<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Duke Law Journal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/author/Duke-Law-Journal/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 59    November 2009     Number 2</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/duke-law-journal-volume-59-november-2009-number-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/duke-law-journal-volume-59-november-2009-number-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Nov 2009 22:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=21820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 59    October 2009     Number 2</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>How the Dissent Becomes the Majority: Using Federalism to Transform Coalitions in the U.S. Supreme Court</p>
<p>Vanessa Baird &#38; Tonja Jacobi</p>
<p>Living Originalism</p>
<p>Thomas B. Colby &#38; Peter J. Smith</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Reasonableness Meets Requirements: Regulating Security and Privacy in Software</p>
<p>Paul N. Otto</p>
<p>Making Amends: Amending the ICSID Convention to Reconcile Competing Interests in International Investment Law</p>
<p>Kate M. Supnik</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 59    October 2009     Number 2</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+183+pdf">How the Dissent Becomes the Majority: Using Federalism to Transform Coalitions in the U.S. Supreme Court</a></p>
<p><em>Vanessa Baird &amp; Tonja Jacobi</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+239+pdf">Living Originalism</a></p>
<p><em>Thomas B. Colby &amp; Peter J. Smith</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+309+pdf">Reasonableness Meets Requirements: Regulating Security and Privacy in Software</a></p>
<p><em>Paul N. Otto</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+343+pdf">Making Amends: Amending the ICSID Convention to Reconcile Competing Interests in International Investment Law</a></p>
<p><em>Kate M. Supnik</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/duke-law-journal-volume-59-november-2009-number-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 59 October 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/duke-law-journal-volume-59-october-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/duke-law-journal-volume-59-october-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2009 18:39:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20874</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 59    October 2009     Number 1</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Constraining Public Employee Speech: Government&#8217;s Control of Its Workers&#8217; Speech to Protect Its Own Expression</p>
<p>Helen Norton</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Rescuing the Hero: The Ramifications of Expanding the Duty to Rescue on Society and the Law</p>
<p>Amelia H. Ashton</p>
<p>When Insiders Become Outsiders: Parental Objections to Public School Sex Education Programs</p>
<p>Emily J. Brown</p>
<p>The Fiduciary Duty in Mutual Fund Excessive Fee Cases: Ripe for Reexamination</p>
<p>Emily D. Johnson</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 59    October 2009     Number 1</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+1+pdf">Constraining Public Employee Speech: Government&#8217;s Control of Its Workers&#8217; Speech to Protect Its Own Expression</a></p>
<p><em>Helen Norton</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+69+pdf">Rescuing the Hero: The Ramifications of Expanding the Duty to Rescue on Society and the Law</a></p>
<p><em>Amelia H. Ashton</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+109+pdf">When Insiders Become Outsiders: Parental Objections to Public School Sex Education Programs</a></p>
<p><em>Emily J. Brown</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?59+Duke+L.+J.+145+pdf">The Fiduciary Duty in Mutual Fund Excessive Fee Cases: Ripe for Reexamination</a></p>
<p><em>Emily D. Johnson</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/10/duke-law-journal-volume-59-october-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 58 May 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/duke-law-journal-volume-58-may-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/duke-law-journal-volume-58-may-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2009 17:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Administrative Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=17939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    May 2009     Number 8</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Pitfalls of Empirical Studies that Attempt to Understand the Factors Affecting Appellate Decisionmaking</p>
