<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; UCLA Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/author/UCLA-Law-Review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 14:52:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review 57:1 (October)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/ucla-law-review-571-october.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/ucla-law-review-571-october.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 23:21:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Civil Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy (Electronic Surveillance)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Privacy (Law Enforcement)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 57, Issue 1 (October 2009)</p>
<p>
Articles
</p>



From Privacy To Liberty: The Fourth Amendment After Lawrence
Thomas P. Crocker
1


Who Can Sue Over Government Surveillance?
Scott Michelman
71


Leverage in the Board Room: The Unsung Influence of Private Lenders in Corporate Governance
Frederick Tung
115



<p>
Essay
</p>



After the Bailout: Regulating Systemic Moral Hazard
Karl S. Okamoto
183



<p>
Comments
</p>



Evaluating The Public Interest: Regulation Of Industrial Hemp Under The Controlled Substances Act
Christine A. Kolosov
237


Improving The Education Of California’s Juvenile Offenders: An Alternative To Consent Decrees
Stefanie Low
275


The Right to Control One’s Name
Julia Shear Kushner
313



<p>
Discourse
</p>



Getting the Framers Wrong: A Response to Professor Geoffrey Stone
Samuel Calhoun



The Perils of Religious Passion: A Response to Professor Samuel Calhoun
Geoffrey Stone




