<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Emory Law Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/author/Emory-Law-Journal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 06:27:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Emory Law Journal, Vol. 60, Issue 2 (March 2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/03/emory-law-journal-vol-60-issue-2-march-2011.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/03/emory-law-journal-vol-60-issue-2-march-2011.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Mar 2011 15:35:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emory Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=41932</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>The 2010 Thrower Symposium: The New New Deal: From De-Regulation to Re-Regulation</p>
<p>Martha Albertson Fineman, The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State</p>
<p>Ani B. Satz, Overcoming Fragmentation in Disability and Health Law</p>
<p>Polly J. Price, Federalization of the Mosquito: Structural Innovation in the New Deal Administrative State</p>
<p>William J. Novak, Law and the Social Control of American Capitalism</p>
<p>Article</p>
<p>Frank B. Cross &#38; James F. Spriggs II, The Most Important (and Best) Supreme Court Opinions and Justices</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Daniel Soleimani, The Difficulties with the Subpart F System of International Taxation: How the Schering-Plough Decision Indicates that the Status Quo Is Unclear and Unwise</p>
<p>Amy E. Jensen, When News Doesn&#8217;t Want to Be Free: Rethinking &#8220;Hot News&#8221; to Help Counter Free Riding on Newspaper Content Online</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a rel="attachment wp-att-41933" href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/03/emory-law-journal-vol-60-issue-2-march-2011.html/emory-lj-2"><img class="alignnone size-medium wp-image-41933" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/wp-content/uploads/2011/03/emory-lj1-300x65.jpg" alt="" width="300" height="65" /></a></p>
<p><strong>The 2010 Thrower Symposium: <em>The New New Deal: From De-Regulation to Re-Regulation</em></strong></p>
<p>Martha Albertson Fineman, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.2/Fineman.pdf">The Vulnerable Subject and the Responsive State</a></em></p>
<p>Ani B. Satz, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.2/Satz.pdf">Overcoming Fragmentation in Disability and Health Law</a></em></p>
<p>Polly J. Price, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.2/Satz.pdf">Federalization of the Mosquito: Structural Innovation in the New Deal Administrative State</a></em></p>
<p>William J. Novak, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.2/Novak.pdf">Law and the Social Control of American Capitalism</a></em></p>
<p><strong>Article</strong></p>
<p>Frank B. Cross &amp; James F. Spriggs II, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.2/Cross_Spriggs.pdf">The Most Important (and Best) Supreme Court Opinions and Justices</a></em></p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Daniel Soleimani, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.2/Soleimani.pdf">The Difficulties with the Subpart F System of International Taxation: How the </a></em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.2/Soleimani.pdf">Schering-Plough </a><em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.2/Soleimani.pdf">Decision Indicates that the Status Quo Is Unclear and Unwise</a></em></p>
<p>Amy E. Jensen, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.2/Jensen.pdf">When News Doesn&#8217;t Want to Be Free: Rethinking &#8220;Hot News&#8221; to Help Counter Free Riding on Newspaper Content Online</a></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/03/emory-law-journal-vol-60-issue-2-march-2011.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emory Law Journal, Vol. 60, Issue 1 (October 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/10/emory-law-journal-vol-60-issue-1-october-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/10/emory-law-journal-vol-60-issue-1-october-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 Oct 2010 14:25:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emory Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Articles and Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Constitutional Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Current Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=35422</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
<p></p>
<p>Vol. 60, Issue 1 (October 2010)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Allan Erbsen, Impersonal Jurisdiction, 60 Emory L.J. 1 (2010)</p>
<p>David Zaring, A Lack of Resolution, 60 Emory L.J. 97 (2010)</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Adam McDonell Moline, Nineteenth-Century Principles for Twenty-First-Century Pleading, 60 Emory L.J. 159 (2010)</p>
<p>Sarah Ilene Stein, Wake Up Fannie, I Think I Got Something to Say to You: Financing Community Land Trust Homebuyers Without Stripping Affordability Provisions, 60 Emory L.J. 209 (2010)</p>
<p>
</p>