<p>Hon. Harry T. Edwards &#38; Michael A. Livermore</p>
<p>A More Perfect System: The 2002 Reforms of the Board of Immigration Appeals</p>
<p>John D. Ashcroft &#38; Kris W. Kobach</p>
<p>The NLRB in Administrative Law Exile: Problems with Its Structure and Function and Suggestions for Reform</p>
<p>Catherine L. Fisk &#38; Deborah C. Malamud</p>
<p>Political Control of Federal Prosecutions: Looking Back and Looking Forward</p>
<p>Daniel Richman</p>
<p>Federalism Accountability: &#8220;Agency-Forcing&#8221; Measures</p>
<p>Catherine M. Sharkey</p>
<p>Depoliticizing Administrative Law</p>
<p>Cass R. Sunstein &#38; Thomas J. Miles</p>
<p>The Parliament of the Experts</p>
<p>Adrian Vermeule</p>
<p>Administration of War</p>
<p>John Yoo</p>
<p>Comment</p>
<p>Comment on Professor Yoo, Administration of War</p>
<p>Richard H. Kohn</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    May 2009     Number 8</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1895+pdf">Pitfalls of Empirical Studies that Attempt to Understand the Factors Affecting Appellate Decisionmaking</a></p>
<p><em>Hon. Harry T. Edwards &amp; Michael A. Livermore</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1991+pdf">A More Perfect System: The 2002 Reforms of the Board of Immigration Appeals</a></p>
<p><em>John D. Ashcroft &amp; Kris W. Kobach</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2013+pdf">The NLRB in Administrative Law Exile: Problems with Its Structure and Function and Suggestions for Reform</a></p>
<p><em>Catherine L. Fisk &amp; Deborah C. Malamud</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2087+pdf">Political Control of Federal Prosecutions: Looking Back and Looking Forward</a></p>
<p><em>Daniel Richman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2125+pdf">Federalism Accountability: &#8220;Agency-Forcing&#8221; Measures</a></p>
<p><em>Catherine M. Sharkey</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2193+pdf">Depoliticizing Administrative Law</a></p>
<p><em>Cass R. Sunstein &amp; Thomas J. Miles</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2231+pdf">The Parliament of the Experts</a></p>
<p><em>Adrian Vermeule</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2277+pdf">Administration of War</a></p>
<p><em>John Yoo</em></p>
<p><strong>Comment</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+2313+pdf">Comment on Professor Yoo, Administration of War</a></p>
<p><em>Richard H. Kohn</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/07/duke-law-journal-volume-58-may-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 58 April 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/duke-law-journal-volume-58-april-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/duke-law-journal-volume-58-april-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2009 02:27:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Articles and Books]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=15497</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58 	April 2009 	Number 7</p>
<p>Foreword</p>
<p>Measuring Judges and Justice</p>
<p>Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky &#38; Jonathan L. Williams</p>
<p>Introduction</p>
<p>“Only Connect”: Toward a Unified Measurement Project</p>
<p>David F. Levi &#38; Mitu Gulati</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Economic Trends and Judicial Outcomes: A Macrotheory of the Court</p>
<p>Thomas Brennan, Lee Epstein &#38; Nancy Staudt</p>
<p>The Warp and Woof of Statutory Interpretation: Comparing Supreme Court Approaches in Tax Law and Workplace Law</p>
<p>James J. Brudney &#38; Corey Ditslear</p>
<p>Judicial Evaluations and Information Forcing: Ranking State High Courts and Their Judges</p>
<p>Stephen J. Choi, Mitu Gulati &#38; Eric A. Posner</p>
<p>Judging the Judges</p>
<p>Frank B. Cross &#38; Stefanie Lindquist</p>
<p>Remaking the United States Supreme Court in the Courts’ of Appeals Image</p>
<p>Tracey E. George &#38; Chris Guthrie</p>
<p>The “Hidden Judiciary”: An Empirical Examination of Executive Branch Justice</p>
<p>Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski &#38; Andrew J. Wistrich</p>
<p>Are Empiricists Asking the Right [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg" width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58 	April 2009 	Number 7</p>
<p><strong>Foreword</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1173+pdf">Measuring Judges and Justice</a></p>
<p><em>Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky &amp; Jonathan L. Williams</em></p>
<p><strong>Introduction</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1181+pdf">“Only Connect”: Toward a Unified Measurement Project</a></p>