<p> 
Th UCLA Law Review is also pleased to announce the launch of a our new website.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/logo.jpg" alt="" width="550" height="70" /></p>
<p><strong>Volume 57, Issue 1 (October 2009)</strong></p>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
Articles<br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=777">From Privacy To Liberty: The Fourth Amendment After <em>Lawrence</em></a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Thomas P. Crocker</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">1</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=781">Who Can Sue Over Government Surveillance?</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Scott Michelman</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">71</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=783">Leverage in the Board Room: The Unsung Influence of Private Lenders in Corporate Governance</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">Frederick Tung</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">115</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
Essay<br />
</span></p>
<table style="width: 545px;height: 45px" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=785">After the Bailout: Regulating Systemic Moral Hazard</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Karl S. Okamoto</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">183</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
Comments<br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=790">Evaluating The Public Interest: Regulation Of Industrial Hemp Under The Controlled Substances Act</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Christine A. Kolosov</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">237</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=792">Improving The Education Of California’s Juvenile Offenders: An Alternative To Consent Decrees</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Stefanie Low</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">275</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=795">The Right to Control One’s Name</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Julia Shear Kushner</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom">313</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><span style="font-variant: small-caps;font-size: 14pt"><br />
Discourse<br />
</span></p>
<table border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=506">Getting the Framers Wrong: A Response to Professor Geoffrey Stone</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Samuel Calhoun</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom"></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 340px;font-family: georgia;font-variant: small-caps;padding-left: 20px;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 11pt"><a href="http://uclalawreview.org/?p=500">The Perils of Religious Passion: A Response to Professor Samuel Calhoun</a></td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 120px;font-family: georgia;text-align: right;font-style: italic;padding-top: 20px;font-size: 10pt;vertical-align: bottom">Geoffrey Stone</td>
<td style="border: 0pt none;width: 50px;text-align: right;font-family: georgia;font-size: 10pt;padding-top: 20px;vertical-align: bottom"></td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
Th UCLA Law Review is also pleased to announce the launch of a our <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org">new website</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/ucla-law-review-571-october.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review 56:6 (August 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/ucla-law-review-566-august-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/ucla-law-review-566-august-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 22:17:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Contract Law & Beyond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corporate Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Intellectual Property]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=19856</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 56, Issue 6 (August 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Overcoming Overdisclosure: Toward Tax Shelter Detection (pdf)
Joshua D. Blank</p>
<p>First Amendment Enforcement in Government Institutions and Programs (pdf)
Gia B. Lee</p>
<p>Ezra Pound’s Copyright Statute: Perpetual Rights and the Problem of Heirs (pdf)
Robert Spoo</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Nonwaiver Agreements After Federal Rule of Evidence 502: A Glance at Quick-Peek and Clawback Agreements (pdf)
Jessica Wang</p>
<p>Narrowing the Definition of “Dwelling” Under the Fair Housing Act (pdf)
Karen Wong</p>
<p>Addressing Youth Bias Crime (pdf)
Jordan Blair Woods</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/UCLA-logo.jpg" alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p><strong>Volume 56, Issue 6 (August 2009)</strong></p>
<p><em><strong>Articles</strong></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/6/1-1">Overcoming Overdisclosure: Toward Tax Shelter Detection</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/6.1-1.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
<em>Joshua D. Blank</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/6/1-2">First Amendment Enforcement in Government Institutions and Programs</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/6.1-2.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
<em>Gia B. Lee</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/6/1-3">Ezra Pound’s Copyright Statute: Perpetual Rights and the Problem of Heirs</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/6.1-3.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
<em>Robert Spoo</em></p>
<p><strong><em>Comments</em></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/6/2-1">Nonwaiver Agreements After Federal Rule of Evidence 502: A Glance at Quick-Peek and Clawback Agreements</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/6.2-1.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
<em>Jessica Wang</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/6/2-2">Narrowing the Definition of “Dwelling” Under the Fair Housing Act</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/6.2-2.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
<em>Karen Wong</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/6/2-3">Addressing Youth Bias Crime</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/6.2-3.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
<em>Jordan Blair Woods</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/ucla-law-review-566-august-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review 56:5 (June) — Symposium: The Right to Bear Arms after D.C. v. Heller</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/ucla-law-review-565-june-%e2%80%94-symposium-the-right-to-bear-arms-after-dc-v-heller.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/ucla-law-review-565-june-%e2%80%94-symposium-the-right-to-bear-arms-after-dc-v-heller.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 02:55:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=18009</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 56, Issue 5 (June 2009)</p>
<p>Symposium: The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms After D.C. v. Heller</p>
