Site Meter

Author: Minnesota Law Review

0

Minnesota Law Review 96:3 (February 2012)

minnesota-logo2

Volume 96, Issue 3 (February 2012):

Articles

Jeremy N. Sheff, Veblen Brands, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 769 (2012)

Talia Fisher, Conviction Without Conviction, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 833 (2012)

Jason Marisam, The Interagency Marketplace, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 886 (2012)

Samuel R. Wiseman, Waiving Innocence, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 952 (2012)

Afra Afsharipour, A Shareholders’ Put Option: Counteracting the Acquirer Overpayment Problem, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 1018 (2012)

Notes

Adam J. Hoskins, Armchair Jury Consultants: The Legal Implications and Benefits of Online Research of Prospective Jurors in the Facebook Era, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 1100 (2012)

Brian Jacobson, Making Pesticides Public: A Disclosure-Based Approach to Regulating Pesticide Use, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 1123 (2012)

Kevin Lampone, Class Certification as a Prerequisite for CAFA Jurisdiction, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 1151 (2012)

0

Minnesota Law Review 96:1 (November 2011)

minnesota-logo2

Volume 96, Issue 1 (November 2011):

Essay

Catharine A. MacKinnon, Substantive Equality: A Perspective, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 1 (2011)

Articles

Frank B. Cross, Tort Law and the American Economy, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 28 (2011)

Tsilly Dagan and Talia Fisher, Rights for Sale, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 90 (2011)

Kimberly Kessler Ferzan, Beyond Crime and Commitment: Justifying Liberty Deprivations of the Dangerous and Responsible, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 141 (2011)

Neomi Rao, Public Choice and International Law Compliance: The Executive Branch Is a “They,” Not an “It”, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 194 (2011)

Notes

Daniel J. Iden, Combating Joint Ventures in Suppression: Taking Inventory of the Legal Arsenal, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 278 (2011)

Mark Thomson, Who Are They to Judge?: The Constitutionality of Delegations by Courts to Probation Officers, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 306 (2011)

Margaret E. Wade, The Sartorial Dilemma of Knockoffs: Protecting Moral Rights without Disturbing the Fashion Dynamic, 96 Minn. L. Rev. 336 (2011)

0

Minnesota Law Review 95:5 (May 2011)

minnesota-logo2

Volume 95, Issue 5 (May 2011):

Articles

Nicole Elsasser Watson, Government Ethics and Bailouts: The Past, Present, and Future, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1525 (2011)

Jeffrey M. Lipshaw , The Financial Crisis of 2008-2009: Capitalism Didn’t Fail, but the Metaphors Got a “C” , 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1532 (2011)

Jonathan G. Katz , Who Benefited from the Bailout?, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1568 (2011)

Kathleen Clark, Fiduciary-Based Standards for Bailout Contractors: What the Treasury Got Right and Wrong in TARP, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1614 (2011)

Claire Hill and Richard Painter, Compromised Fiduciaries: Conflicts of Interest in Government and Business, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1637 (2011)

Lisa M. Fairfax, Government Governance and the Need to Reconcile Government Regulation with Board Fiduciary Duties, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1692 (2011)

Steven M. Davidoff, Uncomfortable Embrace: Federal Corporate Ownership in the Midst of the Financial Crisis, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1733 (2011)

Stephen M. Bainbridge, Dodd-Frank: Quack Federal Corporate Governance Round II, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1779 (2011)

Usha Rodrigues, Corporate Governance in an Age of Separation of Ownership from Ownership, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1822 (2011)

Notes

Elsa Bullard, Insufficient Government Protection: The Inescapable Element in Domestic Violence Asylum Cases, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1867 (2011)

Jamie L. Kastler, The Problem with Waste: Delaware’s Lenient Treatment of Waste Claims at the Demand Stage of Derivative Litigation, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1899 (2011)

Christopher A. Pinahs, Diversity Jurisdiction and Injunctive Relief: Using “Moving-Party Approach” to Value the Amount in Controversy, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1930 (2011)

0

Minnesota Law Review 95:4 (April 2011)

minnesota-logo2

Volume 95, Issue 4 (April 2011):

Articles

Michael Steven Green, Erie’s Suppressed Premise, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1111 (2011)

Allan Erbsen, Constitutional Spaces, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1168 (2011)

