<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; California Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/author/California-Law-Review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 19:19:59 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>California Law Review, Volume 97 Number 6 (December 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/02/california-law-review-volume-97-number-6-december-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/02/california-law-review-volume-97-number-6-december-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 18:15:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>California Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=25199</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
California Law Review, Volume 97 Number 6 (December 2009)
Articles
<p>Criminal Lying, Prosecutorial Power, and Social Meaning
Lisa Kern Griffin </p>
<p>Harmonization and Its Discontents: A Case Study of  TRIPS Implementation in India&#8217;s Pharmaceutical Sector
Amy Kapczynski </p>
<p>Libertarian Welfarism
Russell Korobkin </p>
Comments
<p>Transgender Legal Advocacy: What Do Feminist Legal Theories Have to Offer?
Demoya R. Gordon</p>
<p>Should Crime Pay?: A Critical Assessment of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996
Matthew Dickman</p>
The Supreme Court of California 2007–2008
<p>Judicial Opinions as Public Rhetoric
Erwin Chemerinsky</p>
<p>Achieving Impartiality in State Courts
Chief Justice Ronald M. George</p>
<p>The Marriage Cases-Reversing the Burden of Inertia in a Pluralist Constitutional Democracy
William M. Eskridge</p>
<p>Rico v. Mitsubishi: The Inadvertent Disclosure of California&#8217;s Flawed Work Product Doctrine
Mark Rumold</p>
<p>Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association: Local Voters, State Propositions, and the Fate of Property Assessments
Michael J. McCarthy</p>
<p>In re Lawrence: Preserving the Possibility of Parole for California Prisoners
Joey Hipolito</p>
<p>In re [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.californialawreview.org/assets/images/clr_logo_concurring.png" alt="" /></p>
<h4><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/23">California Law Review, Volume 97 Number 6 (December 2009)</a></h4>
<h3>Articles</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/criminal-lying-prosecutorial-power-and-social-meaning">Criminal Lying, Prosecutorial Power, and Social Meaning</a><br />
<em>Lisa Kern Griffin</em> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/harmonization-and-its-discontents-a-case-study-of-trips-implementation-in-india-s-pharmaceutical-sector">Harmonization and Its Discontents: A Case Study of  TRIPS Implementation in India&#8217;s Pharmaceutical Sector<br />
</a><em>Amy Kapczynski</em> </p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/libertarian-welfarism">Libertarian Welfarism<br />
</a><em>Russell Korobkin</em> </p>
<h3>Comments</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/transgender-legal-advocacy-what-do-feminist-legal-theories-have-to-offer">Transgender Legal Advocacy: What Do Feminist Legal Theories Have to Offer?</a><br />
<em>Demoya R. Gordon</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/should-crime-pay-a-critical-assessment-of-the-mandatory-victims-restitution-act-of-1996">Should Crime Pay?: A Critical Assessment of the Mandatory Victims Restitution Act of 1996</a><br />
<em>Matthew Dickman</em></p>
<h3>The Supreme Court of California 2007–2008</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/judicial-opinions-as-public-rhetoric">Judicial Opinions as Public Rhetoric</a><br />
<em>Erwin Chemerinsky</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/achieving-impartiality-in-state-courts">Achieving Impartiality in State Courts<br />
</a><em>Chief Justice Ronald M. George</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/the-marriage-cases-reversing-the-burden-of-inertia-in-a-pluralist-constitutional-democracy">The Marriage Cases-Reversing the Burden of Inertia in a Pluralist Constitutional Democracy</a><br />
<em>William M. Eskridge</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/rico-v-mitsubishi-the-inadvertent-disclosure-of-california-s-flawed-work-product-doctrine">Rico v. Mitsubishi: The Inadvertent Disclosure of California&#8217;s Flawed Work Product Doctrine</a><br />
<em>Mark Rumold</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/silicon-valley-taxpayers-association-local-voters-state-propositions-and-the-fate-of-property-assessments">Silicon Valley Taxpayers Association: Local Voters, State Propositions, and the Fate of Property Assessments</a><br />
<em>Michael J. McCarthy</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/in-re-lawrence-preserving-the-possibility-of-parole-for-california-prisoners">In re Lawrence: Preserving the Possibility of Parole for California Prisoners</a><br />
<em>Joey Hipolito</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/in-re-bay-delta-ceqa-decision-adds-certainty-to-water-planning">In re Bay-Delta: CEQA Decision Adds Certainty to Water Planning<br />
