<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Notre Dame Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/author/Notre-Dame-Law-Review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 84, Issue 1 (November 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/notre_dame_law_4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/notre_dame_law_4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 05:01:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notre Dame Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Notre Dame)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/12/notre-dame-law-review-volume-84-issue-1-november-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 84, Issue 1 (November 2008)</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>Climate Change Confusion and the Supreme Court: The Misguided Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean Air Act</p>
<p>Jason Scott Johnston, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1</p>
<p>Corporate Misconduct and the Perfect Storm of Shareholder Litigation</p>
<p>Jessica Erickson, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 75</p>
<p>Why Protect Private Arms Possession? Nine Theories of the Second Amendment</p>
<p>Michael Steven Green, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 131</p>
<p>The Fundamental Goal of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers, Not Increasing Efficiency</p>
<p>John B. Kirkwood &#038; Robert H. Lande, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 191</p>
<p>What is the Erie Doctrine (And What Does it Mean for the Contemporary Politics of Judicial Federalism?)</p>
<p>Adam N. Steinman, 84 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 245</p>
<p>Opting Out of the Internet in the United States and the European [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg" width="450" height="125" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/84ndlr1/84_1_TOC.pdf">Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 84, Issue 1 (November 2008)</a></p>
<p><center><strong>ARTICLES</strong></center></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/84ndlr1/Johnston.pdf">Climate Change Confusion and the Supreme Court: The Misguided Regulation of Greenhouse Gas Emissions Under the Clean Air Act</a></p>
<p><em>Jason Scott Johnston</em>, 84 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/84ndlr1/Erickson.pdf">Corporate Misconduct and the Perfect Storm of Shareholder Litigation</a></p>
<p><em>Jessica Erickson</em>, 84 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 75</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/84ndlr1/Green.pdf">Why Protect Private Arms Possession? Nine Theories of the Second Amendment</a></p>
<p><em>Michael Steven Green</em>, 84 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 131</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/84ndlr1/Kirkwood_Lande.pdf">The Fundamental Goal of Antitrust: Protecting Consumers, Not Increasing Efficiency</a></p>
<p><em>John B. Kirkwood</em> &#038; <em>Robert H. Lande</em>, 84 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 191</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/84ndlr1/Steinman.pdf">What is the <em>Erie</em> Doctrine (And What Does it Mean for the Contemporary Politics of Judicial Federalism?)</a></p>
<p><em>Adam N. Steinman</em>, 84 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 245</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/84ndlr1/Travis.pdf">Opting Out of the Internet in the United States and the European Union: Copyright, Safe Harbors, and International Law</a></p>
<p><em>Hannibal Travis</em>, 84 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 331</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/84ndlr1/Williams.pdf">The Foundations of the American Common Market</a></p>
<p><em>Norman R. Williams</em>, 84 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 409</p>
<p><center><strong>NOTE</strong></center></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/84ndlr1/Ward.pdf">The Root of All Evil: Expanding Criminal Liability for Providing Material Support to Terror</a></p>
<p><em>James J. Ward</em>, 84 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 471</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/notre_dame_law_4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 5 (July 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/notre_dame_law_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/notre_dame_law_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notre Dame Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Notre Dame)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/12/notre-dame-law-review-volume-83-issue-5-july-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 5 (July 2008)</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>The Original Meaning of an Omission: The Tenth Amendment, Popular Sovereignty, and &#8220;Expressly&#8221; Delegated Power</p>
<p>Kurt T. Lash, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1889</p>
<p>Rules of Weight</p>
<p>Charles L. Barzun, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1957</p>
<p>Liars and Terrorists and Judges, Oh My: Moral Panic and the Symbolic Politics of Appellate Review in Asylum Cases</p>
<p>Eric M. Fink, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2019</p>
<p>Doctrine Formulation and Distrust</p>
<p>Toby J. Heytens, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2045</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>Giving HIPAA Enforcement Room to Grow: Why There Should Not (Yet) Be a Private Cause of Action</p>
<p>Jack Brill, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 2105</p>
<p>Not So Fast! Scrutinizing the &#8220;Gun Jumping&#8221; Provisions of the Securities Act Under the Commercial Speech Doctrine</p>
<p>Edward T. Highberger, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg" width="450" height="125" /></p>
<p>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 5 (July 2008)</p>
<p><center><strong>ARTICLES</strong></center></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr5/Lash.pdf">The Original Meaning of an Omission: The Tenth Amendment, Popular Sovereignty, and &#8220;Expressly&#8221; Delegated Power</a></p>
