<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Cornell Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/author/Cornell-Law-Review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 23:23:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 95 Number 1 (November 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/cornell-law-review-volume-95-number-1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/cornell-law-review-volume-95-number-1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 15:39:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 95 Number 1 (November 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>The Structural Case for Vertical Maximalism
Tara Leigh Grove</p>
<p>Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory?
Victoria Nourse &#38; Gregory Shaffer</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Evolutionary Theory and the Origin of Property Rights
James E. Krier</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Negative Equity and Purchase-Money Security Interests Under the Uniform Commercial Code and the BAPCPA
Geoffrey M. Collins</p>
<p>An Uncertain Precedent: United States v. Santos and the Possibility of a Legislative Remedy
Evan Ennis</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Current-Issue.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 95 Number 1 (November 2009)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Grove-final.pdf">The Structural Case for Vertical Maximalism</a><br />
<em><span>Tara Leigh Grove</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Nourse-Shaffer-final.pdf">Varieties of New Legal Realism: Can a New World Order Prompt a New Legal Theory?</a><br />
<em><span>Victoria Nourse &amp; Gregory Shaffer</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Essay</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Krier-final.pdf">Evolutionary Theory and the Origin of Property Rights</a><br />
<em><span>James E. Krier</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Notes</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Collins-final.pdf">Negative Equity and Purchase-Money Security Interests Under the Uniform Commercial Code and the BAPCPA</a><br />
<em><span>Geoffrey M. Collins</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Ennis-final.pdf">An Uncertain Precedent: <em><span>United States v. Santos</span></em> and the Possibility of a Legislative Remedy</a><br />
<em><span>Evan Ennis</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/cornell-law-review-volume-95-number-1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 6 (September 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-6-september-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-6-september-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Sep 2009 13:04:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20692</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 6 (September 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>  Taking a Stand on Taking the Stand: The Effect of a Prior Criminal Record on the Decision to Testify and on Trial Outcomes
Theodore Eisenberg &#38; Valerie P. Hans</p>
<p>Identifying Intense Preferences
Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Reducing the Unfair Effects of Nonmutual Issue Preclusion Through Damages Limits
Steven P. Nonkes</p>
<p>Inquiry Notice Gone Awry: A Doctrine Abused in DeBenedictis v. Merrill Lynch
Joseph Robertson</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Current-Issue.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 6 (September 2009)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><span> </span> <a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Eisenberg-Hans-final.pdf">Taking a Stand on Taking the Stand: The Effect of a Prior Criminal Record on the Decision to Testify and on Trial Outcomes</a><br />
<em><span>Theodore Eisenberg &amp; Valerie P. Hans</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Lewinsohn-Zamir-final.pdf">Identifying Intense Preferences</a><br />
<em><span>Daphna Lewinsohn-Zamir</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Notes</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Nonkes-final.pdf">Reducing the Unfair Effects of Nonmutual Issue Preclusion Through Damages Limits</a><br />
<em><span>Steven P. Nonkes</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Robertson-final.pdf">Inquiry Notice Gone Awry: A Doctrine Abused in <em><span>DeBenedictis v. Merrill Lynch</span></em></a><br />
<em><span>Joseph Robertson</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-6-september-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 5 (July 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/08/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-5-july-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/08/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-5-july-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Aug 2009 16:41:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=18813</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 5 (July 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>The Law, Economics and Psychology of Subprime Mortgage Contracts
Oren Bar-Gill</p>
<p>Super Wicked Problems and Climate Change: Restraining the Present to Liberate the Future
Richard J. Lazarus</p>
<p>Regulating Funny: Humor and the Law
Laura E. Little</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Alternate Remedies &#38; The False Claims Act: Protecting Qui Tam Relators in Light of Government Intervention and Criminal Prosecution Decisions
Thomas L. Harris</p>
<p>Defining the Contours of United States v. Hensley: Limiting the Use of Terry Stops for Completed Misdemeanors
Rachel S. Weiss</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Current-Issue.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 5 (July 2009)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Bar-Gill.pdf">The Law, Economics and Psychology of Subprime Mortgage Contracts</a><br />
<em><span>Oren Bar-Gill</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Lazarus.pdf">Super Wicked Problems and Climate Change: Restraining the Present to Liberate the Future</a><br />
<em><span>Richard J. Lazarus</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Little-2.pdf">Regulating Funny: Humor and the Law</a><br />
<em><span>Laura E. Little</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Notes</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Harris-2.pdf">Alternate Remedies &amp; The False Claims Act: Protecting Qui Tam Relators in Light of Government Intervention and Criminal Prosecution Decisions</a><br />
<em><span>Thomas L. Harris</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Weiss-2.pdf">Defining the Contours of <span>United States v. Hensley</span>: Limiting the Use of Terry Stops for Completed Misdemeanors</a><br />
<em><span>Rachel S. Weiss</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/08/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-5-july-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 4 (May 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2009 17:46:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=17023</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p> </p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 4 (May 2009)</p>
<p>SPECIAL ISSUE</p>