<p>Gun Control After Heller: Threats and Sideshows From a Social Welfare Perspective (pdf)
Philip J. Cook, Jens Ludwig, and Adam M. Samaha</p>
<p>Heller, New Originalism, and Law Office History: “Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss” (pdf)
Saul Cornell</p>
<p>Heller and the Triumph of Originalist Judicial Engagement: A Response to Judge Harvie Wilkinson (pdf)
Alan Gura</p>
<p>The Heller Paradox (pdf)
Dennis A. Henigan</p>
<p>A Modern Historiography of the Second Amendment (pdf)
Don B. Kates</p>
<p>The Myth of Big-Time Gun Trafficking and the Overinterpretation of Gun Tracing Data (pdf)
Gary Kleck and Shun-Yung Kevin Wang</p>
<p>Why The Second Amendment Has a Preamble: Original Public Meaning and the Political Culture of Written Constitutions in Revolutionary America (pdf)
David Thomas Konig</p>
<p>The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/UCLA-logo.jpg" alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>Volume 56, Issue 5 (June 2009)</p>
<p><strong>Symposium: The Second Amendment and the Right to Bear Arms After <em>D.C. v. Heller</em></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-1">Gun Control After Heller: Threats and Sideshows From a Social Welfare Perspective</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-1.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Philip J. Cook, Jens Ludwig, and Adam M. Samaha</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-2">Heller, New Originalism, and Law Office History: “Meet the New Boss, Same as the Old Boss”</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-2.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Saul Cornell</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-3">Heller and the Triumph of Originalist Judicial Engagement: A Response to Judge Harvie Wilkinson</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-3.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Alan Gura</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-4">The Heller Paradox</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-4.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Dennis A. Henigan</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-5">A Modern Historiography of the Second Amendment</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-5.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Don B. Kates</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-6">The Myth of Big-Time Gun Trafficking and the Overinterpretation of Gun Tracing Data</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-6.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Gary Kleck and Shun-Yung Kevin Wang</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-7">Why The Second Amendment Has a Preamble: Original Public Meaning and the Political Culture of Written Constitutions in Revolutionary America</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-7.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
David Thomas Konig</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-8">The Second Amendment, Heller, and Originalist Jurisprudence</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-8.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Nelson Lund</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-9">The Supreme Court and the Uses of History: District of Columbia v. Heller</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-9.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Joyce Lee Malcolm</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-10">Heller &amp; Originalism’s Dead Hand — In Theory and Practice</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-10.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Reva B. Siegel</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-11">Permissible Gun Regulations After Heller: Speculations About Method and Outcomes</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-11.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Mark Tushnet</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-12">Implementing the Right To Keep and Bear Arms for Self-Defense: An Analytical Framework and a Research Agenda</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-12.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Eugene Volokh</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-13">Heller&#8217;s Catch-22</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-13.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Adam Winkler</p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
<strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/5/1-14">The Right to Know: An Approach to Gun Licenses and Public Access to Government Records</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/5.1-14.pdf">pdf</a>)<br />
Kelsey M. Swanson</p>
<p><strong> </strong><br />
The UCLA Law Review would also like to present the <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/membership/">2009-2010 Masthead</a>, and welcome its new staff.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/ucla-law-review-565-june-%e2%80%94-symposium-the-right-to-bear-arms-after-dc-v-heller.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review 56:4 (April 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/ucla_law_review_11.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/ucla_law_review_11.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:11:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Family Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Forum]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Legal Theory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Teaching]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/04/ucla-law-review-564-april-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 56, Issue 4 (April 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>A Constitutional Birthright: The State, Parentage, and the Rights Of Newborn Persons (pdf)</p>
<p>James G. Dwyer</p>
<p>“Which Is To Be Master,” The Judiciary or the Legislature? When Statutory Directives Violate Separation Of Powers (pdf)</p>
<p>Linda D. Jellum</p>
<p>Normative Methods for Lawyers (pdf)</p>
<p>Joseph William Singer</p>
<p>Comment</p>
<p>Sex Outside of the Therapy Hour: Practical and Constitutional Limits on Therapist Sexual Misconduct Regulations (pdf)</p>
<p>S. Wesley Gorman</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>Volume 56, Issue 4 (April 2009)</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/4/1-1">A Constitutional Birthright: The State, Parentage, and the Rights Of Newborn Persons</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/4.1-1.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
<p>James G. Dwyer</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/4/1-2">“Which Is To Be Master,” The Judiciary or the Legislature? When Statutory Directives Violate Separation Of Powers</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/4.1-2.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
<p>Linda D. Jellum</p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/4/1-3">Normative Methods for Lawyers</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/4.1-3.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
<p>Joseph William Singer</p>
<p><strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/4/2-1">Sex Outside of the Therapy Hour: Practical and Constitutional Limits on Therapist Sexual Misconduct Regulations</a> (<a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/content/56/ext/pdf/4.2-1.pdf">pdf</a>)</p>
