<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Fordham Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/author/Fordham-Law-Review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Law Review, Volume 78 Number 5 (April 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-5-april-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-5-april-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 Apr 2010 17:22:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fordham Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=27508</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
</p>



Volume 78
April 2010
Number 5



<p>SYMPOSIUM
THE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION</p>
<p>Foreword:  The Great Recession and
the Legal Profession
Eli Wald</p>
<p>The Transformation of Large Law Firm Organization and Structure
</p>
<p>Team of Rivals?  Toward a New Model
of the Corporate Attorney-Client Relationship
David B. Wilkins</p>
<p>Supply Chains and Porous Boundaries:
The Disaggregation of Legal Services
Milton C. Regan, Jr. &#38; Palmer T. Heenan</p>
<p>Multidisciplinary Practice Redux:
Globalization, Core Values, and
Reviving the MDP Debate in America
Paul D. Paton</p>
<p>The Changing Professional Landscape of Large Law Firms</p>
<p>Glass Ceilings and Dead Ends:  Professional
Ideologies, Gender Stereotypes, and the
Future of Women Lawyers at Large Law Firms
Eli Wald</p>
<p>So, You Want To Be a Lawyer?
The Quest for Professional Status in a
Changing Legal World
Joyce S. Sterling &#38; Nancy Reichman</p>
<p>The Evolving Institutional and Psychological Infrastructure for
Ethical Decision Making at Large Law Firms</p>
<p>The Risk of Risk [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/fordham-law-review/7983.htm"><br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21298" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/fordhamlrev_header.jpg" border="0" alt="fordhamlrev_header" width="500" height="177" /></a></p>
<table style="width: 500px;" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="167">Volume 78</td>
<td width="166">April 2010</td>
<td width="167">Number 5</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p><strong>SYMPOSIUM<br />
THE ECONOMIC DOWNTURN AND THE LEGAL PROFESSION</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Wald_Foreword_April_2009.pdf">Foreword:  The Great Recession and<br />
the Legal Profession</a><br />
Eli Wald</p>
<p><strong>The Transformation of Large Law Firm Organization and Structure<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Wilkins_April_2009.pdf">Team of Rivals?  Toward a New Model<br />
of the Corporate Attorney-Client Relationship</a><br />
David B. Wilkins</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Regan_Heenan_April_2010.pdf">Supply Chains and Porous Boundaries:<br />
The Disaggregation of Legal Services</a><br />
Milton C. Regan, Jr. &amp; Palmer T. Heenan</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Paton_April_2010.pdf">Multidisciplinary Practice Redux:<br />
Globalization, Core Values, and<br />
Reviving the MDP Debate in America</a><br />
Paul D. Paton</p>
<p><strong>The Changing Professional Landscape of Large Law Firms</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Wald_April_2010.pdf">Glass Ceilings and Dead Ends:  Professional<br />
Ideologies, Gender Stereotypes, and the<br />
Future of Women Lawyers at Large Law Firms</a><br />
Eli Wald</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Reichman_Sterling_April_2010.pdf">So, You Want To Be a Lawyer?<br />
The Quest for Professional Status in a<br />
Changing Legal World</a><br />
Joyce S. Sterling &amp; Nancy Reichman</p>
<p><strong>The Evolving Institutional and Psychological Infrastructure for<br />
Ethical Decision Making at Large Law Firms</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Landsman_April_2010.pdf">The Risk of Risk Management</a><br />
Stephan Landsman</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Needham_April_2010.pdf">Listening to Cassandra:  The Difficulty of<br />
Recognizing Risks and Taking Action</a><br />
Carol A. Needham</p>
<p><strong>Large Law Firms and the Public Interest:<br />
Provision of Pro Bono Services by Large Law Firms</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Cummings_Rhode_April_2010.pdf">Managing Pro Bono:  Doing Well by<br />
Doing Better</a><br />
Scott L. Cummings &amp; Deborah L. Rhode</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Abel_April_2010.pdf">The Paradoxes of Pro Bono</a><br />
Richard Abel</p>
<p><span id="more-27508"></span></p>
<p><strong>ARTICLE<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Kleinfeld_April_2010.pdf">Skeptical Internationalism:  A Study<br />
of Whether International Law Is Law</a><br />
Joshua Kleinfeld</p>
<p><strong>NOTES<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Beaver_April_2010.pdf">Getting a Fix on Cocaine Sentencing Policy:<br />
Reforming the Sentencing Scheme of the<br />
Anti-Drug Abuse Act of 1986</a><br />
Alyssa L. Beaver</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Chase_April_2010.pdf">Who Is Secure?:  A Framework for <em>Arizona v. Gant</em></a><br />
David S. Chase</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Dietly_April_2010.pdf">Lightening the Load:  Whether the Burden<br />
of Proof for Overcoming a Patent’s Presumption<br />
of Validity Should Be Lowered</a><br />
Kristen Dietly</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Hill_April_2010.pdf">The Rule 10b-5 Suit:  Loss Causation Pleading<br />
Standards in Private Securities Fraud Claims<br />
After <em>Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Broudo</em></a><br />
Evan Hill</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Sittenreich_April_2010.pdf">The Rocky Path for Private Directors General:<br />
Procedure, Politics, and the Uncertain Future<br />
of EU Antitrust Damages Actions</a><br />
Marc A. Sittenreich</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-5-april-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Law Review Symposium on April 16 &amp; 17:  The Adequacy of the Presidential Succession System in the 21st Century</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/fordham-law-review-symposium-on-april-16-17-the-adequacy-of-the-presidential-succession-system-in-the-21st-century.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/fordham-law-review-symposium-on-april-16-17-the-adequacy-of-the-presidential-succession-system-in-the-21st-century.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 Apr 2010 04:23:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fordham Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conferences]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Politics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26865</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>

