<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Concurring Opinions &#187; Boston College Law Review</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/author/Boston-College-Law-Review/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com</link>
	<description>The Law, the Universe, and Everything</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2012 00:27:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:5 (November 2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/11/boston-college-law-review-issue-525-november-2011.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/11/boston-college-law-review-issue-525-november-2011.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2011 20:47:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=53638</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:5 (November 2011)
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>Thomas P. Crocker, Presidential Power and Constitutional Responsibility, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1551 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Babette E.L. Boliek, FCC Regulation Versus Antitrust: How Net Neutrality is Defining the Boundaries, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 685 (2011) 1627 [PDF]
</p>
<p>Bryan Clark &#38; Amanda C. Leiter, Regulatory Hide and Seek: What Agencies Can (and Can&#8217;t) Do to Limit Judicial Review, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1687 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Brendan S. Maher, The Benefits of Opt-in Federalism, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1733 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Vincent Chiappini, How American Are American Depository Receipts? ADRs, Rule 10b-5 Suits, and Morrison v. National Australia Bank, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1795 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Randall L. Newsom, Cease and Desist: Finding an Equitable Solution in Trademark Disputes Between High Schools and Colleges, 52 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg" /></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 52:5 (November 2011)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Thomas P. Crocker, <i>Presidential Power and Constitutional Responsibility</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1551 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_5/01_crocker.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Babette E.L. Boliek, <i>FCC Regulation Versus Antitrust: How Net Neutrality is Defining the Boundaries</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 685 (2011) 1627 [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_5/02_boliek.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Bryan Clark &amp; Amanda C. Leiter, <i>Regulatory Hide and Seek: What Agencies Can (and Can&#8217;t) Do to Limit Judicial Review</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1687 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_5/03_leiter%20and%20clark.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Brendan S. Maher, <i>The Benefits of Opt-in Federalism</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1733 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_5/04_maher.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Vincent Chiappini, <i>How American Are American Depository Receipts? ADRs, Rule 10b-5 Suits, and </i>Morrison v. National Australia Bank<i></i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1795 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_5/05_chiappini.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Randall L. Newsom, <i>Cease and Desist: Finding an Equitable Solution in Trademark Disputes Between High Schools and Colleges</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1833 (2011) [<a>PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Kevin C. Quigley, <i>Uncorking </i>Granholm<i>: Extending the Nondiscrimination Principle to All Interstate Commerce in Wine</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1871 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_5/07_quigley.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Eli R. Shindelman, <i>Time for the Court to Become &#8220;Intimate&#8221; with Surveillance Technology</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1909 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_5/08_shindelman.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/11/boston-college-law-review-issue-525-november-2011.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:4 (September 2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-524-september-2011.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-524-september-2011.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Sep 2011 12:54:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=51308</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:4 (September 2011)
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>Gregory C. Shaffer &#38; Mark A. Pollack, Hard Versus Soft Law in International Security, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1147 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Roger A. Fairfax, Jr., Prosecutorial Nullification, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 685 (2011) 7243 [PDF]
</p>
<p>Michael Grynberg, The Judicial Role in Trademark Law, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1283 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Laura A. Heymann, The Law of Reputation and the Interest of the Audience, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1341 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Emily C. Gainor, Initial Disclosures and Discovery Reform in the Wake of Plausible Pleading Standards, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1441 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Katherine A. McAllister, A Distinction Without a Difference? ERISA Preemption and the Untenable Differential Treatment of Revocation-on-Divorce and Slayer Statutes, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1481 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Sebastian Waisman, Pullman Abstention in [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg" /></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 52:4 (September 2011)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Gregory C. Shaffer &amp; Mark A. Pollack, <i>Hard Versus Soft Law in International Security</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1147 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_4/01_shaffer_pollack.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Roger A. Fairfax, Jr., <i>Prosecutorial Nullification</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 685 (2011) 7243 [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_4/02_fairfax.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Michael Grynberg, <i>The Judicial Role in Trademark Law</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1283 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_4/03_grynberg.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Laura A. Heymann, <i>The Law of Reputation and the Interest of the Audience</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1341 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_4/04_heymann.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Emily C. Gainor, <i>Initial Disclosures and Discovery Reform in the Wake of Plausible Pleading Standards</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1441 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_4/05_gainor.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Katherine A. McAllister, <i>A Distinction Without a Difference? ERISA Preemption and the Untenable Differential Treatment of Revocation-on-Divorce and Slayer Statutes</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1481 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_4/06_mcallister.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Sebastian Waisman, Pullman <i>Abstention in Preemption Cases</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1515 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_4/07_waisman.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-524-september-2011.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:3 (May 2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-523-may-2011.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-523-may-2011.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 May 2011 23:35:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=46146</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:3 (May 2011)