<p><em>David F. Levi &amp; Mitu Gulati</em></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1191+pdf">Economic Trends and Judicial Outcomes: A Macrotheory of the Court</a></p>
<p><em>Thomas Brennan, Lee Epstein &amp; Nancy Staudt</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1231+pdf">The Warp and Woof of Statutory Interpretation: Comparing Supreme Court Approaches in Tax Law and Workplace Law</a></p>
<p><em>James J. Brudney &amp; Corey Ditslear</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1313+pdf">Judicial Evaluations and Information Forcing: Ranking State High Courts and Their Judges</a></p>
<p><em>Stephen J. Choi, Mitu Gulati &amp; Eric A. Posner</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1383+pdf">Judging the Judges</a></p>
<p><em>Frank B. Cross &amp; Stefanie Lindquist</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1439+pdf">Remaking the United States Supreme Court in the Courts’ of Appeals Image</a></p>
<p><em>Tracey E. George &amp; Chris Guthrie</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1477+pdf">The “Hidden Judiciary”: An Empirical Examination of Executive Branch Justice</a></p>
<p><em>Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski &amp; Andrew J. Wistrich</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1531+pdf">Are Empiricists Asking the Right Questions about Judicial Decisionmaking?</a></p>
<p><em>Jack Knight</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1531+pdf">Predicting Court Outcomes through Political Preferences: The Japanese Supreme Court and the Chaos of 1993</a></p>
<p><em>J. Mark Ramseyer</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1589+pdf">Are Appointed Judges Strategic Too?</a></p>
<p><em>Joanna M. Shepherd</em></p>
<p><span id="more-15497"></span></p>
<p><strong>Responses</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1627+pdf">Justices as Economic Fixers: A Response to <em>A Macrotheory of the Court</em></a></p>
<p><em>Scott Baker, Adam Feibelman &amp; William P. Marshall</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1645+pdf">The Continuing Search for a Meaningful Model of Judicial Rankings and Why It (Unfortunately) Matters</a></p>
<p><em>Scott Baker, Adam Feibelman &amp; William P. Marshall</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1667+pdf">Probing the Effects of Judicial Specialization</a></p>
<p><em>Lawrence Baum</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1685+pdf">A Response to Professors George and Guthrie,<em> Remaking the United States Supreme Court in the Courts’ of Appeals Image</em></a></p>
<p><em>Michael Boudin</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1687+pdf">A Response to Professor Ramseyer, <em>Predicting Court Outcomes through Political Preferences</em></a></p>
<p><em>Michael Boudin</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1691+pdf">No Warrant for Radical Change: A Response to Professors George and Guthrie</a></p>
<p><em>Erwin Chemerinsky</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1703+pdf">Do Judges Think? Comments on Several Papers Presented at the<em> Duke Law Journal’s</em> Conference on Measuring Judges and Justice</a></p>
<p><em>Robert Henry</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1725+pdf">A Response to Professor Knight, <em>Are Empiricists Asking the Right Questions about Judicial Decisionmaking?</em></a></p>
<p><em>H. Jefferson Powell</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1731+pdf">On Doctors and Judges</a></p>
<p><em>Barak Richman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1743+pdf">Just Because You Can Measure Something, Does It Really Count?</a></p>
<p><em>Laura Denvir Stith</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1759+pdf">Does the Supreme Court Follow the Economic Returns? A Response to <em>A Macrotheory of the Court</em></a></p>
<p><em>Ernest A. Young &amp; Erin C. Blondel</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1783+pdf">The Court and the Code: A Response to <em>The Warp and Woof of Statutory Interpretation</em></a></p>
<p><em>Lawrence Zelenak</em></p>
<p><strong>Book Review</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1791+pdf">Autocrat of the Armchair</a></p>
<p><em>David F. Levi</em></p>
<p><strong>Interview</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1807+pdf">A Conversation with Judge Richard A. Posner</a></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1825+pdf">Applying Lawrence: Teenagers and the Crime against Nature</a></p>
<p><em>Daniel Allender</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1859+pdf">A Picture Imperfect: The Rights of Art Consignor-Collectors When Their Art Dealer Files for Bankruptcy</a></p>