The Fordham Law Review is organizing this event along with former Fordham Law School Dean John D. Feerick, a preeminent scholar on the Twenty-Fifth Amendment, and former Senator Birch Bayh, framer of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment.</p>
<p>The event is a two-day symposium, bringing together leading thinkers and experienced practitioners in the area of presidential succession:  Former Senator Birch Bayh, who, as framer of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment and chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments, oversaw the hearings and debate on the topic; those who were on the front lines in developing the presidential succession structure (Fred Fielding, former White House Counsel to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, and Benton Becker who served as Counsel to President Ford); those who have written on the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/fordham-law-review/7983.htm"><br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21298" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/fordhamlrev_header.jpg" border="0" alt="fordhamlrev_header" width="414" height="147" /></a><br />
The <a href="http://fordhamlawreview.org">Fordham Law Review</a> is organizing this event along with former Fordham Law School Dean John D. Feerick, a preeminent scholar on the Twenty-Fifth Amendment, and former Senator Birch Bayh, framer of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment.</p>
<p>The event is a two-day symposium, bringing together leading thinkers and experienced practitioners in the area of presidential succession:  Former Senator Birch Bayh, who, as framer of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment and chairman of the Senate Subcommittee on Constitutional Amendments, oversaw the hearings and debate on the topic; those who were on the front lines in developing the presidential succession structure (Fred Fielding, former White House Counsel to Presidents Ronald Reagan and George W. Bush, and Benton Becker who served as Counsel to President Ford); those who have written on the subject from a variety of perspectives (Professors Akhil Amar, John Feerick, Edward Foley, Joel Goldstein, Robert Gilbert, and Rose McDermott); Dr. John Fortier and Norman Ornstein, whose work on the Continuity in Government Commission has evaluated the adequacy of this system in a post-9/11 world; Constitutional Law scholars Dean William Treanor, Professor James Fleming, and Robert Kaczorowski; as well as Bill Baker, President Emeritus of WNET.ORG.</p>
<p>The Fordham Law Review will publish the symposium in its December 2010 issue.</p>
<p>Among a number of topics that will be discussed are the ambiguities in the existing constitutional provisions (for example, can presidents invoke the inability provision of the Twenty-Fifth Amendment to temporarily step down during moments of political crisis?); analysis of the constitutionality of the current Succession Act, which puts members of Congress in the line of succession; recommendations for handling a double vacancy in the Presidency and Vice Presidency and the constitutionality of current proposals for dealing with such a dilemma; important gaps and conflicts at various stages of transition (for example, disability or death prior to election or inauguration and potential conflict of interests arising in confirmation hearings of an appointed Vice President); and the constitutionality of informal—extraconstitutional and extrastatutory—arrangements between Presidents and their Vice Presidents, members of their cabinet, and members of Congress.</p>
<p><strong>WHEN:</strong><br />
Friday, April 16 from 9:30 to 5:00 and Saturday, April 17 from 9:30 to 1:00<br />
<strong>WHERE:</strong><br />
Fordham Law School<br />
McNally Amphitheatre<br />
140 West 62nd Street<br />
New York, NY  10023<br />
<strong>This event is free and open to the public.<br />
</strong><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/fordham-law-review/17598.htm">Full Schedule here.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/04/fordham-law-review-symposium-on-april-16-17-the-adequacy-of-the-presidential-succession-system-in-the-21st-century.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Law Review, Volume 78 Number 4 (March 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-4-march-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-4-march-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 13 Mar 2010 17:33:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fordham Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26017</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
</p>