<p>S. Wesley Gorman</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/ucla_law_review_11.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/ucla_law_review_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/ucla_law_review_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Dec 2008 23:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Forum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/12/ucla-law-review-discourse.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>56 UCLA Law Review Discourse (December 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Stephen M. Bainbridge, Reflections on Twenty Years of Law Teaching, 56 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 13 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-discourse-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-discourse-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>56 UCLA Law Review Discourse <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/discourse/">(December 2008)</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Stephen M. Bainbridge, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/discourse/?view=56/1/1-1">Reflections on Twenty Years of Law Teaching</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 13</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/ucla_law_review_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 56:2 (December 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/ucla_law_review_8.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/ucla_law_review_8.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 19:06:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/12/ucla-law-review-issue-562-december-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 56:2 (December 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Jeffrey Kahn, International Travel and the Constitution, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 271 (2008).</p>
<p>Carol Sanger, Seeing and Believing: Mandatory Ultrasound and the Path to a Protected Choice, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 351 (2008).</p>
<p>William K. Sjostrom, Jr., The Birth of Rule 144A Equity Offerings, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 409 (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Dale Larson, Unconsciously Regarded as Disabled: Implicit Bias and the Regarded-As Prong of the Americans With Disabilities Act, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 451 (2008).</p>
<p>Jordan Blair Woods,  Taking the &#8220;Hate&#8221; Out of Hate Crimes: Applying Unfair Advantage Theory to Justify the Enhanced Punishment of Opportunistic Bias Crimes, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 489 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/2&#038;detail=1">56:2</a> (December 2008).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Jeffrey Kahn, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/2/1-1">International Travel and the Constitution</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 271</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Carol Sanger, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/2/1-2">Seeing and Believing: Mandatory Ultrasound and the Path to a Protected Choice</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 351</span> (2008).</p>
<p>William K. Sjostrom, Jr., <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/2/1-3">The Birth of Rule 144A Equity Offerings</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 409</span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Dale Larson, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/2/2-1">Unconsciously Regarded as Disabled: Implicit Bias and the Regarded-As Prong of the Americans With Disabilities Act</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 451</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Jordan Blair Woods, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/2/2-2"> Taking the &#8220;Hate&#8221; Out of Hate Crimes: Applying Unfair Advantage Theory to Justify the Enhanced Punishment of Opportunistic Bias Crimes</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 489</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/ucla_law_review_8.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 56:1 (October 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/ucla_law_review_9.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/ucla_law_review_9.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 05:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/ucla-law-review-issue-561-october-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 56:1 (October 2008).</p>
<p>Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture</p>
<p>Geoffrey R. Stone, The World of the Framers: A Christian Nation?, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 1  (2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Adam M. Gershowitz, The iPhone Meets the Fourth Amendment, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 27  (2008).</p>
<p>Marco J. Jimenez, The Value of a Promise: A Utilitarian Approach to Contract Law Remedies, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 59  (2008).</p>
<p>Sean B. Seymore, Heightened Enablement in the Unpredictable Arts, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 127  (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Erin J. Cox,  Freeing Exercise at Expression&#8217;s Expense: When RFRA Privileges the Religiously Motivated Speaker, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 169 (2008).</p>
<p>Adam I. Kaplan,  The Case for Comparative Fault in Compensating the Wrongfully Convicted, 56 UCLA L. Rev. 227 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1&#038;detail=1">56:1</a> (October 2008).</p>
<p><strong>Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture</strong></p>
<p>Geoffrey R. Stone, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1/1-1">The World of the Framers: A Christian Nation?</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 1 </span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Adam M. Gershowitz, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1/2-1">The iPhone Meets the Fourth Amendment</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 27 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Marco J. Jimenez, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1/2-2">The Value of a Promise: A Utilitarian Approach to Contract Law Remedies</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 59 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Sean B. Seymore, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1/2-3">Heightened Enablement in the Unpredictable Arts</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 127 </span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Erin J. Cox, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1/3-1"> Freeing Exercise at Expression&#8217;s Expense: When RFRA Privileges the Religiously Motivated Speaker</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 169</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Adam I. Kaplan, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=56/1/3-2"> The Case for Comparative Fault in Compensating the Wrongfully Convicted</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. 227</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/ucla_law_review_9.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:6 (August 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/ucla_law_review_6.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/ucla_law_review_6.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Sep 2008 21:23:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/09/ucla-law-review-issue-556-august-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:6 (August 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Ann E. Carlson,  Implementing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Caps: A Case Study of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1479  (2008).</p>