<p><em>Hilary Jay</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/duke-law-journal-volume-58-april-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 58 March 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/duke_law_journa_12.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/duke_law_journa_12.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Mar 2009 22:08:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/03/duke-law-journal-volume-58-march-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    March 2009     Number 6</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Litigation Discovery Cannot Be Optimal but Could Be Better: The Economics of Improving Discovery Timing in a Digital Age</p>
<p>Scott A. Moss</p>
<p>The Lost History of Governance and Equal Protection</p>
<p>V.F. Nourse, Sarah A. Maguire</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Are American CEOs Overpaid, and, if So, What if Anything Should Be Done about It?</p>
<p>Richard A. Posner</p>
<p>Lecture</p>
<p>What Can Brown Do for You?: Neutral Principles and the Struggle over the Equal Protection Clause</p>
<p>Pamela S. Karlan</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Restoring RLUIPAs Equal Terms Provision</p>
<p>Sarah Keeton Campbell</p>
<p>Abandonment and Reconciliation: Addressing Political and Common Law Objections to Fetal Homicide Laws</p>
<p>Douglas S. Curran</p>
<p>Fraud on the Market Gets a Minitrial: Eisen through In re IPO</p>
<p>Patricia Groot</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    March 2009     Number 6</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+889+pdf">Litigation Discovery Cannot Be Optimal but Could Be Better: The Economics of Improving Discovery Timing in a Digital Age</a></p>
<p><em>Scott A. Moss</em></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+955+pdf">The Lost History of Governance and Equal Protection</a></p>
<p><em>V.F. Nourse, Sarah A. Maguire</em></p>
<p><strong>Essay</strong></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1013+pdf">Are American CEOs Overpaid, and, if So, What if Anything Should Be Done about It?</a></p>
<p><em>Richard A. Posner</em></p>
<p><strong>Lecture</strong></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1049+pdf">What Can Brown Do for You?: Neutral Principles and the Struggle over the Equal Protection Clause</a></p>
<p><em>Pamela S. Karlan</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1071+pdf">Restoring RLUIPAs Equal Terms Provision</a></p>
<p><em>Sarah Keeton Campbell</em></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1107+pdf">Abandonment and Reconciliation: Addressing Political and Common Law Objections to Fetal Homicide Laws</a></p>
<p><em>Douglas S. Curran</em></p>
<p><a href = "http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?58+Duke+L.+J.+1143+pdf">Fraud on the Market Gets a Minitrial: Eisen through In re IPO</a></p>
<p><em>Patricia Groot</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/duke_law_journa_12.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 58 February 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/duke_law_journa_10.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/duke_law_journa_10.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Feb 2009 20:56:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/duke-law-journal-volume-58-february-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    February 2009     Number 5</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Judgment-Sharing Agreements</p>
<p>Christopher R. Leslie</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Remembering Democracy in the Debate over Election Reform</p>
<p>Matthew Michael Calabria</p>
<p>A Question of Costs: Considering Pressure on White-Collar Criminal Defendants</p>
<p>Sarah Ribstein</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    February 2009     Number 5</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Judgment-Sharing Agreements</p>
<p><em>Christopher R. Leslie</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Remembering Democracy in the Debate over Election Reform</p>
<p><em>Matthew Michael Calabria</em></p>
<p>A Question of Costs: Considering Pressure on White-Collar Criminal Defendants</p>
<p><em>Sarah Ribstein</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/duke_law_journa_10.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Vol. 58 January 2009</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/duke_law_journa_9.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/duke_law_journa_9.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 17:39:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/01/duke-law-journal-vol-58-january-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    January 2009     Number 4</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Chevron&#8217;s Mistake</p>