</a><em>Jeremy Brown</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/north-coast-women-s-care-california-s-still-undefined-standard-for-protecting-religious-freedom">North Coast Women’s Care: California’s Still-Undefined Standard for Protecting Religious Freedom</a><br />
<em>Sumeet Ajmani</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/02/california-law-review-volume-97-number-6-december-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Law Review, Volume 97 Number 5 (October 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/california-law-review-volume-97-number-5-october-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/california-law-review-volume-97-number-5-october-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 23:47:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>California Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Uncategorized]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22104</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
California Law Review, Volume 97 Number 5 (October 2009)
Comments
<p>Headwinds to a Clean Energy Future: Nuisance Suits Against Wind Energy Projects in the United States 
Stephen Harland Butler</p>
<p>Capital Crime: How California’s Administration of the Death Penalty Violates the Eighth Amendment 
Sara Colón</p>
<p>Full Faith and Credit for Status Records: A Reconsideration of Gardiner 
Shawn Gebhardt</p>
<p>Accountability for Private Military Contractors Under the Alien Tort Statute
Jenny S. Lam</p>
Essays
<p>Assessing California&#8217;s Hybrid Democracy 
Richard L. Hasen</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.californialawreview.org/assets/images/clr_logo_concurring.png" alt="" /></p>
<h4><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/22">California Law Review, Volume 97 Number 5 (October 2009)</a></h4>
<h3>Comments</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/headwinds-to-a-clean-energy-future-nuisance-suits-against-wind-energy-projects-in-the-united-states">Headwinds to a Clean Energy Future: Nuisance Suits Against Wind Energy Projects in the United States </a><br />
<em>Stephen Harland Butler</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/capital-crime-how-california-s-administration-of-the-death-penalty-violates-the-eighth-amendment">Capital Crime: How California’s Administration of the Death Penalty Violates the Eighth Amendment </a><br />
<em>Sara Colón</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/full-faith-and-credit-for-status-records-a-reconsideration-of-i-gardiner-i">Full Faith and Credit for Status Records: A Reconsideration of <em>Gardiner</em> </a><br />
<em>Shawn Gebhardt</em></p>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/accountability-for-private-military-contractors-under-the-alien-tort-statute">Accountability for Private Military Contractors Under the Alien Tort Statute</a><br />
<em>Jenny S. Lam</em></p>
<h3>Essays</h3>
<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/articles/assessing-california-s-hybrid-democracy">Assessing California&#8217;s Hybrid Democracy </a><br />
<em>Richard L. Hasen</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/11/california-law-review-volume-97-number-5-october-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Law Review, Volume 97, Issue 1 (February 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/california_law_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/california_law_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Feb 2009 21:39:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>California Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (California)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/california-law-review-volume-97-issue-1-february-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
Articles
<p>An Estoppel Doctrine for Patented Standards</p>
<p>Robert P. Merges, Jeffrey M. Kuhn</p>
<p>Should Greenhouse Gas Permits Be Allocated on a Per Capita Basis?</p>
<p>Eric A. Posner, Cass R. Sunstein</p>
<p>The Federal Courts as a Franchise: Rethinking the Justifications for Federal Question Jurisdiction</p>
<p>Gil Seinfeld</p>
Comments
<p>No Way Out: An Analysis of Exit Processes for Gang Injunctions</p>
<p>Lindsay Crawford</p>
<p>Enterprise Liability: Reviewing and Revitalizing Liability for Corporate Groups</p>
<p>Meredith Dearborn</p>
Essays
<p>Against Moral Rights</p>
<p>Amy M. Adler</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org"><img alt="Cal-logo2.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Cal-logo2.jpg" width="310" height="110" /></a></p>
<h3>Articles</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/09Feb_Merges.pdf">An Estoppel Doctrine for Patented Standards</a></strong></p>
<p><i>Robert P. Merges, Jeffrey M. Kuhn</i></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/09Feb_Posner.pdf">Should Greenhouse Gas Permits Be Allocated on a Per Capita Basis?</a></strong></p>
<p><i>Eric A. Posner, Cass R. Sunstein</i></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/09Feb_Seinfeld.pdf">The Federal Courts as a Franchise: Rethinking the Justifications for Federal Question Jurisdiction</a></strong></p>