<p>Daniel A. Farber, The Place-Based Theory of Standing, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1505  (2008).</p>
<p>Sean B. Hecht, Climate Change and the Transformation of Risk: Insurance Matters, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1559  (2008).</p>
<p>Douglas A. Kysar &#038; Bernadette A. Meyler,  Like a Nation State, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1621  (2008).</p>
<p>Cass R. Sunstein,  The World vs. the United States and China? The Complex Climate Change Incentives of the Leading Greenhouse Gas Emitters, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1675  (2008).</p>
<p>Michael P. Vandenbergh, Jack Barkenbus &#038; Jonathan Gilligan,  Individual Carbon Emissions: The [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5&#038;detail=1">55:6</a> (August 2008).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Ann E. Carlson, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-1"> Implementing Greenhouse Gas Emissions Caps: A Case Study of the Los Angeles Department of Water and Power</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1479 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Daniel A. Farber, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-2">The Place-Based Theory of Standing</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1505 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Sean B. Hecht, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-3">Climate Change and the Transformation of Risk: Insurance Matters</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1559 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Douglas A. Kysar &#038; Bernadette A. Meyler, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-4"> Like a Nation State</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1621 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Cass R. Sunstein, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-5"> The World vs. the United States and China? The Complex Climate Change Incentives of the Leading Greenhouse Gas Emitters</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1675 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Michael P. Vandenbergh, Jack Barkenbus &#038; Jonathan Gilligan, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-6"> Individual Carbon Emissions: The Low-Hanging Fruit</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1701 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Michael Wara, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-7"> Measuring the Clean Development Mechanism&#8217;s Performance and Potential</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1759 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Jonathan B. Wiener, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-8"> Climate Change Policy and Policy Change in China</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1805 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Jonathan Zasloff, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/1-9"> The Judicial Carbon Tax: Reconstructing Public Nuisance and Climate Change</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1827 </span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Alina Ball, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/2-1"> An Imperative Redefinition of &#8220;Community&#8221;: Incorporating Reentry Lawyers to Increase the Efficacy of Community Economic Development Initiatives</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1883 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Maureen Carroll, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/2-2"> Educating Expelled Students After No Child Left Behind: Mending an Incentive Structure That Discourages Alternative Education and Reinstatment</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1909 </span> (2008).</p>
<p>Amy Riley Lucas, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/6/2-1"> Specialty License Plates: The First Amendment and the Intersection of Government Speech and Public Forum Doctrines</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1971 </span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/ucla_law_review_6.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review Discourse</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/ucla_law_review_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/ucla_law_review_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 01:00:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Forum]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/ucla-law-review-discourse-2.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>56 UCLA Law Review Discourse (October 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Gary Blasi, Lawyers, Clients, and the &#8220;Third Person in the Room&#8221;, 56 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 1 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-discourse-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-discourse-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>56 UCLA Law Review Discourse <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/discourse/">(October 2008)</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Gary Blasi, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/discourse/?view=56/1/1-1">Lawyers, Clients, and the &#8220;Third Person in the Room&#8221;</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">56 UCLA L. Rev. Discourse 1</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/ucla_law_review_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:5 (June 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/ucla_law_review_4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/ucla_law_review_4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 12 Jul 2008 00:52:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/ucla-law-review-issue-555-june-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:5 (June 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Michelle Wilde Anderson,  Cities Inside Out: Race, Poverty, and Exclusion at the Urban Fringe, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1095 (2008).</p>
<p>Jennifer Gordon &#038; R.A. Lenhardt, Rethinking Work and Citizenship, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1161 (2008).</p>
<p>Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr. &#038; Clint A. Carpenter, The Return of Seditious Libel, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1239 (2008).</p>
