px; font-family: georgia; text-align: right; font-style: italic; padding-top: 20px; font-size: 10pt; vertical-align: bottom;">Amy Pomerantz Nickerson</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none; width: 50px; text-align: right; font-family: georgia; font-size: 10pt; padding-top: 20px; vertical-align: bottom;">841</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/ucla-law-review-issue-573.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review 57:2 (December 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/ucla-law-review-572-december-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/ucla-law-review-572-december-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 15:34:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=23227</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 57, Issue 2 (December 2009)</p>
<p>Articles
</p>



The Unexceptionalism of “Evolving Standards”
Corinna Barrett Lain
365


The (Constitutional) Convention on IP: A New Reading
Dotan Oliar
421



<p>
Comments
</p>



Unborn &#38; Unprotected: The Rights Of The Fetus Under § 1983
Bram Alden
481


An Economic Crisis is a Terrible Thing to Waste: Reforming the Business of Law for a Sustainable and Competitive Future
Erin J. Cox
511


Reaffirming Indian Tribal Court Criminal Jurisdiction Over Non-Indians: An Argument for a Statutory Abrogation of Oliphant
Samuel E. Ennis
553



]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/logo.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="70" /></p>
<p><strong>Volume 57, Issue 2 (December 2009)</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><strong>Articles</strong><br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=878">The Unexceptionalism of “Evolving Standards”</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Corinna Barrett Lain</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">365</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=882">The (Constitutional) Convention on IP: A New Reading</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Dotan Oliar</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">421</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
<strong>Comments</strong><br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=880">Unborn &amp; Unprotected: The Rights Of The Fetus Under § 1983</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Bram Alden</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">481</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=884">An Economic Crisis is a Terrible Thing to Waste: Reforming the Business of Law for a Sustainable and Competitive Future</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Erin J. Cox</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">511</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=886">Reaffirming Indian Tribal Court Criminal Jurisdiction Over Non-Indians: An Argument for a Statutory Abrogation of <em>Oliphant</em></a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Samuel E. Ennis</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">553</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/ucla-law-review-572-december-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review 57:1 (October)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/ucla-law-review-571-october.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/ucla-law-review-571-october.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy (Electronic Surveillance)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy (Law Enforcement)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 57, Issue 1 (October 2009)</p>
<p>
Articles
</p>



From Privacy To Liberty: The Fourth Amendment After Lawrence
Thomas P. Crocker
1


Who Can Sue Over Government Surveillance?
Scott Michelman
71


Leverage in the Board Room: The Unsung Influence of Private Lenders in Corporate Governance
Frederick Tung
115



<p>
Essay
</p>



After the Bailout: Regulating Systemic Moral Hazard
Karl S. Okamoto
183



<p>
Comments
</p>



Evaluating The Public Interest: Regulation Of Industrial Hemp Under The Controlled Substances Act
Christine A. Kolosov
237


Improving The Education Of California’s Juvenile Offenders: An Alternative To Consent Decrees
Stefanie Low
275


The Right to Control One’s Name
Julia Shear Kushner
313



<p>
Discourse
</p>



Getting the Framers Wrong: A Response to Professor Geoffrey Stone
Samuel Calhoun



The Perils of Religious Passion: A Response to Professor Samuel Calhoun
Geoffrey Stone




