<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Boston College Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/author/Boston-College-Law-Review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 21 Nov 2009 02:51:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.3</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:4 (September 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-504-september-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-504-september-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:4 (September 2009)
</p>
<p>Remarks
</p>
<p>Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, Flexibility and Optimism in an Unpredictable World, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 941 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>Miriam Hechler Baer, Governing Corporate Compliance, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 949 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Lawrence A. Hamermesh &#38; Michael L. Wachter, Rationalizing Appraisal Standards in Compulsory Buyouts, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1021 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Carissa Byrne Hessick, Ineffective Assistance at Sentencing, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1069 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Gary Lawson &#38; Robert D. Sloane, The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico&#8217;s Legal Status Reconsidered, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1123 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Jesse H. Alderman, Crying Wolf: The Unlawful Delisting of Northern Rocky Mountain Gray Wolves from Endangered Species Act Protections, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1195 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Adam M. Leamon, Section 108 of the I.R.C. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg" alt="Boston College Law Review Logo" /></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:4 (September 2009)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Remarks</b>
</p>
<p>Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, <i>Flexibility and Optimism in an Unpredictable World</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 941 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/01_bernanke.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Miriam Hechler Baer, <i>Governing Corporate Compliance</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 949 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/02_baer.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Lawrence A. Hamermesh &amp; Michael L. Wachter, <i>Rationalizing Appraisal Standards in Compulsory Buyouts</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1021 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/03_hamermesh%20%26%20wachter.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Carissa Byrne Hessick, <i>Ineffective Assistance at Sentencing</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1069 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/04_hessick.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Gary Lawson &amp; Robert D. Sloane, <i>The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico&#8217;s Legal Status Reconsidered</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1123 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/05_lawson-sloane.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Jesse H. Alderman, <i>Crying Wolf: The Unlawful Delisting of Northern Rocky Mountain Gray Wolves from Endangered Species Act Protections</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1195 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/06_alderman.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Adam M. Leamon, <i>Section 108 of the I.R.C. and the Inclusion of </i>Tufts<i> Gain: A Proposal for Reform</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1243 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/07_leamon.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Caitlin M. Mulligan, <i>From AAA to F: How the Credit Rating Agencies Failed America and What Can Be Done to Protect Investors</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1275 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/08_mulligan.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-504-september-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:3 (May 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-503-may-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-503-may-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:3 (May 2009)
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>William K. Sjostrom, Jr., Carving a New Path to Equity Capital and Share Liquidity, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 639 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Brian Z. Tamanaha, The Distorting Slant in Quantitative Studies of Judging, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 685 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Suja A. Thomas, The Fallacy of Dispositive Procedure, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 759 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Bruce J. Winick, The Supreme Court&#8217;s Evolving Death Penalty Jurisprudence: Severe Mental Illness as the Next Frontier, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 785 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Reagan S. Bissonnette, Reasonably Accommodating Nonmitigating Plaintiffs After the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 859 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>James D. Myers, Bringing the Vice President into the Fold: Executive Immunity and the Vice Presidency, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 897 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Contents of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"/></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:3 (May 2009)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>William K. Sjostrom, Jr., <i>Carving a New Path to Equity Capital and Share Liquidity</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 639 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/01_sjostrom.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Brian Z. Tamanaha, <i>The Distorting Slant in Quantitative Studies of Judging</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 685 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/02_tamanaha.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Suja A. Thomas, <i>The Fallacy of Dispositive Procedure</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 759 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/03_thomas.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Bruce J. Winick, <i>The Supreme Court&#8217;s Evolving Death Penalty Jurisprudence: Severe Mental Illness as the Next Frontier</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 785 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/04_winick.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Reagan S. Bissonnette, <i>Reasonably Accommodating Nonmitigating Plaintiffs After the ADA Amendments Act of 2008</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 859 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/05_bissonette.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>James D. Myers, <i>Bringing the Vice President into the Fold: Executive Immunity and the Vice Presidency</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 897 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/06_myers.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-503-may-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:2 (March 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/boston_college_7.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/boston_college_7.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/04/boston-college-law-review-issue-502-march-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:2 (March 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Kimberly Jenkins Robinson, The Constitutional Future of Race-Neutral Efforts to Achieve Diversity and Avoid Racial Isolation in Elementary and Secondary Schools, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 277 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p> Fabio Arcila, Jr., The Framers&#8217; Search Power: The Misunderstood Statutory History of Suspicion &#038; Probable Cause, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 363 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Margit Livingston, Inspiration or Imitation: Copyright Protection for Stage Directions, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 427 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Mark S. Stein, Nussbaum: A Utilitarian Critique, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 489 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Kristen MacIsaac, Medicare&#8217;s August Rule: Necessary Step Toward Minimizing Federal Spending or Overbroad Decision Leading to Higher Malpractice Costs?, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 533 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Jacob Tabor, Students&#8217; First Amendment Rights in the Age of the Internet: Off-Campus Cyberspeech [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:2 (March 2009)</b></p>