]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj"><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/emory-lj.jpg" alt="emory-lj.jpg" width="524" height="115" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Vol. 60, Issue 1 (October 2010)</strong></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small">Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small"><span style="font-size: small">Allan Erbsen, </span><em><span style="font-size: small"><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.1/Erbsen.pdf">Impersonal Jurisdiction</a></span></em><span style="font-size: small">, 60 Emory L.J. 1 (2010)</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small"><span style="font-size: small">David Zaring, </span><em><span style="font-size: small"><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.1/Zaring.pdf">A Lack of Resolution</a></span></em><span style="font-size: small">, 60 Emory L.J. 97 (2010)</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: xx-small"><strong><span style="font-size: small">Comments</span></strong></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: xx-small"><span style="font-size: small">Adam McDonell Moline, </span><em><span style="font-size: small"><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.1/Moline.pdf">Nineteenth-Century Principles for Twenty-First-Century Pleading</a></span></em><span style="font-size: small">, 60 Emory L.J. 159 (2010)</span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: xx-small"><span style="font-size: small">Sarah Ilene Stein, </span><em><span style="font-size: small"><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/60/60.1/Stein.pdf">Wake Up Fannie, I Think I Got Something to Say to You: Financing Community Land Trust Homebuyers Without Stripping Affordability Provisions</a></span></em><span style="font-size: small">, 60 Emory L.J. 209 (2010)</span></span></p>
<p><strong><span style="font-size: small"><br />
</span></strong></p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/10/emory-law-journal-vol-60-issue-1-october-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emory Law Journal 58:4 (2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/emory_law_journ_8.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/emory_law_journ_8.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 03:52:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emory Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/04/emory-law-journal-584-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Emory Law Journal, 58:4 (2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Jonathan Remy Nash, The Majority That Wasn’t: Stare Decisis, Majority Rule, and the Mischief of Quorum Requirements, 58 EMORY L.J. 831 (2009)</p>
<p>Peter Lee, Contracting to Preserve Open Science: Consideration-Based Regulation in Patent Law, 58 EMORY L.J. 889 (2009)</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Jennifer E. Fairbairn, Keeping  Grable Slim: Federal Question Jurisdiction and the Centrality Test, 58 EMORY L.J. 977 (2009)</p>
<p>Michael P. Jungman, You’ve Got Libel: How the CAN-SPAM Act Delivers Defamation Liability to Spam-Fighters and Why the First Amendment Should Delete the Problem, 58 EMORY L.J. 1013 (2009)</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj"><img alt="emory-lj.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/emory-lj.jpg" width="524" height="115" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj">Emory Law Journal</a>, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-4/TOC_58-4.pdf">58:4 (2009)</a></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Jonathan Remy Nash, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-4/Nash.pdf"><em>The Majority That Wasn’t: Stare Decisis, Majority Rule, and the Mischief of Quorum Requirements</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 831 (2009)</p>
<p>Peter Lee, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-4/Lee.pdf"><em>Contracting to Preserve Open Science: Consideration-Based Regulation in Patent Law</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 889 (2009)</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Jennifer E. Fairbairn, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-4/Fairbairn.pdf"><em>Keeping </em> Grable<em> Slim: Federal Question Jurisdiction and the Centrality Test</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 977 (2009)</p>
<p>Michael P. Jungman, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-4/Jungman.pdf"><em>You’ve Got Libel: How the CAN-SPAM Act Delivers Defamation Liability to Spam-Fighters and Why the First Amendment Should Delete the Problem</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 1013 (2009)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/emory_law_journ_8.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emory Law Journal 58:3 (2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/emory_law_journ_9.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/emory_law_journ_9.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:48:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emory Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/03/emory-law-journal-583-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Emory Law Journal, 58:3 (2009)</p>
<p>Article</p>