<p>Adam J. Levitin,  Priceless? The Economic Costs of Credit Card Merchant Restraints, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1321 (2008).</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Michael L. Kramer &#038; Michael N. Schmitt,  Lawyers on Horseback? Thoughts on Judge Advocates and Civil-Military Relations, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1407 (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Richard J. Hawkins,  Substantially Modifying the Visual Artists Rights Act: A Copyright Proposal for Interpreting the Act&#8217;s Prejudicial Modification Clause, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1437 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5&#038;detail=1">55:5</a> (June 2008).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Michelle Wilde Anderson, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5/1-1"> Cities Inside Out: Race, Poverty, and Exclusion at the Urban Fringe</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1095</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Jennifer Gordon &#038; R.A. Lenhardt, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5/1-2">Rethinking Work and Citizenship</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1161</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr. &#038; Clint A. Carpenter, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5/1-3">The Return of Seditious Libel</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1239</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Adam J. Levitin, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5/1-4"> Priceless? The Economic Costs of Credit Card Merchant Restraints</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1321</span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Essay</strong></p>
<p>Michael L. Kramer &#038; Michael N. Schmitt, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5/2-1"> Lawyers on Horseback? Thoughts on Judge Advocates and Civil-Military Relations</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1407</span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Richard J. Hawkins, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/5/3-1"> Substantially Modifying the Visual Artists Rights Act: A Copyright Proposal for Interpreting the Act&#8217;s Prejudicial Modification Clause</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1437</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/ucla_law_review_4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:4 (April 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/ucla_law_review_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/ucla_law_review_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 10:30:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/05/ucla-law-review-issue-554-april-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:4 (April 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Josh Bowers,  Contraindicated Drug Courts, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 783 (2008).</p>
<p>Noah Sachs, Beyond the Liability Wall: Strengthening Tort Remedies in International Environmental Law, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 837 (2008).</p>
<p>Joanna M. Shepherd, Tort Reforms&#8217; Winners and Losers: The Competing Effects of Care and Activity Levels, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 905 (2008).</p>
<p>John G. Sprankling,  Owning the Center of the Earth, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 979 (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Megan Roberts,  The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: Why Considering Individuals One at a Time Creates Untenable Situations for Students and Educators, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1041 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/4&#038;detail=1">55:4</a> (April 2008).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Josh Bowers, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/4/1-1"> Contraindicated Drug Courts</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 783</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Noah Sachs, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/4/1-2">Beyond the Liability Wall: Strengthening Tort Remedies in International Environmental Law</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 837</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Joanna M. Shepherd, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/4/1-3">Tort Reforms&#8217; Winners and Losers: The Competing Effects of Care and Activity Levels</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 905</span> (2008).</p>
<p>John G. Sprankling, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/4/1-4"> Owning the Center of the Earth</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 979</span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Megan Roberts, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/4/2-1"> The Individuals With Disabilities Education Act: Why Considering Individuals One at a Time Creates Untenable Situations for Students and Educators</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 1041</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/ucla_law_review_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:3 (February 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/ucla_law_review_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/ucla_law_review_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 23:35:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/04/ucla-law-review-issue-553-february-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:3 (February 2008).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Stephen M. Bainbridge, The Convergence of Good Faith and Oversight, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 559 (2008).</p>
<p>Kamal Ghali, No Slavery Except as a Punishment for Crime: The Punishment Clause and Sexual Slavery, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 607 (2008).</p>
<p>Caleb E. Mason, An Aesthetic Defense of the Nonprecedential Opinion: The Easy Cases Debate in the Wake of the 2007 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 643 (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Malinda Lee, Reorienting the Debate on Presidential Signing Statements: The Need for Transparency in the President&#8217;s Constitutional Objections, Reservations, and Assertions of Power, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 705 (2008).</p>
<p>Nancy Olson, Does Practice Make Perfect? An Examination of Congress&#8217;s Proposed District Court Patent Pilot Program, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 745 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/3&#038;detail=1">55:3</a> (February 2008).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Stephen M. Bainbridge, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/3/1-1">The Convergence of Good Faith and Oversight</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 559</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Kamal Ghali, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/3/1-2">No Slavery Except as a Punishment for Crime: The Punishment Clause and Sexual Slavery</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 607</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Caleb E. Mason, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/3/1-3">An Aesthetic Defense of the Nonprecedential Opinion: The Easy Cases Debate in the Wake of the 2007 Amendments to the Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 643</span> (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Malinda Lee, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/3/2-1">Reorienting the Debate on Presidential Signing Statements: The Need for Transparency in the President&#8217;s Constitutional Objections, Reservations, and Assertions of Power</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 705</span> (2008).</p>