<p>Property and Obligation</p>
<p>A Statement of Progressive Property
Gregory S. Alexander, Eduardo M. Peñalver, Joseph William Singer &#38; Laura S. Underkuffler</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>The Social-Obligation Norm in American Property Law
Gregory S. Alexander</p>
<p>Land Virtues
Eduardo M. Peñalver</p>
<p>Responses</p>
<p>Virtue and Rights in American Property Law
Eric R. Claeys</p>
<p>A Few Questions About the Social Obligation Norm
Jedediah Purdy</p>
<p>Mind the Gap: The Indirect Relation Between Ends and Means in American Property Law
Henry E. Smith</p>
<p>Should Property Scholars Drop Economics for Virtue?  A Skeptical Comment
Katrina M. Wyman</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Democratic Estates: Property Law in a Free and Democratic Society
Joseph William Singer</p>
<p>Reply</p>
<p>The Complex Core of Property
Gregory S. Alexander</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;  Normal 0      false false false  EN-US X-NONE X-NONE              MicrosoftInternetExplorer4              &lt;![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;                                                                                                                                             &lt;![endif]--><!--  /* Font Definitions */  @font-face 	{font-family:"Cambria Math"; 	panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4; 	mso-font-charset:0; 	mso-generic-font-family:roman; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1107304683 0 0 159 0;} @font-face 	{font-family:Calibri; 	panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4; 	mso-font-charset:0; 	mso-generic-font-family:swiss; 	mso-font-pitch:variable; 	mso-font-signature:-1610611985 1073750139 0 0 159 0;}  /* Style Definitions */  p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal 	{mso-style-unhide:no; 	mso-style-qformat:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	margin:0in; 	margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:12.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman","serif"; 	mso-fareast-font-family:"Times New Roman";} .MsoChpDefault 	{mso-style-type:export-only; 	mso-default-props:yes; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	mso-ansi-font-size:10.0pt; 	mso-bidi-font-size:10.0pt;} @page Section1 	{size:8.5in 11.0in; 	margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in; 	mso-header-margin:.5in; 	mso-footer-margin:.5in; 	mso-paper-source:0;} div.Section1 	{page:Section1;}  /* List Definitions */  @list l0 	{mso-list-id:792208022; 	mso-list-type:hybrid; 	mso-list-template-ids:504014098 1677865742 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715 67698703 67698713 67698715;} @list l0:level1 	{mso-level-number-format:roman-upper; 	mso-level-tab-stop:.75in; 	mso-level-number-position:left; 	margin-left:.75in; 	text-indent:-.5in;} @list l0:level2 	{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower; 	mso-level-tab-stop:1.0in; 	mso-level-number-position:left; 	text-indent:-.25in;} @list l0:level3 	{mso-level-number-format:roman-lower; 	mso-level-tab-stop:1.5in; 	mso-level-number-position:right; 	text-indent:-9.0pt;} @list l0:level4 	{mso-level-tab-stop:2.0in; 	mso-level-number-position:left; 	text-indent:-.25in;} @list l0:level5 	{mso-level-number-format:alpha-lower; 	mso-level-tab-stop:2.5in; 	mso-level-number-position:left; 	text-indent:-.25in;} ol 	{margin-bottom:0in;} ul 	{margin-bottom:0in;} --><!--[if gte mso 10]&gt; &lt;!   /* Style Definitions */  table.MsoNormalTable 	{mso-style-name:"Table Normal"; 	mso-tstyle-rowband-size:0; 	mso-tstyle-colband-size:0; 	mso-style-noshow:yes; 	mso-style-priority:99; 	mso-style-qformat:yes; 	mso-style-parent:""; 	mso-padding-alt:0in 5.4pt 0in 5.4pt; 	mso-para-margin:0in; 	mso-para-margin-bottom:.0001pt; 	mso-pagination:widow-orphan; 	font-size:10.0pt; 	font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";} --> <!--[endif]--></p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;  Normal 0      false false false  EN-US X-NONE X-NONE              MicrosoftInternetExplorer4              &lt;![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;                                                                                                                                             &lt;![endif]--></p>
<p><img src="/Users/SUSAN-~1/AppData/Local/Temp/moz-screenshot-2.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;  Normal 0     false false false  EN-US X-NONE X-NONE                            &lt;![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]&gt;                                                                                                                                            &lt;![endif]--></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Volume-94-Number-4.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 4 (May 2009)</a></p>
<p>SPECIAL ISSUE</p>
<p><strong>Property and Obligation</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/A-Statement-of-Progressive-Property.pdf">A Statement of Progressive Property</a><br />
<em>Gregory S. Alexander, Eduardo M. Peñalver, Joseph William Singer &amp; Laura S. Underkuffler</em></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/94-4-Alexander-Article.pdf">The Social-Obligation Norm in American Property Law</a><br />
<em>Gregory S. Alexander</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/94-4-Penalver-Article.pdf">Land Virtues</a><br />
<em>Eduardo M. Peñalver</em></p>
<p><strong>Responses</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/94-4-Claeys-Response.pdf">Virtue and Rights in American Property Law</a><br />
<em>Eric R. Claeys</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/94-4-Purdy-Response.pdf">A Few Questions About the Social Obligation Norm</a><br />
<em>Jedediah Purdy</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/94-4-Smith-Response.pdf">Mind the Gap: The Indirect Relation Between Ends and Means in American Property Law</a><br />
<em>Henry E. Smith</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/94-4-Wyman-Response.pdf">Should Property Scholars Drop Economics for Virtue?  A Skeptical Comment</a><br />
<em>Katrina M. Wyman</em></p>
<p><strong>Essay</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/94-4-Singer-Essay.pdf">Democratic Estates: Property Law in a Free and Democratic Society</a><br />
<em>Joseph William Singer</em></p>
<p><strong>Reply</strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/94-4-Alexander-Reply.pdf">The Complex Core of Property</a><br />
<em>Gregory S. Alexander</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/06/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 3 (March 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/cornell_law_rev_7.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/cornell_law_rev_7.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 19:34:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/03/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-3-march-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 3 (March 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Listening to Congress: Earmark Rules and Statutory Interpretation
Rebecca M. Kysar</p>
<p>Judicial Independence in Excess: Reviving the Judicial Duty of the Supreme Court
Paul D. Carrington &#38; Roger C. Cramton

