Because of the private nature of the jury room, it is unclear how often juror misconduct occurs. Except for the rare instance in which one individual juror is flagrantly out of line, it is unlikely that misconduct will surface after a verdict is reached. After all, if there is one problem juror (a racist, a manipulator, etc.) the other jurors probably won’t wait until a verdict is reached to complain to the judge.

However, as has been written about recently here and here, many jurors blog about their jury service. While accounts of deliberations in jury rooms have always been available in high profile cases (there is always at least one juror who wants to speak to the media and get his or her 15 [...]]]>

Because of the private nature of the jury room, it is unclear how often juror misconduct occurs. Except for the rare instance in which one individual juror is flagrantly out of line, it is unlikely that misconduct will surface after a verdict is reached. After all, if there is one problem juror (a racist, a manipulator, etc.) the other jurors probably won’t wait until a verdict is reached to complain to the judge.

However, as has been written about recently here and here, many jurors blog about their jury service. While accounts of deliberations in jury rooms have always been available in high profile cases (there is always at least one juror who wants to speak to the media and get his or her 15 minutes!), juror blogs give attorneys of convicted defendants a window into how the client was convicted—and more importantly, grounds upon which to appeal if any misconduct is found.

In a case discussed by Ann Reed at Deliberations , a convicted burglar appealed his conviction on the basis of juror misconduct. The source: a juror’s blog in which he referred to the defendant as “Donald the Duck” and admitted to intimidating and manipulating his fellow jurors. He wrote in his blog:

To convict, the vote must be unanimous – all twelve jurors must agree. By threatening to vote not guilty on count five, since he so strongly believed that Donald the Duck was guilty of count three, that he stole the computer, therefore how could he become in receipt of it, skinhead Brad threatened to torpedo two of the counts – three and five – in his quest for tyrannical jurisprudence.

I decided to shut him up. ‘We’re all bringing experiences to the table, and I’m making the count now. This is not a perfect process. Don’t let the perfect be the enemy of the good.’ Suddenly my wisdom bell was ringing like a church bell at a wedding. I said rather sternly, ‘Give me a “guilty” or “not guilty,” no commentary[.]‘ Around the room, I polled everyone individually. Each voted guilty on count five. I signed the jury forms then asked Bonnie, closest to the door, to buzz [t]he bailiff.”

In large part because of the blog posts, the California Court of Appeals vacated the defendant’s conviction. This decision came despite the overwhelming evidence of the defendant’s guilt, in which the Court of Appeals admitted that “the [defendant] does not challenge the sufficiency of the evidence of his convictions and thus we need not provide a detailed summary of the underlying facts of his offenses.”

Curious about how often jurors blog about their service, I did a google search and came across thousands of hits. Unsurprisingly, most of the blogs discussed the mundane. Many people blogged about the ordeal of sitting in the waiting room, the process of jury selection, and advice about how to avoid getting selected to sit on a jury(remember this?)

However, there is certainly evidence of juror misconduct hidden amongst the blogs. For example, this juror blogged this past April::

Today was the last day of jury duty. I served as foreman of the jury. By the end of the case I thoroughly disliked the defending attorney. He had abused, postured and bullied his way through the entire trial, and had treated the witnesses for the prosecution, who were solid citizens doing their jobs, with disrespect and contempt. I was concerned that his histrionics were going to affect some of the less sophisticated among the jury to the degree that it would be hard to reach a decision on matters that were more or less clear. Just prior to the closing statements I decided to see what effect I might be able to have on the outcome given the limited set of tools available to me…

Actually first and second offenses were as linked as Tweedle-Dum and Tweedle-Dee. When we went into the jury room I asked if there was anyone else in the room who liked to run meetings. I was told by three or more: “you’re the man.” I kept them to a vague approximation of Robert’s Rules of Order, paid special attention to the participation of an elderly woman of color who felt out of place among so many white men, and a quiet Hispanic man who had also been swayed by the theater of the defense. Within an hour we had a conviction on both counts, and on all of the sub clauses of the counts. At the end of it we all felt that we had done the right thing, which I think we did.

I have either rarely, or perhaps never attempted such a conscious manipulation of my presentation of self as an adult. The fact that nobody knew me was an asset.

This man had a personal dislike against the defense attorney and admits to “conscious manipulation” of his fellow jurors. The juror quoted above blogs at Livejournal and the only information he provides is his name (Robert) and his hometown (Los Angeles). Had the defense found this blog, surely there would be some basis for appeal. However, reading the blog does not give any information that allows us to ascertain what case the juror was involved with.

Of the jurors who blog, surely the vast majority don’t admit misconduct, as the juror did in the robbery case. In the rare cases in which blog entries indicate that there was potential misconduct (such as the juror who admitted to “conscious manipulaiton”), it is certainly the right and responsibility of defense attorneys to appeal the verdict. In fact, I believe that searching for blogs and internet postings of all jurors will soon be an automatic response to losing a case. It won’t be long before this practice is completely ordinary, if not a requirement of being a zealous advocate.

Separation of church and state questioned as universities in Michigan install footbaths for Muslim students

A federal judge finds that a California law that prohibits selling or renting violent video games to minors violates the First Amendment.

A legal battle begins as Disney seeks to stop Anaheim, CA from building affordable housing near Disneyland.

Mother arrested for allowing her 18-year old son and several other underage guests to drink beer at her birthday party.

A Georgia sex offender who has been out of prison since 2006 now faces life in prison for failing to register with state officials. The reason: he is homeless.

A new trend: judicial performance evaluations to rate judges.

Judge rules that men can be charged with a hate crime for murdering a gay man despite lack of evidence that they were motivated by hatred for gays.

