- Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com -

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 80:6 (November 2012)

Posted By George Washington Law Review On November 30, 2012 @ 10:41 pm In Law Rev (GW) | No Comments

GWLRbannerTOC.gif

The George Washington Law Review, Issue 80:6 (November 2012)

COMMEMORATING THE 100TH ANNIVERSARY OF FARRAND’S RECORDS OF THE FEDERAL CONVENTION

(Contents of current [1] and past [2] issues are available from our website.)

Introduction:

William K. Kelley, Justice Antonin Scalia and the Long Game, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1601 (2012) [PDF [3]]

Dialogue:

The Honorable Antonin Scalia & John F. Manning, A Dialogue on Statutory and Constitutional Interpretation, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1610 (2012) [PDF [4]]

Articles:

Mary Sarah Bilder, How Bad Were the Official Records of the Federal Convention?, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1620 (2012) [PDF [5]]

Jamal Greene, The Case for Original Intent, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1683 (2012) [PDF [6]]

Gregory E. Maggs, A Concise Guide to the Records of the Federal Constitutional Convention of 1787 as a Source of the Original Meaning of the U.S. Constitution, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1707 (2012) [PDF [7]]

John F. Manning, The Role of the Philadelphia Convention in Constitutional Adjudication, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1753 (2012) [PDF [8]]

Maeva Marcus, The Effect (or Non-Effect) of Founders on the Supreme Court Bench, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1794 (2012) [PDF [9]]

Stephen E. Sachs, Constitutional Backdrops, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1813 (2012) [PDF [10]]

Panel:

Amanda L. Tyler, Moderator, The Honorable Frank H. Easterbrook, The Honorable Brett M. Kavanaugh, The Honorable Charles F. Lettow, The Honorable Reena Raggi, The Honorable Jeffrey S. Sutton & The Honorable Diane P. Wood, A Dialogue with Federal Judges on the Role of History in Interpretation, 80 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. 1889 (2012) [PDF [11]]

 

 


Article printed from Concurring Opinions: http://www.concurringopinions.com

URL to article: http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2012/11/the-george-washington-law-review-issue-806-november-2012.html

URLs in this post:

[1] current: http://www.gwlr.org/

[2] past: http://www.gwlr.org/print/

[3] PDF: http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Kelley_80_6.pdf

[4] PDF: http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Scalia_Manning_80_6.pdf

[5] PDF: http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Bilder_80_6.pdf

[6] PDF: http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Greene_80_6.pdf

[7] PDF: http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Maggs_80_6.pdf

[8] PDF: http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Manning_80_6.pdf

[9] PDF: http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Marcus_80_6.pdf

[10] PDF: http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Sachs_80_6.pdf

[11] PDF: http://www.gwlr.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Panel_80_6.pdf

Copyright © 2010 Concurring Opinions. All rights reserved.