- Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com -
Enduring Mockery of the Term “Bailout”
Posted By Lawrence Cunningham On February 12, 2013 @ 9:57 pm In Current Events | 2 Comments
Proofreading pages for the next edition of The Essays of Warren Buffett: Lessons for Corporate Americ [1]a, I have to single out the following paragraph, from WB’s 2009 letter, that Americans have totally overlooked but should know by heart:
It has not been shareholders who have botched the operations of some of our country’s largest financial institutions. Yet they have borne the burden, with 90% or more of the value of their holdings wiped out in most cases of failure. Collectively, they have lost more than $500 billion in just the four largest financial fiascos of the last two years. To say these owners have been “bailed-out” is to make a mockery of the term.
Pity that Americans actually believe that the “government” did “bail out” shareholders of AIG, et al. Tragic that they likely will continue to harbor such false beliefs. Passages such as this make me think the subtitle of this book should be simply “Lessons for America.”
Article printed from Concurring Opinions: http://www.concurringopinions.com
URL to article: http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2013/02/enduring-mockery-of-the-term-bailout.html
URLs in this post:
[1] The Essays of Warren Buffett: Lessons for Corporate Americ: http://www.amazon.com/The-Essays-Warren-Buffett-Corporate/dp/1611634091/ref=dp_ob_title_bk
Click here to print.
Copyright © 2010 Concurring Opinions. All rights reserved.
2 Comments To "Enduring Mockery of the Term “Bailout”"
#1 Comment By Brett Bellmore On February 13, 2013 @ 7:28 am
Does anyone who’s been paying attention actually think AIG was “bailed out”, rather than being used as a conduit to covertly bail out other companies? Or, rather, the management of other companies, as you’re quite correct that the owners, the shareholders, took a bath.
From an economic perspective, the bailouts didn’t make much sense, but if viewed as a way of laundering federal funds into eventual campaign donations, it did work.
#2 Comment By Shag from Brookline On February 13, 2013 @ 9:09 am
I have serious reservations on Brett’s economic chops, but this:
” .. but if viewed as a way of laundering federal funds into eventual campaign donations, it did work.”
it should be remembered, took place in 2008 during the Bush/Cheney waning days of the Great Recession that resulted from their 8-year reign that rained on and reined in America’s economy. Perhaps Brett has data demonstrating the recipients of those donations that he might identify.