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>Joseph Blocher, Viewpoint Neutrality and Government Speech, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 695 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Robert M. Chesney, Who May Be Held?  Military Detention Through the Habeas Lens, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 769 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Thomas A. Lambert, The Roberts Court and the Limits of Antitrust, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 871 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Timothy Zick, The First Amendment in Trans-Border Perspective: Toward a More Cosmopolitan Orientation, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 941 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Francis Bingham, Show Me the Money: Public Access and Accountability After Citizens United, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1027 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Gregory Bradford, Simplifying State Standing: The Role of Sovereign Interests in Future Climate Litigation, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1065 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Erin Dewey, Sundown and You Better Take Care: Why Sunset [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"/></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 52:3 (May 2011)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Joseph Blocher, <i>Viewpoint Neutrality and Government Speech</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 695 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_3/01_blocher.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Robert M. Chesney, <i>Who May Be Held?  Military Detention Through the Habeas Lens</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 769 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_3/02_chesney.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Thomas A. Lambert, <i>The Roberts Court and the Limits of Antitrust</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 871 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_3/03_lambert.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Timothy Zick, <i>The First Amendment in Trans-Border Perspective: Toward a More Cosmopolitan Orientation</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 941 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_3/04_zick.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Francis Bingham, <i>Show Me the Money: Public Access and Accountability After </i>Citizens United<i></i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1027 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_3/05_bingham.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Gregory Bradford, <i>Simplifying State Standing: The Role of Sovereign Interests in Future Climate Litigation</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1065 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_3/06_bradford.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Erin Dewey, <i>Sundown and You Better Take Care: Why Sunset Provisions Harm the Renewable Energy Industry and Violate Tax Principles</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1105 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_3/07_dewey.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-523-may-2011.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:2 (March 2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/03/boston-college-law-review-issue-522-march-2011.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/03/boston-college-law-review-issue-522-march-2011.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Mar 2011 19:42:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=42668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:2 (March 2011)
</p>
<p>THE NCAA AT 100: PERSPECTIVES ON ITS PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE
</p>
<p>Alfred C. Yen, Foreword [PDF]
</p>
<p>Symposium Articles
</p>
<p>Vikram David Amar, The NCAA as Regulator, Litigant, and State Actor, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 415 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Erin E. Buzuvis, The Feminist Case for the NCAA&#8217;s Recognition of Competitive Cheer as an Emerging Sport for Women, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 439 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Nancy Hogshead-Makar, Hurricane Warning Flag for Olympic Sports: Compliance Practices in Biediger v. Quinnipiac University Signal a Risk to Women&#8217;s and Men&#8217;s Olympic Sports, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 465 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Joseph P. Liu, Sports Merchandising, Publicity Rights, and the Missing Role of the Sports Fan, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 493 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Michael A. McCann, Antitrust, Governance, and Postseason College Football, 52 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"/></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 52:2 (March 2011)</b>
</p>
<p><b>THE NCAA AT 100: PERSPECTIVES ON ITS PAST, PRESENT, AND FUTURE</b>
</p>
<p>Alfred C. Yen, <i>Foreword</i> [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_2/01_foreword.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Symposium Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Vikram David Amar, <i>The NCAA as Regulator, Litigant, and State Actor</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 415 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_2/02_amar.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Erin E. Buzuvis, <i>The Feminist Case for the NCAA&#8217;s Recognition of Competitive Cheer as an Emerging Sport for Women</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 439 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_2/03_buzuvis.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Nancy Hogshead-Makar, <i>Hurricane Warning Flag for Olympic Sports: Compliance Practices in</i> Biediger v. Quinnipiac University <i>Signal a Risk to Women&#8217;s and Men&#8217;s Olympic Sports</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 465 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_2/04_hogshead-makar.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Joseph P. Liu, <i>Sports Merchandising, Publicity Rights, and the Missing Role of the Sports Fan</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 493 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_2/05_liu.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Michael A. McCann, <i>Antitrust, Governance, and Postseason College Football</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 517 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_2/06_mccann.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Maureen A. Weston, <i>NCAA Sanctions: Assigning Blame Where it Belongs</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 551 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_2/07_weston.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Alfred C. Yen, <i>Early Scholarship Offers and the NCAA</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 585 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_2/08_yen.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Neil G. Hood, <i>The First Amendment and New Media: Video Games as Protected Speech and the Implications for the Right of Publicity</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 617 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_2/09_hood.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Christian Sheehan, <i>Making the Jurors the &#8220;Experts&#8221;: The Case for Eyewitness Identification Jury Instructions</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 651 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_2/10_sheehan.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/03/boston-college-law-review-issue-522-march-2011.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:1 (January 2011)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/01/boston-college-law-review-issue-521-january-2011.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/01/boston-college-law-review-issue-521-january-2011.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 31 Jan 2011 21:20:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=39793</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 52:1 (January 2011)
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>Erin Ryan, Negotiating Federalism, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Michael H. LeRoy, Are Arbitrators Above the Law? The &#8220;Manifest Disregard of the Law&#8221; Standard, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 137 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Mohsen Manesh, Delaware and the Market for LLC Law: A Theory of Contractibility and Legal Indeterminacy, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 189 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Essay
</p>
<p>Timothy D. Lytton, Robert L. Rabin, and Peter H. Schuck, Tort as a Litigation Lottery: A Misconceived Metaphor, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 267 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Aimee Fukuchi, A Balance of Convenience: The Use of Burden-Shifting Devices in Criminal Cyberharassment Law, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 289 (2011) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Emily J. Nelson, Custodial Strip Searches of Juveniles: How Safford Informs a New Two-Tiered Standard of Review, 52 B.C. L. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"/></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 52:1 (January 2011)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Erin Ryan, <i>Negotiating Federalism</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_1/01_ryan.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Michael H. LeRoy, <i>Are Arbitrators Above the Law? The &#8220;Manifest Disregard of the Law&#8221; Standard</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 137 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_1/02_leroy.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Mohsen Manesh, <i>Delaware and the Market for LLC Law: A Theory of Contractibility and Legal Indeterminacy</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 189 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_1/03_manesh.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Essay</b>
</p>