Responses</p>
<p>A Few Thoughts on Judicial Supremacy: A Response to Professors Carrington and Cramton
Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham</p>
<p>Reining in the Superlegislature: A Response to Professors Carrington and Cramton
Daniel J. Meador

Notes</p>
<p>Genocide Funding: The Constitutionality of State Divestment Statutes
Sapna Desai

The Tide Turns: The Changing HIV/AIDS Epidemic and the Criminalization of HIV Exposure
James B. McArthur</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Volume-94-Number-3.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 3 (March 2009)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Kysar-Final.pdf">Listening to Congress: Earmark Rules and Statutory Interpretation</a><br />
<em><span>Rebecca M. Kysar</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Carrington-Cramton-Final.pdf">Judicial Independence in Excess: Reviving the Judicial Duty of the Supreme Court</a><br />
<em><span>Paul D. Carrington &amp; Roger C. Cramton</span></em><br />
<span><br />
<strong>Responses</strong></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Higginbotham-Final-3.pdf">A Few Thoughts on Judicial Supremacy: A Response to Professors Carrington and Cramton</a><br />
<em><span>Honorable Patrick E. Higginbotham</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Meador-Final.pdf">Reining in the Superlegislature: A Response to Professors Carrington and Cramton</a><br />
<em><span>Daniel J. Meador</span></em><br />
<strong><br />
<span>Notes</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Desai-Final.pdf">Genocide Funding: The Constitutionality of State Divestment Statutes</a><br />
<em><span>Sapna Desai</span></em><br />
<a href="https://128.253.118.208/research/cornell-law-review/upload/McArthur-Final.pdf"><br />
</a><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/McArthur-Final.pdf">The Tide Turns: The Changing HIV/AIDS Epidemic and the Criminalization of HIV Exposure</a><br />
<em><span>James B. McArthur</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/03/cornell_law_rev_7.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 2 (January 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/cornell_law_rev_6.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/cornell_law_rev_6.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Jan 2009 17:45:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/01/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-2-january-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 2 (January 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Retributive Damages: A Theory of Punitive Damages as Intermediate Sanction
Dan Markel</p>
<p>The Anti-Corruption Principle
Zephyr Teachout

