UCLA Law Review Vol. 60, Discourse
Posted By UCLA Law Review On December 7, 2012 @ 11:10 pm In Book Reviews,Government Secrecy,International & Comparative Law,Law Rev (UCLA),Law Student Discussions | 1 Comment
Volume 60, Discourse
Discourse
| The Benefits of a Big Tent: Opening Up Government in Developing Countries [1] | Jeremy Weinstein & Joshua Goldstein | 38 |
| The Case Against Tamanaha’s Motel 6 Model of Legal Education [2] | Jay Sterling Silver | 52 |
1 Comment (Open | Close)
Article printed from Concurring Opinions: http://www.concurringopinions.com
URL to article: http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2012/12/ucla-law-review-vol-60-discourse-3.html
URLs in this post:
[1] The Benefits of a Big Tent: Opening Up Government in Developing Countries: http://www.uclalawreview.org/?p=4017
[2] The Case Against Tamanaha’s Motel 6 Model of Legal Education: http://www.uclalawreview.org/?p=4036
Click here to print.
1 Comment To "UCLA Law Review Vol. 60, Discourse"
#1 Comment By Anon On December 10, 2012 @ 7:43 am
I found it interesting that the author of the article defending the devotion of law school resources to scholarship has published a whopping three articles since 1985, if a Westlaw author(jay +2 silver) search is reliable. You would think, after all the hubbub, that someone with a publishing record that wouldn’t get even him many FAR interviews in the current environment would think better of blithely wading into the fray, defending his dearly-bought empowerment to do that which he apparently does not do. The complacent self satisfaction of the legal academy knows no bounds.