<p><em>Kurt T. Lash</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1889</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr5/Barzun.pdf">Rules of Weight</a></p>
<p><em>Charles L. Barzun</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1957</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr5/Fink.pdf">Liars and Terrorists and Judges, Oh My: Moral Panic and the Symbolic Politics of Appellate Review in Asylum Cases</a></p>
<p><em>Eric M. Fink</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 2019</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr5/Heytens.pdf">Doctrine Formulation and Distrust</a></p>
<p><em>Toby J. Heytens</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 2045</p>
<p><center><strong>NOTES</strong></center></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr5/Brill.pdf">Giving HIPAA Enforcement Room to Grow: Why There Should Not (Yet) Be a Private Cause of Action</a></p>
<p><em>Jack Brill</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 2105</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr5/Highberger.pdf">Not So Fast! Scrutinizing the &#8220;Gun Jumping&#8221; Provisions of the Securities Act Under the Commercial Speech Doctrine</a></p>
<p><em>Edward T. Highberger</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 2141</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr5/Hines.pdf">Fulfilling the Promise of <em>Brown</em>? What <em>Parents Involved</em> Means for Louisville and the Future of Race in Public Education</a></p>
<p><em>Meaghan Hines</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 2173</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr5/Zouhary.pdf">The Elephant in the Classroom: A Proposed Framework for Applying Viewpoint Neutrality to Student Speech in the Secondary School Setting</a></p>
<p><em>Alexis Zouhary</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 2227</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/notre_dame_law_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 4 (May 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/notre_dame_law_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/notre_dame_law_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 04:05:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notre Dame Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Notre Dame)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/12/notre-dame-law-review-volume-83-issue-4-may-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 4 (May 2008)</p>
<p>FEDERAL COURTS, PRACTICE, &#038; PROCEDURE</p>
<p>SYMPOSIUM: SEPARATION OF POWERS AS A SAFEGUARD OF FEDERALISM</p>
<p>Forward: The Importance of Structure in Constitutional Interpretation</p>
<p>Antonin Scalia, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1417</p>
<p>Constitutional Compromise and the Supremacy Clause</p>
<p>Bradford R. Clark, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1421</p>
<p>Vetogates, 	Chevron, Preemption</p>
<p>William N. Eskridge, Jr., 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1441</p>
<p>Framework Legislation and Federalism</p>
<p>Elizabeth Garrett, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1495</p>
<p>Lessons from a Nondelegation Canon</p>
<p>John F. Manning, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1541</p>
<p>The Perils of Theory</p>
<p>Peter L. Strauss, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1567</p>
<p>The Separation of Powers as a Safeguard of Nationalism</p>
<p>Carlos Manuel Vazquez, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1601</p>
<p>Preemption of Federal Common Law</p>
<p>Ernest A. Young, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1639</p>
<p>The Procedural Safeguards of Federalism</p>
<p>Bradford [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg" width="450" height="125" /></p>
<p>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 4 (May 2008)</p>
<p><center><strong>FEDERAL COURTS, PRACTICE, &#038; PROCEDURE</strong></center></p>
<p><center><strong>SYMPOSIUM: SEPARATION OF POWERS AS A SAFEGUARD OF FEDERALISM</strong></center></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Scalia.pdf">Forward: The Importance of Structure in Constitutional Interpretation</a></p>
<p><em>Antonin Scalia</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1417</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Clark1.pdf">Constitutional Compromise and the Supremacy Clause</a></p>
<p><em>Bradford R. Clark</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1421</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Eskridge.pdf">Vetogates, 	<em>Chevron</em>, Preemption</a></p>
<p><em>William N. Eskridge, Jr.</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1441</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Garrett.pdf">Framework Legislation and Federalism</a></p>
<p><em>Elizabeth Garrett</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1495</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Manning.pdf">Lessons from a Nondelegation Canon</a></p>
<p><em>John F. Manning</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1541</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Strauss.pdf">The Perils of Theory</a></p>
<p><em>Peter L. Strauss</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1567</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Vazquez.pdf">The Separation of Powers as a Safeguard of Nationalism</a></p>
<p><em>Carlos Manuel Vazquez</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1601</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Young.pdf">Preemption of Federal Common Law</a></p>
<p><em>Ernest A. Young</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1639</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Clark2.pdf">The Procedural Safeguards of Federalism</a></p>
<p><em>Bradford R. Clark</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1681</p>
<p><center><strong>NOTES</strong></center></p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Baworowsky.pdf">From Public Square to Market Square: Theoretical Foundations of First and Fourteenth Amendment Protection of Corporate Religious Speech</a></p>
<p><em>Julie Marie Baworowsky</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1713</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Follas.pdf">&#8220;It Belongs in a Museum&#8221;: Appropriate Donor Incentives for Fractional Gifts of Art</a></p>