Volume 78

<p align="center">March 2010</p>


<p align="right">Number 4</p>




<p align="center">ARTICLES
</p>
<p>Property in Crisis
Nestor M. Davidson &#38; Rashmi Dyal-Chand</p>
<p>Prospective Compensation in Lieu of a Final
Injunction in Patent and Copyright Cases
H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui</p>
<p align="center">ESSAY
</p>
<p>Reducing Information Gaps To Reduce the Tax Gap:
When Is Information Reporting Warranted?
Leandra Lederman</p>
<p align="center">NOTES
</p>
<p>To Catch a Predator or To Save His Marriage:
Advocating for an Expansive Child Abuse Exception
to the Marital Privileges in Federal Courts
Emily C. Aldridge</p>
<p>Freedom, Finality, and Federal Preemption:
Seeking Expanded Judicial Review of Arbitration
Awards Under State Law After Hall Street
Brian T. Burns</p>
<p>The CAFA Mass Action Numerosity Requirement:
Three Problems with Counting to 100
Guyon Knight</p>
<p>Matters of Public Safety and the Current
Quarrel over the Scope of the Quarles
Exception to Miranda
Rorie A. Norton</p>
<p>Using Disparate Impact Analysis in Fair Housing
Act Claims:  Landlord Withdrawal from
the Section 8 Voucher Program
Rebecca Tracy Rotem</p>
<p>Strictly Wrong [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/fordham-law-review/7983.htm"><br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21298" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/fordhamlrev_header.jpg" border="0" alt="fordhamlrev_header" width="500" height="177" /></a></p>
<table align="center" style="width: 500px" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="167">Volume 78</td>
<td width="166">
<p align="center">March 2010</p>
</td>
<td width="167">
<p align="right">Number 4</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="center"><b>ARTICLES<br />
</b></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Davidson_-_Dyal-Chand__March_2010.pdf">Property in Crisis</a><br />
Nestor M. Davidson &amp; Rashmi Dyal-Chand</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Gomez-Arostegui__March_2010.pdf">Prospective Compensation in Lieu of a Final<br />
Injunction in Patent and Copyright Cases</a><br />
H. Tomás Gómez-Arostegui</p>
<p align="center"><b>ESSAY<br />
</b></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Lederman__March_2010.pdf">Reducing Information Gaps To Reduce the Tax Gap:<br />
When Is Information Reporting Warranted?</a><br />
Leandra Lederman</p>
<p align="center"><b>NOTES<br />
</b></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Aldridge__March_2010.pdf">To Catch a Predator or To Save His Marriage:<br />
Advocating for an Expansive Child Abuse Exception<br />
to the Marital Privileges in Federal Courts</a><br />
Emily C. Aldridge</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Burns_March_2010.pdf">Freedom, Finality, and Federal Preemption:<br />
Seeking Expanded Judicial Review of Arbitration<br />
Awards Under State Law After Hall Street</a><br />
Brian T. Burns</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Knight__March_2010.pdf">The CAFA Mass Action Numerosity Requirement:<br />
Three Problems with Counting to 100</a><br />
Guyon Knight</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Norton__March_2010.pdf">Matters of Public Safety and the Current<br />
Quarrel over the Scope of the <em>Quarles</em><br />
Exception to <em>Miranda</em></a><br />
Rorie A. Norton</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Rotem__March_2010.pdf">Using Disparate Impact Analysis in Fair Housing<br />
Act Claims:  Landlord Withdrawal from<br />
the Section 8 Voucher Program</a><br />
Rebecca Tracy Rotem</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Shin-Li_March_2010.pdf">Strictly Wrong as a Tax Policy:  The Strict<br />
Liability Penalty Standard in Noneconomic<br />
Substance Transactions</a><br />
Mik Shin-Li</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-4-march-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Law Review, Volume 78 Number 3 (December 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-3-december-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-3-december-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Dec 2009 19:19:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fordham Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=23034</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>




<p align="left">Volume 78</p>


<p align="center">December 2009</p>


<p align="right">Number 3</p>




<p align="center">SYMPOSIUM
AGAINST SETTLEMENT:  TWENTY-FIVE YEARS LATER</p>
<p>Foreword:  Reflections on the
Adjudication-Settlement Divide
Howard M. Erichson</p>
<p>Some Thoughts About the
Economics of Settlement
John Bronsteen</p>
<p>Revisiting Against Settlement:  Some
Reflections on Dispute Resolution
and Public Values
Amy J. Cohen</p>
<p>Reexamining the Arguments in
Owen M. Fiss, Against Settlement
Kenneth R. Feinberg</p>
<p>The Public Value of Settlement
Samuel Issacharoff &#38; Robert H. Klonoff</p>
<p>Three Things To Be Against
(“Settlement” Not Included)
Michael Moffitt</p>
<p>Mediation Exceptionality
Jacqueline Nolan-Haley</p>
<p>Comments on Owen M. Fiss,
Against Settlement (1984)
Hon. Jack B. Weinstein</p>
<p>The History of an Idea
Owen M. Fiss
</p>
<p align="center">ARTICLE
</p>
<p>What Owners Want and Governments Do:
Evidence from the Oregon Experiment
Bethany R. Berger
</p>
<p align="center">NOTES
</p>
<p></p>
<p>Love Thy Neighbor:  Should Religious
Accommodations That Negatively
Affect Coworkers&#8217; Shift Preferences
Constitute an Undue Hardship on the
Employer Under Title VII?
Rachel M. Birnbach</p>
<p>The Rights of Divorced Lesbians:
Interstate Recognition of Child
Custody Judgments in the Context
of Same-Sex Divorce
Kathryn [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/fordham-law-review/15862.htm"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21298" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/fordhamlrev_header.jpg" border="0" alt="fordhamlrev_header" width="500" height="177" /></a></p>
<table style="width: 500px;" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="167">
<p align="left">Volume 78</p>
</td>
<td width="166">
<p align="center">December 2009</p>
</td>
<td width="167">
<p align="right">Number 3</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="center"><strong>SYMPOSIUM<br />
<em>AGAINST SETTLEMENT</em>:  TWENTY-FIVE YEARS LATER</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Erichson_December_2009.pdf">Foreword:  Reflections on the<br />
Adjudication-Settlement Divide</a><br />
Howard M. Erichson</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Bronsteen_December_2009.pdf">Some Thoughts About the<br />
Economics of Settlement</a><br />
John Bronsteen</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Cohen_December_2009.pdf">Revisiting <em>Against Settlement</em>:  Some<br />
Reflections on Dispute Resolution<br />
and Public Values</a><br />
Amy J. Cohen</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Feinberg_December_2009.pdf">Reexamining the Arguments in<br />
Owen M. Fiss, <em>Against Settlement</em></a><br />
Kenneth R. Feinberg</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Issacharoff__Klonoff_December_2009.pdf">The Public Value of Settlement</a><br />
Samuel Issacharoff &amp; Robert H. Klonoff</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Moffitt_December_2009.pdf">Three Things To Be Against<br />
(“Settlement” Not Included)</a><br />
Michael Moffitt</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Nolan-Haley_December_2009.pdf">Mediation Exceptionality</a><br />
Jacqueline Nolan-Haley</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Weinstein_December_2009.pdf">Comments on Owen M. Fiss,<br />
<em>Against Settlement</em> (1984)</a><br />
Hon. Jack B. Weinstein</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Fiss_December_2009.pdf">The History of an Idea</a><br />
Owen M. Fiss
</p>
<p align="center"><strong>ARTICLE<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Berger_December_2009.pdf">What Owners Want and Governments Do:<br />
Evidence from the Oregon Experiment</a><br />
Bethany R. Berger
</p>
<p align="center"><strong>NOTES<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Birnbach_December_2009.pdf"><span id="more-23034"></span></a></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Birnbach_December_2009.pdf">Love Thy Neighbor:  Should Religious<br />
Accommodations That Negatively<br />
Affect Coworkers&#8217; Shift Preferences<br />
Constitute an Undue Hardship on the<br />
Employer Under Title VII?</a><br />
Rachel M. Birnbach</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Harvey_December_2009.pdf">The Rights of Divorced Lesbians:<br />
Interstate Recognition of Child<br />
Custody Judgments in the Context<br />
of Same-Sex Divorce</a><br />
Kathryn J. Harvey</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Mazzeo_December_2009.pdf">Securities Class Actions, CAFA, and<br />
a Countrywide Crisis:  A Call for<br />
Clarity and Consistency</a><br />
Denise Mazzeo</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Northrop_December_2009.pdf">The Attorney-Client Privilege and<br />
Information Disclosed to an Attorney<br />
with the Intention That the Attorney<br />
Draft a Document To Be Released to<br />
Third Parties:  Public Policy Calls for<br />
at Least the Strictest Application of the<br />
Attorney-Client Privilege</a><br />
Daniel Northrop</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Rabinovitz_December_2009.pdf">Toward Effective Implementation of<br />
11 U.S.C. § 522(d)(11)(E):  Invigorating a<br />
Powerful Bankruptcy Exemption</a><br />
Uriel Rabinovitz</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Terenzi_December_2009.pdf">When Cows Fly:  Expanding Cognizable<br />
Injury-in-Fact and Interest Group Litigation</a><br />
Robert Terenzi, Jr.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-3-december-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Law Review, Volume 78 Number 2 (November 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-2-november-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-2-november-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 23:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fordham Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21868</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
</p>