Notes

Weissman v. National Association of Securities Dealers: A Dangerously Narrow Interpretation of Absolute Immunity for Self-Regulatory Organizations
Andrew J. Cavo</p>
<p>Mandatory Reassignment Under the ADA: The Circuit Split and Need for A Socio-Political Understanding of Disability
Nicholas A. Dorsey

Essay</p>
<p>Pitfalls Ahead: A Manifesto for the Training of Lawyers
Anita Bernstein</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Volume-94-Number-2.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 2 (January 2009)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Markel-final-2.pdf">Retributive Damages: A Theory of Punitive Damages as Intermediate Sanction</a><br />
<em><span>Dan Markel</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Teachout-Final.pdf">The Anti-Corruption Principle</a><br />
<em><span>Zephyr Teachout</span></em><br />
<strong><br />
<span>Notes</span></strong><br />
<em><a href="https://128.253.118.208/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Cavo-Final.pdf"><br />
</a></em><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Cavo-Final.pdf"><em><span>Weissman v. National Association of Securities Dealers</span></em>: A Dangerously Narrow Interpretation of Absolute Immunity for Self-Regulatory Organizations</a><br />
<em><span>Andrew J. Cavo</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Dorsey-Final.pdf">Mandatory Reassignment Under the ADA: The Circuit Split and Need for A Socio-Political Understanding of Disability</a><br />
<em><span>Nicholas A. Dorsey</span></em><br />
<span><br />
<strong>Essay</strong></span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Bernstein-Final.pdf">Pitfalls Ahead: A Manifesto for the Training of Lawyers</a><br />
<em><span>Anita Bernstein</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/01/cornell_law_rev_6.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 1 (November 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/cornell_law_rev_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/cornell_law_rev_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Nov 2008 17:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/cornell-law-review-volume-94-number-1-november-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 1 (November 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Globalizing Commercial Litigation
Jens Dammann &#38; Henry Hansmann

Daniel Defoe and the Written Constitution
Bernadette Meyler</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Big Boy Letters: Trading on Inside Information
Edwin D. Eshmoili</p>
<p>The Offshoring of American Government
Michael A. Zuckerman</p>
<p>Essay

Brown and the Colorblind Constitution
Christopher W. Schmidt</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Current-Issue.cfm"></a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Volume-94-Issue-1.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 94 Number 1 (November 2008)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Dammann-Hansmann-Final.pdf">Globalizing Commercial Litigation</a><br />
<em><span>Jens Dammann &amp; Henry Hansmann</span></em><br />
<a href="https://128.253.118.208/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Meyler-Final.pdf"><br />
</a><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Meyler-Final.pdf">Daniel Defoe and the Written Constitution</a><br />
<em><span>Bernadette Meyler</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Notes</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Eshmoili-Final.pdf">Big Boy Letters: Trading on Inside Information</a><br />
<em><span>Edwin D. Eshmoili</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Zuckerman-Final.pdf">The Offshoring of American Government</a><br />
<em><span>Michael A. Zuckerman</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Essay</span></strong><br />
<a href="https://128.253.118.208/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Schmidt-Final.pdf"><br />
</a><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Schmidt-Final.pdf"><em><span>Brown</span></em> and the Colorblind Constitution</a><br />
<em><span>Christopher W. Schmidt</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/cornell_law_rev_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 6 (September 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/cornell_law_rev_4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/cornell_law_rev_4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Sep 2008 17:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/09/cornell-law-review-volume-93-number-6-september-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 6 (September 2008)</p>
<p>Article </p>
<p>Federal Search Commission?  Access, Fairness, and Accountability in the Law of Search
Oren Bracha &#38; Frank Pasquale </p>
<p>Notes 

Swap Meet: Introducing the Framers to Nader’s Traders Through Porter v. Bowen
Eric J. Finkelstein 

