Site Meter

Corporate Political Speech, Rent-Seeking, and Political Extortion

You may also like...

1 Response

  1. Douglas Levene says:

    All the harm you hypothesize would be be reduced by reducing the scope for rent seeking in the first place. Second order fixes – including highly inefficient and counterproductive ones like authorizing union pension funds to second-guess board decisions on political/lobbying expenses – are not likely to be effective. Union pension funds don’t care about corporate rent seeking. They don’t care if the corporation gets subsidies or tax benefits – those are just as beneficial to the employees as to the residual interest holders. On the contrary, the union activists are opposed to corporations supporting long-run political reform (e.g., better judges or tort reform) that doesn’t have an immediate payoff to the corporation.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Anti-spam image