<p> 
Th UCLA Law Review is also pleased to announce the launch of a our new website.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/logo.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="70" /></p>
<p><strong>Volume 57, Issue 1 (October 2009)</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
Articles<br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=777">From Privacy To Liberty: The Fourth Amendment After <em>Lawrence</em></a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Thomas P. Crocker</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=781">Who Can Sue Over Government Surveillance?</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Scott Michelman</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=783">Leverage in the Board Room: The Unsung Influence of Private Lenders in Corporate Governance</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Frederick Tung</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">115</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
Essay<br />
</span></p>
<table style="width: 545px;height: 45px" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=785">After the Bailout: Regulating Systemic Moral Hazard</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Karl S. Okamoto</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">183</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
Comments<br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=790">Evaluating The Public Interest: Regulation Of Industrial Hemp Under The Controlled Substances Act</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Christine A. Kolosov</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">237</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=792">Improving The Education Of California’s Juvenile Offenders: An Alternative To Consent Decrees</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Stefanie Low</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">275</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=795">The Right to Control One’s Name</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Julia Shear Kushner</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">313</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
Discourse<br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=506">Getting the Framers Wrong: A Response to Professor Geoffrey Stone</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Samuel Calhoun</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=500">The Perils of Religious Passion: A Response to Professor Samuel Calhoun</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Geoffrey Stone</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
Th UCLA Law Review is also pleased to announce the launch of a our <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org">new website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/ucla-law-review-571-october.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review 56:6 (August 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/ucla-law-review-566-august-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/ucla-law-review-566-august-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Law & Beyond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=19856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 56, Issue 6 (August 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Overcoming Overdisclosure: Toward Tax Shelter Detection (pdf)
Joshua D. Blank</p>
<p>First Amendment Enforcement in Government Institutions and Programs (pdf)
Gia B. Lee</p>
<p>Ezra Pound’s Copyright Statute: Perpetual Rights and the Problem of Heirs (pdf)
Robert Spoo</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Nonwaiver Agreements After Federal Rule of Evidence 502: A Glance at Quick-Peek and Clawback Agreements (pdf)
Jessica Wang</p>
<p>Narrowing the Definition of “Dwelling” Under the Fair Housing Act (pdf)
Karen Wong</p>
<p>Addressing Youth Bias Crime (pdf)
Jordan Blair Woods</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/UCLA-logo.jpg" alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p><strong>Volume 56, Issue 6 (August 2009)</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>Articles</strong></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/6/1-1">Overcoming Overdisclosure: Toward Tax Shelter Detection</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/6.1-1.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
<em>Joshua D. Blank</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/6/1-2">First Amendment Enforcement in Government Institutions and Programs</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/6.1-2.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
<em>Gia B. Lee</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/6/1-3">Ezra Pound’s Copyright Statute: Perpetual Rights and the Problem of Heirs</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/6.1-3.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
<em>Robert Spoo</em></p>
<p><strong><em>Comments</em></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/6/2-1">Nonwaiver Agreements After Federal Rule of Evidence 502: A Glance at Quick-Peek and Clawback Agreements</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/6.2-1.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
<em>Jessica Wang</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/6/2-2">Narrowing the Definition of “Dwelling” Under the Fair Housing Act</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/6.2-2.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
<em>Karen Wong</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/6/2-3">Addressing Youth Bias Crime</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/6.2-3.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
<em>Jordan Blair Woods</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/ucla-law-review-566-august-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review 56:5 (June) — Symposium: The Right to Bear Arms after D.C. v. Heller</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/ucla-law-review-565-june-%e2%80%94-symposium-the-right-to-bear-arms-after-dc-v-heller.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/ucla-law-review-565-june-%e2%80%94-symposium-the-right-to-bear-arms-after-dc-v-heller.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=18009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 56, Issue 5 (June 2009)</p>
<p>Symposium: The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms After D.C. v. Heller</p>
<p>Gun Control After Heller: Threats and Sideshows From a Social Welfare Perspective (pdf)
Philip J. Cook, Jens Ludwig, and Adam M. Samaha</p>
<p>Heller, New Originalism, and Law Office History: “Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss” (pdf)
Saul Cornell</p>
<p>Heller and the Triumph of Originalist Judicial Engagement: A Response to Judge Harvie Wilkinson (pdf)
Alan Gura</p>
<p>The Heller Paradox (pdf)
Dennis A. Henigan</p>
<p>A Modern Historiography of the Second Amendment (pdf)
Don B. Kates</p>
<p>The Myth of Big-Time Gun Trafficking and the Overinterpretation of Gun Tracing Data (pdf)
Gary Kleck and Shun-Yung Kevin Wang</p>
<p>Why The Second Amendment Has a Preamble: Original Public Meaning and the Political Culture of Written Constitutions in Revolutionary America (pdf)
David Thomas Konig</p>
<p>The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/UCLA-logo.jpg" alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>Volume 56, Issue 5 (June 2009)</p>
