- Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com -
Recalling Cardozo Law Review’s “Bork Book”
Posted By Lawrence Cunningham On December 19, 2012 @ 3:53 pm In Current Events,Law School,Law School (Law Reviews) | 2 Comments
I never knew Robert H. Bork (1927-2012) but as a rising 3L and law review editor at Cardozo in the summer of 1987, my classmates and I met his intellectual heft and political salience. Just after President Ronald Reagan announced his nomination of Bork to be Associate Justice of the Supreme Court in late July, it was obvious that the country was headed for a passionate debate on justice writ large (e.g., abortion, antitrust, civil rights, free speech, you name it).
Sensing an opportunity to discipline the discourse, we decided to collect and publish a dozen essays and four reports assessing Judge Bork’s jurisprudence from every angle. Well-advised throughout by our professors, David Rudenstine  and Monroe Price , we solicited extant or original pieces by such luminaries as Ronald Dworkin, Steve Gillers, Mary Ann Glendon and Michael McConnell, as well as reports of the White House, Public Citizen, a research group commissioned by the Senate Judiciary Committee (led by Christopher Schroeder and approved by Floyd Abrams, Clark Clifford, Walter Dellinger and Laurence Tribe) and a DOJ response thereto.
Fifty of us, new 2L staff and 3L editors, spent an intense two weeks collating and editing the contributions. Then four of us (Jim Nobile , Allen Applbaum , Jeff Stamler and me) flew to Lincoln, Nebraska, site of the leading printer of law reviews, Joe Christensen Inc. We spent several more days and sleepless nights scrutinizing the page proofs before giving the print order. After 10,000 copies were printed, Jeff and I flew back to New York while Jim and Allen drove a rented U-Haul to Washington D.C. where the town was abuzz with debate and Senate hearings would shortly begin.
Meanwhile, back in the nation’s capital, another classmate, Barbara Braucher  (who later married U.S. Attorney General Ted Olson and still later perished aboard one of the hijacked airplanes on 9/11) had been making her rounds in the Senate, where Barbara had many connections. She alerted members of the Senate Judiciary Committee, including its chairman Joe Biden, that our law review issue, addressing every important topic and viewpoint in a compact 530 pages under a single two-inch spine, was on its way.
Upon their arrival in Washington, Jim and Allen toted several boxes directly to the awaiting Senators. Standing on the steps of the Capitol when delivering the books, the New York Times interviewed our classmates about this effort. The story (here ) ran the next day, along with a cute quote from Allen and a photo of the group.
The special issue, released in early October ahead of the hearings, sold briskly at many book shops around Washington and New York that fall. It was clear during the hearings that many Senators had read our product. In the years after, it was even clearer that Judge Bork had, as he cited to our “Bork book” often. The issue was volume 9, no. 1 and was a great start to our third year of law school and one of many innovative academic undertakings for which the Cardozo Law Review became known over ensuing decades.
Article printed from Concurring Opinions: http://www.concurringopinions.com
URL to article: http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2012/12/recalling-cardozo-law-reviews-bork-book.html
URLs in this post:
 Image: http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2012/12/recalling-cardozo-law-reviews-bork-book.html/the-bork-nomination-2
 David Rudenstine: http://www.cardozo.yu.edu/MemberContentDisplay.aspx?ccmd=ContentDisplay&ucmd=UserDisplay&userid=10540
 Monroe Price: http://www.asc.upenn.edu/faculty/Faculty-Bio.aspx?id=154
 Jim Nobile: http://blog.nj.com/iamnj/2007/01/james_nobile.html
 Allen Applbaum: http://www.fticonsulting.com/global2/professionals/allen-d-applbaum.aspx
 Barbara Braucher: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Barbara_Olson
 here: http://www.nytimes.com/1987/10/02/us/washington-talk-briefing-a-law-review-on-bork.html
Copyright © 2010 Concurring Opinions. All rights reserved.