<p>Timothy D. Lytton, Robert L. Rabin, and Peter H. Schuck, <i>Tort as a Litigation Lottery: A Misconceived Metaphor</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 267 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_1/04_lytton%20et%20al.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Aimee Fukuchi, <i>A Balance of Convenience: The Use of Burden-Shifting Devices in Criminal Cyberharassment Law</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 289 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_1/05_fukuchi.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Emily J. Nelson, <i>Custodial Strip Searches of Juveniles: How </i>Safford<i> Informs a New Two-Tiered Standard of Review</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 339 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_1/06_nelson.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Laura Prieston, <i>Parents, Students, and the Pledge of Allegiance: Why Courts Must Protect the Marketplace of </i>Student<i> Ideas</i>, 52 B.C. L. Rev. 375 (2011) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/52_1/07_prieston.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2011/01/boston-college-law-review-issue-521-january-2011.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 51:5 (November 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/11/boston-college-law-review-issue-515-november-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/11/boston-college-law-review-issue-515-november-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Nov 2010 23:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=37163</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 51:5 (November 2010)
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>Margaret Meriwether Cordray &#38; Richard Cordray, The Solicitor General&#8217;s Changing Role in Supreme Court Litigation, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1323 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Alex Glashausser, A Return to Form for the Exceptions Clause, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1383 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Michael S. Pardo, Pleadings, Proof, and Judgment: A Unified Theory of Civil Litigation, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1451 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Essay
</p>
<p>Daniel J. Solove, Fourth Amendment Pragmatism, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1511 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Katherine A. Connolly, Who&#8217;s Left Standing for State Sovereignty?: Private Party Standing to Raise Tenth Amendment Claims, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1539 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Rosemary B. Guiltinan, Enforcing a Critical Entitlement: Preemption Claims as an Alternative Way to Protect Medicaid Recipients&#8217; Access to Healthcare, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1583 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Anna [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"/></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 51:5 (November 2010)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Margaret Meriwether Cordray &amp; Richard Cordray, <i>The Solicitor General&#8217;s Changing Role in Supreme Court Litigation</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1323 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_5/01_cordray.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Alex Glashausser, <i>A Return to Form for the Exceptions Clause</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1383 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_5/02_glashausser.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Michael S. Pardo, <i>Pleadings, Proof, and Judgment: A Unified Theory of Civil Litigation</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1451 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_5/03_pardo.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Essay</b>
</p>
<p>Daniel J. Solove, <i>Fourth Amendment Pragmatism</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1511 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_5/04_solove.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Katherine A. Connolly, <i>Who&#8217;s Left Standing for State Sovereignty?: Private Party Standing to Raise Tenth Amendment Claims</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1539 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_5/05_connolly.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Rosemary B. Guiltinan, <i>Enforcing a Critical Entitlement: Preemption Claims as an Alternative Way to Protect Medicaid Recipients&#8217; Access to Healthcare</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1583 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_5/06_guiltinan.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Anna C. Tavis, <i>Healthcare for All: Insuring States Comply with the Equal Protection Rights of Legal Immigrants</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1627 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_5/07_tavis.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/11/boston-college-law-review-issue-515-november-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 51:4 (September 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-514-september-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-514-september-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Sep 2010 15:37:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=34539</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 51:4 (September 2010)
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>Christina Bohannan &#38; Herbert Hovenkamp, IP and Antitrust: Reformation and Harm, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 905 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Michael S. Kirsch, The Role of Physical Presence in the Taxation of Cross-Border Personal Services, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 993 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Cassandra Burke Robertson, Transnational Litigation and Institutional Choice, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1081 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Corey Rayburn Yung, Judged by the Company You Keep: An Empirical Study of the Ideologies of Judges on the United States Courts of Appeals, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1133 (2010) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Richard F. Conklin, Why &#8220;or&#8221; Really Means &#8220;or&#8221;: In Defense of the Plain Meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act&#8217;s Safe Harbor Provision, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1209 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Samira Alić Omerović, Improper Taxation of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"/></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 51:4 (September 2010)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Christina Bohannan &amp; Herbert Hovenkamp, <i>IP and Antitrust: Reformation and Harm</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 905 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_4/02_bohannan_%20hovenkamp.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Michael S. Kirsch, <i>The Role of Physical Presence in the Taxation of Cross-Border Personal Services</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 993 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_4/03_kirsch.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Cassandra Burke Robertson, <i>Transnational Litigation and Institutional Choice</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1081 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_4/04_robertson.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Corey Rayburn Yung, <i>Judged by the Company You Keep: An Empirical Study of the Ideologies of Judges on the United States Courts of Appeals</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1133 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_4/05_yung_replacement_for_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Richard F. Conklin, <i>Why &#8220;or&#8221; Really Means &#8220;or&#8221;: In Defense of the Plain Meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act&#8217;s Safe Harbor Provision</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1209 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_4/06_conklin.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Samira Alić Omerović, <i>Improper Taxation of the Vowed Religious: How </i>Glenshaw Glass<i> Principles Can Reestablish Horizontal Equity</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1247 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_4/07_omerovic.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Michaela P. Sewall, <i>Pushing Execution over the Constitutional Line: Forcible Medication of Condemned Inmates and the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1279 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/content/dam/files/schools/law/bclawreview/pdf/51_4/08_sewall.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-514-september-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 51:3 (May 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-513-may-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-513-may-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 May 2010 23:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=29328</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 51:3 (May 2010)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Katherine J. Florey, Indian Country&#8217;s Borders: Territoriality, Immunity, and the Construction of Tribal Sovereignty, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 595 (2010) [PDF]</p>