Volume 78

<p align="center">November 2009</p>


<p align="right">Number 2</p>




<p align="center">THE ROBERT L. LEVINE DISTINGUISHED LECTURE
OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO IMMIGRANT REPRESENTATION:
EXPLORING SOLUTIONS</p>
<p>Deepening the Legal Profession&#8217;s Pro Bono
Commitment to the Immigrant Poor
Hon. Robert A. Katzmann
</p>
<p align="center">Report of Subcommittee 1:  Increasing Pro Bono Activity
</p>
<p>The Representational and Counseling
Needs of the Immigrant Poor
Jennifer L. Colyer, Sarah French Russell, Robert E. Juceam &#38; Lewis J. Liman
</p>
<p align="center">Reports of Subcommittee 2:  Enhancing Mechanisms for Service Delivery</p>
<p>Introduction
Claudia Slovinsky</p>
<p>The Immigration Representation Project:
Meeting the Critical Needs of Low-Wage and
Indigent New Yorkers Facing Removal
Jojo Annobil</p>
<p>Barriers to Representation for Detained
Immigrants Facing Deportation:  Varick
Street Detention Facility, A Case Study
Peter L. Markowitz</p>
<p align="center">Report of Subcommittee 3:  Addressing Inadequate Representation</p>
<p>Regulating Immigration Legal Service Providers:
Inadequate Representation and Notario Fraud
Careen Shannon</p>
<p align="center">Essay</p>
<p>A View from the Immigration Bench
Hon. Noel Brennan</p>
<p align="center">Epilogue</p>
<p>Representation for Immigrants:
A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/fordham-law-review/7983.htm"><br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21298" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/fordhamlrev_header.jpg" border="0" alt="fordhamlrev_header" width="500" height="177" /></a></p>
<table style="width: 500px;" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="167">Volume 78</td>
<td width="166">
<p align="center">November 2009</p>
</td>
<td width="167">
<p align="right">Number 2</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="center"><strong>THE ROBERT L. LEVINE DISTINGUISHED LECTURE<br />
OVERCOMING BARRIERS TO IMMIGRANT REPRESENTATION:<br />
EXPLORING SOLUTIONS</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Katzmann_November_2009.pdf">Deepening the Legal Profession&#8217;s Pro Bono<br />
Commitment to the Immigrant Poor</a><br />
Hon. Robert A. Katzmann
</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Report of Subcommittee 1:  Increasing Pro Bono Activity<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Juceam_November_2009.pdf">The Representational and Counseling<br />
Needs of the Immigrant Poor</a><br />
Jennifer L. Colyer, Sarah French Russell, Robert E. Juceam &amp; Lewis J. Liman
</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Reports of Subcommittee 2:  Enhancing Mechanisms for Service Delivery</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Slovinsky_November_2009.pdf">Introduction</a><br />
Claudia Slovinsky</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Annobil_November_2009.pdf">The Immigration Representation Project:<br />
Meeting the Critical Needs of Low-Wage and<br />
Indigent New Yorkers Facing Removal</a><br />
Jojo Annobil</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Markowitz_November_2009.pdf">Barriers to Representation for Detained<br />
Immigrants Facing Deportation:  Varick<br />
Street Detention Facility, A Case Study</a><br />
Peter L. Markowitz</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Report of Subcommittee 3:  Addressing Inadequate Representation</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Shannon_November_2009.pdf">Regulating Immigration Legal Service Providers:<br />
Inadequate Representation and Notario Fraud</a><br />
Careen Shannon</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Essay</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Brennan_November_2009.pdf">A View from the Immigration Bench</a><br />
Hon. Noel Brennan</p>
<p align="center"><strong>Epilogue</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Chin_November_2009.pdf">Representation for Immigrants:<br />
A Judge&#8217;s Personal Perspective</a><br />
Hon. Denny Chin</p>
<p align="center"><strong>ARTICLES<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Sandoval_November_2009.pdf">Disclosure, Deception, and Deep-Packet<br />
Inspection: The Role of the Federal Trade<br />
Commission Act&#8217;s Deceptive Conduct<br />
Prohibitions in the Net Neutrality Debate</a><br />
Catherine J. K. Sandoval</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Sloan_November_2009.pdf">The Dog That Didn&#8217;t Bark:  Stealth<br />
Procedures and the Erosion of Stare Decisis<br />
in the Federal Courts of Appeals</a><br />
Amy E. Sloan
</p>
<p align="center"><strong><span id="more-21868"></span>NOTES<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Colasacco_November_2009.pdf">Where Were the Accountants?<br />
Deepening Insolvency as a Means of Ensuring<br />
Accountants&#8217; Presence When Corporate<br />
Turmoil Materializes</a><br />
Lauren Colasacco</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Klinka_November_2009.pdf">It&#8217;s Been a Privilege:  Advising Patients<br />
of the <em>Tarasoff</em> Duty and Its<br />
Legal Consequences for the Federal<br />
Psychotherapist-Patient Privilege</a><br />
Elisia Klinka</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/McNamara_November_2009.pdf">How the Decisions in Favor of the <em>Stein</em><br />
Thirteen Will Affect the Litigation of<br />
Corporate Crime and Department of<br />
Justice Policies and Expand the<br />
Sixth Amendment Right to Counsel</a><br />
Christopher McNamara</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Nicholds_November_2009.pdf">The Free Jammie Movement:  Is<br />
Making a File Available to Other Users over a<br />
Peer-to-Peer Computer<br />
Network Sufficient To Infringe the Copyright<br />
Owner&#8217;s 17 U.S.C. § 106(3) Distribution Right?</a><br />
Ken Nicholds</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Yanovich_November_2009.pdf">Answering Justice Scalia&#8217;s Question:<br />
Dual Sovereignty and the Sixth<br />
Amendment Right to Counsel<br />
After <em>Texas v. Cobb</em> and <em>Montejo v. Louisiana</em></a><br />
Ryan M. Yanovich
</p>
<p align="center"><strong>COMMENT<br />
</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Patel_November_2009.pdf">Delayed Access to Generic Medicine:<br />
A Comment on the Hatch-Waxman<br />
Act and the &#8220;Approval Bottleneck&#8221;</a><br />
Ankur N. Patel</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-2-november-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Law Review, Volume 78 Number 1 (October 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-1-october-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-1-october-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fordham Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21297</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
</p>