<p>Frederick Mark Gedicks, An Originalist Defense of Substantive Due Process: Magna Carta, Higher-Law Constitutionalism, and the Fifth Amendment, 58 EMORY L.J. 585 (2009)</p>
<p>Essays</p>
<p>Jeremy Waldron, Can There Be a Democratic Jurisprudence?, 58 EMORY L.J. 675 (2009)</p>
<p>Marcel Kahan &#038; Edward Rock, How To Prevent Hard Cases from Making Bad Law: Bear Stearns, Delaware, and the Strategic Use of Comity, 58 EMORY L.J. 713 (2009)</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Margaret J. Kochuba, Public Health vs. Patient Rights: Reconciling Informed Consent with HPV Vaccination, 58 EMORY L.J. 761 (2009)</p>
<p>Sean Jessee, Fulfilling the Promise of the Medicaid Act: Why the Equal Access Clause Creates Privately Enforceable Rights, 58 EMORY L.J. 791 (2009)</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj"><img alt="emory-lj.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/emory-lj.jpg" width="524" height="115" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj">Emory Law Journal</a>, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-3/TOC_58-3_1_.pdf">58:3 (2009)</a></p>
<p><strong>Article</strong></p>
<p>Frederick Mark Gedicks, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-3/Gedicks.pdf"><em>An Originalist Defense of Substantive Due Process: Magna Carta, Higher-Law Constitutionalism, and the Fifth Amendment</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 585 (2009)</p>
<p><strong>Essays</strong></p>
<p>Jeremy Waldron, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-3/Waldron.pdf"><em>Can There Be a Democratic Jurisprudence?</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 675 (2009)</p>
<p>Marcel Kahan &#038; Edward Rock, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-3/Kahan_Rock.pdf"><em>How To Prevent Hard Cases from Making Bad Law: Bear Stearns, Delaware, and the Strategic Use of Comity</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 713 (2009)</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Margaret J. Kochuba, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-3/Kochuba.pdf"><em>Public Health vs. Patient Rights: Reconciling Informed Consent with HPV Vaccination</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 761 (2009)</p>
<p>Sean Jessee, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-3/Jessee.pdf"><em>Fulfilling the Promise of the Medicaid Act: Why the Equal Access Clause Creates Privately Enforceable Rights</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 791 (2009)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/emory_law_journ_9.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emory Law Journal 58:2 (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/emory_law_journ_7.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/emory_law_journ_7.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:41:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emory Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/01/emory-law-journal-582-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Emory Law Journal, 58:2 (2008)</p>
<p>The 2008 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium &#8212; Legal Science: An Interdisciplinary Examination of the Use and Misuse of Science in the Law</p>
<p>Thomas O. McGarity, Corporate Accountability for Scientific Fraud: Ketek and the Perils of Aggressive Agency Preemption, 58 EMORY L.J. 287 (2008)</p>
<p>Katherine L. Gross &#038; Gary G. Mittelbach, What Maintains the Integrity of Science: An Essay for Nonscientists, 58 EMORY L.J. 341 (2008)</p>
<p>Joni Hersch, Skin Color Discrimination and Immigrant Pay, 58 EMORY L.J. 357 (2008)</p>
<p>David E. Adelman, The Challenge of Abrupt Climate Change for U.S. Environmental Regulation, 58 EMORY L.J. 379 (2008)</p>
<p>Lisa Heinzerling, Thrower Keynote Address: The Role of Science in Massachusetts v. EPA, 58 EMORY L.J. 411 (2008)</p>
<p>William H. Schlesinger, An Ecologist’s Thoughts on Forests and Farms in a Cap-and-Trade [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj"><img alt="emory-lj.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/emory-lj.jpg" width="524" height="115" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj">Emory Law Journal</a>, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-2/Cover.pdf">58:2 (2008)</a></p>
<p><strong>The 2008 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium &#8212; Legal Science: An Interdisciplinary Examination of the Use and Misuse of Science in the Law</strong></p>
<p>Thomas O. McGarity, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-2/McGarity.pdf"><em>Corporate Accountability for Scientific Fraud: Ketek and the Perils of Aggressive Agency Preemption</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 287 (2008)</p>
<p>Katherine L. Gross &#038; Gary G. Mittelbach, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-2/Gross_Mittelbach.pdf"><em>What Maintains the Integrity of Science: An Essay for Nonscientists</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 341 (2008)</p>
<p>Joni Hersch, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-2/Hersch.pdf"><em>Skin Color Discrimination and Immigrant Pay</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 357 (2008)</p>