<p><em>Emily J. Follas</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1779</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Hannon.pdf">Much Ado About <em>Twombly</em>? A Study on the Impact of <em>Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly</em> on 12(b)(6) Motions</a></p>
<p><em>Kendall W. Hannon</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1811</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_public/83ndlr4/Ladwein.pdf">Discerning the Meaning of <em>Gonzales v. Carhart</em>: The End of the Physician Veto and the Resulting Change in Abortion Jurisprudence</a></p>
<p><em>Peter M. Ladwein</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1847</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/notre_dame_law_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 3 (May 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/notre_dame_law_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/notre_dame_law_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 04:12:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notre Dame Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Notre Dame)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/notre-dame-law-review-volume-83-issue-3-may-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 3 (May 2008)</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>Standing at the Crossroads: The Roberts Court in Historical Perspective</p>
<p>Maxwell L. Stearns, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 875</p>
<p>The Culpability of Felony Murder</p>
<p>Guyora Binder, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 965</p>
<p>Three Faces of Deference</p>
<p>Paul Horwitz, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1061</p>
<p>SYMPOSIUM</p>
<p>STARE DECISIS AND NONJUDICIAL ACTORS</p>
<p>Introduction</p>
<p>Amy Coney Barrett, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1147</p>
<p>Stare Decisis and the Constitution: Four Questions and Answers</p>
<p>Thomas Healy, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1173</p>
<p>Lincoln and Judicial Authority</p>
<p>Michael Stokes Paulsen, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1227</p>
<p>Polyphonic Stare Decisis: Listening to Non-Article III Actors</p>
<p>Kermit Roosevelt III, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1303</p>
<p>Legislative and Executive Stare Decisis</p>
<p>Mark Tushnet, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1339</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>A Comparative Analysis of the Origins and Structure of Public Health Financing for HIV [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg" width="450" height="125" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ndlawreview.org/current/index.php">Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 3 (May 2008)</a></p>
<p><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><strong>Standing at the Crossroads: The Roberts Court in Historical Perspective</strong></p>
<p><em>Maxwell L. Stearns</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 875</p>
<p><strong>The Culpability of Felony Murder</strong></p>
<p><em>Guyora Binder</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 965</p>
<p><strong>Three Faces of Deference</strong></p>
<p><em>Paul Horwitz</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1061</p>
<p><strong>SYMPOSIUM</strong></p>
<p><strong>STARE DECISIS AND NONJUDICIAL ACTORS</strong></p>
<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p><em>Amy Coney Barrett</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1147</p>
<p><strong>Stare Decisis and the Constitution: Four Questions and Answers</strong></p>
<p><em>Thomas Healy</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1173</p>
<p><strong>Lincoln and Judicial Authority</strong></p>
<p><em>Michael Stokes Paulsen</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1227</p>
<p><strong>Polyphonic Stare Decisis: Listening to Non-Article III Actors</strong></p>
<p><em>Kermit Roosevelt III</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1303</p>
<p><strong>Legislative and Executive Stare Decisis</strong></p>
<p><em>Mark Tushnet</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1339</p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p><strong>A Comparative Analysis of the Origins and Structure of Public Health Financing for HIV Care in the United States and England</strong></p>
<p><em>Steven R. Keener</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1357</p>
<p><strong>Damages and Damocles: The Propriety of Recoupment Orders as Remedies for Violations of the Establishment Clause</strong></p>
<p><em>David T. Raimer</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1385</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/notre_dame_law_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 2 (January 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/notre_dame_law.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/notre_dame_law.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 02:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notre Dame Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Notre Dame)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/04/notre-dame-law-review-volume-83-issue-2-january-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 2 (January 2008)</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>A Truism WIth Attitudes: The Tenth Amendment in Constitutional Context</p>
<p>Gary Lawson, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 469</p>
<p>Arbitrating Human Rights</p>
<p>Roger P. Alford, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 505</p>
<p>Misguided Fairness? Regulating Arbitration by Statute: Empirical Evidence of Declining Award Finality</p>
<p>Michael H. LeRoy, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 551</p>
<p>Debt and Democracy: Towards a Constitutional Theory of Bankruptcy</p>
<p>Jonathan C. Lipson, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 605</p>
<p>Performance Values</p>
<p>Sara K. Stadler, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 697</p>
<p>ESSAY</p>
<p>Locating Authority in Law, and Avoiding the Authoritarianism of &#8220;Textualism&#8221;</p>
