- Concurring Opinions - http://www.concurringopinions.com -
Schneier Calls Out Papers on How Terroristist Groups End
Posted By Deven Desai On November 15, 2012 @ 9:57 pm In International & Comparative Law,Military Law,Political Economy,Politics | 6 Comments
Abstract: How do terrorist groups end? The evidence since 1968 indicates that terrorist groups rarely cease to exist as a result of winning or losing a military campaign. Rather, most groups end because of operations carried out by local police or intelligence agencies or because they join the political process. This suggests that the United States should pursue a counterterrorism strategy against al Qa’ida that emphasizes policing and intelligence gathering rather than a “war on terrorism” approach that relies heavily on military force.
likely rings true to many who question the use of drones etc. (The comments on Bruce’s page get into some of this point).
To me the fact that RAND put the paper out is interesting. I can never tell whether RAND or what RAND is about. It would seem that claims that RAND is only going to support the government’s goals might be challenged here. Also Bruce calls out the work of Max Abrahms who in 2008  and 2011  addressed these ideas as well. I urge you read the 2008 post and here is the 2011 abstract
The basic narrative of bargaining theory predicts that, all else equal, anarchy favors concessions to challengers who demonstrate the will and ability to escalate against defenders. For this reason, post-9/11 political science research explained terrorism as rational strategic behavior for non-state challengers to induce government compliance given their constraints. Over the past decade, however, empirical research has consistently found that neither escalating to terrorism nor with terrorism helps non-state actors to achieve their demands. In fact, escalating to terrorism or with terrorism increases the odds that target countries will dig in their political heels, depriving the nonstate challengers of their given preferences. These empirical findings across disciplines, methodologies, as well as salient global events raise important research questions, with implications for counterterrorism strategy.
Bruce was cool enough to include a link to the paper .
Article printed from Concurring Opinions: http://www.concurringopinions.com
URL to article: http://www.concurringopinions.com/archives/2012/11/schneier-calls-out-papers-on-how-terroristist-groups-end.html
URLs in this post:
 noted some research: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/11/how_terrorist_g.html
 How Terrorist Groups End: http://www.rand.org/pubs/research_briefs/RB9351/index1.html
 2008: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2008/10/the_seven_habit.html
 2011: http://www.schneier.com/blog/archives/2012/01/evidence_on_the.html
 link to the paper: http://www.clas.ufl.edu/users/gesenwei/Does%20Terrorism%20Really%20Work%5B1%5D.pdf
Copyright © 2010 Concurring Opinions. All rights reserved.