<p>David E. Adelman, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-2/Adelman.pdf"><em>The Challenge of Abrupt Climate Change for U.S. Environmental Regulation</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 379 (2008)</p>
<p>Lisa Heinzerling, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-2/Heinzerling.pdf"><em>Thrower Keynote Address: The Role of Science in <em>Massachusetts v. EPA</em></em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 411 (2008)</p>
<p>William H. Schlesinger, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-2/Schlesinger.pdf"><em>An Ecologist’s Thoughts on Forests and Farms in a Cap-and-Trade System</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 423 (2008)</p>
<p>Julie A. Seaman, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-2/Seaman.pdf"><em>Black Boxes</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 427 (2008)</p>
<p>Erin Murphy, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-2/Murphy.pdf"><em>The Art in the Science of DNA: A Layperson’s Guide to the Subjectivity Inherent in Forensic DNA Typing</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 489 (2008)</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>John P. Figura, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-2/Figura.pdf"><em>You’re in the Army Now: Borrowed Servants, Dual Servants, and Torts Committed by Contractors’ Employees in the Theaters of U.S. Military Operations</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 513 (2008)</p>
<p>Gabrielle Marie D’Adamo, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-2/D_Adamo.pdf"><em>Separatism in the Age of Public School Choice: A Constitutional Analysis</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 547 (2008)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/emory_law_journ_7.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emory Law Journal 58:1 (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/emory_law_journ_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/emory_law_journ_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:17:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emory Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/01/emory-law-journal-581-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Emory Law Journal, 58:1 (2008)</p>
<p>The Future of Law, Religion, and the Family: A 25th Anniversary Symposium Sponsored by the Center for the Study of Law and Religion</p>
<p>Leah Ward Sears, Foreword: The Frontiers of Law, Religion, and Marriage, 58 EMORY L.J. 1 (2008)</p>
<p>Enola G. Aird, Toward a Renaissance for the African-American Family: Confronting the Lie of Black Inferiority, 58 EMORY L.J. 7 (2008)</p>
<p>Stephen L. Carter, Religion, Education, and the Primacy of the Family, 58 EMORY L.J. 23 (2008)</p>
<p>Don S. Browning, Modern Law and Christian Jurisprudence on Marriage and Family, 58 EMORY L.J. 31 (2008)</p>
<p>Margaret F. Brinig, Children’s Beliefs and Family Law, 58 EMORY L.J. 55 (2008)</p>
<p>Jean Bethke Elshtain, “There Oughta Be a Law”—Not Necessarily, 58 EMORY L.J. 71 (2008)</p>
<p>John Witte, Jr., Afterword: Exploring the Frontiers of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj"><img alt="emory-lj.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/emory-lj.jpg" width="524" height="115" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj">Emory Law Journal</a>, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-1/Cover.pdf">58:1 (2008)</a></p>
<p><strong>The Future of Law, Religion, and the Family: A 25th Anniversary Symposium Sponsored by the Center for the Study of Law and Religion</strong></p>
<p>Leah Ward Sears, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-1/Sears.pdf"><em>Foreword: The Frontiers of Law, Religion, and Marriage</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 1 (2008)</p>
<p>Enola G. Aird, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-1/Aird.pdf"><em>Toward a Renaissance for the African-American Family: Confronting the Lie of Black Inferiority</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 7 (2008)</p>
<p>Stephen L. Carter, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-1/Carter.pdf"><em>Religion, Education, and the Primacy of the Family</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 23 (2008)</p>
<p>Don S. Browning, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-1/Browning.pdf"><em>Modern Law and Christian Jurisprudence on Marriage and Family</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 31 (2008)</p>
<p>Margaret F. Brinig, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-1/Brinig.pdf"><em>Children’s Beliefs and Family Law</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 55 (2008)</p>
<p>Jean Bethke Elshtain, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-1/Elshtain.pdf"><em>“There Oughta Be a Law”—Not Necessarily</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 71 (2008)</p>
<p>John Witte, Jr., <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-1/Witte.pdf"><em>Afterword: Exploring the Frontiers of Law, Religion, and Family Life</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 87 (2008)</p>
<p><strong>Article &#038; Essay</strong></p>
<p>Alexandra B. Klass &#038; Elizabeth J. Wilson, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-1/Klass_Wilson.pdf"><em>Climate Change and Carbon Sequestration: Assessing a Liability Regime for Long-Term Storage of Carbon Dioxide</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 103 (2008)</p>