<p>Christopher P. Guzelian, True and False Speech, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 669 (2010) [PDF]</p>
<p>Doug Keller, Why the Prior Conviction Sentencing Enhancements in Illegal Re-Entry Cases Are Unjust and Unjustified (and Unreasonable Too), 51 B.C. L. Rev. 719 (2010) [PDF]</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Carl W. Tobias, Postpartisan Federal Judicial Selection, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 769 (2010) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Samuel R. Feldman, Not-So-Great Weight: Treaty Deference and the Article 10(a) Controversy, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 797 (2010) [PDF]</p>
<p>Matthew Mazzotta, Balancing Act: Finding Consensus on Standards for Unmasking Anonymous Internet Speakers, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 833 (2010) [PDF]</p>
<p>Alexandra W. Reimelt, An Unjust Bargain: Plea Bargains and Waiver [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg" alt="" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em>, Issue 51:3 (May 2010)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Katherine J. Florey, <em>Indian Country&#8217;s Borders: Territoriality, Immunity, and the Construction of Tribal Sovereignty</em>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 595 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_3/02_florey.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Christopher P. Guzelian, <em>True and False Speech</em>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 669 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_3/03_guzelian.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Doug Keller, <em>Why the Prior Conviction Sentencing Enhancements in Illegal Re-Entry Cases Are Unjust and Unjustified (and Unreasonable Too)</em>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 719 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_3/04_keller.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Essay</strong></p>
<p>Carl W. Tobias, <em>Postpartisan Federal Judicial Selection</em>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 769 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_3/05_tobias.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Samuel R. Feldman, <em>Not-So-Great Weight: Treaty Deference and the Article 10(a) Controversy</em>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 797 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_3/06_feldman.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Matthew Mazzotta, <em>Balancing Act: Finding Consensus on Standards for Unmasking Anonymous Internet Speakers</em>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 833 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_3/07_mazzotta.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Alexandra W. Reimelt, <em>An Unjust Bargain: Plea Bargains and Waiver of the Right to Appeal</em>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 871 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_3/08_reimelt.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-513-may-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 51:2 (March 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/boston-college-law-review-issue-512-march-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/boston-college-law-review-issue-512-march-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Mar 2010 16:55:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=26561</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 51:2 (March 2010)
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>Catherine T. Struve, Shifting Burdens: Discrimination Law Through the Lens of Jury Instructions, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 279 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Margaret Tarkington, A Free Speech Right to Impugn Judicial Integrity in Court Proceedings, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 363 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>David I. Walker, The Challenge of Improving the Long-Term Focus of Executive Pay, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 435 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Emily A. Graefe, The Conflicting Obligations of Museums Possessing Nazi-Looted Art, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 473 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Margaretta E. Homsey, Procedural Due Process and Hearsay Evidence in Section 8 Housing Voucher Termination Hearings, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 517 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Sara Roitman, Beyond Reproach: Has the Doctrine of Arbitral Immunity Been Extended Too Far for Arbitration Sponsoring Firms?, 51 B.C. L. Rev. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg" alt="Boston College Law Review Logo" /></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 51:2 (March 2010)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Catherine T. Struve, <i>Shifting Burdens: Discrimination Law Through the Lens of Jury Instructions</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 279 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_2/01_struve.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Margaret Tarkington, <i>A Free Speech Right to Impugn Judicial Integrity in Court Proceedings</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 363 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_2/02_tarkington.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>David I. Walker, <i>The Challenge of Improving the Long-Term Focus of Executive Pay</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 435 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_2/03_walker.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Emily A. Graefe, <i>The Conflicting Obligations of Museums Possessing Nazi-Looted Art</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 473 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_2/04_graefe.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Margaretta E. Homsey, <i>Procedural Due Process and Hearsay Evidence in Section 8 Housing Voucher Termination Hearings</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 517 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_2/05_homsey.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Sara Roitman, <i>Beyond Reproach: Has the Doctrine of Arbitral Immunity Been Extended Too Far for Arbitration Sponsoring Firms?</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 557 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_2/06_roitman.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/03/boston-college-law-review-issue-512-march-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 51:1 (January 2010)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/boston-college-law-review-issue-511-january-2010.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/boston-college-law-review-issue-511-january-2010.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 00:28:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=24753</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 51:1 (January 2010)
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr., The Shot (Not) Heard &#8216;Round the World: Reconsidering the Perplexing U.S. Preoccupation with the Separation of Executive and Legislative Powers, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Gregg D. Polsky and Brant J. Hellwig, Taxing Structured Settlements, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 39 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Joseph A. Seiner, Pleading Disability, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 95 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Essay
</p>
<p>Robert L. Tsai, John Brown&#8217;s Constitution, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 151 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Michael McGarry, A Statute in Particularly Serious Need of Reinterpretation: The Particularly Serious Crime Exception to Withholding of Removal, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 209 (2010) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Mark D. Pezold, When To Be a Court of Last Resort: The Search for a Standard of Review for the Suspension Clause, 51 B.C. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg" alt="Boston College Law Review Logo" /></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 51:1 (January 2010)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Ronald J. Krotoszynski, Jr., <i>The Shot (Not) Heard &#8216;Round the World: Reconsidering the Perplexing U.S. Preoccupation with the Separation of Executive and Legislative Powers</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_1/01_krotoszynski.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Gregg D. Polsky and Brant J. Hellwig, <i>Taxing Structured Settlements</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 39 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_1/02_polsky_hellwig.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Joseph A. Seiner, <i>Pleading Disability</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 95 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_1/03_seiner.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Essay</b>
</p>