<p>Lisa Schultz Bressman</p>
<p>Money, Politics, and Impartial Justice</p>
<p>Joanna M. Shepherd</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Avoiding Mere Incantations: Evaluating Success on Nonfee Claims When Determing Prevailing-Party Status under 42 U.S.C. § 1998</p>
<p>Jessica L. Brumley</p>
<p>Counting Offenses</p>
<p>Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    January 2009     Number 4</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Chevron&#8217;s Mistake</p>
<p><em>Lisa Schultz Bressman</em></p>
<p>Money, Politics, and Impartial Justice</p>
<p><em>Joanna M. Shepherd</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Avoiding Mere Incantations: Evaluating Success on Nonfee Claims When Determing Prevailing-Party Status under 42 U.S.C. § 1998</p>
<p><em>Jessica L. Brumley</em></p>
<p>Counting Offenses</p>
<p><em>Jeffrey M. Chemerinsky</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/duke_law_journa_9.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Volume 58 December Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/duke_law_journa_8.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/duke_law_journa_8.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Dec 2008 18:00:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/12/duke-law-journal-volume-58-december-issue.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    December 2008     Number 3</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Spending Clause Litigation in the Roberts Court</p>
<p>Samuel R. Bagenstos</p>
<p>Regulation with Placebo Effects</p>
<p>Anup Malani</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Constitutional Secrecy: Aligning National Security Letter Nondisclosure Provisions with First Amendment Rights</p>
<p>Brian D. Eyink</p>
<p>Milberg&#8217;s Monopoly: Restoring Honesty and Competition to the Plaintiffs&#8217; Bar</p>
<p>James P. McDonald</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    December 2008     Number 3</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Spending Clause Litigation in the Roberts Court</p>
<p><em>Samuel R. Bagenstos</em></p>
<p>Regulation with Placebo Effects</p>
<p><em>Anup Malani</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Constitutional Secrecy: Aligning National Security Letter Nondisclosure Provisions with First Amendment Rights</p>
<p><em>Brian D. Eyink</em></p>
<p>Milberg&#8217;s Monopoly: Restoring Honesty and Competition to the Plaintiffs&#8217; Bar</p>
<p><em>James P. McDonald</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/12/duke_law_journa_8.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal November 2008 Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_7.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_7.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:32:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/duke-law-journal-november-2008-issue.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    November 2008     Number 2</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Leaving the House: The Constitutional Status of Resignation from the House of Representatives</p>
<p>Josh Chafetz</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Victims&#8217; Rights in an Adversary System</p>
<p>Erin C. Blondel </p>
<p>The Newest Spectator Sport: Why Extending Victims&#8217; Rights to the Spectators&#8217; Gallery Erodes the Presumption of Innocence</p>
<p>Sierra Elizabeth</p>
<p>The Development and Failure of Social Norms in Second Life</p>
<p>Phillip Stoup</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    November 2008     Number 2</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Leaving the House: The Constitutional Status of Resignation from the House of Representatives</p>
<p><em>Josh Chafetz</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Victims&#8217; Rights in an Adversary System</p>
<p><em>Erin C. Blondel </em></p>
<p>The Newest Spectator Sport: Why Extending Victims&#8217; Rights to the Spectators&#8217; Gallery Erodes the Presumption of Innocence</p>
<p><em>Sierra Elizabeth</em></p>
<p>The Development and Failure of Social Norms in Second Life</p>