<p>Mark A. Lemley &#038; Bhaven Sampat, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-1/Lemley_Sampat.pdf"><em>Is the Patent Office a Rubber Stamp?</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 181 (2008)</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Michael L. Eber, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-1/Eber.pdf"><em>When the Dissent Creates the Law: Cross-Cutting Majorities and the Prediction Model of Precedent</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 207 (2008)</p>
<p>Erin E. Patrick, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/58-1/Patrick.pdf"><em>Lose Weight or Lose Out: The Legality of State Medicaid Programs That Make Overweight Beneficiaries’ Receipt of Funds Contingent Upon Health Lifestyle Choices</em></a>, 58 EMORY L.J. 249 (2008)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/emory_law_journ_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emory Law Journal 57:6 (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/emory_law_journ_6.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/emory_law_journ_6.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Sep 2008 08:13:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emory Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/09/emory-law-journal-576-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Emory Law Journal, 57:6 (2008)</p>
<p>IN PRAISE OF A LEGAL POLYMATH: A SPECIAL ISSUE DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF HAROLD J. BERMAN (1918-2007)</p>
<p>Including tributes by Frank S. Alexander, David J. Bederman, Michael J. Broyde, William E. Butler, W. Cole Durham, Jr., Edward McGlynn Gaffney, Jr., Peter Hay, John T. Noonan, Jr., Boris Ossipian, Michael Perry, John Quigley, Yuri Senokosov, David Sun, Detlev F. Vagts, Tibor Varady, Lloyd W. Weinreb, John Witte, Jr., and Reinhard Zimmermann.</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>David A. Skeel, Jr., The Unbearable Lightness of Christian Legal Scholarship, 57 EMORY L.J. 1471 (2008).</p>
<p>John Witte, Jr., Prophets, Priests, and Kings: John Milton and the Reformation of Rights and Liberties in England, 57 EMORY L.J. 1527 (2008).</p>
<p>Comment</p>
<p>Eric R. Swibel, Churches and Campaign Intervention: Why the Tax Man is Right and How [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj"><img alt="emory-lj.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/emory-lj.jpg" width="524" height="115" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj">Emory Law Journal</a>, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-6/Cover.pdf">57:6 (2008)</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-6/Berman_Tribute.pdf"><strong>IN PRAISE OF A LEGAL POLYMATH: A SPECIAL ISSUE DEDICATED TO THE MEMORY OF HAROLD J. BERMAN (1918-2007)</strong></a></p>
<p>Including tributes by Frank S. Alexander, David J. Bederman, Michael J. Broyde, William E. Butler, W. Cole Durham, Jr., Edward McGlynn Gaffney, Jr., Peter Hay, John T. Noonan, Jr., Boris Ossipian, Michael Perry, John Quigley, Yuri Senokosov, David Sun, Detlev F. Vagts, Tibor Varady, Lloyd W. Weinreb, John Witte, Jr., and Reinhard Zimmermann.</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>David A. Skeel, Jr., <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-6/Skeel.pdf"><em>The Unbearable Lightness of Christian Legal Scholarship</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 1471 (2008).</p>
<p>John Witte, Jr., <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-6/Witte.pdf"><em>Prophets, Priests, and Kings: John Milton and the Reformation of Rights and Liberties in England</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 1527 (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p>Eric R. Swibel, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-6/Swibel.pdf"><em>Churches and Campaign Intervention: Why the Tax Man is Right and How Congress Can Improve His Reputation</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 1605 (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/emory_law_journ_6.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emory Law Journal 57:5 (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/08/emory_law_journ_4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/08/emory_law_journ_4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 Aug 2008 08:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emory Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/08/emory-law-journal-575-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Emory Law Journal, 57:5 (2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Adam Benforado &#038; Jon Hanson, Legal Academic Backlash: The Response of Legal Theorists to Situationist Insights, 57 EMORY L.J. 1087 (2008).</p>
<p>Janet Koven Levit, Bottom-Up Lawmaking Through a Pluralist Lens:The ICC Banking Commission and the Transnational Regulation of Letters of Credit, 57 EMORY L.J. 1147 (2008).</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Frank B. Cross, Thomas A. Smith &#038; Antonio Tomarchio, The Reagan Revolution in the Network of Law, 57 EMORY L.J. 1227 (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Sarah Tope Reise, &#8220;Just Say No&#8221; to Pro-Drug and Alcohol Student Speech: The Constitutionality of School Prohibitions of Student Speech Promoting Drug and Alcohol Use, 57 EMORY L.J. 1259 (2008).</p>