<p><b>Articles</b></p>
<p>Kimberly Jenkins Robinson, <i>The Constitutional Future of Race-Neutral Efforts to Achieve Diversity and Avoid Racial Isolation in Elementary and Secondary Schools</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 277 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/01_robinson.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p> Fabio Arcila, Jr., <i>The Framers&#8217; Search Power: The Misunderstood Statutory History of Suspicion &#038; Probable Cause</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 363 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/02_arcila.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Margit Livingston, <i>Inspiration or Imitation: Copyright Protection for Stage Directions</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 427 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/03_livingston.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Essay</b></p>
<p>Mark S. Stein, <i>Nussbaum: A Utilitarian Critique</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 489 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/04_stein.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Notes</b></p>
<p>Kristen MacIsaac, <i>Medicare&#8217;s August Rule: Necessary Step Toward Minimizing Federal Spending or Overbroad Decision Leading to Higher Malpractice Costs?</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 533 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/05_macisaac.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Jacob Tabor, <i>Students&#8217; First Amendment Rights in the Age of the Internet: Off-Campus Cyberspeech and School Regulation</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 561 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/06_tabor.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Peter Tipps, <i>Controlling the Lead Paint Debate: Why Control Is Not an Element of Public Nuisance</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 605 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/07_tipps.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/boston_college_7.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:1 (January 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/boston_college_6.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/boston_college_6.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/boston-college-law-review-issue-501-january-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:1 (January 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Elena Baylis, Reassessing the Role of International Criminal Law: Rebuilding National Courts Through Transnational Networks, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Adam Candeub, An Economic Theory of Criminal Excuse, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 87 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>David Fagundes, Crystals in the Public Domain, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 139 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Emily Barbour, Separate and Invisible: Alternative Education Programs and Our Educational Rights, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 197 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Tim Castelli, Not Guilty by Association: Why the Taint of Their &#8220;Blank Check&#8221; Predecessors Should Not Stunt the Growth of Modern Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 237 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Contents of current and past issues are available at our website.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:1 (January 2009)</b></p>
<p><b>Articles</b></p>
<p>Elena Baylis, <i>Reassessing the Role of International Criminal Law: Rebuilding National Courts Through Transnational Networks</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/02_baylis.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Adam Candeub, <i>An Economic Theory of Criminal Excuse</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 87 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/03_candeub.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>David Fagundes, <i>Crystals in the Public Domain</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 139 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/04_fagundes.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Notes</b></p>
<p>Emily Barbour, <i>Separate and Invisible: Alternative Education Programs and Our Educational Rights</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 197 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/05_barbour.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Tim Castelli, <i>Not Guilty by Association: Why the Taint of Their &#8220;Blank Check&#8221; Predecessors Should Not Stunt the Growth of Modern Special Purpose Acquisition Companies</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 237 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/06_castelli.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/boston_college_6.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:5 (November 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/boston_college_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/boston_college_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/boston-college-law-review-issue-495-november-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:5 (November 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Marc O. DeGirolami, The Problem of Religious Learning, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1213 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Ruth Mason, Made in America for European Tax: The International Consistency Test, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1277 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Richard E. Myers II, Responding to the Time-Base Failures of the Criminal Law Through a Criminal Sunset Amendment, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1327 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p> Douglas G. Smith, The Constitutionality of Civil Commitment and the Requirement of Adequate Treatment, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1383 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Note</p>
<p>Michael K. Avery, Whose Rights? Why States Should Set the Parameters for Federal Honest Services Mail and Wire Fraud Protections, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1431 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Contents of current and past issues are available at our website.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 49:5 (November 2008)</b></p>
<p><b>Articles</b></p>
<p>Marc O. DeGirolami, <i>The Problem of Religious Learning</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1213 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/01_degirolami.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Ruth Mason, <i>Made in America for European Tax: The International Consistency Test</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1277 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/02_mason.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Richard E. Myers II, <i>Responding to the Time-Base Failures of the Criminal Law Through a Criminal Sunset Amendment</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1327 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/03_myers.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p> Douglas G. Smith, <i>The Constitutionality of Civil Commitment and the Requirement of Adequate Treatment</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1383 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/04_smith.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Note</b></p>