<p>Nancy Olson, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/3/2-2">Does Practice Make Perfect? An Examination of Congress&#8217;s Proposed District Court Patent Pilot Program</a>, <span style="font-variant:small-caps">55 UCLA L. Rev. 745</span> (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/ucla_law_review_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:2 (December, 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/ucla_law_review_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/ucla_law_review_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Jan 2008 21:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/01/ucla-law-review-issue-552-december-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:2 (December 2007).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Alejandro E. Camacho, Can Regulation Evolve?  Lessons From a Study in Maladaptive Management, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 293 (2007).</p>
<p>Susan P. Crawford, The Internet and the Project of Communications Law, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 359 (2007).</p>
<p>Renée McDonald Hutchins, Tied Up in Knotts?  GPS Technology and the Fourth Amendment, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 409 (2007).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Jordan Berman, Overworking the Presumption of Sanity: Clark’s Use of Mental Disease Evidence to Negate Mens Rea, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 467 (2007).</p>
<p>Ross Naughton, State Statutes Limiting the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine: Tools for Tribes to Reclaim Criminal Jurisdiction Stripped by Public Law 280?, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 489 (2007).</p>
<p>Kristen A. Williams, Employing Ex-Offenders: Shifting the Evaluation of Workplace Risks and Opportunities From Employers to Corrections, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2&#038;detail=1">55:2</a> (December 2007).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Alejandro E. Camacho, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2/1-1">Can Regulation Evolve?  Lessons From a Study in Maladaptive Management</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 293 (2007).</p>
<p>Susan P. Crawford, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2/1-2">The Internet and the Project of Communications Law</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 359 (2007).</p>
<p>Renée McDonald Hutchins, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2/1-3">Tied Up in <em>Knotts</em>?  GPS Technology and the Fourth Amendment</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 409 (2007).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Jordan Berman, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2/2-1">Overworking the Presumption of Sanity: <em>Clark</em>’s Use of Mental Disease Evidence to Negate Mens Rea</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 467 (2007).</p>
<p>Ross Naughton, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2/2-2">State Statutes Limiting the Dual Sovereignty Doctrine: Tools for Tribes to Reclaim Criminal Jurisdiction Stripped by Public Law 280?</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 489 (2007).</p>
<p>Kristen A. Williams, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/2/2-3">Employing Ex-Offenders: Shifting the Evaluation of Workplace Risks and Opportunities From Employers to Corrections</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 521 (2007).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/01/ucla_law_review_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:1 (October 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/ucla_law_review.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/ucla_law_review.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Nov 2007 04:51:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>UCLA Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (UCLA)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/11/ucla-law-review-issue-551-october-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue 55:1 (October 2007).</p>
<p>Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture</p>
<p>William W. Fisher III, When Should We Permit Differential Pricing of Information?, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1 (2007).</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Jill E. Fisch, Does Analyst Independence Sell Investors Short?, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 39 (2007).</p>
<p>Kenneth L. Karst, The Liberties of Equal Citizens: Groups and the Due Process Clause, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 99 (2007).</p>
<p>Peter S. Menell &#038; David Nimmer, Legal Realism in Action: Indirect Copyright Liability’s Continuing Tort Framework and Sony’s De Facto Demise, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 143 (2007).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Richard J. Hawkins, Dysfunctional Equivalence: The New Approach to Defining “Postal Channels” Under the Hague Service Convention, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 205 (2007).</p>
<p>Vanessa A. Lavely, The Path to Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage: Reconciling the Inconsistencies Between Marriage and Adoption [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="UCLA-logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/UCLA-logo.jpg" width="500" height="100" /></p>
<p>UCLA Law Review, Issue <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/1">55:1</a> (October 2007).</p>
<p><strong>Melville B. Nimmer Memorial Lecture</strong></p>
<p>William W. Fisher III, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/1/1-1">When Should We Permit Differential Pricing of Information?</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 1 (2007).</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Jill E. Fisch, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/1/1-2">Does Analyst Independence Sell Investors Short?</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 39 (2007).</p>
<p>Kenneth L. Karst, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/1/1-3">The Liberties of Equal Citizens: Groups and the Due Process Clause,</a> 55 UCLA L. Rev. 99 (2007).</p>
<p>Peter S. Menell &#038; David Nimmer, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/1/1-4">Legal Realism in Action: Indirect Copyright Liability’s Continuing Tort Framework and Sony’s De Facto Demise</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 143 (2007).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Richard J. Hawkins, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/1/2-1">Dysfunctional Equivalence: The New Approach to Defining “Postal Channels” Under the Hague Service Convention</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 205 (2007).</p>
<p>Vanessa A. Lavely, <a href="http://www.uclalawreview.org/articles/?view=55/1/2-2">The Path to Recognition of Same-Sex Marriage: Reconciling the Inconsistencies Between Marriage and Adoption Cases</a>, 55 UCLA L. Rev. 247 (2007).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/ucla_law_review.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