Volume 78

<p align="center">October 2009</p>


<p align="right">Number 1</p>




<p align="center">THE PHILIP D. REED LECTURE SERIES</p>
<p>Sanctions in Electronic Discovery Cases:  Views from the Judges
Panel Discussion</p>
<p align="center">ESSAY
</p>
<p>A Matter of Context:  Social Framework Evidence in Employment Discrimination Class Actions
Melissa Hart &#38; Paul M. Secunda</p>
<p align="center">ARTICLE
</p>
<p>Toward a Duty-Based Theory of Executive Power
David M. Driesen</p>
<p align="center">NOTES
</p>
<p>Post-Davis Conduit Bonds:  At the Intersection of the Dormant Commerce Clause and Municipal Debt
Sean Carey</p>
<p>Best Evidence and the Wayback Machine:  Toward a Workable Authentication Standard for Archived Internet Evidence
Deborah R. Eltgroth</p>
<p>&#8220;The Right of the People&#8221;:  The NSA, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance of Americans Overseas
Jonathan D. Forgang</p>
<p>What the Right Hand Gives:  Prohibitive Interpretations of the State Constitutional Right to Bail
Ariana Lindermayer</p>
<p>An Analysis of the Judicial Panel on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/fordham-law-review/7983.htm"><br />
<img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-21298" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/fordhamlrev_header.jpg" border="0" alt="fordhamlrev_header" width="500" height="177" /></a></p>
<table align="center" style="width: 500px" border="0">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="167">Volume 78</td>
<td width="166">
<p align="center">October 2009</p>
</td>
<td width="167">
<p align="right">Number 1</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p align="center"><b>THE PHILIP D. REED LECTURE SERIES</b></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/ReedLecture_October_2009.pdf">Sanctions in Electronic Discovery Cases:  Views from the Judges</a><br />
Panel Discussion</p>
<p align="center"><b>ESSAY<br />
</b></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Hart_Secunda_October_2009.pdf">A Matter of Context:  Social Framework Evidence in Employment Discrimination Class Actions</a><br />
Melissa Hart &amp; Paul M. Secunda</p>
<p align="center"><b>ARTICLE<br />
</b></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Driesen_October_2009.pdf">Toward a Duty-Based Theory of Executive Power</a><br />
David M. Driesen</p>
<p align="center"><b>NOTES<br />
</b></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Carey_October_2009.pdf">Post-<em>Davis</em> Conduit Bonds:  At the Intersection of the Dormant Commerce Clause and Municipal Debt</a><br />
Sean Carey</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Eltgroth_October_2009.pdf">Best Evidence and the Wayback Machine:  Toward a Workable Authentication Standard for Archived Internet Evidence</a><br />
Deborah R. Eltgroth</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Forgang_October_2009.pdf">&#8220;The Right of the People&#8221;:  The NSA, the FISA Amendments Act of 2008, and Foreign Intelligence Surveillance of Americans Overseas</a><br />
Jonathan D. Forgang</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Lindermayer_October_2009.pdf">What the Right Hand Gives:  Prohibitive Interpretations of the State Constitutional Right to Bail</a><br />
Ariana Lindermayer</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Richards_October_2009.pdf">An Analysis of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation&#8217;s Selection of Transferee District and Judge</a><br />
Daniel A. Richards</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/Scolnik_October_2009.pdf">Protections for Electronic Communications:  The Stored Communications Act and the Fourth Amendment</a><br />
Alexander Scolnik</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/assets/LawReview/VanOstrand_October_2009.pdf">A Close Look at ADEA Mixed-Motives Claims and <em>Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.</em></a><br />
Leigh A. Van Ostrand</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/fordham-law-review-volume-78-number-1-october-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Law Review, Volume 77 Number 6 (May 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/fordham-law-review-volume-77-number-6-may-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/fordham-law-review-volume-77-number-6-may-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2009 03:47:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fordham Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=17093</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"></p>