<p><strong>Symposium: The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms After <em>D.C. v. Heller</em></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-1">Gun Control After Heller: Threats and Sideshows From a Social Welfare Perspective</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-1.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Philip J. Cook, Jens Ludwig, and Adam M. Samaha</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-2">Heller, New Originalism, and Law Office History: “Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss”</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-2.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Saul Cornell</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-3">Heller and the Triumph of Originalist Judicial Engagement: A Response to Judge Harvie Wilkinson</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-3.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Alan Gura</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-4">The Heller Paradox</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-4.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Dennis A. Henigan</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-5">A Modern Historiography of the Second Amendment</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-5.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Don B. Kates</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-6">The Myth of Big-Time Gun Trafficking and the Overinterpretation of Gun Tracing Data</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-6.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Gary Kleck and Shun-Yung Kevin Wang</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-7">Why The Second Amendment Has a Preamble: Original Public Meaning and the Political Culture of Written Constitutions in Revolutionary America</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-7.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
David Thomas Konig</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-8">The Second Amendment, Heller, and Originalist Jurisprudence</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-8.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Nelson Lund</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-9">The Supreme Court and the Uses of History: District of Columbia v. Heller</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-9.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Joyce Lee Malcolm</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-10">Heller &amp; Originalism’s Dead Hand — In Theory and Practice</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-10.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Reva B. Siegel</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-11">Permissible Gun Regulations After Heller: Speculations About Method and Outcomes</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-11.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Mark Tushnet</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-12">Implementing the Right To Keep and Bear Arms for Self-Defense: An Analytical Framework and a Research Agenda</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-12.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Eugene Volokh</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-13">Heller&#8217;s Catch-22</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-13.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Adam Winkler</p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
<strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-14">The Right to Know: An Approach to Gun Licenses and Public Access to Government Records</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-14.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Kelsey M. Swanson</p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
The UCLA Law Review would also like to present the <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/membership/">2009-2010 Masthead</a>, and welcome its new staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/ucla-law-review-565-june-%e2%80%94-symposium-the-right-to-bear-arms-after-dc-v-heller.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review 56:4 (April 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/ucla_law_review_11.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/ucla_law_review_11.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teaching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/04/ucla-law-review-564-april-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 56, Issue 4 (April 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>A Constitutional Birthright: The State, Parentage, and the Rights Of Newborn Persons (pdf)</p>
<p>James G. Dwyer</p>
<p>“Which Is To Be Master,” The Judiciary or the Legislature? When Statutory Directives Violate Separation Of Powers (pdf)</p>
<p>Linda D. Jellum</p>
<p>Normative Methods for Lawyers (pdf)</p>
<p>Joseph William Singer</p>
<p>Comment</p>
<p>Sex Outside of the Therapy Hour: Practical and Constitutional Limits on Therapist Sexual Misconduct Regulations (pdf)</p>
<p>S. Wesley Gorman</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>Volume 56, Issue 4 (April 2009)</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/4/1-1">A Constitutional Birthright: The State, Parentage, and the Rights Of Newborn Persons</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/4.1-1.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
<p>James G. Dwyer</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/4/1-2">“Which Is To Be Master,” The Judiciary or the Legislature? When Statutory Directives Violate Separation Of Powers</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/4.1-2.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
<p>Linda D. Jellum</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/4/1-3">Normative Methods for Lawyers</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/4.1-3.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
<p>Joseph William Singer</p>
<p><strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/4/2-1">Sex Outside of the Therapy Hour: Practical and Constitutional Limits on Therapist Sexual Misconduct Regulations</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/4.2-1.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
<p>S. Wesley Gorman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/ucla_law_review_11.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/ucla_law_review_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/ucla_law_review_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Forum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/12/ucla-law-review-discourse.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>56 UCLA Law Review Discourse (December 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Stephen M. Bainbridge, Reflections on Twenty Years of Law Teaching, 56 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 13 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-discourse-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-discourse-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>56 UCLA Law Review Discourse <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/discourse/">(December 2008)</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Stephen M. Bainbridge, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/discourse/?view=56/1/1-1">Reflections on Twenty Years of Law Teaching</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 13</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/ucla_law_review_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 56:2 (December 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/ucla_law_review_8.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/ucla_law_review_8.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/12/ucla-law-review-issue-562-december-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 56:2 (December 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Jeffrey Kahn, International Travel and the Constitution, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 271 (2008).</p>
