- Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com -

Stanford Law Review, 65.1 (2013)

Posted By Stanford Law Review On January 29, 2013 @ 11:00 am In Law Rev (Stanford) | No Comments

Stanford Law Review

Volume 65 • Issue 1 [1] • January 2013

Articles
Removal as a Political Question [2]
Aziz Z. Huq
65 Stan. L. Rev. 1

Putting Desert in its Place [3]
Christopher Slobogin & Lauren Brinkley-Rubinstein
65 Stan. L. Rev. 77

A Clinic’s Place in the Supreme Court Bar [4]
Jeffrey L. Fisher
65 Stan. L. Rev. 137

Notes
Counterfactual Contradictions: Interpretive Error in the Analysis of AEDPA [5]
Amy Knight Burns
65 Stan. L. Rev. 203


Article printed from Concurring Opinions: http://www.concurringopinions.com

URL to article: http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2013/01/stanford-law-review-65-1-2013.html

URLs in this post:

[1] Issue 1: http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/volume-65/issue-1

[2] Removal as a Political Question: http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/removal-political-question

[3] Putting Desert in its Place: http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/putting-desert-its-place

[4] A Clinic’s Place in the Supreme Court Bar: http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/clinics-place-supreme-court-bar

[5] Counterfactual Contradictions: Interpretive Error in the Analysis of AEDPA: http://www.stanfordlawreview.org/print/article/counterfactual-contradictions

Copyright © 2010 Concurring Opinions. All rights reserved.