<p>Michael K. Avery, <i>Whose Rights? Why States Should Set the Parameters for Federal Honest Services Mail and Wire Fraud Protections</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1431 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/05_avery.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/boston_college_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:4 (September 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/boston_college_4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/boston_college_4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/boston-college-law-review-issue-494-september-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:4 (September 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Donald G. Gifford, Impersonating the Legislature: State Attorneys General and Parens Patriae Product Litigation, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 913 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Thomas A. Piraino, Jr., The Antitrust Implications of &#8220;Going Private&#8221; and Other Changes of Corporate Control, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 971 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Mark DeFeo, Unlocking the iPhone: How Antitrust Law Can Save Consumers from the Inadequacies of Copyright Law, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1037 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Michael Kaneb, Neither Realistic Nor Constitutionally Sound: The Problem of the FCC&#8217;s Community Standard for Broadcast Indecency Determinations, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1081 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Daniel McFadden, A First Amendment Analysis of Military Regulations Restricting the Wearing of Military Uniforms by Members of the Individual Ready Reserve Who Participate in Politically Themed Theatrical Productions, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em></strong><strong>, Issue 49:4 (September 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Donald G. Gifford, <em>Impersonating the Legislature: State Attorneys General and Parens Patriae Product Litigation</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 913 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/01_gifford_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Thomas A. Piraino, Jr., <em>The Antitrust Implications of &#8220;Going Private&#8221; and Other Changes of Corporate Control</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 971 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/02_piraino_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Mark DeFeo, <em>Unlocking the iPhone: How Antitrust Law Can Save Consumers from the Inadequacies of Copyright Law</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1037 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/03_defeo_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Michael Kaneb, <em>Neither Realistic Nor Constitutionally Sound: The Problem of the FCC&#8217;s Community Standard for Broadcast Indecency Determinations</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1081 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/04_kaneb_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Daniel McFadden, <em>A First Amendment Analysis of Military Regulations Restricting the Wearing of Military Uniforms by Members of the Individual Ready Reserve Who Participate in Politically Themed Theatrical Productions</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1131 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/05_mcfadden_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Kevin J. O&#8217;Brien, <em>Federal Regulation of State Employment Under the Commerce Clause and &#8220;National Defense&#8221; Powers: Constitutional Issues Presented by the Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1175 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/06_o%27brien_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available on our website.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/boston_college_4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:3 (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/boston_college_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/boston_college_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/04/boston-college-law-review-issue-493-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:3 (May 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Steven A. Dean, The Incomplete Global Market for Tax Information, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 605 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Jonathan Remy Nash, Economic Efficiency Versus Public Choice: The Case of Property Rights in Road Traffic Management, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 673 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Katherine J. Strandburg, Freedom of Association in a Networked World: First Amendment Regulation of Relational Surveillance, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 741 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Jonathan K. Geldert, Presidential Advisors and Their Most Unpresidential Activities: Why Executive Privilege Cannot Shield White House Information in the U.S. Attorney Firings Controversy, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 823 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>John A. Kupiec, Returning to Principles of &#8220;Fairness and Justice&#8221;: The Role of Investment-Backed Expectations in Total Regulatory Taking Claims, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 865 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Contents [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BC-logo2.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"width="479" height="149" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em>, Issue 49:3 (May 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Steven A. Dean, <em>The Incomplete Global Market for Tax Information</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 605 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/01_dean_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Jonathan Remy Nash, <em>Economic Efficiency Versus Public Choice: The Case of Property Rights in Road Traffic Management</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 673 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/02_nash_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Katherine J. Strandburg, <em>Freedom of Association in a Networked World: First Amendment Regulation of Relational Surveillance</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 741 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/03_strandburg_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Jonathan K. Geldert, <em>Presidential Advisors and Their Most Unpresidential Activities: Why Executive Privilege Cannot Shield White House Information in the U.S. Attorney Firings Controversy</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 823 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/04_geldert_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>John A. Kupiec, <em>Returning to Principles of &#8220;Fairness and Justice&#8221;: The Role of Investment-Backed Expectations in Total Regulatory Taking Claims</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 865 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/05_kupiec_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/boston_college_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:2 (March 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/boston_college_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/boston_college_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/boston-college-law-review-issue-492-march-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:2 (March 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Jonathan H. Adler, Money or Nothing: The Adverse Environmental Consequences of Uncompensated Land Use Controls, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 301 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Nancy Levit, Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>A. Benjamin Spencer, Plausibility Pleading, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 431 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Courtney P. Fain, What’s in a Name? The Worrisome Interchange of Juvenile “Adjudications” with Criminal “Convictions”, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 495 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Jessica L. Lambert, Developing a Legal Framework for Resolving Disputes Between “Adoptive Parents” of Frozen Embryos: A Comparison to Resolutions of Divorce Disputes Between Progenitors, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 529 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>William Trunk, The Scourge of Contextualism: Ceremonial Deism and the Establishment Clause, 49 B.C. L. Rev. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BC-logo2.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"width="479" height="149" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em>, Issue 49:2 (March 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Jonathan H. Adler, <em>Money or Nothing: The Adverse Environmental Consequences of Uncompensated Land Use Controls</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 301 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/01_adler.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Nancy Levit, <em>Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/02_levit.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>A. Benjamin Spencer, <em>Plausibility Pleading</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 431 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/03_spencer.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Courtney P. Fain, <em>What’s in a Name? The Worrisome Interchange of Juvenile “Adjudications” with Criminal “Convictions”</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 495 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/04_fain.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Jessica L. Lambert, <em>Developing a Legal Framework for Resolving Disputes Between “Adoptive Parents” of Frozen Embryos: A Comparison to Resolutions of Divorce Disputes Between Progenitors</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 529 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/05_lambert.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>William Trunk, <em>The Scourge of Contextualism: Ceremonial Deism and the Establishment Clause</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 571 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/06_trunk.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website</p>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/boston_college_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:1 (January 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/boston_college.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/boston_college.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/12/boston-college-law-review-issue-491-january-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:1 (January 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Michael L. Seigel, Corporate America Fights Back: The Battle over Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Jacqueline D. Lipton, Who Owns “Hillary.com”? Political Speech and the First Amendment in Cyberspace, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 55 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Dru Stevenson, Entrapment and Terrorism, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 125 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Rebecca A. Kiselewich, In Defense of the 2006 Title IX Regulations for Single-Sex Public Education: How Separate Can Be Equal, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 217 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Melissa Whitney, The Statistical Evidence of Racial Profiling in Traffic Stops and Searches: Rethinking the Use of Statistics to Prove Discriminatory Intent, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 263 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Contents of current and past issues are available at our website</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BC-logo2.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"width="479" height="149" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em>, Issue 49:1 (January 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Michael L. Seigel, <em>Corporate America Fights Back: The Battle over Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/01_seigel_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Jacqueline D. Lipton, <em>Who Owns “Hillary.com”? Political Speech and the First Amendment in Cyberspace</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 55 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/02_lipton_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Dru Stevenson, <em>Entrapment and Terrorism</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 125 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/03_stevenson_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Rebecca A. Kiselewich,<em> In Defense of the 2006 Title IX Regulations for Single-Sex Public Education: How Separate Can Be Equal</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 217 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/04_kiselewich_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Melissa Whitney, <em>The Statistical Evidence of Racial Profiling in Traffic Stops and Searches: Rethinking the Use of Statistics to Prove Discriminatory Intent</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 263 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/05_whitney_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/boston_college.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 48:5 (November 2007)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/boston_college_1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/boston_college_1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Nov 2007 19:27:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/11/boston-college-law-review-issue-485-november-2007.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 48:5 (November 2007)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Mary J. Davis, The Battle over Implied Preemption: Products Liability &#038; the FDA, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1089 (2007) [PDF]</p>
<p>Christine A. Klein, The New Nuisance: An Antidote to Wetland Loss, Sprawl, and Global Warming, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1155 (2007) [PDF]</p>
<p>Adam N. Steinman, Reinventing Appellate Jurisdiction, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1237 (2007) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Rebecca L. Puskas, Measure 37’s Federal Law Exception: A Critical Protection for Oregon’s Federally Approved Land Use Laws, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1301 (2007) [PDF]</p>
<p>Adam Mueller, The Implications of Legislative Power: State Constitutions, State Legislatures, and Mid-Decade Redistricting, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1343 (2007) [PDF]</p>
<p>Julie Roman Lackner, The Evolution and Future of Substantial Nexus in State Taxation of Corporate Income, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1387 (2007) [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BC-logo2.jpg" src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg" width="479" height="149" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em>, Issue 48:5 (November 2007)</strong></a></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Mary J. Davis, <em>The Battle over Implied Preemption: Products Liability &#038; the FDA</em>, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1089 (2007) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/48_5/01_davis_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Christine A. Klein, <em>The New Nuisance: An Antidote to Wetland Loss, Sprawl, and Global Warming</em>, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1155 (2007) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/48_5/02_klein_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Adam N. Steinman, <em>Reinventing Appellate Jurisdiction</em>, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1237 (2007) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/48_5/03_steinman_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Rebecca L. Puskas, <em>Measure 37’s Federal Law Exception: A Critical Protection for Oregon’s Federally Approved Land Use Laws</em>, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1301 (2007) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/48_5/04_livermore-puskas_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Adam Mueller, <em>The Implications of Legislative Power: State Constitutions, State Legislatures, and Mid-Decade Redistricting</em>, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1343 (2007) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/48_5/05_mueller_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Julie Roman Lackner, <em>The Evolution and Future of Substantial Nexus in State Taxation of Corporate Income</em>, 48 B.C. L. Rev. 1387 (2007) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/48_5/06_roman-lackner_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/11/boston_college_1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