<p><em>Phillip Stoup</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/index">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_7.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal October 2008 Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_6.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_6.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:27:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/duke-law-journal-october-2008-issue.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 58    October 2008     Number 1</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Habeas Corpus and State Sentencing Reform: A Story of Unintended Consequences</p>
<p>Nancy J. King, Suzanna Sherry</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>A Divine Comity: Certification (at Last) in North Carolina</p>
<p>Eric Eisenberg</p>
<p>Buyer Beware: Why the Class Arbitration Waiver Presents a Gloomy Future for Consumers</p>
<p>Daniel R. Higginbotham 	</p>
<p>The Next &#8220;Great Dissenter&#8221;? How Clarence Thomas Is Using the Words and Principles of John Marshall Harlan to Craft a New Era of Civil Rights</p>
<p>Hannah L. Weiner</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 58    October 2008     Number 1</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Habeas Corpus and State Sentencing Reform: A Story of Unintended Consequences</p>
<p><em>Nancy J. King, Suzanna Sherry</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>A Divine Comity: Certification (at Last) in North Carolina</p>
<p><em>Eric Eisenberg</em></p>
<p>Buyer Beware: Why the Class Arbitration Waiver Presents a Gloomy Future for Consumers</p>
<p><em>Daniel R. Higginbotham 	</em></p>
<p>The Next &#8220;Great Dissenter&#8221;? How Clarence Thomas Is Using the Words and Principles of John Marshall Harlan to Craft a New Era of Civil Rights</p>
<p><em>Hannah L. Weiner</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/dljtoc58n1">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_6.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal May 2008 Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:25:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/duke-law-journal-may-2008-issue.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 57    May 2008     Number 7</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Administrative Law&#8217;s Federalism: Preemption, Delegation, and Agencies at the Edge of Federal Power</p>
<p>Brian Galle, Mark Seidenfeld</p>
<p>Administrative Law as the New Federalism</p>
<p>Gillian E. Metzger</p>
<p></p>
<p>Essays</p>
<p>Tennis with the Net Down: Administrative Federalism Without Congress</p>
<p>Stuart Minor Benjamin, Ernest A. Young </p>
<p>The California Greenhouse Gas Waiver Decision and Agency Interpretation: A Response to Professors Galle and Seidenfeld</p>
<p>Nina A. Mendelson</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 57    May 2008     Number 7</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Administrative Law&#8217;s Federalism: Preemption, Delegation, and Agencies at the Edge of Federal Power</p>
<p><em>Brian Galle, Mark Seidenfeld</em></p>
<p>Administrative Law as the New Federalism</p>
<p><em>Gillian E. Metzger</p>
<p></em></p>
<p><strong>Essays</strong></p>
<p>Tennis with the Net Down: Administrative Federalism Without Congress</p>
<p><em>Stuart Minor Benjamin, Ernest A. Young </em></p>
<p>The California Greenhouse Gas Waiver Decision and Agency Interpretation: A Response to Professors Galle and Seidenfeld</p>
<p><em>Nina A. Mendelson</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/dljtoc57n7">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal April 2008 Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Nov 2008 01:07:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/duke-law-journal-april-2008-issue.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 57     April 2008     Number 6</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Is It Wrong to Sue for Rape?</p>
<p>Tom Lininger</p>
<p>The Right&#8217;s Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Woman-Protective Anti-Abortion Argument</p>
<p>Reva B. Siegel 	</p>
<p>Economic Foundations of Intellectual Property Rights</p>
<p>Joseph E. Stiglitz</p>
<p>In Defense of Prometheus: Some Ethical, Economic, and Regulatory Issues of Sports Doping</p>
<p>Richard A. Posner</p>
<p>The Problem of Doping</p>
<p>Doriane Lambelet Coleman and James E. Coleman, Jr. 	</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>The Costs of Perceived Hypocrisy: The Impact of U.S. Treatment of Foreign Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises</p>
<p>Destiny Duron Deas</p>
<p>Assessing the Constitutionality of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court</p>
<p>John Dorsett Niles</p>
<p>Cell Phone Ringtones: A Case Study Exemplifying the Complexities of the Section 115 Mechanical License of the Copyright Act of 1976</p>
<p>Daniel M. Simon</p>
<p>The Shadows of Future Generations</p>
<p>Matthew W. Wolfe</p>
