Site Meter

Oral Argument in West Coast Hotel v. Parrish

Gerard Magliocca

Gerard N. Magliocca is the Samuel R. Rosen Professor at the Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law. Professor Magliocca is the author of three books and over twenty articles on constitutional law and intellectual property. He received his undergraduate degree from Stanford, his law degree from Yale, and joined the faculty after two years as an attorney at Covington and Burling and one year as a law clerk for Judge Guido Calabresi on the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. Professor Magliocca has received the Best New Professor Award and the Black Cane (Most Outstanding Professor) from the student body, and in 2008 held the Fulbright-Dow Distinguished Research Chair of the Roosevelt Study Center in Middelburg, The Netherlands. He was elected to the American Law Institute (ALI) in 2013.

You may also like...

5 Responses

  1. John Dereszewski says:

    I thought in those days, the Justices were a lot more passive during oral arguments and would often allow the advocates to talk on – and maybe even read on – for many minutes without being interrupted by any rude questions. So the fact that Roberts might not have said anything during the Parrish oral argument may not reveal very much.

  2. Gerard Magliocca says:

    True in general, but there’s no way to know if that was true here.

  3. Joe says:

    His later memo on the matter is interesting:

    http://newdeal.feri.org/court/roberts.htm

    Not sure if this is of any assistance, but this provides some analysis of the oral argument & its coverage:

    http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2040771

  4. Shag from Brookline says:

    Joe, once again, comes up with relevant links. Frankfurter was appointed a Justice early in 1939, almost two years after the decision in West Coast Hotel. Thomas Reed Powell, a colleague of Frankfurter at Harvard Law School, in his James S. Carpentier Lectures in 1955 titled “Vagaries and Varieties in Constitutional Interpretation” published by Columbia University Press, at page 81, note 89, briefly discusses Justice Roberts’ vote in West Coast Hotel, contrasting it with his earlier vote in the Tipaldo case. Perhaps Powell had been informed by Frankfurter of the Roberts Memo Joe links to. (Sometime back Joe informed me that the Lectures are available via Google Books.)

  5. Joe says:

    I gather regular transcripts began to be available in the 1950s:

    http://www.lawschool.cornell.edu/library/whatwedo/researchguides/supreme-court-oral.cfm

    A bit strange they didn’t have transcripts back then. Of course, even if you did, they only started to label the justices who asked the question in the official transcripts a few years back. Before then, it could be tricky, though if you listened to the tapes, many of the justices have distinctive voices. Still, I have seen some confusion in certain accounts on who asked what question during let’s say the oral arguments of Roe v. Wade.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image