Maya Steinitz, Whose Claim Is This Anyway? Third-Party Litigation Funding, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1268 (2011)

David Weissbrodt and Nathaniel H. Nesbitt, The Role of the United States Supreme Court in Interpreting and Developing Humanitarian Law, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1339 (2011)

Notes

Justin Goetz, Hold Fast the Keys to the Kingdom: Federal Administrative Agency and the Need for Brady Disclosure, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1424(2011)

Karen E. Nelson, Turning Winners into Losers: Ponzi Scheme Avoidance Law and the Inequity of Clawbacks, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1456 (2011)

Monica Patel, Expanding the Role of Trade Preference Programs, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1490 (2011)

1

Minnesota Law Review 95:3 (February 2011)

minnesota-logo2

Volume 95, Issue 3 (February 2011):

Articles

Michael P. Vandenbergh, Amanda R. Carrico, and Lisa Schultz Bressman, Regulation in the Behavioral Era, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 715 (2011)

Margaret H. Lemos, Special Incentives to Sue, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 782 (2011)

Randall S. Thomas and Harwell Wells, Executive Compensation in the Courts: Board Capture, Optimal Contracting, and Officers’ Fiduciary Duties, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 846 (2011)

Sarah B. Lawsky, On the Edge: Declining Marginal Utility and Tax Policy, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 904 (2011)

Deborah Hellman, Money Talks but It Isn’t Speech, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 953 (2011)

Notes

Heather R. Abraham, Legitimate Absenteeism: The Unconstitutionality of the Caucus Attendance Requirement, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1003 (2011)

Reed T. Schuster, Rule 14a-11 and the Administrative Procedure Act: It’s Better to Have Had and Waived, than Never to Have Had at All, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1034 (2011)

Tyler J. Siewert, The Cloying Use of Unallotment: Curbing Executive Branch Appropriation Reductions During Fiscal Emergencies, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1071 (2011)

0

Minnesota Law Review 95:2 (December 2010)

minnesota-logo2

Volume 95, Issue 2 (December 2010):

Articles

Josh Chafetz, Impeachment and Assassination, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 347 (2010)

J.B. Ruhl and Robert L. Fischman, Adaptive Management in the Courts, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 424 (2010)

I. Glenn Cohen and Daniel L. Chen, Trading-Off Reproductive Technology and Adoption: Does Subsidizing IVF Decrease Adoption Rates and Should it Matter?, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 485 (2010)

Robert B. Ahdieh, The Visible Hand: Coordination Functions of the Regulatory State, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 578 (2010)

Notes

Laura N. Arneson, Defining Unpatented Article: Why Labeling Products with Expired Patent Numbers Should Not Be False Marketing, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 650 (2010)

Trevor Woodage, Relative Futility: Limits to Genetic Privacy Protection Because of the Inability to Prevent Disclosure of Genetic Information by Relatives, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 682 (2010)

0

minnesota-logo2

Volume 95, Issue 1 (November 2010):

Lecture

Hon. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, The Role of Dissenting Opinions, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 1 (2010)

Articles

Margaret H. Lemos and Alex Stein, Strategic Enforcement, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 9 (2010)

Hon. Richard D. Cudahy and Alan Devlin, Anticompetitive Effect, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 59 (2010)

Jeffrey A. Meyer, Dual Illegality and Geoambiguous Law: A New Rule for Extraterritorial Application of U.S. Law, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 110 (2010)

David Zaring, Administration by Treasury, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 187 (2010)

Notes

Nathaniel H. Nesbitt, Meeting Boumediene‘s Challenge: The Emergence of an Effective Habeas Jurisprudence and Obsolescence of New Detention Legislation, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 244 (2010)

Steven Schmidt, The Need for Review: Allowing Defendants to Appeal the Factual Basis of a Conviction After Pleading Guilty, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 284 (2010)

Eva B. Stensvad, Immunity for Vaccine Manufacturers: The Vaccine Act and Preemption of Design Defect Claims, 95 Minn. L. Rev. 315 (2010)

0

Minnesota Law Review Headnotes 94:2 (May 2010)

headnotes-logo1

The Minnesota Law Review is proud to announce the spring edition of our new online companion journal, Minnesota Law Review Headnotes. In addition to serving as the online archive of the Law Review‘s print articles, available in PDF format, Headnotes also features original, online-only Response articles in which prominent academics respond to the articles the Law Review publishes. Comment fields are available at the end of each Response, and readers are encouraged to provide feedback.