<p><i>Gil Seinfeld</i></p>
<h3>Comments</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/09Feb_Crawford.pdf">No Way Out: An Analysis of Exit Processes for Gang Injunctions</a></strong></p>
<p><i>Lindsay Crawford</i></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/09Feb_Dearborn.pdf">Enterprise Liability: Reviewing and Revitalizing Liability for Corporate Groups</a></strong></p>
<p><i>Meredith Dearborn</i></p>
<h3>Essays</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org/issues/09Feb_Adler.pdf">Against Moral Rights</a></strong></p>
<p><i>Amy M. Adler</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/california_law_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Law Review, Volume 96, Issue 6 (December 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/california_law_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/california_law_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 04 Feb 2009 01:05:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>California Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (California)]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/california-law-review-volume-96-issue-6-december-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Articles
<p>Keeping Imports Safe: A Proposal for Discriminatory Regulation of International Trade	</p>
<p>Kenneth A. Bamberger, Andrew T. Guzman</p>
<p>Virginity Testing and South Africa&#8217;s HIV/AIDS Crisis: Beyond Rights Universalism and Cultural Relativism Toward Health Capabilities 	</p>
<p> Erika R. George </p>
<p>Mourning Miranda</p>
<p> Charles D. Weisselberg </p>
Comments
<p>Learning from the Recent Interpretation of INA Section 245(a): Factors to Consider When Interpreting Immigration Law</p>
<p> Mayte Santacruz Benavidez  </p>
<p>An Analysis of Current Whistleblower Laws:Defending a More Flexible Approach to Reporting Requirements</p>
<p> Gerard Sinzdak  </p>
Essays
<p>Critical Inquiry: A Tool for Protecting the Dissident Professor&#8217;s Academic Freedom</p>
<p> Jennifer Elrod </p>
<p>The Myth of International Delegation</p>
<p> Andrew T. Guzman, Jennifer Landsidle </p>
<p>&#160;</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.californialawreview.org"><img alt="Cal-logo2.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Cal-logo2.jpg" width="310" height="110" /></a></p>
<p><h3>Articles</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_Bamberger.pdf">Keeping Imports Safe: A Proposal for Discriminatory Regulation of International Trade</a></strong>	</p>
<p><i>Kenneth A. Bamberger, Andrew T. Guzman</i></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_George.pdf">Virginity Testing and South Africa&#8217;s HIV/AIDS Crisis: Beyond Rights Universalism and Cultural Relativism Toward Health Capabilities</a></strong> 	</p>
<p><i> Erika R. George </i></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_Weisselberg.pdf">Mourning Miranda</a></strong></p>
<p><i> Charles D. Weisselberg </i></p>
<h3>Comments</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_Santacruz.pdf">Learning from the Recent Interpretation of INA Section 245(a): Factors to Consider When Interpreting Immigration Law</a></strong></p>
<p><i> Mayte Santacruz Benavidez </i> </p>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_Sinzdak.pdf">An Analysis of Current Whistleblower Laws:Defending a More Flexible Approach to Reporting Requirements</a></strong></p>
<p><i> Gerard Sinzdak </i> </p>
<h3>Essays</h3>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_Elrod.pdf">Critical Inquiry: A Tool for Protecting the Dissident Professor&#8217;s Academic Freedom</a></strong></p>
<p><i> Jennifer Elrod </i></p>
<p><strong><a href="http://californialawreview.org/issues/08Dec_Guzman.pdf">The Myth of International Delegation</a></strong></p>
<p><i> Andrew T. Guzman, Jennifer Landsidle </i></p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/california_law_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Law Review, Volume 96:5 (October 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/california_law_review_volume_965_october_2008.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/california_law_review_volume_965_october_2008.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Oct 2008 23:59:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>California Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (California)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/california-law-review-volume-965-october-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>SYMPOSIUM: TAKING INITIATIVE ON INITIATIVES: EXAMINING PROPOSITION 209 AND BEYOND
Articles
<p>The New Racial Preferences	</p>
<p>Devon W. Carbado and Cheryl I. Harris</p>
<p>Race as a Diagnostic Tool: Latinas/os and Higher Education in California, Post-209 	</p>
<p>Jennifer M. Chacón</p>
<p>A Handicapped, Not “Sleeping,” Giant: The Devastating Impact of the Initiative Process on Latina/o and Immigrant Communities</p>
<p>Kevin R. Johnson</p>