<p>Andrea Vanina Arias, Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Swords and Armor: Regulating the Theft of Virtual Goods, 57 EMORY L.J. 1301 (2008).</p>
<p>Amber Leigh Bagley, An Era [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj"><img alt="emory-lj.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/emory-lj.jpg" width="524" height="115" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj">Emory Law Journal</a>, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-5/front_cover_57-5.pdf">57:5 (2008)</a></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Adam Benforado &#038; Jon Hanson, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-5/Benforado___Hanson.pdf"><em>Legal Academic Backlash: The Response of Legal Theorists to Situationist Insights</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 1087 (2008).</p>
<p>Janet Koven Levit, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-5/Levit.pdf"><em>Bottom-Up Lawmaking Through a Pluralist Lens:The ICC Banking Commission and the Transnational Regulation of Letters of Credit</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 1147 (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Essay</strong></p>
<p>Frank B. Cross, Thomas A. Smith &#038; Antonio Tomarchio, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-5/Cross.pdf"><em>The Reagan Revolution in the Network of Law</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 1227 (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Sarah Tope Reise, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-5/Tope_Reise.pdf"><em>&#8220;Just Say No&#8221; to Pro-Drug and Alcohol Student Speech: The Constitutionality of School Prohibitions of Student Speech Promoting Drug and Alcohol Use</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 1259 (2008).</p>
<p>Andrea Vanina Arias, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-5/Arias.pdf"><em>Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Swords and Armor: Regulating the Theft of Virtual Goods</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 1301 (2008).</p>
<p>Amber Leigh Bagley, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-5/Bagley.pdf"><em>An Era of Human Zoning: Banishing Sex Offenders from Communities Through Residence and Work Restrictions</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 1347 (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/08/emory_law_journ_4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emory Law Journal 57:4 (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/emory_law_journ_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/emory_law_journ_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jul 2008 16:33:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emory Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/emory-law-journal-574-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Emory Law Journal, 57:4 (2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Thomas A. Piraino, Jr., The Antitrust Analysis of Joint Ventures after the Supreme Court&#8217;s Daugher Decision, 57 EMORY L.J. 735 (2008).</p>
<p>Frederick Tung, The New Death of Contract: Creeping Corporate Fiduciary Duties for Creditors, 57 EMORY L.J. 809 (2008).</p>
<p>DEBATE: Saving the World with Corporate Law?</p>
<p>Kent Greenfield, Proposition: Saving the World with Corporate Law, 57 EMORY L.J. 948 (2008).</p>
<p>D. Gordon Smith, Response: The Dystopian Potential of Corporate Law, 57 EMORY L.J. 985 (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Jordon T. Stringer, Criminalizing Voter Suppression: The Necessity of Restoring Legitimacy in Federal Elections and Reversing Disillusionment in Minority Communities, 57 EMORY L.J. 1011 (2008).</p>
<p>Elisabeth Bassett, Reform Through Exposure, 57 EMORY L.J. 1049 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj"><img alt="emory-lj.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/emory-lj.jpg" width="524" height="115" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj">Emory Law Journal</a>, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-4/Cover.pdf">57:4 (2008)</a></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Thomas A. Piraino, Jr., <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-4/Piraino.pdf"><em>The Antitrust Analysis of Joint Ventures after the Supreme Court&#8217;s Daugher Decision</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 735 (2008).</p>
<p>Frederick Tung, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-4/Tung.pdf"><em>The New Death of Contract: Creeping Corporate Fiduciary Duties for Creditors</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 809 (2008).</p>
<p><strong>DEBATE: Saving the World with Corporate Law?</strong></p>
<p>Kent Greenfield, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-4/Greenfield.pdf"><em>Proposition: Saving the World with Corporate Law</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 948 (2008).</p>