<p>Carol Sanger, Seeing and Believing: Mandatory Ultrasound and the Path to a Protected Choice, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 351 (2008).</p>
<p>William K. Sjostrom, Jr., The Birth of Rule 144A Equity Offerings, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 409 (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Dale Larson, Unconsciously Regarded as Disabled: Implicit Bias and the Regarded-As Prong of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 451 (2008).</p>
<p>Jordan Blair Woods,  Taking the &#8220;Hate&#8221; Out of Hate Crimes: Applying Unfair Advantage Theory to Justify the Enhanced Punishment of Opportunistic Bias Crimes, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 489 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/2&#038;detail=1">56:2</a> (December 2008).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Jeffrey Kahn, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/2/1-1">International Travel and the Constitution</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 271</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Carol Sanger, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/2/1-2">Seeing and Believing: Mandatory Ultrasound and the Path to a Protected Choice</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 351</span> (2008).</p>
<p>William K. Sjostrom, Jr., <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/2/1-3">The Birth of Rule 144A Equity Offerings</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 409</span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Dale Larson, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/2/2-1">Unconsciously Regarded as Disabled: Implicit Bias and the Regarded-As Prong of the Americans With Disabilities Act</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 451</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Jordan Blair Woods, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/2/2-2"> Taking the &#8220;Hate&#8221; Out of Hate Crimes: Applying Unfair Advantage Theory to Justify the Enhanced Punishment of Opportunistic Bias Crimes</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 489</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/ucla_law_review_8.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 56:1 (October 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/ucla_law_review_9.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/ucla_law_review_9.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/ucla-law-review-issue-561-october-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 56:1 (October 2008).</p>
<p>Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture</p>
<p>Geoffrey R. Stone, The World of the Framers: A Christian Nation?, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 1  (2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Adam M. Gershowitz, The iPhone Meets the Fourth Amendment, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 27  (2008).</p>
<p>Marco J. Jimenez, The Value of a Promise: A Utilitarian Approach to Contract Law Remedies, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 59  (2008).</p>
<p>Sean B. Seymore, Heightened Enablement in the Unpredictable Arts, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 127  (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Erin J. Cox,  Freeing Exercise at Expression&#8217;s Expense: When RFRA Privileges the Religiously Motivated Speaker, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 169 (2008).</p>
<p>Adam I. Kaplan,  The Case for Comparative Fault in Compensating the Wrongfully Convicted, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 227 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1&#038;detail=1">56:1</a> (October 2008).</p>
<p><strong>Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture</strong></p>
<p>Geoffrey R. Stone, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1/1-1">The World of the Framers: A Christian Nation?</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 1 </span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Adam M. Gershowitz, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1/2-1">The iPhone Meets the Fourth Amendment</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 27 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Marco J. Jimenez, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1/2-2">The Value of a Promise: A Utilitarian Approach to Contract Law Remedies</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 59 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Sean B. Seymore, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1/2-3">Heightened Enablement in the Unpredictable Arts</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 127 </span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Erin J. Cox, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1/3-1"> Freeing Exercise at Expression&#8217;s Expense: When RFRA Privileges the Religiously Motivated Speaker</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 169</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Adam I. Kaplan, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1/3-2"> The Case for Comparative Fault in Compensating the Wrongfully Convicted</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 227</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/ucla_law_review_9.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:6 (August 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/ucla_law_review_6.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/ucla_law_review_6.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/09/ucla-law-review-issue-556-august-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:6 (August 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Ann E. Carlson,  Implementing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Caps: A Case Study of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1479  (2008).</p>
<p>Daniel A. Farber, The Place-Based Theory of Standing, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1505  (2008).</p>
<p>Sean B. Hecht, Climate Change and the Transformation of Risk: Insurance Matters, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1559  (2008).</p>
<p>Douglas A. Kysar &#038; Bernadette A. Meyler,  Like a Nation State, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1621  (2008).</p>
<p>Cass R. Sunstein,  The World vs. the United States and China? The Complex Climate Change Incentives of the Leading Greenhouse Gas Emitters, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1675  (2008).</p>
<p>Michael P. Vandenbergh, Jack Barkenbus &#038; Jonathan Gilligan,  Individual Carbon Emissions: The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5&#038;detail=1">55:6</a> (August 2008).