<p>Retrieve All Pieces</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 57     April 2008     Number 6</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Is It Wrong to Sue for Rape?</p>
<p><em>Tom Lininger</em></p>
<p>The Right&#8217;s Reasons: Constitutional Conflict and the Spread of Woman-Protective Anti-Abortion Argument</p>
<p><em>Reva B. Siegel 	</em></p>
<p>Economic Foundations of Intellectual Property Rights</p>
<p><em>Joseph E. Stiglitz</em></p>
<p>In Defense of Prometheus: Some Ethical, Economic, and Regulatory Issues of Sports Doping</p>
<p><em>Richard A. Posner</em></p>
<p>The Problem of Doping</p>
<p><em>Doriane Lambelet Coleman </em>and <em>James E. Coleman, Jr. 	</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>The Costs of Perceived Hypocrisy: The Impact of U.S. Treatment of Foreign Acquisitions of Domestic Enterprises</p>
<p><em>Destiny Duron Deas</em></p>
<p>Assessing the Constitutionality of the Alien Terrorist Removal Court</p>
<p><em>John Dorsett Niles</em></p>
<p>Cell Phone Ringtones: A Case Study Exemplifying the Complexities of the Section 115 Mechanical License of the Copyright Act of 1976</p>
<p><em>Daniel M. Simon</em></p>
<p>The Shadows of Future Generations</p>
<p><em>Matthew W. Wolfe</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/journals/dlj/dljtoc57n6">Retrieve All Pieces</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/duke_law_journa_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal, March 2008 Issue</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/08/duke_law_journa_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/08/duke_law_journa_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 03:19:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/08/duke-law-journal-march-2008-issue.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 57     March 2008     Number 5</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Repairing Family Law</p>
<p>Clare Huntington</p>
<p>Paradigms of Restraint</p>
<p>Erin Murphy</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p></p>
<p>Hindsight Is 20/20: Revisiting the Reapportionment Cases to Gain Perspective on Partisan Gerrymanders</p>
<p>Douglass Calidas</p>
<p>From New London to Norwood: A Year in the Life of Eminent Domain</p>
<p>Andrew S. Han</p>
<p>The Siren Song of Interrogational Torture: Evaluating the U.S. Implementation of the U.N. Convention Against Torture</p>
<p>Isaac A. Linnartz</p>
<p>How Reasonable Is &#8220;Reasonable&#8221;? The Search for Satisfactory Approach to Employment Handbooks</p>
<p>Bryce Yoder</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 57     March 2008     Number 5</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+1245">Repairing Family Law</a></p>
<p><em>Clare Huntington</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+1321">Paradigms of Restraint</a></p>
<p><em>Erin Murphy</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+1413"></p>
<p>Hindsight Is 20/20: Revisiting the Reapportionment Cases to Gain Perspective on Partisan Gerrymanders</p>
<p></a><em>Douglass Calidas</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+1449">From New London to Norwood: A Year in the Life of Eminent Domain</a></p>
<p><em>Andrew S. Han</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+1485">The Siren Song of Interrogational Torture: Evaluating the U.S. Implementation of the U.N. Convention Against Torture</a></p>
<p><em>Isaac A. Linnartz</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+1517">How Reasonable Is &#8220;Reasonable&#8221;? The Search for Satisfactory Approach to Employment Handbooks</a></p>
<p><em>Bryce Yoder</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/08/duke_law_journa_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal Vol. 57 Issue 4 (February 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/duke_law_journa_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/duke_law_journa_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 17 May 2008 03:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/05/duke-law-journal-vol-57-issue-4-february-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 57     February 2008     Number 4</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p></p>
<p>Institutions in the Marketplace of Ideas</p>
<p>Joseph Blocher</p>
<p>The Internationalization of Public Interest Law</p>
<p>Scott L. Cummings</p>
<p>Is Secured Debt Used to Redistribute Value from Tort Claimants in Bankruptcy? An Empirical Analysis</p>
<p>Yair Listokin</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p></p>
<p>Regulating Corporations the American Way: Why Exhaustive Rules and Just Deserts Are the Mainstay of U.S. Corporate Governance</p>