<p>Cracking the Egg: Which Came First — Stigma or Affirmative Action?</p>
<p>Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Emily Houh,  Mary Campbell</p>
Comment
<p>Imprisoning Right: The Failure of Negotiated Governance in the Prison Inmate Grievance Process</p>
<p>Van Swearingen </p>
Remarks
<p>The First Justice Harlan</p>
<p>Goodwin Liu</p>
<p>Equal Rites and Equal Rights</p>
<p>Melissa Murray</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Cal-logo2.jpg"</p>
<p>src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Cal-logo2.jpg"</p>
<p>width="310" height="110" /></p>
<p><h3>SYMPOSIUM: TAKING INITIATIVE ON INITIATIVES: EXAMINING PROPOSITION 209 AND BEYOND</h3>
<h3>Articles</h3>
<p><strong>The New Racial Preferences</strong>	</p>
<p><i>Devon W. Carbado and Cheryl I. Harris</i></p>
<p><strong>Race as a Diagnostic Tool: Latinas/os and Higher Education in California, Post-209</strong> 	</p>
<p><i>Jennifer M. Chacón</i></p>
<p><strong>A Handicapped, Not “Sleeping,” Giant: The Devastating Impact of the Initiative Process on Latina/o and Immigrant Communities</strong></p>
<p><i>Kevin R. Johnson</i></p>
<p><strong>Cracking the Egg: Which Came First — Stigma or Affirmative Action?</strong></p>
<p><i>Angela Onwuachi-Willig, Emily Houh,  Mary Campbell</i></p>
<h3>Comment</h3>
<p><strong>Imprisoning Right: The Failure of Negotiated Governance in the Prison Inmate Grievance Process</strong></p>
<p><i>Van Swearingen</i> </p>
<h3>Remarks</h3>
<p><strong>The First Justice Harlan</strong></p>
<p><i>Goodwin Liu</i></p>
<p><strong>Equal Rites and Equal Rights</strong></p>
<p><i>Melissa Murray</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/california_law_review_volume_965_october_2008.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>California Law Review, Volume 95, Issue 5 (October 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/california_law.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/california_law.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>California Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (California)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/12/california-law-review-volume-95-issue-5-october-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Symposium: Race, Economic Justice, and Community Lawyering in the New Century</p>
<p>ARTICLES</p>
<p>Introduction: Lawyers and Community Economic Development</p>
<p>William H. Simon</p>
<p>Faith in Community: Representing “Colored Town”	</p>
<p>Anthony V. Alfieri</p>
<p>Public Interest Lawyers and Resistance Movements</p>
<p>Sameer M. Ashar</p>
<p></p>
<p>Law in the Labor Movement’s Challenge to Wal-Mart: A Case Study of the Inglewood Site Fight</p>
<p>Scott L. Cummings</p>
<p>Integrative Lawyering: Navigating the Political Economy of Urban Development</p>
<p>Shelia R. Foster and Brian Glick</p>
<p>From “The Art of War” to “Being Peace”: Mindfulness and Community Lawyering in the Neoliberal Age</p>
<p>Angela Harris, Margaretta Lin, and Jeff Selbin</p>
<p></p>
<p>Concluding Essay: The Lawyer is not the Protagonist: Community Campaigns, Law, and Social Change</p>
<p>Jennifer Gordon</p>
<p>COMMENT</p>
<p>Putative Partners: Protecting Couples from the Consequences of Technically Invalid Domestic Partnerships</p>
<p>Ben Johnson</p>
<p>We are currently in the process of redesigning our website. PDF versions of the articles will be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="Cal-logo2.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/Cal-logo2.jpg" width="310" height="110" /></p>
<p><strong>Symposium: Race, Economic Justice, and Community Lawyering in the New Century</p>
<p></strong><strong>ARTICLES</strong></p>
<p><strong>Introduction: Lawyers and Community Economic Development</strong></p>
<p><em>William H. Simon</em></p>
<p><strong>Faith in Community: Representing “Colored Town”	</strong></p>
<p><em>Anthony V. Alfieri</em></p>
<p><strong>Public Interest Lawyers and Resistance Movements</strong></p>
<p><em>Sameer M. Ashar</em></p>
<p><strong></p>
<p>Law in the Labor Movement’s Challenge to Wal-Mart: A Case Study of the Inglewood Site Fight</strong></p>
<p><em>Scott L. Cummings</em></p>
<p><strong>Integrative Lawyering: Navigating the Political Economy of Urban Development</strong></p>
<p><em>Shelia R. Foster and Brian Glick</em></p>
<p><strong>From “The Art of War” to “Being Peace”: Mindfulness and Community Lawyering in the Neoliberal Age</strong></p>
<p><em>Angela Harris, Margaretta Lin, and Jeff Selbin</em></p>
<p><strong></p>
<p>Concluding Essay: The Lawyer is not the Protagonist: Community Campaigns, Law, and Social Change</strong></p>
<p><em>Jennifer Gordon</em></p>
<p><strong>COMMENT</strong></p>
<p><strong>Putative Partners: Protecting Couples from the Consequences of Technically Invalid Domestic Partnerships</strong></p>
<p><em>Ben Johnson</em></p>
<p>We are currently in the process of redesigning our website. PDF versions of the articles will be available in the future.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/california_law.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