Judging Without the Facts: A Schematic for Reviewing State Secrets Privilege Claims
Michael H. Page </p>
<p>Colloquium</p>
<p>Discussing David Luban&#8217;s Legal Ethics and Human Dignity </p>
<p>Prosecuting the Jena Six
Anthony V. Alfieri </p>
<p>Structure and Integrity
Susan Carle </p>
<p>The Human Dignity of Clients
Katherine R. Kruse </p>
<p>The Past, Present, and Future of Legal Ethics: Three Comments for David Luban
William H. Simon 

The Rule of Law in Action: A Defense of Adversary System Values
Norman W. Spaulding 

Legal Ethics as “Political Moralism” or the Morality of Politics
W. Bradley Wendel </p>
<p>The Inevitability of Conscience: A [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Volume-93-Number-6.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 6 (September 2008)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Article </span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Bracha-Pasquale-Final.pdf">Federal Search Commission?  Access, Fairness, and Accountability in the Law of Search</a><br />
<span><em>Oren Bracha &amp; Frank Pasquale</em> </span></p>
<p><strong><span><span>Notes</span> </span></strong><br />
<a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Finkelstein.pdf"><br />
Swap Meet: Introducing the Framers to Nader’s Traders Through Porter v. Bowen</a><br />
<em><span>Eric J. Finkelstein </span></em><br />
<a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Page.pdf"><br />
Judging Without the Facts: A Schematic for Reviewing State Secrets Privilege Claims</a><br />
<em><span>Michael H. Page </span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Colloquium</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span>Discussing David Luban&#8217;s Legal Ethics and Human Dignity </span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Alfieri.pdf">Prosecuting the Jena Six</a><br />
<em><span>Anthony V. Alfieri </span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Carle.pdf">Structure and Integrity</a><br />
<em><span>Susan Carle </span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Kruse.pdf">The Human Dignity of Clients</a><br />
<em><span>Katherine R. Kruse </span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Simon.pdf">The Past, Present, and Future of Legal Ethics: Three Comments for David Luban</a><br />
<em><span>William H. Simon </span></em><br />
<a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Spaulding.pdf"><br />
The Rule of Law in Action: A Defense of Adversary System Values</a><br />
<em><span>Norman W. Spaulding </span></em><br />
<a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Wendel-2.pdf"><br />
Legal Ethics as “Political Moralism” or the Morality of Politics</a><br />
<em><span>W. Bradley Wendel </span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Luban.pdf">The Inevitability of Conscience: A Response to My Critics</a><br />
<span><em>David Luban </em><br />
</span></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/09/cornell_law_rev_4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 5 (July 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/cornell_law_rev_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/cornell_law_rev_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jul 2008 22:54:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/07/cornell-law-review-volume-93-number-5-july-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 5 (July 2008)</p>
<p>Symposium: U.S. Food and Drug Regulation in its First Century and Beyond</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>The Little Agency that Could (Act with Indifference to Constitutional and Statutory Strictures)
Lars Noah</p>
<p>Dirty Dancing—The FDA Stumbles with the Chevron Two-Step: A Response to Professor Noah
Gary Lawson

Losing Deference in the FDA&#8217;s Second Century: Judicial Review, Politics, and a Diminished Legacy of Expertise
James T. O&#8217;Reilly</p>
<p>The FDA and Deference Lost: A Self-Inflicted Would or the Product of a Wounded Agency?  A Response to Professor O&#8217;Reilly
David C. Vladeck</p>
<p>FDA Regulatory Compliance Reconsidered
Carl Tobias