Big firms are finding that pro bono work is so good for business that they increasing commitments, even paying non-profits for “priority access” to pro bono cases.

Hefty abusive-driver fees in Virginia [...]]]> The California state bar will begin to regulate unaccredited law schoools. Included amongst the regulations are the maintaining of records, payment of fees associated with oversight costs, and minimum library standards.

A Georgia sex offender who has been out of prison since 2006 now faces life in prison for failing to register with state officials. The reason: he is homeless.

A new trend: judicial performance evaluations to rate judges.

Judge rules that men can be charged with a hate crime for murdering a gay man despite lack of evidence that they were motivated by hatred for gays.

Big firms are finding that pro bono work is so good for business that they increasing commitments, even paying non-profits for “priority access” to pro bono cases.

Hefty abusive-driver fees in Virginia were declared unconstitutoinal by a county judge. The fees were found to iolate the guarantee of equal protection under the law because they apply only to state residents.

With over forty recognized Indian tribes in Oklahoma, a push is underway to add Indian law to the OK bar.

Some counties are going to great lengths to find jurors.

If it reaches the Court, District of Columbia v. Heller may determine the meaning of the Second Amendment.

One man’s journey to law school and then away from the law.

Instructors and students at Idaho Law School offer free legal representation to illegal aliens facing deportion. A former Idaho official claims that providing such aid is a felony.

The N.J. Supreme Court has ruled in favor of a homeowners association which sought to ban residents from displaying political signs on their property.

The Houston Chronicle discusses the perception that most lawyers make six figure salaries.

A permanent injunction was issued by a federal judge against the anti-illegal-immigration ordinances in Hazelton, PA.

Unless NY gets a stay from a permanent injunction issued by a judge, advertisements for lawyers featuring slogans such as “heavy hitters” and showing lawyers doing things unrelated to legal competence will be back on the airwaves.

Strike Tactic: A Union hires homeless people to picket. These “temporary workers” are paid $8 an hour.

A resort at Bryce Canyon in Utah has become its own town, and will now collect $300,000 in annual sales tax revenue from tourists.

Does due process apply in the NFL? With Michael Vick banned from training camp, should the NFL pass judgment before the legal system runs its course?

The Washington Post looks at the perks of being a summer associate.

California has created a new court to deal with prison overcrowding.

Defense attorneys in civil rights case lost a motion to prevent the plaintiff from mentioning President’s Bush name. The case involves a man arrested for displaying an anti-war sign at a Bush campaign event. The defense argued that Bush’s low approval ratings could prejudice the jury.

Backlogs in crime labs are leading to problems in many states, including the occasional miscarriage of justice.

Hong Kong’s Court of Final Appeals has ruled an anti-sodomy law unconstitutional.

It’s been ten years since the blog was born. Prominent people from journalism, business, entertainment, and more discuss what blogs mean to them.

The NY attorney general is threatening legal action against a health insurance company which is planning to rank doctors by quality of care and cost.

How much does it cost to name a law school?

A bond between Orthodox Jews and Pentecostal Christians over discrimination based on religious dress requirements.

How not to get out of jury duty.

A NY Times op-ed discusses a way of getting around the Court’s school segregation ruling.

An online company that broadcasts cockfights has filed a First Amendment challenge against a federal law that bans depictions of animal cruelty.

The University of Florida has been sued by a Christian fraternity for not allowing it to be recognized as a student organization.

A Massachusetts man is suing the Mass. bar over a question about gay marriage after he refused to answer the question and failed the exam.

The NY Times discusses Justice Thomas’ opposition to integration and affirmative action.

What responsibility do law firms have to fix the criminal justice system in New Orleans?

The Supreme Court’s term: a (conservative) activist Court?

The AP investigates the often terrible conditions in private, for-profit prisons.

Where are the Supreme Court justices this summer?

A lawyer is suing the state of Washingon over its ban of online poker, citing commerce clause violations.

Violations of underage drinking laws are not treated equally.

A Washington Post editorial discusses whether legal gay marriage in Massachusetts has had an effect on the institution of marriage.

Today, many papers ran editorials discussing the rightward shift of the Court this past term. Here is the San Francisco Chronicle’s take.

More than 15 law schools have added gambling law courses to their curriculum.

David Holmberg, a journalist and adjunct professor, talks about receiving teaching evaluations from his students.

A quirky law in Boston will require the city to have a primary election for city council in September to narrow 9 candidates down to 8. The cost: $500,000.

In Chicago, a woman with Holt-Oram Syndrome (undeveloped hands) filed a lawsuit against McDonalds. She claims that the restaurant refused to serve her when she passed the credit card to the employee with her feet.

Jeffrey Rosen asks whether last week’s segregation case will have the same societal altering impact as Brown did in [...]]]> A few times a week, I will post links that may be of interest to our readers.

More than 15 law schools have added gambling law courses to their curriculum.

David Holmberg, a journalist and adjunct professor, talks about receiving teaching evaluations from his students.

A quirky law in Boston will require the city to have a primary election for city council in September to narrow 9 candidates down to 8. The cost: $500,000.

In Chicago, a woman with Holt-Oram Syndrome (undeveloped hands) filed a lawsuit against McDonalds. She claims that the restaurant refused to serve her when she passed the credit card to the employee with her feet.

Jeffrey Rosen asks whether last week’s segregation case will have the same societal altering impact as Brown did in the 1960′s.

Linda Greenhouse summarizes the Supreme Court’s term and its rightward shift.

A new Tennesse law requires everyone to show ID when buying beer.

Barry Schwartz attacks New York City’s cash incentive plan to students, questioning whether monetary motivations will supercede the intrinsic motivations to do well in school.

A new law in Maine will pay college graduates (in the form of tax credits for college loans) to stay in the state.