William & Mary Law Review, Issue 54:2 (November 2012)
Posted By William & Mary Law Review On January 10, 2013 @ 1:50 pm In Uncategorized | No Comments
Articles
Michael C. Dorf, Spandrel or Frankenstein’s Monster? The Vices and Virtues of Retrofitting in American Law [1]
Maya Steinitz, The Litigation Finance Contract [2]
Julian Velasco, The Role of Aspiration in Corporate Fiduciary Duties [3]
Mark D. Rosen, The Structural Constitutional Principle of Republican Legitimacy [4]
Notes
Adam S. McGonigle, Applying Equitable Estoppel to ERISA Pension Benefit Claims [5]
Samuel G. Mann, In Name Only: How Major League Baseball’s Reliance on Its Antitrust Exemption is Hurting the Game [6]
Article printed from Concurring Opinions: http://www.concurringopinions.com
URL to article: http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2013/01/william-mary-law-review-issue-542-november-2012.html
URLs in this post:
[1] Spandrel or Frankenstein’s Monster? The Vices and Virtues of Retrofitting in American Law: http://wmlawreview.org/files/7-Dorf.pdf
[2] The Litigation Finance Contract : http://wmlawreview.org/files/9-Steinitz.pdf
[3] The Role of Aspiration in Corporate Fiduciary Duties: http://wmlawreview.org/files/10-Velasco.pdf
[4] The Structural Constitutional Principle of Republican Legitimacy: http://wmlawreview.org/files/8-Rosen.pdf
[5] Applying Equitable Estoppel to ERISA Pension Benefit Claims: http://wmlawreview.org/files/12-McGonigle.pdf
[6] In Name Only: How Major League Baseball’s Reliance on Its Antitrust Exemption is Hurting the Game : http://wmlawreview.org/files/11-Mann.pdf
Click here to print.