<p>Robert L. Tsai, <i>John Brown&#8217;s Constitution</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 151 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_1/04_tsai.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Michael McGarry, <i>A Statute in Particularly Serious Need of Reinterpretation: The Particularly Serious Crime Exception to Withholding of Removal</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 209 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_1/05_mcgarry.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Mark D. Pezold, <i>When To Be a Court of Last Resort: The Search for a Standard of Review for the Suspension Clause</i>, 51 B.C. L. Rev. 243 (2010) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/51_1/06_pezold.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2010/01/boston-college-law-review-issue-511-january-2010.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:5 (November 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/boston-college-law-review-issue-505-november-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/boston-college-law-review-issue-505-november-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Dec 2009 21:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=22709</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:5 (November 2009)
</p>
<p>Publicity, Privacy, and Intellectual Property Meet the First Amendment
</p>
<p>Forward
</p>
<p>Mary-Rose Papandrea, Where Intellectual Property and Free Speech Collide, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1307 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Symposium Articles
</p>
<p>Lauren Gelman, Privacy, Free Speech, and &#34;Blurry-Edged&#34; Social Networks, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1315 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, A Perspective on Human Dignity, the First Amendment, and the Right of Publicity, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1345 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, Anonymity in Cyberspace: What Can We Learn from John Doe?, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1373 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>David S. Olson, First Amendment Interests and Copyright Accommodations, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1393 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Elizabeth A. Rowe, Trade Secret Litigation and Free Speech: Is It Time to Restrain the Plaintiffs?, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1425 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Rebecca [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg" alt="Boston College Law Review Logo" /></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:5 (November 2009)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Publicity, Privacy, and Intellectual Property Meet the First Amendment</b>
</p>
<p><b>Forward</b>
</p>
<p>Mary-Rose Papandrea, <i>Where Intellectual Property and Free Speech Collide</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1307 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_5/01_foreword.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Symposium Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Lauren Gelman, <i>Privacy, Free Speech, and &quot;Blurry-Edged&quot; Social Networks</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1315 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_5/02_gelman.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Roberta Rosenthal Kwall, <i>A Perspective on Human Dignity, the First Amendment, and the Right of Publicity</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1345 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_5/03_kwall.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Lyrissa Barnett Lidsky, <i>Anonymity in Cyberspace: What Can We Learn from John Doe?</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1373 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_5/04_lidsky.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>David S. Olson, <i>First Amendment Interests and Copyright Accommodations</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1393 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_5/05_olson.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Elizabeth A. Rowe, <i>Trade Secret Litigation and Free Speech: Is It Time to Restrain the Plaintiffs?</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1425 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_5/06_rowe.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Rebecca Tushnet, <i>Fighting Freestyle: The First Amendment, Fairness, and Corporate Reputation</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1457 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_5/07_tushnet.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Alfred C. Yen, <i>A First Amendment Perspective on the Construction of Third-Party Copyright Liability</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1481 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_5/08_yen.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Diane Leenheer Zimmerman, <i>Money as a Thumb on the Constitutional Scale: Weighing Speech Against Publicity Rights</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1503 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_5/09_zimmerman.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Igor Helman, <i>Spam-A-Lot: The States&#8217; Crusade Against Unsolicited Email in Light of the CAN-SPAM Act and the Overbreadth Doctrine</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1525 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_5/10_helman.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Harriet A. Hoder, <i>Supervising Cyberspace: A Simple Threshold for Public School Jurisdiction over Students&#8217; Online Activities</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1563 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_5/11_hoder.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Leigh Tinmouth, <i>The Fairness of a Fair Trial: Not Guilty Pleas and the Right to Effective Assistance of Counsel</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1607 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_5/12_tinmouth.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/12/boston-college-law-review-issue-505-november-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:4 (September 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-504-september-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-504-september-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:22:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=20838</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:4 (September 2009)
</p>
<p>Remarks
</p>
<p>Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, Flexibility and Optimism in an Unpredictable World, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 941 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>Miriam Hechler Baer, Governing Corporate Compliance, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 949 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Lawrence A. Hamermesh &#38; Michael L. Wachter, Rationalizing Appraisal Standards in Compulsory Buyouts, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1021 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Carissa Byrne Hessick, Ineffective Assistance at Sentencing, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1069 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Gary Lawson &#38; Robert D. Sloane, The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico&#8217;s Legal Status Reconsidered, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1123 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Jesse H. Alderman, Crying Wolf: The Unlawful Delisting of Northern Rocky Mountain Gray Wolves from Endangered Species Act Protections, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1195 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Adam M. Leamon, Section 108 of the I.R.C. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg" alt="Boston College Law Review Logo" /></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:4 (September 2009)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Remarks</b>
</p>
<p>Chairman Ben S. Bernanke, <i>Flexibility and Optimism in an Unpredictable World</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 941 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/01_bernanke.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>Miriam Hechler Baer, <i>Governing Corporate Compliance</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 949 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/02_baer.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Lawrence A. Hamermesh &amp; Michael L. Wachter, <i>Rationalizing Appraisal Standards in Compulsory Buyouts</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1021 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/03_hamermesh%20%26%20wachter.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Carissa Byrne Hessick, <i>Ineffective Assistance at Sentencing</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1069 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/04_hessick.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Gary Lawson &amp; Robert D. Sloane, <i>The Constitutionality of Decolonization by Associated Statehood: Puerto Rico&#8217;s Legal Status Reconsidered</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1123 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/05_lawson-sloane.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Jesse H. Alderman, <i>Crying Wolf: The Unlawful Delisting of Northern Rocky Mountain Gray Wolves from Endangered Species Act Protections</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1195 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/06_alderman.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Adam M. Leamon, <i>Section 108 of the I.R.C. and the Inclusion of </i>Tufts<i> Gain: A Proposal for Reform</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1243 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/07_leamon.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Caitlin M. Mulligan, <i>From AAA to F: How the Credit Rating Agencies Failed America and What Can Be Done to Protect Investors</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1275 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_4/08_mulligan.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/09/boston-college-law-review-issue-504-september-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:3 (May 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-503-may-2009.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-503-may-2009.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:12:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.concurringopinions.com/?p=16180</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:3 (May 2009)