<p>D. Gordon Smith, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-4/Smith.pdf"><em>Response: The Dystopian Potential of Corporate Law</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 985 (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Jordon T. Stringer, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-4/Stringer.pdf"><em>Criminalizing Voter Suppression: The Necessity of Restoring Legitimacy in Federal Elections and Reversing Disillusionment in Minority Communities</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 1011 (2008).</p>
<p>Elisabeth Bassett, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-4/Bassett.pdf"><em>Reform Through Exposure</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 1049 (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/emory_law_journ_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emory Law Journal 57:3 (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/06/emory_law_journ_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/06/emory_law_journ_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emory Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/06/emory-law-journal-573-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Emory Law Journal, 57:3 (2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Adam Benforado &#038; Jon Hanson, Naive Cynicism: Maintaining False Perceptions in Policy Debates, 57 EMORY L.J. 499 (2008).</p>
<p>Thomas R. Lee, Glenn L. Christensen &#038; Eric D. DeRosia, Trademarks, Consumer Psychology, and the Sophisticated Consumer, 57 EMORY L.J. 575 (2008).</p>
<p>Comments</p>
<p>Juhi Kaveeshvar, Kicking the Rock &#038; the Hard Place to the Curb: An Alternative and Integrated Approach to Suicidal Students in Higher Education, 57 EMORY L.J. 651 (2008).</p>
<p>Carlissa R. Carson, The Military Commissions Act of 2006: How its Inability to Curb Abusive Interrogations Threatens the Future Treatment of Detainees and the United States Reputation, 57 EMORY L.J. 695 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj"><img alt="emory-lj.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/emory-lj.jpg" width="524" height="115" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj">Emory Law Journal</a>, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-3/Cover.pdf">57:3 (2008)</a></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Adam Benforado &#038; Jon Hanson, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-3/Benforado_Hanson.pdf"><em>Naive Cynicism: Maintaining False Perceptions in Policy Debates</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 499 (2008).</p>
<p>Thomas R. Lee, Glenn L. Christensen &#038; Eric D. DeRosia, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-3/Lee_Christensen_DeRosia.pdf"><em>Trademarks, Consumer Psychology, and the Sophisticated Consumer</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 575 (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comments</strong></p>
<p>Juhi Kaveeshvar, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-3/Kaveeshvar.pdf"><em>Kicking the Rock &#038; the Hard Place to the Curb: An Alternative and Integrated Approach to Suicidal Students in Higher Education</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 651 (2008).</p>
<p>Carlissa R. Carson, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-3/Carson.pdf"><em>The Military Commissions Act of 2006: How its Inability to Curb Abusive Interrogations Threatens the Future Treatment of Detainees and the United States Reputation</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 695 (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/06/emory_law_journ_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emory Law Journal, 57:2 (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/06/emory_law_journ_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/06/emory_law_journ_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 04:25:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emory Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/06/emory-law-journal-572-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Emory Law Journal, 57:2 (2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Adam Benforado &#038; Jon Hanson, The Great Attributional Divide: How Divergent Views of Human Behavior are Shaping Legal Policy, 57 EMORY L.J. 311 (2008).</p>
<p>Barak Y. Orbach, Indirect Free Riding on the Wheels of Commerce: Dual-Use Technologies and Copyright Liability, 57 EMORY L.J. 409 (2008).</p>
<p>Comment</p>
<p>C. Jordan Myers, Learning to Live with Jones v. Flowers: A “New Wrinkle” For an Old Standard, 57 EMORY L.J. 463 (2008).</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj"><img alt="emory-lj.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/emory-lj.jpg" width="524" height="115" /></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/elj">Emory Law Journal</a>, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-2/Cover.pdf">57:2 (2008)</a></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Adam Benforado &#038; Jon Hanson, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-2/Benforado_Hanson.pdf"><em>The Great Attributional Divide: How Divergent Views of Human Behavior are Shaping Legal Policy</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 311 (2008).</p>