<p align="left">Volume 77</p>


<p align="center">May 2009</p>


<p align="right">Number 6</p>




<p style="text-align: center;">ARTICLES</p>
<p>The Pros and Cons of Politically Reversible &#8220;Semisubstantive&#8221; Constitutional Rules
Dan T. Coenen</p>
<p>The Right Remedy for the Wrongly Convicted:  Judicial Sanctions for Destruction of DNA Evidence
Cynthia E. Jones</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">ESSAY</p>
<p>Combat Veterans, Mental Health Issues, and the Death Penalty:  Addressing the Impact of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury
Anthony E. Giardino</p>
<p style="text-align: center;">NOTES</p>
<p style="text-align: left;">Beyond Lawrence v. Texas:  Crafting a Fundamental Right to Sexual Privacy
Kristin Fasullo</p>
<p>Meet Two-Face:  The Dualistic Rule 10b-5 and the Quandary of Offsetting Losses by Gains
Samuel Francis</p>
<p>Ferreting Out Favoritism:  Bringing Pretext Claims after Kelo
Daniel S. Hafetz</p>
<p>Adding Insult to Injury?:  The Untoward Impact of Requiring More Than De Minimis Injury in an Eighth Amendment Excessive Force Case
Robyn D. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p style="text-align: center;"><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/ihtml/page3.ihtml?imac=1135"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-17092" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/06/fordhamlrev_header.jpg" alt="fordhamlrev_header" width="500" height="177" /></a></p>
<table style="width: 500px;" border="0" align="center">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td width="167" align="top">
<p align="left">Volume 77</p>
</td>
<td width="166" align="top">
<p align="center">May 2009</p>
</td>
<td width="167" align="top">
<p align="right">Number 6</p>
</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub18457.pdf">The Pros and Cons of Politically Reversible &#8220;Semisubstantive&#8221; Constitutional Rules</a><br />
Dan T. Coenen</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub18458.pdf">The Right Remedy for the Wrongly Convicted:  Judicial Sanctions for Destruction of DNA Evidence</a><br />
Cynthia E. Jones</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>ESSAY</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub18459.pdf">Combat Veterans, Mental Health Issues, and the Death Penalty:  Addressing the Impact of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Traumatic Brain Injury</a><br />
Anthony E. Giardino</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p style="text-align: left;"><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub18460.pdf">Beyond <em>Lawrence v. Texas</em>:  Crafting a Fundamental Right to Sexual Privacy</a><br />
Kristin Fasullo</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub18461.pdf">Meet Two-Face:  The Dualistic Rule 10b-5 and the Quandary of Offsetting Losses by Gains</a><br />
Samuel Francis</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub18462.pdf">Ferreting Out Favoritism:  Bringing Pretext Claims after <em>Kelo</em></a><br />
Daniel S. Hafetz</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub18463.pdf">Adding Insult to Injury?:  The Untoward Impact of Requiring More Than De Minimis Injury in an Eighth Amendment Excessive Force Case</a><br />
Robyn D. Hoffman</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub18464.pdf">Untying Our Hands:  The Case for Uniform Personal Jurisdiction Over &#8220;Libel Tourists&#8221;</a><br />
Todd W. Moore</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub18465.pdf">Hedges or Thickets:  Protecting Investors From Hedge Fund Managers&#8217; Conflicts of Interest</a><br />
Ryan Sklar</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub18466.pdf">Back to Basics:  Determining a Child&#8217;s Habitual Residence in International Child Abduction Cases Under the Hague Convention</a><br />
Tai Vivatvaraphol</p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub18467.pdf">Third-Party Consent Searches After <em>Randolph</em>:  The Circuit Split Over Police Removal of an Objecting Tenant</a><br />
Matthew W. J. Webb</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/fordham-law-review-volume-77-number-6-may-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Law Review, Issue 76:5 (April 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/fordham_law_rev_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/fordham_law_rev_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:59:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fordham Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/04/fordham-law-review-issue-765-april-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Fordham Law Review, Issue 76:5 (April 2008)</p>
<p>(Contents of past issues are available at our website)</p>
<p>ESSAY</p>
<p>Melissa B. Jacoby, Home Ownership Risk Beyond a Subprime Crisis:  The Role of Delinquency Management, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2261 (2008).</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>John Bronsteen, Brendan S. Maher &#038; Peter K. Stris, ERISA, Agency Costs, and the Future of Health Care in the United States, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2297 (2008).</p>
<p>Kevin K. Washburn, Restoring the Grand Jury, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2333 (2008).</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>Gregory Apgar, Prudential Standing Limitations on Lanham Act False Advertising Claims, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2389 (2008).</p>
<p>Jennifer A. Gniady, Regulating Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing:  Protecting the Consumer Without Quashing a Medical Revolution, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2429 (2008).</p>
<p>Amanda L. Houle, From T-Shirts to Teaching:  May Public Schools Constitutionally Regulate Antihomosexual [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Fordham-logo3.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Fordham-logo3.jpg" width="503" height="142" /></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/ihtml/page3.ihtml?imac=1162&#038;issueID=352">Fordham Law Review, Issue 76:5 (April 2008)</a></p>
<p><em>(Contents of <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/ihtml/page3.ihtml?imac=1161">past issues</a> are available at our website)</em></p>
<p><strong>ESSAY</strong></p>
<p>Melissa B. Jacoby, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub12250.pdf">Home Ownership Risk Beyond a Subprime Crisis:  The Role of Delinquency Management</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2261 (2008).</p>