</p>
<p>Articles
</p>
<p>William K. Sjostrom, Jr., Carving a New Path to Equity Capital and Share Liquidity, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 639 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Brian Z. Tamanaha, The Distorting Slant in Quantitative Studies of Judging, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 685 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Suja A. Thomas, The Fallacy of Dispositive Procedure, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 759 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Bruce J. Winick, The Supreme Court&#8217;s Evolving Death Penalty Jurisprudence: Severe Mental Illness as the Next Frontier, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 785 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Notes
</p>
<p>Reagan S. Bissonnette, Reasonably Accommodating Nonmitigating Plaintiffs After the ADA Amendments Act of 2008, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 859 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>James D. Myers, Bringing the Vice President into the Fold: Executive Immunity and the Vice Presidency, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 897 (2009) [PDF]
</p>
<p>Contents of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"/></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:3 (May 2009)</b>
</p>
<p><b>Articles</b>
</p>
<p>William K. Sjostrom, Jr., <i>Carving a New Path to Equity Capital and Share Liquidity</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 639 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/01_sjostrom.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Brian Z. Tamanaha, <i>The Distorting Slant in Quantitative Studies of Judging</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 685 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/02_tamanaha.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Suja A. Thomas, <i>The Fallacy of Dispositive Procedure</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 759 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/03_thomas.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>Bruce J. Winick, <i>The Supreme Court&#8217;s Evolving Death Penalty Jurisprudence: Severe Mental Illness as the Next Frontier</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 785 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/04_winick.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><b>Notes</b>
</p>
<p>Reagan S. Bissonnette, <i>Reasonably Accommodating Nonmitigating Plaintiffs After the ADA Amendments Act of 2008</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 859 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/05_bissonette.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p>James D. Myers, <i>Bringing the Vice President into the Fold: Executive Immunity and the Vice Presidency</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 897 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_3/06_myers.pdf">PDF</a>]
</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/05/boston-college-law-review-issue-503-may-2009.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:2 (March 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/boston_college_7.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/boston_college_7.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Apr 2009 21:46:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/04/boston-college-law-review-issue-502-march-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:2 (March 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Kimberly Jenkins Robinson, The Constitutional Future of Race-Neutral Efforts to Achieve Diversity and Avoid Racial Isolation in Elementary and Secondary Schools, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 277 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p> Fabio Arcila, Jr., The Framers&#8217; Search Power: The Misunderstood Statutory History of Suspicion &#038; Probable Cause, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 363 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Margit Livingston, Inspiration or Imitation: Copyright Protection for Stage Directions, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 427 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Essay</p>
<p>Mark S. Stein, Nussbaum: A Utilitarian Critique, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 489 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Kristen MacIsaac, Medicare&#8217;s August Rule: Necessary Step Toward Minimizing Federal Spending or Overbroad Decision Leading to Higher Malpractice Costs?, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 533 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Jacob Tabor, Students&#8217; First Amendment Rights in the Age of the Internet: Off-Campus Cyberspeech [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:2 (March 2009)</b></p>
<p><b>Articles</b></p>
<p>Kimberly Jenkins Robinson, <i>The Constitutional Future of Race-Neutral Efforts to Achieve Diversity and Avoid Racial Isolation in Elementary and Secondary Schools</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 277 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/01_robinson.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p> Fabio Arcila, Jr., <i>The Framers&#8217; Search Power: The Misunderstood Statutory History of Suspicion &#038; Probable Cause</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 363 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/02_arcila.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Margit Livingston, <i>Inspiration or Imitation: Copyright Protection for Stage Directions</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 427 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/03_livingston.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Essay</b></p>
<p>Mark S. Stein, <i>Nussbaum: A Utilitarian Critique</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 489 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/04_stein.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Notes</b></p>
<p>Kristen MacIsaac, <i>Medicare&#8217;s August Rule: Necessary Step Toward Minimizing Federal Spending or Overbroad Decision Leading to Higher Malpractice Costs?</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 533 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/05_macisaac.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Jacob Tabor, <i>Students&#8217; First Amendment Rights in the Age of the Internet: Off-Campus Cyberspeech and School Regulation</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 561 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/06_tabor.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Peter Tipps, <i>Controlling the Lead Paint Debate: Why Control Is Not an Element of Public Nuisance</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 605 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_2/07_tipps.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/04/boston_college_7.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:1 (January 2009)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/boston_college_6.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/boston_college_6.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2009/02/boston-college-law-review-issue-501-january-2009.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 50:1 (January 2009)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Elena Baylis, Reassessing the Role of International Criminal Law: Rebuilding National Courts Through Transnational Networks, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Adam Candeub, An Economic Theory of Criminal Excuse, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 87 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>David Fagundes, Crystals in the Public Domain, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 139 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Emily Barbour, Separate and Invisible: Alternative Education Programs and Our Educational Rights, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 197 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Tim Castelli, Not Guilty by Association: Why the Taint of Their &#8220;Blank Check&#8221; Predecessors Should Not Stunt the Growth of Modern Special Purpose Acquisition Companies, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 237 (2009) [PDF]</p>
<p>Contents of current and past issues are available at our website.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 50:1 (January 2009)</b></p>
<p><b>Articles</b></p>
