- Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com -
Hastings Law Journal, Issue 63.6 (August 2012)
Posted By Hastings Law Journal On February 18, 2013 @ 9:16 pm In Law Rev (Hastings),Law Rev Contents | No Comments
Hastings Law Journal [1], Issue 63.6 (August 2012) The Symposium Issue: Law & Policy of the Developing Brain: Neuroscience from Womb to Death
Articles
Bridging Developmental Neuroscience and the Law: Child-Caregiver Relationships [2]
Ross A. Thompson
The Relevance of Immaturities in the Juvenile Brain to Culpability and Rehabilitation [3]
Beatriz Luna
Developmental Neuroscience, Children’s Relationships with Primary Caregivers, and Child Protection Policy Reform [4]
Lois A. Weithorn
The Neurobiology of Attachment to Nurturing and Abusive Caregivers [5]
Regina M. Sullivan, Ph.D.
Creating a Clearinghouse to Evaluate Environmental Risks to Fetal Development [6]
Kate E. Bloch
Fetal Risks of Environmental Chemicals: The Motherisk Approach to the Organic Mercury Fish Consumption Scare [7]
Zahra Jahedmotlage, Kathie Schoeman, John Bend, & Gideon Koren
Poor Women and the Protective State [8]
Khiara M. Bridges
The Government Can Read Your Mind: Can the Constitution Stop It? [9]
Mara Boundy
Corporate Codes of Conduct: Binding Contract or Ideal Publicity? [10]
Haley Revak
The Hastings Law Journal’s online companion, Voir Dire, is now accepting submissions. [11]
Recent Essays:
The Long-Awaited Nationwide Mortgage Settlement:
Only a Small Step Forward in the Struggle for Accountability in the Financial Crisis
Julia Mas-Guindal
Article printed from Concurring Opinions: http://www.concurringopinions.com
URL to article: http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2013/02/hastings-law-journal-issue-63-6-august-2012.html
URLs in this post:
[1] Image: http://www.hastingslawjournal.org
[2] Bridging Developmental Neuroscience and the Law: Child-Caregiver Relationships: http://www.hastingslawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Thompson_63-HLJ-1443.pdf
[3] The Relevance of Immaturities in the Juvenile Brain to Culpability and Rehabilitation: http://www.hastingslawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Luna_63-HLJ-1469.pdf
[4] Developmental Neuroscience, Children’s Relationships with Primary Caregivers, and Child Protection Policy Reform : http://www.hastingslawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Weithorn_63-HLJ-1487.pdf
[5] The Neurobiology of Attachment to Nurturing and Abusive Caregivers : http://www.hastingslawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Sullivan_63-HLJ-1553.pdf
[6] Creating a Clearinghouse to Evaluate Environmental Risks to Fetal Development : http://www.hastingslawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Bloch_63-HLJ-1571.pdf
[7] Fetal Risks of Environmental Chemicals: The Motherisk Approach to the Organic Mercury Fish Consumption Scare: http://www.hastingslawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Koren_63-HLJ-1605.pdf
[8] Poor Women and the Protective State: http://www.hastingslawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Bridges_63-HLJ-1619.pdf
[9] The Government Can Read Your Mind: Can the Constitution Stop It?: http://www.hastingslawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Boundy_63-HLJ-1627.pdf
[10] Corporate Codes of Conduct: Binding Contract or Ideal Publicity?: http://www.hastingslawjournal.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Revak_63-HLJ-1645.pdf
[11] The Hastings Law Journal’s online companion, Voir Dire, is now accepting submissions.: http://www.hastingslawjournal.org/voir-dire
Click here to print.
Copyright © 2010 Concurring Opinions. All rights reserved.