<p><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p>John Bronsteen, Brendan S. Maher &#038; Peter K. Stris, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub12251.pdf">ERISA, Agency Costs, and the Future of Health Care in the United States</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2297 (2008).</p>
<p>Kevin K. Washburn, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub12252.pdf">Restoring the Grand Jury</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2333 (2008).</p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p>Gregory Apgar, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub12253.pdf">Prudential Standing Limitations on Lanham Act False Advertising Claims</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2389 (2008).</p>
<p>Jennifer A. Gniady, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub12254.pdf">Regulating Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing:  Protecting the Consumer Without Quashing a Medical Revolution</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2429 (2008).</p>
<p>Amanda L. Houle, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub12259.pdf">From T-Shirts to Teaching:  May Public Schools Constitutionally Regulate Antihomosexual Speech?</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2477 (2008).</p>
<p>Lauren E. Sasser, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub12255.pdf">Waiting in Immigration Limbo:  The Federal Court Split over Suits to Compel Action on Stalled Adjustment of Status Applications</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2511 (2008).</p>
<p>James M. Shea, Jr., <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub12256.pdf">Who Is at the Table?  Interpreting Disclosure Requirements for Ad Hoc Groups of Institutional Investors Under Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 2019</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2561 (2008).</p>
<p>Andrew V. Trask, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub12257.pdf">“Obvious to Try”:  A Proper Patentability Standard in the Pharmaceutical Arts?</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2625 (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/fordham_law_rev_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Law Review, Issue 76:4 (March 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/fordham_law_rev_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/fordham_law_rev_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Apr 2008 03:36:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fordham Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/04/fordham-law-review-issue-764-march-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Fordham Law Review, Issue 76:4 (March 2008)</p>
<p>(Contents of past issues are available at our website)</p>
<p>ESSAY</p>
<p>Judith S. Kaye &#038; Anne C. Reddy, The Progress of Women Lawyers at Big Firms:  Steadied or Simply Studied?, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 1941 (2008).</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>Robert P. Bartlett III, Taking Finance Seriously:  How Debt Financing Distorts Bidding Outcomes in Corporate Takeovers, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 1975 (2008).</p>
<p>Roger A. Fairfax, Jr., Harmless Constitutional Error and the Institutional Significance of the Jury, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2027 (2008).</p>
<p>NOTES</p>
<p>Frank D&#8217;Angelo, Turf Wars:  Street Gangs and the Outer Limits of RICO&#8217;s &#8220;Affecting Commerce&#8221; Requirement, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2075 (2008).</p>
<p>George A. Mocsary, Explaining Away the Obvious:  The Infeasibility of Characterizing the Second Amendment as a Nonindividual Right, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2113 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Fordham-logo3.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Fordham-logo3.jpg" width="503" height="142" /></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/ihtml/page3.ihtml?imac=1162&#038;issueID=350">Fordham Law Review, Issue 76:4 (March 2008)</a></p>
<p><em>(Contents of <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/ihtml/page3.ihtml?imac=1161">past issues</a> are available at our website)</em></p>
<p><strong>ESSAY</strong></p>
<p>Judith S. Kaye &#038; Anne C. Reddy, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub11539.pdf">The Progress of Women Lawyers at Big Firms:  Steadied or Simply Studied?</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 1941 (2008).</p>
<p><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p>Robert P. Bartlett III, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub11540.pdf">Taking Finance Seriously:  How Debt Financing Distorts Bidding Outcomes in Corporate Takeovers</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 1975 (2008).</p>
<p>Roger A. Fairfax, Jr., <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub11541.pdf">Harmless Constitutional Error and the Institutional Significance of the Jury</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2027 (2008).</p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p>Frank D&#8217;Angelo, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub11542.pdf">Turf Wars:  Street Gangs and the Outer Limits of RICO&#8217;s &#8220;Affecting Commerce&#8221; Requirement</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2075 (2008).</p>
<p>George A. Mocsary, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub11543.pdf">Explaining Away the Obvious:  The Infeasibility of Characterizing the Second Amendment as a Nonindividual Right</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2113 (2008).</p>
<p>Amanda Sue Nichols, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub11544.pdf">Alien Tort Statute Accomplice Liability Cases:  Should Courts Apply the Plausability Pleading Standard of <em>Bell Atlantic v. Twombly</em>?</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2177 (2008).</p>
<p>Katherine A. Rocco, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub11545.pdf">Rule 26(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure:  In the Interest of Full Disclosure?</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 2227 (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/fordham_law_rev_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Fordham Law Review, Issue 76:2 (November 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/fordham_law_rev.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/fordham_law_rev.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Nov 2007 03:00:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fordham Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Fordham)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/11/fordham-law-review-issue-762-november-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Fordham Law Review, Issue 76:2 (November 2007)</p>