<p>Elena Baylis, <i>Reassessing the Role of International Criminal Law: Rebuilding National Courts Through Transnational Networks</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/02_baylis.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Adam Candeub, <i>An Economic Theory of Criminal Excuse</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 87 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/03_candeub.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>David Fagundes, <i>Crystals in the Public Domain</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 139 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/04_fagundes.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Notes</b></p>
<p>Emily Barbour, <i>Separate and Invisible: Alternative Education Programs and Our Educational Rights</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 197 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/05_barbour.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Tim Castelli, <i>Not Guilty by Association: Why the Taint of Their &#8220;Blank Check&#8221; Predecessors Should Not Stunt the Growth of Modern Special Purpose Acquisition Companies</i>, 50 B.C. L. Rev. 237 (2009) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/50_1/06_castelli.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2009/02/boston_college_6.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:5 (November 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/boston_college_5.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/boston_college_5.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Nov 2008 17:31:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/11/boston-college-law-review-issue-495-november-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:5 (November 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Marc O. DeGirolami, The Problem of Religious Learning, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1213 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Ruth Mason, Made in America for European Tax: The International Consistency Test, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1277 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Richard E. Myers II, Responding to the Time-Base Failures of the Criminal Law Through a Criminal Sunset Amendment, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1327 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p> Douglas G. Smith, The Constitutionality of Civil Commitment and the Requirement of Adequate Treatment, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1383 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Note</p>
<p>Michael K. Avery, Whose Rights? Why States Should Set the Parameters for Federal Honest Services Mail and Wire Fraud Protections, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1431 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Contents of current and past issues are available at our website.</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"></p>
<p><b><i>Boston College Law Review</i>, Issue 49:5 (November 2008)</b></p>
<p><b>Articles</b></p>
<p>Marc O. DeGirolami, <i>The Problem of Religious Learning</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1213 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/01_degirolami.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Ruth Mason, <i>Made in America for European Tax: The International Consistency Test</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1277 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/02_mason.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Richard E. Myers II, <i>Responding to the Time-Base Failures of the Criminal Law Through a Criminal Sunset Amendment</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1327 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/03_myers.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p> Douglas G. Smith, <i>The Constitutionality of Civil Commitment and the Requirement of Adequate Treatment</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1383 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/04_smith.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><b>Note</b></p>
<p>Michael K. Avery, <i>Whose Rights? Why States Should Set the Parameters for Federal Honest Services Mail and Wire Fraud Protections</i>, 49 B.C. L. Rev 1431 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_5/05_avery.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><i>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website.</i><br/></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/11/boston_college_5.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:4 (September 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/boston_college_4.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/boston_college_4.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 18:31:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/10/boston-college-law-review-issue-494-september-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:4 (September 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Donald G. Gifford, Impersonating the Legislature: State Attorneys General and Parens Patriae Product Litigation, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 913 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Thomas A. Piraino, Jr., The Antitrust Implications of &#8220;Going Private&#8221; and Other Changes of Corporate Control, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 971 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Mark DeFeo, Unlocking the iPhone: How Antitrust Law Can Save Consumers from the Inadequacies of Copyright Law, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1037 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Michael Kaneb, Neither Realistic Nor Constitutionally Sound: The Problem of the FCC&#8217;s Community Standard for Broadcast Indecency Determinations, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1081 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Daniel McFadden, A First Amendment Analysis of Military Regulations Restricting the Wearing of Military Uniforms by Members of the Individual Ready Reserve Who Participate in Politically Themed Theatrical Productions, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em></strong><strong>, Issue 49:4 (September 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Donald G. Gifford, <em>Impersonating the Legislature: State Attorneys General and Parens Patriae Product Litigation</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 913 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/01_gifford_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Thomas A. Piraino, Jr., <em>The Antitrust Implications of &#8220;Going Private&#8221; and Other Changes of Corporate Control</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 971 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/02_piraino_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Mark DeFeo, <em>Unlocking the iPhone: How Antitrust Law Can Save Consumers from the Inadequacies of Copyright Law</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1037 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/03_defeo_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Michael Kaneb, <em>Neither Realistic Nor Constitutionally Sound: The Problem of the FCC&#8217;s Community Standard for Broadcast Indecency Determinations</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1081 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/04_kaneb_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Daniel McFadden, <em>A First Amendment Analysis of Military Regulations Restricting the Wearing of Military Uniforms by Members of the Individual Ready Reserve Who Participate in Politically Themed Theatrical Productions</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1131 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/05_mcfadden_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Kevin J. O&#8217;Brien, <em>Federal Regulation of State Employment Under the Commerce Clause and &#8220;National Defense&#8221; Powers: Constitutional Issues Presented by the Public Safety Employer-Employee Cooperation Act</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1175 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_4/06_o%27brien_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available on our website.</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/10/boston_college_4.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:3 (2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/boston_college_3.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/boston_college_3.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 15:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/04/boston-college-law-review-issue-493-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:3 (May 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Steven A. Dean, The Incomplete Global Market for Tax Information, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 605 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Jonathan Remy Nash, Economic Efficiency Versus Public Choice: The Case of Property Rights in Road Traffic Management, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 673 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Katherine J. Strandburg, Freedom of Association in a Networked World: First Amendment Regulation of Relational Surveillance, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 741 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Jonathan K. Geldert, Presidential Advisors and Their Most Unpresidential Activities: Why Executive Privilege Cannot Shield White House Information in the U.S. Attorney Firings Controversy, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 823 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>John A. Kupiec, Returning to Principles of &#8220;Fairness and Justice&#8221;: The Role of Investment-Backed Expectations in Total Regulatory Taking Claims, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 865 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Contents [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BC-logo2.