<p>Patrick McKinley Brennan, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 761</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>A Textual Approach to Harmonizing Sherbert and Smith on Free Exercise</p>
<p>Nicholas J. Nelson, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 801</p>
<p>Your Opinion Really Does Not Matter: How the Use Referenda in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg" width="450" height="125" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ndlawreview.org/archive/issue.php?vol=83&#038;num=2">Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 2 (January 2008)</a></p>
<p><strong>A<small>RTICLES</small></strong></p>
<p><strong>A Truism WIth Attitudes: The Tenth Amendment in Constitutional Context</strong></p>
<p><em>Gary Lawson</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 469</p>
<p><strong>Arbitrating Human Rights</strong></p>
<p><em>Roger P. Alford</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 505</p>
<p><strong>Misguided Fairness? Regulating Arbitration by Statute: Empirical Evidence of Declining Award Finality</strong></p>
<p><em>Michael H. LeRoy</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 551</p>
<p><strong>Debt and Democracy: Towards a Constitutional Theory of Bankruptcy</strong></p>
<p><em>Jonathan C. Lipson</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 605</p>
<p><strong>Performance Values</strong></p>
<p><em>Sara K. Stadler</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 697</p>
<p><strong>E<small>SSAY</small></strong></p>
<p><strong>Locating Authority in Law, and Avoiding the Authoritarianism of &#8220;Textualism&#8221;</strong></p>
<p><em>Patrick McKinley Brennan</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 761</p>
<p><strong>N<small>OTES</small></strong></p>
<p><strong>A Textual Approach to Harmonizing Sherbert and Smith on Free Exercise</strong></p>
<p><em>Nicholas J. Nelson</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 801</p>
<p><strong>Your Opinion Really Does Not Matter: How the Use Referenda in Funding Public University Student Groups Violates Constitutional Free Speech Principles</strong></p>
<p><em>Gregory B. Sanford</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 845</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/notre_dame_law.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 1 (November 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/notre_dame_law_review_volume_83_issue_1_november_2007.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/notre_dame_law_review_volume_83_issue_1_november_2007.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Mar 2008 01:24:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Notre Dame Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Notre Dame)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/notre-dame-law-review-volume-83-issue-1-november-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 1 (November 2007)</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>&#8220;Necessary to the Security of a Free State&#8221;</p>
<p>Eugene Volokh, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 1</p>
<p>Created Facts and the Flawed Ontology of Copyright Law</p>
<p>Justin Hughes, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 43</p>
<p>Reclaiming McDonnell Douglas</p>
<p>Martin J. Katz, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 109</p>
<p>The Jurisprudence of Colliding First Amendment Interests: From the Dead End of Neutrality to the Open Road of Participation-Enhancing Review</p>
<p>Gregory P. Magarian, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 185</p>
<p>The Commandeerer in Chief</p>
<p>Jason Mazzone, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 265</p>
<p>Contract as Agreement</p>
<p>Lawrence M. Solan, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 353</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>Can Separate Be Equal? Single-Sex Classrooms, the Constitution, and Title IX</p>
<p>Benjamin P. Carr, 83 NOTRE DAME L. REV. 409</p>
<p>Crusading For the Helpless or Biting the Hand That Feeds?  Applying [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Notre-Dame-Logo.jpg" width="450" height="125" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.ndlawreview.org/archive/issue.php?vol=83&#038;num=1">Notre Dame Law Review, Volume 83, Issue 1 (November 2007)</a></p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_abstracts/83ndlr1/volokh.pdf">&#8220;Necessary to the Security of a Free State&#8221;</a></p>
<p><em>Eugene Volokh</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 1</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_abstracts/83ndlr1/hughes.pdf">Created Facts and the Flawed Ontology of Copyright Law</a></p>
<p><em>Justin Hughes</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 43</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_abstracts/83ndlr1/katz.pdf">Reclaiming McDonnell Douglas</a></p>
<p><em>Martin J. Katz</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 109</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_abstracts/83ndlr1/magarian.pdf">The Jurisprudence of Colliding First Amendment Interests: From the Dead End of Neutrality to the Open Road of Participation-Enhancing Review</a></p>
<p><em>Gregory P. Magarian</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 185</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_abstracts/83ndlr1/mazzone.pdf">The Commandeerer in Chief</a></p>
<p><em>Jason Mazzone</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 265</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nd.edu/~ndlrev/archive_abstracts/83ndlr1/solan.pdf">Contract as Agreement</a></p>
<p><em>Lawrence M. Solan</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 353</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p><strong>Can Separate Be Equal? Single-Sex Classrooms, the Constitution, and Title IX</strong></p>
<p><em>Benjamin P. Carr</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 409</p>
<p><strong>Crusading For the Helpless or Biting the Hand That Feeds?  Applying Landlord-Tenant Law to Residents in Shelters</strong></p>
<p><em>Matthew R. Hays</em>, 83 N<small>OTRE</small> D<small>AME</small> L. R<small>EV</small>. 443</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/notre_dame_law_review_volume_83_issue_1_november_2007.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