<p>(Contents of past issues are available at our website)</p>
<p>SYMPOSIUM:  NONPROFIT LAW, ECONOMIC CHALLENGES, AND THE FUTURE OF CHARITIES</p>
<p>Linda Sugin, Introduction, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 517 (2007).</p>
<p>Evelyn Brody, The Board of Nonprofit Organizations:  Puzzling Through the Gaps Between Law and Practice, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 521 (2007).</p>
<p>James J. Fishman, Wrong Way Corrigan and Recent Developments in the Nonprofit Landscape:  A Need for New Legal Approaches, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 567 (2007).</p>
<p>Marion R. Fremont-Smith, The Search for Greater Accountability of Nonprofit Organizations:  Recent Legal Developments and Proposals for Change, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 609 (2007).</p>
<p>Reynold Levy &#038; Glenn Lowry, Entrepreneurialism in Nonprofits, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 647 (2007).</p>
<p>John D. Colombo, Reforming Internal Revenue Code Provisions on Commercial [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Fordham-logo3.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Fordham-logo3.jpg" width="503" height="142" /></p>
<p><a href="http://law.fordham.edu/ihtml/page3.ihtml?imac=1135">Fordham Law Review, Issue 76:2 (November 2007)</a></p>
<p><em>(Contents of <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/ihtml/page3.ihtml?imac=1161">past issues</a> are available at our website)</em></p>
<p><strong>SYMPOSIUM:  NONPROFIT LAW, ECONOMIC CHALLENGES, AND THE FUTURE OF CHARITIES</strong></p>
<p>Linda Sugin, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9356.pdf">Introduction</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 517 (2007).</p>
<p>Evelyn Brody, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9357.pdf">The Board of Nonprofit Organizations:  Puzzling Through the Gaps Between Law and Practice</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 521 (2007).</p>
<p>James J. Fishman, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9358.pdf">Wrong Way Corrigan and Recent Developments in the Nonprofit Landscape:  A Need for New Legal Approaches</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 567 (2007).</p>
<p>Marion R. Fremont-Smith, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9359.pdf">The Search for Greater Accountability of Nonprofit Organizations:  Recent Legal Developments and Proposals for Change</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 609 (2007).</p>
<p>Reynold Levy &#038; Glenn Lowry, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9360.pdf">Entrepreneurialism in Nonprofits</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 647 (2007).</p>
<p>John D. Colombo, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9362.pdf">Reforming Internal Revenue Code Provisions on Commercial Activity by Charities</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 667 (2007).</p>
<p>John K. Eason, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9363.pdf">The Restricted Gift Life Cycle, or What Comes Around Goes Around</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 693 (2007).</p>
<p>Jill S. Manny, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9364.pdf">Nonprofit Payments to Insiders and Outsiders:  Is the Sky the Limit?</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 735 (2007).</p>
<p>Ellen P. Aprill, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9365.pdf">What Critiques of Sarbanes-Oxley Can Teach About Regulation of Nonprofit Governance</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 765 (2007).</p>
<p>Dana Brakman Reiser, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9366.pdf">Director Independence in the Independent Sector</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 795 (2007).</p>
<p>David A. Brennan, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9368.pdf">The Commerciality Doctrine as Applied to the Charitable Tax Exemption for Homes for the Aged:  State and Local Perspectives</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 833 (2007).</p>
<p><span id="more-12477"></span><br />
Michael S. Knoll, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9369.pdf">The UBIT:  Leveling an Uneven Playing Field or Tilting a Level One?</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 857 (2007).</p>
<p>Linda Sugin, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9370.pdf">Resisting the Corporatization of Nonprofit Governance:  Transforming Obedience into Fidelity</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 893 (2007).</p>
<p>Lesley Friedman Rosenthal, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9371.pdf">“Redeveloping” Corporate Governance Structures:  Not-for-Profit Governance During Major Capital Projects:  A Case Study at Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 929 (2007).</p>
<p><strong>LECTURE</strong></p>
<p>José A. Cabranes, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9372.pdf">Myth and Reality of University Trusteeship in the Post-Enron Era</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 955 (2007).</p>
<p><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p>Scott A. Moss, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9373.pdf">Fighting Discrimination While Fighting Litigation:  A Tale of Two Supreme Courts</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 981 (2007).</p>
<p>Peter T. Wendel, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9374.pdf">Protecting Newly Discovered Antiquities:  Thinking Outside the “Fee Simple” Box</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 1015 (2007).</p>
<p><strong>NOTES</strong></p>
<p>Michael Buescher, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9375.pdf">Rebuilding the Safety Mechanism:  Does 18 U.S.C. § 3553(e) Violate the Separation of Powers?</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 1065 (2007).</p>
<p>Nasim Farjad, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9376.pdf">Condemnation Friendly or Land Use Wise? A Broad Interpretation of the Public Use Requirement Works Well for New York City</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 1121 (2007).</p>
<p>Adam B. Perry, <a href="http://law.fordham.edu/publications/articles/500flspub9377.pdf">Which Cases Are “Such Cases”:  Interpreting and Applying Section 12 of the Clayton Act</a>, 76 Fordham L. Rev. 1177 (2007).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/fordham_law_rev.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