<p>Barak Y. Orbach, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-2/Orbach.pdf"><em>Indirect Free Riding on the Wheels of Commerce: Dual-Use Technologies and Copyright Liability</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 409 (2008).</p>
<p><strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p>C. Jordan Myers, <a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/57-2/Myers.pdf"><em>Learning to Live with </em>Jones v. Flowers<em>: A “New Wrinkle” For an Old Standard</em></a>, 57 EMORY L.J. 463 (2008).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/06/emory_law_journ_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Emory Law Journal, 57:1 (December 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/02/emory_law_journ.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/02/emory_law_journ.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:11:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Emory Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Emory)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/02/emory-law-journal-571-december-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Emory Law Journal, 57:1 (December 2007)</p>
<p>The 2007 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium &#8212; The New Federalism: Plural Governance in a Decentered World</p>
<p>Robert B. Ahdieh, From Federalism to Intersystemic Governance: The Changing Nature of Modern Jurisdiction, 57 EMORY L.J. 1 (2007)</p>
<p>Articles &#038; Essays</p>
<p>Judith Resnik, Foreign as Domestic Affairs:  Rethinking Horizontal Federalism and Foreign Affairs Preemption in Light of Translocal Internationalism, 57 EMORY L.J. 31 (2007)</p>
<p>Ernest A. Young, Toward a Framework Statute for Supranational Adjudication, 57 EMORY L.J. 93 (2007)</p>
<p>Robert A. Schapiro, Federalism as Intersystemic Governance:  Legitimacy in a Post-Westphalian World, 57 EMORY L.J. 115 (2007)</p>
<p>Mark Tushnet, Judicial Enforcement of Federalist-Based Constitutional Limitations:  Some Skeptical Comparative Observations, 57 EMORY L.J. 135 (2007)</p>
<p>William W. Buzbee, Interaction&#8217;s Promise:  Preemption Policy Shifts, Risk Regulation, and Experimentalism Lessons, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="emory-lj.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/emory-lj.jpg" width="524" height="115" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/documents/front_cover_57-1.pdf">Emory Law Journal, 57:1 (December 2007)</a></p>
<p>The 2007 Randolph W. Thrower Symposium &#8212; The New Federalism: Plural Governance in a Decentered World</p>
<p>Robert B. Ahdieh, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/documents/Ahdieh_INTRO.pdf">From Federalism to Intersystemic Governance: The Changing Nature of Modern Jurisdiction</a></em>, 57 EMORY L.J. 1 (2007)</p>
<p><strong>Articles &#038; Essays</strong></p>
<p>Judith Resnik, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/documents/Resnik.pdf">Foreign as Domestic Affairs:  Rethinking Horizontal Federalism and Foreign Affairs Preemption in Light of Translocal Internationalism</a></em>, 57 EMORY L.J. 31 (2007)</p>
<p>Ernest A. Young, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/documents/Young.pdf">Toward a Framework Statute for Supranational Adjudication</a></em>, 57 EMORY L.J. 93 (2007)</p>
<p>Robert A. Schapiro, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/documents/Schapiro.pdf">Federalism as Intersystemic Governance:  Legitimacy in a Post-Westphalian World</a></em>, 57 EMORY L.J. 115 (2007)</p>
<p>Mark Tushnet, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/documents/Tushnet.pdf">Judicial Enforcement of Federalist-Based Constitutional Limitations:  Some Skeptical Comparative Observations</a></em>, 57 EMORY L.J. 135 (2007)</p>
<p>William W. Buzbee, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/documents/Buzbee.pdf">Interaction&#8217;s Promise:  Preemption Policy Shifts, Risk Regulation, and Experimentalism Lessons</a></em>, 57 EMORY L.J. 146 (2007)</p>
<p>Charles H. Koch, Jr., <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/documents/Koch.pdf">The Devolution of Implementing Policymaking in Network Governments</a></em>, 57 EMORY L.J. 167 (2007)</p>
<p>David J. Bederman, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/documents/Bederman.pdf">Diversity and Permeability in Transnational Governance</a></em>, 57 EMORY L.J. 201 (2007)</p>
<p>Robert B. Ahdieh, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/documents/Ahdieh_ESSAY.pdf">From Federal Rules to Intersystemic Governance in Securities Regulation</a></em>, 57 EMORY L.J. 233 (2007)</p>
<p><strong>Comments</p>
<p></strong></p>
<p>Jessica Leigh Rosenthal, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/documents/Rosenthal.pdf">The Interactive Process Disabled:  Improving ADA and Strengthening the EEOC Through the Adoption of the Interactive Process</a></em>, 57 EMORY L.J. 247 (2007)</p>
<p>Holly M. Sharp, <em><a href="http://www.law.emory.edu/fileadmin/journals/elj/documents/Sharp.pdf">The Day the Music Died:  How Overly Extended Copyright Terms Threaten the Very Existence of Our Nation&#8217;s Earliest Musical Works</a></em>, 57 EMORY L.J. 279 (2007)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/02/emory_law_journ.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