Great and Lesser Powers of Tort Reform: The Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine and State-Law Claims Concerning FDA-Approved Products
Catherine T. Struve</p>
<p>Drug Review &#8220;Behind the Curtain&#8221;: A Response to Professor Struve
James T. O&#8217;Reilly</p>
<p>Food, Drugs, and Droods: A Historical Consideration of Definitions [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Volume-93-Number-5.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 5 (July 2008)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Symposium: U.S. Food and Drug Regulation in its First Century and Beyond</span></strong></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Noah.pdf">The Little Agency that Could (Act with Indifference to Constitutional and Statutory Strictures)</a><br />
<em><span>Lars Noah</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Lawson.pdf">Dirty Dancing—The FDA Stumbles with the Chevron Two-Step: A Response to Professor Noah</a><br />
<em><span>Gary Lawson</span></em><br />
<a href="https://128.253.118.208/research/cornell-law-review/upload/O-Reilly.pdf"><br />
</a><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/O-Reilly.pdf">Losing Deference in the FDA&#8217;s Second Century: Judicial Review, Politics, and a Diminished Legacy of Expertise</a><br />
<em><span>James T. O&#8217;Reilly</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Vladeck.pdf">The FDA and Deference Lost: A Self-Inflicted Would or the Product of a Wounded Agency?  A Response to Professor O&#8217;Reilly</a><br />
<em><span>David C. Vladeck</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Tobias-2.pdf">FDA Regulatory Compliance Reconsidered</a><br />
<em><span>Carl Tobias</span></em><br />
<a href="https://128.253.118.208/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Struve.pdf"><br />
</a><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Struve.pdf">Great and Lesser Powers of Tort Reform: The Primary Jurisdiction Doctrine and State-Law Claims Concerning FDA-Approved Products</a><br />
<em><span>Catherine T. Struve</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/O-Reilly-Response-2.pdf">Drug Review &#8220;Behind the Curtain&#8221;: A Response to Professor Struve</a><br />
<em><span>James T. O&#8217;Reilly</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Grossman.pdf">Food, Drugs, and Droods: A Historical Consideration of Definitions and Categories in American Food and Drug Law</a><br />
<em><span>Lewis A. Grossman</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/07/cornell_law_rev_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 4 (May 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/cornell_law_rev_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/cornell_law_rev_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 19:33:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/05/cornell-law-review-volume-93-number-4-may-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 4 (May 2008)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Grand Jury Discretion and Constitutional Design
Roger A. Fairfax, Jr.</p>
<p>Can Law Manage Competitive Energy Markets?
David B. Spence</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Striking a Better Public-Private Balance in Forum Non Conveniens
Emily J. Derr</p>
<p>Restitution and the Lacey Act: New Solutions, Old Remedies
Kenneth B. Meyer</p>
<p>Book Review</p>
<p>The Quantitative Moment and the Qualitative Opportunity: Legal Studies of Judicial Decision Making
Gregory C. Sisk</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Volume-93-Number-4.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 4 (May 2008)</a></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/FairfaxGrandJuryDiscretion.pdf">Grand Jury Discretion and Constitutional Design</a><br />
<em><span>Roger A. Fairfax, Jr.</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/SpenceCanLawManage-2.pdf">Can Law Manage Competitive Energy Markets?</a><br />
<em><span>David B. Spence</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Notes</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/DerrStrikingaBetterBalance.pdf">Striking a Better Public-Private Balance in Forum Non Conveniens</a><br />
<em><span>Emily J. Derr</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/MeyerRestitutionandtheLaceyAct.pdf">Restitution and the Lacey Act: New Solutions, Old Remedies</a><br />
<em><span>Kenneth B. Meyer</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Book Review</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Sisk.pdf">The Quantitative Moment and the Qualitative Opportunity: Legal Studies of Judicial</a><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/SpenceCanLawManage.pdf"> </a><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Sisk.pdf"><em>Decision Making</em></a><em><br />
<span>Gregory C. Sisk</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/05/cornell_law_rev_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 3 (March 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/cornell_law_rev_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/cornell_law_rev_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Mar 2008 23:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/cornell-law-review-volume-93-number-3-march-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 3 (March 2008)</p>
<p> </p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>State Courts Unbound
Frederic M. Bloom</p>
<p>Trust Privacy
Frances H. Foster</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Torturous Consequences and the Case of Maher Arar: Can Canadian Solutions &#8220;Cure&#8221; the Due Process Deficiencies in U.S. Removal Proceedings?
Erin Craddock</p>
<p>The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, the Federal Arbitration Act, and the Future of Consumer Protection
Jonathan D. Grossberg</p>
<p>Book Review</p>
<p>Against Judgment
Katherine Y. Barnes</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Volume-93-Number-3.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 3 (March 2008)</a></p>
<p><strong> </strong></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Bloom.pdf">State Courts Unbound</a><br />
<em><span>Frederic M. Bloom</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/FosterTrustPrivacy.pdf">Trust Privacy</a><br />
<em><span>Frances H. Foster</span></em></p>
<p><span><strong>Notes</strong><br />
</span></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/CraddockTorturousConsequences.pdf">Torturous Consequences and the Case of Maher Arar: Can Canadian Solutions &#8220;Cure&#8221; the Due Process Deficiencies in U.S. Removal Proceedings?</a><br />
<em><span>Erin Craddock</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/GrossbergMagnuson.pdf">The Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act, the Federal Arbitration Act, and the Future of Consumer Protection</a><br />
<em><span>Jonathan D. Grossberg</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Book Review</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/BarnesAgainstJudgment.pdf">Against Judgment</a><br />
<em><span>Katherine Y. Barnes</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/cornell_law_rev_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 2 (January 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/18930.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/18930.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Dec 2007 16:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=18930</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p>
Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 2 (January 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Standing, Injury in Fact, and Private Rights
F. Andrew Hessick</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a Wonderful Life
Ronen Perry</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>The Obstruction of Justice Nexus Requirement After Arthur Andersen and Sarbanes-Oxley
Kyle R. Taylor</p>
<p>The Case of the Missing Shareholders: A New Restriction on Honest Services Fraud in United States v. Brown
Douglas Zolkind</p>
<p>Book Review</p>
<p>An Insider&#8217;s Look at the War on Terrorism
Robert F. Turner</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /><br />
<a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/Volume-93-Number-2.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 2 (January 2008)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Hessick.pdf">Standing, Injury in Fact, and Private Rights</a><br />
<em><span>F. Andrew Hessick</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Perry.pdf">It&#8217;s a Wonderful Life</a><br />
<em><span>Ronen Perry</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Notes</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Taylor.pdf">The Obstruction of Justice Nexus Requirement After <span>Arthur Andersen</span> and Sarbanes-Oxley</a><br />
<em><span>Kyle R. Taylor</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Zolkind.pdf">The Case of the Missing Shareholders: A New Restriction on Honest Services Fraud in <span>United States v. Brown</span></a><br />
<em><span>Douglas Zolkind</span></em></p>
<p><strong><span>Book Review</span></strong></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Turner.pdf">An Insider&#8217;s Look at the War on Terrorism</a><br />
<em><span>Robert F. Turner</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/18930.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 1 (November 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/cornell_law_rev.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/cornell_law_rev.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 18:30:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Cornell Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Cornell)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/12/cornell-law-review-volume-93-number-1-november-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 1 (November 2007)</p>
<p>Articles and Responses

Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases
Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski &#38; Andrew J. Wistrich
 
Unleashing the Dogs of War: What the Constitution Means by “Declare War”
Saikrishna Prakash</p>
<p>Making War
Robert J. Delahunty &#38; John Yoo</p>
<p>The President’s Power to Respond to Attacks
Michael D. Ramsey

A Two-Front War
Saikrishna Prakash

Notes

The Requirement for Metadata Production Under Williams V. Sprint/United Management Co.: An Unnecessary Burden for Litigants Engaged in Electronic Discovery
Lucia Cucu</p>
<p>“Respectful Consideration” After Sanchez-Llamas V. Oregon: Why the Supreme Court Owes More to the International Court of Justice
Steven Arrigg Koh</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/cornell2.jpg" alt="cornell2.jpg" width="498" height="66" /></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/93_1.cfm">Cornell Law Review, Volume 93 Number 1 (November 2007)</a></p>
<p><strong><span>Articles and Responses</span></strong><br />
<a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Blinking-on-the-Bench.pdf"><br />
Blinking on the Bench: How Judges Decide Cases</a><br />
<span><em>Chris Guthrie, Jeffrey J. Rachlinski &amp; Andrew J. Wistrich</em><br />
</span> <a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/PrakashUnleashing.pdf"><br />
Unleashing the Dogs of War: What the Constitution Means by “Declare War”</a><br />
<em><span>Saikrishna Prakash</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Delahunty.pdf">Making War</a><br />
<em><span>Robert J. Delahunty &amp; John Yoo</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Ramsey.pdf">The President’s Power to Respond to Attacks</a><br />
<em><span>Michael D. Ramsey</span></em><br />
<a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/A_two_front_war.pdf"><br />
A Two-Front War</a><br />
<em><span>Saikrishna Prakash</span></em><br />
<span><br />
<strong>Notes</strong></span><br />
<a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Metadata-Production.pdf"><br />
The Requirement for Metadata Production Under Williams V. Sprint/United Management Co.: An Unnecessary Burden for Litigants Engaged in Electronic Discovery</a><br />
<em><span>Lucia Cucu</span></em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/research/cornell-law-review/upload/Koh.pdf">“Respectful Consideration” After Sanchez-Llamas V. Oregon: Why the Supreme Court Owes More to the International Court of Justice</a><br />
<em><span>Steven Arrigg Koh</span></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/cornell_law_rev.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