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"width="479" height="149" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em>, Issue 49:3 (May 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Steven A. Dean, <em>The Incomplete Global Market for Tax Information</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 605 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/01_dean_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Jonathan Remy Nash, <em>Economic Efficiency Versus Public Choice: The Case of Property Rights in Road Traffic Management</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 673 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/02_nash_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Katherine J. Strandburg, <em>Freedom of Association in a Networked World: First Amendment Regulation of Relational Surveillance</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 741 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/03_strandburg_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Jonathan K. Geldert, <em>Presidential Advisors and Their Most Unpresidential Activities: Why Executive Privilege Cannot Shield White House Information in the U.S. Attorney Firings Controversy</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 823 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/04_geldert_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>John A. Kupiec, <em>Returning to Principles of &#8220;Fairness and Justice&#8221;: The Role of Investment-Backed Expectations in Total Regulatory Taking Claims</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 865 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_3/05_kupiec_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/04/boston_college_3.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:2 (March 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/boston_college_2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/boston_college_2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Mar 2008 16:14:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2008/03/boston-college-law-review-issue-492-march-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:2 (March 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Jonathan H. Adler, Money or Nothing: The Adverse Environmental Consequences of Uncompensated Land Use Controls, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 301 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Nancy Levit, Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>A. Benjamin Spencer, Plausibility Pleading, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 431 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Courtney P. Fain, What’s in a Name? The Worrisome Interchange of Juvenile “Adjudications” with Criminal “Convictions”, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 495 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Jessica L. Lambert, Developing a Legal Framework for Resolving Disputes Between “Adoptive Parents” of Frozen Embryos: A Comparison to Resolutions of Divorce Disputes Between Progenitors, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 529 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>William Trunk, The Scourge of Contextualism: Ceremonial Deism and the Establishment Clause, 49 B.C. L. Rev. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BC-logo2.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"width="479" height="149" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em>, Issue 49:2 (March 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Jonathan H. Adler, <em>Money or Nothing: The Adverse Environmental Consequences of Uncompensated Land Use Controls</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 301 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/01_adler.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Nancy Levit, <em>Megacases, Diversity, and the Elusive Goal of Workplace Reform</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 367 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/02_levit.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>A. Benjamin Spencer, <em>Plausibility Pleading</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 431 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/03_spencer.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Courtney P. Fain, <em>What’s in a Name? The Worrisome Interchange of Juvenile “Adjudications” with Criminal “Convictions”</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 495 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/04_fain.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Jessica L. Lambert, <em>Developing a Legal Framework for Resolving Disputes Between “Adoptive Parents” of Frozen Embryos: A Comparison to Resolutions of Divorce Disputes Between Progenitors</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 529 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/05_lambert.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>William Trunk, <em>The Scourge of Contextualism: Ceremonial Deism and the Establishment Clause</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 571 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_2/06_trunk.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website</p>
<p></em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2008/03/boston_college_2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:1 (January 2008)</title>
		<link>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/boston_college.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/boston_college.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Dec 2007 23:52:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Boston College Law Review</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Law Rev (Boston College)]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Law Rev Contents]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.solove.org/archives/2007/12/boston-college-law-review-issue-491-january-2008.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<p></p>
<p>Boston College Law Review, Issue 49:1 (January 2008)</p>
<p>Articles</p>
<p>Michael L. Seigel, Corporate America Fights Back: The Battle over Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Jacqueline D. Lipton, Who Owns “Hillary.com”? Political Speech and the First Amendment in Cyberspace, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 55 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Dru Stevenson, Entrapment and Terrorism, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 125 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Notes</p>
<p>Rebecca A. Kiselewich, In Defense of the 2006 Title IX Regulations for Single-Sex Public Education: How Separate Can Be Equal, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 217 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Melissa Whitney, The Statistical Evidence of Racial Profiling in Traffic Stops and Searches: Rethinking the Use of Statistics to Prove Discriminatory Intent, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 263 (2008) [PDF]</p>
<p>Contents of current and past issues are available at our website</p>
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img alt="BC-logo2.jpg"src="http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/images/BC-logo2.jpg"width="479" height="149" /></p>
<p><strong><em>Boston College Law Review</em>, Issue 49:1 (January 2008)</strong></p>
<p><strong>Articles</strong></p>
<p>Michael L. Seigel, <em>Corporate America Fights Back: The Battle over Waiver of the Attorney-Client Privilege</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 1 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/01_seigel_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Jacqueline D. Lipton, <em>Who Owns “Hillary.com”? Political Speech and the First Amendment in Cyberspace</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 55 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/02_lipton_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Dru Stevenson, <em>Entrapment and Terrorism</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 125 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/03_stevenson_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><strong>Notes</strong></p>
<p>Rebecca A. Kiselewich,<em> In Defense of the 2006 Title IX Regulations for Single-Sex Public Education: How Separate Can Be Equal</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 217 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/04_kiselewich_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p>Melissa Whitney, <em>The Statistical Evidence of Racial Profiling in Traffic Stops and Searches: Rethinking the Use of Statistics to Prove Discriminatory Intent</em>, 49 B.C. L. Rev. 263 (2008) [<a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/meta-elements/pdf/49_1/05_whitney_web.pdf">PDF</a>]</p>
<p><em>Contents of <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview.html">current</a> and <a href="http://www.bc.edu/schools/law/lawreviews/bclawreview/Past_Issues.html">past</a> issues are available at our website</em></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2007/12/boston_college.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