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Ann E. Carlson, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-1"> Implementing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Caps: A Case Study of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1479 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Daniel A. Farber, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-2">The Place-Based Theory of Standing</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1505 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Sean B. Hecht, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-3">Climate Change and the Transformation of Risk: Insurance Matters</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1559 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Douglas A. Kysar &#038; Bernadette A. Meyler, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-4"> Like a Nation State</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1621 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Cass R. Sunstein, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-5"> The World vs. the United States and China? The Complex Climate Change Incentives of the Leading Greenhouse Gas Emitters</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1675 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Michael P. Vandenbergh, Jack Barkenbus &#038; Jonathan Gilligan, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-6"> Individual Carbon Emissions: The Low-Hanging Fruit</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1701 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Michael Wara, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-7"> Measuring the Clean Development Mechanism&#8217;s Performance and Potential</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1759 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Jonathan B. Wiener, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-8"> Climate Change Policy and Policy Change in China</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1805 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Jonathan Zasloff, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-9"> The Judicial Carbon Tax: Reconstructing Public Nuisance and Climate Change</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1827 </span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Alina Ball, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/2-1"> An Imperative Redefinition of &#8220;Community&#8221;: Incorporating Reentry Lawyers to Increase the Efficacy of Community Economic Development Initiatives</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1883 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Maureen Carroll, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/2-2"> Educating Expelled Students After No Child Left Behind: Mending an Incentive Structure That Discourages Alternative Education and Reinstatment</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1909 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Amy Riley Lucas, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/2-1"> Specialty License Plates: The First Amendment and the Intersection of Government Speech and Public Forum Doctrines</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1971 </span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/ucla_law_review_6.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/ucla_law_review_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/ucla_law_review_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Forum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/ucla-law-review-discourse-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>56 UCLA Law Review Discourse (October 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Gary Blasi, Lawyers, Clients, and the &#8220;Third Person in the Room&#8221;, 56 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 1 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-discourse-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-discourse-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>56 UCLA Law Review Discourse <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/discourse/">(October 2008)</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Gary Blasi, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/discourse/?view=56/1/1-1">Lawyers, Clients, and the &#8220;Third Person in the Room&#8221;</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 1</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/ucla_law_review_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:5 (June 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/ucla_law_review_4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/ucla_law_review_4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/ucla-law-review-issue-555-june-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:5 (June 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Michelle Wilde Anderson,  Cities Inside Out: Race, Poverty, and Exclusion at the Urban Fringe, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1095 (2008).</p>
<p>Jennifer Gordon &#038; R.A. Lenhardt, Rethinking Work and Citizenship, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1161 (2008).</p>
<p>Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr. &#038; Clint A. Carpenter, The Return of Seditious Libel, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1239 (2008).</p>
<p>Adam J. Levitin,  Priceless? The Economic Costs of Credit Card Merchant Restraints, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1321 (2008).</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Michael L. Kramer &#038; Michael N. Schmitt,  Lawyers on Horseback? Thoughts on Judge Advocates and Civil-Military Relations, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1407 (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Richard J. Hawkins,  Substantially Modifying the Visual Artists Rights Act: A Copyright Proposal for Interpreting the Act&#8217;s Prejudicial Modification Clause, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1437 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5&#038;detail=1">55:5</a> (June 2008).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Wilde Anderson, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5/1-1"> Cities Inside Out: Race, Poverty, and Exclusion at the Urban Fringe</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1095</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Jennifer Gordon &#038; R.A. Lenhardt, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5/1-2">Rethinking Work and Citizenship</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1161</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr. &#038; Clint A. Carpenter, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5/1-3">The Return of Seditious Libel</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1239</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Adam J. Levitin, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5/1-4"> Priceless? The Economic Costs of Credit Card Merchant Restraints</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1321</span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Essay</strong></p>
<p>Michael L. Kramer &#038; Michael N. Schmitt, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5/2-1"> Lawyers on Horseback? Thoughts on Judge Advocates and Civil-Military Relations</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1407</span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Richard J. Hawkins, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5/3-1"> Substantially Modifying the Visual Artists Rights Act: A Copyright Proposal for Interpreting the Act&#8217;s Prejudicial Modification Clause</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1437</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/ucla_law_review_4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:4 (April 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/ucla_law_review_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/ucla_law_review_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/05/ucla-law-review-issue-554-april-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:4 (April 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Josh Bowers,  Contraindicated Drug Courts, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 783 (2008).</p>
<p>Noah Sachs, Beyond the Liability Wall: Strengthening Tort Remedies in International Environmental Law, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 837 (2008).</p>
<p>Joanna M. Shepherd, Tort Reforms&#8217; Winners and Losers: The Competing Effects of Care and Activity Levels, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 905 (2008).</p>