<p>Jonas V. Anderson</p>
<p></p>
<p>Court-Ordered Restrictions on Trial Participant Speech</p>
<p>Jonathan Eric Pahl</p>
<p></p>
<p>The Continued Relevance of the Irrelevance-of-Motive Maxim</p>
<p>Michael T. Rosenberg</p>
<p>Freedom to Defraud: Stoneridge, Primary Liability, and the Need to Properly Define Section 10(b)</p>
<p>Travis S. Souza</p>
<p>Rendering Turner Toothless: The Supreme Court&#8217;s Decision in Beard v. Banks</p>
<p>Jennifer N. Wimsatt</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 57     February 2008     Number 4</p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+821"></p>
<p>Institutions in the Marketplace of Ideas</a></p>
<p><em>Joseph Blocher</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+891">The Internationalization of Public Interest Law</a></p>
<p><em>Scott L. Cummings</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+1037">Is Secured Debt Used to Redistribute Value from Tort Claimants in Bankruptcy? An Empirical Analysis</a></p>
<p><em>Yair Listokin</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+1081"></p>
<p>Regulating Corporations the American Way: Why Exhaustive Rules and Just Deserts Are the Mainstay of U.S. Corporate Governance</a></p>
<p><em>Jonas V. Anderson</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+1113"></p>
<p>Court-Ordered Restrictions on Trial Participant Speech</a></p>
<p><em>Jonathan Eric Pahl</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+1143"></p>
<p>The Continued Relevance of the Irrelevance-of-Motive Maxim</a></p>
<p><em>Michael T. Rosenberg</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+1179">Freedom to Defraud: Stoneridge, Primary Liability, and the Need to Properly Define Section 10(b)</a></p>
<p><em>Travis S. Souza</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+1209">Rendering Turner Toothless: The Supreme Court&#8217;s Decision in Beard v. Banks</a></p>
<p><em>Jennifer N. Wimsatt</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/duke_law_journa_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Duke Law Journal, Volume 57, Issue 3 (December 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/duke_law_journa_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/duke_law_journa_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Mar 2008 02:31:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Duke Law Journal</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Duke)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/duke-law-journal-volume-57-issue-3-december-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Volume 57     December 2007     Number 3</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p></p>
<p>The Legal Ethics of Pediatric Research</p>
<p>Doriane Lambelet Coleman</p>
<p>The Competing Paradigms of Securities Regulation</p>
<p>James J. Park</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>The Grand Bargain: Revitalizing Labor through NLRA Reform and Radical Workplace Relations</p>
<p>Michael M. Oswalt </p>
<p>Unionizing NCAA Division I Athletics: A Viable Solution?</p>
<p> Rohith A. Parasuraman</p>
<p></p>
<p>Standing Up to Legislative Bullies: Separation of Powers, State Courts and Educational Rights</p>
<p>Sonja Ralston Elder</p>
<p></p>
<p>Judicial Discretion and the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention Act</p>
<p>Lauren E. Tribble</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Duke-LJ-logo1.jpg"width="529" height="117" /></p>
<p>Volume 57     December 2007     Number 3</p>
<p><strong>Articles</p>
<p></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+517">The Legal Ethics of Pediatric Research</a></p>
<p><em>Doriane Lambelet Coleman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+625">The Competing Paradigms of Securities Regulation</a></p>
<p><em>James J. Park</em></p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+691"></p>
<p>The Grand Bargain: Revitalizing Labor through NLRA Reform and Radical Workplace Relations</a></p>
<p><em>Michael M. Oswalt </em><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+727"></p>
<p>Unionizing NCAA Division I Athletics: A Viable Solution?</a></p>
<p><em> Rohith A. Parasuraman</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+755"></p>
<p>Standing Up to Legislative Bullies: Separation of Powers, State Courts and Educational Rights</a></p>
<p><em>Sonja Ralston Elder</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.law.duke.edu/shell/cite.pl?57+Duke+L.+J.+789"></p>
<p>Judicial Discretion and the Bankruptcy Abuse Prevention Act</a></p>
<p><em>Lauren E. Tribble</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/duke_law_journa_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