In this issue of Headnotes:

Ralph Hall (University of Minnesota Law School) responds to Richard Epstein’s article, Against Permititis: Why Voluntary Organizations Should Regulate the Use of Cancer Drugs. In Right Question, Wrong Answer, Professor Hall argues that while he agrees with Professor Epstein’s assessment of the problems with the FDA drug approval process, he disagrees with his proposed solution. Professor Hall argues that Professor Epstein’s solution—to reduce the FDA to an advisory/information role after Phase I testing—devalues the mission of the FDA and has already been rejected by the body politic.   Instead, Professor Epstein contends that the solution to problems with the FDA drug approval process is to work to improve and optimize the system, not to eliminate it.

Aaron Perzanowski (Wayne State University Law School) responds to David Fagundes’s article, Property Rhetoric and the Public Domain. In In Defense of Intellectual Property Anxiety, Professor Perzanowski expresses skepticism about two assumptions underlying the argument for embracing property rhetoric to promote the public domain. This argument assumes, first, public recognition of social discourse theory as an account of property and, second, rhetorical advantages of social discourse theory that are comparable to those of more familiar notions of private property. Perzanowski concludes that the simple intuitive appeal of Blackstonian property cautions against styling the struggle for balanced copyright and patent policy as a debate over competing property interests.

Ted Sampsell-Jones (William Mitchell College of Law) replies to Professors Cribari and Judges’s article, Speaking of Silence: A Reply to “Making Defendants Speak. In On Silence, Professor Sampsell-Jones argues that their theory of the Self-Incrimination Clause, which relies on intuition to determine which practices are necessary to “test the prosecution” in criminal cases, is lacking in both textual support and practical utility. As a result, he concludes that their defense of Griffin v. California is unconvincing.

1

Minnesota Law Review 94:5 (May 2010)

minnesota-logo2

Volume 94, Issue 5 (May 2010):

2009 Symposium: Cyberspace & the Law

Nicole M. Murphy, Symposium Foreward: Cyberspace & the Law, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1303 (2010)

Pamela Samuelson, Google Book Search and the Future of Books in Cyberspace, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1308 (2010)

Dan L. Burk, Cybermarks, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1375 (2010)

William W. Fisher, III, The Implications for Law of User Innovation, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1417 (2010)

Jane E. Kirtley, Mask, Shield, and Sword: Should the Journalist’s Privilege Protect the Identity of Anonymous Posters to News Media Websites?, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1478 (2010)

Paul Ohm, Probably Probable Cause: The Diminishing Importance of Justification Standards, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1514 (2010)

Orin S. Kerr, Vagueness Challenges to the Computer Fraud and Abuse Act, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1561 (2010)

Christopher Slobogin, Proportionality, Privacy, and Public Opinion: A Reply to Kerr and Swire, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1588  (2010)

Notes

Lindsay K. Eastman, Revising the Organizational Sentencing Guidelines to Eliminate the Focus on Compliance Programs and Cooperation in Determining Corporate Sentence Mitigation, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1620 (2010)

Anna Hickman, Born (Not So) Free: Legal Limits on the Practice of Unassisted Childbirth or Freebirthing in the United States, 94 Minn. 1651 (2010)

Julie Kaster, The Voice of Victims: Debating the Appropriate Role of Fraud Victim Allocution Under the Crime Victims’ Rights Act, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1682 (2010)

0

Minnesota Law Review 94:1 (November 2009)

minnesota-logo2

Volume 94, Issue 1 (November 2009):

Articles

Richard A. Epstein, Against Permititis: Why Voluntary Organizations Should Regulate the Use of Cancer Drugs, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 1 (2009)

John H. Martin, Reconfiguring Estate Settlement, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 42 (2009)

Gerard N. Magliocca, Why Did the Incorporation of the Bill of Rights Fail in the Late Nineteenth Century?, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 102 (2009)

Notes

Theresa Nagy, Credit Rating Agencies and the First Amendment: Applying Constitutional Journalistic Protections to Subprime Mortgage Litigation, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 140 (2009)

Kristin K. Zinsmaster, In re the Welfare of Due Process, 94 Minn. L. Rev. 168 (2009)