<p>John G. Sprankling,  Owning the Center of the Earth, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 979 (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Megan Roberts,  The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: Why Considering Individuals One at a Time Creates Untenable Situations for Students and Educators, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1041 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/4&#038;detail=1">55:4</a> (April 2008).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Josh Bowers, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/4/1-1"> Contraindicated Drug Courts</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 783</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Noah Sachs, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/4/1-2">Beyond the Liability Wall: Strengthening Tort Remedies in International Environmental Law</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 837</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Joanna M. Shepherd, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/4/1-3">Tort Reforms&#8217; Winners and Losers: The Competing Effects of Care and Activity Levels</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 905</span> (2008).</p>
<p>John G. Sprankling, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/4/1-4"> Owning the Center of the Earth</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 979</span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Megan Roberts, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/4/2-1"> The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: Why Considering Individuals One at a Time Creates Untenable Situations for Students and Educators</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1041</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/ucla_law_review_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:3 (February 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/ucla_law_review_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/ucla_law_review_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/04/ucla-law-review-issue-553-february-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:3 (February 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Stephen M. Bainbridge, The Convergence of Good Faith and Oversight, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 559 (2008).</p>
<p>Kamal Ghali, No Slavery Except as a Punishment for Crime: The Punishment Clause and Sexual Slavery, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 607 (2008).</p>
<p>Caleb E. Mason, An Aesthetic Defense of the Nonprecedential Opinion: The Easy Cases Debate in the Wake of the 2007 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 643 (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Malinda Lee, Reorienting the Debate on Presidential Signing Statements: The Need for Transparency in the President&#8217;s Constitutional Objections, Reservations, and Assertions of Power, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 705 (2008).</p>
<p>Nancy Olson, Does Practice Make Perfect? An Examination of Congress&#8217;s Proposed District Court Patent Pilot Program, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 745 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/3&#038;detail=1">55:3</a> (February 2008).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Stephen M. Bainbridge, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/3/1-1">The Convergence of Good Faith and Oversight</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 559</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Kamal Ghali, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/3/1-2">No Slavery Except as a Punishment for Crime: The Punishment Clause and Sexual Slavery</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 607</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Caleb E. Mason, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/3/1-3">An Aesthetic Defense of the Nonprecedential Opinion: The Easy Cases Debate in the Wake of the 2007 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 643</span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Malinda Lee, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/3/2-1">Reorienting the Debate on Presidential Signing Statements: The Need for Transparency in the President&#8217;s Constitutional Objections, Reservations, and Assertions of Power</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 705</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Nancy Olson, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/3/2-2">Does Practice Make Perfect? An Examination of Congress&#8217;s Proposed District Court Patent Pilot Program</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 745</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/ucla_law_review_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:2 (December, 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/ucla_law_review_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/ucla_law_review_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/01/ucla-law-review-issue-552-december-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:2 (December 2007).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Alejandro E. Camacho, Can Regulation Evolve?  Lessons From a Study in Maladaptive Management, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 293 (2007).</p>
<p>Susan P. Crawford, The Internet and the Project of Communications Law, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 359 (2007).</p>
<p>Renée McDonald Hutchins, Tied Up in Knotts?  GPS Technology and the Fourth Amendment, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 409 (2007).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Jordan Berman, Overworking the Presumption of Sanity: Clark’s Use of Mental Disease Evidence to Negate Mens Rea, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 467 (2007).</p>
<p>Ross Naughton, State Statutes Limiting the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine: Tools for Tribes to Reclaim Criminal Jurisdiction Stripped by Public Law 280?, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 489 (2007).</p>
<p>Kristen A. Williams, Employing Ex-Offenders: Shifting the Evaluation of Workplace Risks and Opportunities From Employers to Corrections, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2&#038;detail=1">55:2</a> (December 2007).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Alejandro E. Camacho, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2/1-1">Can Regulation Evolve?  Lessons From a Study in Maladaptive Management</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 293 (2007).</p>
<p>Susan P. Crawford, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2/1-2">The Internet and the Project of Communications Law</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 359 (2007).</p>
<p>Renée McDonald Hutchins, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2/1-3">Tied Up in <em>Knotts</em>?  GPS Technology and the Fourth Amendment</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 409 (2007).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Jordan Berman, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2/2-1">Overworking the Presumption of Sanity: <em>Clark</em>’s Use of Mental Disease Evidence to Negate Mens Rea</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 467 (2007).</p>
<p>Ross Naughton, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2/2-2">State Statutes Limiting the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine: Tools for Tribes to Reclaim Criminal Jurisdiction Stripped by Public Law 280?</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 489 (2007).</p>
<p>Kristen A. Williams, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2/2-3">Employing Ex-Offenders: Shifting the Evaluation of Workplace Risks and Opportunities From Employers to Corrections</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 521 (2007).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/ucla_law_review_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

